Three cases of adenocarcinoma following restorative proctocolectomy with hand-sewn anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a review of reported cases in the literature

Incidence and Risk Factors of Cancer in the Anal Transitional Zone and Ileal Pouch following Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the intervention of choice for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis requiring surgery. One of the long-term complications is pouch cancer, having a poor prognosis. The risk of high-grade dysplasia and cancer in the anal transitional zone and ileal pouch after 20 years is estimated to be 2 to 4.5% and 3 to 10% in ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis, respectively. The risk factors for ulcerative colitis are the presence of pre-operative dysplasia or cancer, disease duration > 10 years and severe villous atrophy. For familial polyposis, the risk factors are the number of pre-operative polyps > 1000, surgery with stapled anastomosis and the duration of follow-up. In the case of ulcerative colitis, a pouchoscopy should be performed annually if one of the following is present: dysplasia and cancer at surgery, primary sclerosing cholangitis, villous atrophy and active pouchitis (every 5 years without any of these factors). In the case of familial polyposis, endoscopy is recommended every year including chromoendoscopy. Even if anal transitional zone and ileal pouch cancers seldom occur following proctectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis, the high mortality rate associated with this complication warrants endoscopic monitoring.

Risk of Rectal Cancer After Colectomy for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A National Cohort Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have an increased risk of rectal cancer, therefore reconstruction with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) generally is preferred to an ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) after subtotal colectomy. Similarly, completion proctectomy is recommended for patients with ileostomy and a diverted rectum, although this approach has been questioned because anti-inflammatory agents might reduce cancer risk. We performed a national cohort study in Sweden to assess the risk of rectal cancer in patients with UC who have an IRA, IPAA, or diverted rectum after subtotal colectomy.

METHODS

We collected data from the Swedish National Patient Register for a cohort of 5886 patients with UC who underwent subtotal colectomy with an IRA, IPAA, or diverted rectum from 1964 through 2010. Patients who developed rectal cancer were identified from the Swedish National Cancer Register. The risk of rectal cancer was compared between this cohort and the general population by standardized incidence ratio analysis.

RESULTS

Rectal cancer occurred in 20 of 1112 patients (1.8%) who received IRA, 1 of 1796 patients (0.06%) who received an IPAA, and 25 of 4358 patients (0.6%) with a diverted rectum. Standardized incidence ratios for rectal cancer were 8.7 in patients with an IRA, 0.4 in patients with an IPAA, and 3.8 in patients with a diverted rectum. Risk factors for rectal cancer were primary sclerosing cholangitis in patients with an IRA (hazard ratio, 6.12), and colonic severe dysplasia or cancer before subtotal colectomy in patients with a diverted rectum (hazard ratio, 3.67).

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of the Swedish National Patient Register, we found that the risk for rectal cancer after colectomy in patients with UC is low, in relative and absolute terms, after reconstruction with an IPAA. An IRA and diverted rectum are associated with an increased risk of rectal cancer, compared with the general population, but the absolute risk is low. Patients and their health care providers should consider these findings in making decisions to leave the rectum intact, perform completion proctectomy, or reconstruct the colon with an IRA or IPAA.

Controversies in J Pouch Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis: A Focus on Handsewn Versus Stapled Anastomosis

The accepted current standard for treatment of medically refractory ulcerative colitis is total proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for restoration of continence. There are 2 techniques by which the anastomosis can be performed, including handsewn and stapled. Handsewn anastomosis with mucosectomy was the first method described; however, it has been associated with significant incontinence. The double-stapled anastomosis was developed in response to improve postoperative function. Controversy remains as to which technique is superior as both have disadvantages. This review article addresses differences between the 2 methodologies in relation to postoperative complications, anorectal physiology, functional outcomes, and oncological safety.

Adenocarcinoma of the ileal pouch mucosa: case report and literature review

PURPOSE

Cancers developing near the site of the ileoanal pouch anastomosis (IPAA) have been reported, but uncommonly in the ileal pouch mucosa itself. We present a recently encountered case of ileal pouch cancer and review the literature to examine the prevalence, risk factors, and natural history of ileal pouch adenocarcinoma as well as pouch surveillance.

METHODS

A chart review of the case from our institution was conducted, and a PubMed search was undertaken for articles describing adenocarcinoma arising from the ileal pouch mucosa.

