Comparative therapeutic studies with Tilavist

Vernal conjunctivitis

Vernal conjunctivitis is a bilateral, seasonal, external ocular inflammatory disease of unknown cause. Afflicted patients experience intense itching, tearing, photophobia, and mucous discharge, and usually demonstrate large cobblestone papillae on their superior tarsal conjunctiva and limbal conjunctiva. It primarily affects children, may be related to atopy, and has environmental and racial predilections. Although usually self-limited, vernal conjunctivitis can result in potentially blinding corneal complications. Treatment of chronic forms of ocular allergies may necessitate collaborative efforts between the ophthalmologist and the allergist or immunologist.

Implementation of guidelines for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis is a common disease altering quality of life. Its treatment is well established and guidelines have been proposed. However, their efficacy has never been tested. The aim of the study was to validate the guidelines of the International Consensus on Rhinitis in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

A multicenter, multinational, open label, parallel, randomized study compared two therapeutic strategies in seasonal allergic rhinitis during a 3-week treatment. General practitioners were randomized into two groups. In the first group of 224 patients, doctors followed guidelines from the International Consensus on Rhinitis. Depending on the severity of nasal and ocular symptoms defined using visual analogue scales, patients received ebastine (an oral antihistamine), triamcinolone acetonide (a topical corticosteroid) and/or ophthalmic nedocromil sodium (a topical ocular cromone). In the second group of 241 patients, general practitioners had a free choice of treatment. The primary efficacy end points were quality of life measured using the standardized rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ) and the symptom-medication scores assessed daily with an electronic dairy system.

RESULTS

Adjusted mean total symptom scores over 21 days were 4.93 in the guidelines strategy group compared with 7.48 in the free-choice treatment group (P = 0.0001). Mean total scores in the RQLQ decreased by 2.19 in the guidelines group compared with a decrease of 1.79 in the free-choice treatment group (P = 0.0001). At 21 days, the least square mean difference in improvement in overall scores for RQLQ in the guidelines group compared with the free-choice treatment group was 0.53, which was greater than the minimal important difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis often present severe symptoms which are not well recognized or controlled by physicians using their own criteria of severity and treatment. Using a simple method for the evaluation of the severity and a simple therapeutic scheme based on International Guidelines, patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis presented a significant improvement by comparison with those receiving a non-standardized treatment.

Ocular Allergic Disease: Mechanisms, Disease Sub-types, Treatment

Ocular allergy refers to a variety of hypersensitivity disorders that affect the lid, conjunctiva, and/or cornea. Its incidence is estimated at over 20% of the general population in the United States. This review will discuss the various forms of ocular allergy, their pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment. New frontiers in mechanisms, therapy, and management in the office are emphasized throughout.

Supplementation of fexofenadine therapy with nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution to treat ocular symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis

PURPOSE

Ocular symptoms are often under-treated in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. The efficacy of fexofenadine hydrochloride 60 mg capsules supplemented with nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution was evaluated to determine the optimal drug regimen for control of ocular allergic symptoms.

METHODS

In this 5-week, open-label, randomized, multicentre comparative study, 89 patients with documented ragweed pollen allergy received fexofenadine b.i.d. with nedocromil rescue, fexofenadine q.d. with nedocromil b.i.d., or fexofenadine rescue with nedocromil b.i.d. during the ragweed pollen season.

RESULTS

For all regimens, mean symptom severity scores for itching, burning, tearing, redness, grittiness, discharge, light sensitivity and swelling improved significantly (P < 0.003). Similarly, all groups experienced significant (P < 0.02) improvement in all clinical signs: erythema, oedema, discharge, conjunctival injection and conjunctivitis, as well as quality-of-life scores (P < 0.0001). All regimens reduced overall symptom severity scores after 5 min (P < 0.05) with relief persisting over 12 h (P < 0.03). Improvements in mean symptoms, signs and quality-of-life scores were similar among the treatment groups as were onset and duration of action even though patients in two of the three study arms were taking one-half or less of the recommended fexofenadine dosage. Patients and physicians judged the regimens containing lower fexofenadine dosages (with nedocromil b.i.d.) to be more effective overall than the regimen containing the highest fexo-fenadine dosage (with nedocromil as rescue only).

CONCLUSIONS

Supplementation of oral fexofenadine therapy with nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution relieves ocular symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, allowing control of rhinal symptoms with half the recommended dosage of fexofenadine.

