Screen-detected colorectal cancers show improved cancer-specific survival when compared with cancers diagnosed via the 2-week suspected colorectal cancer referral guidelines

Race and Gender Differences in Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests and Guidelines Among Recently Diagnosed Colon Cancer Patients in an Urban Setting

The purpose of this study was to first characterize the prevalence of recall, recognition, and knowledge of colon cancer screening tests and guidelines (collectively, "awareness") among non-Hispanic black (NHB) and NH white (NHW) urban colon cancer patients. Second, we sought to examine whether awareness was associated with mode of cancer detection. Low awareness regarding colon cancer screening tests and guidelines may explain low screening rates and high prevalence of symptomatic detection. We examined recall, recognition, and knowledge of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests and guidelines and their associations with mode of cancer detection (symptomatic versus screen-detected) in 374 newly diagnosed NHB and NHW patients aged 45-79. Patients were asked to name or describe any test to screen for colon cancer (recall); next, they were given descriptions of stool testing and colonoscopy and asked if they recognized each test (recognition). Lastly, patients were asked if they knew the screening guidelines (knowledge). Overall, awareness of CRC screening guidelines was low; just 20% and 13% of patients knew colonoscopy and fecal test guidelines, respectively. Awareness of CRC screening tests and guidelines was especially low among NHB males, socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals, and those diagnosed at public healthcare facilities. Inability to name or recall a single test was associated with reduced screen-detected cancer compared with recall of at least one test (36% vs. 22%, p = 0.01). Low awareness of CRC screening tests is a risk factor for symptomatic detection of colon cancer.

Systematic review with meta-analysis of over 90 000 patients. Does fast-track review diagnose colorectal cancer earlier?

BACKGROUND

National UK data on colorectal cancer (CRC) stage at diagnosis is incomplete. Site-specific fast-track (2-week wait) cancer data are not collected directly by NHS England. Policy making based on these data alone can lead to inaccuracy.

AIMS

To review available data on key outcomes (cancer conversion rate and stage at diagnosis) for the UK's lower gastrointestinal 2-week wait pathway.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted between 2000 and 2017. Primary outcomes were cancer conversion rate and cancer stage at diagnosis. Results were expressed as proportions with 95% CIs. A random effects model was used for meta-analysis; heterogeneity was assessed by I² .

RESULTS

Of 95 papers reviewed, 49 were included in analysis with a total study population of 93,655. Cancer conversion rate was 7.7% (95% CI: 6.9-8.5). The proportion presenting at Dukes A = 11.2% (95% CI 7.4-15.6), B = 36.7% (95% CI 30.8-42.8), C = 35.7% (95% CI: 30.8-40.8) and D = 11.1% (95% CI 7.3-15.5). No colonic pathology was diagnosed in 54.6% (95% CI: 46.2-62.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 7.7% of patients referred by the 2-week wait pathway were found to have CRC. No beneficial effect on stage at diagnosis was found compared to non-2-week wait referral pathways. Over half of patients had no colonic pathology and detection of adenomas was very low. These results should prompt a reconsideration of the benefits of the 2-week wait pathway in CRC diagnosis and outcomes, with more focus on strategies to improve patient selection.

Survival of patients with symptom- and screening-detected colorectal cancer

Background

An increasing proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are diagnosed by screening rather than symptoms.

Aims

We aimed to assess and compare prognosis of patients with screen-detected CRC and symptom-detected CRC.

Methods

Overall and CRC specific mortality over a median follow-up of 4.8 years was assessed according to mode of diagnosis (symptoms, screening colonoscopy, fecal occult blood test [FOBT], other) in a multi-center cohort of 2,450 CRC patients aged 50-79 years recruited in Germany in 2003-2010.

Results

68%, 11% and 10% were detected by symptoms, screening colonoscopy and FOBT, respectively. The screen-detected cancers had a more favorable stage distribution than the symptom-detected cancers (68% versus 50% in stage I or II). Age- and sex adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of total mortality with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) compared to symptom-detected cancers were 0.35 (0.24-0.50) and 0.36 (0.25-0.53) for screening colonoscopy and FOBT detected CRCs, respectively. HRs were only slightly attenuated and remained highly significant after adjustment for stage and multiple other covariates (0.50 (0.34-0.73) and 0.54 (0.37-0.80), respectively). Even stronger associations were seen for CRC specific mortality. Patients with screen-detected stage III CRC had as good CRC specific survival as patients with symptom-detected stage I or II CRC.

