Immune function in blood donors following short-term lymphocytapheresis

The effect of repeated stimulated granulocyte donations on hematopoietic indexes in donors: a 24-year donor center experience

BACKGROUND

Short- and long-term effects of mobilization regimens in hematopoietic stem cell and granulocyte donors have been well characterized. In this study, we examined the longitudinal hematopoietic changes related to repeat stimulated granulocyte donation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Complete blood counts for consecutive granulocyte donors between October 1994 and May 2017 were compared to unstimulated granulocyte donors. Plateletpheresis donors served as controls. The longitudinal change in precollection white blood cell (WBC) counts for these donor groups were modeled using a linear mixed-effects model. The investigated variables were granulocyte, lymphocyte, and monocyte counts and the granulocyte collection yield. Contrasts were performed to explore the effect of donation number on precollection counts.

RESULTS

For the granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor plus dexamethasone (G-CSF/Dex)-stimulated group, both the granulocyte and the lymphocyte counts decreased 6.51 × 10⁹ /L (-23.1%, p < 0.001) and 0.21 × 10⁹ /L (-20.4%, p < 0.001), respectively, between Donation 1 and Donation 20. This effect was still present at the 3- to 4-year interval (b = -0.0008313, SE = 0.00029, p = 0.004). For the unstimulated donor group between Donation 1 and Donation 20, the lymphocyte count decreased by 0.62 × 10⁹ /L (-51.5%, p < 0.001). This effect was only significant up to Year 2 (b = -0.0026, SE = 0.0010, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Past granulocyte donations were found to have a statistically strong negative effect on precollection granulocyte counts and lymphocyte counts and decreased granulocyte yield both in the G-CSF/Dex-stimulated donors and the unstimulated donors. In this statistical model, for both these groups, the effect of past donations on granulocyte and WBC counts were still detectable 2 years later.

Perspectives on sipuleucel-T: Its role in the prostate cancer treatment paradigm

Sipuleucel-T is an autologous cellular immunotherapy approved in the US for patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This significant advance for mCRPC treatment provides healthcare professionals with another effective therapy to extend survival. As an immunotherapy, sipuleucel-T possesses specific characteristics differentiating it from traditional therapies. At a roundtable meeting of experts, sipuleucel-T data were discussed, focusing on interpretation and clinical implications. Important differences between immunotherapies and traditional therapies were explored, e.g., mode of action, outcomes, data consistency and robustness, timing of sipuleucel-T treatment, and future perspectives in areas such as short-term markers of long-term benefit.

An analysis of leukapheresis and central venous catheter use in the randomized, placebo controlled, phase 3 IMPACT trial of Sipuleucel-T for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Sipuleucel-T is an autologous cellular immunotherapy. We review the safety of the leukapheresis procedure required for sipuleucel-T preparation and complications related to venous catheter use in the randomized, placebo controlled phase 3 IMPACT (IMmunotherapy for ProstAte Cancer Trial) study (NCT 00065442).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 512 patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer were enrolled in the study. All patients were scheduled to undergo 3 standard 1.5 to 2.0 blood volume leukapheresis procedures at 2-week intervals. Leukapheresis related adverse events and those related to venous catheter use were reviewed. Immune cell counts were examined throughout the treatment course.

RESULTS

Of 512 enrolled patients 506 underwent 1 or more leukapheresis procedures and were included in this analysis. Adverse events were comparable between the sipuleucel-T and control arms. Leukapheresis related adverse events were primarily associated with transient hypocalcemia (39.3%). Most leukapheresis related adverse events (97%) were of mild/moderate intensity. Median white blood cell count and absolute monocyte and lymphocyte counts were stable and within normal ranges throughout the treatment course. Of all patients 23.3% had a central venous catheter placed primarily for leukapheresis. Patients with vs without a central venous catheter had a higher risk of infection potentially related to catheter use (11.9% vs 1.3%, p <0.0001) and a trend toward a higher incidence of venous vascular events potentially related to catheter use, excluding the central nervous system (5.9% vs 2.1%, p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse events related to leukapheresis are manageable and quickly reversible. The majority of patients can undergo leukapheresis without a central venous catheter. Central venous catheters are associated with an increased risk of infections and venous vascular events. Peripheral intravenous access should be used when feasible.

Effect of long-term platelet donation on lymphocyte subsets and plasma protein concentrations

Previous studies of changes in immune function in platelet donors have investigated subjects who were undergoing plateletpheresis using older equipment that is no longer in general use. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of long-term platelet donation on lymphocyte numbers and subsets and plasma protein concentrations in platelet donors using newer cell separators. Three groups included in the study were nondonor controls (n = 27), long-term whole blood donors (n = 29), and long-term platelet donors (n = 20). Using a cross-sectional analysis, lymphocyte numbers and subsets were determined and compared among the three groups. Plasma concentrations of total protein, globulin, albumin, and IgG were also compared. Among the three groups there were no significant differences in total white blood cell counts, percentage or absolute number of lymphocytes, or percentage or absolute number of lymphocyte subsets. Serum total protein, globulin, albumin, and IgG concentrations of platelet donors were within normal ranges. These data support the current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and American Association of Blood Banks' standards for the frequency of platelet donation allowed and monitoring required for plateletpheresis donors. Furthermore, these data indicate that the FDA could eliminate the requirement for the warning in informed consents about lymphocyte depletion in platelet donors.

Repeat plateletpheresis: the effects on the donor and the yield

Requirements for HLA ot otherwise matched single-donor platelets may sometimes require repeat plateletpheresis of an individual donor. AABB standards permit the repeat collection of platelets by plateletpheresis of a single donor at 48-hour intervals, whereas recent recommendations from England state that a donor should not donate platelets more often than 12 times a year. To assess the effects of repeat plateletpheresis on the donor, we have studied the hematological indices and the product yields following every other day plateletpheresis of 13 normal donors who gave a total of 10 times during 22 days. The platelet count decreased in every case, with the lowest values reached at the third donation (day 5). The pre-donation count averaged 225 +/- 53 x 10(9)/l decreasing to 174 +/- 27 x 10(9)/l at the time of the 3rd donation then increasing by the 6th donation to 198 +/- 46 x 10(9)/l. The yield in the product decreased from 3.2 +/- 1.3 x 10(11) on day 1 to 2.6 +/- 0.8 x 10(11) for the third donation, returning thereafter to higher values. In spite of the expected and apparent stimulation of platelet production through feedback, the counts did not rebound above starting levels indicating a basic homeostatic mechanism. The donor WBC showed minimal changes during the study period, however there was a significant increase in the total number of lymphocytes by the 3rd procedure; this was corrected by the fifth procedure. The absolute number and ratio of T4 (helper) and T8 (suppressor) lymphocytes did not change.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)