A phase I/II dose-escalation study of exisulind and docetaxel in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Targeting cellular senescence as a therapeutic vulnerability in gastric cancer

AIMS

Cellular senescence (CS) represents an intracellular defense mechanism responding to stress signals and can be leveraged as a "vulnerability" in cancer treatment. This study aims to construct a CS atlas for gastric cancer (GC) and uncover potential therapeutics for GC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

38 senescence-associated regulators with prognostic significance in GC were obtained from the CellAge database to construct Gastric cancer-specific Senescence Score (GSS). Using eXtreme Sum algorism, GSS-based drug repositioning was conducted to identify drugs that could antagonize GSS in CMap database. In vitro experiments were conducted to test the effect of combination of palbociclib and exisulind in eliminating GC cells.

KEY FINDINGS

Patients with high GSS exhibited CS-related features, such as CS markers upregulation, adverse clinical outcomes and hypomethylation status. scRNA-seq data showed malignant cells with high GSS exhibited enhanced senescence state and more immunosuppressive signals such as PVR-CD96 compared with malignant cells with low GSS. In addition, the GSS-High cancer associated fibroblasts might secrete cytokines and chemokines such as IL-6, CXCL1, CXCL12, and CCL2 to from an immunosuppressive microenvironment, and GSS could serve as an indicator for immunotherapy resistance. Exisulind exhibited the greatest potential to reverse GSS. In vitro experiments demonstrated that exisulind could induce apoptosis and suppress the proliferation of palbociclib-induced senescent GC cells.

SIGNIFICANCE

Overall, GSS offers a framework for better understanding of correlation between senescence and GC, which might provide new insights into the development of novel therapeutics in GC.

Current Advances of Nitric Oxide in Cancer and Anticancer Therapeutics

Nitric oxide (NO) is a short-lived, ubiquitous signaling molecule that affects numerous critical functions in the body. There are markedly conflicting findings in the literature regarding the bimodal effects of NO in carcinogenesis and tumor progression, which has important consequences for treatment. Several preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that both pro- and antitumorigenic effects of NO depend on multiple aspects, including, but not limited to, tissue of generation, the level of production, the oxidative/reductive (redox) environment in which this radical is generated, the presence or absence of NO transduction elements, and the tumor microenvironment. Generally, there are four major categories of NO-based anticancer therapies: NO donors, phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE-i), soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) activators, and immunomodulators. Of these, NO donors are well studied, well characterized, and also the most promising. In this study, we review the current knowledge in this area, with an emphasis placed on the role of NO as an anticancer therapy and dysregulated molecular interactions during the evolution of cancer, highlighting the strategies that may aid in the targeting of cancer.

Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer (Hrpc): Present and Future Approaches of Therapy

The mainstay of therapy for patients with advanced prostate cancer still remains androgen deprivation, although response to this is invariably temporary. Most of the patients develop hormone-refractory disease resulting in progressive clinical deterioration and, ultimately, death. Until recently there has been no standard chemotherapeutic approach for hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), the major benefits of chemotherapy being only palliative. The studies combining mitoxantrone plus a corticosteroid demonstrated that chemotherapy could be given to men with symptomatic HRPC with minimal toxicity and a significant palliation could be provided. Recently, results from 2 phase III randomized clinical trials demonstrating that a combination of docetaxel plus prednisone can improve survival in men with HRPC have propelled docetaxel-based therapy into the forefront of treatment options for these patients as the new standard of care. There is a promising activity of new drug combinations such as taxanes plus vinca alkaloids; bisphosphonates are assuming a prominent role in prostate therapy through their ability to prevent skeletal morbidity. Combinations of classic chemotherapeutic agents and biological drugs began to be tested in phase II-III trials and the first results appear interesting. This article focuses on combinations recently evaluated or under clinical development for the treatment of HRPC.

Targeting androgen-independent pathways: new chances for patients with prostate cancer?

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the mainstay treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PC). Most patients eventually progress to a condition known as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), characterized by lack of response to ADT. Although new androgen receptor signaling (ARS) inhibitors and chemotherapeutic agents have been introduced to overcome resistance to ADT, many patients progress because of primary or acquired resistance to these agents. This comprehensive review aims at exploring the mechanisms of resistance and progression of PC, with specific focus on alterations which lead to the activation of androgen receptor (AR)-independent pathways of survival. Our work integrates available clinical and preclinical data on agents which target these pathways, assessing their potential clinical implication in specific settings of patients. Given the rising interest of the scientific community in cancer immunotherapy strategies, further attention is dedicated to the role of immune evasion in PC.

