Psychomotor recovery following propofol or isoflurane anaesthesia for day-care surgery

Psychomotor and cognitive effects of 15-minute inhalation of methoxyflurane in healthy volunteers: implication for post-colonoscopy care

Background and study aims: Colonoscopy with portal inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox) is highly feasible with low sedation risk and allows earlier discharge. It is unclear if subjects can return to highly skilled psychomotor skill task shortly after Penthrox assisted colonoscopy. We evaluated the psychomotor and cognitive effects of 15-minute inhalation of Penthrox in adults. Patients and methods: Sixty healthy volunteers (18 to 80 years) were studied on 2 occasions with either Penthrox or placebo in a randomized, double-blind fashion. On each occasion, the subject's psychomotor function was examined before, immediately, 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min after a 15-minute inhalation of studied drug, using validated psychomotor tests (Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), auditory reaction time (ART), eye-hand coordination (EHC) test, trail making test (TMT) and logical reasoning test (LRT). Results: Compared to placebo, a 15-minute Penthrox inhalation led to an immediate but small impairment of DSST (P < 0.001), ART (P < 0.001), EHC (P < 0.01), TMT (P = 0.02) and LRT (P = 0.04). In all subjects, the performance of all 5 tests normalized by 30 minutes after inhalation, and was comparable to that with placebo. Although increasing age was associated with a small deterioration in psychomotor testing performance, the magnitude of Penthrox effects remained comparable among all age groups. Conclusions: In all age groups, a 15-minute Penthrox inhalation induces acute but short-lasting impairment of psychomotor and cognitive performance, which returns to normal within 30 minutes , indicating that subjects who have colonoscopy with Penthrox can return to highly skilled psychomotor skills tasks such as driving and daily work the same day.

Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review

In this systematic review we focused on postoperative recovery and complications using four different anesthetic techniques. The database MEDLINE was searched via PubMed (1966 to June 2002) using the search words "anesthesia" and with ambulatory surgical procedures limited to randomized controlled trials in adults (>19 yr), in the English language, and in humans. A second search strategy was used combining two of the words "propofol," "isoflurane," "sevoflurane," or "desflurane". Screening and data extraction produced 58 articles that were included in the final meta-analysis. No differences were found between propofol and isoflurane in early recovery. However, early recovery was faster with desflurane compared with propofol and isoflurane and with sevoflurane compared with isoflurane. A minor difference was found in home readiness between sevoflurane and isoflurane (5 min) but not among the other anesthetics. Nausea, vomiting, headache, and postdischarge nausea and vomiting incidence were in favor of propofol compared with isoflurane (P < 0.05). A larger number of patients in the inhaled anesthesia groups required antiemetics compared with the propofol group. We conclude that the differences in early recovery times among the different anesthetics were small and in favor of the inhaled anesthetics. The incidence of side effects, specifically postoperative nausea and vomiting, was less frequent with propofol.

IMPLICATIONS

A systematic analysis of the literature comparing postoperative recovery after propofol, isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane-based anesthesia in adults demonstrated that early recovery was faster in the desflurane and sevoflurane groups. The incidence of nausea and vomiting were less frequent with propofol.

Usefulness of Posturography after Epidural Block

After a nerve block, observation of the course of effects is necessary until discharge of patients. Particularly epidural block in the lumbar region markedly affects ambulation and postural stability. Although there are few methods of objective evaluation of the postural stability, safe and early discharge is desired. We evaluated the influences of epidural block with 5 ml of 1% lidocaine on equilibrium before as well as 30, 60 and 90 minutes after epidural block. Computerized posturography allows the objective evaluation and quantitative assessment of impairment of receptors and the central nervous system involved in the maintenance of postural stability by analyzing of results. Locus length per unit area with the eyes open and that with the eyes closed 30 minutes after epidural block (27.339 +/- 11.761 cm and 25.804 +/- 10.561 cm, respectively) were significantly (P = 0.0067 and 0.0175, respectively) higher than baseline values (19.528 +/- 8.240 cm and 19.496 +/- 7.450 cm, respectively). Sway area with the eyes open 30 minutes after epidural block (3.923 +/- 2.494 cm2) was significantly (P = 0.0190) larger than the baseline value (2.533 +/- 1.309 cm2). These results suggest that marked effect remain after epidural block even when standing appears to be stable, and the observation of the course of effects after epidural block is still necessary for the safety of patients. We considered that locus length per unit area is a useful parameter for the assessment of an early discharge.

Cricoid yoke: the effect of surface area and applied force on discomfort experienced by conscious volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The application of cricoid force is central to techniques that reduce the risk of gastric regurgitation and the subsequent pulmonary aspiration associated with obstetric and emergency anaesthesia. The discomfort associated with cricoid force in awake preoperative patients increases the incidence of coughing, struggling and pain during induction of anaesthesia. This study determined if increasing the surface area of a cricoid yoke reduced the associated discomfort in volunteers.

