Metabolic and clinical studies on patients with acromegaly treated with bromocriptine over 22 months

Current status and future opportunities for controlling acromegaly

Growth-hormone (GH) secreting adenomas, including acromegaly, account for approximately one-sixth of all pituitary adenomas and are associated with mortality rates at least twice that of the general population. The ultimate goal of therapy for acromegaly is normalization of morbidity and mortality rates achieved through removal or reduction of the tumor mass and normalization of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels. Previously published efficacy results of current treatment modalities (surgery, conventional radiation, and medical therapy with dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogs) are often difficult to compare because of the different criteria used to define cure (some of which are now considered inadequate). For each of these modalities, pooled data from a series of acromegaly studies were reviewed for rates of IGF-I normalization, a currently accepted definition of cure. The results showed overall cure rates of approximately 10% for bromocriptine, 34% for cabergoline, 36% for conventional radiation, 50-90% for surgery for microadenomas and less than 50% for macroadenomas, and 54-66% for octreotide. These cure rates based on IGF-I normalization are generally less than those reported for cure based solely on GH levels. Novel new therapies for acromegaly include the somatostatin analog, lanreotide, Gamma Knife radiosurgery, and pegvisomant, the first in its class of new GH receptor antagonists. Although it does not appear that Gamma Knife radiosurgery results in significantly higher cure rates or fewer complications, it does provide a notable improvement in delivery compared with conventional radiation. Early studies have reported IGF-I normalization in 48% of lanreotide-treated patients and up to 97% of pegvisomant-treated.

Antiparkinsonian Agents : Clinically Significant Drug Interactions and Adverse Effects, and Their Management

The treatment of Parkinson's disease for most patients entails long term exposure to multiple agents, including anticholinergics, levodopa, amantadine, dopamine receptor agonists, catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, selegiline (deprenyl) and clozapine. Patients with Parkinson's disease require medication for the control of the motor symptoms of their condition, for related medical or psychiatric symptoms of the disorder, and for concurrent medical problems, such as hypertension or cardiac disease.All these agents may cause adverse effects. There is a potential for drug-drug interactions between different antiparkinsonian agents and between antiparkinsonian medication and the other drugs a patient may be taking. Clinicians caring for patients with Parkinson's disease must be knowledgable about the potential adverse effects and drug interactions of an expanding array of medications for this condition.

Dopamine, the dopamine D2 receptor and pituitary tumours

Dopamine plays an important role in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis where its major effects are to inhibit pituitary hormone secretion and cell division. Chronic dopamine deficiency has been postulated as a cause of pituitary tumour formation and several lines of evidence exist to suggest that a functional deficiency may develop as a result of defective dopamine receptor action. The available data suggest that a number of sites in the dopamine-D2 receptor-second messenger pathways may be implicated. These abnormalities are reflected in the variety of responses to dopamine and its agonists which have been observed in pituitary tumours both in the clinical situation and in cultured cells in vitro. Whilst it seems likely that the primary defect in pituitary tumour formation lies within the pituitary itself, the role of hypothalamic factors in facilitating tumour growth remains to be explored. Further studies of the dopamine receptor and its function will be of value not only in pathophysiological studies of human pituitary adenomas, but also in the development of new pharmacological agents to treat patients with these tumours.

Discordant responses of prolactinoma to two different dopamine agonists

A 19-year-old woman presented with headaches, temporal lobe epilepsy and primary amenorrhoea. There was a family history of multiple endocrine adenomatosis. Investigation revealed normal visual fields and acuity, hyperprolactinaemia (48 000 mU/l) and a very large pituitary tumour with extrasellar spread. Treatment with bromocriptine reduced the tumour size and the prolactin level to 2440 mU/l. Six months after the start of therapy, resistance to bromocriptine developed and the prolactin concentration progressively rose to pretreatment levels, despite increasing the dose of bromocriptine to 40 mg/d. At this stage treatment with a second dopamine agonist, pergolide, was effective in reducing the prolactin concentration to normal within four months. Serial CT scans at 1, 6 and 12 months on dopamine agonist therapy showed a progressive decrease in tumour size, which seemed to be maintained even during the period of rising prolactin concentrations due to bromocriptine resistance. This case illustrates that during dopamine agonist therapy a discrepancy may exist in the clinical response as judged by reduction in tumour size and decrease in the circulating prolactin level. Furthermore, in patients with prolactinomas, pergolide may induce a response when resistance to bromocriptine develops.

