Control of prolactin-secreting macroadenomas with parenteral, long-acting bromocriptine in 30 patients treated for up to 3 years

Treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hyperprolactinemia is a common endocrine disorder that can be associated with significant morbidity. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses of outcomes of hyperprolactinemic patients, including microadenomas and macroadenomas, to provide evidence-based recommendations for practitioners. Through this review, we aimed to compare efficacy and adverse effects of medications, surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases, reviewed bibliographies of included articles, and contacted experts in the field. Eligible studies provided longitudinal follow-up of patients with hyperprolactinemia and evaluated outcomes of interest. We collected descriptive, quality and outcome data (tumor growth, visual field defects, infertility, sexual dysfunction, amenorrhea/oligomenorrhea and prolactin levels).

RESULTS

After review, 8 randomized and 178 nonrandomized studies (over 3,000 patients) met inclusion criteria. Compared to no treatment, dopamine agonists significantly reduced prolactin level (weighted mean difference, -45; 95% confidence interval, -77 to -11) and the likelihood of persistent hyperprolactinemia (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 0.99). Cabergoline was more effective than bromocriptine in reducing persistent hyperprolactinemia, amenorrhea/oligomenorrhea, and galactorrhea. A large body of noncomparative literature showed dopamine agonists improved other patient-important outcomes. Low-to-moderate quality evidence supports improved outcomes with surgery and radiotherapy compared to no treatment in patients who were resistant to or intolerant of dopamine agonists.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide evidence to support the use of dopamine agonists in reducing prolactin levels and persistent hyperprolactinemia, with cabergoline proving more efficacious than bromocriptine. Radiotherapy and surgery are useful in patients with resistance or intolerance to dopamine agonists.

Anemia and fatigue in cancer patients

Although strong evidence indicates that fatigue can be caused by anemia, little is known about the relationship between the extent and rate of hemoglobin loss and the development of fa tigue. Anemia, an insufficiency of red blood cells to maintain adequate tissue oxygenation, is the most common hematologic abnormality associ ated with cancer. It usually results from a de crease in red blood cell production, resulting from either direct tumor invasion of bone mar row or the anemia of chronic disease. Fatigue is a subjective sensation, often described as tired ness, exhaustion, lethargy, or malaise. The mechanism that precipitates or sustains fatigue is probably multifactorial and includes the re lease of inflammatory cytokines and the onset of the acute-phase inflammatory response. Other factors that contribute to cancer-related fatigue include the underlying disease, treatment of the disease, intercurrent systemic illnesses, sleep disorders, immobility and lack of exercise, chronic pain, and psychosocial factors. A review of cancer-related anemia and fatigue is pre sented, which focuses on the clinical decision- making process regarding the management of these syndromes when they exist concurrently.

Treatment with long acting repeatable bromocriptine (Parlodel-LAR*) in patients with macroprolactinomas: long-term study in 29 patients

The aim of the study was to evaluate the short term and long-term effects of long acting repeatable bromocriptine (= Parlodel-LAR*) in patients with macroprolactinomas. Twenty-nine patients (15 men and 14 women) aged 42 +/- 2.7 (M +/- SEM) years were injected with Parlodel-LAR* every 4 weeks during 3.3 +/- 0.3 years. The starting dose was 50 mg/injection, then it was increased to 100 mg in 11 patients and 150 mg in 9 patients. PRL levels decreased in all but one patient 4 weeks after the first injection (270 +/- 59 vs 934 +/- 210 ng/ml, p < 0.001), then became less than 20 ng/ml in 20/29 (69%) patients and finally became undetectable or low in 13/29 (45%) patients. Visual field defects were present in 12/29 patients before treatment. In 11/12 patients, treatment with Parlodel-LAR* resulted in an improvement and complete correction of visual field defects was observed in 8/12 patients. Adenoma size (2.5 +/- 0.2 cm before treatment) was reduced by at least 20% in 24/29 (83%) patients. Disappearance of adenoma was observed on CT scan in 8/29 (28%) patients after 28.7 +/- 5.3 months of treatment. Minor side effects occurred in 20 patients after the first injection then disappeared in 18 patients within the following 6 months of treatment. One patient had rhinorrhea after 3 months of treatment. Treatment with Parlodel-LAR* results in beneficial short-term effects (with rapid correction of recent onset visual field defects) and long-term effects (which can include complete disappearance of adenoma on CT scan evaluation) in patients with macroprolactinomas.

Effectiveness of a long-acting injectable form of bromocriptine in patients with prolactin and growth hormone secreting macroadenomas

OBJECTIVE

With the development of new long-acting depot preparations of bromocriptine (bromocriptine LAR), we investigated the effectiveness of intramuscular injections of long-acting bromocriptine in patients with prolactin and GH secreting macroadenomas.

STUDY DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Fourteen patients with PRL secreting (8 patients) and GH secreting (6 patients) macroadenomas were treated with monthly intramuscular injections of a long-acting and repeatable form of bromocriptine for 3-6 months. A 50-mg monthly dose was administered in the majority of patients with PRL secreting macroadenomas. A 100-mg monthly dose was administered in all patients with GH secreting macroadenomas.

MEASUREMENTS

Plasma PRL and/or GH levels were measured 6 and 12 hours after the first injection and then on days 1, 2, 14 and 28 after each injection, up to a maximum period of 6 months. Patients were hospitalized for 48 hours after each injection and were specifically questioned with respect to side-effects. Pituitary imaging with MRI or CT scans was performed in all patients before commencing treatment and was subsequently repeated in 5/8 patients with macroprolactinomas and 5/6 patients with GH secreting macroadenomas after the completion of a 6-month course of treatment.

