1
|
Satapathy SK, Elwir S, Brandman D, Smith C, Jiang Y, Vanatta J, Ha NB, Cheung AC, Bhat M, Patel P, Siddiqui MS, Rinella ME, Watt KD. Risk Stratification for Chronic Kidney Disease After Liver Transplant for Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatohepatitis (MASH) Cirrhosis: Results From the NailMASH Consortium. Transplantation 2025; 109:484-495. [PMID: 39434206 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a well-recognized complication in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT), particularly those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), a leading cause of cirrhosis in the modern era. This study sought to refine risk stratification for CKD events post-LT in cirrhosis patients with MASH by leveraging baseline renal function at transplant. METHODS A total of 717 MASH cirrhosis patients who had LT (1997-2017) at 7 US centers (NailMASH Consortium) were analyzed. Patients were categorized by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at transplant: low (LGFR, eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m²), medium (MGFR, eGFR >30-≤60 mL/min/1.73 m²), and high (HGFR, eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m²). Time-related eGFR intercepts, slopes, and assessments of advanced-stage CKD (aCKD) events, defined as 2 eGFR levels <30 mL/min/1.73 m² separated by ≥90 d, were examined. RESULTS Post-LT, LGFR group showed increased eGFR, whereas the HGFR group experienced a decline. The 3-mo mark was identified as a "reset point," signifying a new reference level, beyond which a different rate of decline was observed. After 3 mo, mean eGFRs of the LGFR group approached MGFRs, whereas the mean eGFR of the HGFR group continued to decrease but remained higher than other groups during a 60-mo follow-up. LGFR patients had significantly higher aCKD probability than MGFR and HGFR groups. Subanalysis at 3 mo post-LT revealed more aCKD events in the LGFR group compared with MGFR and HGFR groups ( P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The study underscores renal impact of LT in MASH cirrhosis, indicating unique eGFR trajectories post-LT tied to baseline eGFR, with a reset point at 3 mo. Monitoring post-LT renal function, especially in those at aCKD risk, is crucial. Renal-sparing immunosuppression may help, regardless of baseline eGFR. Further studies are needed for interventions addressing renal dysfunction of patients with MASH post-LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjaya K Satapathy
- Northwell Health Center for Liver Diseases and Transplantation, Northshore University Hospital/Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY
| | - Saleh Elwir
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Danielle Brandman
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Coleman Smith
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, DC
| | - Yu Jiang
- University of Tennessee/Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Jason Vanatta
- University of Tennessee/Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Nghiem B Ha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Amanda C Cheung
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Pratik Patel
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Mary E Rinella
- Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Hooff MC, de Veer RC, Karam V, Adam R, Taimr P, Polak WG, Pashtoun H, Murad SD, Corpechot C, Mirza D, Heneghan M, Lodge P, Oniscu GC, Thorburn D, Allison M, Metselaar HJ, den Hoed CM, van der Meer AJ. Type of calcineurin inhibitor and long-term outcomes following liver transplantation in patients with primary biliary cholangitis - an ELTR study. JHEP Rep 2024; 6:101100. [PMID: 39045337 PMCID: PMC11263784 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Tacrolimus has been associated with recurrence of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) after liver transplantation (LT), which in turn may reduce survival. This study aimed to assess the association between the type of calcineurin inhibitor used and long-term outcomes following LT in patients with PBC. METHODS Survival analyses were used to assess the association between immunosuppressive drugs and graft or patient survival among adult patients with PBC in the European Liver Transplant Registry. Patients who received a donation after brain death graft between 1990 and 2021 with at least 1 year of event-free follow-up were included. RESULTS In total, 3,175 patients with PBC were followed for a median duration of 11.4 years (IQR 5.9-17.9) after LT. Tacrolimus (Tac) was registered in 2,056 (64.8%) and cyclosporin in 819 (25.8%) patients. Following adjustment for recipient age, recipient sex, donor age, and year of LT, Tac was not associated with higher risk of graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.07, 95% CI 0.92-1.25, p = 0.402) or death (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 0.90-1.24, p = 0.473) over cyclosporin. In this model, maintenance mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was associated with a lower risk of graft loss (aHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.87, p <0.001) or death (aHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.87, p <0.001), while these risks were higher with use of steroids (aHR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13-1.52, p <0.001, and aHR 1.34, 95% CI 1.15-1.56, p <0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In this large LT registry, type of calcineurin inhibitor was not associated with long-term graft or recipient survival, providing reassurance regarding the use of Tac post LT in the population with PBC. Patients using MMF had a lower risk of graft loss and death, indicating that the threshold for combination treatment with Tac and MMF should be low. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS This study investigated the association between immunosuppressive drugs and the long-term survival of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) following donation after brain death liver transplantation. While tacrolimus has previously been related to a higher risk of PBC recurrence, the type of calcineurin inhibitor was not related to graft or patient survival among patients transplanted for PBC in the European Liver Transplant Registry. Additionally, maintenance use of mycophenolate was linked to lower risks of graft loss and death, while these risks were higher with maintenance use of steroids. Our findings should provide reassurance for physicians regarding the continued use of Tac after liver transplantation in the population with PBC, and suggest potential benefit from combination therapy with mycophenolate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C. van Hooff
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rozanne C. de Veer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent Karam
- European Society for Organ Transplantation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rene Adam
- European Liver Transplant Registry, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris-Saclay Villejuif, France
| | - Pavel Taimr
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Wojciech G. Polak
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hasina Pashtoun
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarwa Darwish Murad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christophe Corpechot
- Reference Center for Inflammatory Biliary Diseases and Autoimmune Hepatitis, European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN Rare-Liver), Saint-Antoine Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris; Inserm UMR_S938, Saint-Antoine Research Center, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Darius Mirza
- Department of HPB Surgery, Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Heneghan
- Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Lodge
- The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Gabriel C. Oniscu
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburg, United Kingdom
- Division of Transplantation, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Douglas Thorburn
- Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Allison
- Liver Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Herold J. Metselaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline M. den Hoed
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan J. van der Meer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim DS, Yoon YI, Kim BK, Choudhury A, Kulkarni A, Park JY, Kim J, Sinn DH, Joo DJ, Choi Y, Lee JH, Choi HJ, Yoon KT, Yim SY, Park CS, Kim DG, Lee HW, Choi WM, Chon YE, Kang WH, Rhu J, Lee JG, Cho Y, Sung PS, Lee HA, Kim JH, Bae SH, Yang JM, Suh KS, Al Mahtab M, Tan SS, Abbas Z, Shresta A, Alam S, Arora A, Kumar A, Rathi P, Bhavani R, Panackel C, Lee KC, Li J, Yu ML, George J, Tanwandee T, Hsieh SY, Yong CC, Rela M, Lin HC, Omata M, Sarin SK. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation. Hepatol Int 2024; 18:299-383. [PMID: 38416312 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-023-10629-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Sik Kim
- Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-In Yoon
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Beom Kyung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Jun Yong Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jongman Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Hyun Sinn
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Jin Joo
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Hoon Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Joong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Tae Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Young Yim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheon-Soo Park
- Department of Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Deok-Gie Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Won-Mook Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Eun Chon
- Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo-Hyoung Kang
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsoo Rhu
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Geun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yuri Cho
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Ilsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Pil Soo Sung
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Han Ah Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hoon Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Si Hyun Bae
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Mo Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Mamun Al Mahtab
- Department of Hepatology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Soek Siam Tan
- Department of Medicine, Hospital Selayang, Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Zaigham Abbas
- Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Ananta Shresta
- Department of Hepatology, Alka Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Shahinul Alam
- Crescent Gastroliver and General Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Anil Arora
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital New Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashish Kumar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital New Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Pravin Rathi
- TN Medical College and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Ruveena Bhavani
