Association between central venous pressure and blood loss during hepatic resection in 984 living donors

Extracorporeal life support in trauma: Indications and techniques

BACKGROUND

Clarity about indications and techniques in extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in trauma is essential for timely and effective deployment, and to ensure good stewardship of an important resource. Extracorporeal life support deployments in a tertiary trauma center were reviewed to understand the indications, strategies, and tactics of ECLS in trauma.

METHODS

The provincial trauma registry was used to identify patients who received ECLS at a Level I trauma center and ECLS organization-accredited site between January 2014 and February 2021. Charts were reviewed for indications, technical factors, and outcomes following ECLS deployment. Based on this data, consensus around indications and techniques for ECLS in trauma was reached and refined by a multidisciplinary team discussion.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients underwent ECLS as part of a comprehensive trauma resuscitation strategy. Eighteen patients underwent venovenous ECLS and seven received venoarterial ECLS. Nineteen patients survived the ECLS run, of which 15 survived to discharge. Four patients developed vascular injuries secondary to cannula insertion while four patients developed circuit clots. On multidisciplinary consensus, three broad indications for ECLS and their respective techniques were described: gas exchange for lung injury, extended damage control for severe injuries associated with the lethal triad, and circulatory support for cardiogenic shock or hypothermia.

CONCLUSION

The three broad indications for ECLS in trauma (gas exchange, extended damage control and circulatory support) require specific advanced planning and standardization of corresponding techniques (cannulation, circuit configuration, anticoagulation, and duration). When appropriately and effectively integrated into the trauma response, ECLS can extend the damage control paradigm to enable the management of complex multisystem injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Application of cardiovascular interventions to decrease blood loss during hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Perioperative bleeding and allogeneic blood transfusion are generally thought to affect the outcomes of patients. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the benefits and risks of several cardiovascular interventions in patients undergoing hepatectomy.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, and Web of Science to February 02, 2023. RCTs focused on cardiovascular interventions aimed at reducing blood loss or blood transfusion requirements during hepatectomy were included. The primary outcomes were perioperative blood loss amount, number of patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusion and overall occurrence of postoperative complications. The secondary outcomes were operating time, perioperative mortality rate, postoperative liver and kidney function and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Seventeen RCTs were included in the analysis. A total of 841 patients who underwent hepatectomy in 10 trials were included in the comparative analysis between low central venous pressure (CVP) and control groups. The forest plots showed a low operative bleeding volume [(mean difference (MD): -409.75 mL, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -616.56 to -202.94, P < 0.001], reduced blood transfusion rate [risk ratio (RR): 0.47, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.65, P < 0.001], shortened operating time (MD: -13.42 min, 95% CI -22.59 to -4.26, P = 0.004), and fewer postoperative complications (RR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.99, P = 0.04) in the low CVP group than in the control group. Five and two trials compared the following interventions, respectively: 'acute normovolaemic haemodilution (ANH) vs control' and 'autologous blood donation vs control'. ANH and autologous blood donation could not reduce the blood loss amount but greatly decreased the number of patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusion. No benefits were found in the rate of mortality and length of postoperative hospital stay in any of the comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Lowering the CVP seems to be effective and safe in adult patients undergoing hepatectomy. ANH and autologous blood donation should be used as a part of blood management for suitable patients in certain circumstances.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42022314061.

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Preoperative Volemia Assessment in Living Donor Hepatectomy

Donor safety remains an important concern. We introduced preoperative bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in living donor hepatectomy, as it is a practical method for volemia assessment with the advantages of noninvasiveness, rapid processing, easy handling, and it is relatively inexpensive. We analyzed 51 living donors who underwent right hemihepatectomy between July 2015 and May 2022. The ratio of extracellular water:total body water (ECW/TBW; an index of volemic status) was measured. ECT/TBW < 0.378 was correlated to central venous pressure (CVP) < 5 mm Hg in a previous study and we used this value for personalized preoperative management. In the BIA group (n = 21), donors with ECW/TBW ≥ 0.378 (n = 12) required whole-day nothing by mouth (NPO), whereas those with ECW/TBW < 0.378 (n = 9) required midnight NPO, similar to the control group (n = 30). In comparison with the control group, the BIA group had a significantly lower central venous pressure (p < 0.001) from the start of surgery to the end of surgery, leading to a better surgical field grade (p = 0.045) and decreased operative duration (240.5 ± 45.6 vs. 276.5 ± 54.0 min, p = 0.016). A cleaner surgical field (surgical field grade 1) was significantly associated with decreased operative duration (p = 0.001) and estimated blood loss (p < 0.001). Preoperative BIA was the only significant predictor of a cleaner surgical field (odds ratio, 6.914; 95% confidence interval, 1.6985−28.191, p = 0.007). In conclusion, preoperative volemia assessment using BIA can improve operative outcomes by creating a favorable surgical environment in living donor hepatectomy.

Reducing Risk for Acute Kidney Injury After Living Donor Hepatectomy by Protocolized Fluid Restriction: Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a potential complication after restricted fluid therapy for major surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of AKI for living liver donor hepatectomy in which applied intraoperative protocolized fluid restriction was used targeting a low central venous pressure (CVP) level with high pulse pressure variation (PPV) and systolic pressure variation (SPV).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Living liver donors were admitted for this retrospective observational study. Low CVP <5 mm Hg with high PPV<20% and SPV<15% were the targets of the clinical protocol to reduce intraoperative blood loss via protocolized fluid management until the end of the hepatic parenchymal division. KDIGO criteria were used for AKI definition. The SPSS version 11.5 program was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 130 patients, 79 (60.8%) men and 51 (39.2%) women, with from 18 to 58 years of age. Donors underwent right and left lobe hepatectomies (116 and 14, respectively). The baseline CVP, the lowest CVP of hepatectomy, and the highest CVP measured after hepatectomy were 7.45 ± 2.41, 4.28 ± 1.12, 7.67 ± 2.09 mm Hg, respectively. Only 4 patients with right lobe hepatectomy developed AKI stage I (3.1%) in the first 24 hours. The 4 patients were recovered at 48 hours postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that a CVP target of <5 mm Hg and high PPV/SPV via a simple fluid management modality with protocolized-fluid restriction until the procurement may not cause AKI in living liver donors in a closed follow-up anesthesia approach.

Preoperative volume assessment using bioelectrical impedance analysis for minimizing blood loss during hepatic resection

BACKGROUND

Maintaining low central venous pressure (CVP) is an effective strategy to reduce blood loss during hepatic resection. As an alternative to measuring CVP, which requires the placement of a central venous catheter, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a noninvasive method recently used for monitoring volume status in critically ill patients.