METHODS

Fifty volunteers participated in a randomized single-blinded study. The cricoid yoke was positioned using standard anatomical landmarks and forces of 10, 20, 30 and 40 N were applied in a random order for 20s, using two different yoke attachments with surface areas of 3 and 10 cm2. A rest of 30s was allowed between the application of forces. Discomfort was graded by volunteers on a scale from 0 to 10 (0: no discomfort; 10: worse discomfort imaginable). A score of 10 was allocated if the volunteers could not tolerate the applied force for 20s.

RESULTS

Median scores for the small yoke were always higher than those for the large yoke at each force. There were significant differences between the scores for the small and large yokes at 10 and 20 N (P < 0.001) and 30 N (P = 0.0233), but there was no significant difference at 40 N.

CONCLUSIONS

The larger yoke was tolerated better by volunteers when clinically relevant cricoid forces were applied.

Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In some situations, the use of muscle relaxants (neuromuscular blocking drugs) are undesirable or contraindicated. We compared intubating conditions without muscle relaxants in premedicated patients receiving either alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2, 3 or 4 microg kg(-1) followed by propofol 2 mg kg(-1).

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind study, 80 healthy patients were assigned to one of four groups (n = 20). After intravenous atropine, alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2, 3 or 4 microg kg(-1) were injected over 90 s followed by propofol 2 mg kg(-1). Ninety seconds after administration of the propofol, laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were attempted. Intubating conditions were assessed as excellent, good or poor on the basis of ease of lung ventilation, jaw relaxation, laryngoscopy, position of the vocal cords, and patient response to intubation and slow inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff.

RESULTS

Seven patients who received remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1) and one patient who received remifentanil 3 microg kg(-1) could not be intubated at the first attempts. Excellent intubating conditions (jaw relaxed, vocal cords open and no movement in response to tracheal intubation and cuff inflation) were observed in those who received either alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) (45% of patients) or remifentanil in doses of 2 microg kg(-1) (20%), 3 microg kg(-1) (75%) or 4 microg kg(-1) (95%). Overall, intubating conditions were significantly better (P < 0.05), and the number of patients showing excellent conditions were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in patients who received remifentanil 4 microg kg(-1) compared with those who received alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1). No patient needed treatment for hypotension or bradycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

Remifentanil 4 microg kg(-1) and propofol 2 mg kg(-1) administered in sequence intravenously provided good or excellent conditions for tracheal intubation in all patients without the use of muscle relaxants.

Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is a new laryngeal mask airway with a modified cuff and drainage tube. We compared oropharyngeal leak pressure, intracuff pressure and anatomical position (assessed fibreoptically) for the Size 5 LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the classic laryngeal mask airway in different head-neck positions and using different intracuff inflation volumes.

METHODS

Thirty paralysed anaesthetized adult male patients were studied. The LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the classic laryngeal mask airway were inserted into each patient in random order. The oropharyngeal leak pressure, intracuff pressure, and anatomical position of the airway tube and drainage tube (LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway only) were documented in four head and neck positions (neutral first, then flexion, extension and rotation in random order), and at 0-40 mL cuff volumes in the neutral position in 10 mL increments.

RESULTS

Compared with the neutral position, the oropharyngeal leak pressure for both the LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the classic laryngeal mask airway was higher in flexion and rotation (all P < or = 0.02), but lower in extension (all P < or = 0.01). Changes in head-neck position did not alter the anatomical position of the airway tube or the drainage tube. The oropharyngeal leak pressure was always higher for the LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (all P < or = 0.005) and anatomical position better for the classic laryngeal mask airway (all P < or = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomical position of the LMA-ProSeal and the classic laryngeal mask airway is stable in different head-neck positions, but head-neck flexion and rotation are associated with an increase, and head-neck extension a decrease, in oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure. The Size 5 LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is capable of forming a more effective seal than the Size 5 classic laryngeal mask airway in males.

Breathing pattern and workload during automatic tube compensation, pressure support and T-piece trials in weaning patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Automatic tube compensation has been designed as a new ventilatory mode to compensate for the non-linear resistance of the endotracheal tube. The study investigated the effects of automatic tube compensation compared with breathing through a T-piece or pressure support during a trial of spontaneous breathing used for weaning patients from mechanical ventilation of the lungs.

METHODS

Twelve patients were studied who were ready for weaning after prolonged mechanical ventilation (10.2 +/- 8.4 days) due to acute respiratory failure. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were excluded. Thirty minutes of automatic tube compensation were compared with 30 min periods of 7 cmH2O pressure support and T-piece breathing. Breathing patterns and workload indices were measured at the end of each study period.

RESULTS

During T-piece breathing, the peak inspiratory flow rate (0.65 +/- 0.20 L s(-1)) and minute ventilation (8.9 +/- 2.7L min(-1)) were lower than during either pressure support (peak inspiratory flow rate 0.81 +/- 0.25 L s(-1) minute ventilation 10.2 +/- 2.3 L min(-1), respectively) or automatic tube compensation (peak inspiratory flow rate 0.75 +/- 0.26L s(-1); minute ventilation 10.8 +/- 2.7 L min(-1)). The pressure-time product as well as patients' work of breathing were comparable during automatic tube compensation (pressure-time product 214.5 +/- 104.6 cmH2O s(-1) min(-1), patient work of breathing 1.1 +/- 0.4 J L(-1)) and T-piece breathing (pressure-time product 208.3 +/- 121.6 cmH2O s(-1) min(-1), patient work of breathing 1.1 +/- 0.4 J L(-1)), whereas pressure support resulted in a significant decrease in workload indices (pressure-time product 121.2 +/- 64.1 cmH2O s(-1) min(-1), patient work of breathing 0.7 +/- 0.4 J L(-1)).

