Older patients' experiences of treatment for colorectal cancer: an analysis of functional status and service use

The impact of breast cancer surgery on functional status in older women - A systematic review of the literature

Primary endocrine therapy as treatment of breast cancer is only recommended in older women with limited life expectancy. However, many older women opt for endocrine therapy due to concerns regarding frailty and potential decline in function after surgery. A decline in functional status after surgery is documented in some cancer types, such as colorectal, however, the full impact of breast cancer surgery is less understood. A systematic review was performed to examine the evidence for impact of breast cancer surgery on functional status in older women. PubMed and Embase databases were searched. Studies were eligible if performed within the last 10 years; included patients over the age of 65 years undergoing breast cancer surgery; included stratification of results by age; measured functional status pre-operatively and at least six months following surgery. A total of 11 studies including 12 030 women were appraised. Two studies represented level-II and nine level-IV evidence. Overall, physical activity level was negatively impacted by breast cancer surgery and this was compounded by the extent of surgery. Evidence for impact of breast cancer surgery on quality of life, fatigue and cognition, was conflicting. The possibility of decline in functional status after breast cancer surgery should be discussed in all older women considering surgery. A structured exercise program may improve the negative effects of surgery on physical activity. Further work is required in the areas of quality of life, fatigability and cognition.

Employment Concerns and Associated Impairments of Women Living With Advanced Breast Cancer

Objective

To describe the clinical and personal factors associated with work status, distress regarding work status, and the desire to resume employment and receive help to address work challenges reported by women living with advanced breast cancer.

Design

Descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to explore factors related to employment challenges in this secondary analysis of an existing dataset.

Setting

Participants were recruited from an outpatient oncology clinic specializing in breast cancer at a free-standing comprehensive cancer center.

Participants

English-speaking women older than 18 years living with metastatic breast cancer with intact mental status and Karnofsky Performance Scale scores between 40 and 90 (N=163).

Intervention

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Dependent variables included (1) continued employment if working at the time of cancer diagnosis; (2) interest in resuming employment if working at the time of cancer diagnosis and now no longer working; (3) distress regarding vocational limitations; and (4) interest in receiving help to resume work.

Results

Seventy percent of the sample was working before their cancer diagnosis (n=114), yet only 21% (n=35) was working when surveyed. Lower functional status and higher symptom burden were strongly and consistently associated with lack of work retention, distress related to vocational role limitations, and desire for help in addressing limitations (all P values<.01).

Conclusions

With more people living longer with metastatic cancer, there is a need to assess and support survivors’ desire and capacity to maintain employment. Participants’ reduced employment was strongly associated with potentially actionable clinical targets (ie, higher symptom burden and lower functional status) that fall within cancer rehabilitation’s mission.

The short-term impact of colorectal cancer treatment on physical activity, functional status and quality of life: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Physical activity, functional status and quality of life (QoL) are important determinants of the quality of life (QoL) after colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment; however, little is known on how the treatment impacts these outcomes. Having this understanding could help clinicians develop and implement strategies that would enhance or maintain the QoL of CRC patients.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the impact of curative CRC treatment (surgery with or without radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy) on physical activity, functional status and QoL within one year of treatment or diagnosis.

INCLUSION CRITERIA TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

Colorectal cancer survivors aged 18 years and over.

TYPES OF INTERVENTIONS

Curative CRC treatment, which was surgery with or without radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy.

TYPES OF STUDIES

Pre- and post-observational and experimental studies.

OUTCOMES

Physical activity, ability to perform activities of daily living (functional status) and QoL.

SEARCH STRATEGY

CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, OpenGrey and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses were used to obtain published and unpublished studies in English. The date range was the start of indexing to February 2015.

METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY

All studies were assessed independently by two reviewers for relevance, eligibility and methodological quality.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data from included papers were extracted using a modified data extraction tool. Data that were presented graphically were extracted using online software.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The differences between postoperative and baseline values were calculated using the Review Manager 5.3.5 (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane) calculator and expressed as mean difference and their corresponding 95% confidence interval. Where possible, study results were pooled in statistical meta-analysis. The physical activity, functional status and some QoL results are presented in a narrative and table form.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies were included in this review: two studies (N = 2019 patients) evaluated physical activity, two studies (N = 6908 patients) assessed functional status and 22 studies (N = 2890 patients) measured QoL. Physical activity was observed to decrease at six months after treatment. The functional status of CRC patients decreased, particularly in the elderly (Summary of findings 1 and 2). As for QoL, only the physical and functional aspects were seen to decline up to six months, but scores almost returned to baseline levels at one year after treatment. The QoL studies that used the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 tool were pooled in statistical meta-analysis and summarized in Summary of findings 2. The results must be interpreted carefully due to the heterogeneity of studies and scarcity of recent studies.

CONCLUSION

In spite of the limitations, it is likely that the physical and functional capacity of CRC survivors deteriorates after treatment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The period between diagnosis and treatment provides an opportunity for clinicians to implement interventions (e.g. exercise interventions) that could enhance or restore the physical and functional capacity of CRC survivors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

The paucity of studies and heterogeneity need to be addressed. The outcomes for colon and rectal cancer survivors, ostomates and non-ostomates must be analyzed separately.

Experiences of Uncertainty in Men With an Elevated PSA

A significant proportion of men, ages 50 to 70 years, have, and continue to receive prostate specific antigen (PSA) tests to screen for prostate cancer (PCa). Approximately 70% of men with an elevated PSA level will not subsequently be diagnosed with PCa. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 men with an elevated PSA level who had not been diagnosed with PCa. Uncertainty was prominent in men's reactions to the PSA results, stemming from unanswered questions about the PSA test, PCa risk, and confusion about their management plan. Uncertainty was exacerbated or reduced depending on whether health care providers communicated in lay and empathetic ways, and provided opportunities for question asking. To manage uncertainty, men engaged in information and health care seeking, self-monitoring, and defensive cognition. Results inform strategies for meeting informational needs of men with an elevated PSA and confirm the primary importance of physician communication behavior for open information exchange and uncertainty reduction.

Delivering tailored surgery to older cancer patients: Preoperative geriatric assessment domains and screening tools - A systematic review of systematic reviews

The onco-geriatric population is increasing and thus more and more elderly will require surgery; an important treatment modality for many cancer types. This population's heterogeneity demands preoperative risk stratification, which has led to the introduction of Geriatric Assessment (GA) and associated screening tools in surgical oncology. Many reviews have investigated the use of GA in onco-geriatric patients. Discrepancies in outcomes between studies currently hamper the implementation of a preoperative GA in clinical practice. A systematic review of systematic reviews was performed in order to investigate assessment tools of the most commonly included GA domains and their predictive ability regarding the adverse postoperative outcomes. All domains - except polypharmacy - were, to a varying degree, associated with different adverse postoperative outcomes. Functional status, comorbidity and frailty were assessed most frequently and were most often significant. The association between domain impairments and adverse postoperative outcomes appeared to be greatly influenced by the study population characteristics and selection bias, as well as the type of assessment tool used due to possible ceiling effects and its sensitivity to detect domain impairments. Frailty seems to be the most important predictor, which underpins the importance of an integrated approach. As it is unlikely that one universal GA will fit all, feasibility, based on the time, expertise, and resources available in daily clinical practice as well as the patient population to hand, should be taken into consideration, when tailoring the 'optimal GA'.

Synthesis and summary of patient-reported outcome measures to inform the development of a core outcome set in colorectal cancer surgery

AIM

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) are standard measures in the assessment of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment, but the range and complexity of available PROMs may be hindering the synthesis of evidence. This systematic review aimed to: (i) summarize PROMs in studies of CRC surgery and (ii) categorize PRO content to inform the future development of an agreed minimum 'core' outcome set to be measured in all trials.

