Paediatric haemophilia with inhibitors: existing management options, treatment gaps and unmet needs

Untreated bleeds in people with hemophilia A in a noninterventional study and intrapatient comparison after initiating emicizumab in HAVEN 1-3

Background

Bleeding in people with hemophilia A can be life threatening, and intra‐articular bleeds can result in joint damage. Most clinical studies focus on treated bleeds, while bleeds not treated with coagulation factor(s) (untreated bleeds) are underreported.

Objectives

We assessed the incidence of untreated bleeds during a noninterventional study (NIS) wherein people with hemophilia A, with or without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors, were managed according to standard practice.

Patients/Methods

Using the Bleed and Medication Questionnaire, we prospectively collected data from three cohorts: Cohort A, adults/adolescents (age ≥12 years) with FVIII inhibitors; Cohort B, children (aged <12 years) with FVIII inhibitors; Cohort C, adults/adolescents without FVIII inhibitors. Untreated bleeds were analyzed for site, frequency, and etiology of bleeding and compared with those during emicizumab prophylaxis in the same individuals after transferring to a Phase III HAVEN trial.

Results

In the 221 participants enrolled in the NIS (Cohort A, n = 103; Cohort B, n = 24; Cohort C, n = 94), the incidence of untreated bleeds was approximately 40% of all bleeds in people with FVIII inhibitors and 26.2% in adolescents/adults without inhibitors. Approximately 70% of treated bleeds and approximately 54% of untreated bleeds in adults/adolescents were in joints. Untreated joint bleeds were less common (7.1%) in children. Overall, intra‐individual comparisons showed reduced treated/untreated bleeds following transition from standard to emicizumab prophylaxis.

Conclusion

A significant proportion of bleeding events are untreated in people with hemophilia A. There is a need to further understand why bleeds remain untreated and to capture such events in clinical studies.

AKATSUKI study: a prospective, multicentre, phase IV study evaluating the safety of emicizumab under and immediately after immune tolerance induction therapy in persons with congenital haemophilia A with factor VIII inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

For persons with haemophilia A with factor (F) VIII inhibitors (PwHAwI), immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy is indicated for inhibitor eradication; however, since PwHAwI on ITI were excluded from the emicizumab clinical development programme, there are limited safety data for emicizumab treatment under/immediately after ITI in PwHAwI. Accordingly, there is a need to collect safety and efficacy data on this concomitant treatment strategy. The AKATSUKI study aims to evaluate the safety of emicizumab under/immediately after ITI in PwHAwI; here we report details of the study protocol.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

AKATSUKI is an open-label, non-randomised, interventional, multicentre study. Twenty participants with congenital HA with FVIII inhibitors will be enrolled from 17 sites across Japan. Emicizumab will be administered subcutaneously, with an initial loading dose of 3 mg/kg once per week (QW) for the first 4 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose of 1.5 mg/kg QW, 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks or 6 mg/kg once every 4 weeks. For ITI therapy, 50 IU/kg FVIII will be administered three times per week. For extended half-life FVIII, a dosing frequency of twice per week will be permitted. The primary endpoint is a comprehensive safety evaluation of adverse events (mainly thromboembolic events) and abnormal laboratory values over time. Secondary endpoints are the number of bleeds requiring coagulation factor treatment, the number of participants achieving a partially successful ITI response, FVIII inhibitor titres under/immediately after ITI, quality of life and time to achieve a negative FVIII inhibitor result (<0.6 BU/mL) and partial success in PwHAwI starting ITI after study enrolment.

CONCLUSIONS

AKATSUKI will evaluate the safety of emicizumab administered under/immediately after ITI, providing reference data to inform treatment strategies in PwHAwI.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed international journal and presented at national and/or international medical scientific conferences; the major findings of this study will be published on the jRCT registry website (https://jrct.niph.go.jp).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

jRCTs041200037.

