Conversion to everolimus monotherapy in maintenance liver transplantation: feasibility, safety, and impact on renal function

Risk Factors for CMV and BK Infections in an Elderly Veteran Population Following Kidney Transplantation: Implications for Immunosuppression Induction and Management

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK Polyomavirus (BKPyV) are the most common opportunistic pathogens following kidney transplantation. We evaluated 102 patients with a median age of 63 at Edward Hines VA Hospital from November 2020 to December 2022. Our primary interest was the incidence of CMV and BKPyV infections, as well as CMV and BKPyV coinfection. Secondary interests included time to infection, rejection, and graft and patient survival. There were no statistically significant differences in patient age, donor age, race, transplant type, incidence of delayed graft function, or induction in both cohorts (any infection (N = 46) vs. those without (N = 56)). There was a 36% (37/102) incidence of CMV, a 17.6% (18/102) of BKPyV and an 8.8% (9/102) incidence of coinfection. There was a decreased incidence of CMV infection in Basiliximab induction versus antithymocyte globulin (21% and 43%). CMV risk status had no effect on the incidence of CMV infection following transplant. African American recipients had a lower incidence of BKPyV infection (12% vs. 39%), yet a higher incidence was observed in those with high cPRA (50% vs. 14%). Most CMV and/or BKPyV infections occurred within the first six months post-transplant (54%). Immunosuppression management of the elderly should continually be evaluated to reduce opportunistic infections post-transplant.

[Kidney failure after liver transplantation]

One third of cirrhotic patients present impaired kidney function. It has multifactorial causes and has a harmful effect on patients' morbi-mortality before and after liver transplant. Kidney function does not improve in all patients after liver transplantation and liver-transplant recipients are at high risk of developing chronic kidney disease. Causes for renal dysfunction can be divided in three groups: preoperative, peroperative and postoperative factors. To date, there is no consensus for the modality of evaluation the risk for chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation, and for its prevention. In the present review, we describe the outcome of kidney function after liver transplantation, and the prognostic factors of chronic kidney disease to determine a risk stratification for each patient. Furthermore, we discuss therapeutic options to prevent kidney dysfunction in this setting, and highlight the indications of combined liver-kidney transplantation.

Kidney Failure after Liver Transplantation

One-third of patients with cirrhosis present kidney failure (AKI and CKD). It has multifactorial causes and a harmful effect on morbidity and mortality before and after liver transplantation. Kidney function does not improve in all patients after liver transplantation, and liver transplant recipients are at a high risk of developing chronic kidney disease. The causes of renal dysfunction can be divided into three groups: pre-operative, perioperative and post-operative factors. To date, there is no consensus on the modality to evaluate the risk of chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation, or for its prevention. In this narrative review, we describe the outcome of kidney function after liver transplantation, and the prognostic factors of chronic kidney disease in order to establish a risk categorization for each patient. Furthermore, we discuss therapeutic options to prevent kidney dysfunction in this context, and highlight the indications of combined liver–kidney transplantation.

Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus Rescue Treatment After Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation

PURPOSE

Everolimus (EVR) is a derivative of sirolimus with a similar mechanism of action. The safety and efficacy of EVR after pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of EVR as rescue therapy after pediatric LDLT.

METHODS

This study included patients younger than 19 years of age who received EVR after LDLT at our institution. EVR was administered as rescue treatment in addition to tacrolimus. In 21 patients, EVR dose, trough level, outcomes, and adverse effects were assessed.

RESULTS

Original diseases of patients consisted of biliary atresia (n = 11), Alagille syndrome (n = 3), fulminant hepatitis (n = 3), hepatoblastoma (n = 2), and other (n = 2). Mean age at transplant was 2.0 years (range 0.6-6.2 years). Mean age at initial EVR administration was 8.0 years (range 0.9-18.9 years). Indications for EVR use were graft fibrosis (n = 8), refractory acute cellular rejection (n = 5), renal sparing (n = 4), hepatoblastoma (n = 2), and chronic rejection (CR) (n = 2). Mean duration of administration was 17.1 months (range 2.1-60.4 months). Mean dose was 0.5 mg/m² twice daily. Mean EVR trough level was 2.5 ng/mL (range 1.5-5.0 ng/mL). Liver function improved and fibrosis did not progress in all patients with CR. However, 14 patients (67%) experienced adverse effects that required EVR dose reduction or discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

EVR is tolerable for pediatric patients after LDLT with dose adjustment. EVR had a certain effect to relieve progression on CR. Further follow-up is required.

Effect of everolimus rescue therapy for acute cellular rejection following pediatric living donor liver transplantation: Report of one case

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) after pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is often curable with steroid pulse therapy, but a few pediatric patients show steroid-resistant ACR, which is difficult to control. We report the effect of everolimus as a rescue therapy for ACR in a case of pediatric LDLT. The patient was a 11-year-old girl who was admitted due to subacute liver failure of unknown cause. LDLT operation using a modified right liver graft from her mother was performed. The graft-recipient weight ratio was 1.30. The explant liver showed massive hepatic necrosis. The patient recovered uneventfully with immunosuppression using tacrolimus and low-dose steroid. However, at postoperative day (POD) 20, the liver enzyme levels began to increase. The first liver biopsy taken at POD 25 showed moderate ACR with rejection activity index (RAI) score of 7. At that time, steroid pulse therapy was performed, but the patient did not respond and the liver enzyme levels increased further. The second liver biopsy taken at POD 40 showed moderate ACR with RAI score of 7. At this time, everolimus was administered, and soon after that, liver enzyme levels had gradually improved. Currently, the patient is doing well for 44 months to date without any abnormal findings. The maintenance target trough concentrations were tacrolimus 5 ng/ml and everolimus 3 ng/ml. Our case demonstrated the effect of rescue therapy using everolimus for ACR following pediatric LDLT. Further studies are needed to assess the role of everolimus in pediatric liver transplant recipients suffering from ACR.

The SURF (Italian observational study for renal insufficiency evaluation in liver transplant recipients): a post-hoc between-sex analysis

Background

Female sex has been reported as an independent predictor of severe post-liver transplantation (LT) chronic kidney disease. We performed a by sex post-hoc analysis of the SURF study, that investigated the prevalence of renal impairment following LT, aimed at exploring possible differences between sexes in the prevalence and course of post-LT renal damage.

Methods

All patients enrolled in the SURF study were considered evaluable for this sex-based analysis, whose primary objective was to evaluate by sex the proportion of patients with estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73m² at inclusion and follow-up visit.

Results

Seven hundred thirty-eight patients were included in our analysis, 76% males. The proportion of patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² was significantly higher in females at initial study visit (33.3 vs 22.8%; p = 0.005), but also before, at time of transplantation (22.9 vs 14.7%; p = 0.0159), as analyzed retrospectively. At follow-up, such proportion increased more in males than in females (33.9 vs 26.0%, p = 0.04). Mean eGFR values decreased over the study in both sexes, with no significant differences. Statistically significant M/F differences in patient distribution by O’Riordan eGFR levels were observed at time of transplant and study initial visit (p = 0.0005 and 0.0299 respectively), but not at follow-up.

Conclusions

Though the limitation of being performed post-hoc, this analysis suggests potential sex differences in the prevalence of renal impairment before and after LT, encouraging further clinical research to explore such differences more in depth.

