Clinical impact of liquid-based cytology test on diagnostic yields from transbronchial needle aspiration

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis: A 9-year experience at a single center

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is valuable for diagnosing pulmonary sarcoidosis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA and cytology in sarcoidosis during the first 9 years at our institution.

METHODS

Patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for suspected sarcoidosis between January 2011 and November 2019 were identified retrospectively. EBUS-TBNA was performed with rapid on-site cytological evaluation of the samples. The final diagnosis was based on the pathology and/or cytology results, radiologic features, and clinical follow-up findings. The yield rate was analyzed annually.

RESULTS

Eighty patients underwent 83 EBUS-TBNA procedures for suspected sarcoidosis. In total, 136 lymph nodes were sampled. The mean number of lymph node stations sampled was 2.0 ± 0.6; the mean number of needle passes per lymph node was 3.5 ± 0.8. Sixty-five patients were diagnosed with sarcoidosis, with a total of 68 procedures. Nonnecrotizing granulomatous inflammation was detected in the EBUS-TBNA samples from 49/68 procedures (yield rate: 72.1%). Of 19 patients with sarcoidosis who did not obtain a pathological diagnosis with EBUS-TBNA, epithelioid cells and/or multinuclear giant cells suggestive of granulomatous inflammation were detected in five. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) for pathological diagnosis of sarcoidosis using EBUS-TBNA were 72.1%, 100%, 100%, and 24.0%, respectively. On using cytology, the sensitivity and NPV increased to 79.4% and 26.3%, respectively. The yield rate did not increase until 2016.

CONCLUSION

EBUS-TBNA is useful for diagnosing sarcoidosis. Cytology resulted in an additional yield rate of 7.3%, which improved as the number of cases increased.

Liquid-based rapid onsite evaluation of endobronchial ultrasound cytologies

INTRODUCTION

Rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) generally uses smears made at the site of the procedure ("smear-based ROSE"). It requires considerable time, generally 2 individuals, technical expertise, and it can be difficult to estimate material available for ancillary studies. We developed an alternative ROSE using liquid-based cytology ThinPrep with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain ("liquid-based ROSE") and assessed its advantages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinicians rinse the sample(s) into CytoRich Red and send to Pathology. A defined proportion of the needle rinse is removed for a ThinPrep stained with a rapid H&E. Adequacy and diagnosis were compared to final outcome. Total time was recorded.

RESULTS

Among 52 liquid-based ROSE readings, 28 (53.8%) were interpreted as "adequate" with final as adequate; 17 (32.7%) were interpreted as "inadequate" with final as inadequate; 7 (13.5%) were interpreted as "inadequate" with final as adequate. Of 23 readings provided with onsite diagnosis, 15 (65.2%) were interpreted as definitive positive or negative diagnoses; 6 (26%) were interpreted as nondiagnostic; and 2 (8.7%) were interpreted as atypical. All definitive diagnoses were concordant with final diagnoses. The time for liquid ROSE performance ranges from 6 to 22 minutes (mean: 13 minutes) and required only 1 individual.

CONCLUSIONS

Liquid-based ROSE allows accurate adequacy determination and diagnosis, takes about 15 minutes of cytologist time, and can be performed by just 1 person. The technique produces well-preserved and stained slides, it may allow a better estimation of the total amount of material in the specimen vial and may provide a better platform for telecytology.

Values of different specimen preparation methods for the diagnosis of lung cancer by endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration

Background

Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been become an important procedure for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Our research identified the effects of different pathological preparation on the diagnosis of lung cancer for specimens obtained by biopsy.

Methods

Patients were clinically considered if lung cancer was accompanied by mediastinal or hilar lymph node enlargement between March 2014 and November 2017. Specimens obtained by EBUS-TBNA were treated by three methods: traditional smear cytology, liquid-based cytology (LBC) and histopathology.

Results

Of a total of 154 puncture sites from 153 patients, the total positive rate of combination for the three pathological treatment types (histopathology, direct traditional smear, and LBC) was 77.3%. The diagnostic positive rate for histopathology was 68.6%, direct traditional smear was 65.6%, and LBC was 60.4%; there was no significant differences among the three single pathological treatment types (P = 0.29), but there was a statistically significant difference between the combination of three treatments and any single pathological treatment type (P = 0.01). The diagnostic sensitivities of histopathology combined with traditional smear and histopathology combined LBC were 94.4 and 92.8%, respectively, the specificities and PPVs were both 100%, and the diagnostic accuracies were 95.5 and 94.2%, respectively; the sensitivities, specificities and diagnostic accuracies above were all higher than those of single specimen treatment and lower than those of the three combined.

