Impairment of renal function after islet transplant alone or islet-after-kidney transplantation using a sirolimus/tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen

Cell Therapy for Type 1 Diabetes: From Islet Transplantation to Stem Cells

The field of cell therapy of type 1 diabetes is a particularly interesting example in the scenario of regenerative medicine. In fact, β-cell replacement has its roots in the experience of islet transplantation, which began 40 years ago and is currently a rapidly accelerating field, with several ongoing clinical trials using β cells derived from stem cells. Type 1 diabetes is particularly suitable for cell therapy as it is a disease due to the deficiency of only one cell type, the insulin-producing β cell, and this endocrine cell does not need to be positioned inside the pancreas to perform its function. On the other hand, the presence of a double immunological barrier, the allogeneic one and the autoimmune one, makes the protection of β cells from rejection a major challenge. Until today, islet transplantation has taught us a lot, pioneering immunosuppressive therapies, graft encapsulation, tissue engineering, and test of different implant sites and has stimulated a great variety of studies on β-cell function. This review starts from islet transplantation, presenting its current indications and the latest published trials, to arrive at the prospects of stem cell therapy, presenting the latest innovations in the field.

Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppressive regimen in type 1 diabetes patients receiving islet transplantation: single-group phase 1/2 trial

BACKGROUND

Our final objective is to develop an adoptive therapy with tolerogenic donor-specific type 1 T regulatory cells for patients with type 1 diabetes undergoing islet transplantation. The achievement of this objective depends on the availability of an immunosuppressive treatment compatible with the survival, function, and expansion of type 1 T regulatory cells.

METHODS

For this purpose, we designed a single-group, phase 1 to 2 trial with an immunosuppression protocol including: (i) rapamycin treatment before the first islet infusion (starting ≥ 30 days before transplantation); (ii) induction therapy with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) instead of anti-interleukin-2Ra monoclonal antibody (after the first islet infusion only); (iii) short-term treatment with steroids and interleukin-1Ra (right before and for 2 weeks after each infusion); rapamycin+mycophenolate mofetil treatment as maintenance therapy. The target enrollment was 10 patients.

RESULTS

Ten of 15 patients who started the pretransplant rapamycin treatment completed it. Nine of 10 patients did not complete the induction therapy with ATG, and three of 10 required adaptation of maintenance immunosuppression caused by side effects. Four of 10 patients acquired insulin independence which can be maintained up to year 3 after last infusion. All six other patients have lost their graft, and the early graft loss was associated with lower dose of ATG during induction.

CONCLUSION

This protocol resulted feasible, safe but less efficient in maintaining graft survival during the time than other T-cell depletion-based protocols. An adequate induction at the first infusion should be considered to improve the overall clinical outcome.

Impact of the number of infusions on 2-year results of islet-after-kidney transplantation in the GRAGIL network

BACKGROUND

Insulin independence after islet transplantation is generally achieved after multiple infusions. However, single infusion would increase the number of recipients. Our aim was to evaluate the results of islet-after-kidney transplantation according to the number of infusions.

METHODS

Islets were isolated at the Geneva University, shipped, and transplanted into French patients from the Swiss-French GRAGIL network, on the "Edmonton" immunosuppression protocol between 2004 and 2010.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were transplanted with 33 preparations. Fifteen patients reached 24 months follow-up; eight subjects were single-graft recipients and seven were double-graft recipients. Finally, single-graft recipients received a median of 5312 islet equivalents/kg (5186-6388) vs. 10,564 (10,054-11,375) for double-graft recipients (P=0.0003) with similar islet mass at first infusion. Insulin independence was achieved in five of eight single-graft subjects (62.5%) versus five of seven in double-graft subjects (71.4%), not significant. Median insulin independence duration was 4.7 (3.1-15.2) months after one infusion vs. 19 (9.6-20.8) months after two infusions (not significant). At 24 months posttransplant, comparing single- with double-graft patients, insulin doses were 0.23 (0.11-0.34) U/kg vs. 0.02 (0.0-0.23) U/kg, P=0.11; HbA1c was 6.5% (5.9%-6.8%) vs. 6.2% (5.9%-6.3%), P=0.16; and basal C-peptide was 302 (143-480) pmol/L vs. 599 (393-806) pmol/L, P=0.05. Only 37.5% of single-graft patients had a β-score ≥4 compared with 100% of double-graft patients (P=0.03). Two recipients experienced postinfusion bleeding, and two patients (13%) showed renal dysfunction in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

One infusion achieves good glycemic control and sometimes insulin independence. However, double-graft patients remain insulin-free longer, tend to have lower HbA1c, and show better graft function 24 months after transplant.

Clinical islet transplantation in Japan

INTRODUCTION

The results of clinical islet transplantation in Japan are, here in, reported and discussed its efficacy and problems.

