The beneficial role of simultaneous splenectomy in living donor liver transplantation in patients with small-for-size graft

Spleen volume after stage-I associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy predicts future liver remnant

BACKGROUND

The spleen has been reported to inhibit liver regeneration following hepatectomy; however, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In particular, its role in future liver remnant (FLR) regeneration after associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) warrants investigation.

AIM

To evaluate the relationship between splenic volume changes and FLR regeneration following ALPPS-stage I in patients with massive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Clinical data from 65 HCC patients who underwent ALPPS between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Liver and spleen volumes were measured pre- and post-ALPPS-stage I use the IQQA-Liver system. The kinetic growth rate (KGR) of the FLR was calculated. Pearson correlation and logistic regression were used to identify predictors of FLR hypertrophy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine cutoff values for splenic predictors.

RESULTS

Following ALPPS-stage I, FLR volume significantly increased from 35.57%±8.51-54.31%±11.19% of standard liver volume (SLV) (P < 0.001), with a median KGR of 4.65%/day. Splenic volume also increased (218.65 ± 84.77 cm³ vs. 252.69 cm³, P < 0.001). Preoperative splenic volume and spleen volume/SLV ratio negatively correlated with KGR (r = -0.240, P = 0.027; r = -0.218, P = 0.041). Multivariate analysis identified splenic volume (OR = 0.991, P = 0.043), platelet count (OR = 1.014, P = 0.013), Indocyanine Green Retention Rate at 15 min (ICG-R15) (OR = 0.670, P = 0.010), and CNLC stage (P = 0.001) as independent predictors of FLR regeneration. ROC analysis showed that splenic volume > 265.29 cm³ (AUC = 0.645) and spleen volume/SLV ratio > 0.1997 (AUC = 0.646) predicted poor FLR hypertrophy. One- and two-year survival rates were 80.77% and 68.18%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative splenic volume is an independent predictor of FLR regeneration after ALPPS. Combined evaluation of splenic volume, platelet count, and liver function may improve patient selection, reduce the risk of postoperative liver failure, and optimize surgical outcomes.

Intraoperative Hemodynamic Monitoring and Prediction of Early Allograft Dysfunction Following Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Multiple intraoperative hemodynamic parameters are associated with an increased risk of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, there is significant center-to-center variability in terms of which parameters are used. We sought to determine which intraoperative hemodynamic parameters are most predictive of EAD following LDLT.

METHODS

This is a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023409711). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to compare predictive parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 4399 articles were identified from 3 large, international databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science). Eighteen articles fit the inclusion criteria. The most commonly evaluated hemodynamic parameter was the postreperfusion portal venous pressure (PVP). A postreperfusion PVP of <15-20 mmHg was consistently associated with lower rates of EAD and, in some cases, improvements in patient survival. Other hemodynamic parameters evaluated included portal venous flow, hepatic arterial flow, portal venous velocities, and the hyperperfusion index.

CONCLUSION

Hemodynamic measurements indicative of portal hyperperfusion, especially elevated PVP, have been consistently associated with the development of EAD. Intraoperative hemodynamics should be monitored on all LDLT recipients, with portal inflow modulation procedures indicated if portal hyperperfusion is present.

Graft inflow modulation in recipients with portal hypertension

The extended application of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has revealed the problem of graft size mismatching, potentially leading to the "small-for-size syndrome" (SFSS). SFSS is a rare dysfunction that may affect a partial liver graft, characterized by coagulopathy, cholestasis, ascites, and encephalopathy. A key role in the physiopathology of SFSS is played by portal hypertension (PHT) to which a small allograft is submitted after reperfusion, resulting in sinusoidal congestion and hemorrhage. Portal overflow injures the liver directly through nutrient excess, endothelial activation, and sinusoidal shear stress, and indirectly through arterial vasoconstriction. Thus, SFSS prevention relies not only on increasing graft volume (implementing the use of larger grafts or auxiliary/dual liver transplantation), but also on the control of the increased portal vein pressure (PVP) and portal vein flow (PVF). To this aim, surgical graft inflow modulation techniques (GIM) such as splenic artery ligation (SAL), splenectomy and hemiportocaval shunts, can be considered when an imbalance between the PVP and the hepatic arterial flow (HAF) is acknowledged. However, such strategies have their pros and cons, and a deep knowledge of the indications and complications is needed. Furthermore, pharmacological modulation has also been proposed. This review is aimed to update available literature on the current knowledge and strategies for modulating portal vein flow in LDLT.

Increased Risk of Short-Term Infection After Liver Transplantation Combined With Splenectomy: Clinical Retrospective Study

AIM

The safety of liver transplantation and simultaneous splenectomy (LTSP) is still controversial. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes and infection in liver transplant recipients with and without simultaneous splenectomy.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) from May 2015 to March 2023 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. The main parameters measured were culture results, infection incidence, pathogens, postoperative complications, and overall survival rates.

RESULTS

Of 149 patients, 35 who underwent LTSP were assigned to the LTSP group, and the remaining 114 were assigned to the LT group. The postoperative infection incidence in the LTSP group was significantly higher than in the LT group within 1 month after transplantation. The two groups had no significant differences in pathogens details and overall survival rate. SP, postoperative days (POD) 3 Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), POD 7 NLR, and POD 7 Hemoglobin (HGB) were independent risk factors for postoperative infection in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

LTSP increases the risk of short-term postoperative infections, and postoperative NLR can be used as a marker of infection.

What Are Risk Factors for Graft Loss in Patients Who Underwent Simultaneous Splenectomy During Living-donor Liver Transplantation?

BACKGROUND

The consensus that portal venous pressure modulation, including splenectomy (Spx), prevents portal hypertension-related complications after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been established. However, little evidence about the risk factors for graft loss after simultaneous Spx during LDLT is available. This study aimed to identify the independent predictors of graft loss after simultaneous Spx during LDLT.

METHODS

Data of 655 recipients who underwent LDLT between 1997 and 2021 were collected and separated into the simultaneous Spx group (n = 461) and no-Spx group (n = 194).

RESULTS

The simultaneous Spx group had significantly lower serum total bilirubin levels, drained ascites volumes, and prothrombin time-international normalized ratios on postoperative day 14 than the no-Spx group ( P  < 0.001 for each). Incidences of small-for-size graft syndrome ( P  < 0.001), acute cellular rejection ( P  = 0.002), and sepsis ( P  = 0.007) were significantly lower in the Spx group. Graft survival of the Spx group was significantly better than that of the no-Spx group ( P  < 0.001; hazard ratio [HR], 1.788; 95% confidence interval, 1.214-2.431). A multivariate analysis revealed that 3 variables, platelet count ≤4.0 × 10 4 /mm 3 ( P  = 0.029; HR, 2.873), donor age ≥60 y old ( P  = 0.013; HR, 6.693), and portal venous pressure at closure ≥20 mm Hg ( P  = 0.010; HR, 3.891), were independent predictors of graft loss within 6 mo after simultaneous Spx during LDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Spx is a safe inflow modulation procedure with a positive impact on both postoperative complications and prognosis for most patients. However, patients with the 3 aforementioned independent factors could experience graft loss after LDLT.