Expert opinion on the UK standard of care for haemophilia patients with inhibitors: a modified Delphi consensus study

Background and Aims:

Despite advances in haemophilia care, inhibitor development remains a significant complication. Although viable treatment options exist, there is some divergence of opinion in the appropriate standard approach to care and goals of treatment. The aim of this study was to assess consensus on United Kingdom (UK) standard of care for child and adult haemophilia patients with inhibitors.

Methods:

A modified Delphi study was conducted using a two-round online survey. A haemophilia expert steering committee and published literature informed the Round 1 questionnaire. Invited participants included haematologists, haemophilia nurses and physiotherapists who had treated at least one haemophilia patient with inhibitors in the past 5 years. Consensus for 6-point Likert scale questions was pre-defined as ⩾70% participants selecting 1–2 (disagreement) or 5–6 (agreement).

Results:

In all, 46.7% and 35.9% questions achieved consensus in Rounds 1 (n = 41) and 2 (n = 34), respectively. Consensus was reached on the importance of improving quality of life (QoL) and reaching clinical goals such as bleed prevention, eradication of inhibitors and pain management. There was agreement on criteria constituting adequate/inadequate responses to immune tolerance induction (ITI) and the appropriate factor VIII dose to address suboptimal ITI response. Opinions varied on treatment aims for adults and children/adolescents, when to offer prophylaxis with bypassing agents and expectations of prophylaxis. Consensus was also lacking on appropriate treatment for mild/moderate patients with inhibitors.

Conclusion:

UK healthcare professionals appear to be aligned on the clinical goals and role of ITI when managing haemophilia patients with inhibitors, although novel treatment developments may require reassessment of these goals. Lack of consensus on prophylaxis with bypassing agents and management of mild/moderate cases identifies a need for further research to establish more comprehensive, evidence-based treatment guidance, particularly for those patients who are unable/prefer not to receive non-factor therapies.

Oral Corticosteroid Therapy as an Adjuvant Treatment for Acute Bleeding in Hemophilia Patients With High Titer Inhibitors

Treatment options exist for patients with severe hemophilia and high titer factor VIII inhibitors but is often inadequate. Few studies have been conducted to evaluate the utility of short-term corticosteroid therapy for improvement in bleeding complications and temporary or sustained resolution of inhibitors in these patients. We describe 2 patients with acute muscular hematomas successfully treated with 4 to 5 days of oral adjuvant corticosteroid therapy resulting in improvement in their acute bleeds and temporary reduction of inhibitors. Thus, the addition of corticosteroids to traditional therapy of hemophilia with inhibitors may be beneficial in some patients. In those with impending compartment syndrome steroids may improve edema and bleeding symptoms preventing the need for surgical interventions.

Mortality in congenital hemophilia A - a systematic literature review

Against a background of a rapidly evolving treatment landscape, a contemporary, evidence-based consolidated understanding of mortality in people with congenital hemophilia A (PwcHA) is lacking. This systematic literature review examines the available data on mortality and causes of death in PwcHA to enable a better understanding of fatalities in PwcHA and evaluate the impact of new treatment paradigms on mortality. A systematic literature review of observational studies was conducted by searching Medline, Embase, and clinical trials registries for articles published from January 2010 to March 2020, using the search terms: hemophilia A (HA), mortality, cause of death. Interventional studies, studies not reporting fatalities, and those reporting only on hemophilia B, acquired HA, or mixed other coagulopathies were excluded. Overall, 7818 unique records were identified and 17 were analyzed. Of these, six reported mortality rates and five reported mortality ratios. Mortality generally decreased over time, despite a spike associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the 1980s and 1990s. Mortality was strongly correlated with age and hemophilia severity. People with hemophilia had a raised mortality risk compared with the general population, particularly in severe hemophilia, and when infected with HIV or HCV. Causes of death varied across populations, countries, and time in 15 identified studies; however, incomplete and heterogeneous reporting limits evidence. Hemorrhage, HIV, HCV, and hepatic disease were the leading causes of death. A unified approach to reporting mortality and cause of death is needed to understand mortality in PwcHA as treatments continue to advance.