RESULTS

Twenty articles containing 26 cases were reviewed in addition to our described case. More than half were reported in the last decade. Only three cases were definitively stage 1. All seven patients who underwent regular surveillance were diagnosed with stage 1 or 2 disease. Seventeen patients had neoplasia in their original proctocolectomy specimen and six did not. The mean time from pouch creation to adenocarcinoma was 8.9 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of developing ileal pouch mucosa adenocarcinoma appears low. However, increasing reports of these cancers are concerning as most patients present with advanced disease after many years. Patients with a previous history of dysplasia/cancer may be at increased risk. We believe surveillance after IPAA should include the anal transition zone and the ileal pouch mucosa. The establishment of expert consensus guidelines on pouch surveillance should be considered in the near future.

Disease course and management strategy of pouch neoplasia in patients with underlying inflammatory bowel diseases

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the disease course and management strategy for pouch neoplasia.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ileal pouch surgery for underlying ulcerative colitis who developed low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia, or adenocarcinoma in the pouch were identified.

RESULTS

All eligible 44 patients were evaluated. Of the 22 patients with initial diagnosis of pouch LGD, 6 (27.3%) had persistence or progression after a median follow-up of 9.5 (4.1-17.6) years. Family history of colorectal cancer was shown to be a risk factor associated with persistence or progression of LGD (P = 0.03). Of the 12 patients with pouch high-grade dysplasia, 5 (41.7%) had a history of (n = 2, 16.7%) or synchronous (n = 4, 33.3%) pouch LGD. Pouch high-grade dysplasia either persisted or progressed in 3 patients (25.0%) after the initial management, during a median time interval of 5.4 (2.2-9.2) years. Of the 14 patients with pouch adenocarcinoma, 12 (85.7%) had a history of (n = 2, 14.3%) or synchronous dysplasia (n = 12, 85.7%). After a median follow-up of 2.1 (0.6-5.2) years, 6 patients with pouch cancer (42.9%) died. Comparison of patients with a final diagnosis of pouch adenocarcinoma (14, 32.6%), and those with dysplasia (29, 67.4%) showed that patients with adenocarcinoma were older (P = 0.04) and had a longer duration from IBD diagnosis or pouch construction to the detection of pouch neoplasia (P = 0.007 and P = 0.0013).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk for progression of pouch dysplasia can be stratified. The presence of family history of colorectal cancer seemed to increase the risk for persistence or progression for patients with pouch LGD. The prognosis for pouch adenocarcinoma was poor.

Twenty-year-old stapled pouches for ulcerative colitis without evidence of rectal cancer: implications for surveillance strategy?

BACKGROUND

The risk of anal transition zone dysplasia/cancer after stapled IPAA for ulcerative colitis might be cumulative over time.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this work was to assess the long-term incidence and risk factors of anal transition zone dysplasia.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Participants included those in our surveillance program of serial anal transition zone biopsies after stapled IPAA from 1986 to 1992.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Anal transition zone dysplasia was the main measured outcome.

RESULTS

Of 532 patients, 285 had 2 or more anal transition zone surveillance biopsies, including 73 with ≥20 years of regular follow-up. No adenocarcinoma was detected, and 15 patients died of unrelated causes after a median follow-up of 13.4 years (range, 2.9-19.5 years) without dysplasia. The estimated survival rates at 10, 15, and 20 years were 99.6% (95% CI, 96.9-99.9), 98.9% (95% CI, 95.7-99.7), and 92.6% (95% CI, 86.5-96.0). The estimated rates of anal transition zone dysplasia based on the 9 patients were 2.9% (95% CI, 1.5-5.7) and 3.4% (95% CI, 1.8-6.4) at 10 and 15 years. No new-onset dysplasia was identified beyond 125 months. Postoperative anal transition zone dysplasia was significantly associated with both preoperative and pathology findings of colorectal dysplasia (p < 0.001 for each) or cancer (p = 0.025 and p <0.001) and was managed expectantly or with mucosectomy (5 and 4 patients), depending on the number of positive biopsies and degree of dysplasia. Continued surveillance after detection of anal transition zone dysplasia showed no evidence of recurrent dysplasia during a median follow-up of 125 months (range, 9-256 months).

LIMITATIONS

Approximately half of the eligible patients were excluded from the analysis because of insufficient follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow-up data corroborate the use of stapled IPAA for ulcerative colitis. Future studies should assess whether a less intensive surveillance strategy is safe 10 years after surgery.

