Severity of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in solid organ transplant patients

Clostridioides difficile infection: history, epidemiology, risk factors, prevention, clinical manifestations, treatment, and future options

SUMMARYClostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the major issues in nosocomial infections. This bacterium is constantly evolving and poses complex challenges for clinicians, often encountered in real-life scenarios. In the face of CDI, we are increasingly equipped with new therapeutic strategies, such as monoclonal antibodies and live biotherapeutic products, which need to be thoroughly understood to fully harness their benefits. Moreover, interesting options are currently under study for the future, including bacteriophages, vaccines, and antibiotic inhibitors. Surveillance and prevention strategies continue to play a pivotal role in limiting the spread of the infection. In this review, we aim to provide the reader with a comprehensive overview of epidemiological aspects, predisposing factors, clinical manifestations, diagnostic tools, and current and future prophylactic and therapeutic options for C. difficile infection.

Class-Specific Relationship Between Use of Immunosuppressants and Risk for Community-Acquired Clostridioides difficile Infection

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressant exposure is associated with risk for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). It is unknown whether this risk is shared equally across immunosuppressant classes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. Adults were included if they were tested for community-acquired CDI (CA-CDI) by stool polymerase chain reaction within 72 hours of hospitalization between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcome was CA-CDI requiring hospitalization, defined as a positive stool test. The primary exposure was use of a home immunosuppressant, at any dose or duration, defined based on the medication reconciliation, and categorized as systemic steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, antimetabolites, anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents, anti-CD20 antibody, and all others.

RESULTS

A total of 10 992 hospitalized patients met criteria for the study including 1793 (16%) with CA-CDI; 23% used 1 or more immunosuppressant class. Among those immunosuppressed, 27% tested positive for CA-CDI compared with 22% among those who were not immunosuppressed (P < .01). After adjustment, calcineurin inhibitors (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.44) were associated with increased risk for CA-CDI. Risk for CA-CDI rose with multiple immunosuppressant classes: aOR, 1.22; aOR, 1.53; and aOR, 2.40 for 2, 3, and 4 classes, respectively. After excluding those with solid organ transplant, the relationship between use of calcineurin inhibitors and CDI increased (aOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.40-3.49).

CONCLUSIONS

The greatest risk for CA-CDI was observed among patients using multiple classes of immunosuppressants and those using calcineurin inhibitors. Future studies should recognize that CDI risk differs based on immunosuppressant class.

The outcomes of Clostridioides difficile infection in inpatient liver transplant population

BACKGROUND

Chronic immunosuppression is a known cause of Clostridioides difficile, which presents with colon infection. It is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Our aim is to determine the inpatient outcomes of liver transplant patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and trends in the last few years.

METHODS

We utilized the national re-admission data (2010-2017) to study the outcomes of CDI in liver transplant patients. Association of C. difficile with re-admission was computed in a multivariable model adjusted for age, sex, gastrointestinal bleeding, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, obesity, cancer, insurance, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, peripheral vascular disease, smoking, hospital location, and teaching status.

RESULTS

During 2010-2017, there were 310 222 liver transplant patients hospitalized. Out of these, 9826 had CDI. CDI infection in liver transplant patients was associated with higher 30-day re-admission (14.3% vs. 11.21%, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.28, p = .02) and in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.14-1.61, p < .001). The most common causes of re-admission in the CDI group were recurrent CDI (41.1%), liver transplant complications (16.5%), and sepsis (11.6%). The median cost for liver transplant patients with C. difficile was significantly higher, $53 064 (IQR $24 970-$134 830) compared to patients that did not have C. difficile, $35 703 ($18 793-$73 871) (p < .001). The median length of stay was also longer for patients with CDI, 6 days (4-14) vs. 4 days (2-7) (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

CDI in post-liver transplant patients was associated with higher mortality, re-admission, health care cost, and longer length of stay. The most common cause of re-admission was recurrent CDI, which raises the question of the efficacy of standard first-line therapy.

Early Clostridioides difficile infection characterizations, risks, and outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) frequently complicates allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (allo-HCT) and solid organ transplantation (SOT).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed risk factors and outcomes of CDI occurring within 30 days of transplant.

RESULTS

Between March 2010 and June 2015, 466 allo-HCT and 1454 SOT were performed. The CDI cumulative incidence (95% CI) was 10% (8-13) and 4% (3-5), following allo-HCT and SOT, respectively (p < .01), occurring at a median (range) 7.5 days (1-30) and 11 (1-30), respectively (p = .18). In multivariate analysis, fluoroquinolones use within 14 days pre-transplantation was a risk factor for CDI following allo-HCT (HR 4.06 [95% CI 1.31-12.63], p = .02), and thoracic organ(s) transplantation was a risk factor for CDI following SOT (HR 3.03 [95% CI 1.31-6.98]) for lung and 3.90 (1.58-9.63) for heart and heart/kidney transplant, p = .02. Compared with no-CDI patients, the length of stay (LOS) was prolonged in both allo-HCT (35 days [19-141] vs. 29 [13-164], p < .01) and SOT with CDI (16.5 [4-101] vs. 7 [0-159], p < .01), though not directly attributed to CDI. In allo-HCT, severe acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) occurred more frequently in patients with CDI (33.3% vs. 15.8% without CDI, p = .01) and most aGVHD (87.5%) followed CDI. Non-relapse mortality or overall survival, not attributed to CDI, were also similar in both allo-HCT and SOT.

CONCLUSIONS

Early post-transplant CDI is frequent, associated with fluoroquinolones use in allo-HCT and the transplanted organ in SOT, and is associated with longer LOS in both the groups without difference in survival but with increased aGVHD in allo-HCT.

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Redefining Surgical Management of Refractory Clostridium difficile Infection

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the process of transplanting stool from a healthy donor into the gut of a diseased individual for therapeutic purposes. It has a clearly defined role in the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile (reclassified as " Clostridioides difficile ") infection (CDI), with cure rates over 90% and decreased rates of subsequent recurrence compared with anti-CDI antibiotics. There is emerging evidence that FMT is also effective in the treatment of severe and fulminant CDI, with associated decreases in mortality and colectomy rates compared with standard antibiotic therapy. FMT shows promise as salvage therapy for critically-ill CDI patients refractory to maximum medical therapy and not deemed to be surgical candidates. FMT should be considered early in the course of severe CDI and should be delivered immediately in patients with signs of refractory CDI. Expansion of FMT's use along the spectrum of CDI severity has potential to decrease associated rates of mortality and colectomy.