METHODS

We investigated 192 patients who underwent hepatic resection from January 2017 to December 2020. The ratio of extracellular water:total body water (ECW/TBW), as an index of volume status, was measured using InBody S10 (Biospace, Seoul, Korea). The correlation between the ECW/TBW and CVP was determined, and their influences on operative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

ECW/TBW and CVP showed a significant correlation; an ECW/TBW <0.378 correlated with a CVP <5 mmHg (R2 = 0.839, P<0.001). Estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly increased in patients with an ECW/TBW ≥0.378 compared to those with a ratio <0.378 (508 ± 321 vs. 324 ± 193, mL, P<0.001). Identified predictors for an EBL ≥500 mL were operative time (odds ratio [OR], 1.008; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.001-1.015; P = 0.021) and an ECW/TBW <0.378 (OR, 0.263; 95% CI, 0.121-0.572; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

BIA can be utilized for preoperative volume assessment to minimize blood loss during hepatic resection.

Infrahepatic Inferior Vena Cava Clamping does not Increase the Risk of Pulmonary Embolism Following Hepatic Resection

BACKGROUND

Infrahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) clamping reduces central venous pressure. However, controversies remain regarding its impact on postoperative complications, particularly, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim of the study was to determine the impact of IVC clamping on the incidence of PE in patients undergoing hepatectomy.

METHODS

A pooled analysis of five prospective trials on patients who underwent hepatic resection over a period of 10 years was performed. Patients with infrahepatic IVC clamping were compared to patients without infrahepatic IVC clamping. Outcomes were studied by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of 505 included patients, 141 patients had IVC clamping and 364 patients served as control group. The rate of postoperative PE was comparable between groups (3% vs. 3%; P = 0.762), as were postoperative morbidity (P = 0.932), bile leakage (P = 0.272), posthepatectomy hemorrhage (P = 0.095), and posthepatectomy liver failure (P = 0.605), respectively. No clinicopathological and intraoperative risk factors were found to predict the onset of PE. Subgroup analyses of patients with major hepatectomy and vascular resections confirmed no adverse perioperative outcomes to be associated with IVC clamping.

CONCLUSIONS

Infrahepatic IVC clamping does not increase the incidence of postoperative PE.

The effect of low central venous pressure on hepatic surgical field bleeding and serum lactate in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

This prospective randomized controlled study was designed to evaluate the effect of fluid restriction alone versus fluid restriction + low central venous pressure (CVP) on hepatic surgical field bleeding, intraoperative blood loss, and the serum lactate concentration in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy.

Methods

One hundred forty patients undergoing partial hepatectomy with intraoperative portal triad clamping were randomized into a fluid restriction group (Group F) or fluid restriction + low CVP group (Group L). Both groups received limited fluid infusion before the liver lesions were removed. Ephedrine was administered if the systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased to <90 mmHg for 1 min. When the urine output was <20 ml/h or the SBP was <90 mmHg for 1 min more than three times, an additional 200 ml of crystalline solution was quickly infused within 10 min. In addition to fluid restriction, patients in Group L received continuous nitroglycerin and esmolol infusion to maintain a low CVP. The duration of portal triad clamping, frequency of additional fluid infusion, frequency of ephedrine administration, intraoperative blood loss, extent of liver resection, and bleeding score of the hepatic surgical field were recorded. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed before anesthesia (T1), after liver dissection and immediately before liver resection (T2), 10 min after removal of the liver lesion (T3), and before the patient was discharged from the postanesthesia care unit (T4).

Results

Being in the fluid restriction Group (Group F) (odds ratio = 5.04) and cirrhosis (odds ratio = 3.28) were risk factors for hepatic surgical field bleeding. Factors contributing to intraoperative blood loss were the operation time, duration of portal triad clamping, and extent of resection. No significant between-group difference was observed for blood loss or blood transfusion. The serum lactate concentration peaked at T3 in both groups.

Conclusions

Maintaining a lower CVP during hepatectomy provides an optimal surgical field but has no significant effect on intraoperative blood loss. Moreover, lower CVP does not increase the serum lactate concentration.

Trial registration

“A comparative study of the effect fluid restriction and low CVP pressure on the oozing of blood in liver wounds and blood lactate in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy” was prospectively registered as a trial (registration number: ChiCTR-INR-17014172, date of registration: 27 December 2017).

Improved hemostasis with major hepatic resection in the current surgical era

BACKGROUND

Major hepatic resection, predominantly performed for oncologic intent, is a complex procedure with the potential for severe intraoperative hemorrhage. The current surgical era has the ability to improve hemostasis throughout the performance of major hepatic resections which decreases blood transfusions and the detrimental effects associated with transfusion. We evaluated hemostasis and outcomes in the current surgical era of performing hepatic resections.

METHODS

Utilizing the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database all major hepatic resections performed between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed in regards to hemostasis. Hemostasis was evaluated by the need for and magnitude of blood transfusions. Additional perioperative variables (including operative time, length of hospital stay, and mortality rates) were analyzed to assess for outcomes with hemostasis. The NSQIP results were compared to previous publications involving major hepatic resections to detect improvement in hemostasis and outcomes in the current surgical era.

RESULTS

A total of 22777 major hepatic resections met the inclusion criteria for analysis in the NSQIP database. An additional 21198 cases were compiled within the selected publications for comparative analysis. The transfusion rate in the current surgical era was 13.3% versus 38.7% in the previous era (P = 0.0001). When a transfusion was required in the current surgical era there was a two-fold reduction in the number of units transfused (1.5 U vs. 3.8 U, P = 0.0001). Statistically significant improvements in operative time and length of hospital stay were presented within the current surgical era (P = 0.0001). When a transfusion was required there was an increased relative risk score of 7 for mortality (4.9% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.0001), however, improvement in mortality rates did not reach statistical significance across surgical eras (1.3% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The conduction of major hepatic resection in the current surgical era is more hemostatic. Correlated with improved hemostasis are better outcomes for both clinical and financial endpoints. These findings should encourage continued and increased performance of major hepatic resections.

Survival analysis of intraoperative blood salvage for patients with malignancy disease: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative blood salvage as a blood-saving strategy has been widely used in surgery. Considering its theoretic risk of malignant tumor cells being reinfused and the corresponding blood metastases, the safety of intraoperative blood salvage in cancer surgery remains controversial.

METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), we searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE to November 2017. We included only studies comparing intraoperative blood salvage with allogeneic blood transfusion.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 9 studies with 4354 patients with 1346 patients in the intraoperative blood salvage group and 3008 patients in the allogeneic blood transfusion group. There were no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival outcome (odds ratio [OR] 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.58), 5-year disease-free survival outcome (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.86-1.35), or 5-year recurrence rate (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.71-1.05) between the 2 study groups. Subgroup analysis also showed no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival outcome (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.57-1.67) of hepatocellular carcinoma patients in liver transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with malignant disease, intraoperative blood salvage did not increase the tumor recurrence rate and had comparable survival outcomes with allogeneic blood transfusion.

