Normal ranges for anorectal manometry and sensation in women of reproductive age

Establishing a peripartum perineal trauma clinic: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is not rare, and its consequences are multiple and potentially severe, especially for young women. Some dedicated perineal clinics have been established to improve the management of OASI. Despite their obvious importance, these specific clinics are underrepresented and underdeveloped. The objectives of this review are to explore various options for developing a peripartum perineal clinic and to compare the different practices regarding the mode of delivery for subsequent pregnancies after an OASI.

METHODS

This narrative review covers information from patients' questionnaires specific to anal incontinence, anal physiology assessment, pelvic floor and anal sphincter imaging, and the arguments for choosing the mode of delivery after an OASI.

RESULTS

This review highlights the extensive range of practices regarding the delivery mode after an OASI throughout national professional organizations and experienced perineal clinics.

CONCLUSION

This review summarizes the different choices in developing a perineal clinic to facilitate their development in promoting health care and education specific for peripartum women concerning the perineal consequences of delivery for obstetrician-gynaecologists, family doctors, and residents.

The London Classification: Improving Characterization and Classification of Anorectal Function with Anorectal Manometry

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Objective measurement of anorectal sensorimotor function is a requisite component in the clinical evaluation of patients with intractable symptoms of anorectal dysfunction. Regrettably, the utility of the most established and widely employed investigations for such measurement (anorectal manometry (ARM), rectal sensory testing and the balloon expulsion test) has been limited by wide variations in clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article summarizes the recently published International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) consensus and London Classification of anorectal disorders, together with relevant allied literature, to provide guidance on the indications for, equipment, protocol, measurement definitions and results interpretation for ARM, rectal sensory testing and the balloon expulsion test. The London Classification is a standardized method and nomenclature for description of alterations in anorectal motor and sensory function using office-based investigations, adoption of which should bring much needed harmonization of practice.

Improvement of Patient Satisfaction and Anorectal Manometry Parameters After Biofeedback Therapy in Patients with Different Types of Dyssynergic Defecation

Biofeedback is a well-known and effective treatment for patients with fecal evacuation disorder (FED). The main purpose of this study was to investigate the outcome and the effects of biofeedback therapy on physiological parameters as assessed by manometry in patients with FED. Data from 114 consecutive patients with FED who underwent biofeedback therapy in Sara Gastrointestinal clinic in Tehran, Iran during 2015-2018 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. All participants underwent a comprehensive evaluation of anorectal function that included anorectal manometry and a balloon expulsion test at the baseline and after biofeedback therapy. Maximum anal squeeze pressure and sustained anal squeeze pressure were improved up to 100% and 94.7% of normal values in the patients after biofeedback, respectively (P < 0.001). First rectal sensation, was significantly decreased (25 ± 18.5 vs. 15.5 ± 5.2) while the maximum tolerable volume was significantly increased (233.6 ± 89.7 vs. 182.4 ± 23.1) after biofeedback therapy (P < 0.001). Type I dyssynergia was the most common type, effecting 82 cases (71.9%) of our patients. Dyssynergia parameters were improved 50-80% in 34 (41.5%) and 10 (31.3%) type I and non-type I patients, respectively. Over 80% improvement of dyssynergia parameters occurred in 48 (58.5%) and 22 (68.8%) type I and non-type I patients, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant between the two groups (P = 0.3). In addition, the ability to reject the balloon was significantly better in post intervention measurements (P < 0.001). Biofeedback not only improves the symptoms in patients of FED but also reverses more than 80% the dyssynergic parameters of defecation. However, due to the general effectiveness of biofeedback treatment in different types of DD, there were no significant differences between their improvement scores.

The impact of mode of subsequent birth after obstetric anal sphincter injury on bowel function and related quality of life: a cohort study

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective was to assess the impact of mode of subsequent birth on bowel function and related quality of life (QoL) in pregnant women with previous obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI).

