Brainstem Viral-like Encephalitis as a Possible Cause of a Gastroduodenal Motility Disorder: A Case Report

Analysis of fasting antroduodenal manometry in children

Antroduodenal manometry has been used to determine the pathophysiology associated with signs and symptoms of gastrointestinal motility disorders. The diagnostic value of antroduodenal manomentry has been limited by the paucity of data from normal children. In this study, we compared antroduodenal manometry findings from 95 patients with symptoms suggesting a gastrointestinal motility disorder to 20 control children. Phase III of the migrating motor complex (MMC) was less frequent in patients (P < 0.05), especially in those who required total parenteral nutrition (P < 0.001), than in controls. Abnormal migration of phase III and short intervals between phase IIIs were more frequent in patients than in controls (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). During phase II, persistent low-amplitude contractions and sustained tonic-phasic contraction were found only in parenteral-nutrition-dependent children. Short or prolonged duration of phase III, absence of phase I following phase III, tonic contractions during phase III, low amplitude of phase III contractions in a single recording site and clusters of contractions or prolonged propagating contractions during phase II were not more frequent in patients than in controls. We conclude that there are five manometric features having a clear association with pediatric gastrointestinal motility disorders: (1) absence of phase III of the MMC, (2) abnormal migration of phase III, (3) short intervals between phase III episodes, (4) persistent low-amplitude contractions, and (5) sustained tonic-phasic contractions.

Gastric and small intestinal motility in health and disease

Although symptoms possibly related to motor dysfunction appear to be common, primary disorders of the foregut motor apparatus, defined on the basis of a discrete myoneural pathology, are notably rare. This phenomenon may as much reflect the relatively primitive nature of diagnostic methods as the true rarity of such disorders. Although diagnostic methodologies increase in sophistication and availability, their clinical impact has been limited by an imperfect relationship between symptoms and dysfunction and by a relatively poor ability of such tests to predict response to available therapeutic strategies. An ever-increasing understanding of the complex, often interrelated motor and sensory phenomena that contribute to symptoms, together with the development of consensus on the use and interpretation of motility tests and the more widespread application of sophisticated histologic, immunologic, biochemical, and molecular biologic methodologies to the study of these disorders, should lead, in the years to come, to much needed progress in this area.