Health-related quality of life and caregiver burden of emicizumab in children with haemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors-Results from the HAVEN 2 study

INTRODUCTION

Persons with haemophilia A (PwHA) with factor (F)VIII inhibitors, including children, have impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HAVEN 2 study (NCT027955767) of paediatric PwHA with FVIII inhibitors demonstrated that subcutaneous emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in low annualizedbleed rates.

AIM

We assessed the impact of emicizumab prophylaxis on the HRQoL of children and their caregivers participating in HAVEN 2.

METHODS

Children aged 8-11 years self-reported HRQoL using the Haemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Assessment Instrument for Children and Adolescents Short Form (Haemo-QoL SF II). Caregivers of children aged 0-11 years completed the Adapted Inhibitor-Specific Quality of Life Assessment with Aspects of Caregiver Burden. All scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where lower scores reflect a better HRQoL. The number of missed days from school/day care and hospitalizations was also recorded.

RESULTS

In HAVEN 2 (n = 88), the median age was 6.5 years (range: 1-15 years); 85 participants were aged < 12 years and included in this analysis, and 34 participants were aged 8-11 years, thereby eligible to complete the Haemo-QoL SF II questionnaire. The mean (standard deviation, n) baseline Haemo-QoL SF II 'Total' score was 30.2 (14.9, 30), indicating moderate impairment; with emicizumab, mean score decreased by -9.62 (7.73, 17) points to 23.0 (13.93, 20) by Week 49. The most improved domains were 'Sports & School' and 'Physical Health'. Caregivers reported similar improvements.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic emicizumab is accompanied by substantial and sustained improvements in HRQoL of paediatric PwHA with FVIII inhibitors and their caregivers.

Cost-utility analysis of emicizumab prophylaxis in haemophilia A patients with factor VIII inhibitors in Korea

AIMS

Haemophilia A patients with factor VIII inhibitors (HAPI) experience frequent spontaneous bleeding, approximately once a week, and require expensive bypassing agent (BPA) treatments to control bleeding over their lifetime. According to the HAVEN 1 trial, weekly emicizumab (Hemlibra®) prophylaxis injection reduces annualized bleeding rates (ABR) by 87% compared with BPA on-demand treatment (BPA-OD) administered at the time of bleeding. Our study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of emicizumab prophylaxis in HAPI in Korea.

METHODS

Using a lifetime Markov model with health states of 'alive with bleeds' and 'dead', we simulated the experience of HAPI receiving emicizumab prophylaxis (treatment arm) or BPA-OD (control arm) and estimated expected clinical and economic outcomes under each treatment arm. Model parameters included comparative effectiveness, clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of Korean HAPI, costs of drug treatment and medical events and utility for 'alive with bleeds' state under each treatment. We utilized local data, including National Health Insurance claims data, national statistics, literature and expert surveys with haematologists.

RESULTS

Base-case analysis results showed that compared with BPA-OD, lifetime emicizumab prophylaxis prevented 807 bleedings, extended 3.04 quality-adjusted life-years and reduced costs by 2.6 million US dollars. Thus, emicizumab prophylaxis is a dominant treatment option with better effectiveness and lower costs than BPA-OD. A series of one-way sensitivity analyses consistently showed dominant results, confirming that lifetime emicizumab prophylaxis is a cost-saving intervention for HAPI.

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab prophylaxis is an excellent treatment choice reducing ABR, improving quality of life and reducing costs.

A multicenter, open-label phase 3 study of emicizumab prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A with inhibitors