A combined analysis of two studies assessing the ocular comfort of antiallergy ophthalmic agents

BACKGROUND

Many topical agents with similar efficacies are available for the treatment of ocular allergies. In addition to efficacy, comfort is an important criterion because it affects overall patient satisfaction, compliance, and in turn efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to compare the comfort profiles of permirolast, ketorolac, cromolyn, and nedocromil ophthalmic solutions using combined results from 2 separate clinical trials.

METHODS

Two clinical trials were conducted. Adults with asymptomatic eyes were included in the first study. In this single-center, 7-day, prospective, double-blind, single-dose, crossover, parallel-group study, subjects were randomized to be bilaterally dosed with pemirolast, cromolyn, or ketorolac at each of 3 visits. Study 2 was a single-center, 1-day, prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, contralateral, active-control study in which subjects received pemirolast in 1 eye and nedocromil in the contralateral eye. In both studies, subjects completed a pre- and postinstillation ocular comfort questionnaire: the primary variable was overall ocular discomfort, measured on a 4-point scale original to these studies (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). Half-increments were permitted. Secondary variables included burning/stinging, foreign-body sensation, tearing, and photophobia.

RESULTS

Forty-five subjects (29 women, 16 men; mean [SD] age, 35.9 [12.6] years) were enrolled in study 1; 48 subjects (30 women, 18 men; mean [SD] age, 33.6 [10.2] years) were enrolled in study 2. In study 1, overall discomfort was significantly lower with pemirolast than with cromolyn (P = 0.001) or ketorolac (P < 0.001). In terms of overall discomfort, the number of subjects with a clinically significant increase (>/=1 unit) in score was significantly lower with pemirolast compared with ketorolac (P = 0.021). Burning/stinging and tearing were also significantly lower with pemirolast than with cromolyn (P < 0.001 and P = 0.014, respectively). Mean changes in score compared with preinstillation were consistently lower with pemirolast than with cromolyn for both burning/stinging (P < 0.001) and tearing (P = 0.014). In study 2, overall discomfort was significantly lower with pemirolast than with nedocromil (P < 0.001). The number of subjects with a clinically significant increase in overall discomfort score was significantly lower with pemirolast than with nedocromil (P = 0.007). No changes in ocular tolerability parameters were reported in either study.

CONCLUSION

In these single-dose studies, pemirolast was found to be significantly more comfortable than cromolyn, ketorolac, or nedocromil.

Two mast cell stabilizers, pemirolast potassium 0.1% and nedocromil sodium 2%, in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a comparative study

This randomized, double-masked, active-control, parallel-group trial compared the mast cell stabilizers pemirolast potassium 0.1% and nedocromil sodium 2% in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Pemirolast is currently indicated for four-times-daily administration, nedocromil, for twice-daily dosing. Both ophthalmic solutions were instilled bilaterally twice a day for 8 weeks. The study involved four office visits and two telephone contacts. Participants evaluated their symptoms daily in take-home diaries (itching was the primary efficacy variable) and completed questionnaires to assess comfort. Of a total enrollment of 80, 78 patients completed the study. No significant differences were found between pemirolast and nedocromil on any signs or symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis (redness, chemosis, itching, eyelid swelling). At each visit, pemirolast was rated significantly more comfortable than nedocromil. A significantly higher percentage of the pemirolast group experienced no signs or symptoms at work or school (58% vs 28%; P = .005). The number of adverse events did not differ significantly between groups. Twice-daily administration of pemirolast potassium was as efficacious and safe as twice-daily nedocromil sodium in the 8-week treatment of ragweed allergic conjunctivitis and was superior to nedocromil in comfort. Increased comfort with pemirolast may increase patient satisfaction and compliance with therapy.

Conjunctival provocation testing: overview of recent clinical trials in ocular allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The conjunctival provocation test is a human model of ocular allergy that has been used to study the ocular response to allergenic stimuli and to evaluate antiallergic therapy. The review will discuss recent studies using the conjunctival provocation test and other models of ocular allergy, and evaluate the relative merits of different models.

RECENT FINDINGS

The conjunctival provocation test has allowed investigators to recruit large numbers of allergic individuals who, although asymptomatic, can be challenged with the conjunctival administration of allergen. Observations of the eye can be made before and after challenge, and cells and mediators may be sampled from the ocular surface. In addition, the effectiveness of antiallergic therapy can be evaluated, usually by pretreating the two eyes with different forms or doses of drug.