CONCLUSIONS

In weaning from mechanical lung ventilation, patients' work of breathing during spontaneous breathing trials is clearly reduced by the application of pressure support 7 cmH2O, whereas the workload during automatic tube compensation corresponded closely to the values during trials of breathing through a T-piece.

Anaesthetic agents in adult day case surgery

This study reports a review of all comparative published studies of adult day case anaesthesia in the English language up to December 2000. Ten databases were searched using appropriate keywords and data were extracted in a standardized fashion. One hundred-and-one published studies were examined. Recovery measurements were grouped as early, intermediate, late, psychomotor and adverse effects. With respect to induction of anaesthesia, propofol was superior to methohexital, etomidate and thiopental, but equal to sevoflurane and desflurane. Desflurane and sevoflurane were both superior to thiopental. There was no detectable difference between sevoflurane and isoflurane. With respect to the maintenance of anaesthesia, isoflurane and halothane were the worst. There were no significant differences between propofol, desflurane, sevoflurane and enflurane. Propofol is the induction agent of choice in day case patients. The use of a propofol infusion and avoidance of nitrous oxide may help to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Preoperative bedside screening tests for difficult tracheal intubation may be neither sensitive nor specific enough for clinical use. The aim was to investigate if a combination of the Mallampati classification of the oropharyngeal view with either the thyromental or sternomental distance measurement improved the predictive value.

METHODS

A total of 212 (109 male, 103 female) non-obstetric surgical patients, aged >18 yr, undergoing elective surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation were assessed preoperatively with respect to the oropharyngeal (modified Mallampati) classification, thyromental and sternomental distances. An experienced anaesthetist, blinded to the preoperative airway assessment, performed laryngoscopy and graded the view according to Cormack and Lehane's classification.

RESULTS

Twenty tracheal intubations (9%) were difficult as defined by a Cormack and Lehane Grade 3 or 4, or the requirement for a bougie in patients with Cormack and Lehane Grade 2. Used alone, the Mallampati oropharyngeal view, and thyromental and sternomental distances were associated with poor sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values. Combining the Mallampati Class III or IV with either a thyromental distance <6.5cm or a sternomental distance <12.5cm decreased the sensitivity (from 40 to 25 and 20%, respectively), but maintained a negative predictive value of 93%. The specificity and positive predictive values increased from 89 and 27% respectively for Mallampati alone to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the Mallampati classification, in conjunction with measurement of the thyromental and sternomental distances, may be a useful routine screening test for preoperative prediction of difficult tracheal intubation.

Remifentanil versus alfentanil in total intravenous anaesthesia for day case surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We assessed the intraoperative haemodynamic responses and recovery profiles of total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil and alfentanil for outpatient surgery.

METHODS

Patients in Group 1 (n = 20) received alfentanil 20 microg kg(-1) followed by 2 microg kg(-1) min(-1) intravenously; patients in Group 2 (n = 20) received remifentanil 1 microg kg(-1) followed by 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1) intravenously. Both groups then received propofol 2 mg kg(-1) followed by 9 mg kg(-1) h(-1) intravenously. Five minutes after skin incision, infusion rates were decreased, and at the end of surgery, all infusions were discontinued. Early recovery was assessed by the Aldrete score, whereas intermediate recovery was assessed with the postanaesthetic discharge scoring system (PADS).

RESULTS

Perioperative arterial pressure was similar in both groups; heart rate was lower in Group 2 (P < 0.05). The times to spontaneous and adequate respiration, response to verbal commands, extubation and times for Aldrete score > or = 9 were shorter in Group 2 patients (P < 0.05). Pain scores were higher in Group 2 patients (P < 0.05). Overall times for postanaesthetic discharge scores > or = 9 were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Early recovery of patients after day surgery is significantly shorter after total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil compared with that with alfentanil but postoperative pain management must be planned ahead.

Effects of different doses of oral ketamine for premedication of children

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A need exists for a safe and effective oral preanaesthetic medication for use in children undergoing elective surgery. The study sought to define the dose of oral ketamine that would facilitate induction of anaesthesia without causing significant side-effects.

METHODS

We studied 80 children undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia who received oral ketamine 4, 6 or 8 mg kg(-1) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study. We compared the reaction to separation from parents, transport to the operating room, the response to intravenous cannula insertion and application of an anaesthetic facemask, the induction of anaesthesia and recovery from anaesthesia.