Methods

A prospective cohort study, designed, undertaken and reported using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement and checklist. All pregnant women with previous OASI recruited at a specialist antenatal OASI clinic in a tertiary hospital to discuss mode of subsequent birth, between 1 January 2014 and 31 October 2015. Women are counselled in line with local guidelines based on Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Green-top recommendations. In addition to routine endoanal ultrasound scan (EAUS), women recruited to the study were asked to complete the validated Manchester Health Questionnaire (MHQ) at both 34 weeks’ gestation and 6 months postnatally.

Results

Of the 175 study participants, 125 (71.4%) completed follow-up at 6 months. There was no significant change in frequency of bowel symptoms or QoL domain scores in women who had a subsequent vaginal birth compared with caesarean section. Multivariate analysis showed the odds of having poor “incontinence impact” (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.03–8.21) and “physical limitations” (OR 4.56, 95% CI 1.02–20.45) were significantly higher for women who had a subsequent caesarean section.

Conclusions

For women with previous OASI, a subsequent vaginal birth is suitable for those with no bowel symptoms and normal EAUS and caesarean section is reasonable for women who do not have normal bowel function and/or normal EAUS findings; however, for some of these women bowel symptoms and QoL may be worsened.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-020-04234-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

Effect of gender on the etiology of fecal incontinence: Retrospective analysis of a tertiary referral center in Turkey

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Anorectal diseases, including fecal incontinence, are prevalent and have an enormous impact on the quality of life. Therefore, investigating their etiological factors may help to reduce the incidence and/or the severity of the underlying diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Referral complaints (constipation, strained defecation, and incontinence) and medical and anorectal manometry records of 883 (562 female/321 male, ages 45.17±1.00 and 48.41±0.63 years, respectively) patients were evaluated retrospectively. Maximal resting pressure (MRP) and maximal squeeze pressure (MSP) measured by stationary pull-through technique, volume of rectoanal inhibitory reflex, and sensory threshold to rectal balloon distention (ST) were obtained by water perfusion system. Data were compared according to referral complaints, age, gender, parity, and underlying diseases.

RESULTS

Incontinence was the most frequent referral complaint in 61.2% of females and 67.6% of males. MRP and MSP were significantly lower in incontinent females than in the other groups. In incontinent males, MSP was lower than the strained defecation group, and ST was higher than the constipation group. Age was negatively correlated with MRP for both of the genders and in all groups. Obstetric trauma (85%) and number of parity (3.40±2.59) were significantly higher in incontinent females. Moreover, the most prevalent underlying disease was diabetes in incontinent females (13.7%) and neurological diseases, including traumas, in incontinent males (41.5%).

CONCLUSION

Increasing awareness of labor safety, controlling diabetes mellitus, and preventing obstetric traumas may reduce the prevalence of fecal incontinence.

Comparison of Anorectal Manometry Testing in Left Lateral and Lithotomy Positions

OBJECTIVES

Anorectal manometry (ARM) is typically performed in left lateral position, but many practitioners are more familiar with the lithotomy position. We aimed to evaluate agreement between ARM performed in left lateral and lithotomy positions and patient preference for testing position.

METHODS

We performed a prospective comparison study of left lateral versus lithotomy position for women undergoing ARM for the evaluation of fecal incontinence. Women were randomly assigned to undergo testing in either left lateral position first followed by lithotomy position, or vice versa. Women then completed a survey assessing preference of position. We performed Bland-Altman analysis to measure the level of agreement between anorectal measurements obtained in the 2 positions.

RESULTS

Twenty-one women were enrolled (mean age, 65 ± 2.2 years). We noted an acceptable level of agreement between anal pressure values obtained in left lateral versus lithotomy positions: anal resting pressure (mean difference, 0.9 mm Hg; 95% limits of agreement, 30.2 and -28.5) and anal squeeze pressure (mean difference, 1.8 mm Hg; 95% limits of agreement, 54.3 and -50.7). The level of agreement for sensory values was outside the predetermined clinical acceptability range. Most women (17/21 [81%]) reported a "good" or "very good" experience in both positions.

CONCLUSIONS

Anorectal manometry testing in the 2 positions can be used interchangeably for anal resting and squeeze pressures, but not for anorectal sensation. This modification can be introduced into clinical practice to accommodate the preference of women and practitioners who favor lithotomy position.