METHOD

All PROMs were identified from a systematic review of prospective CRC surgical studies. The type and frequency of PROMs in each study were summarized, and the number of items documented. All items were extracted and independently categorized by content by two researchers into 'health domains', and discrepancies were discussed with a patient and expert. Domain popularity and the distribution of items were summarized.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight different PROMs were identified from the 104 included studies. There were 23 generic, four cancer-specific, 11 disease-specific and 16 symptom-specific questionnaires, and three ad hoc measures. The most frequently used PROM was the EORTC QLQ-C30 (50 studies), and most PROMs (n = 40, 69%) were used in only one study. Detailed examination of the 50 available measures identified 917 items, which were categorized into 51 domains. The domains comprising the most items were 'anxiety' (n = 85, 9.2%), 'fatigue' (n = 67, 7.3%) and 'physical function' (n = 63, 6.9%). No domains were included in all PROMs.

CONCLUSION

There is major heterogeneity of PRO measurement and a wide variation in content assessed in the PROMs available for CRC. A core outcome set will improve PRO outcome measurement and reporting in CRC trials.

Predictors of 1-Year Mortality in a Prospective Cohort of Elderly Patients With Cancer

BACKGROUND

Mortality prediction is crucial to select the optimal treatment in elderly cancer patients. Our objective was to identify cancer-related factors and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) findings associated with 1-year mortality in elderly inpatients and outpatients with cancer.

METHODS

We prospectively included patients aged ≥70 years who had solid or hematologic malignancies and in whom the CGA was performed by geriatricians in two French teaching hospitals. We identified independent predictors of 1-year mortality after study inclusion, using multivariate Cox models stratified on inpatient/outpatient status. We built three multivariate Cox models, since strong correlations linked activities of daily living (ADL), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS), and timed get-up-and-go test (GUG) results; and since physicians' preferences for these three assessments vary. A sensitivity analysis was performed using multiple imputation.

RESULTS

Of the 993 patients (mean age, 80.2 years; 51.2% men), 58.2% were outpatients and 46% had metastatic disease. Colorectal cancer was the most common malignancy (21.4%). Mortality rates after 6 and 12 months were 30.1% and 41.2%, respectively. In all models, tumor site and metastatic status (p < .001), age >80 years (p < .05), higher number of severe comorbidities (p < .05), and malnutrition (p < .001) were associated with death independently from impaired ECOG-PS (p < .001), ADL (p < .001), and GUG (p < .001). The adverse effect of metastatic status differed significantly across tumor sites, being greatest for breast and prostate cancer (p < .001). Multiple imputation produced similar results.

CONCLUSION

The predictors of 1-year mortality identified in our study may help physicians select the optimal cancer-treatment strategy in elderly patients.

Research in cancer care disparities in countries with universal healthcare: mapping the field and its conceptual contours

The paper reviews published studies focused on disparities in receipt of cancer treatments and supportive care services in countries where cancer care is free at the point of access. We map these studies in terms of the equity stratifiers they examined, the countries in which they took place, and the care settings and cancer populations they investigated. Based on this map, we reflect on patterns of scholarly attention to equity and disparity in cancer care. We then consider conceptual challenges and opportunities in the field, including how treatment disparities are defined, how equity stratifiers are defined and conceptualized and how disparities are explained, with special attention to the challenge of psychosocial explanations.

Differences in the symptom experience of older oncology outpatients

CONTEXT

The relatively low number of older patients in cancer trials limits knowledge of how older adults experience symptoms associated with cancer and its treatment.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated for differences in the symptom experience across four older age groups (60-64, 65-69, 70-74, ≥75 years).

METHODS

Demographic, clinical, and symptom data from 330 patients aged >60 years who participated in one Australian and two U.S. studies were evaluated. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale was used to evaluate the occurrence, severity, frequency, and distress of 32 symptoms commonly associated with cancer and its treatment.

RESULTS

On average, regardless of the age group, patients reported 10 concurrent symptoms. The most prevalent symptoms were physical in nature. Worrying was the most common psychological symptom. For 28 (87.5%) of the 32 Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale symptoms, no age-related differences were found in symptom occurrence rates. For symptom severity ratings, an age-related trend was found for difficulty swallowing. As age increased, severity of difficulty swallowing decreased. For symptom frequency, age-related trends were found for feeling irritable and diarrhea, with both decreasing in frequency as age increased. For symptom distress, age-related trends were found for lack of energy, shortness of breath, feeling bloated, and difficulty swallowing. As age increased, these symptoms received lower average distress ratings.

