Non-invasive prediction of the degree of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C using an ultrasound contrast agent. A pilot study

Characteristics and Echogenicity of Clinical Ultrasound Contrast Agents: An In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison Study

OBJECTIVES

To compare physicochemical characteristics and in vitro and in vivo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging performance of 3 commercially available ultrasound contrast agents: SonoVue (Bracco Imaging SpA, Colleretto Giacosa, Italy; also marketed as Lumason in the USA), Definity (Lantheus Medical Imaging, North Billerica, MA) and Optison (GE Healthcare AS, Oslo, Norway).

METHODS

Physicochemical characteristics were measured with a Multisizer Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Two ultrasound systems (Aplio 500; Toshiba Medical Systems Corp, Tochigi-ken, Japan; and Logiq E9; GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, England) were used with different transducers. Contrast enhancement was measured in vitro by dose-ranging measurements using a custom-built beaker setup; in vivo imaging performances were compared in pigs (heart and liver) and rabbits (liver). Quantitative analyses were performed with VueBox quantification software (Bracco Suisse SA, Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland).

RESULTS

Measured physicochemical characteristics were in agreement with those provided by the manufacturers. In vitro data demonstrated that the performance of SonoVue was similar to or better than that of Definity but superior to Optison (normalized scattered power 2- to 10-fold higher with SonoVue). Similar results were obtained in vivo, although the duration of enhancement in the pig heart was longer for SonoVue compared to Definity, and quantitative analysis revealed higher enhancement for SonoVue (1.5-fold increase). For liver imaging, SonoVue and Definity showed similar contrast enhancement and duration of enhancement, but compared to Optison, both peak enhancement and duration of enhancement were superior for SonoVue (up to 2-fold increase).

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging performance of SonoVue was similar to or slightly better than that of Definity, but it was superior to Optison for the conditions used in this study.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computerized tomography perfusion imaging of a liver fibrosis-early cirrhosis in dogs

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To assess liver fibrosis stages in a liver fibrosis-early cirrhosis model in dogs, the clinical efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and computed tomography (CT) perfusion imaging were compared.

METHODS

Hepatic vein arriving time (HVAT), hepatic artery arriving time, and hepatic artery to vein transit time (HA-VTT) were measured on CEUS. Total liver perfusion (TLP), portal vein perfusion (PVP), hepatic artery perfusion, and hepatic perfusion index (HPI) were measured on CT perfusion imaging. Histologic examination of liver specimens of the animals was performed to assess the fibrosis stage.

RESULTS

For assessment of liver fibrosis, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of CEUS indexes HVAT and HA-VTT were 0.865 and 0.930, respectively; the perfusion CT indexes TLP, PVP, and HPI were 0.797, 0.800, and 0.220, respectively; the serological index hyaluronic acid was 0.793. While for assessment of early cirrhosis, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of CEUS indexes HVAT and HA-VTT were 0.915 and 0.948, respectively; the perfusion CT indexes TLP, PVP, and HPI were 0.737, 0.765, and 0.218, respectively; the serological index hyaluronic acid was 0.627.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that both CEUS and CT perfusion imaging have the potential to be complementary imaging tools in the evaluation of liver fibrosis. While CEUS is the better choice and the index HA-VTT can be considered as non-invasive semi-quantitative indexes for diagnosing liver fibrosis and early cirrhosis.

Liver Function Assessment Using Parenchyma-Specific Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

The aim of this study was to assess hepatic functional reserve by analyzing the hepatic parenchyma enhancement curve of parenchyma-specific contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). Fifty-two patients with cirrhosis who underwent CEUS and indocyanine green tests (ICG) because of a focal liver lesion were enrolled. We evaluated the hemodynamic-related parameters of the time-intensity curve and compared these findings with the ICG retention rate at 15 min (ICG R15). The correlation between the time from peak to one half (s) and ICG R15 was statistically significant and was relatively proportional to the ICG R15. A cut-off value of 149 s was determined for the time from peak to one half for abnormal ICG R15 (>14). The sensitivity and specificity were 85.7% and 92.3%, respectively, for the detection of abnormal ICG R15. In conclusion, the time from peak to one half of the time-intensity curve of parenchyma-specific CEUS of the liver can be a useful parameter to predict the hepatic reserve in liver cirrhosis.