METHODS

Since the first islet transplantation was performed in 2004, 65 islet isolations and 34 islet transplantations to 18 type 1 diabetic patients have been performed in Japan.

RESULTS

Following islet transplantation, patients experienced decreased insulin requirements and lower hemoglobin A1C levels, and positive serum C-peptide levels. All patients achieved stabilized blood glucose levels and the disappearance of hypoglycemic unawareness. Although three patients achieved insulin independency for a limited period, persistent islet graft function was difficult to maintain. Overall islet graft survival was 86.5% at 6 months, 78.7% at 1 year, and 62.9% at 2 years after the first islet transplantation. In our institution, we carried out 23 islet isolations and six islet transplantations to four patients. Although insulin independency was not achieved, all patients showed a disappearance of hypoglycemic unawareness.

CONCLUSIONS

Using data from the Japanese Trial of Islet Transplantation, the effectiveness of islet transplantation was shown even when using the pancreata from non-heart-beating donors. Although there are a number of problems to be solved and further improvement is needed, we can state that the introduction of clinical islet transplantation offers hope for type 1 diabetic patients.

Rapamycin in islet transplantation: friend or foe?

The Edmonton protocol was undoubtedly a major step forward in the history of islet transplantation. Its immunosuppression regimen was largely based on the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin (sirolimus), which remains the most frequently used immunosuppressive drug in clinical islet transplant protocols. As time reveals the somewhat disappointing long-term results achieved with the Edmonton protocol, a number of publications have appeared addressing the potential beneficial or deleterious role of rapamycin on islet cell engraftment, function survival and regeneration, as well as on its side-effects in human subjects. This paper reviews the sometimes contradictory evidence on the impact of rapamycin in islet transplantation.

Allogeneic islet transplantation

Significant progress has been made in the field of beta-cell replacement therapies by islet transplantation in patients with unstable Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Recent clinical trials have shown that islet transplantation can reproducibly lead to insulin independence when adequate islet numbers are implanted. Benefits include improvement of glycemic control, prevention of severe hypoglycemia and amelioration of quality of life. Numerous challenges still limit this therapeutic option from becoming the treatment of choice for T1DM. The limitations are primarily associated with the low islet yield of human pancreas isolations and the need for chronic immunosuppressive therapies. Herein the authors present an overview of the historical progress of islet transplantation and outline the recent advances of the field. Cellular therapies offer the potential for a cure for patients with T1DM. The progress in beta-cell replacement treatment by islet transplantation as well as those of emerging immune interventions for the restoration of self tolerance justify great optimism for years to come.

Sirolimus toxicity and vascular endothelial growth factor release from islet and renal cell lines

Presently, sirolimus (rapamycin) is used as both induction and maintenance immunosuppression in solid organ transplants, including whole pancreas and kidney, and islet transplantation. Sirolimus has been suggested to have deleterious effects on islet beta-cell and renal function. We investigated the effect of sirolimus on the viability of islets, podocytes, and renal tubular cells. Sirolimus reduced the viability of islets and HK-2 human proximal renal tubular cells in vitro. This toxic effect was associated with a reduction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) release by islets but not the proximal tubular cells. Sirolimus reduced both viability and VEGF production by murine beta-cells, and blockade of VEGF-164 was associated with a reduction in viability. Transfection of murine islets with adenoviral VEGF-165 improved islet viability. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that sirolimus is toxic to islets and beta-cells by blockade of VEGF-mediated survival pathways.

Kidney function after islet transplant alone in type 1 diabetes: impact of immunosuppressive therapy on progression of diabetic nephropathy

OBJECTIVE

Islet transplantation alone is an alternative for the replacement of pancreatic endocrine function in patients with type 1 diabetes. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of the Edmonton immunosuppressive protocol (tacrolimus-sirolimus association) on kidney function.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Nineteen patients with type 1 diabetes and metabolic instability received islet transplantation alone and immunosuppressive therapy according to the Edmonton protocol. Serum creatinine (sCr), creatinine clearance (CrCl), and 24-h urinary protein excretion (UPE) were assessed at baseline and during a follow-up of 339 patient-months.

RESULTS

After islet transplantation we observed 1) sCr within the normal range in all but two patients in whom sCr increased immediately after islet transplantation, and despite withdrawal of immunosuppression, patients progressed to end-stage renal disease (ESRD); 2) CrCl remained within the normal range for those patients who had normal baseline values and decreased, progressing to ESRD in two patients with a decreased baseline CrCl; and 3) 24-h UPE worsened (>300 mg/24 h) in four patients. In the two patients who progressed to ESRD, the worsening of 24-h UPE occurred immediately after islet transplantation. In one patient 24-h UPE worsening occurred at 18 months, and, after withdrawal of immunosuppression, it returned to the normal range. In another patient 24-h UPE increased at 24 months and remained stable while immunosuppression was continued.

