An evaluation of seven methods of testing in vitro susceptibility of clinical yeast isolates to fluconazole

Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)-Phenomena in Candida albicans and Their Impact on the Diagnosis of Antifungal Resistance

Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) of clinical isolates is a tool in routine diagnostics to facilitate decision making on optimal antifungal therapy. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)-phenomena (trailing and paradoxical effects (PXE)) observed in AFST complicate the unambiguous and reproducible determination of MICs and the impact of these phenomena on in vivo outcome are not fully understood. We aimed to link the MIC-phenomena with in vivo treatment response using the alternative infection model Galleria mellonella. We found that Candida albicans strains exhibiting PXE for caspofungin (CAS) had variable treatment outcomes in the Galleria model. In contrast, C. albicans strains showing trailing for voriconazole failed to respond in vivo. Caspofungin- and voriconazole-susceptible C. albicans strains responded to the respective antifungal therapy in vivo. In conclusion, MIC data and subsequent susceptibility interpretation of strains exhibiting PXE and/or trailing should be carried out with caution, as both effects are linked to drug adaptation and treatment response is uncertain to predict.

Combination treatment of invasive fungal infections

The persistence of high morbidity and mortality from systemic fungal infections despite the availability of novel antifungals points to the need for effective treatment strategies. Treatment of invasive fungal infections is often hampered by drug toxicity, tolerability, and specificity issues, and added complications often arise due to the lack of diagnostic tests and to treatment complexities. Combination therapy has been suggested as a possible approach to improve treatment outcome. In this article, we undertake a historical review of studies of combination therapy and also focus on recent studies involving newly approved antifungal agents. The limitations surrounding antifungal combinations include nonuniform interpretation criteria, inability to predict the likelihood of clinical success, strain variability, and variations in pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties of antifungals used in combination. The issue of antagonism between polyenes and azoles is beginning to be addressed, but data regarding other drug combinations are not adequate for us to draw definite conclusions. However, recent data have identified potentially useful combinations. Standardization of assay methods and adoption of common interpretive criteria are essential to avoid discrepancies between different in vitro studies. Larger clinical trials are needed to assess whether combination therapy improves survival and treatment outcome in the most seriously debilitated patients afflicted with life-threatening fungal infections.

Susceptibility testing of fungi--current status and open questions

The increase of fungal infections and the improvement of therapeutical options demand reliable antifungal susceptibility testing. In vitro susceptibility testing of fungi--in contrast to bacteria--is not yet established as a routine method. The NCCIS (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) guidelines for susceptibility testing of yeasts (and proposed for hyphomycetes) are most important for standardization. Meanwhile, essential parts of this test procedure are accepted, but it should still be improved. The concept of using only one test medium for all drugs and test organisms is not realized so far. There are also some test situations that prevent the NCCLS standard from being applied. Based on our experience, this article describes the NCCLS methods and their modifications. It places emphasis on lipophilic drugs showing controversies despite standardization. Furthermore, the prediction of MICs on the clinical outcome is discussed. Since there are some pitfalls in testing antifungals, this should be done in experienced laboratories only. The MIC has to be regarded as only one, but an important, factor in the management of fungal diseases. Host-, drug-, and pathogen-specific data should be considered simultaneously.

In vitro susceptibility of yeasts for fluconazole and itraconazole. Evaluation of a microdilution test

In vitro susceptibilities were determined for a total of 159 clinical isolates and 12 reference strains of yeasts belonging to different Candida species including 94 Candida albicans strains, and further genera such as Cryptococcus, Trichosporon, Geotrichum and Saccharomyces. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for fluconazole and itraconazole were assessed using a microdilution technique with the semisynthetic high resolution (HR) medium supplemented with glucose and asparagine but without sodium hydrogen carbonate (pH 7.0), according to a proposal of the working group 'Clinical Mycology' of the German Speaking Mycological Society. Fluconazole MIC values for C. albicans were between 0.125 and > or = 128 micrograms ml-1. Thus, the median of 1 microgram ml-1 showed that the overall fluconazole susceptibility was good. As expected, Candida krusei (seven strains) exhibited diminished in vitro susceptibility with MIC values for fluconazole of 8 to 128 micrograms ml-1 with a median of 64 micrograms ml-1. Some Candida kefyr strains seemed to be less susceptible against fluconazole which was indicated by a MIC90 of 64 micrograms ml-1. Surprisingly, no Candida glabrata isolate exhibited a MIC value greater than 16 micrograms ml-1. Other Candida species, Trichosporon cutaneum, Geotrichum candidum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae showed low MICs to fluconazole. In vitro susceptibility testing of itraconazole revealed that all Candida species except C. albicans, but also Trichosporon cutaneum, Geotrichum candidum, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae exhibited acceptable low MIC values against itraconazole (0.03-2 micrograms ml-1). Their MIC90 values for itraconazole were in the close range between 0.125 and 2 micrograms ml-1. MIC values between 0.125 and 2 micrograms ml-1 were obtained, even for C. krusei strains. On the other hand, the range of C. albicans MICs was between 0.0125 and > or = 16 micrograms ml-1 with MIC50 and MIC90 values of 0.125 and > or = 16 micrograms ml-1, respectively, indicating that a considerable number of yeast strains have high MICs. The comparative evaluation of different experimental conditions revealed that there exists a marked influence both of inoculum size and incubation time on the results of susceptibility testing. Therefore, for routine usage 10(2) CFU ml-1 and 18-24 h incubation time for this microdilution method with HR medium are recommended.