SNPs Within the MTOR Gene Are Associated With an Increased Risk of Developing De Novo Diabetes Mellitus Following the Administration of Everolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The impact of immunosuppressive drugs in patients following liver transplantation (LT) is very individual. Despite the multiple beneficial effects of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus (EVR) in LT recipients, some patients do not benefit from EVR administration. We investigated whether the presence of common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the mTOR gene are predictive for adverse events following the introduction of EVR after LT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The feasibility and efficacy of EVR in 127 liver transplant recipients who were converted to EVR-based immunosuppression was documented retrospectively. Blood samples of these patients were analyzed for the occurrence of 4 SNPs in the mTOR promoter region (mTOR3099/rs2295079 C>G, mTOR3162/rs2295080 A>C) and the mTOR 3' untranslated regio (mTOR8167/rs12139042 C>T, mTOR8600/rs2536 A>G); the specific allele variants were also associated with the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Of all patients, 21 (16.5%) did not tolerate the medication and had to discontinue. Of those patients who continued, 37% developed signs of reduced tolerance within the first 6 months, resolving after 12 months. When the cohort was divided according to genotype and allele frequency, patients with the mTOR3162/rs2295080 CC variant had a significantly higher risk (odds ratio = 5.89; 95% confidence interval = 1.48-23.40; P = .012) of developing new-onset diabetes mellitus following EVR treatment than AA or AC genotype carriers.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the SNP mTOR3162/rs2295080 CC genotype is associated with the development of new-onset diabetes mellitus following EVR treatment.

Very Early Introduction of Everolimus in De Novo Liver Transplantation: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial

Early everolimus (EVR) introduction and tacrolimus (TAC) minimization after liver transplantation may represent a novel immunosuppressant approach. This phase 2, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of early EVR initiation. Patients treated with corticosteroids, TAC, and basiliximab were randomized (2:1) to receive EVR (1.5 mg twice daily) on day 8 and to gradually minimize or withdraw TAC when EVR was stable at >5 ng/mL or to continue TAC at 6-12 ng/mL. The primary endpoint was the proportion of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR)-free patients at 3 months after transplant. As secondary endpoints, composite tBPAR plus graft/patient loss rate, renal function, TAC discontinuation rate, and adverse events were assessed. A total of 93 patients were treated with EVR, and 47 were controls. After 3 months from transplantation, 87.1% of patients with EVR and 95.7% of controls were tBPAR-free (P = 0.09); composite endpoint-free patients with EVR were 85% (versus 94%; P = 0.15). Also at 3 months, 37.6% patients were in monotherapy with EVR, and the tBPAR rate was 11.4%. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly higher with EVR, as early as 2 weeks after randomization. In the study group, higher rates of dyslipidemia (15% versus 6.4%), wound complication (18.32% versus 0%), and incisional hernia (25.8% versus 6.4%) were observed, whereas neurological disorders were more frequent in the control group (13.9% versus 31.9%; P < 0.05). In conclusion, an early EVR introduction and TAC minimization may represent a suitable approach when immediate preservation of renal function is crucial.

Everolimus Rescue Treatment for Chronic Rejection After Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation: 2 Case Reports

Chronic rejection (CR) remains a challenging complication after liver transplantation. Everolimus, which is a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, has an anti-fibrosis effect. We report here the effect of everolimus on CR. Case 1 was a 7-year-old girl who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) shortly after developing fulminant hepatitis at 10 months of age. Liver function tests (LFTs) did not improve after transplantation despite treatment with tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Antithymoglobulin (ATG) and steroid pulse therapy were also ineffective. The patient was diagnosed with CR, and everolimus was started with a target trough level of about 5 ng/mL. LFTs improved and pathological examination showed no progression of hepatic fibrosis. Case 2 was a 10-year-old girl with Alagille syndrome who underwent LDLT at 1 year of age. She had biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection with prolonged LFT abnormalities beginning 3 years after transplantation. She was treated with steroid pulse therapy, followed by MMF, tacrolimus, and prednisolone. Her condition did not improve, even after subsequent ATG administration. CR was suspected based on liver biopsy in the fourth postoperative year, and everolimus was introduced. The target trough level was around 5 ng/mL, but was reduced to 3 ng/mL due to stomatitis. Four years have passed since the initiation of everolimus, and LFTs are stable with no progression of liver biopsy fibrosis. We describe 2 cases in which everolimus was administered for CR. In both cases, LFTs improved and fibrosis did not progress, suggesting that everolimus is an effective treatment for CR after LDLT.

Key role of renal biopsy in management of progressive chronic kidney disease in liver graft recipients

AIMS

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT). The etiology of CKD is broad and may only be assessed accurately by renal histology. The current study aimed to analyze the safety of renal biopsy in daily clinical practice as well as its usefulness regarding management of CKD after LT.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data and renal biopsies obtained from patients with severe renal impairment (overt proteinuria, progressive deterioration of renal function) after LT with respect to safety, etiology of renal disease, and therapeutic consequences.

RESULTS

Renal biopsies were obtained from 14 patients at median (minimum-maximum) 3 (0.2-12) years after LT. No major complications associated with renal biopsy were observed. Histomorphological alterations were varied (nephrosclerosis, n = 5; IgA-glomerulonephritis, n = 4; tenofovir-associated nephropathy, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type 1, membranous glomerulonephritis, amyloid A amyloidosis, and calcineurin inhibitor nephropathy, n = 1, respectively). The diagnosis of specific renal diseases other than calcineurin-inhibitor nephrotoxicity facilitated specific treaments and avoided unnecessary modification of immunosuppression in the majority of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal biopsy in patients with CKD after LT seems safe and may offer specific therapeutic options. Furthermore, unnecessary changes of immunosuppression can be avoided in a considerable number of patients.

Use of everolimus in liver transplantation

In recent years, the use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors has gained traction in their use as alternative or adjunct immunosuppressants in the post-liver transplantation (LT) setting. The efficacy of everolimus (EVR) in de novo LT is established and a reasonable time to initiate EVR is 30 d from LT surgery. Initiating EVR early post-LT allows for calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) reduction, thus reducing nephrotoxicity in LT recipients. However, data is inadequate on the appropriate timing for conversion from CNI to EVR maintenance in order to achieve optimal renoprotective effect without compromising drug efficacy. Adverse effects of proteinuria, hypercholesterolemia and hyperlipidemia are significantly higher as compared to standard CNI and long-term implications on graft and patient survival in LT is still unclear. Future research to explore strategies to minimise EVR adverse effects will be crucial for the success of EVR as an important alternative or adjunct immunosuppressive therapy in LT.

Recommendations of everolimus use in liver transplant

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, everolimus (EVL) and sirolimus are immunosuppressive agents with a minor nephrotoxic effect, limited to the development of proteinuria in some cases. The combination of EVL and low-dose tacrolimus has proven to be as safe and effective as standard therapy with tacrolimus for the prevention of acute cellular rejection. Early initiation of EVL-based immunosuppressive regimens with reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors has been shown to significantly improve renal function of LT recipients during induction and maintenance phases, with comparable efficacy and safety profiles. In patients with established kidney failure, initiating EVL may enable clinicians to reduce calcineurin inhibitors exposure, thereby contributing to the improved renal function of these patients. Although there is not sufficient evidence to recommend their use to prevent the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and the progression of de novo tumours, they are used in this context in routine clinical practice.