- University of Malaya Medical Centre, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | | | - Kuei Chuan Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jun Li
- College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ming-Lung Yu
- Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | - H C Lin
- Endoscopy Center for Diagnosis and Treatment, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Masao Omata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan
- University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Agostini C, Buccianti S, Risaliti M, Fortuna L, Tirloni L, Tucci R, Bartolini I, Grazi GL. Complications in Post-Liver Transplant Patients. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6173. [PMID: 37834818 PMCID: PMC10573382 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for liver failure and selected cases of malignancies. Transplantation activity has increased over the years, and indications for LT have been widened, leading to organ shortage. To face this condition, a high selection of recipients with prioritizing systems and an enlargement of the donor pool were necessary. Several authors published their case series reporting the results obtained with the use of marginal donors, which seem to have progressively improved over the years. The introduction of in situ and ex situ machine perfusion, although still strongly debated, and better knowledge and treatment of the complications may have a role in achieving better results. With longer survival rates, a significant number of patients will suffer from long-term complications. An extensive review of the literature concerning short- and long-term outcomes is reported trying to highlight the most recent findings. The heterogeneity of the behaviors within the different centers is evident, leading to a difficult comparison of the results and making explicit the need to obtain more consent from experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ilenia Bartolini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, AOU Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy; (C.A.); (S.B.); (M.R.); (L.F.); (L.T.); (R.T.); (G.L.G.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Renal disease in the allograft recipient. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 46-47:101690. [PMID: 33158468 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Chronic renal failure after liver transplantation (LT) is significantly more frequent than after lung or heart transplantation and it results in an increased short and long-term mortality. Renal impairment may occur before LT (functional or due to preexisting parenchymal kidney disease), in the peri-operative period or later after LT. The number of patients with renal failure after LT has increased due to the liver allocation based on MELD and to the more liberal use of higher risk grafts. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is the most important cause of renal dysfunction but is a modifiable factor. Strategy to prevent CNI-associated nephrotoxicity is post-op CNI minimization by induction therapy and reduced dose and/or delayed introduction of CNI in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or everolimus with no penalty in term of rejection. With everolimus, usually started one month after LT, a drastic minimization of CNI is possible and this results in superior kidney function until at least 3 years follow up. At the moment of renal impairment a drastic reduction of CNI dose together with the introduction of MMF results in an improvement in GFR at 6 to 2 years with a low rate of acute rejection. However, secondary prevention fails to normalize renal function in most of the patients once e GFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2ml.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lin SD, Lee Krishnamoorthy T, Kumar R, Lim RT. Tacrolimus Monotherapy in Recipients of Liver Transplant: A Single-Center Experience. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:1920-1922. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Revised: 04/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
7
|
|
8
|
Beckebaum S, Cicinnati VR, Radtke A, Kabar I. Calcineurin inhibitors in liver transplantation - still champions or threatened by serious competitors? Liver Int 2013; 33:656-65. [PMID: 23442173 DOI: 10.1111/liv.12133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2012] [Accepted: 01/29/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Current strategies for immunosuppression in liver transplant (LT) recipients include the design of protocols targeting a more individualized approach to reduce risk factors such as renal failure, cardiovascular complications and malignancies. Renal injury in LT recipients may be often multifactorial and is associated with increased risk of post-transplant morbidity and mortality. The quest for low toxicity immunosuppressive regimens has been challenging and resulted in CNI minimization protocols or CNI withdrawal and conversion to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and/or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimens. Use of antibody induction to delay CNI administration may be an option in particular in immunocompromized, critically ill patients with high MELD scores. Protocols including MMF introduction and concomitant CNI minimization have the potential to recover renal function even in the medium and long term after LT. We review on hot topics in the prevention and management of acute and chronic renal injury in LT patients. For this purpose, we present and critically discuss results from immunosuppressive studies published in the current literature or presented at recent LT meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Beckebaum