Emicizumab, a bispecific humanized monoclonal antibody, bridges activated factor IX (FIX) and FX to restore the function of missing activated FVIII in hemophilia A. Emicizumab prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A and FVIII inhibitors was investigated in a phase 3 trial (HAVEN 2). Participants, previously receiving episodic/prophylactic bypassing agents (BPAs), were treated with subcutaneous emicizumab: 1.5 mg/kg weekly (group A), 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (group B), or 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks (group C). Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy (including an intraindividual comparison of participants from a noninterventional study) were evaluated. Eighty-five participants aged <12 years were enrolled. In group A (n = 65), the annualized rate of treated bleeding events (ABRs) was 0.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.50), and 77% had no treated bleeding events. Intraindividual comparison of 15 participants who previously took BPA prophylaxis showed that emicizumab prophylaxis reduced the ABR by 99% (95% CI, 97.4-99.4). In groups B (n = 10) and C (n = 10), ABRs were 0.2 (95% CI, 0.03-1.72) and 2.2 (95% CI, 0.69-6.81), respectively. The most frequent adverse events were nasopharyngitis and injection-site reactions; no thrombotic events occurred. Two of 88 participants developed antidrug antibodies (ADAs) with neutralizing potential, that is, associated with decreased emicizumab plasma concentrations: 1 experienced loss of efficacy, and, in the other, ADAs disappeared over time without intervention or breakthrough bleeding. All other participants achieved effective emicizumab plasma concentrations, regardless of the treatment regimen. Emicizumab prophylaxis has been shown to be a highly effective novel medication for children with hemophilia A and inhibitors. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02795767.

A randomized trial of safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of concizumab in people with hemophilia A

Essentials explorer™3 was a double-blinded, multiple-dose escalation trial of subcutaneous concizumab. A pharmacodynamic relationship for unbound TFPI and thrombin generation was confirmed. No serious adverse events and no anti-drug antibodies were observed. explorer™3 data support further clinical development of concizumab in people with hemophilia. SUMMARY: Background Concizumab is a humanized mAb targeting tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), leading to enhanced thrombin generation (TG) potential. explorer™3 (NCT02490787) was a phase 1b, double-blind, multiple-dose escalation trial of subcutaneous concizumab in people with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors. Objectives The primary objective was to evaluate safety. Assessments of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and subcutaneous concizumab immunogenicity were secondary objectives. Patients/Methods Adverse events (AEs), clinical assessments and bleeding episodes were recorded. Plasma concizumab levels and unbound TFPI levels were measured with ELISAs; residual TFPI activity was measured with a chromogenic assay. Standardized assays were used to assess TG, D-dimer and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2 ) levels. explorer™3 was completed after investigation of three dose cohorts (0.25, 0.5 and 0.8 mg kg-1 , once every 4 days) had been completed. Twenty-four patients received 12 doses of concizumab or placebo in a 3 : 1 randomization over a 42-day period. Results No serious AEs and no anti-drug antibodies were observed. Fifty-four mild and two moderate AEs were observed in 19 patients. Concizumab exposure increased with dose in a non-linear manner, confirming target-mediated drug disposition. D-dimer and F1 + 2 levels were increased mostly in the highest dose cohort, in line with previous observations. The level of unbound TFPI decreased in a dose-dependent manner, and was accompanied by a residual TFPI activity decrease and an increase in peak TG. Although the trial was not powered to evaluate efficacy, a trend towards lower bleeding rates was observed in patients in the highest dose cohort. Conclusion explorer™3 data support further clinical development of concizumab for use in people with hemophilia, with or without inhibitors.

Practical aspects of extended half-life products for the treatment of haemophilia

Haemophilia A and haemophilia B are congenital X-linked bleeding disorders caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and IX (FIX), respectively. The preferred treatment option for patients with haemophilia is replacement therapy. For patients with severe disease, prophylactic replacement of coagulation factor is the treatment of choice; this has been shown to reduce arthropathy significantly, reduce the frequency of bleeds and improve patients' quality of life. Prophylaxis with standard recombinant factor requires regular intravenous infusion at least two (FIX) to three (FVIII) times a week. Recombinant FVIII and FIX products with an extended half-life are in development, or have been recently licensed. With reported mean half-life extensions of 1.5-1.8 times that of standard products for FVIII and 3-5 times that of standard products for FIX, these products have the potential to address many of the unmet needs of patients currently treated with standard factor concentrates. For example, they may encourage patients to switch from on-demand treatment to prophylaxis and improve the quality of life of patients receiving prophylaxis. Indeed, extended half-life products have the potential to reduce the burden of frequent intravenous injections, reducing the need for central venous lines in children, promote adherence, improve outcomes, potentially allow for more active lifestyles and, depending on the dosing regimen, increase factor trough levels. Members of the Zürich Haemophilia Forum convened for their 19th meeting to discuss the practicalities of incorporating new treatments into the management of people with haemophilia. This review of extended half-life products considers their introduction in haemophilia treatment, including the appropriate dose and schedule of infusions, laboratory monitoring, patient selection, safety considerations, and the economic aspects of care.

