Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients

Pediatric unsedated transnasal endoscopy: applications, equipment, and future directions

Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is a valuable tool to diagnose and treat GI conditions. Traditional pediatric GI endoscopy uses sedation or general anesthesia, with associated risks of cardiopulmonary compromise and social and economic costs like school or work absence. Unsedated, transnasal endoscopy is an approach that mitigates these disadvantages but provides similar diagnostic benefit to conventional endoscopy. Ongoing advances in the field of pediatric transnasal endoscopy will be driven by an enhanced understanding of current indications, available equipment, procedural comfort strategies, and recent developments in new diagnostic and therapeutic uses.

Diagnostic Performance of a Novel Ultra-Thin Endoscopy under Narrow-Band Imaging for Superficial Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Pharynx and Esophagus

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the ultra-thin endoscope (UTE) for superficial squamous cell carcinoma (SSCC) compared to magnifying endoscopy (ME) under narrow-band imaging. Participants underwent endoscopic examination, and images of pharyngeal and esophageal SCCs, as along with suspicious SSCC lesions, were collected using UTE and ME on the same day. Three image catalogs (UTE, ME-1, and ME-2) were created and reviewed by three expert endoscopists. ME-1 and ME-2 contained the same endoscopic images. The primary endpoint was the intra-observer agreement for diagnosing SCC. Eighty-six lesions (SCC = thirty-nine, non-SCC = forty-seven) in 43 participants were identified. The kappa values for the intra-observer agreement between UTE and ME-1 vs. the control (ME-1 vs. ME-2) were 0.74 vs. 0.84, 0.63 vs. 0.76, and 0.79 vs. 0.88, respectively. The accuracies for diagnosing SCC by UTE and ME-1 were 87.2% vs. 86.0%, 78.0% vs. 73,2%, and 75.6 vs. 82.6%, respectively, with no significant differences (p > 0.05). The rates of lesions that were diagnosed with confidence by UTE and ME-1 were 30.2% vs. 27.9%, 55.8% vs. 62.8%, and 58.1% vs. 55.8%, respectively. UTE demonstrates substantial diagnostic performance for SSCC in the pharynx and esophagus.

A single-center prospective study on pain alleviation during peroral upper endoscopy with an ultrathin endoscope

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of transnasal endoscopy using an ultrathin endoscope has been reported in several studies. However, few studies regarding peroral endoscopy with ultrathin endoscopes with high resolution have been reported. This study investigates the pain alleviation of peroral endoscopy with an ultrathin endoscope.

METHODS

Patients with a history of peroral endoscopy using a conventional, normal-diameter scope with no sedation who underwent peroral esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) using a thin scope between April-July 2022 were included in this study. After the procedure, the patients completed a questionnaire evaluating pain during the examination and willingness to repeat the procedure. The physicians were surveyed regarding their level of satisfaction. The primary endpoint was patient satisfaction, which corresponded to the rate of patients who rated the thin endoscope as more comfortable or somewhat more comfortable than the previously-used, conventional endoscope.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-five patients were included in the analyses. Patient satisfaction was achieved in 86.2% (125/145) of patients. The median visual analog scale pain score was 3 (0-7) points in this study, which is significantly lower than the pain score after the previous endoscopy (5 (0-10) points; p < 0.001). In addition, 96% (24/25) of patients who underwent EGD by an expert and 95.8% (115/120) who underwent EGD by a non-expert were willing to repeat endoscopy using the thin scope (p = 0.69).

CONCLUSION

Peroral endoscopy using a thin scope reduces patient pain regardless of the endoscopist's experience.

Present status and the future of ultrathin endoscopy

Endoscopic population-based screening for gastric cancer began in April 2016, and the use of transnasal ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscopy (UT-EGD) has rapidly become popular. With UT-EGD, discomfort associated with an examination is reduced, patient satisfaction is high, and adverse effects on cardiopulmonary function are fewer. Consequently, UT-EGD is a good option for gastric screening in an aging society. Because of the narrower diameter of the endoscope, however, image quality is inferior to that obtained using transoral conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy (C-EGD). As a result, lesions observed by UT-EGD must be viewed at close proximity and chromoendoscopy should be used concurrently, which is burdensome for the endoscopist. Recent innovations by endoscope manufacturers have enabled dramatic improvements in transnasal UT-EGD and facilitated Hi-Vision imaging. Furthermore, image enhancement that allows for observation on a par with transoral C-EGD is now feasible. In the future, UT-EGD will be equipped with functions that permit magnified endoscopic image. It is anticipated that a multiroute transition between transnasal and transoral UT-EGD will become possible.

Improved detection of early gastric cancer with linked color imaging using an ultrathin endoscope: a video-based analysis

Background and study aims  Ultrathin endoscopy causes a minimal gag reflex and has minimal effects on cardiopulmonary function. Linked color imaging (LCI) is useful for detection of malignancies in the digestive tract. The aim of this study was to clarify whether LCI with ultrathin endoscopy facilitates detection of early gastric cancer (EGC) despite its lower resolution compared with high-resolution white light imaging (WLI) with standard endoscopy. Patients and methods  This was a retrospective analysis with prospectively collected video, including consecutive 166 cases of EGC or gastric atrophy alone. Ninety seconds of screening video was collected using standard and ultrathin endoscopes with both WLI and LCI for each case. Three expert endoscopists assessed each video and the sensitivity of detecting EGC calculated. Color difference calculations were performed. Results  Sensitivities using ultrathin WLI, ultrathin LCI, standard WLI, and standard LCI for the identification of cancer were 66.0 %, 80.3 %, 69.9 %, and 84.0 %, respectively. The color difference between malignant lesions and surrounding mucosa with ultrathin LCI and standard LCI were significantly higher than using ultrathin WLI or standard WLI, supported subjectively by the visibility score. Ultrathin LCI color difference and visibility score were significantly higher than standard WLI. Conclusions  LCI with a low-resolution ultrathin endoscope is superior to WLI with a high-resolution standard endoscope for gastric cancer screening. This suggests that the high color contrast between EGC and the surrounding mucosa is more important than high-resolution images.

Is Direct Laryngoscopy Obsolete? "Trans Nasal Oesophagoscopy" the Complete Endoscopic Solution in Head Neck Practice

Direct laryngoscopy (DL) is the standard of care for the evaluation of suspicious lesions in the larynx and hypo pharynx but requires general anaesthesia and a dedicated operation theatre. While DL offers us the ability to map the lesion adequately and take a biopsy, it requires workup for anaesthesia well as rigid oesophagoscopy for assessing the oesophagus with its associated complications. Sixty-nine patients underwent TNE under topical anaesthesia. The lesions were mapped and biopsies taken. Those patients who had an inadequate evaluation on TNE or negative biopsy underwent direct laryngoscopy. Completeness of evaluation, adequacy of biopsy, presence of synchronous oesophageal lesions and the modified Gloucester Comfort Score for patient comfort was documented. Amongst 69 cases enrolled for TNE evaluation, 97% of cases had an adequate mapping of disease extent, and 100% adequacy of biopsy material. General anaesthesia could be avoided in 92.75% of patients. TNE took a median time of 8 min. Synchronous oesophageal tumours were seen in 5.8% of patients. There were no complications and 74% patients did not experience any discomfort. TNE appears to be simple, safe, efficient office based diagnostic procedure. TNE has the potential to be the new standard of care making DL obsolete.

Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Mouthpiece for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Multi-Center, Randomized Study

This randomized trial aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the GAGLESS mouthpiece for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with that of the conventional mouthpiece. In all, 90 participants were divided into the GAGLESS mouthpiece and conventional mouthpiece groups. The primary endpoint was the severity of pain using the visual analog scale (VAS), and secondary endpoints were examination time, past history of endoscopy, success of the procedure, systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, oxygen saturation, pulse rate before and after EGD, and adverse events. Endoscopy was completed in all cases, and no complications were observed. VAS, when passing the scope through the pharynx, was 2.5 ± 2.4 and 2.0 ± 1.9 cm (p = 0.24) in the conventional and GAGLESS groups, respectively, and that, throughout the examination, was 2.5 ± 2.4 and 1.7 ± 1.5 cm (p = 0.06), respectively. The difference in blood pressure between the GAGLESS and conventional groups was not significant for SBP (p = 0.08) and significant for DBP (p = 0.03). The post-EGD difference in DBP was significantly lower in the GAGLESS group than in the conventional group. The results indicate that GAGLESS mouthpieces had a lower VAS during endoscopy than the conventional mouthpieces, and the changes in blood pressure were smaller with the GAGLESS mouthpiece.