Population-based volume kinetics of Ringer's lactate solution in patients undergoing open gastrectomy

In order to maintain stable blood pressure and heart rate during surgery, anesthesiologists need to administer the appropriate amount of fluid with appropriate fluid type to the patient, then quantifying how fluid is distributed and eliminated from the body is useful for establishing a fluid administration strategy. In this study we characterized the volume kinetics of Ringer's lactate solution in patients undergoing open gastrectomy. When propofol and remifentanil reached a pseudosteady state at the target concentration and blood pressure was stabilized following surgical stimulation, enrolled patients were administered 1000 mL of Ringer's lactate solution for 20 min, followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 6 mL/kg/h until the time of the last blood collection for volume kinetic analysis. Arterial blood samples were collected to measure the hemoglobin concentration at different time points. The change in hemoglobin-derived plasma dilution induced by the administration of Ringer's lactate solution was evaluated by nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Three hundred and twenty-three plasma dilution data points from 27 patients were used to determine the pharmacokinetic characteristics of Ringer's lactate solution. A two-volume model best described the pharmacokinetics of Ringer's lactate solution. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and body weight (WT) were significant covariates for the elimination clearance (k_r) and central volume of distribution at baseline (V_c0), respectively. The parameter estimates were as follows: k_r (mL/min) = 124 + (MAP/70)^14.2, V_c0 (mL) = 0.95 + 3440 × (WT/63), V_t0 (mL) = 2730, and k_t (mL/min) = 181. A higher MAP was associated with a greater elimination clearance and, consequently, less water accumulation in the interstitium. As body weight increases, volume expansion in the blood vessels increases.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in liver resection: current concepts and controversies

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) attenuates the stress response to surgery in the perioperative period and hastens recovery. Liver resection is a complex surgical procedure where the enhanced recovery program has been shown to be safe and effective in terms of postoperative outcomes. ERAS programs have been shown to be associated with lower morbidity, shortened postoperative stay, and reduced cost with no difference in mortality and readmission rates. However, there are challenges that are unique to hepatic resection such as safety after epidural catheterization and postoperative coagulopathy, intraoperative fluids and postoperative organ dysfunction, need for low central venous pressure to reduce blood loss, and non-lactate containing intravenous fluids. This narrative review briefly discusses these concerns and controversies and suggests revisiting some of the strong recommendations made by the ERAS society in light of the recent evidence.

[Central venous pressure in liver surgery : A primary therapeutic goal or a hemodynamic tessera?]

Central venous pressure (CVP) is deemed to be an important parameter of anesthesia management in liver surgery. To reduce blood loss during liver resections, a low target value of CVP is often propagated. Although current meta-analyses have shown a connection between low CVP and a reduction in blood loss, the underlying studies show methodological weaknesses and advantages with respect to morbidity and mortality can hardly be proven. The measurement of the CVP itself is associated with numerous limitations and influencing factors and the measures to reduce the CVP have been insufficiently investigated with respect to hepatic hemodynamics. The definition of a generally valid target area for the CVP must be called into question. The primary objective is to maintain adequate oxygen supply and euvolemia. The CVP should be regarded as a mosaic stone of hemodynamic management.

The influence of PEEP and positioning on central venous pressure and venous hepatic hemodynamics in patients undergoing liver resection

PURPOSE

In order to assess the occurrence of blood congestion in the liver during liver resection, we aimed to evaluate the influence of a positive-end-expiratory-pressure (PEEP) and positioning of patients on central venous pressure (CVP) and venous hepatic blood flow parameters. We further analyzed correlations between CVP and venous hepatic blood flow parameters.

METHODS

In 20 patients scheduled for elective liver resection we measured CVP and quantified venous hepatic hemodynamics by ultrasound assessment of flow-velocity and diameter of the right hepatic vein and the portal vein after equilibration following these maneuvers: M1: 0° supine position, PEEP 0 cmH2O; M2: 0° supine position, PEEP 10 cmH2O; M3: 20° reverse-trendelenburg position; PEEP 10 cmH2O; M4: 20° reverse-trendelenburg position, PEEP 0cmH2O.

RESULTS

Changing from supine to reverse-trendelenburg position led to a significant decrease in CVP (M3 5.95 ± 2.06 vs. M1 7.35 ± 2.18 mmHg and M2 8.55 ± 1.79 mmHg). A PEEP of 10 cmH2O and reverse-trendelenburg position led to significant reduction of systolic (VsHV) and diastolic (VdHV) flow-velocities of the right hepatic vein (VsHV M3 19.96 ± 6.47 vs. M1 27.81 ± 11.03 cm s-1;VdHV M3 14.94 ± 6.22 vs. M1 20.15 ± 10.34 cm s-1 and M2 20.19 ± 13.19 cm s-1) whereas no significant changes of flow-velocity occurred in the portal vein. No correlations between CVP and diameters or flow-velocities of the right hepatic and the portal vein were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes of central venous pressure due to changes of PEEP and positioning were not correlated with changes of venous hepatic blood flow parameters as measured after equilibration. Strategies aiming for low central venous pressure cannot be supported by these results. However, before ruling out low-CVP-strategies during liver resections these results should be confirmed by further studies.

Perioperative fluid management in major hepatic resection: an integrative review

BACKGROUND

Fluid intervention and vasoactive pharmacological support during hepatic resection depend on the preference of the attending clinician, institutional resources, and practice culture. Evidence-based recommendations to guide perioperative fluid management are currently limited. Therefore, we provide a contemporary clinical integrative overview of the fundamental principles underpinning fluid intervention and hemodynamic optimization for adult patients undergoing major hepatic resection.

DATA SOURCES

A literature review was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials using the terms "surgery", "anesthesia", "starch", "hydroxyethyl starch derivatives", "albumin", "gelatin", "liver resection", "hepatic resection", "fluids", "fluid therapy", "crystalloid", "colloid", "saline", "plasma-Lyte", "plasmalyte", "hartmann's", "acetate", and "lactate". Search results for MEDLINE and EMBASE were additionally limited to studies on human populations that included adult age groups and publications in English.