Combination of hemostatic therapies for treatment of patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Therapy application and monitoring of patients with hemophilia A (HA) and inhibitors are challenging. In the current study, combined FVIII - bypass therapy was implemented for a cohort of severe HA patients with inhibitors.

METHODS

Plasma of 15 HA patients with inhibitors was spiked ex vivo with FVIII, rFVIIa, FEIBA and their combinations and thrombin generation (TG) was studied. Some patients who experienced hemarthroses or required minor surgeries were treated by a combined concomitant administration of FVIII+FEIBA as IV bolus doses.

RESULTS

TG spiking studies showed individual responses not correlated to inhibitor titer. Combinations of agents augmented TG as compared to any single agent, while combined FVIII+FEIBA yielded the highest TG, supporting it as a potential treatment. Following emergent successful surgery of child treated by concomitant FVIII+FEIBA, a total of 396 episodes in 7/15 patients were treated with concomitant FVIII+FEIBA. Five patients were treated for bleeding episodes only, whereas 2 were children undergoing immune tolerance induction (ITI) with FEIBA prophylaxis. Four minor surgeries were performed on FVIII+FEIBA repeated infusions. Neither thrombosis nor any other adverse events were documented.

CONCLUSION

A combination of FVIII+FEIBA may be effective and safe as an alternative treatment option for some high-responding inhibitor patients.

Hemophilia Care in the Pediatric Age

Hemophilia is the most common of the severe bleeding disorders and if not properly managed since early infancy can lead to chronic disease and lifelong disabilities. However, it enjoys the most efficacious and safe treatment among the most prevalent monogenic disorders. Hemophilia should be considered in the neonatal period in the case of unusual bleeding or in the case of positive family history. Later, hemophilia should be suspected mainly in males because of abnormal bruising/bleeding or unusual bleeding following invasive procedures-for example, tonsillectomy or circumcision. Prophylactic treatment that is started early with clotting-factor concentrates has been shown to prevent hemophilic arthropathy and is, therefore, the gold standard of care for hemophilia A and B in most countries with adequate resources. Central venous access catheters and arterovenous fistulas play an important role in the management of hemophilia children requiring repeated and/or urgent administration of coagulation factor concentrates. During childhood and adolescence, personalized treatment strategies that suit the patient and his lifestyle are essential to ensure optimal outcomes. Physical activity is important and can contribute to better coordination, endurance, flexibility and strength. The present article focuses also on questions frequently posed to pediatric hematologists like vaccinations, day-care/school access and dental care.

Beyond stopping the bleed: short-term episodic prophylaxis with recombinant activated factor FVII in haemophilia patients with inhibitors

Preventing haemarthroses and arthropathy is a major challenge in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors, as treatment options are limited. One potential strategy is short-term episodic prophylaxis, which extends bypassing agent therapy beyond the resolution of bleeding to include the post-bleed inflammatory phase. At the 13^th Zürich Haemophilia Forum, an expert panel reviewed the rationale behind this strategy, explored its current use with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and considered treatment monitoring and optimisation. Two protocols are currently used for short-term episodic prophylaxis, both of which stipulate on-demand rFVIIa until resolution of bleeding, followed by daily dosing for ≥3 days to prevent re-bleeds. Short-term episodic prophylaxis should be individualised to optimise outcomes, perhaps through early treatment initiation or by combining rFVIIa with other treatments (e.g. factor VIII, tranexamic acid). Encouraging treatment compliance can also improve outcomes. Additionally, there is a need to develop objective clinical outcome measures, biomarkers and imaging protocols that can monitor treatment outcomes and joint disease in patients with inhibitors. A proactive approach incorporating a systematic package of care is needed. Currently, short-term episodic prophylaxis with rFVIIa may be an alternative treatment option to on-demand treatment for patients with inhibitors.