Systematic review of cuff and pouch cancer in patients with ileal pelvic pouch for ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the procedure of choice for refractory or complicated ulcerative colitis (UC). Since 1990, pouch-related adenocarcinomas have been described. The aim of this study was to review the literature to evaluate the burden of this complication, seeking for risk factors, prevention, and ideal management.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify all described pouch-related adenocarcinoma in patients operated on with IPAA for UC. Studies were thoroughly evaluated to select authentic de novo pouch carcinomas. Some authors were contacted for additional information. Data of patients were pooled. Meta-analyses of suitable studies were attempted to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

Thirty-four articles reported on 49 patients (2:1, male:female) who developed unequivocal pouch-related adenocarcinoma, 14 (28.6%) and 33 (67.3%) arising from the pouch and anorectal mucosa, respectively. Origin was not reported in 2 (4%). Pooled cumulative incidence of pouch-related adenocarcinoma was 0.33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.34) 50 years after the diagnosis and 0.35% (95% CI, 0.34-0.36) 20 years after IPAA. Primary pouch cancer incidence was below 0.02% 20 years after IPAA. Neoplasia on colectomy specimen was the strongest risk factor (odds ratio, 8.8; 95% CI, 4.61-16.80). Mucosectomy did not abolish the risk of subsequent cancer but avoiding it increased 8 times the risk of cancer arising from the residual anorectal mucosa (odds ratio, 8; 95% CI, 1.3-48.7; P = 0.02). Surveillance is currently performed yearly starting 10 years since diagnosis, but cancers escaping this pathway are reported. In patients receiving mucosectomy, a 5-year delay for surveillance could be proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

Pouch-related adenocarcinomas are rare. Diagnosis of Crohn's disease in the long term may further decrease the rates in UC. Presumed evolution from dysplasia might offer a time window for cancer prevention. Abdominoperineal excision should be recommended for pouch-related adenocarcinomas.

Evaluating pouch problems

IPAA is a technically demanding procedure that requires appropriate skills and expertise. Adverse sequelae of IPAA are common. Accurate diagnosis and classification of pouch disorders and associated complications are important for proper management and prognosis. Based on presenting symptoms, appropriate and combined diagnostic modalities should apply. A multidisciplinary approach involving gastroenterologists, colorectal surgeons, gastrointestinal pathologists, and gastrointestinal radiologists is advocated for diagnosis and treatment of pouch disorders.

The clinical impact of primary sclerosing cholangitis in patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the liver, is associated with ulcerative colitis (UC) in up to 75% of Northern European patients. These patients are at increased risk for the development of colorectal cancer, and the operation of choice is restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. However, complications such as pouchitis can occur, and studies have suggested that PSC is an independent risk factor for the development of pouchitis.

AIM

The aim of this study is to review and discuss the available literature on the effect of PSC on clinical outcomes of patients who undergo pouch surgery for UC. The outcomes reviewed comprise the incidence of pouchitis and pouch dysplasia/cancer and quality of life, including sexual function in UC patients with or without PSC.

METHODS

Pubmed/Medline and Embase searches were undertaken to obtain papers in English between 1966 and 2008. The keywords used were primary sclerosing cholangitis, ulcerative colitis, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, quality of life, sexual function, dysplasia or cancer, pouchitis and orthotopic liver transplantation.

RESULTS

The incidence of pouchitis, pouch mucosal atrophy and risk of dysplasia appear to be greater in patients with associated PSC than in UC patients without PSC. Quality of life does not appear to be worse than in patients without PSC. Sexual function has not been studied in this subgroup of patients.

CONCLUSION

Pouchitis appears to be more common in the subset of UC patients with PSC, although there is clearly a need for further well-designed studies.

Inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer: proctocolectomy and mucosectomy do not necessarily eliminate pouch-related cancer incidences

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC), the most lethal long-term complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is the culmination of a complex sequence of molecular and histologic derangements of the colon epithelium that are initiated and at least partially sustained by prolonged chronic inflammation. Dysplasia, the earliest histologic manifestation of this process, plays an important role in cancer prevention by providing the first clinical alert that this sequence is under way and by serving as an endpoint in colonoscopic surveillance of patients at high risk for CRC. Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) is indicated for patients with IBD, specifically for ulcerative colitis that is refractory to medical treatment, emergency conditions, and/or in case of neoplastic transformation. Even after RPC with mucosectomy, pouch-related carcinomas have recently been reported with increasing frequency since the first report in 1984. We review IBD-associated CRC and pouch-related neoplasia prevalence, adverse events, risk factors, and surveillances.

