Lp(a) and conventional risk profiles predict the severity of coronary stenosis in high-risk hospital-based patients

South Asian Cardiovascular Disease & Cancer Risk: Genetics & Pathophysiology

South Asians (SAs) are at heightened risk for cardiovascular disease as compared to other ethnic groups, facing premature and more severe coronary artery disease, and decreased insulin sensitivity. This disease burden can only be partially explained by conventional risk factors, suggesting the need for a specific cardiovascular risk profile for SAs. Current research, as explored through a comprehensive literature review, suggests the existence of population specific genetic risk factors such as lipoprotein(a), as well as population specific gene modulating factors. This review catalogues the available research on cardiovascular disease and genetics, anthropometry, and pathophysiology, and cancer genetics among SAs, with a geographical focus on the U.S. A tailored risk profile will hinge upon population customized classification and treatment guidelines, informed by continued research.

The coronary calcium score is a more accurate predictor of significant coronary stenosis than conventional risk factors in symptomatic patients: Euro-CCAD study

AIMS

In this retrospective study we assessed the predictive value of the coronary calcium score for significant (>50%) stenosis relative to conventional risk factors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We investigated 5515 symptomatic patients from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the USA. All had risk factor assessment, computed tomographic coronary angiogram (CTCA) or conventional angiography and a CT scan for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring. 1539 (27.9%) patients had significant stenosis, 5.5% of whom had zero CAC. In 5074 patients, multiple binary regression showed the most important predictor of significant stenosis to be male gender (B=1.07) followed by diabetes mellitus (B=0.70) smoking, hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension, family history of CAD and age but not obesity. When the log transformed CAC score was included, it became the most powerful predictor (B=1.25), followed by male gender (B=0.48), diabetes, smoking, family history and age but hypercholesterolaemia and hypertension lost significance. The CAC score is a more accurate predictor of >50% stenosis than risk factors regardless of the means of assessment of stenosis. The sensitivity of risk factors, CAC score and the combination for prediction of >50% stenosis when measured by conventional angiogram was considerably higher than when assessed by CTCA but the specificity was considerably higher when assessed by CTCA. The accuracy of CTCA for predicting >50% stenosis using the CAC score alone was higher (AUC=0.85) than using a combination of the CAC score and risk factors with conventional angiography (AUC=0.81).

CONCLUSION

In symptomatic patients, the CAC score is a more accurate predictor of significant coronary stenosis than conventional risk factors.

Lipoprotein (A): Better assessor of coronary heart disease risk in south Indian population

In an attempt to search for risk factors which can explain the increasing prevalence of coronary heart disease (CHD) in Indian population, we conducted a case-control study to assess the association of Lipoprotein (a)(Lp(a)) with CHD. One hundred and fifty one consecutive patients with clinical and angiographic evidence of CHD and forty-nine healthy controls were drawn for the study. Triglycerides, very low density cholesterol (VLDL-C), total cholesterol (total-C)/high density cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio, low density cholesterol (LDL-C)/HDL cholesterol ratio and Lp(a) were found to be higher in patients than controls. In female sex and in those with family history of CHD, higher total and LDL cholesterol levels were observed to be associated with higher Lp(a) levels. Lp(a) levels were also found to be higher in triple vessel disease than other vessel disease patients. Significant difference in Lp(a) levels were observed between normal coronaries vs. single and triple vessel disease(P<0.05) and also between single vs. double and triple vessel disease (P<0.01).Lp(a) levels correlated positively with vessel severity(P<0.005). Lp(a) levels >25 mg/dl were associated with coronary heart disease (Odds ratio 1.98 P<0.05 95% CI 0.007-1.18). Our findings suggest a cut-off level of 25mg/dl for determination of risk of CHD. Studies from different areas involving larger sample size are needed to confirm the findings of the present study.

Combined effects of small apolipoprotein (a) isoforms and small, dense LDL on coronary artery disease risk

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] consists of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)]. Both Lp(a) constituents are well-recognized risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD). This study investigates the interrelationship of apo(a) and LDL size, as well as their possible synergistic effect on the increase of CAD risk.

METHODS

One hundred nine CAD patients and 102 apparently healthy subjects were included in the study. Lp(a) concentration was measured using immunoturbidimetry. The sizes of apo(a) isoforms were determined by SDS-agarose gel electrophoresis followed by immunoblotting. LDL particle size was determined by gradient gel electrophoresis.

