The sequestration, processing and retention of honey-bee promelittin made in amphibian oocytes

Proline-specific dipeptidyl peptidase from the blue blowfly Calliphora vicina hydrolyzes in vitro the ecdysiostatic peptide trypsin-modulating oostatic factor (Neb-TMOF)

To elucidate the mechanisms of inactivation of the ecdysiostatic peptide trypsin-modulating oostatic factor (Neb-TMOF) in the blue blowfly Calliphora vicina, we investigated its proteolytic degradation. In homogenates and membrane and soluble fractions, this hexapeptide (sequence: NPTNLH) was hydrolyzed into two fragments, NP and TNLH, suggesting the involvement of a proline-specific dipeptidyl peptidase. The dipeptidyl peptidase activity was highest in the late larval stage. It was purified 240-fold from soluble fractions of pupae of mixed age and classified on the basis of several catalytic properties as an invertebrate homologue of mammalian dipeptidyl peptidase IV (EC 3.4.14.5). Fly dipeptidyl peptidase IV has a molecular mass of 200 kDa, showed a pH optimum of 7.5-8.0 with the chromogenic substrate Gly-Pro-4-nitroanilide, and cleaved other chromogenic substrates with penultimate Pro or, with lower activity, Ala. It liberated Xaa-Pro dipeptides from the N-terminus of several bioactive peptides including substance P, neuropeptide Y, and peptide YY but not from bradykinin, indicating that the peptide bond between the two proline residues was resistant to cleavage. Fly dipeptidyl peptidase belongs to the serine class of proteases as the mammalian enzyme does; the fly enzyme, however, is not inhibited by several selective or nonselective inhibitors of its mammalian counterpart. It is suggested that dipeptidyl peptidases exert a regulatory role for the clearance not only of TMOF in files but for other bioactive peptides in various invertebrates.

Expression of yeast invertase in oocytes from Xenopus laevis. Secretion of active enzyme differing in glycosylation

In an effort to understand factors that control glycosylation of proteins and processing of carbohydrate chains, invertase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae was expressed in a heterologous system. Microinjection of invertase-specific in vitro transcripts into oocytes from Xenopus laevis resulted in synthesis, glycosylation and secretion of enzymatically active invertase. It was found that although the number of carbohydrate chains acquired is the same as in yeast, the carbohydrate processing is different. This is consistent with the notion that the usage of a glycosylation site is determined by the protein part, whereas subsequent processing occurs in a host-dependent manner. Both, high-mannose and complex type glycans, most likely tri- and tetra-antennary structures, were synthesized in oocytes. The data obtained suggests that in this system the core chains of yeast invertase remain high-mannose type, whereas the more extensively processed polymannose chains are modified to complex oligosaccharides. In the presence of the glycosylation inhibitor, tunicamycin, and the glucosidase processing inhibitor, methyldeoxynojirimycin, secretion of invertase is significantly decreased, whereas in the presence of the mannosidase inhibitor, deoxymannojirimycin, no influence of secretion is seen. This may suggest that glycosylation of invertase is important for early secretion events. Expression of invertase lacking the leader sequence results in loss of glycosylation and secretion in oocytes. This indicates that yeast signals for secretion are functional in this higher eukaryote.

Proline residues in the maturation and degradation of peptide hormones and neuropeptides

The proteases involved in the maturation of regulatory peptides like those of broader specificity normally fail to cleave peptide bonds linked to the cyclic amino acid proline. This generates several mature peptides with N-terminal X-Pro-sequences. However, in certain non-mammalian tissues repetitive pre-sequences of this type are removed by specialized dipeptidyl (amino)peptidases during maturation. In mammals, proline-specific proteases are not involved in the biosynthesis of regulatory peptides, but due to their unique specificity they could play an important role in the degradation of them. Evidence exists that dipeptidyl (amino)peptidase IV at the cell surface of endothelial cells sequesters circulating peptide hormones which are then susceptible to broader aminopeptidase attack. The cleavage of several neuropeptides by prolyl endopeptidase has been demonstrated in vitro, but its role in the brain is questionable since the precise localization of the protease is not clarified.

The processing and secretion of rat serum albumin by oocytes from Xenopus laevis

Microinjection of rat liver mRNA into Xenopus oocytes led to the synthesis of intracellular proalbumin and the secretion of mature albumin into the incubation medium. The ionophore monensin abolished the secretion of albumin but not the processing of the precursor. A variety of protease inhibitors were added to the incubation medium but there was no detectable inhibition of proalbumin cleavage.