Pre-screening for bariatric surgery patients: comparative effectiveness of transnasal endoscopy versus esophagogastroduodenoscopy

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic evaluation is frequently performed before bariatric surgery to identify foregut pathology that may alter procedure selection. Transnasal endoscopy (TNE) is an alternative to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The objective of this study was to compare TNE to EGD.

METHODS

Patients who underwent TNE or EGD before bariatric surgery from January 2012 through April 2019 were reviewed. Statistical analyses included Chi-square, Wilcoxon two-sample, and Fisher's exact tests. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Three hundred and forty-five patients underwent preoperative screening (63% EGD, 37% TNE) before bariatric surgery. Mean age and preoperative body mass index in the TNE and EGD groups were 46.2 ± 12.4 vs 45.5 ± 11.6 years (p = 0.58) and 46.5 ± 7.1 vs. 45.5 ± 6.1 kg/m² (p = 0.25), respectively. Three TNEs were aborted, resulting in a success rate of 98%. Of patients who underwent EGD, 1 (0.5%) visited the emergency department (ED), and 7 (3%) called the nurse with post-procedure concerns. There were no ED visits or nurse calls from patients who underwent TNE. The median total time in the procedure room was 77 (57-97) min for EGD vs. 26 (8-33) min for TNE (p < 0.001). One patient who underwent TNE required subsequent EGD. Mean charge per patient for EGD and TNE was $5034.70 and $1464.00, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TNE was associated with less post-procedure care, shorter procedure time and fewer charges compared to EGD. TNE could be considered an initial screening tool for patients undergoing bariatric surgery, while EGD could be used selectively in patients with abnormal TNE findings.

Novel mouthpiece for reducing the gag reflex during esophagogastroduodenoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Discomfort associated with the gag reflex during transoral endoscopy can be troublesome. To overcome this problem during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), we recently developed a novel mouthpiece. The aim of the present study was to compare acceptance and tolerability of transoral EGD with conventional and new mouthpieces in unsedated patients and analyze the effects of the new mouthpiece.

METHODS

This study consisted of two phases of cephalometric and EGD examinations to analyze the effects of the new mouthpiece. Cephalometry was carried out in six subjects to evaluate differences in the size of the pharynx (anteroposterior diameter of the oropharynx and longitudinal diameter of the oral cavity) when subjects held the conventional mouthpiece (MAJ674) or the new mouthpiece in their mouths. EGD was done in 10 subjects using the conventional or new mouthpiece to evaluate the number of times the gag reflex occurred, examinee discomfort, and endoscope operability during EGD using a visual analogue scale (VAS).

RESULTS

Anteroposterior diameter of the oropharynx and longitudinal diameter of the oral cavity were significantly larger with the new mouthpiece than with the conventional mouthpiece (oropharynx: P = 0.03; oral cavity: P = 0.03). With the new mouthpiece during EGD, subjects had significantly fewer instances of the gag reflex (P = 0.01); VAS score for discomfort was significantly lower (P < 0.01) and score for endoscope operability was significantly higher (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The new mouthpiece we developed reduced the gag reflex during EGD by extending the pharynx, thus decreasing examinee discomfort and increasing endoscopic operability.

Necessity of transnasal gastroscopy in routine diagnostics: a patient-centred requirement analysis

Introduction

Numerous indications require regular upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (oesophagogastroduodenoscopy; EGD) in outpatients. In most cases, peroral gastroscopy is performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the need of transnasal gastroscopy (nEGD) in outpatients.

Methods

A questionnaire was used to assess patients’ preferred choice of method, previous experience with EGD, psychological aspects and sociodemographic data. Furthermore, patient satisfaction with and potentially perceived discomfort during the examination as well as preference for a method in regard to future examinations was evaluated.

Results

From September 2016 to March 2017, a total of 283 outpatients at endoscopy of the University Hospital of Leipzig were approached to participate in the study. 196 patients were eligible, of whom 116 (60%) chose nEGD. For 87 patients (87/283, 31%) nEGD had to be excluded for medical reasons. The average age in the total sample was 53 (±17) years. 147 (77%) have had previous experience with peroral EGD (oEGD). Of the nEGD examined patients 83% were fairly up to extremely satisfied with the procedure. Satisfaction significantly predicted the choice of future EGD examinations. Nasal pain experienced during nEGDs was associated with rejection of nEGD in further EGD examinations (p<0.01). Patients who did choose a specific procedure were more likely to select the same procedure as their future preference (χ²= 73.6, df=1, p<0.001); this preference was unaffected by the procedure that had been chosen previously (reselecting nEGD: 84%, oEGD: 89%, p=0.874).

Conclusion

nEGD without sedation is a viable alternative. Patient satisfaction with nEGD is high, and reselection rate for nEGD is similar to that for oEGD. As a result of this study nEGD is now offered as a routine procedure at the University of Leipzig.

Trial registration number

NCT03663491.

Early gastric cancer diagnostic ability of ultrathin endoscope loaded with laser light source

BACKGROUND

Conventionally, the low luminous intensity, low image resolution, and difficulty in operation have been reported with the ultrathin endoscope. However, it has markedly advanced recently. The improvement of the diagnostic ability is expected.

AIM

To compare the early gastric cancer diagnostic ability of an ultrathin endoscope loaded with a laser light source and that of the conventional endoscope.

METHODS

The target subjects were 375 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopy at our hospital for post-endoscopic submucosal dissection follow-up of gastric cancer from January to August 2018. During endoscopy, the ultrathin endoscope was used in 140 patients (37.3%), and the conventional endoscope was used in 235 patients (62.7%). Patient background was adjusted using the propensity score matching method, and gastric cancer detection ability was evaluated in the two groups.

RESULTS

The gastric cancer detection rate was 7.8% in the ultrathin endoscope group and 7.0% in the conventional endoscope group, and the mean intragastric observation time was 4.1 ± 1.7 min in the ultrathin endoscope group and 4.1 ± 1.9 min in the conventional endoscope group, showing no significant differences between the groups. Moreover, the biopsy implementation rate was 31.8% in the ultrathin endoscope group and 41.1% in the conventional endoscope group, and the biopsy prediction rate was 17.9% and 13.2%, respectively, showing no significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The gastric cancer diagnostic ability of the ultrathin endoscope loaded with a laser light source was comparable to that of the conventional endoscope. The observation time was also comparable. Thus, endoscopy using the ultrathin endoscope loaded with the laser light source would be the first option in screening examinations of gastric cancer due to its low invasion.

Comparative Assessment of Patient Preferences and Tolerability in Barrett Esophagus Screening: Results From a Randomized Trial

GOALS

To determine patient preference for the Barrett esophagus (BE) screening techniques.

BACKGROUND

Sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (sEGD) and unsedated transnasal endoscopy (uTNE) are both potential techniques for BE screening. However, systematic assessment of patient preference for these 2 techniques is lacking. As part of a comparative effectiveness randomized trial of BE screening modalities, we measured short-term patient preferences for the following approaches: in-clinic uTNE (huTNE), mobile-based uTNE (muTNE), and sEGD using a novel assessment instrument.

STUDY

Consenting community patients without known BE were randomly assigned to receive huTNE, muTNE, or sEGD, followed by a telephone administered preference and tolerability assessment instrument 24 hours after study procedures. Patient preference was measured by the waiting trade-off method.

RESULTS

In total, 201 patients completed screening with huTNE (n=71), muTNE (n=71), or sEGD (n=59), and a telephone interview. Patients' preferences for sEGD and uTNE using the waiting trade-off method were comparable (P=0.51). Although tolerability scores were superior for sEGD (P<0.001) compared with uTNE, scores for uTNE examinations were acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient preference is comparable between sEGD and uTNE for diagnostic examinations conducted in an endoscopy suite or in a mobile setting. Given acceptable tolerability, uTNE may be a viable alternative to sEGD for BE screening.

Use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents is not related to epistaxis in patients undergoing transnasal endoscopy

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Unsedated transnasal endoscopy (uTNE) has become accepted as a safe and tolerable method for upper gastrointestinal tact examinations. Epistaxis is 1 of the major complications of TNE, though its risk factors have not been elucidated. Generally, patients administered an anticoagulant or antiplatelet drug are considered to have an increased risk of epistaxis during TNE. Here, we investigated risk factors of epistaxis in patients undergoing uTNE, with focus on those who received antithrombotic agents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 6860 patients (average age 55.6 ± 12.97 years; 3405 males, 3455 females) who underwent uTNE and received the same preparations for the procedure. Epistaxis was evaluated using endoscopic images obtained while withdrawing the scope through the nostril. We also noted current use of medications including anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents prior to the endoscopic examination.