Methods of anorectal manometry vary widely in clinical practice: Results from an international survey

BACKGROUND

Ano-rectal manometry (ARM) is the most commonly performed investigation for assessment of anorectal dysfunction. Its use is supported by expert consensus documents and international guidelines. Variation in technology, data acquisition, and analysis affect results and clinical interpretation. This study examined variation in ARM between institutions to establish the status of current practice.

METHODS

A 50-item web-based questionnaire assessing analysis and interpretation of ARM was distributed by the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group via societies representing practitioners that perform ARM. Study methodology and performance characteristics between institutions were compared.

KEY RESULTS

One hundred and seven complete responses were included from 30 countries. Seventy-nine (74%) institutions performed at least two studies per week. Forty-nine centers (47%) applied conventional ARM (≤8 pressure sensors) and 57 (53%) high-resolution ARM (HR-ARM). Specialist centers were most likely to use HR-ARM compared to regional hospitals and office-based practice (63% vs 37%). Most conventional ARM systems used water-perfused technology (34/49); solid-state hardware was more frequently used in centers performing HR-ARM (44/57). All centers evaluated rest and squeeze. There was marked variation in the methods used to report results of maneuvers. No two centers had identical protocols for patient preparation, setup, study, and data interpretation, and no center fully complied with published guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

There is significant discrepancy in methods for data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of ARM. This is likely to impact clinical interpretation, transfer of data between institutions, and research collaboration. There is a need for expert international co-operation to standardize ARM.

Gender differences in chronic constipation on anorectal motility

BACKGROUND

The epidemiology of chronic constipation (CC) skews toward female predominance, yet men make up an important component of those suffering from CC. We sought to determine whether there are sex-specific differences in symptoms and physiologic parameters on anorectal manometry (ARM).

METHODS

We performed a case-control analysis of sequential men and age-matched women (2:1 ratio) presenting for ARM as part of the evaluation of CC. We collected physiologic parameters derived from 3D high-resolution ARM in addition to the ROME III constipation module and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20) questionnaires. We analyzed univariate, sex-specific differences in ARM physiologic parameters and PFDI-20 parameters and adjusted for putative confounders using multivariate logistic regression.

KEY RESULTS

Our study enrolled 80 men and 165 age-matched women. Men had a higher median sphincter resting pressure (81.2 vs 75.2 mm Hg, P=.01) and mean squeeze pressure (257.0 vs 170.5 mm Hg, P<.0001) than women. Although men reported significantly less severe straining and incomplete evacuation, they had greater mean rectoanal pressure differential (-106.7 vs -71.1 mm Hg, P<.0001), smaller mean defecation index (0.17 vs 0.27, P=.03) and higher volume threshold for urgency (115.2 v. 103.4 mL, P=.03). However, women were more likely to have abnormal balloon expulsion time (BET) than men (52.7% vs 35.0%, P=.01). After multivariate analysis, male gender was the only independent predictor of a normal BET (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27-0.86, P=.01).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Men and women with CC differ with regard to symptom severity and physiologic parameters derived from ARM suggesting differences in their pathophysiology.

Do pelvic floor muscle exercises reduce postpartum anal incontinence? A randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) for postpartum anal incontinence (AI).

DESIGN

A parallel two-armed randomised controlled trial stratified on obstetrical anal sphincter injury with primary sphincter repair and hospital affinity.

SETTING

Ano-rectal specialist out-patient clinics at two hospitals in Norway.

POPULATION

One hundred and nine postpartum women with AI at baseline.

METHODS

The intervention group received 6 months of individual physiotherapy-led PFME and the control group written information on PFME. Changes in St. Mark's scores and predictors of post-intervention AI were assessed by independent samples t-tests and multiple linear regression analyses, respectively. The study was not blind.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was change in AI symptoms on the St. Mark's score from baseline to post-intervention. Secondary outcome measures were manometry measures of anal sphincter length and strength, endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) defect score and voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the reduction of St. Mark's scores from baseline to post-intervention in favour of the PFME group (-2.1 versus -0.8 points, P = 0.040). No differences in secondary outcome measures were found between groups. Baseline St. Mark's, PFME group affinity and EAUS defect score predicted post-intervention St. Mark's score in the imputed intention-to-treat analyses. The analysis on un-imputed data showed that women performing weekly PFME improved their AI scores more than women in the control group did.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that individually adapted PFME reduces postpartum AI symptoms.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Performing regular pelvic floor muscle exercises may be an effective treatment for postpartum anal incontinence.