Exisulind in the treatment of prostate cancer

Prostate cancer represents the most common noncutaneous malignancy in men. With the widespread use of prostate-specific antigen screening, as many as one in six men in the USA will be diagnosed with prostate cancer. Significant healthcare resources are currently devoted to the treatment of this disease, specifically aimed at improving the side effects of successful treatment. Surgery or radiation therapy provides the best chance of cure from this disease. However, as many as 50% of patients treated with curative intent will develop a recurrence 10-15 years following treatment. Hormonal ablation via medical or surgical castration provides disease control, but is associated with significant hot flushes, loss of libido and impotence. Selective, apoptotic antineoplastic drugs, such as exisulind, may provide an alternative method to treating or preventing prostate cancer. This drug profile reviews the evidence for the use of exisulind in the treatment of prostate cancer.

cGMP-dependent protein kinase Iβ interacts with p44/WDR77 to regulate androgen receptor-driven gene expression

The androgen receptor (AR) pathway plays critical roles in controlling differentiation and proliferation of prostate epithelial cells. We previously identified a novel AR cofactor, p44/WDR77, which specifically enhances AR transcriptional activity in the prostate gland and prostate cancer. To further elucidate p44/WDR77's role in the AR signaling pathway, we conducted a yeast two-hybrid screening and identified cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) as a p44/WDR77-interacting protein. Further investigation by lusiferase assay and kinase assay demonstrated that PKG-Iβ physically interacted with and phosphorylated both p44 and AR and enhanced AR transactivity in synergy with p44 in an androgen- and cGMP-dependent manner. Furthermore, PKG1β expression promoted p44/WDR77 nuclear translocation and inhibited prostate cancer cell growth via G1 cell cycle arrest. Our findings characterize PKG as a novel regulator of AR-mediated transcription by enhancing AR cofactor p44/WDR77's function, which provide a novel mechanism for the growth regulation of prostate cancer cells by the androgen signaling.

A phase I study of OSI-461 in combination with mitoxantrone in patients with advanced solid tumors potentially responsive to mitoxantrone

Purpose

To find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of OSI-461 in combination with mitoxantrone in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods

This was a Phase I study using cohort dose escalation of OSI-461 dosed orally twice daily in combination with mitoxantrone 12 mg/m² given on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Results

OSI-461 dose was escalated to 1,000 mg po bid. One patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Three patients discontinued the study due to adverse events (AE). Two patients (10%) had a partial response, and ten patients (50%) had stable disease as best response.

Conclusion

The combination of OSI-461 and mitoxantrone was well tolerated. Dose escalation was stopped because of toxicities in a concurrent Phase I trial. The response rate seen in patients with prostate cancer was comparable to response rates seen in trials of mitoxantrone and prednisone alone, and further studies of the combination of OSI-461 and mitoxantrone were not pursued.

A dose-ranging study of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the selective apoptotic antineoplastic drug (SAAND), OSI-461, in patients with advanced cancer, in the fasted and fed state

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and determine the recommended dose of the selective apoptotic antineoplastic drug, OSI-461 administered on a twice-daily regimen to patients with advanced solid malignancies.