RESULTS

Epistaxis occurred in 3.6 % of the enrolled patients (245/6860), and that rate was significantly higher in younger patients (average age 49.31 ± 11.8 years for epistaxis group vs. 55.83 ± 13.0 years for no epistaxis group, P  < 0.01) as well as females (4.78 % vs. 2.35 %, P  < 0.01). The odds ratio for occurrence of epistaxis was 2.31 (95 %CI: 1.746 - 3.167) in the younger patients and 2.02 (95 % CI: 1.542 - 2.659) in females. In contrast, there was no significant difference for rate of epistaxis between patients with and without treatment with an antithrombotic agent (3.0 % vs. 3.6 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of epistaxis was higher in younger and female patients. Importantly, that rate was not significantly increased in patients who were administered an antithrombotic agent.

Feasibility of transnasal endoscopy in screening for esophageal and gastric varices in patients with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 Screening for esophageal and gastric varices is indicated for patients with portal hypertension or cirrhosis. Typically, conventional endoscopy is used; however, the need for sedation increases the costs and risks, especially in cirrhotic patients. Use of transnasal endoscopy with an ultrathin endoscope enables study of the upper gastrointestinal tract without the need for sedation. The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of transnasal endoscopy in screening for esophageal and gastric varices in patients with chronic liver disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study in which transnasal endoscopy was carried out in patients with cirrhosis or portal hypertension who had indications for screening of esophageal and gastric varices. The following variables were evaluated: demographical data, duration of procedure, patient tolerance and acceptance, adverse events (AEs), endoscopic findings and interobserver agreement related to portal hypertension alterations ( kappa index).

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients entered the study. The most common cause of liver disease was chronic viral hepatitis (66 %). Among the cirrhotic patients, most of the patients were Child-Pugh A (74 %). In 5 patients (10 %), nasal intubation was not possible. Two patients (4 %) experienced minor epistaxis. Tolerance was excellent or good in 92 % according with a visual analogic scale. In 16 patients (32 %), esophageal varices were detected and in 2 patients (4 %) gastric varices were detected. The mean duration of the procedure was 7 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Transnasal endoscopy is feasible, effective and well tolerated for screening of esophageal and gastric varices in patients with chronic liver disease. It can be performed in outpatient clinics safely and without the use of sedation.

Application of bronchoscope for the placement of nasoenteric feeding tube in patients with esophagectomy: a novel technique

BACKGROUND

Currently the available techniques for the placement of nasoenteric feeding tube (NET), utilizing transnasal gastroscope are fast and tolerable, which is known as the most popular method. However, lots of hospitals don't have this endoscopic system. Bronchoscope, which is the basic respiratory endoscope, not only has the advantages of transnasal endoscopy, but also is popular in common hospitals. We used oxygen instillation as air supply plant of the bronchoscope, which broke its application limitation in digestive tract. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and availability of the method of placing NET with the bronchoscope in patients with esophagectomy.

METHODS

From January 2013 to January 2016, a total of 48 patients with esophagectomy who underwent NET placement with the bronchoscope were included in our study. Information concerning age, gender, as well as background disease of the patients was collected. The success rate, procedure duration, and complications were recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

The technique success rate reached 100%, procedure time ranged from 150 to 750 s, with an average time of 257 s. All patients tolerated well under local anesthesia, no complication of epistaxis or perforation occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The new technique of placing NET with the bronchoscope is fast, safe, effective, and well tolerated for patients with esophagectomy.

Transnasal endoscopy: no gagging no panic!

BACKGROUND

Transnasal endoscopy (TNE) is performed with an ultrathin scope via the nasal passages and is increasingly used. This review covers the technical characteristics, tolerability, safety and acceptability of TNE and also diagnostic accuracy, use as a screening tool and therapeutic applications. It includes practical advice from an ear, nose, throat (ENT) specialist to optimise TNE practice, identify ENT pathology and manage complications.

METHODS

A Medline search was performed using the terms "transnasal", "ultrathin", "small calibre", "endoscopy", "EGD" to identify relevant literature.

RESULTS

There is increasing evidence that TNE is better tolerated than standard endoscopy as measured using visual analogue scales, and the main area of discomfort is nasal during insertion of the TN endoscope, which seems remediable with adequate topical anaesthesia. The diagnostic yield has been found to be similar for detection of Barrett's oesophagus, gastric cancer and GORD-associated diseases. There are some potential issues regarding the accuracy of TNE in detecting small early gastric malignant lesions, especially those in the proximal stomach. TNE is feasible and safe in a primary care population and is ideal for screening for upper gastrointestinal pathology. It has an advantage as a diagnostic tool in the elderly and those with multiple comorbidities due to fewer adverse effects on the cardiovascular system. It has significant advantages for therapeutic procedures, especially negotiating upper oesophageal strictures and insertion of nasoenteric feeding tubes.

CONCLUSIONS

TNE is well tolerated and a valuable diagnostic tool. Further evidence is required to establish its accuracy for the diagnosis of early and small gastric malignancies. There is an emerging role for TNE in therapeutic endoscopy, which needs further study.

Current status of transnasal endoscopy worldwide using ultrathin videoscope for upper gastrointestinal tract

Transnasal endoscopy with an ultrathin endoscope has been reported to be highly acceptable even without any sedative measures. Poor image quality and complex manipulation have been reported as shortcomings of this type of endoscopy compared with standard transoral endoscopy. However, image quality has improved markedly with the latest ultrathin endoscopes. To investigate the status of clinical use of endoscopes, we recently conducted a questionnaire survey involving 149 facilities (98 in Japan and 51 overseas). In Japan, transnasal endoscopes were being used primarily in clinics (34% in clinics and 9% in hospitals). Overseas, however, transnasal endoscopes were seldom used (1% in hospitals and 0% in clinics). This may be attributable to the complex pretreatment and more challenging manipulation required for transnasal endoscopes. However, it is evident that transnasal endoscopes are highly acceptable for patients. If the pretreatment required is simplified and healthcare physicians improve their skills and understanding, this type of endoscopy will have high potential for common use.

Performance characteristics of unsedated ultrathin video endoscopy in the assessment of the upper GI tract: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Reports on the performance of unsedated ultrathin endoscopy via the transnasal (uTNE) and transoral (uTOE) routes are conflicting. We aimed to estimate the technical success rate, patient preference, and acceptability of uTNE and uTOE alone and in comparison with conventional EGD (cEGD; with or without sedation).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on all primary studies reporting the outcomes of interest. Electronic databases (Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE) were searched on February 1, 2014.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria with 6659 patients in total. The pooled technical success rate was 94.0% for uTNE (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.6-95.8; 30 studies) and 97.8% for uTOE (95% CI, 95.6-98.9; 16 studies). The difference in proportion of success for uTNE compared with cEGD was -2.0% (95% CI, -4.0 to -1.0; 18 studies), but that difference was not significant when uTNE < 5.9 mm in diameter was used (-1.0%; 95% CI, -3.0 to .0; 9 studies). There was no significant difference in success rate between uTOE and cEGD (.0%; 95% CI, -1.0 to 2.0; 10 studies). The pooled difference in proportion of patients who preferred uTNE over cEGD was 63.0% (95% CI, 49.0-76.0; 10 studies), whereas preference for uTOE versus cEGD was not significantly different (38.0%; 95% CI, -4.0 to 80.0; 2 studies). Acceptability was high for both uTNE (85.2%; 95% CI, 79.1-89.9; 16 studies) and uTOE (88.7%; 95% CI, 82.4-92.9; 10 studies).

CONCLUSIONS

Technical success rate for uTNE < 5.9 mm is equivalent to cEGD. uTNE has high patient acceptability, with better patient preference, and therefore could be a useful alternative to cEGD for screening purposes. uTOE had a similar technical success rate but an equivocal preference to cEGD.

Flavored anesthetic lozenge versus Xylocaine spray used as topical pharyngeal anesthesia for unsedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The use of Xylocaine spray has been the common practice in many endoscopy centers, but scientific evidence is not conclusive on its superiority over other forms of topical anesthesia. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Xylocaine spray as a topical pharyngeal anesthesia for upper endoscopy and that of anesthetic lozenges with a characteristic flavor.