Anorectal manometric parameters are influenced by gender and age in subjects with normal bowel function

PURPOSE

Anorectal manometry provides objective information about anorectal function, but its results depend on the examiner's skill, the type of equipment, and subject characteristics like age or gender. This single institution, prospective study was performed to investigate the effect of gender and age on the results of anorectal manometry.

METHODS

All included subjects completed a questionnaire to assess their bowel function. The survey included 13 validated questions (eight on constipation and five on incontinence) and was used to exclude subjects with pathological constipation or incontinence. Subjects with normal bowel function underwent anorectal manometry to measure anal sphincter length (ASL), maximum resting pressure (MRP), and maximum squeeze pressure (MSP), and the results were compared by gender and age.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 154 participants (94 male and 60 female) was 59.1 years. ASL was greater in men (4.23 vs. 3.85 cm, p < 0.001). MRP was not significantly different according to gender (p = 0.93), but MSP was higher in men (190.18 vs. 116.49 mmHg, p < 0.001). ASL did not correlate with age (p = 0.707). MRP was inversely related to age in both men (R (2) = 0.152, p < 0.001) and women (R (2) = 0.282, p < 0.001), and MSP only in women (R (2) = 0.210, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Anorectal manometric parameters are influenced by gender and age. This should be taken into consideration when interpreting manometric readings in a clinical setting.

Traditional measures of normal anal sphincter function using high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) in 115 healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

High-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) is a relatively new method for collection and interpretation of data relevant to sphincteric function, and for the first time allows a global appreciation of the anorectum as a functional unit. Historically, traditional anal manometry has been plagued by lack of standardization and healthy volunteer data of variable quality. The aims of this study were: (i) to obtain normative data sets for traditional measures of anorectal function using HRAM in healthy subjects and; (ii) to qualitatively describe novel physiological phenomena, which may be of future relevance when this method is applied to patients.

METHODS

115 healthy subjects (96 female) underwent HRAM using a 10 channel, 12F solid-state catheter. Measurements were performed during rest, squeeze, cough, and simulated defecation (push). Data were displayed as color contour plots and analysed using a commercially available manometric system (Solar GI HRM v9.1, Medical Measurement Systems). Associations between age, gender and parity were subsequently explored.

KEY RESULTS

HRAM color contour plots provided clear delineation of the high-pressure zone within the anal canal and showed recruitment during maneuvers that altered intra-anal pressures. Automated analysis produced quantitative data, which have been presented on the basis of gender and parity due to the effect of these covariates on some sphincter functions. In line with traditional manometry, some age and gender differences were seen. Males had a greater functional anal canal length and anal pressures during the cough maneuver. Parity in females was associated with reduced squeeze increments.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The study provides a large healthy volunteer dataset and parameters of traditional measures of anorectal function. A number of novel phenomena are appreciated, the significance of which will require further analysis and comparisons with patient populations.

Anorectal physiology and testing

A good understanding of anorectal physiology is essential for the diagnosis and appropriate treatment of various anorectal disorders, such as fecal incontinence, constipation, and pain. This article reviews the physiology of the anorectum and details the various investigations used to diagnose anorectal physiology disorders. These anatomic and functional tests include anal manometry, endoanal ultrasound, defecography, balloon expulsion test, magnetic resonance imaging, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, electromyography, and colonic transit studies. Indications for investigations, steps in performing the tests, and interpretation of results are discussed.

Topographic and manometric characterization of the recto-anal inhibitory reflex

BACKGROUND

Recto-anal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) is an integral part of normal defecation. The physiologic characteristics of RAIR along anal length and anterior-posterior axis are unknown. The aim of this study was to perform topographic and vector-graphic evaluation of RAIR along anal canal using high definition manometry (HDM), and examine the role of various muscle components.