Clostridioides difficile infection and recurrence among 2622 solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is common after solid organ transplant (SOT) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

We assessed incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of CDI among SOT patients at a large multi-organ transplant center. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for initial and recurrent CDI.

RESULTS

A total of 2622 SOT patients were included. 224 (8.5%) had CDI 1 year post-SOT. The highest incidence of CDI was among pancreas recipients (12.5%) followed by lung (11.7%), liver (11.0%), heart (10.8%), and kidney (5.8%). Median time to CDI was 56 days (range 2-354) post-SOT. About 64% of patients had severe CDI. About 56.3% were treated with metronidazole, 13.8% with oral vancomycin, and 28.6% with both. About 28.6% of patients had recurrent CDI. In multivariable modeling, lung transplant recipient status was the only significant predictor of recurrent CDI (OR 4.97, 95% CI 2.11-11.78, P < .001) controlling for age, severe CDI, and pre-SOT CDI. Post-SOT CDI nearly doubled the risk of mortality at one year, in particular among those with severe CDI.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, CDI is highly prevalent, occurs early in the post-transplant period, usually severe, with a high rate of recurrence, and associated with increased mortality within 1 year after transplant. The early post-transplant period may be a crucial window to reduce CDI rates.

Management of Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) in solid organ transplant recipients: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Community of Practice

These updated guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice address the prevention and management of Clostridium difficile infection in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) is among the most common hospital acquired infections. In SOT recipients, the incidence of CDI varies by type and number or organs transplanted. While a meta-analysis of published literature found the prevalence of postoperative CDI in the general surgical population to be approximately 0.51%, the prevalence of CDI that is seen in the solid organ transplant population ranges from a low of 3.2% in the pancreatic transplant population to 12.7% in those receiving multiple organ transplants. There are no randomized, controlled trials evaluating the management of CDI in the SOT population. Herein is a review and summary of the currently available literature that has been synthesized into updated treatment guidelines for the management of CDI in the SOT population.

Colon Surgery Risk With Corticosteroids Versus Immunomodulators or Biologics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients With Clostridium difficile Infection

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an independent risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), and CDI often precipitates IBD exacerbation. Because CDI cannot be distinguished clinically from an IBD exacerbation, management is difficult. We aimed to assess factors associated with adverse outcomes in IBD with CDI, including the role of escalating or de-escalating IBD therapy and CDI treatment.

METHODS

Records for patients with IBD and CDI from 2008 to 2013 were abstracted for variables including IBD severity before CDI diagnosis, CDI management, subsequent IBD exacerbation, CDI recurrence, and colon surgery. Colon surgery was defined as resection of any colonic segment within 1 year after CDI diagnosis.

RESULTS

We included 137 IBD patients (median age, 46 years; 55% women): 70 with ulcerative colitis (51%), 63 with Crohn's disease (46%), and 4 with indeterminate colitis (3%). Overall, 70% of CDIs were mild-moderate, 14% were severe, and 15% were severe-complicated. Clostridium difficile infection treatment choice did not vary by infection severity (P = 0.27). Corticosteroid escalation (odds ratio [OR], 5.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-17.44) was a positive predictor of colon surgery within 1 year after CDI; older age (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.44) was a negative predictor. Modifying the corticosteroid regimen did not affect CDI recurrence or risk of future IBD exacerbation. Adverse outcomes did not differ with CDI antibiotic regimens or biologic or immunomodulator regimen modification.

CONCLUSIONS

Corticosteroid escalation for IBD during CDI was associated with higher risk of colon surgery. Type of CDI treatment did not influence IBD outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to further elucidate optimal management in this high-risk population.

Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and severe Clostridium difficile infection in solid organ transplant recipients: A multicenter experience

Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is recommended for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treatment; however, use in solid organ transplantation (SOT) patients has theoretical safety concerns. This multicenter, retrospective study evaluated FMT safety, effectiveness, and risk factors for failure in SOT patients. Primary cure and overall cure were defined as resolution of diarrhea or negative C difficile stool test after a single FMT or after subsequent FMT(s) ± anti-CDI antibiotics, respectively. Ninety-four SOT patients underwent FMT, 78% for recurrent CDI and 22% for severe or fulminant CDI. FMT-related adverse events (AE) occurred in 22.3% of cases, mainly comprising self-limiting conditions including nausea, abdominal pain, and FMT-related diarrhea. Severe AEs occurred in 3.2% of cases, with no FMT-related bacteremia. After FMT, 25% of patients with underlying inflammatory bowel disease had worsening disease activity, while 14% of cytomegalovirus-seropositive patients had reactivation. At 3 months, primary cure was 58.7%, while overall cure was 91.3%. Predictors of failing a single FMT included inpatient status, severe and fulminant CDI, presence of pseudomembranous colitis, and use of non-CDI antibiotics at the time of FMT. These data suggest FMT is safe in SOT patients. However, repeated FMT(s) or additional antibiotics may be needed to optimize rates of cure with FMT.

Clostridium difficile infection is associated with graft loss in solid organ transplant recipients

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a leading cause of infectious diarrhea in solid organ transplant recipients (SOT). We aimed to assess incidence, risk factors, and outcome of CDI within the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS). We performed a case-control study of SOT recipients in the STCS diagnosed with CDI between May 2008 and August 2013. We matched 2 control subjects per case by age at transplantation, sex, and transplanted organ. A multivariable analysis was performed using conditional logistic regression to identify risk factors and evaluate outcome of CDI. Two thousand one hundred fifty-eight SOT recipients, comprising 87 cases of CDI and 174 matched controls were included. The overall CDI rate per 10 000 patient days was 0.47 (95% confidence interval ([CI] 0.38-0.58), with the highest rate in lung (1.48, 95% CI 0.93-2.24). In multivariable analysis, proven infections (hazard ratio [HR] 2.82, 95% CI 1.29-6.19) and antibiotic treatments (HR 4.51, 95% CI 2.03-10.0) during the preceding 3 months were independently associated with the development of CDI. Despite mild clinical presentations, recipients acquiring CDI posttransplantation had an increased risk of graft loss (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.15-4.37; P = .02). These findings may help to improve the management of SOT recipients.