Latest developments in the imaging of fibrotic liver disease

According to the World Health Organization, liver cirrhosis accounted for 1.8% of all deaths in Europe, causing about 170,000 deaths per year. Approximately 29 million persons in the EU suffer from chronic liver disease and this trend is on the rise. Liver disease is the EU's fifth most common cause of death accounting for at least one in six deaths. Early detection and monitoring of fibrosis has the potential to direct management of these chronic liver diseases and avert morbidity and mortality. Although the available techniques are in their infancy and the very early stages of fibrosis are difficult to detect, there have been significant advances in imaging over the last decade that has resulted in the use of these new imaging techniques being introduced into the patient pathway. This review explores the accuracies of these imaging techniques, their role in the management of patients, and the potential for the future.

Noninvasive diagnosis of compensated cirrhosis using an analysis of the time-intensity curve portal vein slope gradient on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

Purpose

We measured the slope gradients (SGs) of the vascular time–intensity curves (TICs) of the intrahepatic vessels on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the SG of each hepatic vessel, particularly the portal vein (PV), for detecting cirrhosis and to compare this method with conventional modalities.

Methods

Fifty-one preoperative patients underwent CEUS, and the TICs were plotted. The SGs of the hepatic artery, PV and hepatic vein were obtained from the linear functions between the slope of the arrival time of the contrast agent and the peak enhancement time of each vessel. The transit times and levels of biochemical markers were also measured. The patients were divided into three groups according to the Metavir score: F0/1 group (n = 14), F2/3 group (n = 21) and F4 group (n = 16).

Results

The PVSG significantly decreased in the F4 group (F0/1: 29.1 ± 2.27, F2/3: 23.1 ± 1.86, F4: 14.7 ± 2.13). The PVSG demonstrated high accuracy for diagnosing cirrhosis and was correlated with the levels of ICG-R15 and hyaluronic acid (Spearman rank correlation; ρ = −0.5691, p < 0.001 and ρ = −0.4652, p = 0.0006).

Conclusions

The PVSG has the potential to be a diagnostic marker for identifying patients with well-compensated cirrhosis.

Evaluation of Chronic Liver Disease: Does Ultrasound Scoring Criteria Help?

Noninvasive approaches for assessment of liver histology include routine laboratory tests and radiological evaluation. The purpose of our study was to determine the utility of a simplified scoring system based on routinely evaluated ultrasound features for the evaluation of chronic liver disease and correlate it with the histological findings. For this cross-sectional analytical study the data was collected prospectively by nonprobability purposive sampling technique. The ultrasound variables/parameters and their assigned scoring system that was a modified version adopted from published literature were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the liver morphological score and combined score of liver morphology and sizes was determined using stage and grade as reference standard. Our results show a high sensitivity and PPV of liver morphological sonographic evaluation for the staging and grading of CLD respectively thus supporting it as a screening diagnostic strategy. Of the three liver morphology variables, specificity of liver surface evaluation was highest for the stage of fibrosis and grade of inflammation. The simplified ultrasound scoring system evaluated in our study is clinically relevant and reproducible for differentiating patients with CLD with mild or no fibrosis from moderate to severe fibrosis.

Evaluation of liver fibrosis by investigation of hepatic parenchymal perfusion using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: an animal study

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of assessing the hepatic parenchymal perfusion in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for evaluating liver fibrosis, using an animal model.

METHODS

Seventy Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into experimental (n = 35) and control (n = 35) groups. In the experimental group, liver fibrosis was induced by intraperitoneal injection of carbon tetrachloride. CEUS of the liver was performed at a 2-week interval for 14 weeks. Signal intensity of liver parenchyma was analyzed with time-intensity curves. Histologic examination of liver specimens of the animals was performed to assess the fibrosis stage.

RESULTS

The peak signal intensity of hepatic parenchymal perfusion in stage 2-3 fibrosis was significantly lower than that in stage 0-1. The time to peak intensity of hepatic parenchymal perfusion was significantly longer in the experimental group than the control group, and in the stage 3 fibrosis than in stages 0-2 fibrosis. Using time to peak intensity of hepatic parenchymal perfusion to distinguish stage 3 fibrosis and stages 0-2 fibrosis, the optimum cutoff was 75,000 milliseconds with the sensitivity and specificity of 67% and 78%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This animal study showed that CEUS has the potential to be a complementary imaging tool in the evaluation of liver fibrosis.