Conclusions

Patients with screen-detected CRC have a very good prognosis far beyond the level explained by their more favorable stage distribution. Mode of detection is an important, easy-to-obtain proxy indicator for favorable diagnosis beyond earlier stage at diagnosis and as such may be useful for risk stratification in treatment decisions.

Population-based screening improves histopathological prognostic factors in colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) based on clinical symptoms is usually established in its advanced stages. One strategy for reducing mortality is the early detection and removal of preneoplastic and initial neoplastic lesions, even before the first symptoms appear, by means of population-based screening campaigns. The aim of the present study is to determine whether CRC diagnosed via a screening campaign has more favourable histopathological prognostic factors than when diagnosed in the symptomatic phase.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The prospective study of all the patients undergoing programmed CRC surgery at the JM Morales Meseguer Hospital (Spain) is between 2004 and 2010. The patients were divided into two groups: one diagnosed from clinical symptoms and one through a screening campaign. The following factors were compared: tumour size; degree of tumour invasion of the wall; lymph node, perineural and lymphovascular involvement; tumour stage; and grade of differentiation.

RESULTS

Compared to the symptomatic group, the screen-detected patients had smaller-sized tumours (lesions of less than 5 cm in 84 vs 69.55%, p < 0.001), a lower degree of colorectal wall invasion (T0-1 in 36 vs 9.02%, p < 0.001), less lymph node involvement (N0 in 72 vs 58.76%, p > 0.05), less vascular invasion (7.20 vs 15.22%, p = 0.79) and less perineural invasion (6.4 vs 20.70%, p < 0.001). The TNM staging in the screening group was lower than in the symptomatic group (stage 0-1 in 50.40 vs 18.58%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CRC diagnosed through a population-based screening programme presents more favourable histopathological characteristics than that diagnosed from the appearance of symptoms.

A comparison of tumour and host prognostic factors in screen-detected vs nonscreen-detected colorectal cancer: a contemporaneous study

AIM

In addition to TNM stage there are adverse tumour and host factors, such as venous invasion and the presence of an elevated systemic inflammatory response (SIR), that influence the outcome in colorectal cancer. The present study aimed to examine how these factors varied in screen-detected (SD) and nonscreen-detected (NSD) tumours.

METHOD

Prospectively maintained databases of the prevalence round of a biennial population faecal occult blood test screening programme and a regional cancer audit database were analysed. Interval cancers (INT) were defined as cancers identified within 2 years of a negative screening test.

RESULTS

Of the 395 097 people invited, 204 535 (52%) responded, 6159 (3%) tested positive and 421 (9%) had cancer detected. A further 708 NSD patients were identified [468 (65%) nonresponders, 182 (25%) INT cancers and 58 (10%) who did not attend or did not have cancer diagnosed at colonoscopy]. Comparing SD and NSD patients, SD patients were more likely to be male, and have a tumour with a lower TNM stage (both P < 0.05). On stage-by-stage analysis, SD patients had less evidence of an elevated SIR (P < 0.05). Both the presence of venous invasion (P = 0.761) and an elevated SIR (P = 0.059) were similar in those with INT cancers and in those that arose in nonresponders.

CONCLUSION

Independent of TNM stage, SD tumours have more favourable host prognostic factors than NSD tumours. There is no evidence that INT cancers are biologically more aggressive than those that develop in the rest of the population and are hence likely to be due to limitations of screening in its current format.

Increased survival and decreased recurrence in colorectal cancer patients diagnosed in a screening programme

INTRODUCTION

Population-based screening programmes for colorectal cancer (CRC) allow an early diagnosis, even before the onset of symptoms, but there are few studies and none in Spain on the influence they have on patient survival. The aim of the present study is to show that patients receiving surgery for CRC following diagnosis via a screening programme have a higher survival and disease-free survival rate than those diagnosed in the symptomatic stage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective study of all the patients undergoing programmed surgery for CRC at the JM Morales Meseguer Hospital in Murcia (Spain) between 2004 and 2010. The patients were divided into two groups: (a) those diagnosed through screening (125 cases); and (b) those diagnosed in the symptomatic stage (565 cases). Survival and disease-free survival were analysed and compared for both groups using the Mantel method.

