Nasal mask positive pressure ventilation in paediatric patients with type II respiratory failure

[Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure. Clinical Practice Guidelines - on behalf of the German Society of Pneumology and Ventilatory Medicine]

The guideline update outlines the advantages as well as the limitations of NIV in the treatment of acute respiratory failure in daily clinical practice and in different indications.Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has a high value in therapy of hypercapnic acute respiratory failure, as it significantly reduces the length of ICU stay and hospitalization as well as mortality.Patients with cardiopulmonary edema and acute respiratory failure should be treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and oxygen in addition to necessary cardiological interventions. This should be done already prehospital and in the emergency department.In case of other forms of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure with only mild or moderately disturbed gas exchange (PaO2/FiO2 > 150 mmHg) there is no significant advantage or disadvantage compared to high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO). In severe forms of ARDS NIV is associated with high rates of treatment failure and mortality, especially in cases with NIV-failure and delayed intubation.NIV should be used for preoxygenation before intubation. In patients at risk, NIV is recommended to reduce extubation failure. In the weaning process from invasive ventilation NIV essentially reduces the risk of reintubation in hypercapnic patients. NIV is regarded useful within palliative care for reduction of dyspnea and improving quality of life, but here in concurrence to HFNO, which is regarded as more comfortable. Meanwhile NIV is also recommended in prehospital setting, especially in hypercapnic respiratory failure and pulmonary edema.With appropriate monitoring in an intensive care unit NIV can also be successfully applied in pediatric patients with acute respiratory insufficiency.

Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) by Nasal Mask for the Treatment of Respiratory Insufficiency Following Cardiac Surgery in Children

The authors present their experience with the use of bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) administered via a nasal mask to treat respiratory failure in three children following surgery for congenital heart disease. The three children developed progressive atelectasis, hypoxemia, and impending respiratory failure following tracheal extubation in the postoperative period. The use of BiPAP by nasal mask resulted in a decrease in the patients' respiratory rate, an increase in oxygen saturation and PaO2, a decrease in transcutaneous CO2, and resolution of atelectasis. The applications of this technique and the equipment required are reviewed.

Noninvasive Respiratory Support in Pediatrics

The conventional management of acute respiratory failure (ARF) consists of endotracheal intubation; this carries potential risks, including ventilator-associated pneumonia and laryngeal-tracheal damage [1,2]. Noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) is an alternative form of respiratory treatment which incorporates various techniques aimed at improving alveolar ventilation, oxygenation, and unloading of the respiratory muscles without the need for an invasive tracheal device. Because of its safety and effectiveness, the use of NRS has been adopted throughout the world. During the last 25 years, NRS techniques have increasingly been used in the treatment of both chronic respiratory failure and ARF in adult patients in several pathological conditions. NRS applied to adults in the acute setting has been found to improve outcome, reduce the rate of intubation, and decrease the rate of complications [3].

Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation in Pediatric Oncology Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure

The aim of the study was to describe our experience with bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation in oncology children with acute respiratory failure, hospitalized in a single tertiary pediatric tertiary center. This was a retrospective cohort study of all pediatric oncology patients in our center admitted to the intensive care unit with acute hypoxemic or hypercarbic respiratory failure from January 1999 through May 2006, who required mechanical ventilation with BiPAP. Fourteen patients met the inclusion criteria with a total of 16 events of respiratory failure or impending failure: 12 events were hypoxemic, 1 was combined hypercarbic and hypoxemic, and 3 had severe respiratory distress. Shortly after BiPAP ventilation initiation, there was a statistically significant improvement in the respiratory rate (40.4 ± 9.3 to 32.5 ± 10.1, P < .05] and a trend toward improvement in arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO 2; 71.3 ± 32.7 to 104.6 ± 45.6, P = .055). The improvement in the respiratory status was sustained for at least 12 hours. In 12 (75%) events there was a need for sedation during ventilation; 12 children needed inotropic support during the BiPAP ventilation. Bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation failed in 3 (21%) children who were switched to conventional ventilation. All of them have died during the following days. One child was recategorized to receive palliative care while on BiPAP ventilator and was not intubated. In 12 of 16 BiPAP interventions (75%; 11 patients), the children survived to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) discharge without invasive ventilation. No major complications were noted during BiPAP ventilation. Bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation is well tolerated in pediatric oncology patients suffering from acute respiratory failure and may offer noninferior outcomes compared with those previously described for conventional invasive ventilation. It appears to be a feasible initial option in children with malignancy experiencing acute respiratory failure.