METHODS

Literature of IBD-associated CRC patients and those undergoing RPC surgeries through 2010 were prospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

We found 12 studies from retrospective series and 15 case reports. To date, there are 43 reported cases of pouch-related cancers. Thirty-two patients had cancer in the anal transit zone (ATZ); of these, 28 patients had mucosectomy. Eleven patients had cancer found in the pouch body.

CONCLUSION

RPC with mucosectomy does not necessarily eliminate risks. There is little evidence to support routine surveillance of pouch mucosa and the ATZ except for patients associated with histological type C changes, sclerosing cholangitis, and unremitting pouchitis.

Pouch-related dysplasia and adenocarcinoma following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) is the criterion standard surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). Restorative proctocolectomy is indicated for UC that is refractory to medical treatment, for emergency conditions, and in case of neoplastic transformation. The procedure substantially reduces the risk of UC-associated dysplasia/neoplasia. However, after RPC surgery, even with mucosectomy, cancers of the pouch and/or the anal-transitional zone (ATZ) have been reported with increasing frequency since the first report in 1984. This review highlights pouch-related dysplastic and neoplastic transformation, prevalence and adverse events, risk factors and surveillance following surgery for UC.

METHODS

Reports in the literature about patients undergoing pouch surgery from different institutions reported through May 2010 were reviewed to identify patients who developed these complications, and an attempt was made to develop a rational follow-up policy based on the data available.

RESULTS

To date, there are 43 reported cancers of the pouch or inlet after RPC for UC: 16 from retrospective series, 1 from a prospective study, and 26 in case reports. Thirty patients underwent mucosectomy and 13 had stapled anastomoses. To date, the number of 28 patients has been diagnosed with dysplasia after RPC for UC. Mucosectomy was performed in 27 of them and in 1 a stapled anastomosis was constructed without mucosectomy. In all cases reviewed, the time interval from the onset of UC to dysplasia/neoplasia was over 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Neoplastic lesions occurring in UC patients after RPC have been shown to be absolutely inevitable. Even mucosectomy does not completely eliminate the risk. There is little evidence to support routine biopsy of the ileal mucosa or the anal-transition zone except in patients with histological type C changes, sclerosing cholangitis, and unremitting pouchitis in the ileal mucosa. Such patients should be selected for endoscopic surveillance to detect dysplasia preceding pouch adenocarcinoma.

Diagnosis and management of dysplasia and cancer of the ileal pouch in patients with underlying inflammatory bowel disease

Approximately 30% of the patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) would ultimately require colectomy for medically refractory UC or UC-associated neoplasia. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has become the surgical treatment of choice for these patients. However, this procedure does not completely abolish the risk for neoplasia of the pouch. The main risk factor for pouch neoplasia is a preoperative diagnosis of UC-associated dysplasia or cancer. Although the natural history and prognosis of pouch dysplasia are not clear, mortality associated with pouch cancer, once diagnosed, appears to be high. Conversely, not all pouch neoplasia follows the chronic inflammation-dysplasia-cancer sequence, which makes pouch endoscopy with biopsy, the current gold standard for surveillance, challenging. In addition, the findings that pouch neoplasia is not common and that pouch endoscopy still misses dysplasia lead to controversy on the need and time interval of routine endoscopic surveillance. However, based on reports in the literature and their own experience, the authors recommend surveillance endoscopy to be performed in patients at risk, such as those with a precolectomy diagnosis of UC-associated neoplasia. This review appraises issues in the prevalence and incidence, risk factors, technical aspects of pouch construction, clinical and pathological features, natural history, surveillance examination, diagnosis, and management of pouch neoplasia.

Preoperative colorectal neoplasia increases risk for pouch neoplasia in patients with restorative proctocolectomy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has substantially reduced the risk for ulcerative colitis (UC)-associated dysplasia or cancer (neoplasia). We characterized features, risk factors, and outcomes of pouch neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in a historical cohort study.