Conclusion

When EBUS-TBNA is used for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer, the use of histopathological sections combined with direct cytological smear should be sufficient and is the most economical choice.

Processing and Reporting of Cytology Specimens from Mediastinal Lymph Nodes Collected using Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: A State-of-the-Art Review

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is presently the preferred modality for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes. There is an unmet need for standardization of processing and reporting of cytology specimens obtained by EBUS-TBNA. The manuscript is a state-of-the-art review on the technical aspects of processing and reporting of EBUS-TBNA specimens. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database, and the available evidence was discussed among the authors. The evidence suggests that at least one air-dried and one alcohol-fixed slide should be prepared from each lymph node pass. The remaining material should be utilized for microbiological analysis (in saline) and cell block preparation (10% formalin or other solutions). Wherever available, rapid-onsite evaluation should be performed to assess the adequacy of the sample and guide the need for additional material. The lymph node aspirate should also be collected in Roswell Park Memorial Institute solution in cases where lymphoma is under consideration. The use of liquid-based cytology provides good quality specimens that are free from blood and air-drying artifacts and can be used wherever available. Sample adequacy and the diagnostic category should be furnished separately in the cytology report.

Comparative Analysis for Diagnostic Yield of Small Cell Lung Cancer by Cytology and Histology During the Same Bronchoscopic Procedure

BACKGROUND

Biopsy, brushing, and transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) are the most common methods used for the diagnosis of small cell lung cancer during the same diagnostic bronchoscopic procedure. However, it is not clear which method provides better results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of 140 patients who had undergone video bronchoscopy for diagnostic purposes. Bronchial brushings were obtained from all subjects. Biopsy specimens were also obtained from all subjects, except for 6 cases that could not be sampled; the TBNA method was used for some special lesions. The results were analyzed separately by histology and cytology.

RESULTS

The diagnostic yield of cytology was significantly greater than that of histology (P < .01) and that of conventional smear preparations in cytology was obviously greater than that of hematoxylin and eosin stains in histology (P < .01). The false-negative results were significantly lower with cytology than with histology (P < .01). Also, the cases of sampling site restriction with cytology were distinctly less than those with histology (P < .05). Stretch deformation of the tissue structure and cell morphology was the main reason for the false-negative results in the histologic diagnosis. The use of TBNA resolved all 4 cases of hilar adenopathy and 2 cases of lesions outside the bronchus. Multiple brushings of the tissue adjacent to cancer tissue and liquid-based preparations of cancerous necrotic tissue can significantly reduce the false-negative results from biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic yield of cytologic examination of brushings and TBNA for small cell lung cancer was superior to that of histologic examination of hematoxylin and eosin stains and immunohistochemistry.

The implementation of liquid-based cytology for lung and pleural-based diseases

OBJECTIVE

First introduced for the processing of cervico-vaginal samples, liquid-based cytology (LBC) soon found application in nongynecological specimens, including bronchoscopic brushings, washings and transcutaneous and transbronchial aspiration biopsy of the lung as well as pleural effusions. This article reviews the existing literature related to these specimens along with the authors' own experience.

STUDY DESIGN

A literature review was conducted through Ovid MEDLINE and PubMed search engines using several key words.

RESULTS

Most of the literature is based on data collected through the use of split samples. The data confirms that the use of LBC is an acceptable, and sometimes superior, alternative to the conventional preparations (CP). LBC offers several advantages, including the ability to transport in a stable collecting media, elimination of obscuring elements, ease of screening, excellent preservation, random representative sample, and application of ancillary techniques on additional preparations. Some diagnostic pitfalls related to the introduced artifacts were reported.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of LBC offers many advantages over CP and has a diagnostic accuracy that is equal to or surpasses that of CP. LBC affords a bridge to the future application of molecular and other ancillary techniques to cytology. Knowledge of the morphological artifacts is useful at the early stages of implementation.