RESULTS

In all patients with macroprolactinomas, serum PRL levels decreased significantly after their first 50-mg injection with nadir levels obtained by 24-48 hours post injection (12815 +/- 8704 vs 1480 +/- 1859 mU/l; mean +/- SD, P < 0.01). At their latest follow-up, on a 50-mg monthly dose, 4 patients developed normoprolactinaemia (PRL levels < 360 mU/l) while two patients demonstrated a significant reduction in serum PRL levels (70 and 87% or pretreatment values). In two patients, although a substantial decrement of serum PRL levels was achieved 12-24 hours post injection, serum PRL levels increased to pretreatment values by day 14 post injection. Both patients received a higher (100 mg) monthly dose which was partially effective in one patient. In two patients with GH secreting macroadenomas, a sustained decrease of elevated GH levels was observed; in two patients, while a substantial reduction of the elevated serum GH levels was achieved 12-24 hours after the first and subsequent injections, serum GH levels increased to pretreatment values by day 14 post injection; in two patients there was no effect on the elevated serum GH levels. Significant tumour shrinkage (24-50%) was observed in 5/5 patients with PRL secreting macroadenomas assessed at completion of a 6-month course of treatment. Significant tumour shrinkage was also documented in 2/5 acromegalics tested (29 and 46% respectively).

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that bromocriptine LAR is an effective treatment in the majority of patients with macroprolactinomas; it is also partially effective in some patients with GH secreting macroadenomas.

Long-acting repeatable bromocriptine in the treatment of patients with microprolactinoma intolerant or resistant to oral dopaminergics

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy of long-acting repeatable bromocriptine in suppressing abnormal PRL secretion in microprolactinoma patients. To assess the incidence and nature of side effects induced by the product.

DESIGN

Longitudinal, open label, noncontrolled.

SETTING

Human hyperprolactinemic volunteers in an academic clinical research environment.

PATIENTS

Ten patients with radiologically proven microademonas resistant or intolerant to oral bromocriptine were included.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were treated with 50 to 150 mg of long-acting bromocriptine monthly during 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The serum PRL concentrations and the side-effects were assessed before and after each new injection.

RESULTS

Serum PRL levels decreased during the first cycle to normal values in four patients. At the end of the study the PRL levels were normalized in five cases and were only slightly increased in three. One patient was resistant to the treatment. Two among four infertile women became pregnant. In nine patients the accompanying symptoms disappeared after the 2nd month. Adverse events were mild or moderate and circumscribed to the 1st month of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The long-acting bromocriptine is both effective and well tolerated and is a good alternative to the oral approach in the management of microprolactinoma patients.

Treatment of prolactinoma patients with the new non-ergot dopamine agonist roxindol: first results

We studied the effects of the new non-ergot D2-dopamine agonist roxindol for the treatment of human prolactinomas. Roxindol is a non-ergot drug with additional 5-hydroxytryptamine type 1 A agonist and serotonin reuptake inhibitory activity. Ten patients with prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas received roxindol three times daily at a dosage of 7.5-30 mg/day for at least 4 weeks according to a prospective protocol. All patients but one had received oral bromocriptine previously without normalization of prolactin levels. Serum prolactin profiles were analyzed once a week during the first month of therapy and at 4-week intervals thereafter. Mean baseline serum prolactin was suppressed from 23,000 +/- 13,600 mU/l (range 1500-141,000 mU/l; 20 mU/l = 1 microgram/l) by 37 +/- 11% after 1 week, by 49 +/- 9% after 4 weeks, and by 65 +/- 11% (n = 8) after 24 weeks of treatment. Serum prolactin was normalized in two patients. A tumor volume reduction of 20-25% was obtained in two subjects. Compared with previous treatment with oral bromocriptine the decrease in serum prolactin was comparable. In contrast, tolerance of roxindol was superior in five of seven patients with major side effects with bromocriptine, including three subjects who had discontinued bromocriptine because of adverse reactions. Four subjects spontaneously reported improvement of psychological and physical performance. One patient had a transient increase of serum transaminases. Thus, for the first time we could show a suppressive effect of roxindol on prolactin secretion in human prolactinomas. Due to its good tolerance roxindol may provide a useful alternative to bromocriptine.

CV 205-502 in the treatment of tumoral and non-tumoral hyperprolactinemic states

CV 205-502 (octahydrobenzol[g]quinoline), a non-ergot dopamine agonist drug, was administered to 40 patients with hyperprolactinemic syndrome: 16 patients with macroprolactinoma, 14 with microprolactinoma and 10 with non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia. Twenty-four out of 40 patients had previously been treated by surgery and/or bromocriptine, with variable results. All had gonadal dysfunction and 22 patients had galactorrhea. Eight patients with macroprolactinoma had defects of the visual field. Pre-treatment serum PRL levels ranged from 60 to 2050 micrograms/l. The daily dose of CV 205-502 used in this trial ranged from 0.075 to 0.600 mg. After 6-12 months of treatment, serum PRL level decreased in all the patients reaching normoprolactinemia in 31 of them (77.5%) who demonstrated restoration of menses and disappearance of galactorrhea. The remaining nine patients (22.5%) had only a decrease of PRL levels without reaching normoprolactinemia and without any clinical effect. In 12 out of 16 patients with macroprolactinoma not previously surgically treated, a significant tumor shrinkage was shown by means of Computed Tomography and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The disappearance of visual defects was obtained in four out of eight patients. CV 205-502 was tolerated satisfactorily: mild side-effects occurred in four patients in the first week of treatment and spontaneously disappeared, whereas six patients (15%) needed to withdraw the therapy after 6 months because of side-effects. In conclusion CV 205-502 is a potent and well-tolerated drug in the treatment of tumoral and non-tumoral hyperprolactinemic states and is an effective alternative to other dopamine agonists in use today.