CONCLUSION

Additional research is warranted to examine how age differences in symptom experience are influenced by treatment differences, aging-related changes in biological or psychological processes, or age-related response shift.

Symptom burden and comorbidities impact the consistency of responses on patient-reported functional outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of symptom intensity, mood, and comorbidities on patient-clinician agreement and the consistency of responses to functional patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

DESIGN

Two data sources were used. The first, a cross-sectional database of patients with breast cancer who completed functional PROs and were administered the FIM, was used to examine whether average pain intensity (as measured with an 11-point numeric rating scale [NRS]) and Rand Mental Health inventory scores differed among those rating their functional independence as different than clinicians. The second, a longitudinal database of 311 adults with late-stage lung cancer who completed the Activity Measure for Post Acute Care Computer Adaptive Test (AM PAC CAT) with differences between their expected and actual responses as reflected in their AM PAC CAT SEs.

SETTING

Two tertiary medical centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Data source #1, 163 women with stage IV breast cancer; data source #2, 311 adults with late-stage lung cancer.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Data source #1, FIM, pain NRS, Older Americans Resource Study activities of daily living subscale, Physical Function-10, Mental Health Inventory-17. Data source #2, AM PAC CAT and NRS symptom ratings.

RESULTS

Pain intensity was significantly higher when clinicians and patients disagreed regarding a patient's independence in the ability to transfer (NRS pain severity, 3.78 vs 2.40; P=.014), groom (3.71 vs 2.36, P=.009), bathe (3.76 vs 2.40, P=.016), and dress (3.09 vs 2.44, P=.034). The magnitude of AM PAC CAT SEs was significantly associated with the severity of participants' pain, dyspnea, and fatigue, as well as the presence of musculoskeletal disorders and coronary artery disease. Neither mood nor emotional distress was associated with clinician-patient agreement or AM PAC CAT SE.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain intensity is associated with disagreement between patients and clinicians about the patient's level of functioning. Moreover, physical symptoms (pain, dyspnea, fatigue) as well as specific medical comorbidities (musculoskeletal disorders, coronary artery disease), but not mood, are associated with inconsistency in patients' assessment of their functional abilities.

A narrative literature review of older people's cancer pain experience

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To synthesise current evidence about the experience of older people with cancer pain and consider how exploration of this may inform clinical practice and research.

BACKGROUND

Cancer is more prevalent in older age. Evidence suggests that older people's pain is generally under-recognised and under treated. Pain is a significant concern for many people living and dying with cancer and may be of particular concern for older people who may have complex biopsychosocial needs. There is mounting evidence that older people and their families experience high level of unmet need generally and suboptimal pain in particular.

DESIGN

Narrative literature review.

METHOD

A comprehensive search of five electronic databases was undertaken between the years 1996-2010 inclusive. Inclusion criteria were primary research papers relating older peoples' experiences of cancer pain, incorporating the verbal report or narrative account of experience of cancer.

RESULTS

Seventeen papers met the criteria for inclusion in the review. Three major themes emerged from the literature: (1) emotional experience identified by older people with cancer pain, (2) effects of pain on life and living, and (3) how communication affects the experience or expression of cancer pain including subthemes of validating, trust and cultural effects on the communication of pain.

CONCLUSION

There is limited research about older people's cancer pain from the perspective of the person experiencing the pain. This review highlights the need for further research into living and dying with cancer pain which incorporates the unique and individual experience of older people.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Understanding the complexity and nature of older people's cancer pain experience should inform appropriate effective care that improves quality of life and promotes independence and dignity. Culturally sensitive training in communication may enhance understanding of the needs of older people with cancer pain.

Use of geriatric assessment for older adults in the oncology setting: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Geriatric assessment is a multidisciplinary diagnostic process that evaluates the older adult's medical, psychological, social, and functional capacity. No systematic review of the use of geriatric assessment in oncology has been conducted. The goals of this systematic review were: 1) to provide an overview of all geriatric assessment instruments used in the oncology setting; 2) to examine the feasibility and psychometric properties of those instruments; and 3) to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of geriatric assessment in predicting or modifying outcomes (including the impact on treatment decision making, toxicity of treatment, and mortality).