A five-year experience with the use of BiPAP in a pediatric intensive care unit population

The authors retrospectively reviewed their experience with bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) to treat respiratory insufficiency in pediatric patients over a 5-year period. After excluding patients on chronic home BiPAP and those in whom BiPAP was used to facilitate tracheal extubation (because there were no pre-BiPAP values on which to judge its efficacy), the study cohort included 45 patients (1.5 to 22 years) in whom BiPAP was used for acute respiratory insufficiency. The primary indication for BiPAP was a primary pulmonary parenchymal process in 29 patients and postoperative atelectasis with respiratory insufficiency following cardiac or upper abdominal surgery in 16 patients. There were no differences in the pre-BiPAP values of oxygen requirement, PCO2, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate between the 2 groups. With the application of BiPAP in patients with primary pulmonary parenchymal disease, there was a decreased oxygen requirement, PCO2, and respiratory rate. No change in oxygen saturation was noted. In patients with postoperative respiratory insufficiency, there was an improvement in all 4 parameters. There was no difference in post-BiPAP values of oxygen requirement, respiratory rate, or PCO2 between the 2 groups. The post-BiPAP oxygen saturation was greater in patients with postoperative respiratory insufficiency (96% +/- 4%) than in patients with primary pulmonary parenchymal disease (92% +/- 6%, P = .02). Endotracheal intubation was required in 11 of 29 patients with primary pulmonary parenchymal pathology versus 1 of 16 patients with postoperative atelectasis and/or respiratory insufficiency (P = .03). The chances of requiring intubation were greater in patients < or = 6 years of age (relative risk 1.9), if the oxygen requirement did not decrease to less than 60% within the first 24 hours of BiPAP use (relative risk 3.3) and if there were any PCO2 values > or = 55 mmHg during the first 24 hours of BiPAP use (relative risk 9.8). No severe complications to BiPAP were noted. BiPAP safely and effectively improves the respiratory status of and might decrease the need for endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients with acute respiratory insufficiency of various etiologies.

Nasal mask bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation for diaphragmatic paralysis after pediatric open-heart surgery

A 2-year-old boy underwent surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Topical cooling of the heart with ice slush was used during the operation. Diaphragmatic paralysis occurred after the operation, inducing severe respiratory distress. To avoid repeated intubation and tracheostomy, the patient was placed on nasal mask bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation. After ventilatory support with BiPAP for 40 days, the patient recovered spontaneously from the paralysis. No sedation was required during this time. This report illustrates the usefulness of BiPAP for a pediatric patient with diaphragmatic paralysis after cardiac surgery.

Pediatric noninvasive positive pressure ventilation

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in both acute hypoxic and hypercarbic forms of pediatric respiratory failure, including its mechanism of action and implementation. DATA SOURCES: Studies were identified through a MEDLINE search using respiratory failure, pediatrics, noninvasive ventilation, and mechanical ventilation as key words. STUDY SELECTION: All original studies, including case reports, relating to the use of noninvasive positive pressure in pediatric respiratory failure were included. Because of the paucity of published literature on pediatric NPPV, no study was excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Study design, numbers and diagnoses of patients, types of noninvasive ventilator, ventilator modes, outcome measures, and complications were extracted and compiled. DATA SYNTHESIS: For acute hypoxic respiratory failure, all the studies reported improvement in oxygenation indices and avoidance of endotracheal intubation. The average duration of NPPV therapy before noticeable clinical improvement was 3 hrs in most studies, and NPPV was applied continuously for 72 hrs before resolution of acute respiratory distress. In patients with acute hypercarbic respiratory failure, application of NPPV resulted in reduction of work of breathing, reduction in CO(2) tension, and increased serum bicarbonate and pH. These patients are older than patients in the acute hypoxic respiratory failure group and, in addition to improved blood gas indices, they reported improvement in subjective symptoms of dyspnea. Improvement in gas exchange abnormalities and subjective symptoms occurred within the same time span (the first 3 hrs) as in the acute hypoxic respiratory failure group. However, use of noninvasive techniques in patients with acute hypercarbic respiratory failure continued after resolution of acute symptoms. Complications related to protracted use of NPPV were common in this group. CONCLUSIONS: NPPV has limited benefits in a group of carefully selected pediatric patients with acute hypoxic and hypercarbic forms of respiratory failure. The routine use of this technique in pediatric respiratory failure needs to be studied in randomized controlled trials and better-defined patient subsets.

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation facilitates tracheal extubation after laryngotracheal reconstruction in children

Tracheal extubation after laryngotracheal reconstruction in children may be complicated by postoperative tracheal edema and pulmonary dysfunction. The replacement of a tracheal tube in this situation may exacerbate the existing injury to the tracheal mucosa, complicating subsequent attempts at tracheal extubation. We present two cases where noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation was employed to treat partial airway obstruction and respiratory failure in two children following laryngotracheal reconstruction. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation served as a bridge between mechanical ventilation via a tracheal tube and spontaneous breathing, providing airway stenting and ventilatory support while tracheal edema and pulmonary dysfunction were resolved. Under appropriate conditions, noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation may be useful in the management of these patients.