Increased burden on caregivers of having a child with haemophilia complicated by inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Having a child with a chronic disease often increases the burden in the family with more hospital visits, treatment administration, and increased worries for the ill child. A cross-sectional, international, multi-centre study in caregivers of children <18 years with haemophilia and inhibitor was performed at Haemophilia Treatment Centres in Sweden, UK, and Canada to evaluate caregivers' burden and their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to that of caregivers of children on prophylaxis without inhibitors and caregivers of healthy children.

METHODS

Caregivers of children with haemophilia completed several questionnaires (SF-36, Visual Analogue Scale of Interference (VAS), Caregivers' Burden Scale and Impact on Family Scale (IOF). Caregivers of healthy children completed only the SF-36. In addition, socio-demographic data were collected.

RESULTS

In total, 143 caregivers were included in the study. Comparing the two haemophilia groups with caregivers of healthy children revealed significant differences for all SF-34 domains except 'pain' and 'general health'. In Caregivers' Burden Scale, caregivers of children with inhibitors reported higher impact of haemophilia (P < 0.0001) and higher impact on VAS (P < 0.0001) compared to caregivers of children without inhibitors. In IOF, caregivers of children with inhibitors reported significant negative impact of the disease, except for aspect of coping.

CONCLUSION

Caregivers of children with inhibitors reported higher impact of the disease compared to caregivers of children with no inhibitors. No differences between mothers and fathers in the two groups for SF-36, Caregivers' Burden Scale, VAS and IOF, except for domain pain in SF-36 where mothers reported higher impairments.

Inherited abnormalities of coagulation: hemophilia, von Willebrand disease, and beyond

Bleeding disorders are broadly classified into primary and secondary hemostatic defects. Primary hemostatic disorders (disorders of platelets and von Willebrand factor) mainly result in mucocutaneous bleeding symptoms such as epistaxis, menorrhagia, petechiae, easy bruising, and bleeding after dental and surgical interventions. Secondary hemostatic disorders (congenital or acquired deficiencies of coagulation factors) typically manifest with delayed, deep bleeding into muscles and joints. This article provides a generalized overview of the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, laboratory abnormalities, and molecular basis of inherited abnormalities of coagulation with a focus on hemophilia, von Willebrand disease, and rare inherited coagulation disorders.

Real-world outcomes with recombinant factor VIIa treatment of acute bleeds in haemophilia patients with inhibitors: results from the international ONE registry

The ONE Registry (OR) was an international prospective observational study of on-demand recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) treatment for mild to moderate bleeds in haemophilia A/B patients with inhibitors. To describe real-world use of single and multi dose rFVIIa and to compare outcomes, including effectiveness, safety, quality of life and treatment satisfaction associated with treatment. Baseline data included demographics, treatment, medical and bleed history and patient/caregiver-reported outcomes regarding bleeds. rFVIIa was prescribed according to routine practice; regimens varied and initial dose was categorized as low (LD, ≤ 120 μg kg(-1) ), intermediate (ID, >120 and <250 μg kg(-1) ) or high (HD, ≥ 250 μg kg(-1) ). OR included 102 patients and 85 (83%) reported 494 bleeds overall. Mean age was 23 years (SD 16.4), with 52% ≥ 18 years. Majority of bleeds (n = 350, 71%) involved ≥ 1 joints; 46% involved a target joint. Median initial dose was 90 μg kg(-1) in LD (range 87-120, n = 156), 174 μg kg(-1) in ID, (range 121-249, n = 127) and 270 μg kg(-1) in HD, (range 250-375, n = 211). For spontaneous bleeds, effective haemostasis rate at 9 h was 63% LD, 60% ID and 56% HD. Rates of combined partially effective/effective haemostasis was 85% LD, 96% ID and 86% HD. Median number of doses in HD was one (range 1-7), compared with two in LD (range 1-17) and ID (range 1-23). No thromboembolic events were reported in 1145 doses given. These observational data in real life are consistent with previous studies which have shown similar overall effectiveness of rFVIIa and similar effectiveness and safety across different patterns of standard initial dosing.

