Treatment outcomes of 70 cases of early esophageal carcinoma: 12 years of experience

Considering gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy as a potential treatment for advanced oesophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine has been proved to be effective in many advanced cancer. However, almost all trials failed to demonstrate the response rate of gemcitabine-based combination schedules on oesophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

A systematic meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) was performed to investigate the efficacy of gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy in EC treatment. Clinical trials were collected during the period ranging from January 2000 to November 2018 by searching different databases. Odds-ratios (ORs) of response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR) and grade 3-4 toxicity rates (TRs) were extracted as presented in retrieved studies.

RESULTS

Fourteen trials (1024 patients) were selected for the final analysis. The results showed that RR and DCR of gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy demonstrated a significant advantage for non-gemcitabine therapy (OR for RR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.16-1.96; P = .002; OR for DCR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.19-2.32, P = .003). Toxicities of gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy on gastrointestinal tract (OR, 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.63, P = .0001) were less frequent compared to that of the non-gemcitabine therapy.

CONCLUSION

The improvements of gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy on RR, CDR and reduction of gastrointestinal tract, hepatic and renal for EC patients suggests that the combined chemotherapy based on gemcitabine could be a potential treatment options for advanced EC.

Construction of a risk model for the development of metachronous squamous cell carcinoma after endoscopic resection of esopahageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Previously, we identified that rs1229984 in ADH1B, rs671 in ALDH2, and smoking status were independently associated with the risk of developing metachronous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) after endoscopic resection (ER) for esophageal SCC (ESCC). However, this analysis included cases with short-term follow-up. In the present study, we investigated the environmental and genetic factors associated with developing metachronous SCC using long-term follow-up observation after ER for ESCC.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty ESCC patients who underwent treatment with ER were followed up using endoscopy for ≥ 30 months. We investigated the incidence of, and genetic/environmental factors associated with, metachronous SCC development after ER for ESCC. We also analyzed the potential risk factors for multiple metachronous SCC development using Cox's proportional hazards model. Moreover, we constructed a risk model for the development of metachronous SCC after ER for ESCC.

RESULTS

Male, rs1229984, rs671, alcohol consumption (> 20 g/day), smoking, and multiple Lugol-voiding lesions (LVLs) significantly affected the incidence of multiple metachronous SCCs. Multiple Cox proportional analysis revealed that rs1229984, rs671, alcohol consumption, smoking, and multiple LVLs were independently associated with the risk of developing metachronous SCC. Patients who had ≤ 2 risk factors did not develop metachronous SCC, and the risk of developing metachronous SCC in patients with ≥ 3 risk factors was significantly higher than in patients with ≤ 2 risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The risk model using these 5 genetic and environmental factors is useful as an indication for multiple metachronous development in ESCC patients.

ADH1B and ALDH2 are associated with metachronous SCC after endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

A previous genome‐wide association study identified two novel esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) susceptibility genes, ADH1B and ALDH2. We investigated the characteristics of ESCC, and the relationship between metachronous esophageal and/or pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and the ADH1B & ALDH2 risk alleles. One hundred and seventeen superficial ESCC patients who underwent treatment with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were followed up using endoscopy for ≥12 months. First, we performed a replication analysis to confirm the relationship between ESCC and the ADH1B & ALDH2 risk alleles using 117 superficial ESCC cases and 1125 healthy controls. Next, we investigated the incidence and genetic/environmental factors associated with metachronous SCC development after ESD. We also analyzed the potential risk factors for metachronous SCC development using Cox's proportional hazards model. rs1229984 GG located on ADH1B and rs671 GA located on ALDH2 were significantly associated with ESCC progression (P = 7.93 × 10⁻⁴ and P = 1.04 × 10⁻⁵). Patients with rs1229984 GG, those with rs671 GA, smokers, heavy alcohol drinkers (44 g/day ethanol), and presence of multiple Lugol‐voiding lesions (LVLs) developed metachronous SCC more frequently (P = 3.20 × 10⁻³, 7.00 × 10⁻⁴, 4.00 × 10⁻⁴, 2.15 × 10⁻², and 4.41 × 10⁻³, respectively), with hazard ratios were 2.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.43–5.63), 4.57 (95% CI = 1.80–15.42), 4.84 (95% CI = 1.89–16.41), and 2.34 (95% CI = 1.12–5.31), respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that rs1229984 GG, rs671 GA, and smoking status were independently associated with the risk of developing metachronous SCCs after ESD. Moreover, we found cumulative effects of these two genetic factors (rs1229984 GG and rs671 GA) and one environmental factor (tobacco smoking) which appear to increase metachrous SCCs after ESD of ESCC risk approximately nearly 12‐fold. Our findings elucidated the crucial role of multiple genetic variations in ADH1B and ALDH2 as biomarkers of metachronous ESCC.