Immunosuppression strategies in liver transplantation patient; patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) consists the main primary malignant tumor of the liver. There is an underlining liver cirrhosis mainly attributed to chronic hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus, alcoholic liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and other pathologic conditions. Liver transplantation consists a radical management, treating both cancer and cirrhosis. By introducing the Milan Criteria for liver transplantation in HCC patients there was a 5-year survival escalation. Even though there is a careful selection of patients with HCC for transplantation, recurrent disease is still high. The role of immusuppression therapy is of paramount importance, in order to avoid acute and chronic graft rejection while protecting the patient from tumor recurrence. In recent years newer immunosuppressive agents such as the mTOR inhibitors are proposed, having dual properties, as both immunosuppressive and antitumors agents.

Use of Everolimus in Liver Transplantation: Recommendations From a Working Group

Immunosuppression after liver transplantation (LT) is presently based on use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), although they are associated with an increased incidence of renal dysfunction, cardiovascular complications, and de novo and recurrent malignancies. Over the past decade, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have received considerable attention as immunosuppressants because they are associated with a more favorable renal profile versus CNI, as well as antiproliferative activity in clinical studies. Comprehensive guidelines on use of everolimus (EVR) in LT are still lacking. In Italy, a project, named Everolimus: the road to long-term functioning, was initiated to collect the experience on EVR after LT with the aim of providing guidance for transplant clinicians. Herein, recommendations by this national consensus group, based on Delphi methodology, are presented. Consensus was reached on 20 of the 23 statements proposed, and their level of evidence, grade of recommendation, and percent of agreement are reported. Statements are grouped into 4 areas: (A) renal function; (B) time of EVR introduction, CNI reduction and elimination, and risk for graft rejection; (C) antiproliferative effects of EVR; and (D) management of EVR-related adverse events. The high level of consensus shows that there is good agreement on the routine use of EVR in predefined clinical scenarios, especially in light of posttransplant nephrotoxicity and other adverse events associated with long-term administration of CNIs.

The authors summarize the recommendations reached by an Italian National Consensus group using the Delphi methodology on the use of everolimus in liver transplantation, particularly its role in renal function, antiproliferative effects, adverse events, timing of introduction, and rejection risk.

Modification of immunosuppressive therapy as risk factor for complications after liver transplantation

Management of complications post-liver transplantation (LT) includes immunosuppressive manipulations with the aim to reduce the overall burden of immunologic suppression and compensate for renal, cardiovascular, metabolic toxicities, and for the increased oncologic risk. Two approaches can be implemented to reduce immunosuppression-related adverse events: upfront schedules tailored to the pretransplant individual patient's risk profile versus downstream modifications in the event of immunosuppression-related complications. Upfront strategies are supported by evidence originating from prospective randomized trials and consist of triple/quadruple schedules whereby calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)-exposure is reduced with combination of anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies, antimetabolites and corticosteroids. Quadruple regimens allow for staggering of CNI introduction and higher renal function in the early term, but their superiority in the long term has not yet been established. A more recent upfront schedule contemplates early (4 weeks) introduction of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) everolimus and allows for reduction of CNI up to 4 years posttransplantation. Incorporation of mTORi has the potential to prolong time to recurrence for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, as suggested by the available evidence, downstream immunosuppressive manipulations are more frequently adopted in clinical practice. These encompass CNI replacement and immunosuppression withdrawal. Switching CNI to mTORi monotherapy is the option most commonly adopted to relieve renal function and compensate for posttransplant malignancies. Its impact is dependent on interval from transplantation and underlying severity of renal impairment. Introduction of mTORi is associated with longer overall survival for patients with extrahepatic posttransplant malignancies, but results are awaited for recurrences of hepatocellular carcinoma. Immunosuppression withdrawal seems feasible (70%) in very long term survivors (>10 years), but is not associated with reversal of immunosuppression-related complications. Awaiting novel immunosuppressive drug categories, integration of upfront strategies with the aim to reduce CNI-exposure and a low threshold for adjustment in the posttransplant course are both advisable to improve long-term outcomes of LT.

Toxicity of rapamycin and its derivatives to pancreatic islets

The development of islet transplantation has been promoted by the proposal of the Edmonton protocol. Rapamycin, as a recommended immunosuppressive medicine of the Edmonton protocol, has been getting extraordinarily popular. At the same time, derivatives of rapamycin (everolimus, deforolimus, zotarolimus and temsirolimus) have also garnered great interest. While the immunosuppressive and anti-cancer effects of rapalogs were being discussed actively, researchers discovered their cytotoxic effect on pancreatic islets. Whether they could be ideal drugs for anti-rejection after islet transplantation needs further study. This review aims to elucidate the function and application of rapalogs as well as their toxicity to pancreatic islets.

Everolimus is safe within the first month after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Sirolimus should not be started within the first month after liver transplantation (LT) because of an increased risk of adverse outcomes. The evidence regarding everolimus is lacking but the manufacturer transposed the same warning. We aimed to evaluate the safety of everolimus started within the first month after LT.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort 187 LT patients (2009-2013) with a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression was evaluated. Patients starting everolimus within the first month after LT (n = 33; 17.6%) were compared with those starting everolimus thereafter (n = 25; 13.4%) or not receiving everolimus (n = 129; 69%). The median follow-up after LT was 21 months (IQR 7-36). Prospective outcomes were evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox's regression.

RESULTS

The incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis was not significantly different in patients early treated with everolimus when compared with the remaining cohort (0% vs 9.1%; p = 0.12). Other vascular complications occurred in 9.1% of patients with early everolimus vs 7.3% in the remaining cohort (p = 0.72). No wound healing complications were detected with early everolimus. There were similar rates of incisional hernia (p = 0.31), infections (p = 0.15), renal impairment (p = 0.37), and histologically-proven acute rejection (p = 0.24) between groups. The rates of hyperlipidemia were increased with early everolimus (29.9% vs 16.5% at 3 years; p = 0.018). Graft loss and mortality rates were similar between groups (p = 0.34 and p = 0.94 respectively), after adjusting for possible confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Everolimus combined with reduced tacrolimus proved to be safe within the first month after LT. Future trials may be allowed to implement everolimus early after LT.

Renal function improvement in liver transplant recipients after early everolimus conversion: A clinical practice cohort study in Spain

A national, multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to assess the results obtained for liver transplant recipients with conversion to everolimus in daily practice. The study included 477 recipients (481 transplantations). Indications for conversion to everolimus were renal dysfunction (32.6% of cases), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; 30.2%; prophylactic treatment for 68.9%), and de novo malignancy (29.7%). The median time from transplantation to conversion to everolimus was 68.7 months for de novo malignancy, 23.8 months for renal dysfunction, and 7.1 months for HCC and other indications. During the first year of treatment, mean everolimus trough levels were 5.4 (standard deviation [SD], 2.7) ng/mL and doses remained stable (1.5 mg/day) from the first month after conversion. An everolimus monotherapy regimen was followed by 28.5% of patients at 12 months. Patients with renal dysfunction showed a glomerular filtration rate (4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) increase of 10.9 mL (baseline mean, 45.8 [SD, 25.3] versus 57.6 [SD, 27.6] mL/minute/1.73 m(2) ) at 3 months after everolimus initiation (P < 0.001), and 6.8 mL at 12 months. Improvement in renal function was higher in patients with early conversion (<1 year). Adverse events were the primary reason for discontinuation in 11.2% of cases. The probability of survival at 3 years after conversion to everolimus was 83.0%, 71.1%, and 59.5% for the renal dysfunction, de novo malignancy, and HCC groups, respectively. Everolimus is a viable option for the treatment of renal dysfunction, and earlier conversion is associated with better recovery of renal function. Prospective studies are needed to confirm advantages in patients with malignancy.