Health-related quality of life in haemophilia patients with inhibitors and their caregivers

Data on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of congenital haemophilia patients with inhibitors (CHwI) and their caregivers are limited. To understand the association between patient demo-graphics/clinical characteristics with HRQoL among CHwI patients and caregivers, a survey was developed to assess HRQoL with haemophilia-specific QoL questionnaires (HAEMO-QoL/HAEM-A-QoL). In the cross-sectional study, paper-pencil questionnaires were mailed to 261 US CHwI patients/caregivers in July 2010. Descriptive analyses were performed to characterize HRQoL by age and to identify drivers of impairment, from both patient/caregiver perspectives. HRQoL scores were transformed on a scale of 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher impairment in HRQoL. Ninety-seven respondents completed the HRQoL assessment. HRQoL impairment was higher in adult patients. In children ages 8-16 years, mean HAEMO-QoL total score was 33.8 (SD = 15.5), and 35.0 (SD = 16.1) in children ages 4-7 years; for adult patients the mean HAEM-A-QoL total score was 42.2 (SD = 14.8). Adults reported highest impairment in the 'sports/leisure' subscale (Mean = 62.5, SD = 18.7), whereas patients 8-16 years reported highest impairment in the 'physical health' subscale (Mean = 50.8, SD = 30.5).Caregivers of patients ages 4-7 years reported greatest impairment within the 'family' subscale (Mean = 55.6, SD = 19.4). Caregivers were ''considerably/very much'' bothered by their child's inhibitors and reported higher QoL impairment for their child than parents who were not bothered. Within ChwI patients, HRQoL impairments increased with age and existed across a range of physical/psychosocial domains. In addition, caregiver burden also affected the perceived HRQoL of paediatric CHwI patients. Additional research is considered necessary to further understand the support caregivers need while caring for children with CHwI.

Treatment trends for haemophilia A and haemophilia B in the United States: results from the 2010 practice patterns survey

Frequent evaluation of haemophilia treatment is necessary to improve patient care. The 2010 Practice Patterns Survey (PPS) investigated current trends in haemophilia treatment in the United States, as reported by nurses. The aim was to document practice patterns for haemophilia A and haemophilia B Survey questionnaires were sent to nurses at haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) across the United States. Seventy-one of 126 HTCs (56%) responded to the survey. Factor dosage across treatment modalities ranged from 20 to 50 IU kg(-1) for severe haemophilia A. Dosage for severe haemophilia B was more variable (<40 to >100 IU kg(-1)). On-demand dosing regimens were inconsistent for haemophilia A and more so for haemophilia B. Rates of adherence to prescribed treatment were similar for both haemophilia types (∼80%). The main barrier to adherence was identified as inconvenience. More bleeding episodes occurred in adults (16.6 bleeding episodes per year) with severe haemophilia A than in younger patients (11.3 bleeding episodes per year) before switching patients to prophylaxis. For both haemophilia types, most patients who switched from prophylaxis to on-demand treatment were aged 13-24 years; these patients also had the lowest adherence (60-71%). More paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A and inhibitors (53%) received prophylactic bypassing therapy than their haemophilia B counterparts (38%). Adults with severe haemophilia A faced challenges in relation to co-morbidities and long-term care. This PPS provides insights into previously unexplored aspects of haemophilia care that will serve to increase awareness and promote discussion of current issues affecting haemophilia patient care.

Revisiting hemophilia management in acute medicine

The World Federation of Hemophilia estimates that more than 350,000 people globally have a form of the disease. Hemophilia A is a bleeding disorder that has a spectrum of manifestations ranging from persistent bleeding after minor trauma to spontaneous hemorrhage. We report a case of a male patient with hemophilia A who received general anesthesia for removal of foreign body from the nose. There was no excessive blood loss during surgery. Perioperatively, the patient received recombinant factor VIII coverage. Rest of the postoperative course was uneventful. Literature on the clinical management of patient with hemophilia A are reviewed and considerations for perioperative preparation and management of hemophilic patient are presented.