Older versus younger patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, and stomach: a pooled analysis of eight consecutive North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) trials

Whether elderly patients with metastatic esophageal, gastroesophageal, and gastric cancer do as well with chemotherapy as their younger counterparts was investigated in this pooled analysis. In total, 367 patients from 8 consecutive, first-line trials were included: i) etoposide + cisplatin; ii) 5-fluorourucil + leucovorin; iii) 5-fluorouracil + levamisole; iv) irinotecan; v) docetaxel + irinotecan; vi) oxaliplatin + capecitabine; vii) docetaxel + capecitabine; and viii) bortezomib + paclitaxel + carboplatin. One hundred and fifty-four (42%) patients were > or =65 years old (range: 65-86), and 213 younger (range: 20-64). Elderly patients had worse performance scores (2-3): 19 vs. 8% (p<0.0001). Rates of grade 3+ adverse events across all chemotherapy cycles in univariate and multivariate analyses (adjusted for gender, performance score, and stratified by individual study) were higher among elderly patients. Rates of neutropenia, fatigue, infection, and stomatitis in elderly vs. younger patients were 31 vs. 29% (p=0.02 by multivariate analyses); 15 vs. 5% (p=0.01); 9 vs. 4% (p=0.03); 6 vs. 1% (p=0.04). In contrast, duration of chemotherapy, overall survival, and progression-free survival were comparable. Although age should not preclude trial entry, these adverse event rates suggest a need to develop more tolerable regimens for older patients with these malignancies.

The safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and non-endoscopic approaches to the management of early esophageal cancer: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, management of early cancer (stages 0-IIA) has comprised esophagectomy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Recent efforts to improve outcomes and minimize side-effects have focussed on minimally invasive, endoscopic treatments that remove lesions while sparing healthy tissue. This review assesses their safety and efficacy/effectiveness relative to traditional, non-endoscopic treatments for early esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies was performed using Cochrane guidelines. Bibliographic databases searched to identify relevant English language studies published in the last 3 years included: PubMed (i.e., MEDLINE and additional sources), EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, the UK Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS EED, DARE and HTA) databases, EconLit and Web of Science. Web sites of professional associations, relevant cancer organizations, clinical practice guidelines, and clinical trials were also searched. Two independent reviewers selected, critically appraised, and extracted information from studies.

RESULTS

The review included 75 studies spanning 3124 patients and 10 forms of treatment. Most studies were of short term duration and non-comparative. Adverse events reported across studies of endoscopic techniques were similar and less significant compared to those in the studies of non-endoscopic techniques. Complete response rates were slightly lower for photodynamic therapy (PDT) relative to the other endoscopic techniques, possibly due to differences in patient populations across studies. No studies compared overall or cause-specific survival in patients who received endoscopic treatments vs. those who received non-endoscopic treatments.

DISCUSSION

Based on findings from this review, there is no single "best practice" approach to the treatment of early esophageal cancer.