SUMMARY

Considerable useful information has been gained about the ocular allergic response and drug efficacy using the conjunctival provocation test and naturally occurring seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

Twice-daily and once-daily nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution for the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis

In this 8-week open-label, prospective study, 30 patients with grass pollen allergy and ocular itching instilled nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution twice daily for a 5-day baseline period, followed by once-daily dosing thereafter. Physicians assessed clinical signs after the twice-daily period and after weeks 1 and 3 of the once-daily period; patients rated ocular symptoms daily. Use of specified rescue medication was permitted. Symptom scores for ocular itching, stinging, redness, swelling, burning, tearing, and light sensitivity did not differ significantly between the dosage periods. Scores for erythema, edema, conjunctival injection, and the entire conjunctiva decreased slightly during once-daily administration; discharge scores were unchanged. Of the 20 patients who used rescue medication, only 5 increased their usage by more than two doses per week during the once-daily period. Eighty-three percent of patients were willing to continue the once-daily regimen during the next allergy season. Physicians rated overall control of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis with once-daily administration as "good" or "moderate" in 100% of the patients; 93% of patients applied those ratings themselves. Nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution instilled once daily maintains control of symptoms in patients who are established on a twice-daily regimen.

Efficacy and acceptability of nedocromil sodium 2% and olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% in perennial allergic conjunctivitis

In this 2-week, randomized, crossover study, ophthalmic solutions of nedocromil sodium 2% and olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% were compared for effectiveness and acceptability in 28 patients with perennial allergic conjunctivitis and previous olopatadine experience. Patients received nedocromil twice daily or olopatadine twice daily for 1 week, then were crossed over to the alternate medication for 1 week. Outcome measures were patient satisfaction (questionnaire), severity of ocular symptoms (daily diary scores), clinical signs (physician assessments), quality of life (questionnaire), and global assessments of effectiveness. Both medications were well accepted. Of the 28 patients, 16 (57.1%) would request a nedocromil prescription, 10 (35.7%) an olopatadine prescription (P = .157); 22 patients (78.6%) would recommend nedocromil to other allergy sufferers, while 18 (64.3%) would recommend olopatadine (P = .480). Light sensitivity scores were significantly lower with nedocromil (P = .0125); other symptom scores were comparable between medications. Both drugs significantly (P < .01) and comparably decreased erythema, conjunctival injection, and overall conjunctival signs from baseline. Comparable improvement also occurred in quality-of-life scores. Both physicians and patients judged nedocromil and olopatadine to be similarly effective in preventing signs and symptoms. Nedocromil sodium 2% is an effective treatment for perennial allergic conjunctivitis. Patients receiving olopatadine can be switched to nedocromil with no loss in efficacy or satisfaction, but with a reduction in cost.

Nedocromil sodium in two models of conjunctival immediate hypersensitivity

The effects of intravenous administration of nedocromil sodium were investigated in active and passive models of conjunctival immediate hypersensitivity in rats. In the active sensitization model, animals were immunized with ovalbumin 21 days prior to ocular instillation of a solution containing ovalbumin. Nedocromil sodium administered prior to antigen challenge significantly inhibited emergence of conjunctival edema and erythema (P < .05) and reduced mast cell degranulation (P < .02). In the passive-sensitization model, the conjunctiva in one eye was injected with ovalbumin antiserum 48 hours prior to intravenous administration of ovalbumin. Nedocromil sodium administered prior to antigen challenge significantly and dose-dependently reduced appearance of the signs of conjunctivitis (P < .01) as well as vascular leakage (P < .05). These data indicate that intravenous nedocromil sodium is effective in animal models of allergic conjunctivitis and may have potential for wider therapeutic application. These data are also consistent with results of clinical studies in which nedocromil sodium relieved symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis and further support a role for nedocromil sodium in the prevention of allergic conjunctivitis.

Nedocromil sodium eye drops are more effective than sodium cromoglycate eye drops for the long-term management of vernal keratoconjunctivitis

BACKGROUND

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a severe though transient form of ocular allergy, predominant in young males, which requires careful management. Corticosteroids are effective but also cause serious topical side-effects in the eye, such as glaucoma and cataracts. The safer, mast cell stabilizing anti-inflammatories (commonly sodium cromoglycate) therefore have an important role. This parallel group study compared efficacy, tolerability and safety of sodium cromoglycate 2% with nedocromil sodium 2%, administered as one drop per eye four times daily for a period of 5 months.