The Impact of Clostridium difficile Infection on Future Outcomes of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVEClostridium difficile infection (CDI) is common in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, but few studies have examined long-term outcomes. We studied the impact of CDI after SOT on mortality and transplant organ complication-related hospitalizations (TOH).METHODSSOT recipients ≥18 years of age with at least 1 year of posttransplant data were analyzed using the MarketScan database for 2007-2014. Patients who died within one year of transplant were followed until death. Patients were grouped as early CDI (ie, first occurrence ≤90 days posttransplant), late CDI (ie, first occurrence >90 days posttransplant) and controls (ie, no CDI occurrence during follow-up). The risk of mortality or TOH after CDI was evaluated using Cox and logistic regressions, respectively.RESULTSOverall, 96 patients had early CDI, 97 patients had late CDI, and 5,913 patients were used as controls. The risk for death was significantly higher in the early CDI group than the control group (hazard ratio [HR],1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-3.29; P=.018); there was no significant difference between the late CDI group and the control group (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.38-1.94; P=.717). Both the early CDI group (odds ratio [OR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.45-3.31; P90 days posttransplant, both the early CDI group (n=89) and the late CDI group (n=97) had increased risk for death or TOH during follow-up than the control group (n=5,734).CONCLUSIONThough our study could not prove causality, both early and late CDI occurrence in SOT recipients were associated with worse future outcomes than for SOT recipients without CDI.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:563-570.

Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis

To evaluate the frequency, possible risk factors, and outcome of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.There has been an upsurge of CDI in patients with IBD who has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Various risk factors have been found to predispose IBD patients to CDI.A retrospective case-control study on IBD patients admitted with exacerbation and tested for CDI at the Tel Aviv Medical Center in 2008 to 2013. Epidemiologic, laboratory, and prognostic data were retrieved from electronic files and compared between patients who tested positive (CDI+) or negative (CDI-) for CDI.CDI was identified in 28 of 311 (7.31%) IBD patients hospitalized with diarrhea. IBD-specific risk factors (univariate analysis) for CDI included: use of systemic steroids therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-10.6) and combinations of ≥2 immunomodulator medications (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.3). Additional risk factors for CDI that are common in the general population were hospitalization in the preceding 2 months (OR = 6.0, 95% CI 2.6-14.1), use of antacids (OR = 3.8, 95% CI 1.7-8.4), and high Charlson comorbidity score (OR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.7). A multivariate analysis confirmed that only hospitalization within the preceding 2 months and use of antacids were significant risk factors for CDI. The prognosis of CDI+ patients was similar to that of CDI- patients.Hospitalized IBD patients with exacerbation treated with antacids or recently hospitalized are at increased risk for CDI and should be tested and empirically treated until confirmation or exclusion of the infection.

Clostridium difficile-Associated Colitis Post-Transplant Is Not Associated with Elevation of Tacrolimus Concentrations

BACKGROUND

Diarrhea is a common condition after solid organ transplant (SOT); Clostridium difficile-associated colitis (CDAC) is one of the most common infections after SOT. We documented previously that some types of enteritis are associated with an elevation of tacrolimus (TAC) trough concentrations by interfering with the drug's complex metabolism.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Tacrolimus concentrations of 25 SOT recipients including 12 renal and 13 liver recipients before, during, and after CDAC were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Median age of the 25 patients was 54 y (range, 36-71), there were 15 males and 10 females. Clostridium difficile-associated colitis developed at a median of 55 d (range 2-4551) post-SOT. Median TAC concentrations prior to the outbreak of CDAC were 6.9 ng/mL (range, <1.5-17.2), 5.6 ng/mL (range, <1.5-13.2) during diarrhea, and 7.4 ng/mL (range, <1.5-24.3) after resolution of diarrhea (p > 0.05, NS). Treatment of CDAC consisted of metronidazole for 14 d in all cases. All patients recovered from CDAC but seven patients had CDAC relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to other types of infectious diarrhea such as rotavirus enteritis and cryptosporidiosis, CDAC is not associated with an increase in TAC concentrations. This is because C. difficile causes primarily colitis as opposed to other organisms, which are associated with enteritis.

Clostridium difficile Infection in Special High-Risk Populations

Antibiotic use continues to be the most important risk factor for the development of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) through disruption of the indigenous microbiota of the colon. This factor, together with environmental contamination, makes hospital and other healthcare facilities the perfect breeding ground for the infection. Several groups of patients are exposed to the hospital environment and, at the same time, affected by conditions that can make CDI more prevalent, more severe or make it present a different clinical picture. The list of such conditions appears too extensive to be reviewed in a single article. Nevertheless, several groups, including the critically ill, oncological patients, solid organ and hematopoietic transplant recipients, patients with inflammatory bowel disease, patients with kidney disease and pregnant women, have generated more attention and have been studied in more detail. On the other hand, pediatric patients constitute a controversial group because the large number of asymptomatic carriers makes interpretation of clinical findings and diagnostic tests difficult, as is the development of an appropriate approach to treatment. We present an in-depth discussion of CDI in these high-risk populations and we also review the issue of CDI in pediatric patients.

Risk Factors for Clostridium Difficile Diarrhea in Patients With Solid Organ Transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is limited knowledge about specific risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI).

METHOD

A retrospective study comparing cases of CDI in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with controls (SOT recipients who did not present CDI).

RESULTS

Thirty patients with SOT from 1340 transplantation recipients had at least 1 episode of CDI (2.23%). The accumulated incidence was 3.06% in liver transplantation, 2.78% in lung transplantation, 2.36% in kidney transplantation, and 0.33% in heart transplantation. Seven (23%) cases occurred during the first 2 months. Fifteen (50%) cases were community acquired. Colonoscopy was performed in 6 (20%) cases, but pseudomembranes were observed in only 1 (16%) case. Independent variables found to be related to CDI were previous treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; odds ratio [OR] 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-32.0), immunosuppressive regimen including mycophenolate (OR 5.2; 95%CI 1.1-18), hospitalization during the previous 3 months (OR 5.1; 95%CI 1.1-17), and antibiotic treatment during the previous month (OR 6.7; 95%CI 1.4-23). Five (16.7%) patients did not respond to the initial treatment. Recurrences were noted in 6 (20%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplant recipients presented the highest incidence. Risk factors for CDI were previous treatment with PPIs, immunosuppressive regimen containing mycophenolate, prior hospitalization, and prior antibiotic treatment.

