Warfarin management after discharge from hospital: a qualitative analysis

High-risk medication in community care: a scoping review

PURPOSE

To review the international literature related to high-risk medication (HRM) in community care, in order to (1) define a definition of HRM and (2) list the medication that is considered HRM in community care.

METHODS

Scoping review: Five databases were systematically searched (MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Web Of Science, and Cochrane) and extended with a hand search of cited references. Two researchers reviewed the papers independently. All extracted definitions and lists of HRM were subjected to a self-developed quality appraisal. Data were extracted, analysed and summarised in tables. Critical attributes were extracted in order to analyse the definitions.

RESULTS

Of the 109 papers retrieved, 36 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Definitions for HRM in community care were used inconsistently among the papers, and various recurrent attributes of the concept HRM were used. Taking the recurrent attributes and the quality score of the definitions into account, the following definition could be derived: "High-risk medication are medications with an increased risk of significant harm to the patient. The consequences of this harm can be more serious than those with other medications". A total of 66 specific medications or categories were extracted from the papers. Opioids, insulin, warfarin, heparin, hypnotics and sedatives, chemotherapeutic agents (excluding hormonal agents), methotrexate and hypoglycaemic agents were the most common reported HRM in community care.

CONCLUSION

The existing literature pertaining to HRM in community care was examined. The definitions and medicines reported as HRM in the literature are used inconsistently. We suggested a definition for more consistent use in future research and policy. Future research is needed to determine more precisely which definitions should be considered for HRM in community care.

Assessing patient satisfaction with the Medication Management Review service delivered in Jordan

Objective

To investigate the effect of the Medication Management Review (MMR) service on the number of treatment-related problems (TRPs), patient satisfaction and factors affecting patient satisfaction.

Methods

This prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at community pharmacies in Amman, Jordan. Eligible patients were randomized into active and control groups. A validated Pharmaceutical Care Manual was used for data collection and to identify TRPs for both groups. Identified TRPs for patients in the active group were resolved at the pharmacist level or sent to the patients’ physicians for approval and implementation. Patients in both groups were followed up at 3 months to determine the number of TRPs end of the study. Patients in the active group completed a validated, Likert scale MMR-satisfaction questionnaire. Factors affecting satisfaction were assessed through multiple regression analysis.

Key findings

Outpatients with chronic conditions (n = 160) were recruited into the study, with mean age 53.01 ± 15.39; mean number of medical conditions of 3.56 ± 1.15 and 4.73 ± 1.79 mean number of medications. A mean number of 5.37 ± 3.01 TRPs per patient was identified, with no significant difference between both groups (active group n = 82, 5.57 ± 2.68; control n = 78, 5.18 ± 3.36, P = 0.412). At follow-up, significantly lower number of TRPs were identified for patients in the active group compared to patients in the control group (1.06 ± 1.30 versus 4.53 ± 3.43, P < 0.001). Majority of patients were satisfied/very satisfied with the service (n = 77, 94.5%). A lower number of TRPs at follow-up (B = −0.438; t = −4.477, P < 0.001) and higher number of TRPs agreed upon and implemented (B = 0.553; t = 6.949, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher level of patient satisfaction.

Conclusion

The MMR has proven to be an effective pharmaceutical care service when delivered in a developing country, such as Jordan. It led to high patient satisfaction, which was significantly associated with lower number of TRPs at follow-up.

Living with Atrial Fibrillation: An Analysis of Patients' Perspectives

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the perceptions of patients with atrial fibrillation regarding the disease, to reveal their feelings, thoughts and wishes, and to investigate their perspectives and coping behaviors towards their condition.

METHODS

Phenomenological methodology was used. The study population consisted of a total of 225 patients treated by the cardiology department of a university hospital, while the study sample consisted of 32 patients who met the inclusion criteria. A semistructured interview addressed perceptions of patients with atrial fibrillation regarding the disease. Data were collected by asking the participants the three questions on the In-depth Individual Interview Form. Data were analyzed using the continuous comparative method of Colaizzi.

RESULTS

In the study sample, 50.0% of participants were female, 69.0% were married, and the mean age was 66.90 years (± 7.90 years). As a result of the content analysis, four main themes and 15 subthemes were identified: patient's mental status regarding the disease, patient's social status regarding the disease, patient's physical condition regarding the disease, and disease management and coping with the disease. The study found that individuals with atrial fibrillation faced major limitations in their daily living activities and social lives due to the disease symptoms and warfarin use.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients need to be provided with relevant individual training and counselling so that they lead more satisfactory lives. In addition, appropriate health appointment and monitoring systems should be developed for patients to reduce the problems associated with frequent follow-up appointments.

Anticoagulation education: do patients understand potential medication-related emergencies?

BACKGROUND

The Joint Commission Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) National Hospital Inpatient Quality Measure VTE-5 outlines four criteria for discharge patient education when starting anticoagulation (usually, warfarin) therapy. The criteria do not specify content regarding patient recognition of potentially dangerous warfarin-related scenarios. A study was conducted to investigate how well patients assess the risks and consequences of potential warfarin-related safety threats.

METHODS

From an adult population on long-term warfarin, 480 patients were randomly selected for a telephone-based survey. Warfarin-knowledge questions were drawn from a previous survey; warfarin-associated risk scenarios were developed via focus interviews. Expert anticoagulation pharmacists categorized each scenario as urgent, moderately urgent, or not urgent, as did survey participants.

RESULTS

For the 184 patients (38% completion rate), the mean knowledge score was 69% (standard deviation [SD], 0.20). Overall classification accuracy of situational urgency was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57.3%-60.3%). Respondents overestimated non-urgent-severity situations 23% of the time (95% CI, 20.8%-24.7%), while underestimating urgent-severity situations 21% of the time (95% CI, 19.0%-23.9%). A significant percentage of patients failed to recognize the urgency of stroke symptoms (for example, loss of vision), the risk of bleeding after incidental head trauma, or medication mismanagement.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite fair factual warfarin knowledge, participants did not appear to recognize well the clinical severity of warfarin-associated scenarios. Warfarin education programs should incorporate patient-centered strategies to teach recognition of high-risk situations that compromise patient safety.