RESULTS

In the group receiving ketamine 8 mg kg(-1), the children were significantly calmer than those of the other groups, and anaesthesia induction was more comfortable. Recovery from anaesthesia was longer in the group receiving ketamine 8 mg kg(-1) compared with the other groups, but no differences between the groups were observed after 2 h in the recovery room.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that oral ketamine 8 mg kg(-1) is an effective oral premedication in inpatient children undergoing elective surgery.

Trendelenburg positioning after cardiac surgery: effects on intrathoracic blood volume index and cardiac performance

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of the Trendelenburg position, a common first step to treat suspected hypovolaemia, remains controversial. We evaluated its haemodynamic effects on cardiac preload and performance in patients after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Twelve patients undergoing mechanical ventilation of the lungs who demonstrated left ventricular 'kissing papillary muscles' by transoesophageal echocardiography, thus suggesting hypovolaemia, were positioned 30 degrees head down for 15 min immediately after cardiac surgery. Cardiac output by thermodilution, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, left ventricular end-diastolic area by transoesophageal echocardiography and intrathoracic blood volume by thermo- and dye dilution were determined before, during and after this Trendelenburg manoeuvre.

RESULTS

Trendelenburg's manoeuvre was associated with increases in central venous pressure (9 +/- 2 to 12 +/- 3 mmHg) and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (8 +/- 2 to 11 +/- 3 mmHg). The intrathoracic blood volume index increased slightly (dye dilution from 836 +/- 129 to 872 +/- 112 mL m(-2); thermodilution from 823 +/- 129 to 850 +/- 131 mL m(-2)) as did the left ventricular end-diastolic area index (7.5 +/- 2.1 to 8.1 +/- 1.7 cm2 m(-2)), whereas mean arterial pressure and the cardiac index did not change significantly. After supine repositioning, the cardiac index decreased significantly below baseline (3.0 +/- 0.6 versus 3.5 +/- 0.8 L min(-1) m(-2)) as did mean arterial pressure (76 +/- 12 versus 85 +/- 11 mmHg), central venous pressure (8 +/- 2 mmHg) and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (6 +/- 4 mmHg). The intrathoracic blood volume index and left ventricular end-diastolic area index did not differ significantly from baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Trendelenburg's manoeuvre caused only a slight increase of preload volume, despite marked increases in cardiac-filling pressures, without significantly improving cardiac performance.

Anaesthetic and haemodynamic effects of continuous spinal versus continuous epidural anaesthesia with prilocaine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To compare, using prilocaine, the effects of continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) and continuous epidural anaesthesia (CEA) on haemodynamic stability as well as the quality of anaesthesia and recovery in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate gland.

METHODS

Thirty patients (>60 yr) were randomized into two groups. Prilocaine, 2% 40 mg, was given to patients in the CSA group, and prilocaine 1% 150mg was given to patients in the CEA group. Incremental doses were given if the level of sensory block was lower than T10 or if needed during surgery.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure in Group CEA compared with Group CSA (P < 0.01). The decrease in heart rate in Group CSA occurred 10 min after the first local anaesthetic administration and continued through the operation (P < 0.05). The level of sensory anaesthesia was similar in both groups. The times to reach the level of T10 and the upper level of sensory blockade (Tmax) were 18.0 +/- 4.7 and 25.3 +/- 7.0 min in Groups CSA and CEA, respectively, and were significantly longer in Group CEA. The duration of anaesthesia was 76.8 +/- 4min and was shorter in Group CSA (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal or epidural anaesthesia administered continuously was reliable in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. Continuous spinal anaesthesia had a more rapid onset of action, produced more effective sensory and motor blockade and had a shorter recovery period. Prilocaine appeared to be a safe local anaesthetic for use with either continuous spinal anaesthesia or continuous epidural anaesthesia.

Cortical activity assessed by Narcotrend in relation to haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation at different stages of cortical suppression and reflex control

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Many anaesthesiologists still interpret haemodynamic responses as signs of insufficient cortical suppression. The aim was to illustrate how haemodynamics may only poorly reflect the level of cortical suppression and that electroencephalographic monitoring could indicate different relationships between cortical effects and haemodynamics.

METHODS

Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental (7 mg kg(-1)), and fentanyl (2 microg kg(-1)) with succinylcholine (1.5 mg kg(-1)) for neuromuscular blockade in the 11 patients of Group 1. In Group 2 (n = 15), thiopental (7 mg kg(-1)) and succinylcholine (1.5 mg kg(-1)) were given. In Group 3, the patients (n = 13) received thiopental (7 mg kg(-1)), fentanyl (2 microg kg(-1)) and cisatracurium (0.1 mg kg(-1)), and they were intubated 3 min later than the patients in Groups 1 and 2. We determined conventional electroencephalographic (EEG) variables and classified 14 EEG stages in real-time ranging from A (= 1), indicating full wakefulness, to F1 (= 14), at profound cortical suppression.