RESULTS

A total of 113 articles were included after appropriate inclusion criteria screening. Perioperative fluid management as it relates to various anesthetic and surgical techniques is discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should have a fundamental understanding of the surgical phases of the resection, hemodynamic goals, and anesthesia challenges in attempts to individualize therapy to the patient's underlying pathophysiological condition. Therefore, an ideal approach for perioperative fluid therapy is always individualized. Planning and designing large-scale clinical trials are imperative to define the optimal type and amount of fluid for patients undergoing major hepatic resection. Further clinical trials evaluating different intraoperative goal-directed strategies are also eagerly awaited.

Anesthesia Management of Organ Donors

The shortage of suitable organs is the biggest obstacle for transplants. At present, most organs for transplant in the United States are from donation after neurologic determination of death (brain death). Potential organs for transplant need to maintain their viability during a series of insults, including the original disease, physiologic derangements during the dying process, ischemia, and reperfusion. Proper donor management before, during, and after procurement has potential to increase the number and quality of organs from donors. Anesthesiologists need to understand the physiologic derangements associated with brain death and the updated donor management during the periprocurement period.

Central Venous Pressure Drop After Hypovolemic Phlebotomy is a Strong Independent Predictor of Intraoperative Blood Loss During Liver Resection

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative hypovolemic phlebotomy (HP) has been suggested to reduce central venous pressure (CVP) before hepatectomy. This study aimed to analyze the impact of CVP drop after HP on intraoperative blood loss and postoperative renal function.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospective database including 100 consecutive patients (43 males and 57 females; mean age, 65 years; range 23-89 years) undergoing liver resection with HP was performed. The primary outcome variable was estimated blood loss (EBL), and the secondary outcome was postoperative serum creatinin (Scr). A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of intraoperative blood loss.

RESULTS

The median CVP before blood salvage was 8 mmHg (range 4-30 mmHg). The median volume of hypovolemic phlebotomy was 400 ml (range 200-1000 ml). After HP, CVP decreased to a median of 3 mmHg (range -2 to 16 mmHg), resulting in a median CVP drop of 5.5 mmHg (range 2-14 mmHg). The median EBL during liver resection was 165 ml (range 0-800 ml). The median preoperative serum creatinin (Scr) was 0.82 g/dl (range 0.5-1.74 g/dl), and the postoperative Scr on day 1 was 0.74 g/dl (range 0.44-1.68 g/dl). The CVP drop was associated with EBL (P < 0.001). There was no significant impact of CVP drop on postoperative Scr.

CONCLUSION

A CVP drop after HP is a strong independent predictor of EBL during liver resection. The authors advocate the routine use of HP to reduce perioperative blood loss and transfusion rates in liver surgery. As a predictive tool, CVP drop might help surgeons decide whether a laparoscopic approach is safe.

Effect of Hydroxyethyl Starch on Acute Kidney Injury After Living Donor Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Concerns about the adverse effects of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) on renal function have been raised in recent studies involving critically ill patients. We aimed to evaluate the effect of HES on acute kidney injury (AKI) after living donor right hepatectomy.

METHODS

We performed a 1:3 propensity score matching analysis of the medical records of 1641 living donors who underwent a donor right hepatectomy. They were divided into the control group (n = 60), who received only crystalloids, and the colloid group (n = 1,581), who received HES 130/0.4 and crystalloids. Postoperative AKI was determined by AKI Network (AKIN) and Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage (RIFLE) criteria.

RESULTS

A 1:3 propensity score matching was performed in 206 donors, 54 donors in the control group and 152 donors in the colloid group. For the matched colloid group, the median amount of 7.65 mL/kg (interquartile range, 6.64-9.20) of colloid and 58.19 mL/kg (interquartile range, 45.63-71.51) of crystalloid were given. The median amount of administered crystalloid in the control group was 56.48 mL/kg (interquartile range, 47.94-76.12) after propensity score matching. The incidences of AKI were not different between the control and colloid groups (P = .460 by AKIN criteria; P = .999 by RIFLE criteria).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative administration of HES may not be associated with AKI after living donor hepatectomy. This result can provide useful information on perioperative fluid management in living liver donors.

Intraoperative factors associated with delayed recovery of liver function after hepatectomy: analysis of 1969 living donors

BACKGROUND

The safety of healthy living donors who are undergoing hepatic resection is a primary concern. We aimed to identify intraoperative anaesthetic and surgical factors associated with delayed recovery of liver function after hepatectomy in living donors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 1969 living donors who underwent hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation. Delayed recovery of hepatic function was defined by increases in international normalised ratio of prothrombin time and concomitant hyperbilirubinaemia on or after post-operative day 5. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with delayed recovery of hepatic function after living donor hepatectomy.

RESULTS

Delayed recovery of liver function after donor hepatectomy was observed in 213 (10.8%) donors. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that sevoflurane anaesthesia, synthetic colloid, donor age, body mass index, fatty change and remnant liver volume were significant factors for prediction of delayed recovery of hepatic function. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that independent factors significantly associated with delayed recovery of liver function after donor hepatectomy were sevoflurane anaesthesia (odds ratio = 3.514, P < 0.001), synthetic colloid (odds ratio = 1.045, P = 0.033), donor age (odds ratio = 0.970, P = 0.003), female gender (odds ratio = 1.512, P = 0.014) and remnant liver volume (odds ratio = 0.963, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Anaesthesia with sevoflurane was an independent factor in predicting delayed recovery of hepatic function after donor hepatectomy. Although synthetic colloid may be associated with delayed recovery of hepatic function after donor hepatectomy, further study is required. These results can provide useful information on perioperative management of living liver donors.

High Stroke Volume Variation Method by Mannitol Administration Can Decrease Blood Loss During Donor Hepatectomy

Optimal fluid management to reduce blood loss during donor hepatectomy is important for maximizing donor safety. Mannitol can induce osmotic diuresis, helping prevent increased intravascular volume status. We therefore evaluated the effect of high stroke volume variation (SVV) method by mannitol administration and fluid restriction on blood loss during donor hepatectomy.In this prospective study, 64 donors scheduled for donor right hepatectomy were included and allocated into 2 groups. In group A, the SVV value of each patient was maintained at 10% to 20% during hepatic resection with 0.5 g/kg mannitol administration and fluid restriction at a rate of 2 to 4 mL/kg/h. In group B, the SVV value was maintained at <10% by fluid administration at a rate of 6 to 10 mL/kg/h without diuretic administration during surgery. Intraoperative blood loss was estimated by the loss of red cell mass. Surgeon satisfaction scores and postoperative outcomes, including acute kidney injury, abnormal chest radiographic findings, and hospital stay duration, were also assessed.SVV during hepatectomy was significantly higher in group A than in group B (11.0 ± 1.7 vs 6.5 ± 1.1, P < 0.001). The red cell mass loss was significantly lower in group A than in group B (145.4 ± 107.6 vs 307.9 ± 110.7 mL, P < 0.001). Surgeon satisfaction scores were higher in group A than in group B (2.8 ± 0.5 vs 2.0 ± 0.6, P < 0.001). The incidence of acute kidney injury, abnormal chest radiographic findings, and duration of hospital stay did not significantly differ between the 2 groups.Maintenance of high SVV by mannitol administration is effective and safe for reducing blood loss during donor hepatectomy.

