Colorectal carcinoma in the young

Rectal cancer in young adults: a series of 102 patients at a tertiary care centre in India

OBJECTIVE

Rectal cancer in young patients is uncommon. There is little information on rectal cancer in young adults in India. The aim of this study was to determine the relative incidence of rectal cancer in young patients in India and identify any differences in histological grade and pathological stage between younger and older cohorts.

METHOD

All adult patients presenting at a tertiary colorectal unit with primary rectal adenocarcinoma between September 2003 and August 2007 were included. Patients were divided into two groups: 40 years and younger, and older than 40 years. Details regarding patient demographics, preoperative assessment, management and tumour grade and stage were obtained from a prospectively maintained database.

RESULTS

One hundred and two of 287 patients (35.5%) were 40 or younger at presentation. Younger patients were more likely to present with less favourable histological features (52.0% vs 20.5% (P < 0.001)) and low rectal tumours (63.0% vs 50.0%) (P = 0.043), but were equally likely to undergo curative surgery compared to the older group (P = 0.629). Younger patients undergoing surgery had a higher pathological T stage (T0-2 18.9%, T3 62.3%, T4 19.7% vs 34.5%, 56.0%, 9.5%) (P = 0.027) and more advanced pathological N stage (N0 31.1%, N1 41.0%, N2 27.9% vs 53.4%, 26.7%, 17.2%) (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

The relative number of young patients with rectal cancer in this Indian series is higher than figures reported in western populations. The reasons for this are not clear. The histopathological features of rectal tumours in young patients in this study are consistent with similar studies in Western populations.

Rectal cancer in the young patient

PURPOSE

The purpose of this national study was to evaluate the results of treatment for young rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

This prospective study from the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Project includes all 2,283 patients younger than aged 70 years with adenocarcinoma of the rectum from November 1993 to December 1999. Patients younger than aged 40 years (n = 45), 40 to 44 years (n = 87), 45 to 49 years (n = 153), and 50 to 69 years (n = 1998) were compared for patient and tumor characteristics and five-year overall survival. Patients treated for cure (n = 1,354) were evaluated for local recurrence, distant metastasis, and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Patients younger than aged 40 years had significantly higher frequencies of poorly differentiated tumors (27 vs. 12-16 percent; P = 0.014), N2-stage (37 vs. 13-18 percent; P = 0.001), and distant metastases (38 vs. 19-24 percent; P = 0.019) compared with older patients. Among those treated for cure, 56 percent of the patients younger than aged 40 years developed distant metastases compared with 20 to 26 percent of the older patients (P = 0.003). Overall five-year survival was 54 percent for patients younger than aged 40 years compared with 71 to 88 percent for the older patients (P = 0.029). Age younger than 40 years was a significant independent prognostic factor and increased the risk for metastasis and death.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients younger than aged 40 years had a more advanced stage at the time of diagnosis and poor prognosis compared with older patients. Young patients treated for cure more often developed distant metastases and had inferior survival.

Young patients with colorectal cancer: how do they fare?

BACKGROUND

Younger patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) have long been thought to have a poorer prognosis than older patients. Recent overseas reports, however, have disputed this. The aim of the present study was to conduct a review of data on patients with colorectal cancer collected over a 29-year period at Princess Alexandra Hospital (PAH) to ascertain the outcome of a younger subset of patients at this hospital.

METHODS

The PAH Colorectal Project records on 2495 patients with malignancies of the colon, rectum and anus who were treated and followed since 1971, were analysed to determine clinical presentation, treatment and outcome. A group of 61 patients with colo-rectal adenocarcinoma was identified who were aged less than 40 years at presentation. Their clinical data were then compared with the larger group of older patients.

RESULTS

There were 30 male and 31 female patients in the younger group. A positive family history was the most consistent risk factor, present in 34% of patients. Despite this, only one patient out of 61 had been diagnosed as a result of a screening programme. The Australian Clinico-Pathological Stage (ACPS), histology and distribution of tumours corresponded to that of the older patients. The overall 5-year survival among younger patients was 53%. The 5-year survival rates in younger patients were better than that for older patients for ACPS A and B, reaching statistical significance for both of these stages.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that younger patients with colorectal cancer have the potential to do just as well as older ones. With the influence of a family history of colorectal cancer being very apparent in this group, greater emphasis should be placed on an adequate screening programme for them.

Young age is not a poor prognostic marker in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

There is still considerable controversy and debate regarding the features and prognosis of colorectal cancer in young patients.

METHODS

One hundred and ten patients (5.1 per cent) under the age of 40 years with colorectal cancer (group Y; male: female ratio 48:62) were compared with 2064 patients with colorectal cancer aged 40 years or more (group O; 917 women, 1147 men). Mode of presentation, stage at diagnosis, tumour characteristics and survival were analysed.

RESULTS

Predisposing malignant conditions and family history of colorectal cancer were present in 20.9 per cent of patients in group Y versus 2.2 per cent in group O (P < 0.001). Common chief complaints included change in bowel habits, bleeding from the rectum and a significantly higher incidence of abdominal pain in group Y. There was no difference in stage at presentation between the two groups (the proportion of Dukes stage A, B, C and 'D' lesions in group Y was 8.2, 24.5, 37.3 and 30.0 per cent respectively versus 10.5, 27.9, 33.4 and 28.1 per cent in group O). Tumour site and characteristics were similar in both groups. The incidence of mucinous/signet ring cell and poor grade tumours was 6.9 and 11.8 per cent respectively in group Y and 4.5 and 10.5 per cent in group O. With a mean follow-up of 31.8 months, the overall 5-year survival rate was 54.8 per cent in group Y and 54.1 per cent in group O. Comparing stage for stage, survival was not significantly different in the two groups. However, the adjusted hazard ratios of the age groups Y, M (40-59 years), S (60-79 years), and E (80 years and above) were 1.3, 1 (baseline for calculations), 1.4 and 2.4 respectively, suggesting an adverse outcome for patients in group Y compared with patients aged 40-59 years.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed no difference in tumour characteristics and survival in patients with colorectal cancer aged less than 40 years compared with those aged above 40 years. However, a higher hazard ratio in the youngest group may connote a worse prognosis than that for those aged 40-59 years. A significant family history of colorectal cancer and predisposing conditions in the young warrants aggressive screening, surveillance and treatment of the underlying conditions. The detection of colorectal cancer in young patients should be no different from that in the old but demands a high index of suspicion.

Clinical significance of rectal cancer in young patients

Thirty-nine patients (age 40 years and younger) with rectal cancer treated at the Mount Sinai Hospital between 1967 and 1985 were studied. Their mean age was 34 years (range, 21 to 40). A positive family history for colorectal cancer was found in six patients (15 percent). Fifty percent of patients under age 30 had metastatic disease at diagnosis. Twenty-seven patients (69 percent) had potentially curative resections. Of these, 17 (63 percent) had lymph-node metastasis. This rate is twice as high as in a group of 315 patients with rectal cancer over age 40 (31 percent). The overall five-year survival for young patients having curative resection was 53 percent. Noncolorectal cancer occurred in three patients in this series and six patients also had first-degree relatives with noncolorectal cancer. Young patients with rectal cancer appear to belong to a high-risk cancer group which often seems to have a genetic pattern of predisposition.