Retrospective radiological assessment of root canal treatment in young permanent dentition in a Turkish subpopulation

A 22-year follow-up cross-sectional study on periapical health in relation to the quality of root canal treatment in a Belgian population

AIM

To investigate the prevalence of apical periodontitis (AP) and the technical standard of root canal treatment in a Belgian population, assess the association of different variables with periapical status, and compare the results to a similar study conducted 22 years previously.

METHODOLOGY

In this cross-sectional study, 614 panoramic radiographs of first-time adult attendees at the Dental School of the University Hospital of Ghent were examined. Recorded patient-level parameters included gender, age, number of teeth, number of root filled teeth, presence of any AP lesion, and number of implants. The following tooth-level data were collected: tooth presence, coronal status, quality of coronal restoration, post presence, type of root-filling material, length and density of root filling, root-end filling material, presence of AP, and adjacent implant. Multivariable multilevel binary logistic regression was used to explore the association between patient and tooth characteristics and AP prevalence. Risk differences and confidence intervals were calculated to compare the present with the previous study.

RESULTS

The prevalence of AP at patient and tooth level was 46.9% and 5.6%, respectively. Fifty-one per cent of the 614 patients had at least one root filled tooth, and 5.9% of the 14 655 teeth studied were root filled. AP was found in 45% of root filled teeth. Fifty-four per cent of the root-filled teeth were rated as inadequate. Multivariable multilevel logistic regression revealed that more teeth, more implants, fewer root-filled teeth, adequate density, adequate coronal restoration, and no caries reduced the likelihood of AP. There were no statistically significant differences between the two studies regarding the prevalence of root-filled teeth or AP and the technical quality of root canal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of AP and the technical quality of root canal treatment in Belgium have not substantially changed over the last 22 years, despite the technological advancements and continuing education in the field.

Prevalence of Periapical Radiolucency and Conventional Root Canal Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies

Cross-sectional studies assess a population's health state and the prevalence of diseases or treatments. Few systematic reviews regarding the prevalence of periapical radiolucency (PARL) and nonsurgical root canal treatment (NSRCT) were conducted in the last decade. The goal of this study was to collect and review all updated and available cross-sectional studies that focus on the prevalence of both PARL and NSRCT in adult populations. It involves a systematic literature review of cross-sectional studies on the prevalence of PARL and NSRCT published from 1987 to 2022 in PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus with specific keywords used in the search process. A total of 52 articles were included in this systematic review. The majority of the included articles were from different populations. The overall prevalence of teeth with PARL was 43,522 (6.40%), while the prevalence of NSRCT teeth was 52,149 (7.67%). On the other hand, the overall prevalence of PARL in teeth that have received endodontic treatment and teeth that have not received endodontic treatment were 22,110 (3.25%) and 21,412 (3.15%), respectively. A meta-analysis was not performed due to underreporting of publication bias and the high degree of heterogeneity between studies. The overall risk of bias assessment revealed a low risk of bias in 25 (48%) of the included studies. The prevalence of NSRCT was higher at 7.67%, followed by PARL at approximately 6.40%. However, future studies are recommended to investigate the prevalence of both PARL and NSRCT in different patient populations.

Evaluation of endodontically treated teeth and related apical periodontitis using periapical and endodontic status scale: Retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical treatment quality and the status of apical pathology of endodontically treated teeth, as well as apical periodontitis (AP) prevalence, in a Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The CBCT images obtained between January 2018 and April 2020 were retrospectively examined. The quality of the endodontic treatments and the related periapical inflammatory lesions were classified according to the periapical and endodontic status scale (PESS). The data were statistically analysed using logistic regression, crosstabs and chi-square tests. AP was detected in 41% of 429 endodontically treated teeth. The prevalence of AP was significantly higher in teeth with inadequate root canal treatment compared with those with adequate treatment, 70.8% and 29.3%, respectively. Inadequate canal length and homogeneity, and complications were significantly associated with the prognostic periapical status scores of higher risk.

Prevalence of root canal treatment worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of root filled teeth (RFT) worldwide will inform about the amount of clinical activity of dentists dedicated to treat endodontic disease.