Indications and results of right-lobe living donor liver transplantation

The shortage of deceased liver donor organs over the years has always posed the need to expand the donor pool. A viable alternative to deceased donors is that of the living donor. Indeed, the living donor in liver transplantation, initially in pediatric transplantation, but for several years now also in adult transplantation, is a more than viable alternative to deceased liver donation. In fact, right liver lobe donation has proven to be a surgical procedure with low impact on the donor's life in terms of morbidity and mortality, with excellent results in recipients of such organs. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have been published that show excellent results in right-lobe living donor liver transplantation, encouraging this practice not only in countries that have historically had a shortage of deceased donor organs, such as Asian countries, but making it a practice of increasing use in Western countries as well. In addition, thanks to improvements in surgical technique and the experience of high-volume centers, this surgery has also begun to be performed using minimally invasive surgical techniques, allowing us to envision ever better outcomes for both donor and recipient in the coming years.

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.

Preventing Small-for-size Syndrome in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-recognized complication following liver transplantation (LT), with up to 20% developing this following living donor LT (LDLT). Preventing SFSS involves consideration of factors before the surgical procedure, including donor and recipient selection, and factors during the surgical procedure, including adequate outflow reconstruction, graft portal inflow modulation, and management of portosystemic shunts. International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplant Society of India Consensus Conference was convened in January 2023 to develop recommendations for the prediction and management of SFSS in LDLT. The format of the conference was based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. International experts in this field were allocated to 4 working groups (diagnosis, prevention, anesthesia, and critical care considerations, and management of established SFSS). The working groups prepared evidence-based recommendations to answer-specific questions considering the currently available literature. The working group members, independent panel, and conference attendees served as jury to edit and confirm the final recommendations presented at the end of the conference by each working group separately. This report presents the final statements and evidence-based recommendations provided by working group 2 that can be implemented to prevent SFSS in LDLT patients.

Volume and flow modulation strategies to mitigate post-hepatectomy liver failure

INTRODUCTION

Post hepatectomy liver failure is the most common cause of death following major hepatic resections with a perioperative mortality rate between 40% to 60%. Various strategies have been devised to increase the volume and function of future liver remnant (FLR). This study aims to review the strategies used for volume and flow modulation to reduce the incidence of post hepatectomy liver failure.

METHOD

An electronic search was performed of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases from 2000 to 2022 using the following search strategy "Post hepatectomy liver failure", "flow modulation", "small for size flow syndrome", "portal vein embolization", "dual vein embolization", "ALPPS" and "staged hepatectomy" to identify all articles published relating to this topic.

RESULTS

Volume and flow modulation strategies have evolved over time to maximize the volume and function of FLR to mitigate the risk of PHLF. Portal vein with or without hepatic vein embolization/ligation, ALPPS, and staged hepatectomy have resulted in significant hypertrophy and kinetic growth of FLR. Similarly, techniques including portal flow diversion, splenic artery ligation, splenectomy and pharmacological agents like somatostatin and terlipressin are employed to reduce the risk of small for size flow syndrome SFSF syndrome by decreasing portal venous flow and increasing hepatic artery flow at the same time.

CONCLUSION

The current review outlines the various strategies of volume and flow modulation that can be used in isolation or combination in the management of patients at risk of PHLF.

Up-regulated LRRN2 expression as a marker for graft quality in living donor liver transplantation

The quality and size of liver grafts are critical factors that influence living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) function and safety. However, the biomarkers used for predicting graft quality are lacking. In this study, we sought to identify unique graft quality markers, aside from donor age, by using the livers of non-human primates. Hepatic gene microarray expression data from young and elderly cynomolgus macaques revealed a total of 271 genes with significantly increased expression in the elderly. These candidate genes were then narrowed down to six through bioinformatics analyses. The expression patterns of these candidate genes in human donor liver tissues were subsequently examined. Importantly, we found that grafts exhibiting up-regulated expression of these six candidate genes were associated with an increased incidence of liver graft failure. Multivariable analysis further revealed that up-regulated expression of LRRN2 (encoding leucine-rich repeat protein, neuronal 2) in donor liver tissue served as an independent risk factor for graft failure (odds ratio 4.50, confidence interval 2.08-9.72). Stratification based on graft expression of LRRN2 and donor age was also significantly associated with 6-month graft survival rates. Conclusion: Up-regulated LRRN2 expression of liver graft is significantly correlated with graft failure in LDLT. In addition, combination of graft LRRN2 expression and donor age may represent a promising marker for predicting LDLT graft quality.

Does modification of portal pressure and flow enhance recovery of the recipient after living donor liver transplantation? A systematic review of literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

Portal inflow modulation (PIM) aimed at reducing portal hyperperfusion is commonly used in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to reduce the risk of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). Many different techniques, both pharmacological and surgical have been used for this purpose. There is, however, little consensus on the best method of PIM, its exact role in preventing SFSS and on early post-LDLT recovery.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether modifications of portal pressures and flows enhance recovery after LDLT and to provide international expert panel recommendations.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.

METHODS

Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42021260997.

RESULTS

Five hundred and ninety four articles were identified through databases' search. Of the 24 included for a final review by the working group (WG), there were five randomized control trials, four prospective studies and 15 retrospective series. Six outcome measures which were likely to influence early recovery after LDLT, especially in small-for-size grafts (SFSG) were shortlisted. These included acute kidney injury, SFSS, morbidity including sepsis, length of ICU and hospital stay, morbidity of the PIM technique and overall mortality. The WG noted that PIM in this subset of LDLT recipients had a beneficial effect on all the outcomes measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering all decision domains, the panel recommends pre- and intraoperative actual graft weight validation, portal pressure/flow measurements, and a comprehensive donor evaluation for the determination of potentially small-for-size/ small-for-flow grafts as mandatory. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) Pharmacological PIM helps improve early renal function in LDLT recipients. (Quality of Evidence: High | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In selected patients with SFSG, PIM helps reduce SFSS/EAD and sepsis. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) PIM in the form of splenectomy has increased morbidity compared to splenic artery ligation (SAL). (Quality of Evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In LDLT recipients with SFSG, PIM may help reduce morbidity/mortality. (Quality of Evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In LDLT recipients with SFSG, modification of portal pressures and flows enhances recovery after LDLT. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong).

Small-For-Size Syndrome and Graft Inflow Modulation Techniques in Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Partial liver transplantation has recently been proposed to alleviate organ shortages. However, transplantation of a small-for-size graft is associated with an increased risk of posttransplant hepatic dysfunction, commonly referred to as small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). This review describes the etiology, pathological features, clinical manifestations, and diagnostic criteria of SFSS. Moreover, we summarize strategies to improve graft function, focusing on graft inflow modulation techniques. Finally, unmet needs and future perspectives are discussed.

SUMMARY

In fact, posttransplant SFSS can be attributed to various factors such as preoperative status of the recipients, surgical techniques, donor age, and graft quality, except for graft size. With targeted improvement measures, satisfactory clinical outcomes can be achieved in recipients at increased risk of SFSS. Given the critical role of relative portal hyperperfusion in the pathogenesis of SFSS, various pharmacological and surgical treatments have been established to reduce or partially divert excessive portal inflow, and recipients will benefit from individualized therapeutic regimens after careful evaluation of benefits against potential risks. However, there remain unmet needs for further research into different aspects of SFSS to better understand the correlation between portal hemodynamics and patient outcomes.