Assessment of portal venous index as a non-invasive method for diagnosing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C

CONTEXT: Hepatitis C is an important cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. The grading of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C is important for better clinical management. However, until now, liver biopsy is the only test accepted for this purpose, despite their contraindications and complications. New methods for non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis are under investigation. One proposal is the Doppler ultrasound, as a non-invasive, widely available and inexpensive. OBJECTIVE: To compare Doppler parameters of portal vein in patients with chronic hepatitis C with a healthy control group and to correlate these parameters with fibrosis degree obtained by liver biopsy. METHODS: Fifty patients with chronic hepatitis C submitted to liver biopsy and 44 healthy controls had Doppler of the portal vein performed, with the calculation of the portal venous index. We conducted a comparison between the averages of the two groups of portal venous index. For the correlation between portal venous index and fibrosis was employed the Spearman test. RESULTS: There was a difference between the average portal venous index between controls (0.33 ± 0.07) and patients (0.23 ± 0.09) with P<0.001. No difference was observed between the portal venous index in patients with chronic hepatitis C who have significant fibrosis or not. The correlation between the portal venous index and fibrosis degree was reverse and moderate (r =-0.448 P<0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 78.4% (95% CI: 68.8% to 88%). The cutoff for the portal venous index was 0.28 with sensitivity of 73.5% and specificity of 71.1%. CONCLUSION: The portal venous index was useful in distinguishing healthy patients from patients with CHC. However, there was no significant difference in the quantification of degree of fibrosis.

Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing the degree of hepatic fibrosis

AIM: To evaluate the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in assessing the degree of liver fibrosis.

METHODS: Seventy patients with chronic hepatitis and 20 healthy controls were included in the study. According to the Scheuer scoring system for staging liver fibrosis, 70 patients were divided into mild fibrosis group (n = 15), moderate fibrosis group (n = 29) and cirrhosis group (n = 26). In pulse-inversion mode, the ultrasound contrast agent (SonoVue 2.4 mL) was injected intravenously. The contrast-enhanced ultrasound dynamic images at 90 s were acquired for offline analysis. The arrival time of the contrast material in the hepatic artery (HA), portal vein (PV) and hepatic vein (HV) and peak time in the liver parenchyma were recorded. Intrahepatic transit time was calculated as the differences in the arrival time between the hepatic artery and hepatic vein (HA-HVTT), between the PV and HV (PV-HVTT), and between the PA and HV (PA-HVTT). All the parameters were compared among different groups of patients.

RESULTS: In the mild fibrosis group, the arrival time in the hepatic vein (28.63 s ± 3.14 s) was longer than in the control group (28.63 s ± 3.14 s vs 26.27 s ± 1.74 s, P >0.05) though there was no significant difference between the two groups. The arrival time in the hepatic vein in the moderate fibrosis group (23.11 s ± 1.34 s) and cirrhosis group (20.56 s ± 3.37 s) were significantly shorter than that in the mild fibrosis group and control group (both P < 0.05). The peak time in the liver parenchyma in the moderate fibrosis and cirrhosis groups showed a later onset than that in the control group (40.53 s ± 4.63 s, 46.78 s ± 5.56 s vs 34.13 s ± 2.76 s, both P < 0.05). Although no statistical significant differences in HA-HVTT, PV-HVTT and PA-HVTT were observed among the three groups, they decreased with the aggravation of liver fibrosis in the moderate fibrosis and cirrhosis groups (all P < 0.05). Intrahepatic transit times (HA-HVTT, PV-HVTT and PA-HVTT) correlated negatively with the severity of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound can be used to quantitatively judge the severity of liver fibrosis.

Noninvasive analysis of portal pressure by contrast-enhanced sonography in patients with cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES

Free portal pressure measurement is a reliable method for assessment of portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis. Intrahepatic circulatory time analysis of a sonographic contrast agent can assess liver fibrosis and its severity. The purposes of this pilot study were to assess the correlation between the intrahepatic circulatory time and free portal pressure and to assess whether intrahepatic circulatory time analysis can be used to predict portal venous pressure severity.

METHODS

The intrahepatic circulatory time and free portal pressure were measured in 31 patients with hepatitis B virus-related liver disease. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation between the intrahepatic circulatory time and free portal pressure.

RESULTS

The hepatic vein-hepatic artery interval times were significantly shorter in the portal hypertension group than the non-portal hypertension group (mean ± SD, 8.26 ± 1.94 and 13.83 ± 1.17 seconds, respectively; P < .001). The portal vein-hepatic artery interval times were significantly longer in the portal hypertension group than the nonportal hypertension group (13.13 ± 2.25 and 7.25 ± 1.81 seconds; P < .001). Considering the whole patient population, there were statistically significant correlations between free portal pressure and the hepatic vein-hepatic artery interval time (r = -0.900; P < .001) and portal vein-hepatic artery interval time (r = 0.808; P < .001). In patients with portal hypertension, there was a statistically significant correlation between free portal pressure and the hepatic vein-hepatic artery interval time (r = -0.804; P = .009) and a weak correlation between free portal pressure and the portal vein-hepatic artery interval time (r = 0.506; P = .036).

