MODIFIED CLASSIFICATION FOR ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE GASTRO-OESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION

Systematic review with meta-analysis: prevalence of prior and concurrent Barrett's oesophagus in oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

The proportions of patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) diagnosed by Barrett's oesophagus surveillance or with pre-existing Barrett's oesophagus are unclear.

AIM

To estimate the prevalence of prior and concurrent Barrett's oesophagus diagnosis among patients with OAC or oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas (OGJAC).

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Embase to identify studies published 1966-1/8/2020 that examined the prevalence of prior (≥6 months) or concurrent Barrett's diagnosis (at cancer diagnosis) among OAC and OGJAC patients. Random effects models estimated overall and stratified pooled prevalence rates.

RESULTS

A total of 69 studies, including 33 002 OAC patients (53 studies) and 2712 patients with OGJAC (28 studies) were included. The pooled prevalence of prior Barrett's oesophagus diagnosis in OAC was 11.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.4%-15.6%). The prevalence of prior Barrett's oesophagus diagnosis was higher in single-centre resection studies (16.0%, 95% CI 8.7%-24.9%) than population-based cancer registry studies (8.4%, 95% CI 5.5%-11.9%). The prevalence of concurrent Barrett's oesophagus in OAC was 56.6% (95% CI 48.5%-64.6%). Studies with 100% early stage OAC had higher prevalence of concurrent Barrett's oesophagus (91.3%, 95% CI 82.4%-97.6%) than studies with <50% early OAC (39.7%, 95% CI 33.7%-45.9%). In OGJAC, the prevalence of prior and concurrent Barrett's oesophagus was 23.2% (95% CI 7.5%-44.0%) and 26.3% (95% CI 17.8%-35.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with OAC have Barrett's oesophagus. Our meta-analysis found ~12% of OAC patients had prior Barrett's diagnosis, but concurrent Barrett's oesophagus was found in ~57% at the time of OAC diagnosis. This represents a considerable missed opportunity for Barrett's oesophagus screening.

Interrelationships between tumor proliferative activity, leucocyte and macrophage infiltration, systemic inflammatory response, and survival in patients selected for potentially curative resection for gastroesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

A number of accepted criteria, including pathological tumor, node, metastasis system stage, lymph node metastasis, and tumor differentiation, predict survival in patients undergoing surgery for gastroesophageal cancer. We examined the interrelationships between standard clinicopathological factors, systemic and local inflammatory responses, tumor proliferative activity, and survival.

METHODS

The interrelationships between the systemic inflammatory response (Glasgow prognostic score, mGPS), standard clinicopathological factors, local inflammatory response (Klintrup criteria, macrophage infiltration), and tumor proliferative activity (Ki-67) were examined by immunohistochemistry in 100 patients (44 esophageal [19 squamous, 25 adenocarcinoma], 19 junctional, and 37 gastric cancers) selected for potentially curative resection.

RESULTS

The minimum follow-up was 59 months. On multivariate survival analysis, lymph node ratio (hazard ratio [HR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.40, P < 0.05), tumor differentiation (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.45-4.77, P = 0.001), mGPS (HR 3.91, 95% CI 1.96-8.11, P < 0.001), Klintrup score (HR 3.47, 95% CI 1.14-10.55, P < 0.05), and Ki-67 (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.96, P < 0.05) were independently associated with cancer-specific survival. A higher lymph node ratio was associated with poor tumor differentiation (P < 0.05), low-grade Klintrup criteria (P < 0.005), and low tumor proliferative activity (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Tumor proliferation rate and local and systemic inflammatory responses are important predictors of survival, albeit in a heterogeneous cohort of patients including esophageal, junctional, and gastric cancers. These scores may be combined with accepted tumor-based factors to improve prediction of outcome.