Is on-table rectal stump washout necessary?

Reasonable application of rectal washout in surgery for rectal cancer: Influence on prognosis and recurrence

The growth of residual tumor cells may cause postoperative colorectal anastomotic recurrence, which mainly exists in the intestine; however, rectal washout can significantly reduce the number of free tumor cells in the intestinal cavity and decrease the local recurrence rate. Clinical application of rectal washout has been tried in operation, but the effect remains controversial. This paper mainly introduces the method of rectal washout, washout fluid type, amount of washout fluid, relation of rectal washout with local recurrence, with emphasis on the influence of reasonable application of rectal washout on prognosis and recurrence of rectal cancer after surgery.

Evaluation of the presence of intraluminal cancer cells following rectal washout in rectal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

The presence of intraluminal tumour cells in colorectal cancer is known, as is their ability to implant in colorectal anastomoses, causing perianastomotic tumour growth. There is no consensus as to the volume and agent to use for rectal washout. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of our current routine for rectal washout in eliminating intraluminal tumour cells.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients undergoing low anterior resection or low Hartmann's procedure for rectal cancer at our unit were included. After the pelvic dissection was completed, the bowel was cross-clamped distal to the tumour and the prewashout sample (no. 1), was obtained by instilling 50 ml of saline and collecting the return fluid. A rectal washout followed using 500 ml of sterile water, 2 × 500 ml of 70 % ethanol and 500 ml of sterile water (sample no. 2-4) and the postwashout sample (no. 5) was obtained by using 50 ml of saline. The samples were examined and categorized as non-malignant or malignant at the Department of Pathology. The usual pathology report information was also assessed.

RESULTS

In 33 of the 60 patients, cancer cells were identified in the prewashout sample. The rectal washout eliminated intraluminal cancer cells in 30 of the 33 patients. All of the remaining 3 had a higher blood loss (p = 0.026) and a tendency towards more polypoidal tumours (p = 0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

A rectal washout volume larger than 2,000 ml might be necessary to eliminate all intraluminal tumour cells in total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

The effect of intraoperative rectal washout on local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Implantation of exfoliated cancer cells has been suggested as a possible mechanism of local recurrence at the site of colorectal anastomosis. Intraoperative rectal washout has been suggested to eliminate free cancer cells; however, there is no conclusive evidence of a beneficial effect of intraoperative rectal washout on local recurrence after anterior resection of rectal cancer.

METHODS

Studies published through February 2012 evaluating the impact of intraoperative rectal washout for local recurrence or positive cytology from donuts wash were identified by an electronic literature search. A meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models to compute risk ratio (RR) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 5,395 patients. Eight studies evaluated overall local recurrence, including anastomotic recurrence, and five of the eight studies evaluated anastomotic recurrence separately. Two studies evaluated positive cytology from donuts wash. Local recurrence rate was 5.79% in the washout group and 10.05% in the no washout group-a difference that was statistically significant (RR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.46-0.71; P < 0.00001). Rectal washout significantly reduced the risk of anastomotic recurrence (RR = 0.3; 95% CI = 0.12-0.71; P = 0.007). No influence of rectal washout was observed on positive cytology from donuts wash.

CONCLUSIONS

From the results of this meta-analysis, it may be justified to recommend intraoperative rectal washout to prevent local recurrence in rectal cancer surgery.

Rectal washout and local recurrence in rectal resection for cancer: a meta-analysis

AIM

The effectiveness of rectal washout was compared with no washout for the prevention of local recurrence after anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer.

METHOD

The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed, OVID Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EBM Reviews, CINAHL and EMBASE.

RESULTS

Five nonrandomized studies including a total of 5012 patients were identified. Meta-analysis suggested that rectal washout significantly reduced the local recurrence rate (P < 0.0001; OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.43-0.74). It was also significantly lower after washout in patients having radical resection only (P = 0.0004; OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.39-0.76), patients treated by a curative resection (P < 0.0001; OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.42-0.72) and those undergoing preoperative radiotherapy (P = 0.04; OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.39-0.98).

CONCLUSION

Taking into account the limitations of the design of the included studies the meta-analysis showed that rectal washout is associated with reduced local recurrence and therefore should be routine during anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Rectal washout and local recurrence of cancer after anterior resection

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinomas of the rectum shed viable cells, which have the ability to implant. Intraoperative rectal washout decreases the amount and viability of these cells, but there is no conclusive evidence of the effect of rectal washout on local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

Data were analysed from a population-based registry of patients who had anterior resection from 1995 to 2002 and were followed for 5 years. Rectal washout was performed at the discretion of the surgeon. National inclusion of patients with rectal cancer and follow-up was near complete (approximately 97 and 98 per cent respectively).

RESULTS

A total of 4677 patients were analysed (3749 who had washout, 851 no washout and 77 with information missing); 52.0 per cent of patients in the washout group and 41.4 per cent in the no-washout group had preoperative radiotherapy (P < 0.001). Local recurrence rates were 6.0 and 10.2 per cent respectively (P < 0.001). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses produced odds ratios that favoured washout: 0.56 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.43 to 0.72) and 0.61 (0.46 to 0.80) respectively (both P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis restricted to patients who had curative surgery, the odds ratio was 0.59 (95 per cent c.i. 0.44 to 0.78; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There was a more favourable outcome in patients after rectal washout than without.