Fluid management in living donor hepatectomy: Recent issues and perspectives

The importance of the safety of healthy living liver donors is widely recognized during donor hepatectomy which is associated with blood loss, transfusion, and subsequent post-operative morbidity. Although the low central venous pressure (CVP) technique can still be effective, it may not be advantageous concerning the safety of healthy donors undergoing hepatectomy. Emerging evidence suggests that stroke volume variation (SVV), a simple and useful index for fluid responsiveness and preload status in various clinical situations, can be applied as a guide for fluid management to reduce blood loss during living donor hepatectomy. Synthetic colloid solutions are also associated with serious adverse events such as the use of renal replacement therapy and transfusion in critically ill or septic patients. However, it is uncertain whether the intra-operative use of colloid solution is associated with similarly adverse effects in patients undergoing living donor hepatectomy. In this review article we discuss the recent issues regarding the low CVP technique and the high SVV method, i.e., maintaining 10%-20% of SVV, for fluid management in order to reduce blood loss during living donor hepatectomy. In addition, we briefly discuss the effects of intra-operative colloid or crystalloid administration for surgical rather than septic or critically ill patients.

Central venous pressure and liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A liver resection under low central venous pressure (CVP) has become standard practice; however, the benefits beyond a reduction in blood loss are not well reported. Moreover, the precise method to achieve CVP reduction has not been established. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RTCs) was performed to assess the effects of CVP on clinical outcome and to identify the optimum method of CVP reduction.

METHODS

EMBASE, Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane database were searched for trials comparing low CVP surgery with controls. The primary outcome was post-operative complications within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion rates and length of stay (LOS). Sub-group analysis was performed to assess the CVP reduction method on the outcome.

RESULTS

Eight trials were identified. No difference was observed in the morbidity rate between the high CVP and control groups [odds ratio (OR) = 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66, 1.40) P = 0.84, I(2) = 0%]. EBL [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -308.63 ml (95% CI -474.67, -142.58) P = < 0.001, I(2) = 73%] and blood transfusion rates [OR 0.65 (95% CI 0.44, 0.97) P = 0.040, I(2) = 37%] were significantly lower in the low CVP groups. Neither anaesthetic nor surgical methods of CVP reduction were associated with a reduced post-operative morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Low CVP surgery is associated with a reduction in EBL; however, this does not translate into an improvement in post-operative morbidity. The optimum method of CVP reduction has not been identified.

Effect of stroke volume variation-directed fluid management on blood loss during living-donor right hepatectomy: a randomised controlled study

Reducing blood loss is beneficial in living liver donor hepatectomy. Although it has been suggested that maintaining a low central venous pressure is important, it is known that low stroke volume variation may be associated with increased blood loss. Therefore, we compared the effect on blood loss of 40 patients randomly assigned to a high stroke volume variation group (maintaining 10-20% of stroke volume variation) vs 38 patients in a control group (maintaining < 10% stroke volume variation) during living-donor right hepatectomy. Mean (SD) blood loss during donor hepatectomy was significantly lower in the high stroke volume variation group than in the control group: 476 (131) ml vs 836 (341) ml, respectively (p < 0.001). Blood pressure and peri-operative laboratory values did not differ between the two groups. However, in the high stroke volume variation group, central venous pressure values were also significantly lower. We were unable to disentangle the effects of stroke volume variation and central venous pressure, but our results confirm that the two together appear beneficial.

A comprehensive method for predicting fatal liver failure of patients with liver cancer resection

There are many methods to assess liver function, but none of them has been verified as fully effective. The purpose of this study is to establish a comprehensive method evaluating perioperative liver reserve function (LRF) in patients with primary liver cancer (PLC).In this study, 310 PLC patients who underwent liver resection were included. The cohort was divided into a training set (n = 235) and a validation set (n = 75). The factors affecting postoperative liver dysfunction (POLD) during preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods were confirmed by logistic regression analysis. The equation for calculating the preoperative liver functional evaluation index (PLFEI) was established; the cutoff value of PLFEI determined through analysis by receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to predict postoperative liver function.The data showed that body mass index, international normalized ratio, indocyanine green (ICG) retention rate at 15 minutes (ICGR15), ICG elimination rate, standard remnant liver volume (SRLV), operative bleeding volume (OBV), blood transfusion volume, and operative time were statistically different (all P < 0.05) between 2 groups of patients with and without POLD. The relationship among PLFEI, ICGR15, OBV, and SRLV is expressed as an equation of "PLFEI = 0.181 × ICGR15 + 0.001 × OBV - 0.008 × SRLV." The cutoff value of PLFEI to predict POLD was -2.16 whose sensitivity and specificity were 90.3% and 73.5%, respectively. However, when predicting fatal liver failure (FLF), the cutoff value of PLFEI was switched to -1.97 whose sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 68.8%, respectively.PLFEI will be a more comprehensive, sensitive, and accurate index assessing perioperative LRF in liver cancer patients who receive liver resection. And keeping PLFEI <-1.97 is a safety margin for preventing FLF in PLC patients who underwent liver resection.

Nitroglycerine and patient position effect on central, hepatic and portal venous pressures during liver surgery

BACKGROUND

To reduce blood loss during liver surgery, a low central venous pressure (CVP) is recommended. Nitroglycerine (NG) with its rapid onset and offset can be used to reduce CVP. In this study, the effect of NG on portal and hepatic venous pressures (PVP and HVP) in different body positions was assessed.

METHODS

Thirteen patients undergoing liver resection were studied. Cardiac output (CO), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CVP were measured. PVP and HVP were measured using tip manometer catheters at baseline (BL) in horizontal position; during NG infusion, targeting a MAP of 60 mmHg, with NG infusion and the patient placed in 10 head-down position.

RESULTS

NG infusion reduced HVP from 9.7 ± 2.4 to 7.2 ± 2.4, PVP from 12.3 ± 2.2 to 9.7 ± 3.0 and CVP from 9.8 ± 1.9 to 7.2 ± 2.1 mmHg at BL. Head-down tilt during ongoing NG resulted in increases in HVP to 8.2 ± 2.1, PVP to 10.7 ± 3 and CVP to 11 ± 1.9 mmHg. CO at BL was 6.3 ± 1.1, which was reduced by NG to 5.8 ± 1.2. Head-down tilt together with NG infusion restored CO to 6.3 ± 1.0 l/min.