The safety of bromocriptine in long-term use: a review of the literature

This paper reviews the safety data on bromocriptine administration for 1 to 10 years at daily doses of 1.25 to 80 mg in over 1100 patients with pituitary hormone overproduction (mainly from prolactinomas and growth-hormone producing adenomas), at daily doses of 3.75 to 170 mg in over 700 patients with Parkinson's disease, and at daily doses of 2.5 to 20 mg in 28 patients with various other conditions. In addition, information is provided on the safety for mother and child of bromocriptine administered at daily doses of 2.5 to 35 mg throughout gestation (54 pregnancies) or during its later stages (39 pregnancies). The side-effects of long-term bromocriptine treatment are usually no different from those seen during short-term treatment; most of them are relatively benign, and they have been shown in virtually all patients to be reversible. Bromocriptine appears to have no harmful effect on hepatic, renal, haematologic, or cardiac functions. It is considered that a hitherto unknown, severe though rare side-effect of bromocriptine is unlikely to be reported after such long experience.

Hormone-active intradural spinal metastasis of a prolactinoma--a case report

A 44-year-old woman developed acute severe visual field defects and was operated on a macroprolactinoma. Since complete resection of the tumor was not possible, radiotherapy was performed and in addition to hormone replacement therapy, bromocriptine (up to 60 mg daily) was started without however complete normalization of PRL levels. Four years later PRL levels increased to 10(5) microU/ml despite continuation of dopamin agonist (mesulergin) treatment. As shown by ophthalmological examination and computer tomography there were no signs of regrowth of the pituitary tumor. At that time the patient complained of severe lumbar pain and myelography revealed a tumor mass in the spinal cord (L1-L2). Since the spinal tumor was not removable, laminectomy was performed. Histology and immunohistochemistry demonstrated a metastasis of the prolactinoma. Radiotherapy and bromocriptine in extreme doses (140 mg daily) together with an antiestrogen were not able to improve the neurological deficits (paraparesis) and to lower the PRL levels. This case of a metastasis of a prolactinoma after operation, radiotherapy, and dopamin agonist treatment stresses the importance of close surveillance of patients with prolactinomas without PRL normalization during dopamin agonist therapy and shows for the first time the possibility of ectopic PRL production due to an intradural spinal metastasis.

Reenlargement of macroprolactinomas during bromocriptine treatment: report of two cases

We report two cases with macroprolactinoma who during medical treatment with bromocriptine showed a normalization of PRL levels and a reduction of tumor size as documented by computed tomography. After a few months of therapy both patients suddenly complained of worsening of their visual fields and a computed tomography demonstrated a reenlargement of the tumor mass; whereas in one patient PRL levels remained always within normal range, in the other patient, who was taking spiramycin for an intercurrent illness, there was also an escape of the hormonal secretion from the inhibitory effect of bromocriptine. The first patient underwent surgery, whereas in the second patient continuation of bromocriptine and interruption of antibiotic treatment resulted in progressive improvement in visual fields and a reduction of tumor size again. We want to stress that in patients with macroprolactinomas responsive to the medical treatment both in terms of PRL secretion and of tumor size reduction, an escape from the effects of bromocriptine, although infrequently, may occur.

No effect of bromocriptine in acromegaly: a controlled trial

Although bromocriptine, a dopamine receptor agonist, is now widely used in the treatment of acromegaly, there have been no controlled trials of its biochemical or clinical effects on this disorder. We assessed its effects in a double-blind, crossover study. Eighteen patients with acromegaly were given bromocriptine and placebo alternately for three months per medication. Their responses to oral glucose-tolerance tests during the two regimens did not differ significantly. The number of patients noting amelioration of clinical symptoms during treatment with bromocriptine was almost identical to the number with clinical improvement during placebo. We conclude that it remains doubtful whether bromocriptine has a beneficial effect in acromegaly.

Bomocriptine treatment of patients with acromegaly resistant to conventional therapy

Eleven patients with active acromegaly resistant to conventional therapy were treated with bromocriptine for 15 (12--22) months by increasing the daily dose stepwise from 5 to 10--60 mg. A satisfactory response was achieved in all but one of the eight patients, in whom the mean diurnal level of serum GH was less than 50 ng/ml, whereas patients with grossly elevated serum GH levels responded poorly. In the longterm, no overall effects on glucose tolerance or plasma insulin (IRI) levels were observed but the chemical diabetes of three patients ameliorated in two. On the other hand, a dose-dependent acute suppressive effect of bromocriptine on plasma IRI response to oral glucose was observed, suggesting a direct effect of bromocriptine on the release of insulin from beta cells. Bromocriptine seems to be a good alternative in the treatment of patients with acromegaly who have not responded to conventional therapy.

Chronic dopamine receptor stimulation using bromocriptine: failure to modify thyroid function

Administration of 2.5 mg bromocriptine (Parlodel), a dopamine agonist, on two occasions to six normal volunteers did not alter the plasma TSH response to an i.v. injection of 100 micrograms TRH, but significantly (P less than 0.01) blunted it after 200 micrograms. Chronic bromocriptine treatment (7.5--50 mg/day) of fifteen acromegalic subjects failed to influence basal plasma TSH or the response pattern to 200 micrograms TRH. The thyroxine Binding Index (TBI) and the levels of T3 and T4 were not modified by treatment. These results indicate that chronic dopaminergic therapy with bromocriptine does not alter thyroid function.