METHODS

A total of 3203 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease underwent restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA from 1984 to 2009 at the Cleveland Clinic. Demographic, clinical, and endoscopic data were reviewed and samples were examined by histological analyses. Univariable and Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Cumulative incidences for pouch neoplasia at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years were 0.9%, 1.3%, 1.9%, 4.2%, and 5.1%, respectively. Thirty-eight patients (1.19%) had pouch neoplasia, including 11 (0.36%) with adenocarcinoma of the pouch and/or the anal-transitional zone (ATZ), 1 (0.03%) with pouch lymphoma, 3 with squamous cell cancer of the ATZ, and 23 with dysplasia (0.72%). In the Cox model, the risk factor associated with pouch neoplasia was a preoperative diagnosis of UC-associated cancer or dysplasia, with adjusted hazard ratios of 13.43 (95% confidence interval: 3.96-45.53; P < .001) and 3.62 (95% confidence interval: 1.59-8.23; P = .002), respectively. Mucosectomy did not protect against pouch neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk for neoplasia in patients with UC and IPAA is small and not eliminated by colectomy or mucosectomy. A preoperative diagnosis of dysplasia or cancer of colon or rectum is a risk factor for pouch dysplasia or adenocarcinoma.

Is stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis a safe option in ulcerative colitis patients with dysplasia or cancer?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the oncological and clinical outcome of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with coexisting colorectal cancer/dysplasia following stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred eighty-five UC patients who underwent stapled IPAA were followed prospectively in a comprehensive pouch clinic. They were divided into three groups: colorectal cancer, dysplasia, and no cancer/dysplasia. Demographic parameters, clinical data, and oncological and functional outcome of the three groups were compared.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients had cancer and 14 had dysplasia. Two of the three cancer patients who developed metastatic disease died. One patient who had rectal cancer was found to have cancer cells in the rectal cuff 10 years after IPAA. All other cancer/dysplasia patients were disease-free at 62 months (median). The 5-year survival rate was 87.5% for the cancer group and 100% for the others (p < 0.0001). Chemotherapy (nine patients) did not affect pouch function. Two rectal cancer patients who received radiotherapy did not maintain a functioning pouch. Overall pouch failure rates were 19%, 7%, and 6% for cancer, dysplasia, and no-cancer/dysplasia patients, respectively (p = 0.13). The mean frequency of bowel movements in 24 h was similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Stapled IPAA is a reasonable option for UC patients with cancer/dysplasia. Chemotherapy is safe, but the effect of radiation on pouch outcome is worrisome. Close long-term follow-up for UC patients with cancer/dysplasia is recommended for early detection of possible recurrence.

Adenocarcinoma complicating restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis with mucosectomy performed by Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator

This is a report of adenocarcinoma arising in an ileal pouch after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with rectal mucosal stripping performed by Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) for ulcerative colitis. The CUSA was introduced to simplify and optimize ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with mucosectomy and has been shown to shorten the operative time and reduce blood loss. Its use however, may increase the number of pathology specimens made uninterpretable on account of tissue ablation. In the present case, even though preoperative colonoscopy had clearly shown dysplasia, the surgical pathology report could not detect any neoplasia in the specimen; hence, the patient was not surveyed for pouch cancer. Six years later, the patient presented with intestinal obstruction caused by cancer. While protocols for universal pouch surveillance remain somewhat controversial, we conclude on the basis of this case and a review of the literature that in RPC with mucosectomy performed by CUSA, pouch cancer surveillance is particularly important because remnants of rectal epithelium may have been left behind and tissue ablation may have made the surgical pathology report uninterpretable.

Anal transition zone in the surgical management of ulcerative colitis

Preservation of the anal transition zone has long been a significant source of controversy in the surgical management of ulcerative colitis. The two techniques for restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis (RPC IPAA) in common practice are a stapled anastomosis and a handsewn anastomosis; these techniques differ in the amount of remaining rectal mucosa and therefore the presence of the anal transition zone following surgery. Each technique has advantages and disadvantages in long-term functional outcomes, operative and postoperative complications, and risk of neoplasia. Therefore, we propose a selective approach to performing a stapled RPC IPAA based on the presence of dysplasia in the preoperative endoscopic evaluation.