Evaluating the efficacy, safety and evolution of renal function with early initiation of everolimus-facilitated tacrolimus reduction in de novo liver transplant recipients: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Introduction of calcineurin inhibitors had led to improved survival rates in liver transplant recipients. However, long-term use of calcineurin inhibitors is associated with a higher risk of chronic renal failure, neurotoxicity, de novo malignancies, recurrence of hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection and hepatocellular carcinoma. Several studies have shown that everolimus has the potential to provide protection against viral replication, malignancy, and progression of fibrosis, as well as preventing nephrotoxicity by facilitating calcineurin inhibitor reduction without compromising efficacy. The Hephaistos study evaluates the beneficial effects of early initiation of everolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients.

METHODS/DESIGN

Hephaistos is an ongoing 12-month, multi-center, open-label, controlled study aiming to enroll 330 de novo liver transplant recipients from 15 centers across Germany. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio (7-21 days post-transplantation) to receive everolimus (trough levels 3-8 ng/mL) with reduced tacrolimus (trough levels <5 ng/mL), or standard tacrolimus (trough levels 6-10 ng/mL) after entering a run-in period (3-5 days post-transplantation). In the run-in period, patients are treated with induction therapy, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and corticosteroids according to local practice. Randomization is stratified by HCV status and model of end-stage liver disease scores at transplantation. The primary objective of the study is to exhibit superior renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate assessed by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)-4 formula) with everolimus plus reduced tacrolimus compared to standard tacrolimus at Month 12. Other objectives are: to assess the incidence of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death; the incidences of components of the composite efficacy endpoint; renal function via estimated glomerular filtration rate using various formulae (MDRD-4, Nankivell, Cockcroft-Gault, chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration and Hoek formulae); the incidence of proteinuria; the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events; the incidence and severity of cytomegalovirus and HCV infections and HCV-related fibrosis.

DISCUSSION

This study aims to demonstrate superior renal function, comparable efficacy, and safety in de novo liver transplant recipients receiving everolimus with reduced tacrolimus compared with standard tacrolimus. This study also evaluates the antiviral benefit by early initiation of everolimus.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01551212 .

Experience of using everolimus in the early stage of living donor liver transplantation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to review the experience of early use of everolimus for recipients after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.

METHODS

From February 2012 to December 2012, 80 recipients underwent living donor liver transplantation. Forty-three of them used everolimus as an adjunct to the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in the early postoperative period. Thirty-nine patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and poor renal function was noted in 9 patients. Ten of them were females and 33 were males. The age varied from 39 to 75 years old. The starting date of use was within 1 week in 33 patients, 2 weeks in 9 patients, and 1 patient was administered on postoperative day 20. The initial doses of everolimus were 0.25 mg every 12 hours and increased to 0.5 mg every 12 hours to target the level at 3-5 ng/mL. Doppler ultrasound was performed regularly postoperative days 1, 4, and 14.

RESULTS

The mean time between liver transplantation and everolimus treatment was 12 ± 8 days. The maximum dose of everolimus used was 1 mg/d with a target trough level between 3 and 5 ng/mL. At 3 months, a target trough level of 3 ng/mL was achieved. Six of 9 renal failure patients showed significant recovery of renal function, whereas 3 of them showed further deterioration and 1 required hemodialysis. During the follow-up period of 9 ± 6 months, all showed good patency of hepatic artery without thrombosis. Three patients (7%) developed HCC recurrence, whereas 1 patient died at the 10th month postoperative due to sepsis. Elevation of lipid profile was noted in 5 patients. Stomatitis was the most frequent side effect and occurred in 15 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The early use of everolimus was safe and feasible. Also, it can be safely used in patients with prior renal failure while reducing the doses of CNIs. Although the recurrence rate of HCC was reduced, further study is ongoing to evaluate the long-term impact of everolimus on prevention of HCC recurrence.

Everolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil as initial immunosuppression in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a de novo immunosuppressive regimen with everolimus (EVL) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) without calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) for liver transplantation. The secondary purpose was to compare the renal function with a control group of patients treated with tacrolimus plus MMF.

METHODS

Sixteen male and 4 female liver transplant patients received immunosuppression with EVL plus MMF without CNI, with induction with steroids and 16 with basiliximab also. In 10 cases it was indicated as induction immunosuppression without CNI as prevention against nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity or recurrence of hepatocarcinoma in predisposed patients and in another 10 after withdrawing CNI during the immediate post-transplant period, before hospital discharge, as the result of toxicity, mainly nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity or the presence of hepatocarcinoma with a high risk of recurrence. A control group comprising 31 patients taking tacrolimus plus MMF was included to compare the renal function.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 24 months. One patient had a recurrence of hepatocarcinoma at 8 months after transplant. The cases of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity resolved favorably. There were 7 rejections (35%); 2 evolved to chronic rejection with both needing retransplantation, 2 resolved with dose adjustment, and 3 required conversion to CNI. The side effects were hyperlipidemia (25%), wound dehiscence (10%), lymphedema (10%), cytomegalovirus infection (25%), myelotoxicity (25%) and proteinuria >1 g in 1 case (5%). No differences were found in renal function between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen was proven to be efficient to prevent and treat nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity with an acceptable tolerability profile. However, the high associated rejection rate indicates that great caution is required in its use during the immediate post-transplant period. It is advisable to associate the regimen with low doses of CNI and to have agile methods available to monitor EVL to enable rapid dose adjustment.

The role of everolimus in liver transplantation

During the last 5 decades, liver transplantation has witnessed rapid development in terms of both technical and pharmacologic advances. Since their discovery, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have remained the standard of care for immunosuppression therapy in liver transplantation, improving both patient and graft survival. However, adverse events, particularly posttransplant nephrotoxicity, associated with long-term CNI use have necessitated the development of alternate treatment approaches. These include combination therapy with a CNI and the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase inhibitor mycophenolic acid and use of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. Everolimus, a 40-O-(2-hydroxyethyl) derivative of mTOR inhibitor sirolimus, has a distinct pharmacokinetic profile. Several studies have assessed the role of everolimus in liver transplant recipients in combination with CNI reduction or as a CNI withdrawal strategy. The efficacy of everolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy has been demonstrated in both de novo and maintenance liver transplant recipients. A pivotal study in 719 de novo liver transplant recipients formed the basis of the recent approval of everolimus in combination with steroids and reduced-dose tacrolimus in liver transplantation. In this study, everolimus introduced at 30 days posttransplantation in combination with reduced-dose tacrolimus (exposure reduced by 39%) showed comparable efficacy (composite efficacy failure rate of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death) and achieved superior renal function as early as month 1 and maintained it over 2 years versus standard exposure tacrolimus. This review provides an overview of the efficacy and safety of everolimus-based regimens in liver transplantation in the de novo and maintenance settings, as well as in special populations such as patients with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, hepatitis C virus-positive patients, and pediatric transplant recipients. We also provide an overview of ongoing studies and discuss potential expansion of the role for everolimus in these settings.