METHODS

Children aged 4-17 years, with a diagnosis of mostly limbal VKC in the last 12 months, entered a 2-week baseline during which they used only artificial tears, and were then randomized to treatment, in groups of 18, on an investigator single-masked basis. Daily symptom diary cards were kept by patients/guardians, and VKC was assessed by the clinician at approximately monthly intervals. Dexamethasone was provided for rescue control of severe symptoms, if needed.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients completed the study. Both trial treatments produced rapid improvements and many ocular signs and symptoms, including Trantas' dots, chemosis, itching, soreness and sticky discharge, were fully controlled by the end of the study. However, nedocromil sodium took effect more quickly, with a significant reduction compared to sodium cromoglycate for itching, grittiness, hyperaemia and keratitis within 6 weeks. In addition, nedocromil sodium was the more efficacious overall (significant vs sodium cromoglycate for hyperaemia, keratitis, papillae and pannus at 22 weeks). Both treatments were well tolerated and without serious adverse effects. Final opinions favoured nedocromil sodium, with full control of VKC recorded for 94% (patient opinion) and 100% (clinician opinion) of this treatment group, compared with 29% and 0%, respectively, in the sodium cromoglycate group.

CONCLUSIONS

Nedocromil sodium 2% eye drops is significantly more effective than sodium cromoglycate for treatment of VKC.

Treating severe eye allergy

Allergic eye conditions, particularly seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC), are common. Itching, oedema and hyperaemia are relieved with topical H1-antagonists or sodium cromoglycate. The newer mast-cell stabilizing agent nedocromil sodium has a similar safety profile to sodium cromoglycate, but is more potent and has a more convenient twice-daily dosing regimen. When several placebo-controlled studies of its use in the treatment of SAC were analysed, it was found that 80% of patients reported symptom relief. In a further study, nedocromil sodium eyedrops (twice-daily dosing) had similar overall efficacy to sodium cromoglycate eyedrops (four-times-daily dosing) in subjects with SAC during the birch season, but during the period of highest pollen challenge, only the former agent was significantly more effective than placebo. Another study found that nedocromil sodium had efficacy equivalent to levocabastine over 7 days, but tended to have a more rapid onset of action. In patients with perennial allergic conjunctivitis (PAC) unresponsive to sodium cromoglycate, both clinicians and patients reported significantly better control of symptoms with nedocromil sodium eyedrops than with placebo. Recently, in a long-term study of treatment for vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC), it was found that nedocromil sodium 2% eyedrops produced a more rapid and marked improvement in symptoms than sodium cromoglycate 2% eyedrops and enabled lower use of steroid rescue medication. Both drugs were well tolerated and without serious side-effects.

A clinical overview of Tilarin

Tilarin is a nasal spray containing 1% nedocromil sodium, a non-toxic pyranoquinoline dicarboxylate compound with potent antiallergic antiinflammatory properties. As a first-line topical treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) the pharmacokinetics of nedocromil sodium nasal formulation are such that it rivals sodium cromoglycate for safety. Less than 8% of the total dose of nedocromil sodium is systemically absorbed from the nasal mucosa, and this is reversibly bound to plasma proteins and is cleared rapidly from the circulation. Nedocromil sodium is eliminated unmetabolised in the urine and faeces, with an elimination half-life of 5.3 +/- 0.9 minutes. No significant adverse effects have been reported following intranasal administration of 1% nedocromil sodium four times daily, to a total of 964 patients with allergic rhinitis during clinical trials. Laboratory studies have shown that nedocromil sodium has a more wide-ranging pharmacological antiinflammatory profile than sodium cromoglycate and this is manifest in its clinical efficacy in allergic asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis. Analysis of pooled data from a series of double-blind, placebo-controlled group comparative studies in SAR patients demonstrated that, despite a significantly lower use of rescue antihistamines than with placebo treatment (31% reduction; p = 0.005), four times daily dosage with nedocromil sodium 1% nasal spray significantly reduced daily symptoms of rhinitis (p < 0.001) and was considered effective by the majority of patients (p < 0.001). Specific examples of the therapeutic efficacy of nedocromil sodium compared with placebo in patients with grass or ragweed pollen SAR can be found in the literature. One ragweed study (1) included four times daily sodium cromoglycate 4% nasal spray as an active comparator and showed a consistent, if non-significant, trend in favour of nedocromil sodium 1%, which was the more effective drug in comparison to placebo. An Italian paediatric study (2) compared nedocromil sodium 1% nasal spray with placebo in 149 children of whom 72% were under twelve years of age. After one week, the clinicians observed a significant reduction (p = 0.03) in sneezing with nedocromil sodium and after four weeks, patient (p < 0.01) and clinican (p < 0.001) opinions favoured the active treatment. Overall, the clinical profile of topical nedocromil sodium in SAR demonstrates fast relief of existing symptoms, sustained efficacy with four times daily use during peak pollen challenge, and a reduced need for concomitant symptomatic therapies. Nedocromil sodium 1% nasal spray is well tolerated, with minimal side-effects, and is acceptable to a wide age-range of patients.