OBJECTIVES

To carry out a systematic review with meta-analysis answering the following question: What is the prevalence of RFT around the world? The percentage of people with at least one RFT was also investigated.

METHODS

A systematic review including population-based studies using the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE and Scielo. Studies related to prevalence of RFT were included. The outcome of interest of the study was the prevalence of RFT. The meta-analyses were calculated with the Open Meta Analyst software to determine the global prevalence of RFT. Subgroups analyses were performed comparing geographical distribution, radiographic method and year of the study (classified in 20th or 21th century). The prevalence of people with at least one RFT was also analysed.

RESULTS

Seventy-four population-based studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-eight, forty-four and two studies reported high, moderate and low risk of bias, respectively. No obvious publication bias was observed. Prevalence of RFT was estimated with 1 201 255 teeth and 32 162 patients. The calculated worldwide prevalence of RFT was 8.2% (95% CI = 7.3%-9.1%; p < .001). The global prevalence of people with at least one RFT was 55.7% (95% CI = 49.6%-61.8%; p < .001). In 20th century, the prevalence of RFT was 10.2% (95% CI = 7.9%-12.5%; p < .001), whereas in the 21st century the overall calculated prevalence of RFT was 7.5% (95% CI = 6.5%-8.6%; p < .001). Brazilian people (12%) and the European population (9.3%) showed the highest prevalence of RFT. In Europe, 59.6% (95% CI = 52.4%-66.8%) of people has at least one RFT.

CONCLUSIONS

This review showed that root canal treatment is a very common therapy throughout the world. More than half of the studied population have at least one RFT. A limitation of the present study is that most of the studies did not consider random sampling for population selection.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Systematic review registration number: (CRD42022329053).

A retrospective three-dimensional assessment of the prevalence of apical periodontitis and quality of root canal treatment in Mid-West Indian population

Introduction

This study aims to report a retrospective observation of the prevalence of apical periodontitis (AP) and quality of root canal treatment in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans among the Mid-West Indian population.

Materials and Methods

A total of 1229 CBCT scans were obtained across different CBCT centers in western India. After the exclusion criteria, those that were included were divided into broadly two groups - those that were filled and those that were unfilled. Various parameters were taken into account such as AP, length of the root canal filled, and coronal filling.

Results

There were a significantly higher percentage of nonfilled canals. Poor filling quality, inadequate coronal restoration, and also missed extra canal were significantly associated with AP. Both males and females showed higher presence of AP in the nonfilled teeth than filled ones (X2 - Chi square value M = 612.156, P < 0.00001, X² F = 1032.9092, P < 0.00001).

Conclusion

(1) The inadequacy of the filling of the root length was a contributory factor to the higher prevalence of AP among the study population. (2) The density of the filling and the quality of the coronal filling also significantly affected the successful outcome of the root canal treatment.

Deep learning for categorization of endodontic lesion based on radiographic periapical index scoring system

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to apply convolutional neural network (CNN) to score periapical lesion on an intraoral periapical radiograph (IOPAR) based on the periapical index (PAI) scoring system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 3000 periapical root areas (PRA) on 1950 digital IOPAR were pre-scored by three endodontists. This data was used to train the CNN model-"YOLO version 3." A total of 450 PRA was used for validation of the model. Data augmentation techniques and model optimization were applied. A total of 540 PRA on 250 digital IOPAR was used to test the performance of the CNN model.

RESULTS

A total of 303 PRA (56.11%) exhibited true prediction. PAI score 1 showed the highest true prediction (90.9%). PAI scores 2 and 5 exhibited the least true prediction (30% each). PAI scores 3 and 4 had a true prediction of 60% and 71%, respectively. When the scores were dichotomized as healthy (PAI scores 1 and 2) and diseased (PAI score 3, 4, and 5), the model achieved a true prediction of 76.6% and 92%, respectively. The model exhibited a 92.1% sensitivity/recall, 76% specificity, 86.4% positive predictive value/precision, and 86.1% negative predictive value. The accuracy, F1 score, and Matthews correlation coefficient were 86.3%, 0.89, and 0.71, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The CNN model trained on a limited amount of IOPAR data showed potential for PAI scoring of the periapical lesion on digital IOPAR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

An automated system for PAI scoring is developed that would potentially benefit clinician and researchers.