KEY MESSAGES

Contemporary transplant surgeons should consider various donor and recipient factors and develop case-specific prevention and treatment strategies to improve graft and recipient survival rates.

Portocaval shunt can optimize transhepatic flow following extended hepatectomy: a short-term study in a porcine model

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the portocaval shunt (PCS) corrects these unwanted changes in transhepatic flow after extended hepatectomy (EH). Forty female Landrace pigs were divided into two main groups: (A) EH (75%) and (B) no EH. Group A was divided into 3 subgroups: (A1) EH without PCS; (A2) EH with side-to-side PCS; and (A3) EH with end-to-side PCS. Group B was divided into 2 subgroups: (B1) side-to-side PCS and (B2) end-to-side PCS. HAF, PVF, and PVP were measured in each animal before and after the surgical procedure. EH increased the PVF/100 g (173%, p < 0.001) and PVP (68%, p < 0.001) but reduced the HAF/100 g (22%, p = 0.819). Following EH, side-to-side PCS reduced the increased PVF (78%, p < 0.001) and PVP (38%, p = 0.001). Without EH, side-to-side PCS reduced the PVF/100 g (68%, p < 0.001) and PVP (12%, p = 0.237). PVP was reduced by end-to-side PCS following EH by 48% (p < 0.001) and without EH by 21% (p = 0.075). PCS can decrease and correct the elevated PVP and PVF/100 g after EH to close to the normal values prior to resection. The decreased HAF/100 g in the remnant liver following EH is increased and corrected through PCS.

Outcomes of Infection and Risk of Mortality in Liver Transplant Patients with Simultaneous Splenectomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of infection between liver transplant patients with and without simultaneous splenectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 211 patients who underwent liver transplantation in the Tri-Service General Hospital from 2012 to 2017. The frequency of blood cultures obtained after liver transplantation; incidence of bacteremia, pathogens, and complications; and overall survival rates were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-three of 211 patients underwent liver transplantation without simultaneous splenectomy. There were no significant differences in the frequency of blood cultures obtained after liver transplantation (non-splenectomy group and splenectomy group: 63% and 62%, respectively); incidences of bacteremia after liver transplantation (21% and 21%, respectively), repeat bacteremia (39% and 35%, respectively), cytomegalovirus infection (4% and 3%, respectively), herpes infection (6% and 7%, respectively), and fungal infection (3% and 3%, respectively); and overall survival rate between the two groups. However, there was a significant difference in infection-related deaths between the groups. Simultaneous splenectomy and episodes of antibody-related rejection were significant risk factors associated with infection-related death in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

Although simultaneous splenectomy does not increase the incidence of infection, simultaneous splenectomy definitely carries risks of infection-related mortality in liver transplantation.

Congestion Area of the Right Lobe Graft in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Quantitative Evaluation of Hemodynamics Using Computed Tomography Perfusion

BACKGROUND

The hemodynamics of congestion areas in the right lobe graft after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to elucidate the hemodynamics of congestion areas in the right lobe graft after LDLT using computed tomography (CT) perfusion imaging and the dual-input maximum slope method.

METHODS

Sixteen recipients underwent CT perfusion of the liver and portal phase abdominal to pelvic CT 1week after LDLT using a right lobe graft. The attenuation of segments V and VIII on the portal venous phase abdominal to the pelvic CT scan was classified into 3 categories: hyperattenuation, iso-attenuation, and hypoattenuation. Mean arterial blood flow (AF, mL/min/100 mL tissue), portal blood flow (PF, mL/min/100 mL tissue), and perfusion index (%) [PI = AF/(AF + PF) × 100] were compared between the hyperattenuation group and iso-attenuation group. The independent t test was used for these statistical analyses.

RESULTS

On the portal phase abdominal scan, 15 segments, 16 segments, and 1 segment showed hyperattenuation, iso-attenuation, and hypoattenuation, respectively. The mean AF and PI of the hyperattenuation group (44.4 ± 24.4, 30.2 ± 13.5) were significantly higher than those of the iso-attenuation group (28.0 ± 7.8, 19.9 ± 6.2) (P < .05, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The congested liver segments showed high AF and high PI on CT perfusion imaging. This method enables the feasible quantification of the hemodynamics and the description of focal hemodynamic change in the graft after LDLT.

The Significant Prognostic Factors in Prolonged Intensive/High Care Unit Stay After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Prolonged stay in an intensive/high care unit (ICU/HCU) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a significant event with possible mortality.

METHODS

Adult-to-adult LDLTs (n = 283) were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the factors attributed to the prolonged ICU/HCU stay after LDLT.

RESULTS

Recipients who stayed in the ICU/HCU 9 days or longer were defined as the prolonged group. The prolonged group was older (P = .0010), had a higher model for end-stage liver disease scores (P < .0001), and had higher proportions of patients with preoperative hospitalization (P < .0001). Delirium (P < .0001), pulmonary complications (P < .0001), sepsis (P < .0001), reintubation or tracheostomy (P < .0001), relaparotomy due to bleeding (P = .0015) or other causes (P < .0001), and graft dysfunction (P < .0001) were associated with prolonged ICU/HCU stay. Only sepsis (P = .015) and graft dysfunction (P = .019) were associated with in-hospital mortality among patients with prolonged ICU/HCU stay or graft loss within 9 days of surgery. Among these patients, grafts from donors aged <42 years and with a graft-to-recipient weight ratio of >0.76% had significantly higher graft survival than grafts from others (P = .0013 and P < .0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Prolonged ICU/HCU stay after LDLT was associated with worse short-term outcomes. The use of grafts of sufficient volume from younger donors might improve graft survival.

Simultaneous splenectomy improves outcomes after adult living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Small-for-size graft (SFSG) syndrome is a major cause of graft loss after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Splenectomy (Spx) is an option to prevent this catastrophic complication, but its effect remains controversial. Herein, we aimed to elucidate the effect of simultaneous Spx on graft function and long-term outcomes after LDLT.

METHODS

Three hundred and twenty patients were divided into 2 groups: those undergoing (n = 258) and those not undergoing (n = 62) simultaneous Spx. To overcome selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed (n = 50 in each group).

RESULTS

Before PSM, recipients undergoing simultaneous Spx showed better graft function on post-operative day (POD) 7 and 14, as well as lower sepsis frequency within 6 months after LDLT and better graft survival rates compared to those not undergoing Spx. After PSM, compared to patients not undergoing Spx, those undergoing Spx had a lower frequency of early graft dysfunction on POD 7 (p = 0.04); a lower frequency of SFSG syndrome (p = 0.01), lower serum total bilirubin levels (p = 0.001), and lower international normalized ratio (p = 0.004) on POD 14; lower sepsis frequency within 6 months after LDLT (p = 0.02), and better graft survival rates (p = 0.04). Univariate analysis revealed that not undergoing Spx (hazard ratio 3.06; 95% CI 1.07-11.0; p = 0.037) was the only risk factor for graft loss after LDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous Spx may prevent SFSG syndrome and is a predictive factor for graft survival after LDLT. Simultaneous Spx is recommended when a small graft (≤35% of standard liver weight) is predicted preoperatively, or for patients with portal hypertension or high portal pressure (above 20 mmHg) after reperfusion in LDLT.