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Saner FH, Cicinnati VR, Sotiropoulos G, Beckebaum S. Strategies to prevent or reduce acute and chronic kidney injury in liver transplantation. Liver Int 2012; 32:179-88. [PMID: 21745304 DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02563.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) has a major impact on short- and long-term survival in liver transplant (LT) patients. There is no currently accepted uniform definition of AKI, which would facilitate standardization of the care of patients with AKI and to improve and enhance collaborative research efforts. New promising biomarkers such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin or kidney injury molecule-1 have been developed for the prevention of delayed AKI treatment. Early dialysis has been shown to be beneficial in patients with AKI stage III according to the classification of the Acute Kidney Injury Network, whereas treatment with loop diuretics or dopamine is associated with worse outcome. The mainstay for the prevention of AKI seems to be avoidance of volume depletion and maintenance of a mean arterial pressure >65 mmHg. Although the aetiology of chronic kidney disease in transplant recipients may be multifactorial, calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-induced nephrotoxicity significantly contributes to the development of renal dysfunction over time after LT. The delayed introduction of CNI at minimal doses has shown to be safe and effective for the preservation of kidney function. Other strategies to overcome CNI nephrotoxicity include CNI minimization protocols or CNI withdrawal and conversion to mycophenolate mofetil or the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimens. However, CNI avoidance may bear a higher rejection risk. Thus, more results from randomized-controlled studies are urgently warranted to determine which drug combinations are the most beneficial approaches for the potential introduction of CNI-free immunosuppressive regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuat H Saner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Durand F. Hot-topic debate on kidney function: renal-sparing approaches are beneficial. Liver Transpl 2011; 17 Suppl 3:S43-9. [PMID: 21796759 DOI: 10.1002/lt.22392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
1. Renal function is frequently compromised in candidates for transplantation with advanced cirrhosis. These patients frequently have chronic and irreversible kidney changes at the time of transplantation. 2. The accumulated incidence of chronic renal failure is high in liver transplant recipients. Chronic renal failure has a deleterious impact on the outcome. 3. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression is highly effective at preventing rejection. However, CNI nephrotoxicity has a central role in the occurrence of chronic renal failure. 4. Renal function impairment frequently occurs within the first year after transplantation. Once renal function is significantly impaired [glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) ], any intervention is unlikely to result in a return to normal renal function. Early interventions are needed to prevent chronic and irreversible kidney injury. 5. De novo CNI minimization has been proven to be effective at reducing the rate of impaired renal function after transplantation. The reduction in the CNI doses should be offset by the addition of mycophenolate mofetil or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium. 6. Delayed CNI minimization in patients with established renal insufficiency may result in a significant improvement in the GFR, even though the increase in the GFR after minimization is generally modest. 7. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are considered nonnephrotoxic immunosuppressive agents. They may be an option for improving renal function in liver transplant recipients. However, not all patients with renal dysfunction benefit from a switch to mTOR inhibitors. In addition, the benefits in terms of renal function should be balanced against specific side effects. 8. New immunosuppressive agents without intrinsic nephrotoxicity are currently under development for solid organ transplantation. These agents could help to reduce the burden of impaired renal function in transplantation in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Durand
- Department of Hepatology and Liver Intensive Care, Beaujon Hospital, and Bichat-Beaujon Center of Biomedical Research (National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 773), University of Paris VII, Clichy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kong Y, Wang D, Shang Y, Liang W, Ling X, Guo Z, He X. Calcineurin-inhibitor minimization in liver transplant patients with calcineurin-inhibitor-related renal dysfunction: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2011; 6:e24387. [PMID: 21931704 PMCID: PMC3170329 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2011] [Accepted: 08/08/2011] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Introduction of calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) has made transplantation a miracle in the past century. However, the side effects of long-term use of CNI turn out to be one of the major challenges in the current century. Among these, renal dysfunction attracts more and more attention. Herein, we undertook a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) minimization protocols in liver transplant recipients with CNI-related renal dysfunction. Methods We included randomized trials with no year and language restriction. All data were analyzed using random effect