Prevalence of Lateral Radiolucency, Apical Root Resorption and Periapical Lesions in Portuguese Patients: A CBCT Cross-Sectional Study with a Worldwide Overview

Objective:

Apical periodontitis develops when bacteria, or their by products, migrate from the infected root canal system space to the surrounding apical tissues. The objective of the present multi-center cross-sectional study was to analyze the prevalence of lateral radiolucency, apical root resorption and periapical lesions in 7 districts of Portugal using cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) assessment.

Methods:

A total of 1,249 CBCT scans, from 11 dental clinics, were screened. Data regarding 22,899 teeth was included. For each tooth the recorded data was the presence of lateral radiolucency, apical root resorption, periapical lesions, previous root canal treatment, missed root canals, length of root canal filling (short, good or overfilling) and type of coronal restoration (intact tooth, non-restored, filling or crown). Differences between districts were tested using chi-squared. A P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results:

The proportion of lateral radiolucency ranged between 0.0% (Aveiro, Braga and Coimbra) and 0.9% (Lisbon), while the prevalence of apical root resorption ranged from 0.0% (Braga and Coimbra) to 3.0% in Setubal. The nationwide proportion of lateral radiolucency was 0.4%, while for apical root resorption was 1.1%. The prevalence of periapical lesions varied from 4.1% (Braga) and 13.0% (Lisbon) with a nationwide proportion of 10.0%. Significant differences were noted between districts (P<0.05).

Conclusion:

The prevalence of lateral radiolucency and apical root resorption were low in all districts. Root canal filled teeth were associated with higher periapical lesions proportions than non-treated teeth. Independently of the assessed district, the periapical status may be influenced by both quality of the endodontic treatment and coronal restoration.

The global prevalence of apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Apical periodontitis (AP) frequently presents as a chronic asymptomatic disease. To arrive at a true diagnosis, in addition to the clinical examination, it is mandatory to undertake radiographic examinations such as periapical or panoramic radiographs, or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Thus, the worldwide burden of AP is probably underestimated or unknown. Previous systematic reviews attempted to estimate the prevalence of AP, but none have investigated which factors may influence its prevalence worldwide.

OBJECTIVES

To assess: (i) the prevalence of AP in the population worldwide, as well as the frequency of AP in all teeth, nontreated teeth and root filled teeth; (ii) which factors can modify the prevalence of AP.

METHODS

A search was conducted in the PubMed-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane-CENTRAL, LILACS, Google scholar and OpenGrey databases, followed by hand searches, until September 2019. Cross-sectional, case-control and cohort studies reporting the prevalence of AP in humans, using panoramic or periapical radiograph or CBCT as image methods were included. No language restriction was applied. An adaptation of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled prevalence of AP at the individual level. Secondary outcomes were the frequency of AP in all teeth, nontreated teeth and rootfilled teeth. Subgroup analyses using random-effect models were carried out to analyse the influence of explanatory covariables on the outcome.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 6670 articles, and 114 studies were included in the meta-analysis, providing data from 34 668 individuals and 639 357 teeth. The prevalence of AP was 52% at the individual level (95% CI 42%-56%, I²  = 97.8%) and 5% at the tooth level (95% CI 4%-6%; I²  = 99.5%). The frequency of AP in root-filled teeth and nontreated teeth was 39% (95% CI 36%-43%; I²  = 98.5%) and 3% (95% CI 2%-3%; I²  = 99.3%), respectively. The prevalence of AP was greater in samples from dental care services (DCS; 57%; 95% CI 52%-62%; I²  = 97.8%) and hospitals (51%; 95% CI 40%-63%; I²  = 95.9%) than in those from the general population (GP; 40%; 95% CI 33%-46%; I²  = 96.5%); it was also greater in people with a systemic condition (63%; 95% CI 56%-69%, I²  = 89.7%) compared to healthy individuals (48%; 95% CI 43%-53%; I²  = 98.3%).