RESULTS

All groups had profound cortical suppression 45 s after thiopental administration, which rapidly decreased (EEG stage, 11 (6-13) versus 7 (2-13) at 4 min, P < 0.0001). Decreasing EEG stages were associated with increasing SEF 95, relative alpha and beta power and decreasing relative delta power. During tracheal intubation, profound cortical suppression remained unchanged in Groups 1 and 2. In Group 3, cortical suppression had decreased before laryngoscopy (P < 0.005). In Group 2, 11 patients had heart rate responses to tracheal intubation, whereas only two responded in Group 1 (P = 0.015) and three in Group 3 (P = 0.02). Thirteen patients in Group 2 had arterial pressure responses, and five in Group 1 (P = 0.038). Circulatory responses did not differ between Groups 1 and 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Electroencephalographic monitoring was suitable to indicate in real-time that haemodynamics only poorly reflect rapidly changing levels of cortical suppression, and how haemodynamics and cortical activity depend on the applied combination of hypnotic and analgesic drugs during anaesthesia induction with thiopental.

Increasing the injection volume by dilution improves the onset of motor blockade, but not sensory blockade of ropivacaine for brachial plexus block

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ropivacaine used for axillary plexus block provides effective motor and sensory blockade. Varying clinical dosage recommendations exist. Increasing the dosage by increasing the concentration showed no improvement in onset. We compared the behaviour of a constant dose of ropivacaine 150 mg diluted in a 30, 40 or 60 mL injection volume for axillary (brachial) plexus block.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study on patients undergoing elective hand surgery was conducted in a community hospital. Three groups of patients with a constant dose of ropivacaine 150 mg, diluted in 30,40 or 60 mL NaCl 0.9%, for axillary plexus blockade were compared for onset times of motor and sensory block onset by assessing muscle strength, two-point discrimination and constant-touch sensation.

RESULTS

Increasing the injection volume of ropivacaine 150 mg to 60 mL led to a faster onset of motor block, but not of sensory block, in axillary plexus block, compared with 30 or 40 mL volumes of injection.

CONCLUSIONS

The data show that the onset of motor, but not of sensory block, is accelerated by increasing the injection volume to 60 mL using ropivacaine 150 mg for axillary plexus block. This may be useful for a more rapid determination of whether the brachial plexus block is effective. However, when performing surgery in the area of the block, sensory block onset seems more important.

Recovery of psychomotor function after propofol sedation is prolonged in the elderly

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of age on recovery of psychomotor function for propofol sedation during spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

Propofol was continuously infused during surgery and spinal anesthesia in 15 elderly patients (65-85 yr-old) and 15 younger patients (20-50 yr-old). Infusion rates were adjusted to maintain an appropriate level of sedation using the bispectral index (range 60-70). The sedative infusion was discontinued at the end of surgery. The early recovery times from the end of propofol infusion to opening of eyes on command, sustaining a hand grip, and recall of name were noted. Psychomotor function, as measured by the Trieger's dot test, was evaluated before anesthesia and 30, 60, 90, 120 min after the end of propofol infusion.

RESULTS

The duration of anesthesia was 142 +/- 55 min and 134 +/- 61 min in the elderly and younger patients, respectively. No differences were observed in early recovery times between elderly and younger patients (opened their eyes on command, 6.3 +/- 4.0 min and 5.2 +/- 2.6 min; sustained a hand grip, 7.2 +/- 3.9 min and 6.1 +/- 3.5 min and recalled their name, 8.0 +/- 4.5 min and 6.5 +/- 3.8 min, P > 0.05 ). The recovery of psychomotor function in the elderly took longer compared with the younger patients, and psychomotor function in the elderly recovered at 120 min after the end of propofol infusion.

CONCLUSION

Early recovery times following propofol sedation is similar between elderly and younger patients, but recovery of psychomotor function in the elderly is delayed compared with younger patients.

[Evaluation of cognitive functions after anesthesia with propofol]

OBJECTIVES

To assess the disturbances and delay of recovery of cognitive functions following propofol anaesthesia, and to evaluate a series of simple cognitive recovery tests.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective comparative non randomized clinical study.

PATIENTS

Two groups of non premedicated patients, of ASA physical class 1 and 2 were studied. The control group (n = 11) included patients undergoing gastric fibroscopy under local anaesthesia. The propofol group (n = 22) consisted of patients scheduled for coloscopy under propofol anaesthesia.

METHODS

The gastric fibroscopy was performed under local anaesthesia with lidocaine and the coloscopy under general anaesthesia with propofol as the sole anaesthetic. Five cognitive tests, designed to assess short-term memory, delayed memory, the ability to plan complex tasks, attention, and language comprehension were conducted the day before, and 1 hour, 3 hours and 6 hours after the endoscopy.

RESULTS

The cognitive functions remained significantly depressed for at least 3 hours after anaesthesia, and recovered fully about 6 hours after the cessation of propofol administration. The capacity for planning was the most heavily affected.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete recovery can be evaluated by simple cognitive tests, which showed that cognitive functions are impaired over a longer period than psychomotor functions. Oral instructions may therefore not be fully understood by the patient within 3 hours after anaesthesia, emphasizing the importance of written instructions and the essential role played by a well-informed accompanying person.

Anaesthesia for videoarthroscopy of the knee. A comparison between desflurane and sevoflurane

BACKGROUND

The newer inhalational agents desflurane and sevoflurane have a low blood-gas partition coefficient and are not very fat soluble, and consequently recovery is rapid and smooth. Very few studies have been published concerning adults where a direct comparison has been made between sevoflurane and desflurane in the ambulatory setting.