LAY SUMMARY

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for patients with acute or chronic liver failure is an alternative to overcome the deceased donor shortage. The potential mismatch between graft and body size is a problem that needs to be solved for LDLT recipients. Herein, we evaluated the impact of simultaneous splenectomy and showed that it was associated with favorable outcomes in patients undergoing LDLT.

Fatal intracardiac and pulmonary arterial thromboembolic damage following ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis: A case report

RATIONALE

We present the case of a patient with autoimmune hepatitis who suffered fatal intracardiac and pulmonary arterial thromboembolic complications after ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABOi LDLT) with splenectomy.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 46-year-old female (blood type B+) with autoimmune hepatitis and hepatitis B carrier status underwent elective ABOi LDLT. The donor liver was from a 51-year-old male living donor (blood type A+). A splenectomy was performed without bleeding complications. Intraoperatively, the patients hemodynamic condition was acceptable, with no evidence of thromboembolism on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).

DIAGNOSIS

Postoperatively, her platelet count increased from 15.0 to 263.0 (× 109/L) and thromboelastographic parameters indicated hypercoagulable state. She suffered acute circulatory collapse, respiratory distress and, eventually, a decline in mental status. The attending physicians in the intensive care unit (ICU) immediately performed resuscitation.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent emergency exploratory surgery. Intraoperatively, hypotension, bradycardia and arrhythmia developed, together with high central venous pressure. Assessment of cardiac structure and function using rescue TEE incidentally identified multiple, huge thromboembolic clots in the cardiac chambers; therefore, the patient underwent cardiac thromboembolectomy, including cardiopulmonary bypass with hypothermia therapy.

OUTCOMES

Due to severe cardiac and respiratory distress, the patient required venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VAECMO) in the operating room and ICU. Despite continuous resuscitation in the ICU and maintenance of VAECMO, she suffered severe hypotension and massive bleeding that eventually led to death.

LESSONS

In patients with autoimmune hepatitis, risk factors for thromboembolism should be rigorously controlled during the peak period of reactive thrombocytosis after ABOi LDLT with splenectomy.

Pretransplantation splenomegaly frequently persists after liver transplantation and can manifest as hypersplenism and graft fibrosis - a retrospective study

The risk factors and clinical impact of post-transplantation splenomegaly (SM) are poorly understood. We investigated the predictors and impacts of post-transplantation SM in 415 LT patients at Kyoto University Hospital from April 2006 to December 2015. First, the predictors and clinical consequences of SM three years post-transplantation were analyzed among spleen-preserved recipients. Second, the clinical data of surviving recipients three years post-transplantation were compared between splenectomized and spleen-preserved recipients. There was no difference in indication for liver transplantation between these two groups. Third, survival outcomes were compared between splenectomized and spleen-preserved recipients. SM was determined as a SV/body surface area (BSA) higher than 152 ml/m² . In the first analysis, preoperative SM occurred in 79.9% recipients and SM persisted three years post-transplantation in 72.6% recipients among them. Preoperative SV/BSA was the only independent predictor of three year post-transplantation SM, which was associated with lower platelet (PLT), white blood cell (WBC) counts and significant graft fibrosis (21.4% vs. 2.8%). In the second analysis, spleen-preservation was related to lower PLT, WBC counts and a higher proportion of significant graft fibrosis (26.7% vs. 7.1%) three years post-transplantation. In the third analysis, spleen-preserved recipients showed worse survival than splenectomized recipients. In conclusion, preoperative SM frequently persists more than three years post-transplantation and is associated with subclinical hypersplenism, graft fibrosis, graft loss, and even death.

Elective staged proctocolectomy and living donor liver transplantation for colon cancer with sclerosing cholangitis-related ulcerative colitis: a case report

Background

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a well-known complication of ulcerative colitis (UC), but it is rare to encounter patients requiring both living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and proctocolectomy. We report a case of elective two-stage surgery involving proctocolectomy performed after LDLT for a patient with early colon cancer concurrent with PSC-related UC. To our knowledge, this is the first report of concurrent cancer successfully treated with both LDLT and proctocolectomy.

Case presentation

A 32-year-old Japanese man with colon cancer associated with UC underwent restorative proctocolectomy at 3 months after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for PSC. He was diagnosed with PSC and UC when he was a teenager. Conservative therapy was initiated to treat both PSC and UC. He had experienced recurrent cholangitis for years; therefore, a biliary stent was placed endoscopically. However, his liver function progressively deteriorated. Colonoscopic surveillance revealed early colon cancer; hence, surgical treatment was considered. PSC progressed to cirrhosis and portal hypertension; hence, LDLT was performed before restorative proctocolectomy. Three months after LDLT, we performed restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient was well, with good liver and bowel functions and without tumor recurrence, more than 1 year after proctocolectomy.

Conclusions

With strict patient selection and careful patient management and follow-up, elective proctocolectomy may be performed safely and effectively after LDLT for concurrent early colon cancer with PSC-related UC. There are no previous reports of the use of both LDLT and proctocolectomy for the successful treatment of PSC-related UC and concurrent cancer.

Treatment options for sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation of spleen

BACKGROUND

To summarise the clinical features of Sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation (SANT) of the spleen and to compare the efficacy of three different surgical treatments.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with SANT of spleen treated at our center from 2009 to 2018. We compared the efficacy and safety of three different types of surgical procedures. ANOVA and the chi-square test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients were included. Most (35/37; 94.6%) were asymptomatic. A number presented as obscure boundary lesions such that malignancy could not be excluded. Open splenectomy was performed for 12 patients, laparoscopic splenectomy for 12 patients and laparoscopic partial splenectomy for 13 patients. Operation time (P = 0.355), blood loss (P = 0.135), length of hospital stay after operation (P = 0.271) and postoperative complications (P = 0.502) were comparable between the three groups. Duration of drainage tube placement was significantly longer in laparoscopic partial splenectomy patients (P = 0.006). Peak platelet count after operation was significantly lower in laparoscopic partial splenectomy patients (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy appears to be a technically feasible and therapeutically effective approach for SANT.

Small-for-size graft, small-for-size syndrome and inflow modulation in living donor liver transplantation

The extended application of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has revealed the problem of graft size mismatching called "small-for-size syndrome (SFSS)." The initial trials to resolve this problem involved increasing the procured graft size, from left to right, and even extending to include a right lobe graft. Clinical cases of living right lobe donations have been reported since then, drawing attention to the risks of increasing the liver volume procured from a living donor. However, not only other modes of increasing graft volume (GV) such as auxiliary or dual liver transplantation, but also control of the increased portal pressure caused by a small-for-size graft (SFSG), such as a porto-systemic shunt or splenectomy and optimal outflow reconstruction, have been trialed with some positive results. To establish an effective strategy for transplanting SFSG and preventing SFSS, it is essential to have precise knowledge and tactics to evaluate graft quality and GV, when performing these LDLTs with portal pressure control and good venous outflow. Thus, we reviewed the updated literature on the pathogenesis of and strategies for using SFSG.