METHODS

Anorectal topography was assessed in 10 healthy volunteers using HDM probe with 256 sensors. Recto-anal inhibitory reflex data were analyzed every mm along the length of anal canal for topographic, baseline, residual, and plateau pressures during five mean volumes of balloon inflation (15 cc, 40 cc, 71 cc, 101 cc, 177 cc), and in 3D by dividing anal canal into 4 × 2.1 mm grids.

KEY RESULTS

Relaxation pressure progressively increases along anal canal with increasing balloon volume up to 71 cc and thereafter plateaus. In 3D, RAIR is maximally seen at the middle and upper portions of anal canal (levels 1.2-3.2 cm) and posteriorly. Peak residual pressure was seen at proximal anal canal.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Recto-anal inhibitory reflex is characterized by differential anal relaxation along anterior-posterior axis, longitudinally along the length of anal canal, and it depends on the rectal distention volume. It is maximally seen at internal anal sphincter pressure zone. Multidimensional analyses indicate that external anal sphincter provides bulk of anal residual pressure. Our findings emphasize importance of sensor location and orientation; as anterior and more distal location may miss RAIR.

Anal physiology testing in fecal incontinence: is it of any value?

INTRODUCTION

The prognostic value of postoperative manometry in fecal incontinence is still controversial. The aims of this study were to establish if Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) scores correlate with anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound findings and to define if there is any prognostic value in performing anal manometry after patients are surgically treated for fecal incontinence.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients, all women, were identified. All patients underwent a surgical procedure and were analyzed pre- and postoperatively. Fecal incontinence was assessed using the FISI and FIQL. Patients who did not have these score were excluded. Manometry and ultrasound findings before treatment and manometry findings after treatment were compared with surgical patient's incontinence scores. Anal canal length was noted, and its association with the pre- and postoperative manometry finding and incontinence scores were compared.

RESULTS

No correlation of pre- and postoperative resting and squeeze pressures with incontinence scores was found. Ultrasound findings had no correlation with manometry results and incontinence scores. Anal canal length correlated with both pre- and postoperative manometry findings but not with incontinence scores.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound help in guiding treatment options in patients with fecal incontinence. A decrease in FISI and increase in FIQL scores after a sphincter repair quantifies improvement after incontinence surgery, while changes in anal manometry pressures readings do not.

Manometric, sensorimotor, and neurophysiologic evaluation of anorectal function

With advances in diagnostic technology, it is now accepted that in the field of functional bowel disorders, symptom-based assessment is unsatisfactory as the sole means of directing therapy. A robust taxonomy based on underlying pathophysiology has been suggested, highlighting a crucial role for physiologic testing in clinical practice. A wide number of complementary investigations currently exist for the assessment of anorectal structure and function, some of which have a clinical impact in patients with functional disorders of evacuation and continence by markedly improving diagnostic yield and altering management. The techniques, limitations, measurements, and clinical use of manometric, sensorimotor, and neurophysiologic tests of anorectal function are presented.

Fecal incontinence: does age matter? Characteristics of older vs. younger women presenting for treatment of fecal incontinence

PURPOSE

The etiology of fecal incontinence is multifactorial. We hypothesize that women who seek treatment at different ages differ. We sought to determine which characteristics of women with fecal incontinence patients are associated with younger age at presentation.

METHODS

We reviewed a database of 399 women with complete fecal incontinence evaluations from 2001 to 2006, selecting patients who were aged 49 and younger or aged 65 years and older, for a total of 246 patients. Data were obtained from self-report questionnaires on fecal incontinence frequency and associated symptoms, medical history, and results of anorectal physiology tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The median ages of the two groups were 42 (range, 23-49) years and 72 (range, 65-89) years. Sphincter defects > 90 degrees and previous sphincteroplasty were associated with the younger age group. Previous hemorrhoid surgery and bilateral pudendal neuropathy were associated with the older age group. Younger women had more frequent incontinence to gas, mucus, and liquid stool.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, fecal incontinence-related symptoms and medical conditions differed in older and younger women presenting with this condition. Younger women may be more likely to seek treatment for any degree of symptoms. The differing characteristics of fecal incontinence by age should be considered when developing a treatment strategy.