METHODS

This study was done to assess aspects of recovery following minor ambulatory videoarthroscopic knee surgery in 50 ASA I-II patients. Baseline values were obtained on the following psychomotor tests: digit symbol substitution test (DSST), perceptive accuracy test (PAT) and simple reaction time (SRT). The patients were then randomly allocated to one of two groups according to an open (unblinded) study design: Group D (Desflurane) were maintained on desflurane while Group S (Sevoflurane) were maintained on sevoflurane. Propofol was used as the induction agent in all patients and the larynx mask was used to maintain a free airway. Oxygen and air (FiO2 0.33) were used as the carrier gases. The concentration of desflurane or sevoflurane was adjusted in order to maintain adequate anaesthesia and stable haemodynamics. Alfentanil was given at induction and every 15 min as an analgesic. At the end of the operation, the gases were turned off abruptly and 100% oxygen was delivered at 6 L/min until eye-opening. Early recovery was measured by the time to eye-opening, giving name and date of birth. Intermediate recovery was measured by psychomotor testing every 30 min, and the time to sitting up in bed, drinking fluids and discharge home by a nurse who was blinded to the anaesthetic technique.

RESULTS

Early recovery was quicker in the desflurane compared to the sevoflurane group (P<0.001). Psychomotor recovery as measured by the PAT occurred significantly earlier in the desflurane compared to the sevoflurane group at 15 and 45 min (P<0.001) and as measured by the DSST at 30 min (P<0.05). The number of patients who could not perform the SRT test at 15 min was greater in the sevoflurane compared to the desflurane group (13 vs 0) (P<0.01). No differences were found in other recovery parameters, including home discharge, between the groups. The incidence of pain and other minor postoperative complications was similar between the groups except for sore throat which was higher in the desflurane group.

CONCLUSION

Early and intermediate (psychomotor) recovery is quicker in the desflurane compared to the sevoflurane group, but there is no difference in discharge times between the groups.

Recovery and outcome after propofol and isoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) is expected to provide fast and comfortable recovery, plus an early return to normal daily activities. This study was carried out to compare the outcome after LH in patients anesthetized with isoflurane or propofol.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients undergoing LH were randomized to receive either isoflurane-N2O or propofol-N2O anesthesia. The times when the patients could drink, void and walk were recorded. Recovery was also evaluated by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) 60 and 120 min after the operation. The patients were also given a questionnaire on their further recovery (return to daily activities, pain and nausea) to be filled out at home.

RESULTS

Early recovery was significantly (P < 0.05) faster in the isoflurane group (eye opening within 3 min, orientation in 6 min) when compared to the propofol group (eye opening within 7 min, orientation in 14 min), but there was no significant difference in the other parameters of recovery. Most of the patients were discharged from the hospital on the first postoperative day in both groups. Twenty-five percent of the patients, however, stayed two nights in hospital, mainly for social reasons. No difference was found regarding the recovery at home: the patients resumed their normal daily activities on about the sixth postoperative day (median).

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that both isoflurane and propofol are suitable anesthetics for LH. In this study recovery was not fast enough to make the patients suitable for same-day surgery.

The effects of midazolam and flumazenil on psychomotor function

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of midazolam and its antagonism with flumazenil on psychomotor function as assessed by the perceptive accuracy test (PAT) and choice reaction time (CRT).

DESIGN

Double-blind, cross-over, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.

SUBJECTS

11 healthy volunteers (6 females, 5 males, mean age 32 years).

INTERVENTIONS

Midazolam 0.1 mg/kg (Group MH), midazolam 0.035 mg/kg (Group ML), or placebo (Group PL) were injected intravenously (IV) in a cross-over design. Flumazenil 0.5 mg was injected after 60 minutes. Plasma concentrations of midazolam were measured at 3, 30, 60 and 75 minutes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Baseline values were first obtained on psychomotor tests including the PAT and CRT. These tests were then repeated 30 and 60 minutes after the IV injection of midazolam or placebo, and repeated 15 and 30 minutes following the injection of flumazenil. A dose-dependent effect of midazolam was seen on the PAT and CRT. Flumazenil completely reversed the psychomotor effects of midazolam in Group ML at 60 minutes but not in Group MH, and this action was clearly detected by the PAT. Psychomotor tests had returned to baseline values when the plasma concentration of midazolam was below 33 ng/ml. A marked inter-individual variation was seen on the PAT, CRT, and in the correlation between the plasma concentration and the results on the PAT.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a dose-dependent deterioration in psychomotor performance in subjects given midazolam. The PAT was sensitive in the detection of these residual effects, but a large inter-individual variation in the psychomotor effects of midazolam was evident that could be due to pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic variability between individuals. Flumazenil in a dose of 0.5 mg IV completely reversed the effects of low-dose, but not high-dose, midazolam.