METHODS

A randomized placebo-controlled trial was performed in a single endoscopy center. For this study, 191 consecutive patients ages 18 to 70 undergoing outpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopy were randomized before the procedure into either a spray group (10% Xylocaine pump spray plus plain Strepsils) or a lozenge group (Strepsils Dual Action anesthetic lozenge plus distilled water spray). The primary outcome was the patient tolerance score, calculated according to the taste of the anesthetic agent, the intensity of numbness, the amount of cough or gag, and the degree of discomfort at esophageal intubation. The secondary outcomes included difficulty of esophageal intubation and the patients' and endoscopists' satisfaction score for the procedure.

RESULTS

Randomization assigned 97 patients to the lozenge group and 94 patients to the spray group. The demographic data were similar in the two groups. The spray group had a significantly higher patient tolerance score, a greater intensity of numbness, less gag reflex, and less discomfort than the lozenge group. The lozenge group had a better taste than the spray group. The difficulty of esophageal intubation and the patients' and endoscopists' satisfaction were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical Xylocaine spray is superior to the flavored anesthetic lozenge as a topical pharyngeal anesthesia in unsedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Randomised clinical study: comparison of acceptability, patient tolerance, cardiac stress and endoscopic views in transnasal and transoral endoscopy under local anaesthetic

BACKGROUND

Transnasal endoscopy (TNE) with ultrathin endoscopes has been advocated as an attractive alternative, for diagnostic upper endoscopy.

AIM

To assess tolerability, acceptability and quality of TNE, in comparison with standard upper endoscopy (SOGD, standard oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy) under local anaesthetic.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 157 patients (83 females/74 males) mean age 57 years. The Fujinon EG530N (5.9 mm) and EG530WR (9.4 mm) endoscopes were used. The endoscopist and all patients completed detailed questionnaires regarding tolerability, acceptance and quality of endoscopy using standard visual analogue scales (VAS). Oxygen saturation (SaO2 ), heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were recorded. Quality of biopsies was evaluated.

RESULTS

Analysis included 161 procedures (TNE:79, SOGD:82) with duodenal intubation achieved in all patients. VAS scores for patient comfort were significantly better in the TNE group (7.3 vs. 5.3 respectively, P < 0.001). Twenty patients with previous experience of standard endoscopy were randomised to TNE and 19 of them (95.5%) preferred the TNE. Gagging was significantly less in the TNE group (0.12 vs. 3.41 respectively, P < 0.001). Cardiovascular stress was significantly less in the TNE group irrespective of the degree of gagging or comfort. TNE biopsies were smaller, but adequate for definitive diagnosis, similarly to standard endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Transnasal endoscopy is superior to SOGD in terms of comfort and patient acceptance with significantly less cardiovascular stress. TNE can routinely be used as alternative to SOGD under local anaesthetic, for diagnosis and should be preferentially offered in cardiorespiratory compromised patients.

Evaluation of preferable insertion routes for esophagogastroduodenoscopy using ultrathin endoscopes

AIM

To evaluate the discomfort associated with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) using an ultrathin endoscope through different insertion routes.

METHODS

This study (January 2012-March 2013) included 1971 consecutive patients [male/female (M/F), 1158/813, 57.5 ± 11.9 years] who visited a single institute for annual health checkups. Transnasal EGD was performed in 1394 patients and transoral EGD in 577. EGD-associated discomfort was assessed using a visual analog scale score (VAS score: 0-10).

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed gender (M vs F: 4.02 ± 2.15 vs 5.06 ± 2.43) as the only independent predictor of the VAS score in 180 patients who underwent EGD for the first time; whereas it revealed gender (M vs F 3.60 ± 2.20 vs 4.84 ± 2.37), operator, age group (A: < 39 years; B: 40-49 years; C: 50-59 years; D: 60-69 years; E: > 70 years; A/B/C/D/E: 4.99 ± 2.32/4.34 ± 2.49/4.19 ± 2.31/3.99 ± 2.27/3.63 ± 2.31), and type of insertion as independent predictors in the remaining patients. Subanalysis for gender, age group, and insertion route revealed that the VAS score decreased with age regardless of gender and insertion route, was high in female patients regardless of age and insertion route, and was low in males aged over 60 years who underwent transoral insertion.

CONCLUSION

Although comprehensive analysis revealed that the insertion route may not be an independent predictor of the VAS score, transoral insertion may reduce EGD-associated discomfort in elderly patients.

Catheter-free method is sufficient for preparation for transnasal endoscopy: randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although transnasal endoscopy (TNE) is generally a comfortable and safe procedure, it has some disadvantages, such as complicated preprocessing and occasional repulsion reaction during catheterization. In an attempt to simplify the preprocessing method, the efficacy of a catheter-free method in which a catheter is not inserted into the nasal cavity was assessed.

METHODS

The present study was a prospective, open-label, single-center, randomized controlled study with parallel assignment allocation 1:1. Between March 2009 and August 2009, a total of 93 TNE-naïve patients were enrolled and randomized. Patients were prospectively randomized into two groups (catheter-free vs catheter-insertion method). Patients who prepared according to the catheter-free method and who were unsuccessful underwent the catheter-insertion method. Clinical characteristics, success rate, complications, vital signs, acceptability, and tolerability were assessed and compared.

RESULTS

Success rates of the catheter-free and catheter-insertion methods were 88% (n=44) and 88% (n=38) (P>0.05), respectively. Causes of failure in the catheter-free method included severe rhinalgia (n=1, 2%) and narrowing of the nasal cavity (n=5, 10%). Causes of failure in the catheter-insertion method included narrowing of the nasal cavity (n=5, 11%). Six patients whose TNE failed with the catheter-free method also experienced failed TNE with the catheter-insertion method. There were no statistical differences in vital signs, acceptability, and tolerability.

CONCLUSION

The catheter-free method is sufficient for preparation for TNE. The success rate of TNE depends more on the structure of the nasal cavity than the preprocessing method.

Diagnostic utility of small-caliber and conventional endoscopes for gastric cancer and analysis of endoscopic false-negative gastric cancers

AIM: To analyze the diagnostic utility of a small-caliber endoscope (SC-E) and clinicopathological features of false-negative gastric cancers (FN-GCs).

METHODS: A total of 21638 esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) gastric cancer (GC) screening examinations were analyzed. Secondary endoscopic examinations (n = 3352) were excluded because most secondary examinations tended to be included in the conventional endoscopy (C-E) group. Detection rates of GCs and FN-GCs were compared between SC-E and C-E groups. FN-GC was defined as GC performed with EGD within the past 3 years without GC detection. Macroscopic types, histopathological characteristics and locations of FN-GCs were compared with firstly found-gastric cancers (FF-GCs) in detail.

RESULTS: SC-E cases (n = 6657) and C-E cases (n = 11644), a total of 18301 cases, were analyzed. GCs were detected in 16 (0.24%) SC-E cases and 40 C-E (0.34%) cases (P = 0.23) and there were 4 FN-GCs (0.06%) in SC-E and 13 (0.11%) in C-E (P = 0.27), with no significant difference. FN-GCs/GCs ratio between SC-E and C-E groups was not significantly different (P = 0.75). The comparison of endoscopic macroscopic types of FN-GCs tended to be a less advanced type (P = 0.02). Histopathologically, 70.6% of FN-GCs were differentiated and 29.4% undifferentiated type. On the other hand, 43.0% of FF-GCs were differentiated and 53.8% undifferentiated type, so FN-GCs tended to be more differentiated type (P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION: The diagnostic utility of SC-E for the detection of GCs and FN-GCs was not inferior to that of C-E. Careful observation for superficially depressed type lesions in the upper lesser curvature region is needed to decrease FN-GCs.

Utility and stability of transnasal endoscopy for examination of the pharynx - a prospective study and comparison with transoral endoscopy

OBJECTIVE

Transnasal endoscopy may be used to observe the head and neck part readily without excessive reflexes. We aimed to evaluate the utility and stability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (TN-EGD) in comparison with transoral EGD (TO-EGD) for observation of the pharynx.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study

METHODS

A total of 497 patients received unsedated TN-EGD with a 5.5 mm diameter endoscope or unsedated TO-EGD with endoscopes of 6.5 mm, 7.9 mm and 9.2 mm diameter. The rate of completion of pharyngeal observation and numbers of gag reflexes and cough reflexes were recorded.

RESULTS

TN-EGD was performed in 175 patients and TO-EGD was performed in 322 patients. Pharyngeal observation was completed in 173 patients (98.9%) in the TN-EGD group and 235 patients (73.2%) in the TO-EGD group, a significant difference (p<0.001). The TN-EGD group had a low rate of occurrence of gag reflex (0.57%), in contrast, 28.3% of the TO-EGD group had a gag reflex, a significant difference (p<0.01). Multivariable analyses revealed that the use of TN-EGD was the only predictive factor for completion of pharyngeal observation (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

TN-EGD is ideally suited to observation of the pharynx by unsedated EGD.