Immunosuppression: trends and tolerance?

Advances in pharmacologic immunosuppression are responsible for the excellent outcomes experienced by recipients of liver transplants. However, long-term follow-up of these patients reveals an increasing burden of morbidity and mortality that is attributable to these drugs. The authors summarize the agents used in contemporary liver transplantation immunosuppression protocols and discuss the emerging trend within the community to minimize or eliminate these agents from use. The authors present recently published data that may provide the foundation for immunosuppression minimization or tolerance induction in the future and review studies that have focused on the utility of biomarkers in guiding immunosuppression management.

Everolimus immunosuppression reduces the serum expression of fibrosis markers in liver transplant recipients

AIM: To evaluate the expression of serum fibrosis markers in liver transplantation (LT) recipients on everolimus monotherapy compared to patients on an anti-calcineurin regimen.

METHODS: This cross-sectional case-control study included LT patients on everolimus monotherapy (cases) (E) (n = 30) and matched controls on an anti-calcineurin regimen (calcineurin inhibitors, CNI), paired by etiology of liver disease and time since LT (n = 30). Clinical characteristics, blood tests and elastography were collected. Serum levels of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), angiopoietin-1, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), platelet derived growth factor, amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP), hyaluronic acid (HA), VCM-1 (ng/mL), interleukin (IL)-10, interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP-10), vascular endothelial growth factor and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (pg/mL) were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Expression of these markers between E and CNI was compared. Stratified analysis was done according to factors that may influence liver fibrosis. Variables are described with medians (interquartillic range) or percentages.

RESULTS: A total of 60 patients [age: 59 (49-64), hepatitis C virus (HCV): n = 21 (35%), time from LT: 73 mo (16-105)] were included. Patients had been on everolimus for a median of 15 mo. No differences in inflammatory activity, APRI test or liver elastography were found between the groups. No significant differences were observed between the groups in serum levels of PIIINP, metalloproteinase type = 1, angiopoietin, HGF, IP-10, TNF-α, IL-10 and vascular cell adhesion molecule. Patients on E had a lower expression of TGF-β [E: 12.7 (3.7-133.6), CNI: 152.5 (14.4-333.2), P = 0.009] and HA [E: 702.89 (329.4-838.2), CNI: 1513.6 (691.9-1951.4), P = 0.001] than those on CNI. This difference was maintained in the stratified analysis when recipient age is more than 50 years (TFG-β1: P = 0.06; HA: P = 0.005), in patients without active neoplasia (TFG-β1, P = 0.009; HA: P = 0.01), according to time since LT (> than 5 years, TFG-β1: P = 0.001; HA: P = 0.002), related to previous history of biliary complications (HA: P = 0.01) and HCV recurrence (HA: P = 0.004). Liver transplant recipients with everolimus monotherapy had less serum expression of TGF-β y HA than matched patients with anti-calcineurins. This difference remains when classifying patients according to donor age and time since LT. Due to the small sample size, when examining patients with a prior history of biliary complications or recurrent HCV, the difference was non-significant but trends towards the lower expression of TFG-β1 in the everolimus group. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) plays a role in the transformation of quiescent hepatocellular stellate cell to their active profibrotic state, and experimental models have demonstrated the potential activity of mTOR inhibition in attenuating fibrogenesis.

CONCLUSION: This study supports a possible role of everolimus in liver fibrosis modulation after LT in a clinical setting and suggests that tailoring immunosuppression could avoid fibrosis progression in the allograft.

Multiple indications for everolimus after liver transplantation in current clinical practice

AIM: To assess our experience with the use and management of everolimus-based regimens post-liver transplantation and to redefine the potential role of this drug in current clinical practice.

METHODS: From October 1988 to December 2012, 1023 liver transplantations were performed in 955 patients in our Unit. Seventy-four patients (7.74%) received immunosuppression with everolimus at some time post-transplantation. Demographic characteristics, everolimus indication, time elapsed from transplantation to the introduction of everolimus, doses and levels administered, efficacy, side effects, discontinuation and post-conversion survival were analyzed.

RESULTS: Mean age at the time of conversion to everolimus was 57.7 ± 10 years. Indications for conversion were: refractory rejection 31.1%, extended hepatocellular carcinoma in explanted liver 19%, post-transplant hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence 8.1%, de novo tumour 17.6%, renal insufficiency 8.1%, severe neurotoxicity 10.8%, and others 5.4%. Median time from transplantation to introduction of everolimus was 6 mo (range: 0.10-192). Mean follow-up post-conversion was 22 ± 19 mo (range: 0.50-74). The event for which the drug was indicated was resolved in 60.8% of patients, with the best results in cases of refractory rejection, renal insufficiency and neurotoxicity. Results in patients with cancer were similar to those of a historical cohort treated with other immunosuppressants. The main side effects were dyslipidemia and infections. Post-conversion acute rejection occurred in 14.9% of cases. The drug was discontinued in 28.4% of patients.

CONCLUSION: Everolimus at low doses in combination with tacrolimus is a safe immunosuppressant with multiple early and late indications post-liver transplantation.

Current strategies for immunosuppression following liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

New strategies for immunosuppression (IS) after liver transplantation (LTx) are in part responsible for the increased patient and graft survival seen over time. With a few basic exceptions-notably the continued use of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs)-IS drugs and regimens being used today are different from those used 30 years ago. While graft loss due to acute or chronic rejection has become rare, the side effect burden of IS drugs exerts a significant toll on patients.

CONCEPTS/TRENDS

CNIs continue to form the backbone of IS regimens, although their use is hampered by nephrotoxicity and other adverse effects. Consequently, a variety of CNI reduction or withdrawal strategies have formed the basis of clinical trials or entered into clinical practice. These trials have included the use of everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, and anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies. Basiliximab, as well as other lymphocyte nondepleting and depleting agents, have shown benefit in induction regimens.

SUMMARY

Along with steroid reduction or elimination, current strategies for IS after LTx continue to explore novel combinations of agents, with an aim toward striking a balance between diminution of rejection and the need for avoiding adverse effects of the IS drugs. Long-term maintenance strategies are also discussed in this review, as is development of tolerance and antibody-mediated rejection.

The Role of mTOR Inhibitors in Liver Transplantation: Reviewing the Evidence

Despite the success of liver transplantation, long-term complications remain, including de novo malignancies, metabolic syndrome, and the recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The current mainstay of treatment, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), can also worsen posttransplant renal dysfunction, neurotoxicity, and diabetes. Clearly there is a need for better immunosuppressive agents that maintain similar rates of efficacy and renal function whilst minimizing adverse effects. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors with a mechanism of action that is different from other immunosuppressive agents has the potential to address some of these issues. In this review we surveyed the literature for reports of the use of mTOR inhibitors in adult liver transplantation with respect to renal function, efficacy, safety, neurological symptoms, de novo tumors, and the recurrence of HCC and HCV. The results of our review indicate that mTOR inhibitors are associated with efficacy comparable to CNIs while having benefits on renal function in liver transplantation. We also consider newer dosing schedules that may limit side effects. Finally, we discuss evidence that mTOR inhibitors may have benefits in the oncology setting and in relation to HCV-related allograft fibrosis, metabolic syndrome, and neurotoxicity.