Hemophilia care in India: a review and experience from a tertiary care centre in uttar pradesh

Approximately 14,000 people with hemophilia are registered at the Hemophilia Federation of India; however, hemophilia remains under-diagnosed and many cases are not registered. In June 2009, the Government of Uttar Pradesh made anti-hemophilic factors available at a few centers, including the Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow. Consequently, the level of hemophilia care has improved considerably in recent times. Amongst the many challenges facing people with hemophilia, the development of inhibitors, which neutralize clotting factors provided by replacement therapy, is the most feared one. Healthcare professionals who treat people with hemophilia should not only be knowledgeable about the condition and committed to bettering the management of hemophilia, but also take responsibility for the judicious allocation of resources for various aspects of managing hemophilia. This manuscript aims to raise awareness regarding the detection and management of inhibitors in hemophilia based on the experience of a tertiary care hemophilia treatment centre in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of a glycoPEGylated recombinant activated factor VII derivative: a randomized first human dose trial in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Extensive research is currently ongoing to prolong the half-life of coagulation factors. One of these techniques is glycoPEGylation, which has also been applied to recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), resulting in a rFVIIa derivative (N7-GP) with a prolonged terminal half-life (t(1/2) ). The main clinical purpose of N7-GP is to provide safe and effective prophylaxis to patients with hemophilia and inhibitors. The prolonged t(1/2) of N7-GP can potentially reduce the dosing frequency and thereby facilitate convenience and compliance, which are two significant barriers to effective prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of single doses of N7-GP in healthy men.

METHODS

 A randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial with five cohorts (N7-GP dose of 12.5-100 μg kg(-1) ) was performed. In each cohort, eight subjects were randomized to receive N7-GP (n = 6) or placebo (n = 2).

RESULTS

The mean FVIIa activity was measurable for up to at least 72 h after dosing, and the overall mean t(1/2) for FVIIa activity was 15 h. The pharmacokinetics of N7-GP appeared to be dose-proportional in the dose range investigated. No serious adverse events (including thromboembolic events) were reported. The frequency of adverse events was similar in both the placebo and N7-GP groups. No neutralizing antibodies against N7-GP were detected. A pharmacologic effect was apparent from a dose-dependent statistically significant decrease in the mean prothrombin time in all N7-GP groups as compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

 N7-GP had a plasma half-life of 15 h and a profile that makes it a potential candidate for prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors.

The need for speed in the management of haemophilia patients with inhibitors

Rapid control of bleeding is the key to reducing bleeding complications and thereby preserving joint and musculoskeletal function in haemophilia patients with inhibitors. However, this requires early diagnosis following the onset of bleeding and strategies for rapid treatment in an outpatient setting. Overarching themes on the need for speed in managing bleeds in haemophilia patients were examined by a panel of clinicians experienced in managing inhibitor patients and joint disease during the Third Zürich Haemophilia Forum on 8 May 2009. This report summarizes the opinions of the panel on how to achieve rapid bleeding control in inhibitor patients and areas that were identified by the panel for future research or as needing new consensus guidelines. The consensus was that home treatment should be established for haemophilia patients with inhibitors, as it is associated with a faster time to treatment, as well as improvements in the quality of life of patients and their carers. In addition, as improved haemostatic control now allows inhibitor patients to participate in a wider range of physical activities, specific guidelines are required on which types of sport and work are appropriate. It was agreed that clear, systematic approaches are needed for early diagnosis of joint and muscle bleeds in inhibitor patients, which could facilitate rapid treatment. There may be opportunities for exploiting new diagnostic techniques from osteoarthritis to enable earlier diagnosis of haemophilic arthropathy. Overall, it was concluded that greater emphasis should be placed on education and patients' psychological needs, to enable inhibitor patients to cope up more effectively with their disease.