CONCLUSIONS

In type 1 diabetic patients receiving islet transplantation alone, the association of tacrolimus and sirolimus should be used only in patients with normal kidney function. Alternative options for immunosuppressive treatment should be considered for patients with even a mild decrease of kidney function.

Pancreas and islet cell transplantation in diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The following review of the field of whole organ pancreas and islet cell transplantation for type 1 diabetes mellitus is timely and relevant, since new findings and outcomes in both fields have emerged in the recent past.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research in the field of whole organ pancreas transplantation is characterized by small advances in knowledge in an established, but not widely used procedure. For islet transplantation, the field is evolving more rapidly. Disappointing clinical trial results, however, have hampered enthusiasm for this procedure. Islet transplantation research recently has focused on delineating possible causes of failure to achieve or sustain insulin independence and innovations to address both this failure and the current shortage of islets for clinical transplantation. Pancreas transplantation research is less innovative at this point, focusing mainly on optimizing clinical results.

SUMMARY

These published findings suggest that at the present time, clinical application of islet transplantation should be limited to clinical trials, focusing on techniques to enhance islet engraftment and survival. Whole organ pancreas transplantation remains the preferable transplant option for the type one diabetic patient.

Islet cell transplantation today

INTRODUCTION

Long-term studies strongly suggest that tight control of blood glucose can prevent the development and retard the progression of chronic complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus. In contrast to conventional insulin treatment, replacement of a patient's islets of Langerhans either by pancreas organ transplantation or by isolated islet transplantation is the only treatment to achieve a constant normoglycemic state and avoiding hypoglycemic episodes, a typical adverse event of multiple daily insulin injections. However, the cost of this benefit is still the need for immunosuppressive treatment of the recipient with all its potential risks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Islet cell transplantation offers the advantage of being performed as a minimally invasive procedure in which islets can be perfused percutaneously into the liver via the portal vein. Between January 1990 and December 2004, 458 pancreatic islet transplants worldwide have been reported to the International Islet Transplant Registry (ITR) at our Third Medical Department, University of Giessen/Germany.

RESULTS

Data analysis of islet cell transplants performed in the last 5 years (1999-2004) shows at 1 year after adult islet transplantation a patient survival rate of 97%, a functioning islet graft in 82% of the cases, whereas insulin independence was meanwhile achieved in 43% of the cases. However, using a novel protocol established by the Edmonton Center/Canada, the insulin independence rates have improved significantly reaching meanwhile a 50-80% level.

CONCLUSION

Finally, the concept of islet cell or stem cell transplantation is most attractive, as it offers many perspectives: islet cell availability could become unlimited and islet or stem cells my be transplanted without life-long immunosuppressive treatment of the recipient, just to mention two of them.

Transplantation for type 1 diabetes: whole organ pancreas and islet cells

Beta-cell transplantation can be either a whole organ pancreas transplant or an islet cell transplant; both have resulted in restoration of a normoglycemic state. These transplants can be performed in conjunction with kidney transplants or as solitary grafts. In general, whole organ transplants have more sustained and durable function and are more widely available than their islet counterparts, but entail a much more invasive procedure. Beta-cell transplantation continues to evolve, with considerable improvement in results over the past two decades, and is a cost-effective option for select patients with type 1 diabetes.

Preservation of Renal Function and Cardiovascular Risk Factors

An update is given about some factors leading to loss of renal allograft, especially in relation to the use of tacrolimus and cyclosporine. We discuss both immunological, such as suboptimal immunosuppression, acute rejection, and noncompliance, as well as nonimmunological factor's such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic toxic effects of immunosuppressants, older donors, and delayed graft function.

Sequential kidney/islet transplantation: efficacy and safety assessment of a steroid-free immunosuppression protocol

The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency and safety of the Edmonton immunosuppression protocol in recipients of islet-after-kidney (IAK) grafts. Fifteen islet infusions were administered to 8 patients with type 1 diabetes and a functioning kidney graft. Immunosuppression was switched on the day of transplantation to a regimen associating sirolimus-tacrolimus-daclizumab. Insulin-independence was achieved in all patients for at least 3 months, with an actual rate of 71% at 1 year after transplantation (5 of 7 patients). After 24-month mean follow-up, five have ongoing insulin independence, 11-34 months after transplantation, with normal HbA1c, fructosamine and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) values. Results of arginine-stimulation tests improved over time, mostly after the second islet infusion. Severe adverse events included bleeding after percutaneous portal access (n=2), severe pneumonia attributed to sirolimus toxicity (n=1), kidney graft loss after immunosuppression discontinuation (n=1), reversible humoral kidney rejection (n=1) and fever of unknown origin (n=1). These data indicate that the Edmonton approach can be successfully applied to the IAK setting. This procedure is associated with significant side effects and only patients with stable function of the kidney graft should be considered. The net harm versus benefit has not yet been established and will require further studies with larger numbers of enrolled subjects.