Small-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation: Definition, pathophysiology and management

BACKGROUND

Since the first success in an adult patient, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become an universally used procedure. Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-known complication after partial LT, especially in cases of adult-to-adult LDLT. The definition of SFSS slightly varies among transplant physicians. The use of a partial liver graft has risks of SFSS development. Persistent portal vein (PV) hypertension and PV hyper-perfusion after LT were identified as the main factors. Hence, various approaches were explored to modulate PV flow and decrease PV pressure in order to alleviate this syndrome. Herein, the definition, clinical symptoms, pathophysiology, basic research, as well as preventive and treatment strategies for SFSS are reviewed based on an extensive review of the literature and on our own experiences.

DATA SOURCES

The articles were collected through PubMed using search terms "liver transplantation", "living donor liver transplantation", "living liver donation", "partial graft", "small-for-size graft", "small-for-size syndrome", "graft volume", "remnant liver", "standard liver volume", "graft to recipient body weight ratio", "sarcopenia", "porcine", "swine", and "rat". English publications published before March 31, 2020 were included in this review.

RESULTS

Many transplant surgeons performed PV flow modulation, including portocaval shunt, splenic artery ligation and splenectomy. With these techniques, patient outcome has been improved even when using a "small" graft. Other factors, such as preoperative recipients' nutritional and skeletal muscle status, graft congestion, and donor factors, were also identified as risk factors which all have been addressed using various strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical approach controlling PV flow and pressure could help to prevent SFSS especially in severely ill recipients. In the absence of efficacious medications to resolve SFSS, conservative treatments, including aggressive fluid balance correction for massive ascites, anti-microbiological therapy to prevent or control sepsis and intensive nutritional therapy, are all required if SFSS could not be prevented.

Living donor liver transplantation in small-for-size setting

Small-for-Size Syndrome (SFSS) is one of the most feared complication of adult split liver and living donor liver transplantation. SFSS stems from a disproportionate/excessive portal vein flow relative to the volume of the implanted liver graft, and is currently one of the major practical limits to partial liver grafts' transplantation. In the last few decades many graft inflow modulation (GIM) techniques have been proposed to curtail the portal vein flow, allowing for successful transplantation of small partial liver grafts. Graft inflow modulation techniques span from Splenic Artery Ligation (SAL), to Splenectomy, Porto-Systemic Shunts and the lately proposed Splenic Devascularization. A patient tailored approach balancing the risk of SFSS with GIM specific morbidity, is more important than identifying the ideal GIM technique. Here we summarize the most recently published data to provide general indications in the challenging preoperative choice of a GIM techniques.

Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation

Background

To treat small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), many procedures were described for portal flow modulation before, during, or after transplantation. The selection of the procedure as well as the best timing remains controversial.

Case presentation

A 43-year-old female with end-stage liver disease underwent LDLT with extended left with caudate lobe graft from her donor who was her 41-year-old brother (graft volume/standard liver volume (GV/SLV), 35.7%; graft to recipient weight ratio (GRWR), 0.67%). During the surgery, splenectomy could not be performed owing to severe peri-splenic adhesions to avoid the ruined bleedings. The splenic artery ligation was not also completely done because it was dorsal to the pancreas and difficult to be approached. Finally, adequate portal vein (PV) inflow was confirmed after portal venous thrombectomy. As having post-transplant optional procedures that are accessible for PV flow modulation, any other procedures for PV modulation during LDLT were not done until the postoperative assessment of the graft function and PV flow for possible postoperative modulation of the portal flow accordingly. Postoperative PV flow kept as high as 30 cm/s. By the end of the 1st week, there was a progressive deterioration of the total bilirubin profile (peak as 19.4 mg/dL) and ascitic fluid amount exceeded 1000 mL/day. Therefore, splenic artery embolization was done effectively and safely on the 10th postoperative day (POD) to reverse early allograft dysfunction as PV flow significantly decreased to keep within 20 cm/s and serum total bilirubin levels gradually declined with decreased amounts of ascites below 500 mL on POD 11 and thereafter. The patient was discharged on POD 28 with good condition.

Conclusions

SFSS can be prevented or reversed by the portal inflow modulation, even by post-transplant procedure. This case emphasizes that keeping accessible angiographic treatment options for PV modulation, such as splenic artery embolization, after LDLT is quite feasible.

Associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy: a review

Outcomes of liver resection have improved with advances in surgical techniques, improvements in critical care and expansion of resectability criteria. However, morbidity and mortality following liver resection continue to plague surgeons. Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) due to inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality following liver resection. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a novel two-staged procedure described in 2012, which aims to induce rapid hypertrophy of the FLR unlike conventional two-stage hepatectomy, which require a longer time for FLR hypertrophy. Careful patient selection and modifications in surgical technique has improved morbidity and mortality rates in ALPPS. Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) confers the best outcomes post-ALPPS. Patients <60 years old and low-grade fibrosis with underlying hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are also eligible for ALPPS. Evidence for other types of cancers is less promising. Current studies, though limited, demonstrate that ALPPS has comparable oncological outcomes with conventional two-stage hepatectomy. Modifications such as partial-ALPPS and mini-ALPPS have shown improved morbidity and mortality compared to classic ALPPS. ALPPS may be superior to conventional two-stage hepatectomy in carefully selected groups of patients and has a promising outlook in liver surgery.

Risk factors for the metabolic syndrome components of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia after living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is the most common long-term complication after liver transplantation, and it has been increasing in incidence. The aim of this study was to clarify the risk factors for each MS component -hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia-after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), including characteristics of living-donors.

METHODS

Data related to clinicopathological parameters including MS components in 461 consecutive patients who underwent LDLT were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Prevalence of all MS components (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia) increased from 9.3%, 16.5%, and 7.2% before LDLT to 44.9%, 45.3%, and 50.8% after LDLT, respectively. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, the three factors, cyclosporine use (OR 2.086, P = 0.001), recipient age (OR 1.036, P = 0.001), and BMI (OR 1.072, P = 0.026) were independent predictors for post-LDLT hypertension. Next, the three factors, male recipient (OR 2.471, P < 0.001), recipient age (OR 1.039, P = 0.002), and donor BMI (OR 1.124, P = 0.012) were independent for post-LDLT diabetes mellitus. The four factors, cyclosporine use (OR 2.015, P = 0.001), prolonged prednisolone use (OR 1.928, P = 0.002), recipient age (OR 1.019, P = 0.037), and GRWR (OR 0.316, P = 0.037) were independent for post-LDLT dyslipidemia as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only recipient-related factors but also donor-related factors were independently associated with each targeted post-LDLT MS component.

A systematic review of small for size syndrome after major hepatectomy and liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Major hepatectomy (MH) and particular types of liver transplantation (LT) (reduced size graft, living-donor and split-liver transplantation) lead to a reduction in liver mass. As the portal venous return remains the same it results in a reciprocal and proportionate rise in portal venous pressure potentially resulting in small for size syndrome (SFSS). The aim of this study was to review the incidence, diagnosis and management of SFSS amongst recipients of LT and MH.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with the 2010 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The following terms were used to search PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library in July 2019: ("major hepatectomy" or "liver resection" or "liver transplantation") AND ("small for size syndrome" or "post hepatectomy liver failure"). The primary outcome was a diagnosis of SFSS.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles met the inclusion criteria and could be included in this review. In total 2728 patients were included of whom 316 (12%) patients met criteria for SFSS or post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Of these, 31 (10%) fulfilled criteria for PHLF following MH. 8 of these patients developed intractable ascites alongside elevated portal venous pressure following MH indicative of SFSS.