Utility of unsedated transnasal endoscopy for pharyngeal observation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. A prospective study to assess cardiopulmonary function

OBJECTIVES

Emergence of image-enhanced endoscopy has enabled an early detection of pharyngeal carcinoma. Pharyngeal observation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is sometimes difficult because of excessive reflexes and is a great burden to the patients and impacts on their cardiopulmonary function. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the utility of transnasal EGD (TN-EGD) in comparison with sedated and unsedated transoral EGD (TO-EGD) in pharyngeal observation using a continuous monitoring device.

METHODS

A total of 70 patients receiving diagnostic EGD (unsedated TN-EGD, sedated TO-EGD, and unsedated TO-EGD) were enrolled in this study and were evaluated by the following three criteria: (1) numbers of patients with excessive gag and/or cough reflex, (2) vital signs before and during the pharyngeal observation, and (3) response to the request for vocalization or breath-holding.

RESULTS

Unsedated TN-EGD, sedated TO-EGD, and unsedated TO-EGD were performed in 30, 20, and 20 patients, respectively. The rate of gag reflex was significantly lower in TN-EGD than in both types of TO-EGD (0% vs. 30%, chi-square test, p < 0.005). The changes in average values of both arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate (PR) in TN-EGD were smaller than those in sedated TO-EGD (-0.23% vs. -1.23% in SpO2 and 1.57 vs. 8.11 bpm in PR, p < 0.01, respectively). Unsedated TN-EGD patients could respond to the instructions of utterance and breath-holding during the observation (p < 0.05, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Unsedated TN-EGD is safe and feasible for pharyngeal observation during normal EGD examination.

Effectiveness of unsedated transnasal endoscopy with white-light, flexible spectral imaging color enhancement, and lugol staining for esophageal cancer screening in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Transnasal endoscopy (TNE) has been proposed to screen for esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) in Asia. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and tolerance of Brazilian patients to undergo unsedated TNE for screening, the prevalence of ESCC in this population, and the effectiveness of white-light endoscopy (WLE) and digital chromoendoscopy [flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE)] to diagnose esophageal neoplasia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a diagnostic test study that enrolled patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) referred to ESCC screening. Patients' tolerance was rated by a numeric pain intensity scale. Interventions included unsedated TNE with WLE and FICE examination of the esophagus, in a tandem manner with blinded operators, followed by lugol chromoscopy. Performance of WLE and FICE for neoplasia detection was compared with the reference standard (lugol chromoscopy plus histology).

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were recruited. TNE was feasible in 99.1%, and 92% of the patients rated the discomfort as absent or minimal. Thirteen ESCC were detected (12.3%), with 10 early cancers (77%). The tests showed an excellent performance and there was no difference between WLE (sensitivity 92.3%, specificity 98.9%, accuracy 98.1%, area under curve 0.995) and FICE (sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.9%, accuracy 99%, area under curve 0.956) for esophageal neoplasia detection.

CONCLUSIONS

Unsedated TNE is a feasible, well accepted, and efficient diagnostic tool for the screening of ESCC. The elevated rate of esophageal neoplasia strengthens the recommendations to screen patients with HNSCC. The yields of WLE and FICE were similar for ESCC detection.

Direct biliary drainage using transnasal endoscopy for patients with severe-to-moderate acute cholangitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic biliary drainage (BD) is an effective palliative treatment for acute cholangitis. Transnasal endoscopy (TNE) using an ultraslim endoscope can be less stressful and has limited hemodynamic effects compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography using a conventional duodenoscope. Here, we evaluate the clinical usefulness of direct BD by TNE in critically ill patients with acute cholangitis who had undergone endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) previously.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with severe-to-moderate acute cholangitis who had undergone ES previously were enrolled prospectively. BD was achieved by TNE, using an ultraslim upper endoscope with a 5-Fr nasobiliary drainage catheter and/or a plastic stent. The technical and clinical success, as well as the safety, of the procedure were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were enrolled, including 17 with bile duct stones. The severity of the cholangitis was severe in nine (39.1%) and moderate in 14 patients (60.9%). The technical success rate was 95.7% (22/23). Nasobiliary drainage was performed in 15 patients, a plastic stent was placed in three, and both treatments were used in four patients. In three patients, direct BD by TNE was achieved in the intensive care unit without fluoroscopy. Direct cholangioscopy for distal common bile duct was performed in nine patients (40.9%), and three patients underwent immediate stone extraction under endoscopic visualization. Clinical improvement was achieved in 20/23 (87.0%) of patients. No significant procedure-related complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Direct BD by TNE may be useful in critically ill patients with severe-to-moderate acute cholangitis who had undergone ES previously.

Unsedated transnasal percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy carried out by a single physician

AIM

The present prospective observational study investigates the safety of transnasal percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (T-PEG) carried out by a single physician using an ultrathin endoscope.

METHODS

A single endoscopist attempted the unsedated transnasal insertion of a 20-Fr PEG tube using a pull-method in 31 dysphagic patients: 11 females and 20 males aged 76.5±10.6(46-96)years, using a 5-mm-diameter endoscope. The indications for PEG, cardiopulmonary function before and after T-PEG, operation time, success or failure, and any immediate adverse events that occurred during each procedure were recorded. Complications, including peristomal infection, systemic infection, tube lifespan, and patient mortality were monitored throughout the post-T-PEG follow-up period.

RESULTS

Thirty (96.8%) of the transnasal PEG insertions were successful. The mean operation time was 14.7±2.9 (10-20) min, and cardiopulmonary function did not change before and after T-PEG. Complications included three (10%) cases of epistaxis, eight (26.6%) cases of minor Pseudomonas wound infection and two cases of Foley-related urinary tract infection (UTI). No self-extubation was observed, and the mean lifespan of the PEG tubes was 10.7±2.2months. Four patients died from pneumonia 10months after T-PEG insertion.

CONCLUSION

Unsedated T-PEG insertion carried out by a single physician is a feasible and safe procedure. No major complications or mortality were observed following the procedures; only minor Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound infections were noted. It is an alternative method for dysphagic patients when transoral insertion of endoscopy is impossible.

Topical anesthesia for transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: spray, applicator, or both?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) has become widely accepted in Japan. Better performance and compliance for the procedure are expected with appropriate nasal anesthesia.We aimed to elucidate the effectiveness, the safety and the compliance of nasal anesthesia for transnasal EGD.

METHODS

Subjects were 372 asymptomatic patients examined by transnasal EGD for gastric cancer screening. They were pretreated with topical anesthesia either with a nasal spray method (Spr group, n = 127), cotton-tipped applicator method (Cot group, n = 115), or both (Com group, n = 130). Lidocaine (4%) was applied with atomizer in the Spr method, whereas a cotton-tipped applicator soaked in 4% lidocaine was placed in the nasal cavity for 5 min in the Cot method. After transnasal EGD, each subject rated procedure-related discomfort according to visual analogue scales. In subjects who had prior experience of transoral EGD, tolerance against EGD was compared between transnasal and transoral routes.

RESULTS

There were no severe adverse events related to topical anesthesia.Transnasal EGD was completed in 94.9% of the patients.Age, gender or insertion failure rate were not different among Spr, Cot and Com groups. Pain scores for anesthesia and examination were significantly lower in the Spr group, whereas the pain score for insertion was not different among the three groups.The rate of patients who deemed transnasal EGD to be more tolerable than transoral EGD was highest in the Spr group.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical nasal spray seems to be appropriate for topical anesthesia in transnasal EGD.

Recent development of gastric cancer prevention

A mass screening program using photofluorography has been used as a secondary prophylaxis of gastric cancer in Japan. However, we are at a turning point for reconsidering the strategy of gastric cancer prevention because of various problems with photofluorography. The shift from current secondary prophylaxis to primary prophylaxis is now required. After a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial showed that Helicobacter pylori eradication reduced the incidence of metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer, primary prophylaxis of gastric cancer has gained greater attention. The combination of H. pylori eradication as a primary prophylaxis and screening as a secondary prophylaxis is necessary for the elimination of gastric cancer in Japan. The strategy of test, treat and screening for H. pylori infection is effective in reducing the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in communities with a high incidence of gastric cancer. We have proposed a program of risk stratification based on the presence of H. pylori infection with or without atrophic gastritis followed by targeted interventions.