Infection Prevention and Control Issues After Solid Organ Transplantation

Infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Consequently, infection prevention is an essential component of any organ transplant program. Given their frequent and often prolonged contact with the healthcare system, solid organ transplant recipients are at high risk for healthcare-associated infections, including those caused by antibiotic-resistant organisms. In this chapter we review several different healthcare-associated infections of importance to transplant recipients, including those caused by bacterial, viral, and fungal organisms. We also describe infection prevention and control strategies applicable to this patient population. These practices focus on clinical interventions and environmental controls designed to prevent the spread of potentially pathogenic organisms in the healthcare setting. We also describe post-exposure interventions applicable to solid organ transplant recipients exposed to potential pathogens in order to reduce their risk of subsequent infection.

Clostridium difficile infection in patients with liver disease: a review

Over the past two decades, there has been a dramatic worldwide increase in both the incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Paralleling the increased incidence of CDI in the general population, there has been increased interest in CDI among patients with liver disease, particularly in those with liver cirrhosis and post liver transplantation. MEDLINE and several other electronic databases from January 1995 to December 2014 were searched in order to identify potentially relevant literature. Patients with cirrhosis and liver transplant recipients are at high risk for the development CDI because of antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors use, frequent and prolonged hospitalization, immunosuppressant therapy, and multiple comorbidities. Enzyme immunoassay to detect C. difficile toxins A and B in stool remains the most widely used test for CDI diagnosis, although, more recently, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays have become the preferred diagnostic test in many laboratories. Metronidazole and vancomycin, given orally, have proved to be effective in the treatment of CDI. Both cirrhotic patients and liver transplant recipients with CDI have longer length of hospital stay, increased mortality, and higher healthcare costs than those without CDI. A rapid diagnosis and adequate therapy of CDI are of paramount importance to improve liver disease patients' outcome. The aim of this review is to provide up-to-date information on the epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, treatment, and outcomes in liver disease patients with CDI.

Prevalence of Clostridium difficile infection among solid organ transplant recipients: a meta-analysis of published studies

Several factors including antibiotic use, immunosuppression and frequent hospitalizations make solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients vulnerable to Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies from 1991-2014 to estimate the prevalence of CDI in this patient population. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases. Among the 75,940 retrieved citations, we found 30 studies coded from 35 articles that were relevant to our study. Based on these studies, we estimated the prevalence of CDI among 21,683 patients who underwent transplantation of kidney, liver, lungs, heart, pancreas, intestine or more than one organ and stratified each study based on the type of transplanted organ, place of the study conduction, and size of patient population. The overall estimated prevalence in SOT recipients was 7.4% [95%CI, (5.6-9.5%)] and it varied based on the type of organ transplant. The prevalence was 12.7% [95%CI, (6.4%-20.9%)] among patients who underwent transplantation for more than one organ. The prevalence among other SOT recipients was: lung 10.8% [95% CI, (5.5%-17.7%)], liver 9.1 % [95%CI, (5.8%-13.2%)], intestine 8% [95% CI, (2.6%-15.9%)], heart 5.2% [95%CI, (1.8%-10.2%)], kidney 4.7% [95% CI, (2.6%-7.3%)], and pancreas 3.2% [95% CI, (0.5%-7.9%)]. Among the studies that reported relevant data, the estimated prevalence of severe CDI was 5.3% [95% CI (2.3%-9.3%)] and the overall recurrence rate was 19.7% [95% CI, (13.7%-26.6%)]. In summary, CDI is a significant complication after SOT and preventive strategies are important in order to reduce the CDI related morbidity and mortality.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for Clostridium difficile infection: focus on immunocompromised patients

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is an emerging problem worldwide associated with significant morbidity, mortality, recurrence rates and healthcare costs. Immunosuppressed patients, including HIV-seropositive individuals, solid organ transplant recipients, patients with malignancies, hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, and patients with inflammatory bowel disease are increasingly recognized as being at higher risk of developing CDI where it may be associated with significant complications, recurrence, and mortality. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has proven to be an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of recurrent or refractory CDI in immunocompetent patients by restoring the gut microbiota and resistance to further recurrences. During the last two years the first data on FMT in immunocompromised patients began to appear in the medical literature. Herein we summarize the use of FMT for the treatment of CDI with a focus on immunocompromised patients.

Potential role of post-transplant hypogammaglobulinemia in the risk of Clostridium difficile infection after kidney transplantation: a case-control study

PURPOSE

To identify reversible risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) after kidney transplantation (KT) that could lead to a reduction in its incidence and associated complications.

METHODS

We performed a single-center case-control study in which 41 patients undergoing KT between February 2009 and July 2013 who developed a first episode of post-transplant CDI were included as cases. Patients transplanted at the same calendar day (± 2 weeks) as each case with no evidence of CDI and comparable risk exposure period were chosen as controls (2:1 ratio). Serum immunoglobulin and complement levels were systematically measured at baseline and months 1 and 6 after transplantation.

RESULTS

Multivariate regression analysis identified age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (odds ratio [OR] per unitary increment 1.31; P value = 0.043), delayed graft function (OR 2.76; P value = 0.039), prior cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease (OR 6.85; P value = 0.011) and prior acute graft rejection (OR 5.92; P value = 0.008) as risk factors for post-transplant CDI. Cases with their first episode of CDI occurring beyond the first month were more likely to have IgG hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) at month 1 (P value = 0.002), whereas cases with CDI beyond the sixth month were more likely to have HGG of any class at month 6 (P value = 0.003). Poor outcome (graft loss and/or all-cause mortality) was more common among cases (adjusted hazard ratio 5.69; P value = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of CDI exerts a detrimental effect on graft and patient outcome. Post-transplant HGG was a potentially modifiable risk factor for CDI in KT recipients.

Community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: an increasing public health threat

There has been a startling shift in the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection over the last decade worldwide, and it is now increasingly recognized as a cause of diarrhea in the community. Classically considered a hospital-acquired infection, it has now emerged in populations previously considered to be low-risk and lacking the traditional risk factors for C. difficile infection, such as increased age, hospitalization, and antibiotic exposure. Recent studies have demonstrated great genetic diversity for C. difficile, pointing toward diverse sources and a fluid genome. Environmental sources like food, water, and animals may play an important role in these infections, apart from the role symptomatic patients and asymptomatic carriers play in spore dispersal. Prospective strain typing using highly discriminatory techniques is a possible way to explore the suspected diverse sources of C. difficile infection in the community. Patients with community-acquired C. difficile infection do not necessarily have a good outcome and clinicians should be aware of factors that predict worse outcomes in order to prevent them. This article summarizes the emerging epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes for community-acquired C. difficile infection.