CONCLUSION

NG infusion leads to parallel reductions in CVP, HVP and PVP at horizontal body position. Thus, CVP can be used to guide NG dosage and fluid administration at horizontal position. NG infusion can be used to reduce HVP. Head-down tilt can be used during NG infusion to improve both blood pressure and CO without substantial increase in liver venous pressure. In head-down tilt, CVP dissociates from HVP and PVP.

Factors associated with blood transfusion in donor hepatectomy: results from 2344 donors at a large single center

BACKGROUND

The safety of healthy living donors undergoing hepatic resection for living-donor liver transplantation is of paramount concern. Although blood transfusions have been associated with morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy, there is limited information about the risk factors associated with blood transfusion in living liver donors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 2344 donors who underwent a hepatectomy for living-donor liver transplantation. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine blood transfusion predictors in living-donor hepatectomy.

RESULTS

Of these donors, 48 (2.0%) and 97 (4.1%) were transfused with packed red blood cell (PRBC) and fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), respectively. The amount of PRBC and FFP administered to donors transfused with blood products were 1.9±0.8 and 3.7±2.5 units, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, a low preoperative hemoglobin level was found to be an independent predictor of PRBC transfusion in donor hepatectomy (odds ratio=0.585; 95% confidence interval=0.451-0.758; P<0.001). A high graft-to-donor weight ratio predicted an FFP transfusion in donor hepatectomy (odds ratio=2.997; 95% confidence interval=1.226-7.327; P=0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that, in donor hepatectomy, the preoperative hemoglobin value and graft-to-donor weight ratio can provide useful information on the probability of PRBC and FFP transfusion, respectively.

The hydrostatic pressure indifference point underestimates orthostatic redistribution of blood in humans

The hydrostatic indifference point (HIP; where venous pressure is unaffected by posture) is located at the level of the diaphragm and is believed to indicate the orthostatic redistribution of blood, but it remains unknown whether HIP coincides with the indifference point for blood volume (VIP). During graded (± 20°) head-up (HUT) and head-down tilt (HDT) in 12 male volunteers, we determined HIP from central venous pressure and VIP from redistribution of both blood, using ultrasound imaging of the inferior caval vein (VIPui), and fluid volume, by regional electrical admittance (VIPadm). Furthermore, we evaluated whether inflation of medical antishock trousers (to 70 mmHg) affected HIP and VIP. Leaving cardiovascular variables unaffected by tilt, HIP was located 7 ± 4 cm (mean ± SD) below the 4th intercostal space (IC-4) during HUT and was similar (7 ± 3 cm) during HDT and higher (P < 0.0001) than both VIPui (HUT: 22 ± 16 cm; HDT: 13 ± 7 cm) and VIPadm (HUT: 29 ± 9 cm; HDT: 20 ± 9 cm below IC-4). During HUT antishock trousers elevated both HIP and VIPui [to 3 ± 5 cm (P = 0.028) and 17 ± 7 cm below IC-4 (P = 0.051), respectively], while VIPadm remained unaffected. By simultaneous recording of pressure and filling of the inferior caval vein as well as fluid distribution, we found HIP located corresponding to the diaphragm while VIP was placed low in the abdomen, and that medical antishock trousers elevated both HIP and VIP. The low indifference point for volume shows that the gravitational influence on distribution of blood is more profound than indicated by the indifference point for venous pressure.

Controlled low central venous pressure reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in hepatectomy

AIM: To evaluate the effect of low central venous pressure (LCVP) on blood loss and blood transfusion in patients undergoing hepatectomy.

METHODS: Electronic databases and bibliography lists were searched for potential articles. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating LCVP in hepatectomy was performed. The following three outcomes were analyzed: blood loss, blood transfusion and duration of operation.

RESULTS: Five RCTs including 283 patients were assessed. Meta-analysis showed that blood loss in the LCVP group was significantly less than that in the control group (MD = -391.95, 95%CI: -559.35--224.56, P < 0.00001). In addition, blood transfusion in the LCVP group was also significantly less than that in the control group (MD = -246.87, 95%CI: -427.06--66.69, P = 0.007). The duration of operation in the LCVP group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (MD = -18.89, 95%CI: -35.18--2.59, P = 0.02). Most studies found no significant difference in renal and liver function between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: Controlled LCVP is a simple and effective technique to reduce blood loss and blood transfusion during liver resection, and appears to have no detrimental effects on liver and renal function.

Minimizing blood loss during hepatectomy: a literature review

There are numerous techniques surgeons employ to reduce blood loss during partial hepatectomy. In this literature review, prospective studies from the last 20 years are examined to determine the techniques that are best supported by the literature. Some of the techniques include vascular control, multiple parenchymal transection techniques, various hemostatic agents, low central venous pressure, and hemodilution. The strategies supported most convincingly by the literature include low CVP and total hepatic inflow occlusion.

Is stroke volume variation a useful preload index in liver transplant recipients? A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI) is a good indicator of preload in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Although dynamic indices, such as stroke volume variation (SVV), have been used as reliable indicators in predicting fluid responsiveness, the evaluation of the relationship between SVV and direct preload status is limited. We investigated the relationship between SVV and RVEDVI, and tested the cutoff value of SVV to predict RVEDVI during liver transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 150 data pairs in 30 living donor liver transplant recipients were retrospectively investigated. Hemodynamic parameters, including SVV and RVEDVI were obtained from each patient at the 5 specific time points. Linear regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The SVV significantly correlated with the RVEDVI (r = -0.616, P < 0.001). Cutoff values for the upper and lower tertiles of RVEDVI were 157 mL/m(2) and 128 mL/m(2), respectively. Tertile analysis indicated that upper tertile of RVEDVI had a significantly lower SVV than the middle tertile (median; 5% vs 8%, P < 0.05), and middle tertile of RVEDVI had a significantly lower SVV than the lower tertile (median; 8% vs 11%, P < 0.05). A 6% cutoff value of SVV estimated the upper tertile RVEDVI (>157 mL/m(2)) with the area under the curve of ROC curve of 0.832. A 9% cutoff value of SVV estimated the lower tertile RVEDVI (<128 mL/m(2)) with the area under the curve of ROC curve of 0.792.

CONCLUSION

SVV may be a valuable estimator of RVEDVI in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Factors in perioperative care that determine blood loss in liver surgery

OBJECTIVES

Excessive blood loss during liver surgery contributes to postoperative morbidity and mortality and the minimizing of blood loss improves outcomes. This study examines pre- and intraoperative factors contributing to blood loss and identifies areas for improvement.