A prospective randomized study comparing transnasal and peroral 5-mm ultrathin endoscopy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Differences in patient tolerance, acceptance, and satisfaction of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) between transnasal (TN) and peroral (PO) routes using a 5-mm video endoscope.

METHODS

A total of 220 enrolled patients were assigned randomly to two groups undergoing EGD-110 patients each for TN and PO. The successful rate, procedure time, and adverse events were recorded. After the procedure, patients answered a validated questionnaire of tolerance, acceptance, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

There were 6 failures (5.7%) of nasal intubation and two nasal bleeding (2%) among 105 TN-EGD procedures. All PO patients (n=102) completed EGD successfully without adverse event. Compared to PO, the procedure of TN achieved lower successful rate (94% vs. 100%, p=0.01), was complicated with epistaxis (2% vs. 0%) and took longer (mean ± SD 19.9 ± 6.1 min vs. 16.8 ± 6.4 min, p=0.0001). The patients undergoing TN-EGD indicated less discomfort during passing pharynx (scores of 2.1 ± 2.0 vs. 3.1 ± 2.6, p=0.011) but more pain during inserting scope (scores of 2.2 ± 1.6 vs. 1.5 ± 1.8, p=0.0001). Eventually, there were no significant differences between TN and PO regarding the overall procedure discomfort (scores of 10.7 ± 6.6 vs. 11.1 ± 7.8 scores, p=0.9), satisfaction (scores of 41.2 ± 4.2 vs. 41.3 ± 4.6, p=0.91), and acceptability (87.8% vs. 94.2%, p=0.91).

CONCLUSION

PO intubation seems an excellent alternative method when using a 5-mm ultrathin endoscopy because it achieves comparable patient tolerance, acceptance, and satisfaction as TN intubation, takes less time and causes lower intubation failure and epistaxis.

Transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for placement of nasoenteric feeding tubes in patients with severe upper gastrointestinal diseases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of small-caliber transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for the placement of nasoenteric feeding tubes (NET) in patients with severe upper gastrointestinal (GI) diseases.

METHODS

Between January 2007 and March 2010, 51 patients underwent transnasal endoscopy for the placement of NET in Peking University Third Hospital. Indications for NET included esophageal stricture or gastric outlet obstruction because of corrosive esophagitis or gastritis, partial obstruction due to malignancy, stenosis in stoma or efferent loop, gastroparesis, metallic stent in upper GI tract, tracheoesophageal fistula, severe acute pancreatitis, anorexia nervosa and intensive care patients. The tubes were endoscopically placed using the guidewire technique. The position of the tube was confirmed by the immediate second endoscopy or abdominal X-ray. If the initiate placement was not correct, an adjustment or a second placement was conducted immediately.

RESULTS

Initial post-pyloric placement of NET was achieved in 43 of 51 patients (84.3%), but the total success rate reached 98.0% (50/51) after the second placement. The time required for the procedure ranged from 10 to 35 min, with a median time of 20.4 min. Epistaxis occurred in 2 patients. There were no complications of hemorrhage, perforation or aspiration.

CONCLUSION

The transnasal endoscopic placement of NET was feasible in patients with upper GI diseases, especially in those with changed anatomy.

Feasibility, safety, acceptability, and yield of office-based, screening transnasal esophagoscopy (with video)

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic screening for esophageal neoplasia can identify patients eligible for early intervention for precancerous lesions. Unsedated transnasal esophagoscopy may provide an efficient and accurate endoscopic assessment with fewer risks and less cost, compared with conventional upper endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility, safety, acceptability, and yield of unsedated transnasal esophagoscopy in a primary care population.

DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Two outpatient tertiary-care centers.

PATIENTS

This study involved a general medical clinic population aged between 40 and 85 years.

INTERVENTION

Unsedated, office-based transnasal esophagoscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Procedure yield; completeness of examination; procedure length; adverse events and complications; choking, gagging, pain, or anxiety during the examination; and overall tolerability.

RESULTS

A total of 426 participants (mean [± standard deviation] age 55.8 ± 9.5 years; 43% male) enrolled in the study, and 422 (99%) completed the examination. Mean (± standard deviation) examination time was 3.7 ± 1.8 minutes. There were no serious adverse events, and 12 participants (2.8%) reported minor complications. Participants reported minimal choking, gagging, pain, or anxiety. The examination was well-tolerated by most participants. Overall, 38% of participants had an esophageal finding that changed management (34% erosive esophagitis, 4% Barrett's esophagus).

LIMITATIONS

Nonrandomized study, tertiary-care centers only, self-selected population with a large proportion reporting esophageal symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Unsedated transnasal esophagoscopy is a feasible, safe, and well-tolerated method to screen for esophageal disease in a primary care population. Endoscopic findings are common in this patient population.

Transnasal and standard transoral endoscopies in the screening of gastric mucosal neoplasias

AIM: To compare the diagnostic performances of transnasal and standard transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in gastric cancer screening of asymptomatic healthy subjects.

METHODS: Between January 2006 and March 2010, a total of 3324 subjects underwent examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract by EGD for cancer screening, with 1382 subjects (41.6%) screened by transnasal EGD and the remaining 1942 subjects (58.4%) by standard transoral EGD. Clinical profiles of the screened subjects, detection rates of gastric neoplasia and histopathology of the detected neoplasias were compared between groups according to the stage of Helicobacter pylori

(H. pylori)-related chronic gastritis.

RESULTS: Clinical profiles of subjects did not differ significantly between the two EGD groups, except that there were significantly more men in the transnasal EGD group. During the study period, 55 cases of gastric mucosal neoplasias were detected. Of these, 23 cases were detected by transnasal EGD and 32 cases by standard transoral EGD. The detection rate for gastric mucosal neoplasia in the transnasal EGD group was thus 1.66%, compared to 1.65% in the standard transoral EGD group, with no significant difference between the two groups. Detection rates using the two endoscopies were likewise comparable, regardless of H. pylori infection. However, detection rates when screening subjects without extensive chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) were significantly higher with standard transoral EGD (0.70%) than with transnasal EGD (0.12%, P < 0.05). In particular, standard transoral EGD was far better for detecting neoplasia in subjects with H. pylori-related non-atrophic gastritis, with a detection rate of 3.11% compared to 0.53% using transnasal EGD (P < 0.05). In the screening of subjects with extensive CAG, no significant differences in detection of neoplasia were evident between the two endoscopies, although the mean size of detected cancers was significantly smaller and the percentage of early cancers was significantly higher with standard transoral EGD.

CONCLUSION: These results strongly suggest that the diagnostic performance of transnasal endoscopy is suboptimal for cancer screening, particularly in subjects with H. pylori-related non-atrophic gastritis.

Cardiovascular tolerance and autonomic nervous responses in unsedated upper gastrointestinal small-caliber endoscopy: a comparison between transnasal and peroral procedures with newly developed mouthpiece

BACKGROUND

Transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with small-caliber endoscopy appears to be less stressful to the cardiovascular system and has good patient tolerance. ENDO LEADER, a newly developed mouthpiece for peroral EGD with small-caliber endoscopy, is expected to reduce patient stress. We compared the patient acceptance, cardiovascular tolerance and autonomic nervous responses between transnasal EGD and peroral EGD with ENDO LEADER.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 130 patients (transnasal group, 77; peroral group, 53) were enrolled. Pulse rate (P), blood pressure (BP), and peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO(2) ) were monitored. Acceptance of EGD was also assessed. Autonomic nervous responses were evaluated through analysis of heart rate variability using amplitude of the high-frequency component (HF) and low-frequency-to-high-frequency power ratio (LF/HF) as indices of cardiac vagal activity and sympathetic activity, respectively.

RESULTS

Analysis of patient acceptance showed no differences between the two groups, except with regard to nasal pain. Increases in BP and P between before and during EGD examination were significantly higher in the peroral group. Although throat pain and overall tolerance scores were significantly correlated with ΔBP and ΔP, no correlations with nasal pain score were noted. Heart rate variability analysis revealed that heart rate increased significantly in the peroral group, but there were no differences in ΔHF or ΔLF/HF between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient acceptance was not significantly different between the transnasal and peroral with ENDO LEADER groups; however, transnasal EGD appears to be less stressful to the sympathetic nervous system, leading to smaller elevations in BP, P and heart rate.

A randomized trial of topical anesthesia comparing lidocaine versus lidocaine plus xylometazoline for unsedated transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

BACKGROUND

The optimal topical anesthesia regimen for unsedated transnasal endoscopy is unknown. The addition of a nasal decongestant, such as xylometazoline (X), to a topical anesthestic may improve patient comfort.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of lidocaine (L) versus L plus X (LX) for anesthesia in unsedated transnasal endoscopy.