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Psychinfo, Cinahl, and the Cochrane Library for articles published in English, French, Dutch, or German between January 1, 1996, and November 16, 2010, reporting on cross-sectional, longitudinal, interventional, or observational studies that assessed the feasibility or effectiveness of geriatric assessment instruments. The quality of articles was evaluated using relevant quality assessment frameworks.

RESULTS

We identified 83 articles that reported on 73 studies. The quality of most studies was poor to moderate. Eleven studies examined psychometric properties or diagnostic accuracy of the geriatric assessment instruments used. The assessment generally took 10-45 min. Geriatric assessment was most often completed to describe a patient's health and functional status. Specific domains of geriatric assessment were associated with treatment toxicity in 6 of 9 studies and with mortality in 8 of 16 studies. Of the four studies that examined the impact of geriatric assessment on the cancer treatment decision, two found that geriatric assessment impacted 40%-50% of treatment decisions.

CONCLUSION

Geriatric assessment in the oncology setting is feasible, and some domains are associated with adverse outcomes. However, there is limited evidence that geriatric assessment impacted treatment decision making. Further research examining the effectiveness of geriatric assessment on treatment decisions and outcomes is needed.

Information needs across the colorectal cancer care continuum: scoping the literature

Because cancer care requires a multifaceted approach, providing useful and timely information to people with colorectal cancer may be fragmented and inconsistent. Our interest was in examining what has and has not captured the attention of researchers speaking to the information needs of people with colorectal cancer. We followed Arksey and O'Malley's framework for the methodology of scoping review. Focusing solely on colorectal cancer, we analysed 239 articles to get a picture of which information needs and sources of information, as well as the timing of providing information, were attended to. Treatment-related information received the most mentions (26%). Healthcare professionals (49%) were mentioned as the most likely source of information. Among articles focused on one stage of the care continuum, post-treatment (survivorship) received the most attention (16%). Only 27% of the articles consulted people with colorectal cancer and few attended to diet/nutrition and bowel management. This study examined the numerical representation of issues to which researchers attend, not the quality of the mentions. We ponder, however, on the relationship between the in/frequency of mentions and the actual information needs of people with colorectal cancer as well as the availability, sources and timing of information.

A cohort study of the recovery of health and wellbeing following colorectal cancer (CREW study): protocol paper

Background

The number of people surviving colorectal cancer has doubled in recent years. While much of the literature suggests that most people return to near pre-diagnosis status following surgery for colorectal cancer, this literature has largely focused on physical side effects. Longitudinal studies in colorectal cancer have either been small scale or taken a narrow focus on recovery after surgery. There is a need for a comprehensive, long-term study exploring all aspects of health and wellbeing in colorectal cancer patients. The aim of this study is to establish the natural history of health and wellbeing in people who have been treated for colorectal cancer. People have different dispositions, supports and resources, likely resulting in individual differences in restoration of health and wellbeing. The protocol described in this paper is of a study which will identify who is most at risk of problems, assess how quickly people return to a state of subjective health and wellbeing, and will measure factors which influence the course of recovery.

Methods/design

This is a prospective, longitudinal cohort study following 1000 people with colorectal cancer over a period of two years, recruiting from 30 NHS cancer treatment centres across the UK. Questionnaires will be administered prior to surgery, and 3, 9, 15 and 24 months after surgery, with the potential to return to this cohort to explore on-going issues related to recovery after cancer.

Discussion

Outcomes will help inform health care providers about what helps or hinders rapid and effective recovery from cancer, and identify areas for intervention development to aid this process. Once established the cohort can be followed up for longer periods and be approached to participate in related projects as appropriate and subject to funding.

