Is sugar consumption detrimental to health? A review of the evidence 1995-2006

Many countries set quantitative targets for added sugars, justifying this by expressing concern about the likely impact of sugar on weight control, dental health, diet quality, or metabolic syndrome. This review considers whether current intakes of sugar are harmful to health, and analyses recent literature using a systematic approach to collate, rank, and evaluate published studies from 1995-2006. Results from high quality obesity studies did not suggest a positive association between body mass index and sugar intake. Some studies, specifically on sweetened beverages, highlighted a potential concern in relation to obesity risk, although these were limited by important methodological issues. Diet adequacy appeared to be achieved across sugar intakes of 6 to 20% energy, depending on subject age. Studies on metabolic syndrome reported no adverse effects of sugar in the long-term, even at intakes of 40-50% energy. The evidence for colorectal cancer suggested an association with sugar, but this appeared to have been confounded by energy intake and glycemic load. There was no credible evidence linking sugar with attention-deficit, dementia, or depression. Regarding dental caries, combinations of sugar amount/frequency, fluoride exposure, and food adhesiveness were more reliable predictors of caries risk than the amount of sugar alone. Overall, the available evidence did not support a single quantitative sugar guideline covering all health issues.

Sources of total, non-milk extrinsic, and intrinsic and milk sugars in the diets of older adults living in sheltered accommodation

The WHO recommends limiting non-milk extrinsic sugars (NMES) consumption to < or = 10 % energy to reduce the risk of unhealthy weight gain and dental caries, and to restrict frequency of intake to < or = 4 times/d to reduce risk of dental caries. Older adults, especially those from low-income backgrounds, are at increased risk of dental caries, yet there is little information on sugars intake (frequency of intake and food sources) in this age group. The aim of this report is to present baseline data from a community-based dietary intervention study of older adults from socially deprived areas of North East England, on the quantity and sources of total sugars, NMES, and intrinsic and milk sugars, and on frequency of NMES intake. Dietary intake was assessed using two 3-d estimated food diaries, completed by 201 participants (170 female, thirty-one male) aged 65-85 years (mean 76.7 (sd 5.5) years) recruited from sheltered housing schemes. Total sugars represented 19.6 %, NMES 9.3 %, and intrinsic and milk sugars 10.3 % of daily energy intake. Eighty-one (40.3 %) exceeded the NMES intake recommendation. Mean frequency of NMES intake was 3.4 times/d. The fifty-three participants (26.4 %) who exceeded the frequency recommendation ( < or = 4 times/d) obtained a significantly greater percentage of energy from NMES compared with those participants who met the recommendation. The food groups 'biscuits and cakes' (18.9 %), 'soft drinks' (13.1 %) and 'table sugar' (11.1 %) made the greatest contributions to intakes of NMES. Interventions to reduce NMES intake should focus on limiting quantity and frequency of intake of these food groups.

Review of methods used to estimate non-milk extrinsic sugars

BACKGROUND

Those sugars in foods, which are potentially damaging to dental health, were classified by the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy (COMA) as non-milk extrinsic sugars (NMES). The NMES include sugars outside the cellular structure of a food, excluding the sugars naturally present in milk and milk products. The NMES should contribute no more than 10% of energy intake (Department of Health, 1991). A number of studies have been published where NMES content of foods has been estimated. The purpose of this study was to carry out a comprehensive literature review using a methodical search strategy in order to identify the different methods that have been used for NMES estimation.

METHODS

Databases searched were MEDLINE, EMBASE, Health-CD and Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC) (as sources of UK government and other official publications).

RESULTS

In total, 32 publications were found in which NMES values were reported and five different methods to estimate NMES were identified. No published method provided sufficient information to clearly differentiate between methods and inadequate detail was given to support replication of any of the methods. Of these five methods, The Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) have published three different descriptions of methods of NMES estimation used in UK national dietary surveys published since 1989. However, one method has been described consistently in the National Diet and Nutrition surveys published since 1994.

CONCLUSIONS

A single, uniform approach to the estimation of NMES for application in nutritional surveys is essential for cross-comparison between surveys. The results show that there is a clear need for one standardized approach for the estimation of NMES in foods.

Assessment of advice to reduce dietary fat and non-milk extrinsic sugar in a free-living male population

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of advice to reduce both dietary fat and sugar with advice to reduce fat alone on subsequent dietary intake in Scottish men.

DESIGN

A parallel design intervention study was employed to measure compliance to the two types of dietary advice. Subjects were randomly assigned to Group 1 (advice to reduce fat and non-milk extrinsic (NME) sugar), Group 2 (advice to reduce fat only, ad libitum sugar) or a control Group 0 (no advice). Compliance was assessed by two 4-day food diaries over 6 months.

SETTING

The study was conducted in the Strathclyde area of Scotland.

SUBJECTS

Subjects were normal to moderately overweight Scottish men. The men recruited were non-dieting and volunteered for a 'healthy eating' study with the aim to improve the 'healthiness' of their diet.

RESULTS

Groups 1 and 2 achieved the dietary target for fat, reducing their mean intake to below 35% energy. Group 1 achieved a statistically significant reduction in percentage energy from NME sugar in the short term (6 weeks), decreasing their mean intake from 9.9% to 7.2% energy. This initial decrease appeared to slip back towards baseline levels at 6 months (8.1% energy from NME sugar) and was no longer significantly different from baseline. At 6 months Group 1 reported a significantly lower mean energy intake than at baseline, whereas Group 2 adjusted for an initial decrease in energy intake and by 6 months energy intakes were not significantly different from baseline intakes. Group 2 appeared to compensate for the absolute reduction in dietary fat with a slight increase in total sugars and the maintenance of NME sugar intakes.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects in Group 1 complied with advice to reduce both fat and sugar over 6 weeks but to a lesser extent over 6 months. The 1.8% reduction in percentage energy from NME sugars in Group 1 at 6 months may not have reached significance due to the small sample size. Alternatively it may be that free-living populations find it hard to maintain concurrent reductions in fat and sugar owing to the well-documented inverse relationship between intakes of these macronutrients when expressed as a proportion of energy.