De novo sirolimus and reduced-dose tacrolimus versus standard-dose tacrolimus after liver transplantation: the 2000-2003 phase II prospective randomized trial

We studied whether the use of sirolimus with reduced-dose tacrolimus, as compared to standard-dose tacrolimus, after liver transplantation is safe, tolerated and efficacious. In an international multicenter, open-label, active-controlled randomized trial (2000-2003), adult primary liver transplant recipients (n=222) were randomly assigned immediately after transplantation to conventional-dose tacrolimus (trough: 7-15 ng/mL) or sirolimus (loading dose: 15 mg, initial dose: 5 mg titrated to a trough of 4-11 ng/mL) and reduced-dose tacrolimus (trough: 3-7 ng/mL). The study was terminated after 21 months due to imbalance in adverse events. The 24-month cumulative incidence of graft loss (26.4% vs. 12.5%, p=0.009) and patient death (20% vs. 8%, p=0.010) was higher in subjects receiving sirolimus. A numerically higher rate of hepatic artery thrombosis/portal vein thrombosis was observed in the sirolimus arm (8% vs. 3%, p=0.065). The incidence of sepsis was higher in the sirolimus arm (20.4% vs. 7.2%, p=0.006). Rates of acute cellular rejection were similar between the two groups. Early use of sirolimus using a loading dose followed by maintenance doses and reduced-dose tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients is associated with higher rates of graft loss, death and sepsis when compared to the use of conventional-dose tacrolimus alone.

Everolimus monotherapy or combined therapy in liver transplantation: indications and results

INTRODUCTION

Everolimus is a potent immunosuppressant with several advantages over calcineurin inhibitors, such as good tolerance, preventive effects on cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality and cancer prevention as it inhibits cell proliferation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 1986 and December 2010, we performed 1500 liver transplants (OLT) in 1341 recipients, including 57 patients who were prescribed everolimus 24 (42.1%) as monotherapy and 33 (57.9%) as treatments combined with other immunosuppressants. We performed a retrospective analysis of our experience with conversion to everolimus in OLT recipients.

RESULTS

The 43 men and 14 women had a mean overall age at transplantation of 59.1 ± 10 years. The most frequent indication for OLT was hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; 53.8%). Everolimus was introduced to prevent HCC recurrence (53%), development of de novo tumors (33%), address renal dysfunction (7%), or overcome side effects of other immunosuppressants (7%). We observed a significant improvement in renal function using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (Crockcroft-Gault formula) from 68.5 mL/min before to 74.5 mL/min after switching to everolimus. The 72% of recipients who developed ≥1 adverse event, most frequently showed hyperlipidemia (34.4%).

CONCLUSION

Both monotherapy and combined everolimus regimens were well-tolerated immunosuppressive regimens in liver transplant recipients with recurrent or de novo malignancies. Everolimus improved renal function. The most common side effects were hyperlipidemia, edema, and mouth ulcerations, which were well controlled with anti-lipidemic agents or decreased everolimus dosages.

Therapeutic potential and adverse events of everolimus for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma - systematic review and meta-analysis

Everolimus is an orally administrated mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor. Several large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the survival benefits of everolimus at the dose of 10 mg/day for solid cancers. Furthermore, mTOR-inhibitor-based immunosuppression is associated with survival benefits for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have received liver transplantation. However, a low rate of tumor reduction and some adverse events have been pointed out. This review summarizes the antitumor effects and adverse events of everolimus and evaluates its possible application in advanced HCC. For the meta-analysis of adverse events, we used the RCTs for solid cancers. The odds ratios of adverse events were calculated using the Peto method. Manypreclinical studies demonstrated that everolimus had antitumor effects such as antiproliferation and antiangiogenesis. However, some differences in the effects were observed among in vivo animal studies for HCC treatment. Meanwhile, clinical studies demonstrated that the response rate of single-agent everolimus was low, though survival benefits could be expected. The meta-analysis revealed the odds ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) of stomatitis: 5.42 [4.31-6.73], hyperglycemia: 3.22 [2.37-4.39], anemia: 3.34 [2.37-4.67], pneumonitis: 6.02 [3.95-9.16], aspartate aminotransferase levels: 2.22 [1.37-3.62], and serum alanine aminotransferase levels: 2.94 [1.72-5.02], respectively. Everolimus at the dose of 10 mg/day significantly increased the risk of the adverse events. In order to enable its application to the standard conventional therapies of HCC, further studies are required to enhance the antitumor effects and manage the adverse events of everolimus.

A comprehensive review of everolimus clinical reports: a new mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor

As new immunosuppressive agents are introduced to the market, clinicians are faced with the daunting task of sifting through the published literature to decide the value that the agent will add to their own practice. We often must extrapolate information provided through study in other solid-organ transplantation populations than our specific area of interest as we interpret the results and outcomes. With these challenges in mind, this compilation of published work for the newest mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus (Certican; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Hanover, NJ) (Zortress; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland) is intended to provide a concise but thorough presentation of available literature so that the reader who may be unfamiliar with the agent can make their own judgment. Both Ovid and PubMed search engines were queried with a particular focus on high-impact articles noted in the Web of Science or Citation Index. Work described solely in abstract or case report form was excluded, as well as meta-analyses or those that were editorial or commentary in nature. Included were publications presented using the English language that described adult human subjects who received a heart, lung, kidney, or liver allograft. The goal of this strategy was to allow for the inclusion of pertinent literature in an unbiased fashion. Tables are provided that outline trial specific information, leaving a discussion of major outcomes to the text of the review.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation nine years after liver transplantation--a case report

In this case report we have described a patient suffering from sclerosing cholangitis, diabetes mellitus type I, and consequent end-stage renal disease who was successfully treated with simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation 9 years after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Everolimus with reduced tacrolimus improves renal function in de novo liver transplant recipients: a randomized controlled trial

In a prospective, multicenter, open-label study, de novo liver transplant patients were randomized at day 30±5 to (i) everolimus initiation with tacrolimus elimination (TAC Elimination) (ii) everolimus initiation with reduced-exposure tacrolimus (EVR+Reduced TAC) or (iii) standard-exposure tacrolimus (TAC Control). Randomization to TAC Elimination was terminated prematurely due to a higher rate of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR). EVR+Reduced TAC was noninferior to TAC Control for the primary efficacy endpoint (tBPAR, graft loss or death at 12 months posttransplantation): 6.7% versus 9.7% (-3.0%; 95% CI -8.7, 2.6%; p<0.001 for noninferiority [12% margin]). tBPAR occurred in 2.9% of EVR+Reduced TAC patients versus 7.0% of TAC Controls (p = 0.035). The change in adjusted estimated GFR from randomization to month 12 was superior with EVR+Reduced TAC versus TAC Control (difference 8.50 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , 97.5% CI 3.74, 13.27 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , p<0.001 for superiority). Drug discontinuation for adverse events occurred in 25.7% of EVR+Reduced TAC and 14.1% of TAC Controls (relative risk 1.82, 95% CI 1.25, 2.66). Relative risk of serious infections between the EVR+Reduced TAC group versus TAC Controls was 1.76 (95% CI 1.03, 3.00). Everolimus facilitates early tacrolimus minimization with comparable efficacy and superior renal function, compared to a standard tacrolimus exposure regimen 12 months after liver transplantation.