Outcomes of Clostridium difficile infection in recipients of solid abdominal organ transplants

Knowledge of outcomes of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is limited. To evaluate this population, we undertook a retrospective cohort study of all recipients of kidney and liver transplants diagnosed with CDI at a single center over 14 yr. Data pertaining to all episodes of CDI were collected. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was performed to determine independent predictors of clinical cure. Overall, 170 patients developed 215 episodes of CDI. Among these patients, 162 episodes (75%) were cured, and in 103 episodes (48%), patients were cured within 14 d. In a multivariate analysis, lack of clinical cure at 14 d was predicted by recurrent episode (0.21, 95% CI 0.06-0.72, p = 0.0128), treatment with vancomycin (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.1-0.74, p = 0.011), vasopressor support (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.76, p = 0.0161), and CDI before the year 2004 (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.2-0.98, p = 0.0446). The latter three factors are likely markers for severity of illness. In this cohort, 13 patients (8%) died during hospitalization, and 49 patients (29%) died within one yr. No deaths were attributed to CDI. Recurrent episode was a major predictor of treatment failure, suggesting that research into development of therapeutic options for recurrent disease is needed.

The rise of Clostridium difficile infection in lung transplant recipients in the modern era

PURPOSE

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) rates have been rising in recent years. We aimed to characterize CDI in lung transplant recipients in the modern era and hypothesized that CDI would increase the mortality risk.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing transplantation at our center from 1/2006 to 7/2011. Attributes of CDI+ and CDI- groups were compared using Student's t- and chi-square tests (α = 0.05). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to control for confounding factors.

RESULTS

Overall CDI incidence was 22.5%. Seven of 151 patients (4.6%) developed CDI during the initial hospitalization after transplantation (mean time 10.6 ± 6 d) while 27 patients (19.7%) developed CDI after discharge (mean time 467 ± 471 d). Incidence rate was 224.6 cases/100 000 patient-days compared to 110 cases/100 000 patient-days (rate for entire hospital). CDI was not predictive of mortality (HR 2.06, 95% CI 0.94-4.52).

CONCLUSION

CDI rates in lung transplant recipients are high in the modern era. No risk factors for CDI were identified. Although not statistically significant, CDI+ patients had a higher risk of death. The economic burden of CDI and trend toward worse outcomes for CDI patients have important implications for post-operative surveillance of CDI-related complications and need for CDI prophylaxis.

Outcome of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in solid organ transplant recipients: a prospective and multicentre cohort study

Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) is the most common cause of nosocomial diarrhea. Information about CDAD in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is scarce. To determine its epidemiology and risk factors, we conducted a cohort study in which 4472 SOT patients were prospectively included in the RESITRA/REIPI (Spanish Research Network for the Study of Infection in Transplantation) database between July 2003 and July 2006. Forty-two episodes of CDAD were diagnosed in 36 patients. The overall incidence was 0.94%. Median onset of infection was 31.5 days (range 6-741); in half the cases, onset occurred during the first month after transplantation. In 26% of cases, there was no previous antibiotic use. Independent risk factors for CDAD using Cox regression analysis were previous use of first- and second-generation cephalosporins (HR 3.68; 95%CI 1.8-7.52; P < 0.001), ganciclovir prophylactic use (HR 3.09; 95%CI 1.44-6.62; P = 0.004) and corticosteroid use before transplantation (HR 2.95; 95%CI 1.1-7.9; P = 0.031). There were no deaths related to CDAD. In summary, the incidence of CDAD in SOT was low, most cases were diagnosed soon after transplantation and the prognosis was good.

Effect of biotherapeutics on antitoxin IgG in experimentally induced Clostridium difficile infection

PURPOSE

Recurrent diarrhoea after successful treatment of primary Clostridium difficile associated disease (CDAD) occurs due to bowel flora alterations and failure to mount an effective antibody response. Apart from antibiotics, risk factors include immunosuppressive and acid-suppressive drug administration. Biotherapeutics such as probiotic and epidermal growth factor (EGF) may offer potential effective therapy for CDAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The effect of biotherapeutics in mounting an antibody response against C. difficile toxins was studied in BALB/c mice challenged with C. difficile after pre-treatment with ampicillin, lansoprazole or cyclosporin. Sera from sacrificed animals were estimated for antitoxin IgG by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Antitoxin IgG was significantly higher (P<0.05) in C. difficile challenged groups compared to unchallenged controls, but insignificant (P>0.05) in animals in which C. difficile was given after pre-treatment with cyclosporin compared to those without any pre-treatment, or pre-treatment with antibiotic or lansoprazole. In inter-subgroup comparisons also significant anomaly in production of antitoxin IgG was found. The antitoxin IgG levels were raised in animals administered C. difficile after pre-treatment with ampicillin, but lower in animals administered cyclosporin. High levels of antitoxin IgG were also found in the serum samples of animals receiving lansoprazole and C. difficile.

CONCLUSIONS

Probiotics showed their beneficial effect by boosting the immune response as seen by production of antitoxin IgG. Oral administration of EGF did not affect the immune response to C. difficile toxins as significant increase was not observed in the serum antitoxin IgG levels in any of the groups investigated.

Diarrhea in the immunocompromised patient

Diarrhea is a common problem in patients with immunocompromising conditions. The etiologic spectrum differs from patients with diarrhea who have a normal immune system. This article reviews the most important causes of diarrhea in immunocompromised patients, ranging from infectious causes to noninfectious causes of diarrhea in the setting of HIV infection as a model for other conditions of immunosuppression. It also deals with diarrhea in specific situations, eg, after hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation, diarrhea induced by immunosuppressive drugs, and diarrhea in congenital immunodeficiency syndromes.

Clostridium difficile colitis: increasing incidence, risk factors, and outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) is an increasingly important diagnosis in solid organ transplant recipients, with rising incidence and mortality. We describe the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of colectomy for CDAD after solid organ transplantation.

METHODS

Patients with CDAD were identified from a prospective transplant database. Complicated Clostridium difficile colitis (CCDC) was defined as CDAD associated with graft loss, total colectomy, or death.