model by Review Manager 5.0. The primary endpoints were glomerular filtration rate (GFR), serum creatinine level (sCr) and creatinine clearance rate (CrCl), and the secondary endpoints were acute rejection episodes, incidence of infection and patient survival at the end of follow-up. Results GFR was significantly improved in CNI minimization group than in routine CNI regimen group (Z = 5.45, P<0.00001; I2 = 0%). Likely, sCr level was significantly lower in the CNI minimization group (Z = 2.84, P = 0.005; I2 = 39%). However, CrCl was not significantly higher in the CNI minimization group (Z = 1.59, P = 0.11; I2 = 0%). Both acute rejection episodes and patient survival were comparable between two groups (rejection: Z = 0.01, P = 0.99; I2 = 0%; survival: Z = 0.28, P = 0.78; I2 = 0%, respectively). However, current CNI minimization protocols may be related to a higher incidence of infections (Z = 3.06, P = 0.002; I2 = 0%). Conclusion CNI minimization can preserve or even improve renal function in liver transplant patients with renal impairment, while sharing similar short term acute rejection rate and patient survival with routine CNI regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Kong
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dongping Wang
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yushu Shang
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenhua Liang
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoting Ling
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiyong Guo
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- * E-mail: (ZG); (XH)
| | - Xiaoshun He
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- * E-mail: (ZG); (XH)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Leithead JA, Ferguson JW, Bates CM, Davidson JS, Simpson KJ, Hayes PC. Chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation for acute liver failure is not associated with perioperative renal dysfunction. Am J Transplant 2011; 11:1905-15. [PMID: 21827620 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03649.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Renal dysfunction of acute liver failure (ALF) may have distinct pathophysiological mechanisms to hepatorenal syndrome of cirrhosis. Yet, the impact of perioperative renal function on posttransplant renal outcomes in ALF patients specifically has not been established. The aims of this study were (1) to describe the incidence and risk factors for chronic renal dysfunction following liver transplantation for ALF and (2) to compare renal outcomes with age-sex-matched patients transplanted for chronic liver disease. This was a single-center study of 101 patients transplanted for ALF. Fifty-three-and-a-half percent had pretransplant acute kidney injury and 64.9% required perioperative renal replacement therapy. After transplantation the 5-year cumulative incidence of chronic kidney disease (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²) was 41.5%. There was no association between perioperative acute kidney injury (p = 0.288) or renal replacement therapy (p = 0.134) and chronic kidney disease. Instead, the independent predictors of chronic kidney disease were older age (p = 0.019), female gender (p = 0.049), hypertension (p = 0.031), cyclosporine (p = 0.027) and nonacetaminophen-induced ALF (p = 0.039). Despite marked differences in the perioperative clinical condition and survival of patients transplanted for ALF and chronic liver disease, renal outcomes were the same. In conclusion, in patients transplanted for ALF the severity of perioperative renal injury does not predict posttransplant chronic renal dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Leithead
- Scottish Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Duvoux C, Pageaux GP. Immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients with renal impairment. J Hepatol 2011; 54:1041-54. [PMID: 21145927 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2009] [Revised: 11/27/2010] [Accepted: 12/01/2010] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- C Duvoux
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Henri Mondor AP-HP, University Paris Est, Créteil, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cantarovich M, Brown NW, Ensom MHH, Jain A, Kuypers DRJ, Van Gelder T, Tredger JM. Mycophenolate monitoring in liver, thoracic, pancreas, and small bowel transplantation: a consensus report. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2011; 25:65-77. [PMID: 21454066 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2010.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2010] [Accepted: 12/07/2010] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Assessing the value of mycophenolic acid (MPA) monitoring outside renal transplantation is hindered by the absence of any trial comparing fixed-dose and concentration-controlled therapy. However, in liver and thoracic transplantation particularly, clinical trials, observational studies with comparison groups, and case series have described MPA efficacy, exposure/efficacy relationships, pharmacokinetic variability, and clinical outcomes relating to plasma MPA concentrations. On the basis of this evidence, this report identifies MPA as an immunosuppressant for which the combination of variable disposition, efficacy, and adverse effects contributes to interindividual differences seemingly in excess of those optimal for a fixed-dosage mycophenolate regimen. Combined with experiences of MPA monitoring in other transplant indications, the data have been rationalized to define circumstances in which measurement of MPA concentrations can contribute to improved management of mycophenolate therapy in nonrenal transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Cantarovich