RESULTS

The screen-detected CRC patients show a higher rate of survival (86.3% versus 72.1% at 5 years, p<0.05) and a lower rate of tumour recurrence (73.4% versus 88.3% at 5 years, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Population-based screening for CRC is an effective strategic measure for reducing mortality specific to this neoplasia.

Reducing the Social Gradient in Uptake of the NHS Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Using a Narrative-Based Information Leaflet: A Cluster-Randomised Trial

Objective. To test the effectiveness of adding a narrative leaflet to the current information material delivered by the NHS English colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme on reducing socioeconomic inequalities in uptake. Participants. 150,417 adults (59-74 years) routinely invited to complete the guaiac Faecal Occult Blood test (gFOBt) in March 2013. Design. A cluster randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN74121020) to compare uptake between two arms. The control arm received the standard NHS CRC screening information material (SI) and the intervention arm received the standard information plus a supplementary narrative leaflet, which had previously been shown to increase screening intentions (SI + N). Between group comparisons were made for uptake overall and across socioeconomic status (SES). Results. Uptake was 57.7% and did not differ significantly between the two trial arms (SI: 58.5%; SI + N: 56.7%; odds ratio = 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.81-1.06; p = 0.27). There was no interaction between group and SES quintile (p = 0.44). Conclusions. Adding a narrative leaflet to existing information materials does not reduce the SES gradient in uptake. Despite the benefits of using a pragmatic trial design, the need to add to, rather than replace, existing information may have limited the true value of an evidence-based intervention on behaviour.

Colorectal cancer screening characteristics of patients presenting with symptoms of colorectal cancer and effect on clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

National colorectal cancer screening, utilising a faecal occult blood test (FOBT), is now well established in the UK. The aim of this study was to define the screening characteristics of patients presenting to secondary care with symptoms of colorectal cancer and to assess the effect of screening outcome on subsequent symptomatic presentation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of all patients of screening age presenting within one calendar year in a tertiary trust via a two-week wait (2WW) pathway owing to suspicion of colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer related outcomes were compared between patients in the cohort who had previously accepted bowel cancer screening and patients who had previously declined bowel cancer screening. The primary endpoint was overall incidence of colorectal neoplasia. Secondary endpoints included incidence of colorectal malignancy, cancer related mortality, cancer related outcomes and polyp related outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 2,227 patients presented via the 2WW pathway; 955 were aged 60-75 years. Among the latter, 411 (43%) had been screened previously and had a negative FOBT, and 544 (57%) had declined screening. Incidence of colorectal neoplasia did not differ between the two groups (113 [27%] vs 143 [26%], p=0.7). Of those with a negative FOBT and subsequent symptomatic presentation, 16 (3.9%) were diagnosed with a colorectal malignancy compared with 36 (6.6%) of those who declined screening and had subsequent symptomatic presentation (relative risk: 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 0.96-3.02, p=0.08). There were no differences between the two groups with regard to TNM (tumour, lymph nodes, metastasis) stage, Dukes' stage, metastases, number of polyps or cancer related mortality (median follow-up duration: 20 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of colorectal neoplasia was similar among patients who previously had a negative FOBT and those who declined screening. There was a higher incidence of colorectal cancer detected among those who declined screening but it did not reach statistical significance. All other cancer and polyp outcomes were similar between the groups.

Prevalence of colonoscopy before age 50

OBJECTIVE

Describe the prevalence of colonoscopy before age 50, when guidelines recommend initiation of colorectal cancer screening for average risk individuals.

METHOD

We assembled administrative health records that captured receipt of colonoscopy between 40 and 49-years of age for a cohort of 204,758 50-year-old members of four US health plans and used backward recurrence time models to estimate trends in receipt of colonoscopy before age 50 and variation in early colonoscopy by age and sex. We also used self-reported receipt of colonoscopy from 27,157 40- to 49-year-old respondents to the 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to estimate the association between early colonoscopy and sex, race/ethnicity, and geographic location based on logistic regression models that accounted for the complex NHIS sampling design.

RESULTS

About 5% of the health plan cohort had a record of colonoscopy before age 50. Receipt of early colonoscopy increased significantly from 1999 to 2010 (test for linear trend, p<0.0001), was more likely among women than men (RR=1.9, 95% CI 1.14-1.24) and in the east coast health plan compared to west coast and Hawaii plans. The NHIS analysis found that early colonoscopy was more likely in Northeastern residents compared to residents in the West (odds ratio=1.75, 95% CI 1.28-2.39).