RESULTS

From 1999 to 2010, we performed solid organ transplants for 1331 recipients at our institution. The incidence of CDAD was 12.4% (165 patients); it increased from 4.5% (1999) to 21.1% (2005) and finally 9.5% (2010). The peak frequency of CDAD was between 6 and 10 days posttransplantation. Age more than 55 years (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.16-1.81), induction with antithymocyte globulin (HR: 1.43, 95% CI=1.075-1.94), and transplant other than kidney alone (liver, heart, pancreas, or combined kidney organ) (HR: 1.41, 95% CI=1.05-1.92) were significant independent risk factors for CDAD. CCDC occurred in 15.8% of CDAD cases. Independent predictors of CCDC were white blood cell count more than 25,000/μL (HR: 1.08, 95% CI=1.025-1.15) and evidence of pancolitis on computed tomography scan (HR: 2.52, 95% CI=1.195-5.35). Six patients with CCDC underwent colectomy with 83% patient survival and 20% graft loss. Of the medically treated patients with CCDC (n=20), the patient survival was 35% with 100% graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified significant risk factors for CDAD and predictors of progression to CCDC. Furthermore, we found that colectomy can be performed with excellent survival in selected patients.

Clostridium difficile: epidemiology, pathogenesis, management, and prevention of a recalcitrant healthcare-associated pathogen

Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of healthcare-associated infectious diarrhea. Although C difficile is part of normal flora in some healthy individuals, patients with selective risk factors are often vulnerable to the toxigenic potential of this virulent healthcare pathogen. The spectrum of C difficile infection (CDI) is highly variable, ranging from mild to severe illness, presenting with single to multiple disease recurrences. Current approaches to treatment are based on severity of illness, number of recurrences, and clinical presentation. Oral vancomycin and metronidazole have formed the foundation for treatment of CDI, but therapeutic failures are commonly reported, especially involving hypervirulent clones. Alternative therapies, including newer antimicrobials, probiotics, immunotherapy, and fecal transplantation, have all met with varying degrees of efficacy. Although toxigenic culture (TC) testing from anaerobic culture remains the gold standard, newer technologies, including enzyme immunoassay, common antigen (glutamate dehydrogenase) testing, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are less time-consuming and rapid. However, TC and PCR have reported high specificity and sensitivity when compared with other laboratory tests. Because of the significant morbidity and mortality associated with CDI, a high index of suspicion is warranted. Prevention and eradication of CDI require a multidisciplinary approach, including early disease recognition through appropriate surveillance, implementation of effective contact isolation strategies, adherence to environmental controls, judicious hand hygiene, evidence-based treatment, and management that includes antibiotic stewardship, continuous education of healthcare workers, and administrative support.

Cryptosporidium enteritis in solid organ transplant recipients: multicenter retrospective evaluation of 10 cases reveals an association with elevated tacrolimus concentrations

BACKGROUND

Cryptosporidial enteritis, a diarrheal infection of the small intestine caused by the apicomplexan protozoa Cryptosporidium, is infrequently recognized in transplant recipients from developed countries.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all cases of cryptosporidiosis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients at 2 centers from January 2001 to October 2010 was performed and compared with transplant recipients with community-onset Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). A literature search was performed with regard to reported cases of cryptosporidiosis in SOT recipients.

RESULTS

Eight renal, 1 liver, and 1 lung transplant recipient were diagnosed with cryptosporidiosis at median 46.0 months (interquartile range [IQR] 25.2-62.8) following SOT. Symptoms existed for a median 14 days (IQR 10.5-14.8) before diagnosis. For the 9 patients receiving tacrolimus (TAC), mean TAC levels increased from 6.3 ± 1.1 to 21.3 ± 9.2 ng/mL (P = 0.0007) and median serum creatinine increased temporarily from 1.3 (IQR 1.1-1.7) to 2.4 (IQR 2.0-4.6) mg/dL (P = 0.008). By comparison, 8 SOT recipients (6 kidney, 2 liver) hospitalized with community-onset CDI had a mean TAC level of 10.8 ± 2.8 ng/dL during disease compared with 9.2 ± 2.3 ng/mL at baseline (P = 0.07) and had no change in median creatinine. All patients recovered from Cryptosporidium enteritis after receiving various chemotherapeutic regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryptosporidiosis should be recognized as an important cause of diarrhea after SOT and is associated with elevated TAC levels and acute kidney injury. Increased TAC levels may reflect altered drug metabolism in the small intestine.

Fulminant Clostridium difficile toxic megacolon in a pediatric heart transplant recipient

CD can be a cause of diarrhea in pediatric heart transplant recipients. Fulminant colitis can develop in immunocompromised patients with CD and progress to toxic megacolon. We report a case of a 10-yr-old girl who developed CD diarrhea and subsequently fulminant colitis with clinical signs and symptoms of abdominal compartment syndrome. She was taken to the operating room emergently and found to have toxic megacolon. She underwent a sub-total abdominal colectomy and end-ileostomy, and made a rapid recovery. Rapid recognition of the severity of the disease in the post-operative transplant patient is imperative as abdominal compartment syndrome may develop requiring surgical management. In pediatric heart transplant patients with diarrhea, we recommend a heightened clinical awareness with aggressive treatment given the risk of progression to fulminant CD and toxic megacolon.

Clostridium difficile infection in HIV-seropositive individuals and transplant recipients

Immunocompromise is a commonly cited risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). We reviewed the experimental and epidemiological literature on CDI in three immunocompromised groups, HIV-seropositive individuals, haematopoietic stem cell or bone marrow transplant recipients and solid organ transplant recipients. All three groups have varying degrees of impairment of humoral immunity, a major factor influencing the outcome of CDI. Soluble HIV proteins such as nef and immunosuppressive agents such as cyclosporin, azathioprine and mycophenalate mofetil modify signalling from the key cellular pathways triggered by C. difficile toxin A, although there is a paucity of data on how these factors may interact with pathways activated by toxin B. Despite this, there has been little direct investigation into the effect of immunosuppression on the pathogenesis of CDI. Epidemiological studies consistently show increased rates of CDI in these populations, which are higher in those with greater degrees of immunocompromise such as individuals with advanced AIDS not receiving combination antiretroviral therapy or allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Less consistently data suggests immunocompromise in each group also impacts rates of severe, recurrent or complicated CDI. However all these conditions are characterised by high levels of antibiotic use and prolonged hospital stay, both powerful drivers of CDI risk.