METHODS

In this phase I trial, 33 patients were treated with OSI-461 doses ranging from 400 to 1,200 mg given twice daily in 4-week cycles. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed to characterize the plasma disposition of OSI-461 and the effect of food intake on OSI-461 absorption. Secondary biomarker studies were performed to assess the biologic activity of OSI-461 including the measurement of pGSK-3beta, a PKG substrate, and pharmacogenetic studies to identify polymorphisms of CYP3A that influence drug metabolism and of ABCG2, involved in drug resistance.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were treated with 86 courses of OSI-461. The dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 abdominal pain, found in one patient at the 1,000 mg BID fed dose level and all patients at the 1,200 mg BID fed dose level. There was also one episode each of grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 constipation at the 1,000 and 1,200 mg BID fed dose levels, respectively. Other common toxicities included mild to moderate fatigue, nausea, anorexia and mild elevation in bilirubin. Pharmacokinetic studies of OSI-461 revealed approximately a twofold increase in AUC(0-24) when OSI-461 was administered with food. An increase in pGSK-3beta post-dose was seen in the majority of patients and was greater at higher dose levels. No patients exhibited CYP3A4 polymorphisms, while 100% of patients were found to have the CYP3A5*3/CYP3A5*3 polymorphism. Two known polymorphisms of the ABCG2 gene, G34 --> A34 and C421 --> A421, occurred at frequencies of 11.76 and 29%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Toxicity and pharmacodynamic data show that the recommended oral dose of OSI-461 is 800 mg twice daily administered with food. The drug appears to be well-tolerated, and overall bioavailability appears to be markedly increased when the drug is administered with food. These results support further disease-directed evaluations of OSI-461 at a dose of 800 mg BID in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents.

Effective chemotherapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC): Present status and perspectives with taxane-based treatments

Prostate cancer is a significant health concern for men worldwide. It continues to be the most common lethal malignancy diagnosed in American men and the second leading cause of male cancer mortality. Hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) remains clinically challenging. Two large phase III studies have demonstrated a survival advantage in HRPC patients utilizing docetaxel chemotherapy, setting a new standard of care for this disease. This paper examines the progress that has been made in HRPC with the Taxanes (Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, and Epothilones) with a glimpse on mechanisms of resistance and on combinations able to overcome it. In addition, new targeted therapies under development in combination with taxanes are reviewed with an explanation of their molecular mechanisms of action.

Phase II Evaluation of Docetaxel Plus Exisulind in Patients With Androgen Independent Prostate Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

In this phase II study, the combination of docetaxel and exisulind (a GMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor) was given to patients with metastatic androgen independent prostate cancer (AIPC) to establish efficacy, assess toxicity, and determine pharmacokinetics of docetaxel administered alone and in combination with exisulind.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with metastatic AIPC were registered to receive weekly docetaxel for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest; repeated up to a maximum of 6 cycles. Exisulind 250 mg was given orally twice a day starting on day 8 of the study and taken continuously.

RESULTS

All patients were evaluable for toxicity, response and survival. Grade 3 reversible toxicities included: fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, rash, syncope, pulmonary edema, deep vein thrombosis, congestive heart failure, and elevations in transaminases, requiring therapy delays and/or dose reductions, or removal from therapy. Only 3 out of 14 patients (21.4%) had a 50% decline in prostate specific antigen (PSA) level that lasted > or =4 weeks; 1 out of 14 patients (7%) had a lymph node response. Median survival was 17.28 months. Docetaxel pharmacokinetics for 11 patients demonstrated mean +/- SD clearance values that were similar during week 1 and week 3 when exisulind had been added.

CONCLUSIONS

: Overall, our trial indicated that the toxicity profile and efficacy of this regimen is unlikely to be substantially better than single agent docetaxel.

Pathogenesis and treatment of prostate cancer bone metastases: targeting the lethal phenotype

Traditionally, prostate cancer treatment, as well as all cancer treatment, has been designed to target the tumor cell directly via various hormonal and chemotherapeutic agents. Recently, the realization that cancer cells exist in complex microenvironments that are essential for the tumorigenic and metastatic potential of the cancer cells is starting the redefine the paradigm for cancer therapy. The propensity of prostate cancer cells to metastasize to bone is leading to the design of novel therapies targeting both the cancer cell as well as the bone microenvironment. Tumor cells in the bone interact with the extracellular matrix, stromal cells, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and endothelial cells to promote tumor-cell survival and proliferation leading to a lethal phenotype that includes increased morbidity and mortality for patients with advanced prostate cancer. Several strategies are being developed that target these complex tumor cell-microenvironment interactions and target the signal transduction pathways of other cells important to the development of metastases, including the osteoclasts, osteoblasts, and endothelial cells of the bone microenvironment. Current and new therapies in metastatic prostate cancer will comprise a multitargeted approach aimed at both the tumor cell and the tumor microenvironment. Here, we review the current therapeutic strategies for targeting the prostate cancer-bone microenvironment and several single- and multiagent targeted approaches to the treatment of advanced prostate cancer that are under development.