CONCLUSIONS

Intrahepatic circulatory time measurement is correlated with free portal pressure and has the potential capability to evaluate portal pressure noninvasively in patients with hepatitis B virus-related liver disease.

Liver contrast enhanced ultrasound perfusion imaging in the evaluation of chronic hepatitis C fibrosis: preliminary results

We wanted to determine whether liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-derived peak signal intensity (PSI) and peak signal intensity/time (PIT) predict liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Forty-nine patients with CHC (METAVIR classification) and 10 control subjects were included in the study. After a bolus of 2.4 mL SonoVue (Bracco Imaging, Milan, Italy) solution was injected into a peripheral vein, the right lobe of the liver containing the right portal vein was scanned in a transverse section. Two-dimensional sonography was performed using the Philips iU22 ultrasound system (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands). A 1.0-5.0-MHz (C5-1) wideband convex transducer was used, applying the following settings in all cases. Regions of interest were manually drawn over the right liver lobe and over the portal vein (PV). Liver parenchyma PSI (LPpsi) and PIT (LPpit), portal vein PSI (PVpsi) and PIT (PVpit) were automatically calculated. δPSI was defined as the difference between PVpsi and LPpsi. A significant correlation was observed between PA(PSI) and fibrosis scores. When patients were stratified according to their LPpsi, a significant difference was achieved only between patients with fibrosis score 0-1 vs. 2-3 and 2 vs. 4. Statistically significant differences between all fibrosis scores, except 0 vs. 1 and 3 vs. 4 were observed when δPSI was used to stratify patients. Overall diagnostic accuracy of LPpsi and δPSI measurement for severe fibrosis by area under the receiving operator characteristic curve analysis was, respectively, 0.87 and 0.88. We suggest that liver CEUS perfusion could have the potential to be used as a complementary tool for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. However, further large-scale studies are required to accurately assess its accuracy in the evaluation of liver fibrosis.

Haemodynamic evaluation by Doppler ultrasonography in patients with portal hypertension: a review

Doppler ultrasonography (US) has an advantage of being non-invasive; therefore, several attempts have been made to investigate the haemodynamic alterations in cirrhosis and the response to medical treatment of portal hypertension. Doppler indices, which have been commonly used for the evaluation of portal hypertension, include the measurement of portal and splenic venous blood velocity and flows, and the resistive and pulsatility index at hepatic, splenic, renal, superior mesenteric artery. Although many positive evidences have been suggested, its clinical usefulness in portal hypertension remains unsettled because of being plagued by lack of reproducibility and accuracy characterized by intra- and interobserver variation. However, recently, Doppler's usefulness in assessment of severity of portal hypertension in terms of reproducibility, technical ease and accuracy and response to drugs that reduce the portal pressure has been proposed. In addition, because most of the patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension have intrahepatic shunts, they show a decrease in intrahepatic circulatory time (IHCT). Doppler US using microbubble contrast agents allows measurement of IHCT. Therefore, application of contrast-enhanced Doppler US can be prospective for the assessment of the severity of portal hypertension. Several reports have demonstrated that colour Doppler endoscopic US enable haemodynamic study to assess the portal hypertension and has a role of guidance to measure the imaging-based variceal pressure. We have reviewed briefly the clinical usefulness of Doppler US in assessing the severity of portal hypertension and its response to treatment.

Optimal combinations of ultrasound-based and serum markers of disease severity in patients with chronic hepatitis C

Combinations of noninvasive markers may improve discrimination of chronic liver disease severity. The aims of this study were to compare four validated serum and ultrasound-based markers of hepatic disease severity head-to-head with liver biopsy and to assess optimal combinations with consideration of cost. A total of 67 patients with biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis C underwent all four techniques on the same visit [aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI); Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) panel; transient elastography (TE) and ultrasound microbubble hepatic transit times (HTT)]. Markers were combined according to increasing financial cost and ordinal regression used to determine contributions. APRI, ELF, TE and HTT predicted cirrhosis with diagnostic accuracy of 86%, 91%, 90% and 83% respectively. ELF and TE were the most reliable tests with an intra-class correlation of 0.94 each. Either ELF or TE significantly enhanced the prediction of fibrosis stage when combined with APRI, but when combined together, did not improve the model further. Addition of third or fourth markers did not significantly improve prediction of fibrosis. Combination of APRI with either ELF or TE effectively predicts fibrosis stage, but combinations of three or more tests lead to redundancy of information and increased cost.

