Monoclonal antibody treatment to prolong the secondary cardiac allograft survival in alloantigen-primed mice

TCF1highPD-1+Ly108+CD8+ T Cells Are Associated with Graft Preservation in Sensitized Mice Treated with Non-Fc Receptor-Binding CD3 Antibodies

The non-Fc-binding anti-CD3 Ab [anti-CD3F(ab')2] can induce graft acceptance depending on the therapeutic window in a rodent heart transplant model. The delayed protocol allows for early graft infiltration of lymphocytes, which may behave in an inhibitory manner. We investigated the most effective protocol for anti-CD3F(ab')2 in sensitized conditions to confirm the evidence for clinical application. C57BL/6 mice were sensitized with BALB/c tail skin grafts and transplanted with BALB/c heart grafts at 8-12 wk after sensitization. Fifty micrograms of anti-CD3F(ab')2 was administered daily for 5 consecutive days on days 1-5 (day 1 protocol) or days 3-7 (delayed protocol). In nonsensitized mice, the delayed protocol significantly prolonged graft survival after transplantation from BALB/c to naive B6 (median survival time [MST], >100 d). In contrast, the delayed protocol was unable to prevent graft rejection in sensitized mice (MST, 5 d). A significantly increased percentage of granzyme B+ CD8+ T cells was observed in the graft on day 3 posttransplantation in sensitized conditions. Further, the day 1 protocol significantly prolonged graft survival (MST, 18 d), even in sensitized conditions. Day 1 treatment significantly increased the percentage of Foxp3+CD25+CD4+ T cells and phenotypically changed CD8+ T cells in the graft (i.e., caused a significant increase in the proportion of Ly108+TCF1highPD-1+CD8+ T cells). In conclusion, different timings of delayed anti-CD3F(ab')2 treatment promoted allograft preservation in association with phenotypic changes in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the graft under sensitized conditions.

Combined treatment with vitamin D3 and antibody agents suppresses secondary heart transplant rejection in the early postoperative period

BACKGROUND

Accelerated transplant rejection mediated by donor reactive memory T cells is another barrier to the induction of graft tolerance. The aim of this study was to investigate the immunosuppressing effects of vitamin D (1,25(OH)2D3), administered alone or in combination with a costimulatory blockade treatment, on rejection of secondary heart allografts in a mouse model.

METHODS

Circular full-thickness skin grafts from BALB/c mice were cut and grafted onto the lumbar regions of C57BL/6 mice as allo-primed recipients. Four weeks after skin grafting, the vascularized hearts from the BALB/c mice were transplanted heterotopically into the allo-primed recipients using a non-suture cuff technique. The recipients were then randomly divided into four groups and given either intraperitoneal injection of isotype, Ab, 1,25(OH)2D3, or a combination of Ab and 1,25(OH)2D3. Allograft incidence was determined by hematoxylin-eosin staining, and cytokine expression was assessed by the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and cytometric bead arrays. Spleen cells from the recipient were used to assess mixed lymphocyte reactions. Memory T cells and regulatory T cells (Tregs) in spleen cells were measured by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The median allograft survival time was longer with the combined treatment with Ab and 1,25(OH)2D3 than with no treatment or with treatment with Ab or 1,25(OH)2D3 alone. The grafts were protected from infiltration by inflammatory cells and by inhibition of interleukin 2 and interferon gamma expression. Rejection was initially suppressed in the early postoperative period by a reduction in the number of memory T cells and induction of Foxp3⁺ Tregs, but this effect disappeared by day 15 after transplantation upon withdrawal of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Vitamin D3 administered as an immunosuppressive agent, when combined with monoclonal antibody treatment, may protect heart grafts from memory T cell responses in a secondary heart transplant model.

Integrin antagonists prevent costimulatory blockade-resistant transplant rejection by CD8(+) memory T cells

The success of belatacept in late-stage clinical trials inaugurates the arrival of a new class of immunosuppressants based on costimulatory blockade, an immunosuppression strategy that disrupts essential signals required for alloreactive T-cell activation. Despite having improved renal function, kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept experienced increased rates of acute rejection. This finding has renewed focus on costimulatory blockade-resistant rejection and specifically the role of alloreactive memory T cells in mediating this resistance. To study the mechanisms of costimulatory blockade-resistant rejection and enhance the clinical efficacy of costimulatory blockade, we developed an experimental transplant system that models a donor-specific memory CD8(+) T-cell response. After confirming that graft-specific memory T cells mediate costimulatory blockade-resistant rejection, we characterized the role of integrins in this rejection. The resistance of memory T cells to costimulatory blockade was abrogated when costimulatory blockade was coupled with either anti-VLA-4 or anti-LFA-1. Mechanistic studies revealed that in the presence of costimulatory blockade, anti-VLA-4 impaired T-cell trafficking to the graft but not memory T-cell recall effector function, whereas anti-LFA-1 attenuated both trafficking and memory recall effector function. As antagonists against these integrins are clinically approved, these findings may have significant translational potential for future clinical transplant trials.

Changes in the number of circulating TCM and TEM subsets in renal transplantation: relationship with acute rejection and induction therapy

Effector (T_EM) and central memory (T_CM) T cells have been recently described as the main memory T-cell subsets generated after primary immune response, with a potential role in graft rejection after rechallenge with alloantigen. Because of their effector function, they could be involved in driving the response against the allograft, leading to rejection. In this study, we sought to investigate the different memory T-cell subpopulations in peripheral blood from a cohort of 90 patients who underwent consecutive renal transplant, and their association with acute rejection (AR) episodes and induction therapy. Twenty-one of them were monitored in the short term during the first 2 months after transplantation. Three of them suffered an AR but no changes in the circulating levels of either CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T_EM were observed as compared with rejection-free renal transplant patients. In total, 69 patients out of 90 were monitored in the long term. Even 2 years after transplantation, maintained increased numbers of peripheral blood CD4⁺ T_EM were observed in patients suffering with AR. Interestingly, induction therapy with thymoglobulin, but not with basiliximab, produced an increase in circulating CD4⁺ T_EM cells at 6 months after transplantation. In conclusion, our data suggest that AR episodes favor the induction of T_EM cells in the periphery of renal transplant patients in the long term. It remains to be determined whether such an effect has any impact on long-term renal transplantation.