Adenocarcinoma following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: review of 26 cases

The occurrence of adenocarcinoma following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) is an infrequent and but potentially lethal complication. We have seen 1 such case among 520 IPAAs performed in our group practice between 1978 and February 2008. We have added this case to a review of 25 previously reported cases of adenocarcinoma of the pouch or outflow tract following IPAA for UC. Our conclusions are 1) that post-IPAA cancer can occur following either mucosectomy or stapled anastomosis; 2) that this malignancy can occur after IPAA performed for UC either with or without neoplasia; and 3) that this complication is seen whether or not the initial cancer or dysplasia had involved the rectum.

Adenocarcinoma arising from the rectal stump eleven years after excision of an ileal J-pouch in a patient with ulcerative colitis: report of a case

Adenocarcinomas in relation to the ileal J-pouch after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis have been recently reported with increasing frequency. All previously reported cases have occurred in patients with their ileal pouch in situ. We report a case of adenocarcinoma in the anal canal 11 years after removal of a failed ileal J-pouch. Mucosectomy had been performed at the restorative proctocolectomy. The anus had been left in place at the pouch excision because of severe fibrosis in the pelvis. If it is decided to remove an ileal pouch permanently, a total abdominoperineal excision should be performed, particularly in patients with risk factors for cancer development.

Assessment of the mucosa of the indefinitely diverted ileo-anal pouch

OBJECTIVE

One surgical option to treat failure after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) is indefinite diversion (ID) without excision of the pouch. The study aimed to assess the mucosal morphology of the pouch and ileoanal anastomosis (IAA) over time after ID with particular reference to inflammation, dysplasia and carcinoma.

METHOD

Patients with ID were identified from the hospital's Ileal Pouch Database. Individuals were invited by mail to attend for flexible pouchoscopy and biopsy from the ileal pouch and immediately distal to the IAA.

RESULTS

Of 1822 patients on the database, 28 had undergone ID. Of these, 20 patients (18 ulcerative colitis, one familial adenomatous polyposis, one pseudo-obstruction) of median age 42 (18-67) years took part. There were eight males. The median (range) intervals from diagnosis of primary disease, pouch surgery and ID to the time of study were 221 (63-410), 146 (31-314) and 44 (10-159) months respectively. One patient had dysplasia in the original resection specimen. Five patients developed type C changes in the pouch. Of these three were identified between RPC and ID, one developed between ID and the present assessment and one was identified for the first time at the present assessment. No case of dysplasia or cancer was found in any of the biopsies. Rectal mucosa was found in biopsies from the IAA in four patients (three stapled; one handsewn); this was inflamed in three patients.

CONCLUSION

At a median follow-up of 12 years after RPC and 3.6 years after indefinite diversion no instance of dysplasia or carcinoma in the ileal reservoir or distal to the IAA was found in any of the 20 patients having ID. Type C changes occurred at some time in five (25%) patients, indicating the importance of continued follow up.

Surgery for ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis is an inflammatory condition of unknown aetiology affecting all or part of the rectum and colon. The mainstay of treatment is medical but there are specific indications for surgical intervention. This article reviews the evolution of surgical management and in particular compares outcome from proctocolectomy and pouch surgery. A number of factors determining choice of procedure are examined, including elective or emergency presentation, patient selection, technical issues, morbidity and quality of life. Emphasis is made regarding a full explanation of these factors so that the patient is fully involved in the final decision regarding choice of procedure.

Perineal adenocarcinoma thirty years after proctocolectomy: report of a case

This report describes an adenocarcinoma arising in the perineum 30 years after two-stage total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. This is one of the longest intervals reported between resection and presentation with cancer and also the only case in which the tumor is clearly free of association with existing bowel. The mass originally presented as a perineal mucocele, an unusual complication of proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, and this is the first such mucocele to demonstrate malignant transformation.

Systematic review of dysplasia after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

Background

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the prevalence and site of dysplasia after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for ulcerative colitis (UC), and to identify risk factors that could be used in a surveillance programme.

Methods

Medical databases were searched for potentially relevant publications between 1978 and 2006. Studies that dealt with RPC for UC and postoperative surveillance were included. Two researchers independently performed study selection, quality assessment, data extraction and analysis.

Results

Twenty-three observational studies and case series were included, with a total of 2040 patients. The pooled prevalence of confirmed dysplasia in the pouch, anal transitional zone or rectal cuff was 1·13 (range 0–18·75) per cent. The prevalence of high-grade dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia and indefinite for dysplasia was 0·15 (range 0–4·49), 0·98 (range 0–15·62) and 1·23 (range 0–25·28 per cent) respectively. Dysplasia was equally frequent in the pouch and rectal cuff or anal transitional zone. Dysplasia and cancer identified before or at operation seemed to be significant predictors of the development of dysplasia. Pouchitis and duration of follow-up were not of predictive value.