METHODS

All patients who underwent elective hepatic resection between June 2007 and June 2009 were identified. Detailed information on the pre- and perioperative clinical course was analysed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with intraoperative blood loss.

RESULTS

A total of 175 patients were studied, of whom 95 (54%) underwent resection of three or more segments. Median blood loss was 782 ml. Greater blood loss occurred during major resections and prolonged surgery and was associated with an increase in postoperative complications (P= 0.026). Peak central venous pressure (CVP) of >10 cm H(2)O was associated with increased blood loss (P= 0.01). Although no differences in case mix were identified, blood loss varied significantly among anaesthetists, as did intraoperative volumes of i.v. fluids and transfusion practices.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms a relationship between CVP and blood loss in hepatic resection. Intraoperative CVP values were higher than those described in other studies. There was variation in the intraoperative management of patients. Collaboration between surgical and anaesthesia teams is required to minimize blood loss and the standardization of intraoperative anaesthesia practice may improve outcomes following liver surgery.

[Anesthesiology: partner or competitor?]

Surgery and anesthesiology have always been closely connected. Within the increasing complexity of therapies and technical capabilities both subjects overlap in certain areas. This article deals with the question whether anesthesiology is acting as a partner or competitor in the cooperation with the various operative specialties. In several studies it has been shown that the outcome of surgical patients can be improved by communication and interaction with anesthesiology and that forming multidisciplinary teams will be highly beneficial for patients in intensive care units.

Does stroke volume variation predict intraoperative blood loss in living right donor hepatectomy?

BACKGROUND

Although stroke volume variation (SVV) is a valuable index of preload responsiveness, there is limited information about the association between low SVV and increased hepatectomy-related bleeding. We therefore evaluated whether SVV predicts blood loss during living donor hepatectomy.

METHODS

We evaluated 93 adult liver donors undergoing right hepatectomy for transplantation. Arterial blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, central venous pressure, SVV, cardiac output, and systemic vascular resistance were measured. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to determine independent factors and optimal cutoff values of hemodynamic parameters for predicting intraoperative blood loss ≥ 700 mL.

RESULTS

Of these 93 donors, 36 (38.7%) had blood loss ≥ 700 mL. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that factors associated with blood loss ≥ 700 mL included heart rate, SVV, cardiac output, and systemic vascular resistance. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that only SVV was an independent predictor of blood loss ≥ 700 mL. ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff value for SVV predicting blood loss ≥ 700 mL was 6% (area under the curve = 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

SVV is a significant independent predictor of blood loss ≥ 700 mL during donor hepatectomy, suggesting that low SVV may provide useful information on intraoperative bleeding in donors undergoing right hepatectomy.

Evaluation of intraoperative brain natriuretic peptide as a predictor of 1-year mortality after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), a marker of cardiac dysfunction, has been known to predict postoperative mortality, little is known about the postoperative prognostic ability of BNP in liver transplantation (OLT) recipients. We aimed to determine whether intraoperative BNP level can predict 1-year all-cause mortality after OLT.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 525 OLT recipients. BNP and hemodynamic parameters were simultaneously measured 1 hour after induction of anesthesia. Cox regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed to determine clinical predictors and optimal cutoff values of post-OLT mortality.

RESULTS

The 1-year all-cause mortality rate was 9.7% (51/525). Median BNP concentration was significantly higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors (114 vs 56 pg/mL, P < .001). Significant factors in univariate Cox regression analysis were Child-Pugh score, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, logBNP, hemoglobin, creatinine, heart rate, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, and central venous pressure. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, independent predictors of posttransplant mortality were MELD score and logBNP. However, simultaneously measured hemodynamic parameters did not remain predictors. BNP levels greater than a cutoff of 136 pg/mL (specificity = 83.5%, negative predictive value = 93.6%) were associated with increased post-OLT mortality (log-rank test P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative BNP level is an independent predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality after OLT with a high negative predictive value, suggesting that its measurement appears useful in identifying patients at low risk of post-OLT mortality.

Effect of patient position and PEEP on hepatic, portal and central venous pressures during liver resection

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that blood loss during liver resection may be reduced if central venous pressure (CVP) is kept at a low level. This can be achieved by changing patient position but it is not known how position changes affect portal (PVP) and hepatic (HVP) venous pressures. The aim of the study was to assess if changes in body position result in clinically significant changes in these pressures.

METHODS

We studied 10 patients undergoing liver resection. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CVP were measured using fluid-filled catheters, PVP and HVP with tip manometers. Measurements were performed in the horizontal, head up and head down tilt position with two positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels.

RESULTS

A 10° head down tilt at PEEP 5 cm H(2) O significantly increased CVP (11 ± 3 to 15 ± 3 mmHg) and MAP (72 ± 8 to 76 ± 8 mmHg) while head up tilt at PEEP 5 cm H(2) O decreased CVP (11 ± 3 to 6 ± 4 mmHg) and MAP (72 ± 8 to 63 ± 7 mmHg) with minimal changes in transhepatic venous pressures. Increasing PEEP from 5 to 10 resulted in small increases, around 1 mmHg in CVP, PVP and HVP. There was no significant correlation between changes in CVP vs. PVP and HVP during head up tilt and only a weak correlation between CVP and HVP by head down tilt.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes of body position resulted in marked changes in CVP but not in HVPs. Head down or head up tilt to reduce venous pressures in the liver may therefore not be effective measures to reduce blood loss during liver surgery.

Lactate and liver function tests after living donor right hepatectomy: a comparison of solutions with and without lactate

BACKGROUND

Hyperlactatemia can predict the prognosis of patients undergoing liver resection. The effects of lactated Ringer's solution on liver function have not been evaluated in patients undergoing major liver resection. We therefore compared the effects of two different crystalloid solutions, with and without lactate, on liver function test data and serum lactate level in living donors undergoing right hepatectomy.

METHODS

A total of 104 donors undergoing right hepatectomy for liver transplantation were randomly allocated to receive lactated Ringer's (LR) solution (n=52) or Plasmalyte (n=52). Anesthetic and fluid management were standardized. Acid-base status, lactate concentration, and liver function tests were analyzed at predetermined time points during the first 5 post-operative days.

RESULTS

The lactate concentrations were significantly higher in the LR group than in the Plasmalyte group 1 h after hepatectomy [4.2 (3.2-5.7) vs. 3.3 (2.6-4.6) mmol/l; P=0.005, median (interquartile ranges)]. In addition, the nadir concentration of albumin was significantly lower and the peak total bilirubin concentration and prothrombin time were significantly higher in the LR group compared with the Plasmalyte group. However, these changes in the LR group subsided within the first or second post-operative days, without apparent complications or prolongation of hospital stay. Post-operative peak concentrations of lactate were not correlated with nadir albumin concentration, peak bilirubin, or peak prothrombin time, in either group.