METHODS

Consecutive participants of the Aklavik Helicobacter pylori project were prospectively randomly assigned to receive LX or L for unsedated transnasal 4.9 mm ultrathin endoscopy. The primary outcome was overall procedure discomfort on a validated 10-point visual analogue scale (1 = no discomfort, 10 = severe discomfort). Secondary outcomes included pain, endoscope insertion difficulty, gagging, adverse events and encounter times. Results were presented as mean +/- SD, difference in mean, 95% CI.

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients were randomly assigned to receive LX (n=94) and L (n=87). Baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar (mean age 40 years, 59% women). Overall, patient procedural discomfort with LX and L were 4.2+/-2.4 versus 3.9+/-2.1, respectively (0.29; 95% CI -0.39 to 0.96). Transnasal insertion difficulty was significantly lower with LX than with L (2.4+/-2.1 versus 3.2+/-2.8, respectively [-0.80; 95% CI -1.54 to -0.06]). Compared with L, the use of LX was associated with significantly less time needed to apply anesthesia (2.4+/-1.8 min versus 3.5+/-2.2 min, respectively [-1.10; 95% CI -1.71 min to -0.50 min]) and less time for insertion (3.2+/-1.8 min versus 3.9+/-2.2 min, respectively [-0.70 min; 95% CI -1.30 min to -0.10 min]). Epistaxis was rare but occurred less frequently with LX (1.1%) than with L (4.6%) (P=0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

LX did not improve patient comfort for transnasal endoscopy compared with L alone. However, LX was associated with less difficulty with endoscope transnasal insertion and reduced insertion time. Further studies on the optimal regimen and dosing of anesthesia are required.

Role of ultrathin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: experience with 50 patients

Conventional gastroscopes have a diameter of 8.8-12 mm; ultrathin endoscopes have an outer diameter of 5.3-5.9 mm. We share our experience with 50 patients who underwent transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy using an ultrathin endoscope. The indications included endoscopyassisted nasogastric tube placement in 25 patients, tight lesions not negotiable with conventional endoscope in 9, restricted mouth opening in 9, corrosive injury in 3, restricted cervical spine movement in 2 and altered sensorium following cerebrovascular accident in 2 patients. Transnasal esophageal intubation failed in 1 patient each with oropharyngeal malignancy and lipoma annularis coli. Wire-guided naso-jejunal tube placement was done in 2 patients and transnasal percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was done in 1 patient. Two patients developed self-limiting epistaxis. Ultrathin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscope is a useful tool in endoscopy units, particularly those dealing with oncology patients. Inability to deliver endotherapy due to small diameter of the working channel is a limitation.

Does a small biopsied gastric specimen limit the usage of two directional transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

It is difficult to approach certain gastric regions due to the limited bending ability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (TN-EGD). We analyzed the TN-EGD biopsied specimens according to where they were obtained inside the stomach.

METHODS

Two hundred and eighty-nine gastric biopsy specimens were obtained during diagnostic TN-EGD. The gastric biopsied specimens were quantified according to their diameter and depth in micrometers, and depth in layers (superficial mucosa, deep mucosa, muscularis mucosa and submucosa). The quality was measured by the degrees of anatomical orientation (good, intermediate and poor), presence of crush artifact (none to minimal, mild and moderate) and overall diagnostic adequacy (adequate, suboptimal and inadequate).

RESULTS

Poor orientation, presence of crush and overall diagnostic inadequacy were present in 33 (11.4%), 26 (9.0%) and 37 (12.8%) of the 289 specimens, respectively. Deep mucosa was present in 211 specimens (73.0%), while muscularis mucosa was present in only 75 specimens (26.0%). Specimens taken from the posterior aspect of the cardia exhibited the shallowest depth (P = 0.011), poorest orientation (P < 0.001) and poorest diagnostic adequacy (P < 0.001). Fluoroscopic findings demonstrated that the posterior aspect of the cardia was difficult to approach closely and perpendicularly because of the anatomical configuration of the stomach in nature.

CONCLUSION

TN-EGD biopsied specimens obtained from the posterior aspect of the cardia exhibit limitations in both quality and quantity. When performing a biopsy using two directional TN-EGD, special attention should be paid to gastric lesions located on the posterior aspect of the cardia.

Biopsy specimens obtained with small-caliber endoscopes have comparable diagnostic performances than those obtained with conventional endoscopes: a prospective study on 1335 specimens

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) can be routinely performed via a nasal route in adults by using small-caliber endoscopes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of biopsy specimens obtained with small forceps for histologic diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January to April 2007, we prospectively compared all biopsy specimens obtained, during conventional EGD (8.8-mm-diameter endoscope), with (CS-EGD) or without sedation (C-EGD), and transnasal or transoral-EGD (4.9-mm-diameter endoscope) without sedation (T-EGD). All biopsy specimens were blindly evaluated by a pathologist. For each specimen, were recorded: site, biopsy size and thickness, type of lesion (focal or diffuse), and in case of focal abnormalities described by the endoscopist, presence of the histologic lesions in the targeted biopsies.

RESULTS

One thousand and thirty-five biopsy specimens were obtained from 300 procedures (109 T-EGD, 48 C-EGD, and 143 CS-EGD): 983 biopsy specimens were untargeted (esophagus and cardia in 21%, stomach in 85% and duodenum in 84%) and 352 biopsy specimens were targeted to focal lesions (esophagus and cardia in 79%, stomach in 15%, and duodenum in 16%). The mean size of specimens was 1.8, 2, 2.2 mm diameter, in T-EGD, C-EGD, and CS-EGD groups, respectively (P<0.001). The whole thickness of mucosa was present in 68%, 84%, 71% of the cases among T-EGD, C-EGD, and CS-EGD groups, respectively (P=0.9). There was no significant difference in the rate of definitive histologic diagnosis from targeted or nontargeted biopsies according to the endoscopic procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Biopsy specimens obtained during EGD with small forceps are as effective for diagnosis as those obtained with standard forceps.

Gauze pledgetting versus endoscopic-guided aerosolized spray for nasal anesthesia before transnasal EGD: a prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND

Methods and efficacy of nasal anesthesia before ultrathin transnasal EGD (UT-EGD) are crucial for patient tolerance.

OBJECTIVE

To compare patient tolerance, safety, and adverse events between cotton-tipped applicator primed gauze pledgetting (CTGP) and endoscopic-guided aerosolized spray (EGAS) methods of nasal anesthesia.

DESIGN

We performed a prospective, randomized-controlled trial to compare procedural discomforts, optical quality, total procedure time, and adverse events between the CTGP and EGAS methods.

SETTING

A large, tertiary referral hospital in Taiwan.

PATIENTS

A total of 240 consecutive patients with epigastric discomfort were included in the study.

INTERVENTION

The author performed all standardized nasal anesthesia and UT-EGD using a 5.9-mm diameter transnasal endoscope.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Technical success, patient tolerability profiles, optical quality, total procedure time, and adverse events.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in insertion failure rates between the 2 methods (CTGP 0% vs EGAS 5%, P = .07). When compared with the EGAS method, CTGP reduced pain during insertions through the inferior nasal meatus (3.4 +/- 0.5 vs 3.2 +/- 0.4, P = .006), middle nasal meatus (4.0 +/- 0.7 vs 3.4 +/- 0.5, P = .002), and upper esophageal sphincter (2.9 +/- 0.7 vs 2.6 +/- 0.8, P = .005). CTGP elicited less unpleasant taste, fewer gagging episodes, and less throat pain after examination. Both methods had similar safe hemodynamic profiles, low epistaxis rates (0% vs 2%, P = .46), and comparable visual capacity and procedure time. Although similar proportions of patients in both groups would like to receive the same procedure the next time, CTGP had a higher overall tolerance.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the EGAS method, CTGP achieved a better tolerability profile and elicited less bad taste, fewer gagging episodes, and less throat pain after UT-EGD in Taiwanese patients.

Unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy in elderly and bedridden patients

AIM

To evaluate the safety of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for elderly and critically ill bedridden patients.

METHODS

One prospective randomized comparative study and one crossover comparative study between transnasal small-caliber EGD and transoral conventional EGD was done (Study 1). For the comparative study, we enrolled 240 elderly patients aged > 65 years old. For the crossover analysis, we enrolled 30 bedridden patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) (Study 2). We evaluated cardiopulmonary effects by measuring arterial oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) and calculating the rate-pressure product (RPP) (pulse rate x systolic blood pressure/100) at baseline, 2 and 5 min after endoscopic intubation in Study 1. To assess the risk for endoscopy-related aspiration pneumonia during EGD, we also measured blood leukocyte counts and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels before and 3 d after EGD in Study 2.