Impact of sirolimus and tacrolimus on mortality and graft loss in liver transplant recipients with or without hepatitis C virus: an analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Database

By analyzing 26,414 patients [12,589 with hepatitis C virus (HCV)] in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Database, we sought to determine comparative risk factors (including primary immunosuppression) predictive of death and graft loss among patients with HCV and patients without HCV. Immunosuppression was examined at the baseline and as a time-dependent variable, and the results were stratified by the transplant center and were adjusted for variables well known to affect patient and graft survival. A multivariate analysis of patient mortality demonstrated that recipient age, donor age, hepatocellular carcinoma, diabetes, and creatinine were significantly associated with increased 3-year mortality for both groups. Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression was associated with superior survival in both groups. In contrast, the use of sirolimus was strongly associated with increased mortality in the HCV group, and cyclosporine was associated with increased mortality in the non-HCV group. Adjusting for known and unknown factors predictive of posttransplant outcomes, a propensity analysis confirmed the association of sirolimus use with an increased risk of death in HCV patients as well as the association of tacrolimus use with a decreased risk of death in all patients. In conclusion, this study suggests a novel association between sirolimus use and an increased risk of death and graft loss after liver transplantation in HCV patients that is not seen in patients without HCV. This study confirms the association of tacrolimus with superior outcomes. Sirolimus should be used sparingly in recipients with HCV infections.

Everolimus and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium ab initio after liver transplantation: midterm results

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Everolimus (EVR) use in liver transplantation (OLT) has been prescribed with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), steroids, and monoclonal antibodies. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and impact on renal function of EVR ab initio, in combination with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) without the use of induction treatment, steroids, or CNIs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospective analyzed nine consecutive patients who underwent OLT at our institution. The initial dose of EVR (1.5 mg/d) was adjusted to achieve trough levels of 8 to 12 ng/mL. EC-MPS introduced at 1080 mg/d was maintained at the same dose over time.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 21.48 (standard deviation [SD] 1.4) months from OLT, 7/9 recipients were alive with stable graft function. The 2-year patient and graft survivals were 77%. One recipient died due to cerebral hemorrhage and one, lung failure. No clinical evidence of an acute rejection episode was observed. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate value, according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula increased from 59.5 (SD 9.89) mL/min/1.73 m(2) at OLT to 100.2 (SD 47.5) mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = .03) after 12 months and 98.71 (SD 33.74) mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = .03) after 24 months' follow-up.

CONCLUSION

A double immunosuppression therapy with EVR and EC-MPS ab initio seemed to be efficacions and safe, representing a valid alternative to CNIs to prevent renal failure after OLT.

A randomized, controlled study to assess the conversion from calcineurin-inhibitors to everolimus after liver transplantation--PROTECT

Posttransplant immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is associated with impaired renal function, while mTor inhibitors such as everolimus may provide a renal-sparing alternative. In this randomized 1-year study in patients with liver transplantation (LTx), we sought to assess the effects of everolimus on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after conversion from CNIs compared to continued CNI treatment. Eligible study patients received basiliximab induction, CNI with/without corticosteroids for 4 weeks post-LTx, and were then randomized (if GFR > 50 mL/min) to continued CNIs (N = 102) or subsequent conversion to EVR (N = 101). Mean calculated GFR 11 months postrandomization (ITT population) revealed no significant difference between treatments using the Cockcroft-Gault formula (-2.9 mL/min in favor of EVR, 95%-CI: [-10.659; 4.814], p = 0.46), whereas use of the MDRD formula showed superiority for EVR (-7.8 mL/min, 95%-CI: [-14.366; -1.191], p = 0.021). Rates of mortality (EVR: 4.2% vs. CNI: 4.1%), biopsy-proven acute rejection (17.7% vs. 15.3%), and efficacy failure (20.8% vs. 20.4%) were similar. Infections, leukocytopenia, hyperlipidemia and treatment discontinuations occurred more frequently in the EVR group. No hepatic artery thrombosis and no excess of wound healing impairment were noted. Conversion from CNI-based to EVR-based immunosuppression proved to be a safe alternative post-LTx that deserves further investigation in terms of nephroprotection.

Immunosuppression and HCV recurrence after liver transplantation

HCV related liver disease is the most common indication for liver transplantation. Recurrence of HCV infection is universal and has a substantial impact on patient and graft survival. Immunosuppression is a major factor responsible for the accelerated recurrence and compressed natural history of recurrent HCV infection. Accumulating experience has provided data to support certain strategies for immunosuppressive regimens. From the available evidence, more severe recurrence results from repeated bolus corticosteroid therapy and anti-lymphocyte antibodies used to treat rejection. Low dose and slow tapering of steroids are better than high dose maintenance and/or rapid tapering. Recent meta-analyses favour steroid-free regimens but these are complicated to interpret as the absence of steroids may simply represent less immunopotency. There is no difference in HCV recurrence between tacrolimus and cyclosporine regimens, but tacrolimus increases graft and patient survival in HCV transplanted patients. There may be a beneficial effect of maintenance azathioprine given for 6 months or longer. There is no conclusive evidence for benefit of mycophenolate and interleukin-2 receptor blockers. Few data are available for mTOR inhibitors. Better evidence is needed to establish the optimal immunosuppressive regimen for HCV recipients and more randomized trials should be performed.

Everolimus in clinical practice in long-term liver transplantation: an observational study

INTRODUCTION

Everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, has been used in acute and chronic treatment of kidney and heart transplants. There is scarce information regarding its use in liver transplant recipients, although everolimus may be a useful alternative for selected cases.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to study the clinical, biochemical, and pathological features of patients to whom everolimus was added based upon defined clinical profiles.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was prospective observational ongoing study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of everolimus alone or in combination with low doses of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). Chronic liver transplant recipients without contraindications to everolimus were defined based upon 7 profiles of complications. The initial everolimus dose (0.25 mg every 12 hours) was overlapped during conversion, measuring blood levels and evaluating clinical tolerance. Routine monitoring was performed to obtain immunosuppressant blood levels near the lower limit of the therapeutic range.

RESULTS

The 35 patients' including 17 men and 18 women, had an overall mean age of 61 ± 10 years with a mean follow-up of 34 months. The everolimus treatment lasted 20 months (range, 6-60). The indication for everolimus conversion were as follows: renal insufficiency (45.7%), no response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment (42.9%), autoimmune hepatitis associated with interferon (8.5%), de novo autoimmune hepatitis (25.5%), de novo tumor (37.1%), neurotoxicity (14.3%), or side effects to rapamycin treatment (5.7%). Patients may have presented more than one indication. Effectiveness was assessed based upon improved liver (48.6%) or renal function (31.25% with renal insufficiency) or withdrawal of prednisone (100% of 10 patients receiving prednisone). CNI was withdrawn from 48.6% of patients due to de novo tumors or neurotoxicity. The side effect were as follows: anemia, leukopenia, or thrombocytopenia (11.4%) or dyslipidemia (27.3%). The survival rate was 94.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of everolimus to chronic liver transplants enhanced therapeutic options in the long term recipients when applied for predefined clinical indications and administrated with dose adjustments based on serial monitoring of exposure.