CONCLUSION

Colonoscopy before age 50 is increasingly common.

The 2-week wait service: a UK tertiary colorectal centre's experience in the early identification of colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines were introduced in the UK to ensure that patients with high-risk symptoms of colorectal cancer were reviewed promptly. We assessed the proportion of patients referred to our department's nurse-led 2-week wait (2WW) clinic with high-risk symptoms or signs that met these guidelines and the rate of colorectal cancer pickup.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained logbook of 2WW referrals over a 1-year period (1 January 2008-31 December 2008). Computerized notes were reviewed to obtain the following information: referral symptoms or signs and the proportion of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 720 patients were seen in the 2WW clinic over this period. Only 356/720 (49.4%) met the referral criteria. The overall pickup rate of colorectal cancer was 52/720 (7.2%) and was not found to be significantly higher in patients meeting guidelines compared with those who did not exhibit these features (7.6 vs. 6.9%; P=0.771). Over the 5-year follow-up period, no patients discharged from the 2WW pathway subsequently re-presented with colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

Over half of the referrals did not meet the NICE criteria, suggesting that the system is being used as a rapid access route to investigation. Despite this, there is no significant difference in the pickup rate of colorectal cancer in patients with or without high-risk features. Nurse-led 2WW clinics with subsequent investigation appear to be effective in both the identification and exclusion of colorectal cancer.

Disparities in survival improvement for metastatic colorectal cancer by race/ethnicity and age in the United States

PURPOSE

Previous studies documented significant increase in overall survival for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) since the late 1990s coinciding with the introduction and dissemination of new treatments. We examined whether this survival increase differed across major racial/ethnic populations and age groups.

METHODS

We identified patients diagnosed with primary metastatic colorectal cancer during 1992-2009 from 13 population-based cancer registries of the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, which cover about 14 % of the US population. The 5-year cause-specific survival rates were calculated using SEER*Stat software.

RESULTS

From 1992-1997 to 2004-2009, 5-year cause-specific survival rates increased significantly from 9.8 % (95 % CI 9.2-10.4) to 15.7 % (95 % CI 14.7-16.6) in non-Hispanic whites and from 11.4 % (95 % CI 9.4-13.6) to 17.7 % (95 % CI 15.1-20.5) in non-Hispanic Asians, but not in non-Hispanic blacks [from 8.6 % (95 % CI 7.2-10.1) to 9.8 % (95 % CI 8.1-11.8)] or Hispanics [from 14.0 % (95 % CI 11.8-16.3) to 16.4 % (95 % CI 14.0-19.0)]. By age group, survival rates increased significantly for the 20-64-year age group and 65 years or older age group in non-Hispanic whites, although the improvement in the older non-Hispanic whites was substantially smaller. Rates also increased in non-Hispanic Asians for the 20-64-year age group although marginally nonsignificant. In contrast, survival rates did not show significant increases in both younger and older age groups in non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics.

CONCLUSION

Non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and older patients diagnosed with metastatic CRC have not equally benefitted from the introduction and dissemination of new treatments.

Secular trends in colon and rectal cancer relative survival

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for colorectal cancer (CRC) have improved substantially over the past 25 years. Measuring the impact of these improvements on survival outcomes is challenging, however, against the background of overall survival gains from advancements in the prevention, screening, and treatment of other conditions. Relative survival is a metric that accounts for these concurrent changes, allowing assessment of changes in CRC survival. We describe stage- and location-specific trends in relative survival after CRC diagnosis.

METHODS

We analyzed survival outcomes for 233965 people in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program who were diagnosed with CRC between January 1, 1975, and December 31, 2003. All models were adjusted for sex, race (black vs white), age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, and diagnosis year. We estimated the proportional difference in survival for CRC patients compared with overall survival for age-, sex-, race-, and period-matched controls to account for concurrent changes in overall survival using two-sided Wald tests.

RESULTS

We found statistically significant reductions in excess hazard of mortality from CRC in 2003 relative to 1975, with excess hazard ratios ranging from 0.75 (stage IV colon cancer; P < .001) to 0.32 (stage I rectal cancer; P < .001), indicating improvements in relative survival for all stages and cancer locations. These improvements occurred in earlier years for patients diagnosed with stage I cancers, with smaller but continuing improvements for later-stage cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate a steady trend toward improved relative survival for CRC, indicating that treatment and surveillance improvements have had an impact at the population level.