Conclusion

Although based on low-level evidence from uncontrolled studies, the prevalence of dysplasia observed after RPC was remarkable. A surveillance programme that takes into account the risk factors found is therefore advocated.

Incidence of and risk factors for dysplasia in mucosectomy area in ulcerative colitis patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We evaluated the incidence of dysplasia in the mucosectomy area using resected specimens to determine preoperative risk factors for the occurrence of dysplasia in this area.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively studied a consecutive series of 137 patients, each of whom underwent a restorative proctocolectomy with a mucosectomy and hand-sewn ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis between January 2003 and December 2004. Sections from the anal transitional zone mucosa were taken from the dentate line to 2.5 cm above the resected line and stained with hematoxylin and eosin then characterized as indefinite for dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, and high-grade dysplasia based on the criteria of an international working group for rectal mucosal atypia.

RESULTS

Dysplasia of the mucosectomy area was present in six (4.4%) of the patients, including one with low-grade and five with high-grade dysplasia. A multivariate analysis showed relations between age at time of surgery (>or=40 years) and duration of disease (>or=10 years) with a risk for development of mucosectomy area dysplasia.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of dysplasia of the mucosectomy area was 4.4%, and preoperative risk factors were shown to be duration of disease and age at time of surgery.

Prophylactic surgery for patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis. Which option? Histopathological and clinical implications

Patients with longstanding chronic ulcerative proctocolitis are at risk to develop colorectal cancer Conflicting views as regards surveillance, the indications for surgery and type of preventive procedure exist. For permanent prevention of cancer development complete removal of all potential malignant colorectal mucosa has to be done. Panprocto-colectomy with a conventional ileostomy or continent ileostomy removing all colorectal mucosa should therefore eliminate further risks of colorectal cancer. Colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis is a controversial issue. While many surgeons today are reluctant to use the technique, emphasising the persistent cancer risk, others consider the operation a viable alternative when used on a selective basis. The long-term risk of cancer in the rectal stump is the main strong argument . In restorative proctocolectomy, i.e. proctocolectomy with construction of an ileopouch anal anastomosis residual rectal mucosa is left behind irrespective of technique used and is therefore at risk for cancer development. Quite a few cancers have been reported to occur in these patients but controversy exists as regards the origin of these tumours but the risk for cancer development is very low. Biopsies from ileal pouches demonstrate various histopathological changes from nearly normal mucosa, to inflammation and atrophy, inflammatory cell changes, dysplasia as well as development of carcinoma. Grading of type and atypia is a challenge to reproduce and requires the participation of experienced gastrointestinal histopathologists.

Risk of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE

Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with or without mucosectomy is the treatment of choice for most patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) requiring surgery. The ileal mucosa in the reservoir and the anorectal columnar epithelium below the ileo-anal anastomosis are at risk of neoplastic transformation.

METHOD

The literature has been reviewed to identify patients developing this complication and an attempt has been made to develop a rational follow-up policy based on the data available.

RESULTS

Dysplasia in the ileal reservoir is rare. It is associated with histological type C changes, sclerosing cholangitis and unremitting pouchitis in the ileal mucosa and to the presence of sclerosing cholangitis. Nine patients who have developed adenocarcinoma in the residual anorectal mucosa and seven in the reservoir have been reported in the literature. A further hitherto unreported patient treated by the authors brings the total to 17 patients. Twelve of these had histopathological data on either dysplasia or carcinoma in the original operative specimen. The time intervals from the onset of UC and from the RPC to the development of cancer were 120-528 (median 246) and 16-216 (median 60) months respectively. Cancer appeared to be related to the duration of disease rather than to the interval from RPC. In all the reported patients the interval from the onset of UC was 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Based on these data a surveillance programme should begin at 10 years from the onset of disease. Patients with dysplasia or carcinoma in the original specimen, those with type C ileal mucosal changes and patients with sclerosing cholangitis should be selected for surveillance. This will involve multiple biopsies of the ileal reservoir and the anorectal mucosa below the ileo-anal anastomosis.