Surgical treatments for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus reaching to the muscularis mucosa or the upper third of the submucosal layer

We studied the surgical treatments of patients with either esophageal cancer reaching to the muscularis mucosae (m3) or with a slight invasion of the submucosa (sm1). We reviewed the records and examined the clinicopathological features of 29 patients with m3 or sm1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who had undergone surgery. Lymph node metastasis was noted in 6.3% (1 patient) of patients with m3 cancers and in 38.5% (5 patients) of those with sm1 cancers. The incidence of lymph node metastasis was higher in the sm1 than in the m3 group, but the difference was not significant. Lymphatic invasion (ly) was noted in 12.3% (2 patients) of patients with m3 cancers and in 53.8% (7 patients) of those with sm1 cancers. The incidence of ly was significantly higher in the sm1 group than in the m3 group (P<0.05). In a multivariate analysis of factors for predicting lymph node metastasis, the presence of ly was the only significant predictor (P<0.05). The preoperative diagnostic accuracies of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and an upper gastrointestinal series (UGS) for predicting depth of invasion were 27.8, 31.0 and 41.4%, respectively, with the majority of the misdiagnoses being overestimations. In conclusion, we suggested that ly is associated with lymph node metastasis in m3 or sm1 esophageal cancer. This association is significant for treatment-related decision making.

Analysis of Survival Rates of Patients Diagnosed With Incipient Esophagic Cancer

Background

Esophagic cancer incidence is extremely variable worldwide. Also, the global survival rate has not oscillated significantly since last decade. Most of the worse prognoses are found among patients with advanced stages. Despite that, around 10% of cases occur in patients with initial stage, which strongly associate these patients with unfavorable prognosis. We sought to analyze the impact of time free of disease and global survival rates of patients with initial stage of esophagic cancer.

Methods

We studied 18 patients with initial stage of esophagic cancer (stage 0 and I), examined and treated at Hospital de Cancer de Barretos between 1990 and 2005.

Results

The vast majority of patients were male (83.3%) with age up to 49 yarest old (77.8%), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (88.9%) and stage I (83.3%). Most of them were smoker (60.0%) and etilist (62.5%). There were 38.9% of the patients with comorbities like dysphagia and epigastralgia correlated to other pathological conditions. We found free disease rates of 100% and 82.5%, respectively for 12 and 36 months. The significant prognostic evidence was the age, epigastralgia symptoms and chemotherapy. From 18 patients, 6 passed away during the period of 36 months follow up due to cancer consequences. The probabilities of global survival were 76.7% and 64.4% after 12 and 36 months, respectively, and none of the analyzed variables influenced in theses rates.

Conclusions

Our data ratifies those from previous reported. The global survival rates were worse than reported by literature, maybe in consequence of the poor clinical condition of many patients which limited the option for more aggressive therapy.

Identification of aberrant promoter methylation of EDNRB gene in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes is a major contributor to neoplastic transformation and is an area of intense research. The purpose of the present study was to identify the epigenetic changes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methylation-sensitive arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction analysis was used on 21 matched ESCC tumors and adjacent normal tissues. Through this screen we identified a frequently methylated fragment that showed a high homology to the 5' CpG island of endothelin receptor type B (EDNRB) gene. The methylation status of the EDNRB gene was then detected by bisulfite sequencing and the levels of EDNRB mRNA were detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In addition, the effects of a methylation inhibitor 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine on EDNRB mRNA expression was determined in cells of an ESCC cell lines. Hypermethylation of the 5' CpG island of EDNRB was found in 5 out of 21 (23.8%) primary tumors. Real-time PCR analysis demonstrated that EDNRB mRNA expression was significantly reduced in tumors showing high promoter methylation compared with paired normal tissues, whereas there is no significant difference between other paired samples. In addition, treatment of ESCC cell line with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine led to reexpression of the EDNRB transcript, which is correlated with the reversal of the methylation status of EDNRB promoter. In conclusion, promoter hypermethylation of EDNRB gene, which is associated with the loss of EDNRB mRNA expression, may play a role in the development of ESCC.