An examination of the causes for the underutilization of rehabilitation services among people with advanced cancer

To outline the potential reasons for the persistent underutilization of rehabilitation services in the care of patients with advanced cancer, a literature review and post hoc analysis of data collected from 163 patients with stage IV breast cancer are used to examine the role of accumulated physical impairments and adverse symptoms in cancer-related disablement. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to estimate the variance in functional outcomes (as measured by the Physical Function-10, Functional Independence Measure, and the Older Americans Resource Study subscales) explained by the presence and interaction of physical impairments, pain (Brief Pain Inventory scores), and exertional limitations (6-min walk test performance). A majority of patients had more than three impairments. Potentially catastrophic impairments, for example, paraparesis and hemiparesis, occurred in only 15% of patients. Although most specific impairments explained less than 5% of the variance in functional outcomes, a participant's total number of impairments was strongly correlated with his/her performance status and explained between 36% and 52% of the variance in functional outcomes. Brief Pain Inventory scores and exertional intolerance explained a greater proportion of the variance in functional outcomes than did the presence of impairments. Multivariate models using total number of impairments, Brief Pain Inventory scores, exertional intolerance, and their interactions accounted for up to 65% of the variance in functional outcomes. The disablement process in metastatic breast cancer is driven by the accrual of multiple physical impairments, adverse symptoms, and their interactions rather than by discrete and functionally catastrophic impairments. Without systematic disability screening, the detection of functional decline may remain challenging.

Performance of common clinician- and self-report measures in assessing the function of community-dwelling people with metastatic breast cancer

Cheville AL, Basford JR, Troxel AB, Kornblith AB. Performance of common clinician- and self-report measures in assessing the function of community-dwelling people with metastatic breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the performance of common clinician- and self-report measures of function in assessing community-dwelling people with metastatic breast cancer.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

A tertiary medical center outpatient cancer clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

A consecutive sample of community-dwelling patients (N=163) with stage IV breast cancer.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Physical Functioning (PF-10) and Role Physical subscales; the Older Americans Resource Study (OARS) activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL subscales; Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS); and the FIM Total and FIM Mobility scores.

RESULTS

With the exception of the PF-10 and Role Physical subscales, which demonstrated floor effects, ceiling effects were detected in all the measures and were particularly persistent in the OARS ADL subscale. Instrument and item score distributions varied markedly across KPS-defined subgroups with FIM Mobility, FIM Total, and OARS subscale score distributions deviating least from the normal in the lowest performing (KPS 40-50) participants. Correlations between self-reported (Role Physical subscales, PF-10, OARS ADL subscales) and the clinician-rated (KPS and FIM scales) scales were moderate to high (r=.55-.82); however, clinician-reported scores were more consistently associated with the presence of physical impairments.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population with stage IV breast cancer, ceiling effects limit the discriminatory capacity of the common functional scales assessed in this study. Instruments and items, particularly when ADL based, tend to perform better at lower levels of function (KPS 40-50) and less well at higher levels. Clinician-rated outcomes may have greater capacity to discriminate the presence of physical impairments.

Prevalence and treatment patterns of physical impairments in patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Physical impairments cause profound functional declines in patients with cancer. Although common rehabilitation measures can address many impairments, the extent of their delivery is unknown. We studied these issues by quantifying physical impairments in patients with metastatic breast cancer and by assessing how they are addressed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A consecutive sample of 163 community-dwelling patients with metastatic breast cancer was stratified by Karnofsky performance score and administered the Medical Outcomes Study Physical Function Subscale and the Older Americans Resource Study Activities of Daily Living subscales. Cancer-related physical impairments were identified through a physical examination, the 6-Minute Walk Test, and the Functional Independence Measure Mobility Subscale. Patients were questioned regarding the nature, type, and setting of treatments for impairments. Physical rehabilitation needs were determined through a consensus process involving physiatrists and physical/occupational therapists specializing in cancer.

RESULTS

Ninety-two percent of patients (150 of 163) had at least one physical impairment. Among 530 identified impairments, 484 (92%) required a physical rehabilitation intervention and 469 (88%) required physical therapy (PT) and/or occupational therapy (OT). Only 30% of impairments requiring rehabilitation services and 21% of those requiring PT/OT received treatment. Impairments detected during hospitalization were overwhelmingly more likely to receive a rehabilitation intervention (odds ratio [OR] = 87.9; 95% CI, 28.5 to 271.4), and PT/OT (OR = 558.8; 95% CI, 187.0 to 1,669.6). Low socioeconomic and minority status were significantly associated with nontreatment.