Case report. Osteomyelitis caused by high resistant Candida guilliermondii

We describe a case of a 57-year-old patient with osteomyelitis at a finger of his right hand caused by Candida guilliermondii. The strains isolated were highly resistant to fluconazole and itraconazole. Using the three methods, microdilution, agardilation and E-test, the highest minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) amounted to > 256 micrograms ml-1 for fluconazole and > 32 micrograms ml-1 for itraconazole. To our knowledge, this is the first time such high values have been described for C. guilliermondii. They correlated with the therapeutic non-response to a triazole therapy in our patient. The patient was cured by partial amputation of the affected finger.

Azole resistance in Candida

Resistance of Candida to azoles is an increasing problem. Susceptibility testing of Candida against fluconazole and ketoconazole is now feasible and desirable. Good correlation of resistance in vitro with clinical failure of fluconazole therapy has now been shown in mucosal candidiasis. The relationship, if any, between resistance and clinical failure in the context of invasive candidiasis is not clear at present and additional correlative work needs to be done. Monitoring of resistance trends in Candida is clearly important now.

[Susceptibility testing of fluconazole: evaluation of a multicenter study of the working group "Clinical Mycology" of the German Speaking Mycological Society]

In a collaborative study for in vitro testing of fluconazole against clinical yeast isolates participated 21 laboratories of the working group "Clinical Mycology" of the German Speaking Mycological Society. In these centers, according to a standard test protocol 1181 clinical isolates from 1033 patients were tested to their susceptibility against fluconazole by microdilution, agar diffusion and partly by agar dilution. Approximately 600 strains (59.1%) of the collective of 1106 isolates sent to a reference center underwent retesting in one laboratory (center 13). These strains demonstrated almost the same species distribution as the total collective. For 80% of all isolates a MIC of < or = 4 micrograms/ml and for 90% of the Candida albicans strains a MIC of < or = 2 micrograms/ml has been determined. Only approx, 9% of all isolates (4% with Candida albicans) showed a MIC of < or = 25 micrograms/ml. By parallel testing of 10 control strains issued by the reference center to the laboratories, the inter- and intra-laboratory comparability of the susceptibility testing of fluconazole was checked. The results demonstrated that under appropriate technical prerequisites and standardised test conditions, the methods used routinely in bacteriology microdilution, agar dilution and agar diffusion may also be applied in a reproducible way in the routine mycological laboratory for the susceptibility testing of yeasts.

[Susceptibility testing of yeasts against fluconazole: proposal for a standardized agar diffusion method with 25 microgram fluconazole paper discs]

This paper gives a proposal for a standardised agar diffusion susceptibility testing method with 25 micrograms fluconazole discs. The methodology compiles the results of several years of work to develop a reliable and reproducible routine-method for the microbiology laboratory. In this proposal, in addition, the critics and experiences of a collaborative study for susceptibility testing of fluconazole with 21 laboratories from Germany and Austria are included.

[In vitro susceptibility testing of Candida species against fluconazole using the microdilution test with Alamar Blue]

The investigation of susceptibility of Candida species to fluconazole was performed in microdilution to a supplemented HR-medium. The sufficient reproducibility of the test was verified using special control isolates and isolates of patients. The excellent applicability of the method in routine diagnostics was evaluated by in vitro testing of susceptibility of 279 Candida isolates from patients being colonised or suffering from endomycoses. The Candida species showed different susceptibility against fluconazole: 96% of the C. albicans isolates were sensitive, 55% of the C. glabrata isolates had a reduced sensitivity, and 26% were resistant against fluconazole (MIC > 25 micrograms/ml). C. krusei isolates were highly resistant (9 of 11 strains).

[Susceptibility testing of yeasts against fluconazole: comparison of the Etest method with microdilution and agar dilution]

In bacteriology, the Etest has a broad field of application in bacteriology and is recently available for the antimycotics fluconazole and itraconazole. By means of the presence of gradient concentrations of the active substance on the carrier material, it is possible to obtain reproducible MICs of the antimycotic substances. The results of susceptibility testing of 326 clinical yeast isolates with the Etest were compared to those MICs obtained by microdilution and agar dilution. A 100% concordance of the MIC markers (mode-, MIC50- and MIC90-value, standard deviation of the mean log2-MIC-dilution steps) was given when compared by a +/- 1 MIC-dilution step range with microdilution and by +/- 2 MIC-dilution steps with agar dilution; species dependent all strains were within 2 x standard deviation of the individual MIC-mean of the species. By comparison of the individual MIC-values maximum differences of +/- 6 MIC-dilution steps were obtained, where 70% of all results were within +/- 2 MIC-dilution steps, and more than 92% of all strains were within +/- 3 MIC-dilution steps. The Pearson's correlation coefficients show a good agreement of the Etest with microdilution (r = 0.92) resp., agar dilution (r = 0.88) demonstrate, however, clearly insufficient correlations (r < 0.65) to the reference methods, for species with difficult to read Etest inhibition zones (e.g., Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis). The differences between the proposed test methods recommended by the NCCLS and the working group "Clinical Mycology" of the German Speaking Mycological Society (AG-KMYK) are tabled.

[The Etest--an alternative to the NCLLS standard for susceptibility testing of yeasts?]

The Etest and the NCCLS method are not much differing in respect to their reproducibility. Only single observations exist on the clinical correlation of both tests. The correlation between both tests are known as being dependent on the yeast species and antifungals used. Due to the easy and simple handling the Etest is attractive for routine laboratories. The Etest has to be more evaluated before it can be generally recommended. The NCCLS method also is not validated until now. Different test methods should be compared thoroughly with the above mentioned standard.