CONCLUSION

SFSS is under-recognised following major hepatectomy and should be considered as an underlying cause of PHLF. Surgical and pharmacological therapies are available to reduce portal congestion and reverse SFSS.

Impact of Having a Planned Additional Operation at Time of Liver Transplant on Graft and Patient Outcomes

Advances in liver transplantation (LT) have allowed for expanded indications and increased surgical complexity. In select cases, additional surgery may be performed at time of LT rather than prior to LT due to the significant risks associated with advanced liver disease. We retrospectively studied the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent an additional planned abdominal or cardiac operation at time of LT between 2011–2019. An additional operation (LT+) was defined as a planned operation performed under the same anesthetic as the LT but not directly related to the LT. In total, 547 patients were included in the study, of which 20 underwent LT+ (4%). Additional operations included 10 gastrointestinal, 5 splenic, 3 cardiac, and 2 other abdominal operations. Baseline characteristics between LT and LT+ groups were similar. The median total operating time was significantly longer in LT+ compared to LT only (451 vs. 355 min, p = 0.002). Graft and patient survival, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion of blood products, length of hospital stay, and post-operative complications were not significantly different between groups. In carefully selected patients undergoing LT, certain additional operations performed at the same time appear to be safe with equivalent short-term outcomes and liver graft survival as those undergoing LT alone

Conceptual changes in small-for-size graft and small-for-size syndrome in living donor liver transplantation

Early series in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in adults demonstrated a lower safe limit of graft volume standard liver volume ratio 25%–45%. A subsequent worldwide large LDLT series proposed a 0.8 graft recipient weight ratio (GRWR) to define small-for-size graft (SFSG) in adult LDLT. Thereafter, researchers identified innate and inevitable factors including changes in liver volume during imaging studies and graft shrinkage due to perfusion solution. Although the definition of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) advocated in the 2000s was mainly based on prolonged cholestasis and ascites output, the term SFSS was inadequate to describe clinical manifestations possibly caused by multiple factors. Thus, the term “early allograft dysfunction (EAD),” characterized by total bilirubin >10 mg/dL or coagulopathy with international normalized ratio >1.6 on day 7, has become prevalent to describe graft dysfunction including SFSS after LDLT. Although various efforts have been made to overcome EAD in LDLT, graft selection to maintain an expected GRWR >0.8 and full venous drainage, as well as inflow modulation using splenic artery ligation, have become standard in recent LDLT.

Impact of imbalanced graft-to-spleen volume ratio on outcomes following living donor liver transplantation in an era when simultaneous splenectomy is not typically indicated

The impact of an imbalanced graft-to-spleen volume ratio (GSVR) on posttransplant outcomes other than postreperfusion portal hypertension remains unknown. The importance of GSVR might vary according to whether simultaneous splenectomy (SPX) is performed. This retrospective study divided 349 living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients from 2006 to 2017 into 2 groups: low GSVR (≤0.70 g/mL) and normal GSVR (>0.70 g/mL). The cutoff value of GSVR was set based on the first quartile of the distributed data. Graft survival and associations with various clinical factors were investigated between the groups according to whether SPX was performed. Low GSVR did not affect outcomes when SPX was performed. In contrast, it was associated with an increased incidence of early graft loss (EGL) and poor graft survival by presenting posttransplant thrombocytopenia, cholestasis, coagulopathy, and massive ascites when the spleen was preserved. Among patients with a preserved spleen, the multivariable analysis results revealed that older donor age and low GSVR were independent risk factors for graft loss. In conclusion, low GSVR was an independent predictor of graft loss after LDLT when the spleen was preserved. Preserved spleen with extremely low GSVR may be related to persistent hypersplenism, impaired graft function, and consequent EGL.

Portal flow modulation in living donor liver transplantation: review with a focus on splenectomy

Small-for-size graft (SFSG) syndrome after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the dysfunction of a small graft, characterized by coagulopathy, cholestasis, ascites, and encephalopathy. It is a serious complication of LDLT and usually triggered by excessive portal flow transmitted to the allograft in the postperfusion setting, resulting in sinusoidal congestion and hemorrhage. Portal overflow injures the liver directly through nutrient excess, endothelial activation, and sinusoidal shear stress, and indirectly through arterial vasoconstriction. These conditions may be attenuated with portal flow modulation. Attempts have been made to control excessive portal flow to the SFSG, including simultaneous splenectomy, splenic artery ligation, hemi-portocaval shunt, and pharmacological manipulation, with positive outcomes. Currently, a donor liver is considered a SFSG when the graft-to-recipient weight ratio is less than 0.8 or the ratio of the graft volume to the standard liver volume is less than 40%. A strategy for transplanting SFSG safely into recipients and avoiding extensive surgery in the living donor could effectively address the donor shortage. We review the literature and assess our current knowledge of and strategies for portal flow modulation in LDLT.

Immunological consequences following splenectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis

The immune status in patients with liver cirrhosis is generally impaired due to concomitant hypersplenism. As the spleen is the largest lymphoid organ, deleterious events resulting from splenectomy are of concern in these patients. However, the immunological consequences after splenectomy have not yet been fully elucidated. In the present study, the immune status after splenectomy was comprehensively examined. Splenectomy was performed in 11 patients with liver cirrhosis and hypersplenism, and the immune status in peripheral blood was examined and compared before and at 1, 3 and 6 months after splenectomy. Splenectomy significantly lowered the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, due to a surge in lymphocytes in the peripheral circulation at 3 and 6 months after splenectomy. The frequency of cluster of differentiation (CD)4⁺ T cells decreased after splenectomy, whereas the frequency of CD8⁺ T cells increased. Notably, the frequencies of the naïve and central memory subsets of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells decreased, whereas those of the effector memory subset trended upward. In addition, the frequencies of other immune cells such as γδ T cells, natural killer T cells and natural killer cells transiently increased, while inhibitory cells such as regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells significantly decreased. T-cell responses to viral- and tumor-associated antigens increased after splenectomy in five of eight and two of five patients, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to precisely examine the drastic changes of immunological phenotypes in peripheral blood after splenectomy in patients with cirrhosis. Our findings suggested that splenectomy in patients with cirrhosis may ameliorate the impaired immune status, possibly by reducing suppressive cells and enhancing the effector cell population and function, which could, at least in part, explain the mechanisms responsible for the clinical benefits of splenectomy.

Long-term Outcomes and Risk Factors After Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although risk factors for the long-term mortality of liver transplantation are well described, there is a lack of detailed study regarding these factors for adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 528 adult LDLT recipients in our hospital. The risk factors were analyzed for overall deaths more than 5 years post-LDLT.

RESULTS

Over the 20-year follow-up, 137 patients died. Patient survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years post-LDLT was 87.8%, 81.8%, 79.4%, and 72.8%, respectively. The independent risk factors for more than 5 years post-LDLT overall death were hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 38.9; P < 0.001), lymphoid de novo malignancy (HR, 47.2; P = 0.001), primary sclerosing cholangitis as primary diagnosis (HR, 11.5; P < 0.001), chronic rejection (HR, 6.93; P = 0.006), acute rejection (HR, 2.96; P = 0.017), and bile duct stenosis (HR, 2.30; P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Not only malignancies and rejection but also bile duct stenosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis had significant impacts on late period post-LDLT mortality.