Clostridium difficile infection: clinical spectrum and approach to management

Clostridium difficile is recognized globally as an important enteric pathogen associated with considerable morbidity and mortality due to the widespread use of antibiotics. The overall incidence of C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) is increasing due to the emergence of a hypervirulent strain known as NAP1/BI/027. C. difficile acquisition by a host can result in a varied spectrum of clinical conditions inclusive of both colonic and extracolonic manifestations. Repeated occurrence of CDAD, manifested by the sudden re-appearance of diarrhea and other symptoms usually within a week of stopping treatment, makes it a difficult clinical problem. C. difficile infection has also been reported to be involved in exacerbation of inflammatory bowel diseases. The first step in the management of a suspected CDAD case is the withdrawal of the offending agent and changing the antibiotic regimens. Antimicrobial therapy directed against C. difficile viz. metronidazole for mild cases and vancomycin for severe cases is needed. For patients with ileus, oral vancomycin with simultaneous intravenous (IV) metronidazole and intracolonic vancomycin may be given. Depending on the severity of disease, the further line of management may include surgery, IV immunoglobulin treatment or high dose of vancomycin. Adjunctive measures used for CDAD are probiotics and prebiotics, fecotherapy, adsorbents and immunoglobulin therapy. Among the new therapies fidaxomicin has recently been approved by the American Food and Drugs Administration for treatment of CDAD.

Clostridium difficile infection in non-HIV-immunocompromised patients and in HIV-infected patients

Clostridium difficile infection is a common cause of morbidity in patients with HIV infection and in patients with non-HIV immune deficiency. The frequency of C. difficile--associated diarrhea (CDAD) seen in these two patient populations has been attributed to immune deficiency, as well as to increased exposure to hospital environments and antibiotic therapy, both of which are major risk factors for CDAD. This article reviews recent data useful in the evaluation, treatment, and prevention of C. difficile infection in these patient groups. Recent publications relating to C. difficile infection in specific immunocompromised conditions are also discussed.

Practice of gastroenterologists in treating flaring inflammatory bowel disease patients with clostridium difficile: antibiotics alone or combined antibiotics/immunomodulators?

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in flaring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients has not been defined. Limited data suggest that coadministration of immunomodulators (IM) with antibiotics (AB) results in a worse outcome. We investigated the prevalent practice among North American gastroenterologists in this scenario.

METHODS

A structured questionnaire presented the clinical cases of two hospitalized patients with ulcerative colitis and concomitant CDI, either with or without prior IM treatment. The questionnaire was distributed to a sample of gastroenterologists at medical centers across North America. Respondents were requested to denote their therapeutic choices for these patients.

RESULTS

The survey included 169 gastroenterologists, 122 from the US and 47 from Canada, with an average of 12 ± 10 years of experience in gastroenterology. Forty-two (25%) of the respondents were IBD experts. Seventy-seven (46%) respondents elected to add an IM in combination with AB, whereas 82/169 (54%) treated the flare with AB alone (P = NS). The rate of administering combined AB+IM was similar for the IBD experts and the non-IBD experts. Only 11% of respondents withdrew maintenance azathioprine upon the diagnosis of CDI. More IBD experts stopped azathioprine treatment compared to the non-IBD experts (12/42 versus 6/127, P < 0.001). Overall, 65% of surveyed gastroenterologists stated they believe these patients are afflicted by two simultaneous but separate disease processes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant disagreement among gastroenterologists on whether combination AB+IM or AB alone should be given to IBD patients with CDI-associated flares. Controlled trials are needed to investigate the optimal management approach to this clinical dilemma.

Impact of Clostridium difficile infection in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is becoming prevalent in general population as well as in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

AIM

The aim of the study was to identify risk factors for CDI in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and to assess outcome of UC in patients following CDI.

METHODS

UC inpatients or outpatients who had positive results for C. difficile toxins A and B between 2000 and 2006 were identified (N=39) and matched for age and gender to UC patients who were negative C. difficile toxins and had never been diagnosed with CDI (N=39). Records were reviewed for adverse clinical outcome, defined as colectomy within 3 months of C. difficile testing. Conditional logistic regression was used to analyze multivariable association to identify risk factors for CDI and for adverse clinical outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 78 subjects were analyzed, 60% were males. Median age was 39. Among 39 patients with CDI, 20 (47.2%) were diagnosed as outpatients, 50% failed treatment with the first antibiotic monotherapy, and 21.2% had recurrent infection. Antibiotic exposure within 30 days prior to C. difficile testing was found to be associated with an increased risk for CDI with an odds ratio of 12.0 (95% CI 1.2, 124.2) Subsequent colectomy within 3 months after CDI diagnosis, was not associated with CDI in both univariable and multivariable analyses. After adjusting for CDI, lack of 5-aminosalicylic acid (ASA) in the treatment regimen was significantly associated with colectomy with an odds ratio of 3.3 (95% CI: 1.2, 9.4). There was no UC- or CDI-associated mortality in this case series.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent antibiotic exposure was a risk factor for CDI in UC patients. Interestingly, CDI does not seem to adversely affect short-term adverse clinical outcome (colectomy).

Clostridium difficile infection and inflammatory bowel disease: Understanding the evolving relationship

Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection (CDI) is the leading identifiable cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. While there is an alarming trend of increasing incidence and severity of CDI in the United States and Europe, superimposed CDI in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has drawn considerable attention in the gastrointestinal community. The majority of IBD patients appear to contract CDI as outpatients. C. difficile affects disease course of IBD in several ways, including triggering disease flares, sustaining activity, and in some cases, acting as an “innocent” bystander. Despite its wide spectrum of presentations, CDI has been reported to be associated with a longer duration of hospitalization and a higher mortality in IBD patients. IBD patients with restorative proctocolectomy or with diverting ileostomy are not immune to CDI of the small bowel or ileal pouch. Whether immunomodulator or corticosteroid therapy for IBD should be continued in patients with superimposed CDI is controversial. It appears that more adverse outcomes was observed among patients treated by a combination of immunomodulators and antibiotics than those treated by antibiotics alone. The use of biologic agents does not appear to increase the risk of acquisition of CDI. For CDI in the setting of underlying IBD, vancomycin appears to be more efficacious than metronidazole. Randomized controlled trials are required to clearly define the appropriate management for CDI in patients with IBD.

Glucocorticoids are associated with increased risk of short-term mortality in hospitalized patients with clostridium difficile-associated disease

OBJECTIVES

Glucocorticoids are commonly used to treat various illnesses in patients at risk for Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD), but the effect of such immunosuppression on outcome has not been studied. We hypothesized that glucocorticoid use increases the risk of 30-day mortality in patients with CDAD.