RESULTS

We found an inverse correlation between apo(a) size and Lp(a) concentration (r(2) = 31%, p <0.001 in the control group and r(2) = 35%, p <0.001 in the CAD group). Individuals with smaller apo(a) isoforms and small, dense LDL (sdLDL) >50% had the highest risk of CAD development (OR = 4.23, p = 0.017). The synergy index (SIM) for the combination of smaller apo(a) isoforms and sdLDL >50% was 1.2. Adjustment for Lp(a) and triacylglycerol concentrations eliminated smaller apo(a)/sdLDL >50% related risk (p = 0.233 and p = 0.09, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Smaller apo(a) isoforms appear to be superior to sdLDL for the assessment of CAD risk. Their combined effect is synergistic.

Plasma lipoprotein Lp(a), markers of haemostasis and inflammation, and risk and severity of coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

Elevated plasma (Lp(a)) levels may represent an independent risk factor for atherothrombotic complications but the relation between Lp(a) levels and the extent of coronary artery disease (CHD) has been discussed controversially. Little is known about potential atherothrombogenic mechanisms of Lp(a).

DESIGN

Case-control study.

METHODS

We assessed the relationship between plasma Lp(a) and angiographically defined CHD, evaluating the severity of coronary atherosclerosis by three different scores. A total of 312 patients with stable angina aged 40-68 years with at least one coronary stenosis > 50% were studied. A group of 479 voluntary blood donors matched for age and sex served as controls. A complete lipid profile and a large number of markers of coagulation, fibrinolysis and inflammation were measured.

RESULTS

Plasma levels of Lp(a) were significantly higher in patients (14.8 mg/dl; 5.4-47.1 mg/dl; median/interquartile range) than in controls (9.7 mg/dl; 3.5-25.3) (P<0.0001). In a logistic regression model, the fully adjusted Odds Ratio for CHD was 3.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-5.6, P<0.0001) for patients in the upper quartile of the Lp(a) distribution compared to the bottom quartile. There was no appreciable association between Lp(a) and apolipoproteins, markers of haemostasis, fibrinolysis and inflammation and the severity of CHD.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that elevated plasma Lp(a) levels may be an independent risk factor for CHD but unrelated to the severity and extension of CHD. Furthermore, there is no good evidence that the presumed link between Lp(a) and CHD is mediated by increased levels of markers of inflammation, or interference with markers of fibrinolysis or coagulation.

Overview of inherited metabolic disorders causing cardiovascular disease

Inherited metabolic disorders contribute importantly to adverse cardiovascular outcomes and affect all tissue types. This review summarizes some of the more important aspects. In the venous system, heterozygosities for the factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210G > A mutations are common and occur in 4% and 1%, respectively, of caucasians. They confer a 2- to 3- fold increase in risk of venous, but not arterial, thrombosis. Marfan syndrome affects the systemic circulation and has a population prevalence of about 1 in 4000. The more than 200 mutations responsible are in the fibrillin-1 gene (15q21.1) and mediate the characteristic skeletal, lens and aortic changes. There are two potentially lethal inherited disorders of cardiac conduction, the long QT and Brugada syndromes. The prevalence for each is about 1 in 10,000. On the other hand, autosomal dominant hypertrophic cardiomyopathies are relatively common, at 1 in 500, but with variable penetrance. Mutations are in the sarcomere proteins and more than 140 are known. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may be confused with Fabry disease, for which effective treatment is now available. Mutations in several genes have been shown to produce dilated cardiomyopathy in the young, but there is as yet no specific treatment. In fatty acid oxidation disorders, arrhythmias and cardiomyopathy occur during acute decompensation. An important recently established cause of cardiomyopathy is carnitine transporter defect; it is treated effectively with oral carnitine. The autosomal dominant arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia occurs with a prevalence of about 1 in 15,000 and presents with arrythmias and a dilated right ventricle. The mutations responsible have been mapped to chromosomes 1, 2, 10 and 14. Lysosomal storage disorders, the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and other connective-tissue disorders affect cardiac valves and vessels. In addition to the relatively common inherited lipoprotein disorders familial hypercholesterolaemia and familial combined hyperlipidaemia, an important dominantly inherited lipid variable contributing to coronary risk is lipoprotein(a). The gene is localized to chromosome 6 and there is full expression in childhood. Elevated lipoprotein(a) levels contribute to the occurrence and severity of early-onset coronary disease and add to the already enhanced risk in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.