Splenic devascularization can replace splenectomy during adult living donor liver transplantation - a historical cohort study

Simultaneous splenectomy (SSPX) in adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) has definitely beneficial roles such as portal flow modulation in small-for-size graft and correction of hypersplenism-related pancytopenia, and so on, but disastrous complications after SSPX often occur. For the first time, we devised unique and innovative splenic devascularization (SDV) procedure to alleviated untoward effects of SSPX but to maintain its benefits for the indicated patients. From April 2013 to December 2014, 520 recipients underwent ALDLT, and the SSPX and SDV were simultaneously performed in 62 (11.9%) and 61 (11.7%) patients, respectively. The most common indication was hypersplenism-related pancytopenia (n = 101), small-for-size graft (n = 14), hepatitis C virus (HCV) (n = 7), and splenic artery aneurysm (n = 1). Postoperative small-for-size graft syndrome (SFSS) was absent in both SSPX and SDV, and preoperative pancytopenia was improved in both groups since postoperative 1 week, although SSPX was more substantial than SDV. Preoperative splenic volume (706.2 ± 282.9 ml) after SDV significantly decreased to 425.5 ± 204.4 ml on 1 month, respectively. In contrast to SDV, SSPX resulted in longer operation time and higher incidence of postoperative complications including mortality. In conclusion, SDV can replace SSPX during ALDLT without hampering its beneficial roles seriously, but get rid of splenectomy-related lethal complication.

Evaluation the efficacy and safety of simultaneous splenectomy in liver transplantation patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous splenectomy during liver transplantation (LT) is debated. The present meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of splenectomy on the outcome of LT patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Wanfang databases for relevant studies published until the date of July 15, 2017. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale judgment. The data were analyzed using RevMan5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies consisting of 2198 patients (892 patients received splenectomy during LT [SPLT group] and 1306 patients received LT only [LT group]) were included in the present meta-analysis. Efficacy analysis revealed that pooled hazard ratio for overall survival (OS) between 2 groups was not significantly different (hazard ratio = 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-1.50). SPLT group had less postoperative rejection (odds ratio [OR] = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.79) and small for size syndrome (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.79). SPLT group had significantly lower preoperative platelet (mean difference [MD] = -17.23, 95% CI: -19.54, -14.91), but significantly higher postoperative platelet (MD = 170.45, 95% CI: 108.33-232.56). Conversely, SPLT group had significant higher preoperative portal pressure (MD = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.75-2.33) and significant lower postoperative portal pressure (MD = -1.17, 95% CI: -2.24, -0.11). Safety analysis revealed that SPLT group had significantly longer operation time (MD = 56.66, 95% CI: 35.96-77.35), more intraoperative blood loss (MD = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.25-1.91), and more intraoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (MD = 3.77, 95% CI: 3.22-4.33). Furthermore, SPLT group had significantly higher incidence of postoperative hemorrhage (OR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.92-4.91), postoperative thrombosis (OR = 3.63, 95% CI: 1.06-12.45), and perioperative infection (OR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.76-3.90). In addition, perioperative mortality was significantly higher in the SPLT group (OR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.31-7.52). Postoperative hospital stay did not differ significantly between 2 groups (OR = -1.75, 95% CI: -3.66-0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Splenectomy benefits LT patients in increasing platelet count. However, splenectomy is a morbid procedure as splenectomy increases operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative RBC transfusion, and postoperative complications. Splenectomy does not improve OS but increase perioperative mortality. Therefore, splenectomy should be performed only in selective patients.

Liver graft-to-spleen volume ratio as a useful predictive factor of the early graft function in children and young adults transplanted for biliary atresia: a retrospective study

A graft volume/standard liver volume ratio (GV/SLV) > 35% or graft/recipient weight ratio (GRWR) > 0.8% has been considered as a standard criteria of graft selection. Even if the graft size meets these selection criteria, small-for-size syndrome can still occur depending on the portal venous flow (PVF). The aim of this study was to identify other factors contributing to portal hyperperfusion and the post-transplant course, focusing on the graft volume-to-spleen volume ratio (GV/SV). Thirty-seven BA patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation were reviewed retrospectively. First, we evaluated the preoperative factors contributing to portal hyperperfusion. Second, we evaluated the factors contributing to post-transplant complications, such as thrombocytopenia, hyperbilirubinemia, and coagulopathy. The GV/SLV was >35% in all cases; however, portal hyperperfusion (≥250 ml/min/100 g graft) was found in 12 recipients (35.3%). Furthermore, although the GRWR was >0.8% in over 90% of cases, portal hyperperfusion was found in 10 recipients (32.3%). In contrast, the GV/SV showed a significant correlation with the PVF after reperfusion. If the GV/SV was <0.88, about 80% of recipients developed portal hyperperfusion. Furthermore, the GV/SV also showed a significant correlation with post-transplant persistent thrombocytopenia and hyperbilirubinemia. The GV/SV < 0.88 predicts portal hyperperfusion, post-transplant persistent thrombocytopenia, and hyperbilirubinemia.

Evaluation of safety of concomitant splenectomy in living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective study

In Asian countries, concomitant splenectomy in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is indicated to modulate the portal vein pressure in the small-sized graft to protect against small for size syndrome. While concomitant splenectomy in deceased donor liver transplantation is almost contraindicated based on Western Reports of increased mortality and morbidity rate due to septic complications, there are few studies about that in LDLT. So, we retrospectively investigated the clinical outcome of adult LDLT at Kyoto University Hospital from July 2010 to July 2016. We divided the patients (n = 164) into those with concomitant splenectomy (n = 88) and those without (n = 76). The splenectomy group showed significantly increased operative time and intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.008, P = 0.0007, respectively), and significantly higher rate of postoperative splenic vein thrombosis and cytomegalovirus infection (P = 0.03, P = 0.016, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the incidence of postoperative hemorrhage (P = 0.06), post-transplant bacteremia (P = 0.38), infection-related mortality rates (P = 0.8), acute rejection (P = 0.87), and patient and graft survival (P = 0.66, P = 0.67 respectively); finally, model for end-stage liver disease score above 30 was an independent predictor for infection-related mortality post-transplant (HR = 5.99, 95% CI = 2.15-16.67, P = 0.001). In conclusion, concomitant splenectomy in LDLT can be safely performed when indicated.

Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells: Physiology and role in liver diseases

Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) are highly specialized endothelial cells representing the interface between blood cells on the one side and hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells on the other side. LSECs represent a permeable barrier. Indeed, the association of 'fenestrae', absence of diaphragm and lack of basement membrane make them the most permeable endothelial cells of the mammalian body. They also have the highest endocytosis capacity of human cells. In physiological conditions, LSECs regulate hepatic vascular tone contributing to the maintenance of a low portal pressure despite the major changes in hepatic blood flow occurring during digestion. LSECs maintain hepatic stellate cell quiescence, thus inhibiting intrahepatic vasoconstriction and fibrosis development. In pathological conditions, LSECs play a key role in the initiation and progression of chronic liver diseases. Indeed, they become capillarized and lose their protective properties, and they promote angiogenesis and vasoconstriction. LSECs are implicated in liver regeneration following acute liver injury or partial hepatectomy since they renew from LSECs and/or LSEC progenitors, they sense changes in shear stress resulting from surgery, and they interact with platelets and inflammatory cells. LSECs also play a role in hepatocellular carcinoma development and progression, in ageing, and in liver lesions related to inflammation and infection. This review also presents a detailed analysis of the technical aspects relevant for LSEC analysis including the markers these cells express, the available cell lines and the transgenic mouse models. Finally, this review provides an overview of the strategies available for a specific targeting of LSECs.