METHODS

We identified consecutive inpatients from 1 January 2004 to 30 September 2008, who had a positive Clostridium difficile toxin assay and recorded their demography, glucocorticoid usage before CDAD diagnosis, 30-day mortality, Charlson comorbidity score, and pertinent laboratory data. Three cohorts were created: Group 1: CDAD (+) without glucocorticoid use, Group 2: CDAD (+) with glucocorticoid use, and Group 3: CDAD (-) with symptomatic diarrhea and receiving glucocorticoids.

RESULTS

Groups 1, 2, and 3 consisted of 841, 285, and 898 patients, respectively. Significant multivariate predictors of short-term mortality were age in Group 1 (P<0.001); age (P=0.007), Charlson score (P=0.004), and an endocrine indication for glucocorticoid use (P<0.01) in Group 2; and age (P<0.001), sex, (P=0.02), Charlson score (P<0.001), weight-adjusted glucocorticoid dose (1.10+/-0.03), and prednisone use (P<0.01) in Group 3. When considering all patients with CDAD (Groups 1 and 2), the use of any glucocorticoid resulted in an increased mortality with a hazard ratio of 2.1+/-0.19 (P<0.001). Mortality rates were 9.6%, 19.3%, and 9.7% for Groups 1, 2, and 3 (P<0.001 for Groups 1 and 3 vs. Group 2), respectively. Through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, comparing the three groups revealed that patients with CDAD who received glucocorticoids were at significantly increased risk of short-term mortality compared with the control groups (Groups 1 and 3, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality of patients with CDAD on glucocorticoids, regardless of the severity of CDAD, was significantly higher than the mortality of patients with CDAD not on glucocorticoids and those on glucocorticoids with symptomatic diarrhea and without C. difficile infection.

C. difficile colitis--predictors of fatal outcome

PURPOSE

Clostridium difficile colitis (CDC) has a clinical spectrum ranging from mild diarrhea to fulminant, potentially fatal colitis. The pathophysiology for this variation remains poorly understood. A total abdominal colectomy may be lifesaving if performed before the point of no return. Identification of negative prognostic factors is desperately needed for optimization of the clinical and operative management.

METHODS

In-patients with CDC between 1999 and 2006 were identified through the discharge database (ICD-9: 008.45). Of these, patients with positive ELISA toxin or biopsy were included. Excluded were ELISA-negative patients. Data collected included general demographics, underlying medical conditions, APACHE II score, clinical and laboratory data, and duration of the medical treatment. Mortality and cure were the two endpoints. Regression analysis was used to identify parameters associated with mortality.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-eight patients (mean age 59, range 19-94) with CDC were analyzed. Fourteen patients (3.52%) underwent surgery. Mortality in the cohort was 10.3% (41/398 patients). Patients with fatal outcome had a longer pre-CDC hospital stay (11 vs. 6 days). Mortality was significantly (p<0.05) associated with a higher APACHE II score, a higher ASA class, a lower diastolic blood pressure, preexisting pulmonary and renal disease, use of steroids, evidence of toxic megacolon, higher WBCs, and clinical signs of sepsis and organ dysfunction (renal and pulmonary). Parameters without significant difference (p>0.05) included patient age, albumin, clinical presentation/examination parameters, and transplant status, other than the mentioned comorbidities. Of the 41 fatal outcomes, five patients (12.2%) underwent surgery, and 36 did not (87.8%). Mortality rate of the surgical group was 35.7% (four out of 14 patients). Comparison of the fatalities not undergoing surgery with the survivors revealed decreased clinical signs, suggesting a masking of the disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified several clinical factors, which were associated with mortality from CDC. Future clinical studies will have to focus on the disease progression and the fatalities occurring either without an attempt for or despite surgical intervention, as an earlier intervention might have proven lifesaving.

Combination immunomodulator and antibiotic treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and clostridium difficile infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Management of Clostridium difficile infection in patients with flaring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been optimized. We investigated the effects of combination therapy with antibiotics and immunomodulators in patients with IBD and C difficile infection.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 155 patients (59% with ulcerative colitis [UC]) from a retrospective, European Crohn's and Colitis organization, multi-center study comparing outcome of hospitalized IBD patients with C difficile infection who were treated with antibiotics (n = 51) or antibiotics and immunomodulators (n = 104). The primary composite outcome was death or colectomy within 3 months of admission, in-hospital megacolon, bowel perforation, hemodynamic shock, or respiratory failure.

RESULTS

The primary outcome occurred in 12% of patients given the combination treatment vs none of the patients given antibiotics alone (P = .01). UC, abdominal tenderness, or severe bloody diarrhea was more common among patients that received the combined therapy. However, multivariate analysis revealed that only the combination therapy maintained a trend for an independent association with the primary outcome (likelihood ratio = 11.9; CI, 0.9-157; P = .06). Treatment with 2 or 3 immunomodulators was correlated with the primary outcome, independent of disease severity at presentation (odds ratio [OR] = 17; CI, 3.2-91; P < .01). Acid-suppressing medications increased the risk of C difficile relapse (OR = 3.8; CI, 1.1-12.9; P = .03), whereas recent hospitalization correlated with increased rate of C difficile persistence (OR = 8; CI, 2.1-29; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBD that also have C difficile infection are frequently treated with a combination of antibiotics and immunomodulators. However, this combination tends to associate with a worse outcome than antibiotic therapy alone. Prospective controlled trials are urgently needed to optimize the management of these challenging patients.

Clostridium difficile infection in solid organ transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a general understanding of Clostridium difficile infection with a focus on recent publications that evaluate the disease in solid organ transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of C. difficile infection is increasing worldwide. Epidemics due to a hypervirulent C. difficile strain are associated with an escalating severity of disease. New evidence further supports basing initial treatment choice on disease severity.

SUMMARY

C. difficile is a significant pathogen in solid organ transplant recipients. Multiple risk factors are found in this population that may result in more severe disease. A high index of suspicion is necessary for the early diagnosis and treatment of C. difficile infection in transplant recipients. Metronidazole and vancomycin show equivalent efficacy in the treatment for mild-to-moderate disease, but vancomycin has demonstrated superiority in the treatment of severe disease. Surgical intervention is also an important consideration in the treatment of solid organ transplant recipients with severe colitis. Rigorous infection control practices are essential for preventing the spread of C. difficile within the hospital environment.