RESULTS

In Study 1, we observed significant decreases in SpO(2) during conventional transoral EGD, but not during transnasal small-caliber EGD (0.24% vs -0.24% after 2 min, and 0.18% vs -0.29% after 5 min, P = 0.034, P = 0.044). Significant differences of the RPP were not found between conventional transoral and transnasal small-caliber EGD. In Study 2, crossover analysis showed statistically significant increases of the RPP at 2 min after intubation and the end of endoscopy (26.8 and 34.6 vs 3.1 and 15.2, P = 0.044, P = 0.046), and decreases of SpO(2) (-0.8% vs -0.1%, P = 0.042) during EGD with transoral conventional in comparison with transnasal small-caliber endoscopy. Thus, for bedridden patients with PEG feeding, who were examined in the supine position, transoral conventional EGD more severely suppressed cardiopulmonary function than transnasal small-caliber EGD. There were also significant increases in the markers of inflammation, blood leukocyte counts and serum CRP values, in bedridden patients after transoral conventional EGD, but not after transnasal small-caliber EGD performed with the patient in the supine position. Leukocyte count increased from 6053 +/- 1975/L to 6900 +/- 3392/L (P = 0.0008) and CRP values increased from 0.93 +/- 0.24 to 2.49 +/- 0.91 mg/dL (P = 0.0005) at 3 d after transoral conventional EGD. Aspiration pneumonia, possibly caused by the endoscopic examination, was found subsequently in two of 30 patients after transoral conventional EGD.

CONCLUSION

Transnasal small-caliber EGD is a safer method than transoral conventional EGD in critically ill, bedridden patients who are undergoing PEG feeding.

Transnasal transesophageal echocardiography in the detection of left atrial thrombus

BACKGROUND

The widespread use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is limited by disadvantages, including patient intolerance and increased medical costs. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of transnasal TEE in the detection of possible embolic sources in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or stroke, using an ultrathin TEE probe.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with AF and/or stroke underwent transnasal TEE without conscious sedation. The presence or the absence of the following parameters was evaluated: left atrial (LA) thrombus; LA spontaneous echocardiographic contrast; intraatrial shunts; and aortic plaque.

RESULTS

The insertion of a TEE probe was successful in 52 (84%) patients. TEE found LA thrombus in 10 (19%) patients and other embolic sources in 4 (8%) patients. Two (4%) patients had mild epistaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the use of transnasal TEE was feasible and safe in the detection of LA thrombus in patients with AF and/or stroke.

Current status and evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy

We reviewed the current status of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with regard to tolerance, safety, feasibility and accuracy. Comparison of standard and ultrathin scopes and recently reported endoscopic techniques with transnasal insertion are also described as well as the current status of transnasal EGD in European countries compared with Japan. As several studies concluded that transnasal EGD can facilitate comfortable endoscopy without the need for sedative drugs, it has been tried in countries in which a relatively high number of unsedated EGD are carried out in daily practice. Long-tube intubation of the jejunum with the assistance of transnasal EGD will also be a part of the daily practice in the near future. However, its safety and accuracy should be further investigated. Even a standard scope whose charge-coupled device (CCD) has the same resolution as an ultrathin scope is superior to an ultrathin scope in terms of luminosity and resolution. Given the small number of procedures reported to date, the absolute complication rate of unsedated transnasal EGD is unknown. Methods of nasal anesthesia, as well as informed consent, indications and contraindications for transnasal EGD are not standardized. A guideline of transnasal EGD is under discussion by the Japanese Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

Comparison of the diagnostic utility of the ultrathin endoscope and the conventional endoscope in early gastric cancer screening

Currently, transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy using an ultrathin endoscope is being widely carried out as a screening test for early gastric cancer. We compared the diagnostic utility of ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscopy with that of conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy in detecting 42 lesions of early gastric cancer that had a diameter of <or=20 mm. Only 27 lesions (64%) could be accurately diagnosed using ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscopy. In nine lesions (22%), we failed to discern whether they were malignant. Six lesions (14%) could not even be detected. We found that the diagnostic utility of ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscopy was inadequate, especially in the case of lesions that were located in the upper third region of the stomach and variegated lesions. In conclusion, the diagnostic utility of ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscopy might be lower than that of conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy in terms of screening for early gastric cancer. The disadvantages of ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscopy should be taken carefully into consideration while examining lesions.

Early experience with unsedated ultrathin 4.9 mm transnasal gastroscopy: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Unsedated transnasal gastroscopy is a technique with unverified clinical advantages.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and procedure times with transnasal gastroscopy by physicians with no previous experience in transnasal endoscopy.

METHODS

Unsedated transnasal gastroscopy using 4.9 mm ultrathin transnasal gastroscopes with randomization to two different biopsy forceps was prospectively evaluated during a single day in January 2008. The outcomes included patient tolerance (scale: 1, no discomfort; 10, severe discomfort), physician technical assessment (1, excellent; 10, very poor), gastric biopsy quality, adverse events and procedure times.

RESULTS

Twenty patients underwent transnasal gastroscopy. Nineteen patients (95%) successfully completed transnasal gastroscopy. The patient-reported mean (+/- SD) overall discomfort level during the procedure was 4.0+/-1.9 compared with a physician-estimated level of 3.2+/-1.7 (P=0.04). Only 10% (n=2) reported they would have preferred sedated over unsedated gastroscopy. Mean total encounter time from anesthesia to discharge was 33.5+/-9.3 min. The time from anesthesia to insertion was 7.0+/-5.3 min and from room exit to discharge 6.2+/-2.9 min. No patients who had gastric biopsies taken (zero of 14) had any of unacceptable quality. The only adverse event was distressing sensations (dyspnea, dizziness) in one patient that started during pre-endoscopy anesthetic application, persisting postendoscopy, but without any abnormalities in vital signs.

CONCLUSION

Assuming the adverse event was a rare reaction, early experience with unsedated ultrathin transnasal gastroscopy was an efficient, effective and well-tolerated procedure for evaluation of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Transnasal route: new approach to endoscopy

Transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (TN-EGD) has recently become one of the frequently used methods of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in some countries. Changes in blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation are smaller for TN-EGD than for conventional transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy, making it a safer procedure. Lower pain and gag reflex enable TN-EGD to be performed without conscious sedation. TN-EGD is applied in various gastrointestinal (GI) procedures such as percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, nasoenteric feeding tube placement, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography with nasobiliary drainage and lithotripsy, long intestinal tube placement in small-bowel obstruction, esophageal manometry, foreign body removal, botulinum toxin injection for achalasia, esophageal varix evaluation with the aid of endoscopic ultrasonography, and the double-scope technique for endoscopic submucosal dissection. The establishment of standard training programs and nationwide guidelines, the dissemination of educational information, the improvement in endoscopy devices and accessories, and the availability of insurance coverage for the procedure will obviously further widen the adoption of TN-EGD.

Real-time evaluation of dyspeptic symptoms and gastric motility induced by duodenal acidification using noninvasive transnasal endoscopy

BACKGROUND

Although different pathophysiological mechanisms have been suggested to be involved in functional dyspepsia, a practical method to clarify them has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate dyspeptic symptoms and gastric motility induced by duodenal acidification using transnasal endoscopy.

METHODS

Fourteen healthy volunteers (mean age, 32 years) were enrolled. Transnasal endoscopy was performed on all fasting volunteers. Dyspeptic symptoms and antral contractions were evaluated before and after duodenal infusions of pure water (20 ml/min for 5 min) and acid (0.1 N HCl, 20 ml/min for 5 min). The severity of various symptoms was assessed by each subject using a 10-cm visual analog scale every 2 min. The maximum severity scale was calculated as the mean of the individual maximum values. The motility number was defined as the mean number of antral contractions in 1 min.

RESULTS

The maximum severity score for a heavy feeling in the stomach and other symptoms significantly increased after the acid infusion compared with after the pure water infusion. During pure water infusion, there were no changes in the motility number. On the other hand, the motility number significantly decreased after duodenal acidification (before vs. after, 2.93 +/- 0.12 times vs. 1.11 +/- 0.23 times, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Duodenal acid exposure induces dyspeptic symptoms and inhibits antral motility. Transnasal endoscopy enabled us to evaluate both dyspeptic symptoms and gastric motility simultaneously.