The significance of the expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in prostate cancer

Nucleobase and Nucleoside Analogues: Resistance and Re-Sensitisation at the Level of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Metabolism

Antimetabolites, in particular nucleobase and nucleoside analogues, are cytotoxic drugs that, starting from the small field of paediatric oncology, in combination with other chemotherapeutics, have revolutionised clinical oncology and transformed cancer into a curable disease. However, even though combination chemotherapy, together with radiation, surgery and immunotherapy, can nowadays cure almost all types of cancer, we still fail to achieve this for a substantial proportion of patients. The understanding of differences in metabolism, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tumour biology between patients that can be cured and patients that cannot, builds the scientific basis for rational therapy improvements. Here, we summarise current knowledge of how tumour-specific and patient-specific factors can dictate resistance to nucleobase/nucleoside analogues, and which strategies of re-sensitisation exist. We revisit well-established hurdles to treatment efficacy, like the blood-brain barrier and reduced deoxycytidine kinase activity, but will also discuss the role of novel resistance factors, such as SAMHD1. A comprehensive appreciation of the complex mechanisms that underpin the failure of chemotherapy will hopefully inform future strategies of personalised medicine.

Factors affecting the sensitivity of human-derived esophageal carcinoma cell lines to 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin

Effective chemotherapy against esophageal carcinoma is considered achievable with a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (CDDP). However, chemo-therapy remains ineffective in certain patients. The aim of this study was to clarify the factors which affect sensitivity to 5-FU and CDDP. The effects of factors known to influence sensitivity to 5-FU and CDDP, namely transporters, DNA repair enzymes and metabolic enzymes, were examined. mRNA levels of four transporters, SLC22A2, SLC23A2, ABCB1 and ABCC2, two DNA repair-related enzymes, Rad51 and MSH2, and one metabolic enzyme, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD), showed a strong correlation (|r|>0.7) with IC₅₀ values for 5-FU. In addition, the mRNA levels of ABCC2, MSH2 and DPYD showed a strong correlation (|r|>0.7) with the IC₅₀ values for CDDP. Gimeracil, a DPYD inhibitor, enhanced the sensitivity of some cells to 5-FU but decreased the sensitivity of all the cells to CDDP. The inhibitory effects of ABCC2 with MK571 did not correspond to those observed in the correlation analysis. In conclusion, mRNA levels of SLC22A2, SLC23A2, ABCB1, ABCC2, Rad51, MSH2 and DPYD were confirmed to be strongly correlated with IC50 values for 5-FU, and mRNA levels of ABCC2, MSH2 and DPYD were confirmed to be strongly correlated with IC₅₀ values for CDDP. In addition, the inhibition of DPYD appeared to affect the cytotoxicity of CDDP.

5-Fluorouracil pharmacogenomics: still rocking after all these years?

The 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) metabolic pathway is mainly dependent on the activity of several intracellular enzymes. Among them, four in particular; thymidylate synthase, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine phosphorylase are considered the key points in determining sensitivity or resistance to this drug. These enzymes are needed to metabolize the drug in its active form (thymidylate phosphorylase) or to drop the concentration of the active drug in the cell (dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase) or both (thymidylate synthase and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase). Several different studies have tried to investigate the relationship between the presence of mutations in these enzymes and a reduced/improved activity of treatment based on 5-FU or its derivatives. In this article, we will focus on the often contradictory results of these studies.

Drug metabolism by tumours: its nature, relevance and therapeutic implications

Drug-metabolising enzymes (DMEs) are present in tumours and are capable of biotransforming a variety of antineoplastics. Tumoural drug metabolism is both a potential mechanism of resistance and a means of achieving optimal therapy. This review addresses the classes of DMEs, their cytotoxic substrates and distribution in specific malignancies. The limitations of preclinical and clinical studies are highlighted. Their role in predicting therapeutic response, the activation of prodrugs and the potential for their modulation for gain is also addressed. The contribution of tumoural DMEs to cancer therapy can only be ascertained through large prospective studies and supported by new technologies. Only then can efforts be concentrated in the design of better prodrugs or combination therapy to optimise individual therapy.