Anaesthesia for day-care arthroscopy. A comparison between desflurane and isoflurane

A study was undertaken to compare desflurane- and isoflurane-based anaesthesia in patients undergoing day-care arthroscopic surgery. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2-3 mg.kg-1 and a laryngeal mask airway was inserted after loss of the eyelash reflex. Patients were then randomly divided into two groups to receive maintenance anaesthesia with either isoflurane or desflurane delivered in oxygen and nitrous oxide. Alfentanil was used as the analgesic during the operation. Early recovery was assessed by measurement of the times to eye opening, extubation and ability to give a date of birth. Psychomotor recovery was assessed by performance on the finger tapping and perceptive accuracy tests. Mood was evaluated using visual analogue mood scores and the mood adjective checklist. Discharge times were also measured. Early recovery was significantly quicker following desflurane anaesthesia but no differences between the groups were found in psychomotor tests. The mood adjective checklist showed that patients in the isoflurane group had a greater total mood score and were more calm than those in the desflurane group; this was particularly evident 2 h after anaesthesia. The discharge times were similar for the two groups. Desflurane is a satisfactory alternative to isoflurane for day care anaesthesia.

Assessment of recovery following day-case arthroscopy. A comparison between propofol and isoflurane-based anaesthesia

Fifty healthy patients, aged 15-45 years, undergoing day-case arthroscopy, participated in a study to assess aspects of recovery and mood. Psychomotor tests, including the p-deletion test and the Trieger dot test, were performed pre-operatively and mood was measured using the mood adjective checklist. Anaesthesia in all patients was induced with propofol and a laryngeal mask airway was inserted immediately. All patients received alfentanil as the intra-operative analgesic. The patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two different regimens for maintenance of anaesthesia: propofol group--maintenance with an infusion of propofol 10 mg.kg-1.h-1 for 15 min followed by 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 and nitrous oxide and oxygen (bolus doses of propofol were given if anaesthesia was deemed to be light); isoflurane group--maintenance with isoflurane (inspired concentration 0.5-2.0%) in nitrous oxide and oxygen. Postoperatively, psychomotor tests were repeated every 30 min and mood was measured after 2 h and 24 h. Psychomotor recovery was quicker in the isoflurane group than the propofol group and had returned to baseline values in the isoflurane group by 60 min. The time to discharge was similar in both groups as was the incidence of side effects. There was no difference in mood scores between the groups either at the time of discharge or at 24 h. We conclude that psychomotor recovery is somewhat quicker when isoflurane-based anaesthesia is used for day-case arthroscopy, but other factors, including time to awakening, mood and time to discharge are similar for both techniques.

Postural control after propofol anaesthesia in minor surgery

There is, not only from an economic perspective, a continuous search for surgical and anaesthetic procedures that allow out-patient surgery to be conducted. Reliable estimators of the patient's street fitness are of the utmost importance. Balancing capacity is one aspect that should be considered. Clinical methods like Romberg's are subjective and imprecise. Dynamic posturography comprises a movable support surface and visual surround that are either stable or referenced to the patient's sway, with eyes open or closed. In this study the recovery from propofol anaesthesia was studied in 8 patients who underwent surgery for minor microlaryngoscopic procedures. Dynamic posturography who performed before, and 2 and 4 h after cessation of anaesthesia. All patients who were awake had normal balancing ability already at 2 h after anaesthesia. Further studies may supply additional information of other aspects of discharge after anaesthesia.

Alfentanil or fentanyl during isoflurane-based anaesthesia for day-care knee arthroscopy?

Forty patients agreed to participate in a study to compare whether fentanyl or alfentanil used as analgesic is associated with quicker recovery following anaesthesia for outpatient arthroscopy procedure. Psychomotor tests including choice reaction time (CRT), perceptive accuracy test (PAT) and finger tapping test (FTT) were done prior to induction of anaesthesia with propofol (2-3 mg.kg-1). Patients were then divided into two groups: Group F (fentanyl) received 0.1 mg fentanyl prior to start of surgery and thereafter 0.05 mg every 30 min during the procedure. Group A (alfentanil) received 0.5 mg alfentanil prior to the onset of surgery and 0.25 mg every 15 min thereafter. Anaesthesia was then maintained using isoflurane (0.5-2%) in oxygen and air (FiO2 0.33) during spontaneous respiration with a face mask in a Bain's system. Psychomotor tests were repeated every 45 min postoperatively. Clinical recovery, visual analogue pain intensity score (VAS) and time to discharge home were also assessed by a nurse blind to the method used. Patients in Group A returned to baseline values on the FTT after 90 min while those in Group F did not return to baseline values until 135 min after the end of the operation. Clinical recovery and time to discharge home ("home ready") were also significantly longer in Group F. There was no difference in recovery as seen in the PAT and CRT between the groups. Also, there was no difference in the incidence of side effects and the pain intensity (VAS) scores were similar in the two groups at all time periods.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Postoperative nausea and vomiting. A comparison between intravenous and inhalation anaesthesia in breast surgery