Synthesis, processing, and secretion of rat immunoglobulin E made in Xenopus oocytes

Rat immunoglobulin E (IgE) synthesized in Xenopus laevis oocytes, injected with rat plasmacytoma mRNA, was analysed by specific immunoprecipitation and SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing as well as non-reducing conditions. The results indicate that the oocytes will translate and correctly process the rat IgE heavy and light chains, resulting in secretion of a correctly assembled, normal immunoglobulin molecule. The normal, extensive glycosylation of the IgE heavy chain (e-chain) is faithfully carried out by the oocytes; therefore, this posttranslational modification is apparently of an unspecific nature, and does not depend upon a mechanism specific for plasma cells.

The biosynthesis of biologically active proteins in mRNA-microinjected Xenopus oocytes

The basic properties of mRNA-injected Xenopus oocytes as a heterologous system for the production of biologically active proteins will be reviewed. The advantages and limitations involved in the use of this in ovo system will be discussed, as compared with in vitro cell-free translation systems and with in vivo microinjected mammalian cells in culture. The different assay systems that have been utilized for the identification of the biological properties of oocyte-produced proteins will be described. This section will review the determination of properties such as binding of natural ligands, like heme or alpha-bungarotoxin; immunological recognition by antibodies; subcellular compartmentalization and/or secretion; various enzymatic catalytic activities; and induction in ovo of biological activities that affect other living cells in culture, such as those of interferon and of the T-cell receptor. The limitations involved in interpretation of results obtained using mRNA-injected oocytes will be critically reviewed. Special attention will be given to the effect of oocyte proteases and of changes in the endogenous translation rate on quantitative measurements of oocyte-produced proteins. In addition, the validity of the various measurement techniques will be evaluated. The various uses of bioassays of proteins produced in mRNA-injected Xenopus oocytes throughout the last decade will be reviewed. Nuclear and cytoplasmic injections, mRNA and protein turnover measurements and abundance calculations, and the use of in ovo bioassays for molecular cloning experiments will be discussed in this section. Finally, potential future uses of the oocyte system in various fields of research, such as immunology, neurobiology, and cell biology will be suggested.

Xenopus oocytes can secrete bacterial beta-lactamase

Most secretory proteins are synthesized as precursor polypeptides carrying N-terminal, hydrophobic sequences which, by means of a signal recognition particle (SRP), trigger the membrane transfer of the polypeptide and are subsequently cleaved off. The signal sequences appear to be interchangeable between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. In bacteria, secretion only involves the crossing of a membrane, whereas in eukaryotes the secretory process can be separated into two distinct phases: translocation across the membrane of the rough endoplasmic reticulum and subsequent intraluminal transport by processes involving vesicle budding and fusion. Since secretory proteins must be distinguished from other soluble proteins destined for various sites in the reticular system, it is conceivable that eukaryotic secretory proteins possess additional markers distinct from the signal peptide to guide the polypeptide after its transfer through the membrane. Proteins are secreted at different rates from a eukaryotic cell, suggesting a role in intracellular transport for receptors with differing affinities for some topogenic features in secretory proteins. We have tested this possibility by introducing into the lumen of eukaryotic rough endoplasmic reticulum a prokaryotic protein which, by virtue of its origin, had not been adapted to the eukaryotic secretory pathway. We reasoned that secretion of the bacterial protein would indicate that after membrane transfer no topogenic signal(s) and corresponding recognition system(s) are required. We report here that this is indeed the case.

Cleavage of honeybee prepromelittin by an endoprotease from rat liver microsomes: identification of intact signal peptide

It has previously been shown that rat liver microsomes contain a proteolytic enzyme that cleaves honeybee prepromelittin to yield promelittin. This enzyme has now been further purified by centrifugation on a sucrose-deoxycholate gradient and then reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles. Incubation of prepromelittin with vesicles in the presence of melittin yields, in addition to promelittin, a hydrophobic peptide. The latter could be isolated by extraction with l-butanol and paper electrophoresis in 30% formic acid and was shown to be intact signal peptide by analysis of peptic fragments and automated Edman degradation. The microsomal enzyme is thus an endoprotease that hydrolyzes prepromelittin exclusively at the pre-pro junction. The precision of this cleavage of an insect preprotein by a rat liver enzyme indicates that we are dealing with the ubiquitous eukaryotic signal peptidase.