DISCUSSION

The subgroup analyses identified explanatory factors related to the variability in the prevalence of AP. However, the high clinical heterogeneity and high risk of bias across the primary studies indicate that the findings must be interpreted with caution.

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the adult population worldwide have at least one tooth with apical periodontitis. The prevalence of AP is greater in samples from the dental care services, but it is also high amongst community representative samples from the general population. The present findings should bring the attention of health policymakers, medical and dental communities to the hidden burden of endodontic disease in the population worldwide.

Two-dimensional Periapical, Panoramic Radiography Versus Three-dimensional Cone-beam Computed Tomography in the Detection of Periapical Lesion After Endodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review

Radiographic imaging is a common resource for endodontic diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Two-dimensional (2D) periapical and digital panoramic radiographs often showed image distortion; this issue was resolved with the emergence of three-dimensional (3D) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). This review examines the accuracy of various radiographic techniques in the assessment of periapical lesion after endodontic treatment. Our goal was to determine whether a 2D radiograph (periapical and panoramic) is as accurate as a 3D radiograph (i.e., CBCT) in the assessment of periapical lesion after endodontic treatment. We searched the electronic databases Medline and Cochrane and trial registries for ongoing trials. We included both retrospective and prospective studies comparing the efficacy of periapical healing with various radiographic techniques after endodontic treatment. The outcome of interest was the percentage detection of periapical lesions and periapical healing assessment after endodontic treatment. All data were collected using a specially designed extraction form. We assessed the risk of bias in the studies using the Cochrane tool for diagnostic tests (QUADAS). We judged two studies to be at low risk and two to be at moderate risk of bias. Although there was a difference in the percentage detection of periapical healing efficacy by various radiographic techniques, all studies reported that CBCT had higher accuracy in the detection of periapical lesions compared to periapical and panoramic radiography. The next best choice is periapical radiographs, followed by panoramic radiographs as they provide better visualization and accuracy.

Impact of orthodontic treatment on the integrity of endodontically treated teeth

AIM

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the periapical status of endodontically treated teeth and the integrity of endodontic treatment before and after orthodontic treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted by evaluating 128 teeth with root canal treatment (RCT). The teeth were obtained from 72 patients (23 males, 49 females) who had undergone fixed orthodontic treatment. Panoramic radiographs were taken and were evaluated before the start and after the completion of orthodontic treatment. Apical periodontitis (AP) was evaluated by the periapical index (PAI) and the probability index (PRI) of periapical bone destruction. Other variables related to the quality of root canal fillings were included, such as RCT quality index, length, and homogeneity, and coronal restoration.

RESULTS

According to the PRI, the proportion of teeth with periapical bone destruction was significantly higher after orthodontic treatment. Overall, there was no significant change in the PAI scores after orthodontic treatment. However, the quality of the endodontic treatment moderated the change in the PAI score, as well as the change in the PRI. There was no significant increase in PAI and PRI scores after orthodontic treatment for adequately treated teeth. However, the risk for periapical lesions and bone destruction after orthodontic treatment was significantly increased for teeth receiving inadequate endodontic treatment compared with those receiving adequate endodontic treatment.

CONCLUSION

Increased PAI and PRI after orthodontic treatment correlated with the quality of endodontic treatment.

Apical periodontitis in southern Estonian population: prevalence and associations with quality of root canal fillings and coronal restorations

Background

Apical periodontitis (AP) is an inflammatory disease around the apex of a tooth root. Reported prevalence of AP ranges from 27% to 83% while the data about most post-Soviet countries are still missing. Knowing the prevalence of AP within a certain population helps to plan the treatment need and evaluate the success of endodontic interventions. We aimed to collect data about prevalence and determining factors of AP for the first time in Estonia.

Methods

The cross-sectional study included 6552 patients (age 35.5±19.2 years). Radiographic examination was applied to investigate the prevalence of AP and quality of endodontic treatment.

Results

AP was diagnosed in 54.7% of subjects. Endodontically treated teeth were present in 58.2% of subjects. Periapical finding was present in 44.6% of endodontically treated and in 30.8% of untreated teeth.