Left lobe living donor liver transplantation in adults: What is the safety limit?

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is the most significant cause of graft loss after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), especially after left lobe (LL) LDLT in adults. The safety limit of applying LL-LDLT in adults without severe SFSS with a high rate of lethality needs to be determined. A total of 207 LL-LDLTs in adults since September 2005 were evaluated to analyze the risk factors for severe SFSS, defined as a serum total bilirubin concentration of ≥20.0 mg/dL after LDLT. Although there were no significant differences in cumulative graft survival after LDLT between medium grafts (graft volume [GV] to standard liver volume [SLV] ratio ≥ 40.0%), small grafts (35.0% ≤ GV/SLV < 40.0%), and extra small grafts (GV/SLV < 35.0%), patients with severe SFSS showed a significantly lower 5-year graft survival rate than those without (42.9% versus 94.3%, respectively; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis for severe SFSS after LL-LDLT showed that donor age of ≥48 years (P = 0.01), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of ≥ 19 (P < 0.01), and end portal venous pressure of ≥19 mm Hg (P = 0.04) were the significant and independent factors for severe SFSS after LL-LDLT. Within such high-risk subgroups of patients with a donor age of ≥48 years or MELD score of ≥ 19 before LDLT, operative blood loss volume of ≥8.0 L was a risk factor for severe SFSS. LL-LDLT in adults could be indicated and provide acceptable outcomes for the combinations of donors aged < 48 years and recipients with a MELD score of <19. Smaller grafts might yield acceptable outcomes in appropriately selected donor-recipient combinations. Liver Transplantation 22 1666-1675 2016 AASLD.

Splenectomy is not indicated in living donor liver transplantation

Simultaneous splenectomy (SPX) is preferentially performed in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to modulate portal flow; increase postoperative platelet count, especially among those with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection; and modulate the immunologic status in ABO-incompatible cases. The negative effects of the procedure, however, are not well established. Records of 395 LDLTs performed at our institution, including 169 (42.8%) patients with simultaneous SPX and 226 (57.2%) patients with spleen preservation, were reviewed with special reference to the simultaneous SPX cases. The most common indication for SPX was HCV-related disease (n = 114), followed by low preoperative platelet count (n = 52), and other reasons (n = 3). Simultaneous splenectomy did not increase the platelet count in the early postoperative period, but the incidence of reoperation for postoperative hemorrhage was increased, mainly at the SPX site, within the first week. In addition, the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of lethal infectious disease were significantly higher in the SPX group, whereas the incidence of small-for-size syndrome was comparable between groups. Finally, SPX was an independent predictor for both postoperative hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] = 2.451; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.285-4.815; P = 0.006) and lethal infectious complication (OR = 3.748; 95% CI = 1.148-14.001; P = 0.03). In conclusion, on the basis of the present findings, we do not recommend simultaneous SPX in LDLT. Liver Transplantation 22 1526-1535 2016 AASLD.

Dysfunction in Patients With Small-for-Size Grafts After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

The relationship between postoperative percentage fall of platelet (PLT) counts and graft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in recipients with small-for-size (SFS) graft has not been fully evaluated. We retrospectively studied 50 adult-to-adult LDLT recipients with a graft-to-recipient weight ratio of <0.8% between 1999 and 2011. Graft dysfunction was defined as the presence of hyperbilirubinemia, coagulopathy, or ascites on 3 consecutive days during the first postoperative week. Each clinical sign of dysfunction was assigned 1 point. Postoperative percentage fall in PLT counts, graft dysfunction score, and postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification were investigated. Overall, 31 patients (62%) exhibited a PLT count fall of more than 50%, and 19 (38%) patients exhibited a PLT count fall of less than 50% at postoperative day (POD) 3. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that at POD 3, the cutoff value of PLT count fall was 56% for a graft dysfunction score of 2 or 3 (sensitivity, 70%; specificity, 63.3%). Fourteen of 20 patients (70%) with a dysfunction score of 2 or 3 and 11 of 30 patients (37%) with a dysfunction score of 0 or 1 showed a fall in PLT count >56% at POD 3 (P = 0.021). Grade 2 to 5 complications were more observed in patients with a dysfunction score of 2 or 3 than in patients with a dysfunction score of 0 or 1 (P < 0.001). The fall of PLT count at POD 3 >56% is an ominous sign that can predict the graft dysfunction after LDLT in recipients with SFS graft.

Impact of splenic artery ligation after major hepatectomy on liver function, regeneration and viability

It was reported that prevention of acute portal overpressure in small-for-size livers by inflow modulation results in a better postoperative outcome. The aim is to investigate the impact of portal blood flow reduction by splenic artery ligation after major hepatectomy in a murine model. Forty-eight rats were subjected to an 85% hepatectomy or 85% hepatectomy and splenic artery ligation. Both groups were evaluated at 24, 48, 72 and 120 post-operative hours: liver function, regeneration and viability. All methods and experiments were carried out in accordance with Coimbra University guidelines. Splenic artery ligation produces viability increase after 24 h, induces a relative decrease in oxidative stress during the first 48 hours, allows antioxidant capacity increment after 24 h, which is reflected in a decrease of half-time normalized liver curve at 48 h and at 72 h and in an increase of mitotic index between 48 h and 72 h. Splenic artery ligation combined with 85% hepatectomy in a murine model, allows portal inflow modulation, promoting an increase in hepatocellular viability and regeneration, without impairing the function, probably by inducing a less marked elevation of oxidative stress at first 48 hours.

Graft selection strategy in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: When both hemiliver grafts meet volumetric criteria

To ensure donor safety in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the left and caudate lobe (LL) is the preferred graft choice. However, patient prognosis may still be poor even if graft volume (GV) selection criteria are met. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of right lobe (RL) donation when the LL graft selection criteria are met. Consecutive donors (n = 135) with preoperative LL graft volumetric GV/standard liver volume (SLV) of ≥35% and RL remnant of ≥35% were retrospectively studied. Patients were divided into 2 groups: LL graft and RL graft. Recipient's body surface area (BSA), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, and the donor's age were higher in the RL group. The donor's BSA and preoperative volumetric GV/SLV of the LL graft were smaller in the RL group. The predicted score (calculated using data for graft size, donor age, MELD score, and the presence of portosystemic shunt, which correlated well with graft function and with 6-month graft survival) of the RL group, was significantly lower if the LL graft were used, but using the actual RL graft improved the score equal to that of the LL group. Six-month and 12-month graft survival rates did not differ between the 2 groups. In patients with a poor prognosis, a larger RL graft improved the predicted score and survival was equal to that of patients who received LL grafts. In conclusion, graft selection by GV, donor age, and recipient MELD score improves outcomes in LDLT. Liver Transplantation 22 914-922 2016 AASLD.