Intrahepatic transit time predicts liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: quantitative assessment with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

We investigated the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with quantitative measurements to assess the stages of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. One-hundred twenty-two patients with chronic hepatitis B were divided into three groups according to the Scheuer scoring system pathologically and according to clinical evidence: mild fibrosis (S0 and S1, n = 36); moderate fibrosis (S2 and S3, n = 24); and cirrhosis (S4 and clinically typical cirrhosis, n = 62). CEUS of hepatic vessels and parenchyma was performed using the Cadence contrast pulse sequencing technique, with an intravenous bolus injection of a contrast agent (SonoVue). Real-time CEUS imaging of the liver was recorded and analyzed offline. Contrast arrival time, baseline, and peak intensity in the hepatic artery, portal vein, right hepatic vein, and liver parenchyma were used to calculate intrahepatic transit times, hepatic artery to hepatic vein transit time (HA-HVTT) and portal vein to hepatic vein transit time (PV-HVTT), as well as increased signal intensity (ISI). The correlations between these quantitative parameters and the stages of fibrosis were analyzed using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. HA-HVTT and PV-HVTT were shortened gradually with the progression of liver fibrosis. PV-HVTT was statistically significant differences existed between the two paired groups (mild vs. moderate vs. cirrhosis groups, p < 0.001), whereas HA-HVTT was changed significantly between mild and moderate or cirrhosis groups (p < 0.001). HA-HVTT and PV-HVTT changes were significantly correlated with liver fibrosis severity (r = -0.5930, p < 0.001; r = -0.8215, p < 0.001). Area under receiver operating characteristic curves for HA-HVTT and PV-HVTT were 0.891 +/- 0.034 and 0.955 +/- 0.020 at fibrosis scores >or=S2, and 0.785 +/- 0.040 and 0.946 +/- 0.018 at fibrosis score >or=S4, respectively. ISI values in the portal vein and liver parenchyma decreased with the severity of fibrosis. This study demonstrated that hepatic CEUS with quantitative measurements of intrahepatic transit time reflected the severity of liver fibrosis. The real-time CEUS imaging with use of software-based quantitative analysis could provide reliable information of hepatic hemodynamic changes to noninvasively assess the severity of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Non-invasive evaluation of liver cirrhosis using ultrasound

Ultrasound (US) is essential in both assessment of the potentially cirrhotic liver and surveillance of selected patients with chronic hepatitis as liver biopsy can be misleading or inaccurate in up to 25% of cases. Various techniques are already in routine use, such as grey-scale imaging, Doppler US, and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), while newer techniques such as elastography and hepatic vein transit time (HVTT) have the potential to exclude patients without significant fibrosis or cirrhosis; however, they are operator dependent and require specific software. Grey-scale imaging may demonstrate changes, such as volume redistribution, capsule nodularity, parenchymal nodularity, and echotexture changes. The Doppler findings in the hepatic and portal veins, hepatic artery, and varices allow assessment of liver cirrhosis. However, the operator needs to be aware of limitations of these techniques. Low mechanical index CEUS plays an important role in the assessment of complications of cirrhosis, such as hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein thrombus. Optimized US technique is crucial for accurate diagnosis of the cirrhotic liver and its complications.

Liver fibrosis staging with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: prospective multicenter study compared with METAVIR scoring

We prospectively assessed contrast-enhanced sonography for evaluating the degree of liver fibrosis as diagnosed via biopsy in 99 patients. The transit time of microbubbles between the portal and hepatic veins was calculated from the difference between the arrival time of the microbubbles in each vein. Liver biopsy was obtained for each patient within 6 months of the contrast-enhanced sonography. Histological fibrosis was categorized into two classes: (1) no or moderate fibrosis (F0, F1, and F2 according to the METAVIR staging) or (2) severe fibrosis (F3 and F4). At a cutoff of 13 s for the transit time, the diagnosis of severe fibrosis was made with a specificity of 78.57%, a sensitivity of 78.95%, a positive predictive value of 78.33%, a negative predictive value of 83.33%, and a performance accuracy of 78.79%. Therefore, contrast-enhanced ultrasound can help with differentiation between moderate and severe fibrosis.