CONCLUSION

Remediable physical impairments were prevalent and poorly addressed among patients with metastatic breast cancer, drastically so in the outpatient setting. Undertreatment was particularly prominent among minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups.

Supporting the carers of individuals affected by colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers, and many difficulties may be experienced as a direct consequence of the disease and its treatment. These can be alleviated and/or resolved with appropriate care. Much of this care is provided informally by the individual's family and friends, whose care needs may be practical, emotional, financial, spiritual or organizational in nature. Care requirement can, as a consequence, be variable in its responsibilities, regularity and duration, since the individual diagnosed with colorectal cancer may require a wide range of support throughout their cancer journey, or have only a few temporary care needs, depending on their disease, treatment and a multitude of other personal, interpersonal and contextual factors. This highlights the importance of regular and individualized assessment. The caregiver's role is often forgotten and hence the impact it may be having upon their own health and lives gets overlooked. Yet, a carer's ability to manage this role has an important bearing not only on patient experience but also on the level of professional involvement. To perform this role satisfactorily carers need to be prepared, supported and also assessed at key points in the patient's cancer journey. Nurses have a professional obligation to help carers by first preparing them, then maintaining sufficient contact to be able to proactively provide practical support and additional health care as needed. This article focuses on these carers and highlights the scope, associated challenges and possible consequences of the caring role. It also seeks to stimulate reflection of how current service provision for carers might be improved.

A systematic review of the use of quality of life measures in colorectal cancer research with attention to outcomes in elderly patients

PURPOSE

Quality of life (QOL) measures are critical to the evaluation of new cancer treatments, particularly for elderly patients. Our intent was to assess patterns of use of QOL endpoints in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment research and to summarize current knowledge about how CRC treatment affects elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE for English-language, human trials published from 1995 to 2005 that met the following criteria: reported on patients with CRC, were not surgery-only cohorts, and included a QOL or functional endpoints. Trials specifically reporting data on elderly patients were reviewed in depth and summarized.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one eligible studies and 10 trials with elderly-specific data were found. The median number of trials published annually increased from 5 (range, 4-8 trials) between 1995 and 1999 to 14.5 (range, 11-22 trials) between 2000 and 2005. Chemotherapy was the most commonly studied treatment (55%), and metastatic CRC (55%) was the most commonly studied population. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer C30, with or without C38, was the most frequently used instrument (49%). Studies reporting on elderly patients showed that many patients experience a decline in physical function immediately after surgery and have increased need for supportive services. Little information is available on the effect of chemotherapy in elderly patients. Use of QOL and functional measures in treatment-related CRC research has increased; however, it continues to be hampered by a lack of dissemination and methodologic problems.

CONCLUSION

Missing data from patient attrition, limitations of assessment methods, and a small number of patients treated with chemotherapy in the trials reporting on elderly patients seriously limit our ability to draw conclusions from this survey about how treatment affects QOL or function in CRC.

Reliability and Validity of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Belief Scale in Turkey

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in Turkey. The emphasis of the healthcare services in Turkey is on curative rather than preventive and rehabilitative approaches. Although the Ministry of Health provides many healthcare services for prevention and early detection, their availability and accessibility are very low. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Turkish language version of Champion's Health Belief Model Scales in measuring Turkish women's and men's beliefs about colorectal cancer. This study was carried out in Izmir, the third most populous city in Turkey. The Champion's Health Belief Model Scales was translated using a back-translation technique. A convenience sample of 470 individuals was recruited from January 2004 through March 2004. Descriptive statistics were computed for the demographic characteristics. Reliability was assessed by interpreting the item-total subscale score correlation, test-retest reliability, and Cronbach alpha coefficients. For testing the relationship between item performance and scale performance, corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.41 to 0.79 for all 5 subscales. Cronbach alpha coefficients for the 5 subscales ranged between .54 and .88, and test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.72 to 0.91. The study showed that the Turkish version of the Champion's Health Belief Model Scales has good structural characteristics and is a reliable and valid instrument that can be used for measuring beliefs related to colorectal cancer.