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, McGill University Health Center, 687 Pine Avenue West (R2.58), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kornberg A, Küpper B, Thrum K, Krause B, Büchler P, Kornberg J, Sappler A, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Wilberg J, Friess H. Sustained renal response to mycophenolate mofetil and CNI taper promotes survival in liver transplant patients with CNI-related renal dysfunction. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56:244-51. [PMID: 20824504 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-010-1386-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2010] [Accepted: 08/04/2010] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this trial was to evaluate the impact of conversion from a calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppressive regimen to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and reduced-dose CNI on long-term renal function and survival in a series of 63 liver transplant patients with CNI-induced renal dysfunction. METHODS CNI dosage was significantly tapered after introduction of 2,000 mg MMF per day. Renal function was assessed by determination of serum creatinine levels and calculated creatinine clearance (CCl). The impact of relevant clinical parameters on renal function and survival post-conversion was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS At 60 months post-conversion, mean creatinine level had significantly declined from 197.2±58.3 μmol/l at baseline to 160.0±76.5 μmol/l, and mean CCl has significantly increased from 38.4±13.4 ml/min at baseline to 47.9±21.1 ml/min (p<0.001), respectively. Forty-six patients (73.1%) demonstrated sustained renal response to modified immunosuppression. Full-dose MMF medication (p=0.006) and the early conversion (p=0.02) were identified as independent predictors of persistent renal function improvement. Sustained renal response to MMF plus reduced-dose CNI was identified as the most relevant independent promoter of long-term survival (hazard ratio 6.9). Five-year survival rate post-conversion was 93.9% in renal responders and 64.3% in renal non-responders (log rank<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Sustained renal response to MMF and CNI dose reduction promotes long-term survival in liver transplant patients with CNI-induced renal dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kornberg
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, TU Munich, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Conversion to combined mycophenolate mofetil and low-dose calcineurin inhibitor therapy for renal dysfunction in liver transplant patients: never too late? Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56:4-6. [PMID: 21049289 PMCID: PMC3010221 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-010-1449-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
17
|
Barrera-Pulido L, Espinosa-Aguilar MD, Marín D, Nuñez-Garcia F, Jiménez-Pérez M, de la Mata-Garcia M, Gómez-Bravo MA. Influence of mycophenolate mofetil on preservation of kidney function in liver transplant patients. Transplant Proc 2010; 42:651-655. [PMID: 20304215 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are numerous studies on the effect of immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on preservation of kidney function in liver transplant (OLT) patients with chronic kidney damage. However, we have noted few studies that evaluate the role of this drug prescribed from induction on kidney function. PATIENTS AND METHODS This prospective observational multicenter study included 296 OLT performed from 2005 to 2007. The collected variables were; gender, and age, Child-Pugh stage, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, transplant indication, induction immunosuppressive therapy, and baseline and 1 year posttransplant values of creatinine and glomerular filtration rate. Patients were classified into 4 groups: group 1 received MMF from induction; group 2 was never treated with MMF; group 3 started MMF in the first month posttransplant, and group 4 started MMF therapy in the third month posttransplant. We used Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U statistical tests. RESULTS There was a difference of 0.18 mg/dL in baseline creatinine values between groups 1 and 2 (P < .01). However, although patients who consistently had MMF in their treatment started with worse creatinine values, they were able to maintain them within normal ranges at 12 months. In contrast, patients in group 2 showed a significant worsening of 0.28 mg/dL in the first month that persisted throughout the study. Group 3 displayed worse baseline creatinine values than group 2 (P < .05), and also suffered an increase of 0.29 mg/dL (P < .01) versus baseline at 1 month. When MMF was added to their immunosuppressive therapy, the creatinine values reduced versus 1 month by 0.18 mg/dL (P < .05). Creatinine values remained stable at the other study assessments. Group 4 showed a normal creatinine value at baseline, but were altered at 1 and 3 months (P < .01), with increases versus baseline of 0.46 and 0.35 mg/dL, respectively. However, when MMF was introduced kidney function was restored and maintained over the study. CONCLUSION Early introduction of MMF improved creatinine values among patients with impaired kidney function, maintaining them at stable levels. Furthermore, patients with altered creatinine values at baseline did not worsen their kidney function if they receive MMF from induction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Barrera-Pulido
- Hepatobiliary-pancreatic Unit of Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|