CONCLUSION

This prospective randomized study showed that non-lactate-containing crystalloid solution may have important advantages over LR solution, concerning lactate and liver profiles, in living donors undergoing right hepatectomy.

Risk factors for massive bleeding during major hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Massive bleeding during hepatectomy is a risk for mortality and morbidity. We examined the risk factors for massive bleeding and their correlations with outcomes.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective case series. Among 353 consecutively hepatectomized patients, the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 825 ml. Ten patients (2.8%) experienced EBL of between 3000 and 5000 ml. Five patients (1.4%) experienced massive EBL defined as more than 5000 ml, and all five patients had undergone right major hepatectomy (RMH) for primary liver cancer (PLC). All the patients with PLC who underwent RMH were divided into two groups: group I with EBL < or = 5000 ml (n = 19) and group II with EBL > 5000 ml (n = 5). Perioperative factors regarding massive bleeding and operative mortality and morbidity were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Among the ten patients who experienced EBL of between 3000 and 5000 ml, three had partial hepatectomy of no more than subsegmentectomy of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe and three had central bisegmentectomy. The mean tumor size was 7.9 +/- 4.7 cm in group I and 15.1 +/- 2.2 cm in group II (P = 0 .0034). Tumor compression of the inferior vena cava (IVC) on CT scans was observed in all patients in group II, but in no patients in group I (P < 0.0001). Four of five patients in group II received surgery through an anterior approach. The liver-hanging maneuver (LHM) was applied in 14 of 19 patients (74%) in group I but could not be applied in group II (P = 0.0059). No postoperative and in-hospital mortalities occurred in group II and there were no significant differences in the incidence of mortality and morbidity between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

RMH for large PLCs, tumor compression of the IVC, and an anterior approach without the LHM are risks for massive bleeding during hepatectomy. Preparation of rapid infusion devices in these cases is necessary to avoid prolonged hypotension.

Factors associated with changes in coagulation profiles after living donor hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection may be associated with postoperative coagulopathy. However, there is limited information about the predictors affecting coagulopathy after donor hepatectomy. We evaluated the contributors of maximal changes in prothrombin time (PT), activated thromboplastin time (aPTT), and platelet count in the development of postoperative coagulopathy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 864 living donors, all of whom received general anesthesia using desflurane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane. A coagulation derangement was defined as one or more of the following events postoperatively: peak PT >1.5 international normalized ratio (INR; highest quartile of PT), peak aPTT >46 seconds (highest quartile of aPTT), or nadir platelet count <100 × 10(9)/L. Factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of coagulopathy.

RESULTS

Mean postoperative peak PT, peak aPTT, and nadir platelet count were 1.4 ± 0.2 INR, 43.8 ± 23.7 seconds, and 155.9 ± 37.3 × 10(9)/L, respectively, with 39.4% of donors being at the risk for coagulation derangement. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that predictors of such derangement included anesthesia duration, remnant liver volume, and body mass index (BMI). However, coagulation derangement was not independently associated with age, gender, volatile anesthetics, central venous pressure, fatty change in the liver, estimated blood loss, or intraoperative hypotensive episodes.

CONCLUSION

We found that long anesthesia duration, low BMI, and small remnant liver volume were predictors of coagulation derangement. These results provide a better understanding of risk factors affecting changes in coagulation profiles after living donor hepatectomy.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation

A perception that living donor liver transplantation can be accomplished with an acceptable donor complication rate and recipient survival rate has led to the acceptance of living donor liver transplantation as a viable alternative to decreased deceased donor transplantation. Careful candidate evaluation and selection has been crucial to the success of this procedure. Advancements in the understanding of the lobar nature of the liver and of liver regeneration have advanced the surgical technique. Initial attempts at adult-to-adult donation utilized the left hepatic lobe, but now have evolved into use of the right hepatic lobe. Size matching is very important to successful graft function in the recipient. There is great concern regarding morbidity and mortality in donors. Biliary complications and infections continue to be among the most highly reported complications, although rates vary among centers and countries. Reports of single center complications have ranged from 9% to 67%. A survey of centers in the United States in 2003 reported complications of 10%. A series from our institution reported complications arising in 13 (33%) of 39 patients. A review focused on documenting donor deaths found 33 living liver donor deaths worldwide. The much publicized immediate postoperative mishap of 2002 that resulted in a donor’s death resulted in a drop in the utilization of living donor liver transplantation in the United States, from which this procedure has never fully recovered. The future development and expansion of living donor liver transplantation depends on open communication regarding donor complications and deaths. Close immediate postoperative monitoring and meticulous management will remain an essential aspect in limiting donor complications and deaths.

Anesthesia and outcome after partial hepatectomy for adult-to-adult donor transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The worldwide adoption of live liver donors as a source of donor organs for transplantation has been curtailed by the very real risk of complications in otherwise healthy people. Our objective in this review is to outline the perioperative management of the live liver donor for adult-to-adult transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence and severity of complications following live liver donation is extremely variable, and reporting needs to be standardized if we are to improve the perioperative management and outcomes. Agreed definitions would clarify the incidence and severity of postoperative complications, allow identification of areas in which management can be improved and suggest areas for future investigation. Such an effort will require the cooperation of centers around the world.

SUMMARY

Live liver donation is a valuable option for organ donation that can be conducted safely with a multidisciplinary perioperative approach. Future considerations should focus on the recovery period and how the intraoperative management can be optimized to minimize the impact of surgery on donors' quality of life.

Low central venous pressure with milrinone during living donor hepatectomy

Maintaining a low central venous pressure (CVP) has been frequently used in liver resections to reduce blood loss. However, decreased preload carries potential risks such as hemodynamic instability. We hypothesized that a low CVP with milrinone would provide a better surgical environment and hemodynamic stability during living donor hepatectomy. Thirty-eight healthy adult liver donors were randomized to receive either milrinone (milrinone group, n = 19) or normal saline (control group, n = 19) infusion during liver resection. The surgical field was assessed using a four-point scale. Intraoperative vital signs, blood loss, the use of vasopressors and diuretics and postoperative laboratory data were compared between groups. The milrinone group showed a superior surgical field (p < 0.001) and less blood loss (142 +/- 129 mL vs. 378 +/- 167 mL, p < 0.001). Vital signs were well maintained in both groups but the milrinone group required smaller amounts of vasopressors and less-frequent diuretics to maintain a low CVP. The milrinone group also showed a more rapid recovery pattern after surgery. Milrinone-induced low CVP improves the surgical field with less blood loss during living donor hepatectomy and also has favorable effects on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative recovery.