Nausea and vomiting during the first 24 postoperative hours after breast surgery were studied. Ninety patients scheduled for elective breast surgery were randomly assigned to one of three anaesthetic methods: total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol, or propofol or thiopental for induction followed by isoflurane anaesthesia. All three groups received fentanyl for peroperative analgesia. A total of 46 (51%) patients experienced emetic sequelae: 19 (21%) complained about nausea and another 27 (30%) vomited once or more during the postoperative course. More than 50% of the patients with nausea and 70% with vomiting first suffered from these symptoms in the surgical wards after leaving the postoperative unit. Nausea and vomiting were seen in 18 (60%), 13 (43%) and 15 (50%) for the groups propofol-propofol, propofol-isoflurane and thiopental-isoflurane, respectively. In conclusion, every second patient experienced nausea or vomiting after breast surgery, the majority of these emetic symptoms occurring after leaving the postoperative unit. Propofol for induction or as a main anaesthetic did not make any major difference with regard to postoperative nausea or vomiting.

Nausea: the most important factor determining length of stay after ambulatory anaesthesia. A comparative study of isoflurane and/or propofol techniques

Speed of recovery and length of stay in hospital were studied in 95 ambulatory patients undergoing laparoscopy or arthroscopy. The patients were divided into three groups regarding maintenance of anaesthesia. Group A (n = 32) received isoflurane 0.7% end-tidally, group B (n = 31) propofol infusion for 25 min and thereafter isoflurane, and group C (n = 32) received an infusion of propofol throughout the procedure. Recovery was assessed by a combination of the Maddox-Wing, the Choice Reaction Time test and p-deletion. The awakening period was somewhat shorter in group A, but psychomotor recovery was somewhat slower compared to groups B and C. The length of stay in hospital depended on whether the patient was nauseated or not. In group A, 44% suffered from nausea requiring medical intervention compared to 13% and 19% in groups B and C, respectively. The stay in hospital was 235 +/- 90 min (mean +/- standard deviation) in group A compared to 184 +/- 56 min and 197 +/- 55 min in groups B and C, respectively. The non-nauseated patients in group A had a stay in hospital of 188 +/- 55 min compared to 184 +/- 52 and 184 +/- 37 in the non-nauseated patients in groups B and C, respectively. In total, the nauseated patients (n = 24) stayed 267 +/- 95 min compared to 185 +/- 47 min for the non-nauseated patients (n = 71), P < 0.001. We found nausea to be the most important factor determining length of stay after ambulatory anaesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Randomized perturbed posturography: methodology and effects of midazolam sedation

To study quiescent stance without applying external disturbances is not a theoretically appealing way to unveil the dynamic properties of human equilibrium. Methods to disturb equilibrium range from standing on foam surface, attaching vibrators to the calves to interfere with somatosensation, and exposure to body-position tracking environments, as in dynamic posturography (EquiTest). The EquiTest apparatus was modified by a menu-driven software to allow arbitrary movements of the support surface and visual surround, and force data were recorded for subsequent analysis. The support surface was randomly moved in the antero-posterior direction. First equilibrium was studied on the stable support surface, then low (RMS 1.3 cm) and high (RMS 2.6 cm) amplitude movements were used. Vision was either present or absent at all test amplitudes. Equilibrium was evaluated by the confidence (61%) ellipse sway area and average sway velocity during 45 s. Eleven healthy subjects aged 23-36 years (mean 29) were sedated with a short acting sedative, midazolam 0.1 mg/kg. Randomized perturbed posturography was conducted at baseline, and at about 60, 120 and 180 min after injection. Psychomotor tests were conducted at baseline, and at 30, 90, 150 and 210 min. Large interindividual variations were found. One subject could not be tested at all at 60 min due to sleepiness, whereas some subjects felt nearly full awake at 30 min. Sway areas were larger at 60 min, but not subsequently. At 60 min, sway velocities with open eyes were higher, just as when vision was absent and low amplitude movements were used. Later no effects could be shown.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Thiopentone or propofol for induction of isoflurane-based anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery?

This study compares psychomotor recovery following induction of anaesthesia with either thiopentone or propofol in 30 healthy, unpremedicated patients undergoing outpatient arthroscopic procedures of the knee. A battery of tests including simple reaction time (SRT), choice reaction time (CRT), perceptive accuracy test (PAT) and digit symbol substitution test (DSST) were done before anaesthesia. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1 was induced with thiopentone 5-6 mg/kg while Group 2 was induced with propofol 2-3 mg/kg. Anaesthesia was then maintained with isoflurane (0.5-2%) in oxygen and air, and supplements of alfentanil were given for analgesia during spontaneous respiration with a face mask. Psychomotor recovery assessed every 30 min postoperatively for 120 min showed that patients in Group 1 had not returned to baseline values until 120 min after the operation on the PAT, while those in Group 2 had returned to baseline values at 60 min. No patient had any significant side effects. The SRT, CRT and DSST proved to be relatively insensitive in the detection of residual effects of anaesthesia and had a significant learning effect. This study suggests that induction of anaesthesia with propofol followed by maintenance with isoflurane in oxygen and air during spontaneous ventilation is associated with rapid psychomotor recovery and is a suitable method for ambulatory surgery. The PAT is sensitive and not associated with some of the problems found with other commonly used tests.