Conversion to everolimus in liver transplant patients with renal dysfunction

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) immunosuppressive therapy post-liver transplantation (OLT) is important to reduce graft rejection episodes. However, these drugs show important side effects, particularly renal dysfunction (RDF). Changing from CNI to a nonnephrotoxic drug, as mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor may solve the problem. Our objective was to evaluate renal function (RF) among liver transplant patients initially receiving CNI, among whom the patients with RDF were converted completely or partially to an mTOR inhibitor like everolimus (EVE). We performed a prospective study in liver transplant patients from 2000 to 2009. Creatinine levels and creatinine clearances (Cockroft-Gault) expressed as mean values ± standard deviations were measured pre- and postswitch for comparisons using Wilcoxon nonparametric tests. Six patients were converted fully or partially to EVE. Their mean age at the moment of introducing the new therapy was 52.2 ± 13.6 years (range = 28-60). Immunosuppression time prior to switching from CNI to EVE was 23.8 ± 26.6 months (range = 6-70). Postconversion follow-up was 25.8 ± 16.5 months (range = 8-42). All patients showed improvement in RF. The creatinine level improvement was significant (P = .03) namely, from a mean of 2.26 ± 0.49 to 1.21 ± 0.57 mg/dL. Glomerular filtration rate improved from a mean of 40 ± 15.13 to 72.60 ± 17.3 mL/min/m(2) (P = .03). Conversion from CNI to EVE improved creatinine concentrations and creatinine clearances with long-term effects free of graft rejection.

m-TOR inhibitors: what role in liver transplantation?

The development of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) led to marked improvements in patient and graft survival after liver transplantation (LTx). We have been left, however, with a dependence on immunosuppressive agents with nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, adverse impacts on cardiac risk profile, and risk for malignancy. These challenges need to be met against a dominance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as indications for liver transplant. Unmet needs for immunosuppression (IS) in LTx include: (1) Effective drugs that avoid CNIs toxicities. (2) Agents without adverse impact on HCV recurrence. (3) Compounds that minimize risk of HCC recurrence. New immunosuppressives will need to address the above needs while supporting patient and graft survival equivalent to those achievable with CNIs, ideally without important new toxicities. Two new classes of agents are currently in advanced clinical development: belatacept, and the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (m-TORi). This manuscript will review evidence for a role for m-TORi in LTx in a range of clinical scenarios including patients with CNI nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity, patients at risk of (or with) HCV recurrence, and patients at risk of HCC recurrence.

The metabolic and toxicological considerations for mTOR inhibitors in the treatment of hepatocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major health problem worldwide. Several molecular pathways involved in HCC growth and progression have recently been identified. Rapamycin analogs are able to inhibit one of the most active oncogenic molecular pathways in HCC cells: the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors analyze the principal molecular features of the mTOR pathway and the use of rapamycin analogs in the treatment of hepatocarcinoma. The article also looks at the reoccurrence of HCC following liver transplantation as well as after the treatment of de novo neoplasms. Finally, the authors discuss the advantage of using a combined HCC pharmacological therapy to obtain a synergistic effect on tumor mass.

EXPERT OPINION

Among the available options for the treatment of advanced-stage HCC, mTOR pathway inhibitors show great promise. Once these agents have their safety and efficacy confirmed, in the treatment of liver disease, their use should be considered in patients affected by HCC. This should especially be the case for those who have had liver transplants or suffered with de novo tumors. Moreover, the authors believe that mTOR inhibitors could be used in a combined pharmacological approach to improve HCC molecular-targeted therapy by producing a multiple-level block of tumor intracellular signaling.

Conversion to everolimus in maintenance liver transplant patients: a multicenter, retrospective analysis

Data on the conversion of patients to everolimus after liver transplantation are sparse. A multicenter, retrospective study followed 240 maintenance liver transplant patients to analyze the current indications for everolimus conversion, the employed regimens and exposure levels, and the impact on efficacy and safety. The mean time from transplantation to the introduction of everolimus was 4.9 ± 5.2 years. The mean everolimus trough level was 7.3 ± 4.1 ng/mL at month 1 and 8.1 ± 4.7 ng/mL at month 12. At 12 months, 61.6% of the patients were no longer receiving calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula was 64.2 ± 30.0 mL/minute on day 0 and 68.4 ± 32.5 mL/minute at month 12 (P = 0.007). Among patients with baseline serum creatinine levels ≥ 130 μmol/L, the eGFR values were 44.3 ± 15.7 mL/minute on day 0 and 53.7 ± 26.0 mL/minute at month 12 (P = 0.003). Four patients (1.6%) developed mild or moderate biopsy-proven acute rejection. Adverse events led to everolimus discontinuation in 12.9% of the patients. After the initiation of everolimus, the mean white blood cell count decreased significantly, and the total cholesterol and triglyceride levels increased significantly. In this retrospective analysis of the largest cohort of maintenance liver transplant patients analyzed after their conversion to everolimus, more than 60% of the patients were kept free of CNIs with a very low risk of acute rejection and with an acceptable safety profile. Randomized trials in which maintenance liver transplant patients are switched to everolimus in response to clinical indications or preemptively are warranted.

The use of everolimus in pediatric liver transplant recipients: first experience in a single center

The role of mTOR inhibitors, such as EVL, has not been established for pediatric liver transplant recipients up to now, although data from adult solid organ graft transplantation are very promising. Major complications following pediatric liver transplantation in the long-term course include chronic graft rejection and CNI-derived nephrotoxicity. The purpose of our study was to report first results using EVL as a rescue therapy in pediatric liver transplant recipients for the following indications: chronic graft dysfunction n=12, suspected CNI toxicity n=3, hepatoblastoma n=2, and recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis post-Ltx n=1. Four patients with chronic graft dysfunction developed completely normal liver function tests using EVL, six patients showed partial improvement, and two patients did not respond at all. One patient with CNI-induced nephropathy showed a slightly improved GFR. Both patients with hepatoblastoma did not develop any metastasis post-Ltx. First experience with EVL in pediatric liver transplant recipients shows promising results in patients with chronic graft failure when standard immunosuppression has failed. The future role of EVL in immunosuppressive protocols for children post-Ltx has to be proven by controlled clinical trials.

Everolimus: a proliferation signal inhibitor with clinical applications in organ transplantation, oncology, and cardiology

Everolimus, a proliferation signal inhibitor in the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) drug class, has many clinical applications, including in organ transplantation, oncology, and cardiology. It currently has United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for prophylaxis against rejection in de novo renal transplant recipients, treatment of renal cell carcinoma, and use as a drug-eluting stent. To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of everolimus, we performed a search of the MEDLINE database (January 1997-April 2010) for all English-language articles of in vitro and in vivo studies that evaluated everolimus, as well as abstracts from recent scientific meetings and the manufacturer. In transplantation, everolimus demonstrates immunosuppressive properties and has been used to prevent acute rejection in cardiac, liver, lung, and renal transplant recipients. It appears that this agent may be potent enough to allow for the minimization or removal of calcineurin inhibitors in the long-term management of renal transplant recipients. In oncology, everolimus has been proven effective for the management of treatment-resistant renal cell carcinoma. In cardiology, everolimus is available as a drug-coated stent and is used in percutaneous coronary interventions for prevention of restenosis. In transplant recipients and patients with renal cell carcinoma, everolimus appears to have an extensive adverse-event profile. The pharmacologic properties of everolimus differentiate this agent from other drugs used in these clinical areas, and its pharmacokinetic properties differentiate it from sirolimus.