Out of 181,495 teeth, 52.7% were intact. AP was diagnosed in 6.3% of teeth, 6.9% of teeth were endodontically treated.

Risk factors for AP included caries (OR = 2.30), male gender (OR = 1.44), too short (OR = 1.76) or too long root canal filling (OR = 2.51), root canal filling of low density (OR = 1.61) while not orthodontic appliance. Lower AP risk was associated with restoration of the tooth – filling (OR = 0.45), crown (OR = 0.34) and bridge (OR = 0.33).

Conclusions

AP is highly prevalent in Southern Estonian population. Most cases are associated with root canal-treated teeth. The overall quality of root canal fillings tends to be low, consistent with the mediocre outcome of treatment. Considerable efforts are required to improve the standards of endodontic treatment.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-017-0429-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Radiologic assessment of quality of root canal fillings and periapical status in an Austrian subpopulation - An observational study

Background/Objective

Progress in endodontic techniques and methodological advances have altered root canal therapy over the last decades. These techniques and methods need periodical documentation. This observational study determined the current prevalence of endodontic treatments, and investigated the relationship of various factors with the periapical status in a Lower Austrian subpopulation.

Methodology

One thousand orthopantomograms of first-time university adult patients radiographed at an outpatient clinic were evaluated. For each tooth, the presence of periradicular pathosis and/or endodontic treatment was recorded, as was the quality of (post-)endodontic treatment (homogeneity and length of root canal fillings; preparation failures; posts/screws; apicoectomies; coronal restorations). Two evaluators, blinded to each other, scored all teeth. In cases of disagreement, they joined for a consensus score.

Results

In all, 22,586 teeth were counted. Of these, 2,907 teeth (12.9%) had periapical pathosis, while 2,504 teeth had undergone root canal treatment. Of the endodontically treated teeth, 52% showed no radiographic signs of apical periodontitis, while 44.9% had overt apical lesions, and 3,1% revealed widened periodontal ligament space. The majority of the root canal fillings was inhomogeneous (70.4%); 75.4% were rated too short, and 3.8% too long. The presence of apical pathosis was significantly correlated (odds ratio (OR) 2.556 [confidence interval (CI) 2.076–3.146]; P<0.0001) with poor root canal fillings (length and homogeneity). Posts or screws positively affected periapical status (OR 1.853 [CI 1.219–2.819]; P = 0.004), but endodontically treated posterior teeth were infrequently restored (posts, 7.5%; screws, 2.7%). Best results were found for teeth with both appropriate endodontic treatment and adequate coronal restoration.

Conclusion

A high prevalence of periradicular radiolucencies was observed with root canal filled teeth, along with high numbers of unmet treatment needs. Periapical health was associated with adequate root canal obturation and high-grade postendodontic restorations, and quality regarding these latter aspects is considered mandatory to promote periapical health.

Apical periodontitis and the technical quality of root canal treatment in an adult sub-population in London

AIM

To assess the prevalence of apical periodontitis (AP) and the technical quality of root canal treatment in an adult sub-population in London.

METHODOLOGY

Panoramic radiographs of 136 patients who attended a dental hospital were collected. The periapical health of teeth present was assessed radiographically and the presence or absence of AP noted. The technical quality of the root canal treatment was scored as adequate or inadequate, based on the European Society of Endodontology (2006) guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 3,396 teeth were assessed; AP was detected in 4.1% of the teeth. Forty-nine percent of patients had at least one tooth with radiographic evidence of AP. The percentage of root filled teeth with AP was 38.3%. AP was significantly more frequently found in root treated, compared with non-root treated, teeth (p <0.001). In 44.3% of the cases, the technical quality of the root canal filling was inadequate. AP was detected in 14% of adequately, compared with 68.6% of inadequately, root filled teeth. There is a significant negative correlation between the technical quality of root canal treatment and the presence of AP (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a high prevalence of AP and poor technical quality root canal treatment; a strong association between AP and root filled teeth, and between the periapical health and the technical quality of the root canal treatment. The results are consistent with previous studies using similar methodology and re-confirmed that high technical quality root canal treatment is crucial to ensure a favourable treatment outcome.