Co-morbidity and the utilization of health care for Australian veterans with diabetes

Use of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents and Survival Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Dementia and Chronic Hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Many patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD) have chronic hepatitis C due to the high prevalence of both conditions among elderly populations. Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are effective in treating hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, the complexity of ADRD care may affect DAA use and outcomes among patients with HCV and ADRD. Little information exists on uptake of DAAs, factors associated with DAA use, and health benefits of DAAs among patients with HCV and ADRD.

OBJECTIVE

To examine use and survival benefits of DAAs in Medicare patients with HCV and ADRD.

METHODS

The study included Medicare patients with HCV between 2014 and 2017. We estimated Cox proportional hazards regressions to examine the association between having ADRD and DAA use, and the relation between DAA use and survival among patients with HCV and ADRD.

RESULTS

The adjusted hazard of initiating a DAA was 50% lower in patients with ADRD than those without ADRD (adjusted HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.46-0.54). The hazard of DAA use among ADRD patients with behavioral disturbances was 68% lower than non-ADRD patients (adjusted HR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.28-0.37). DAA treatment was associated with a significant reduction in mortality among ADRD patients (adjusted HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.44-0.61).

CONCLUSION

The rate of DAA treatment in patients with HCV and ADRD was low, particularly among those with behavioral disturbance. The survival benefits of DAA treatment for patients with ADRD were substantial.

Diabetes Care and Dementia Among Older Adults: A Nationwide 3-Year Longitudinal Study

OBJECTIVES

To compare diabetes monitoring and the incidence of acute diabetic complications between patients with and without incident Alzheimer's Disease and Related Syndromes (ADRS).

DESIGN

Longitudinal observational study from 2010 to 2014.

SETTING

Data from the French national health system database.

PARTICIPANTS

The France-Démence cohort: individuals aged 65 years or older suffering from incident ADRS, based on long-term disease registry, hospitalization for dementia, or antidementia drug delivery. They were matched (1:1) to a pair free of ADRS on age, sex, residence area, and insurance scheme. This study included France-Démence population with known diabetes for at least 2 years.

MEASUREMENTS

Data related to diabetes control and complications: biological monitoring such as glycated hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c, ≥1/y, ≥2/y), lipid profile, microalbuminuria; eye examination; hospitalization for diabetes-related complications such as coma with ketoacidosis; and hospitalization for hypoglycemia were studied between the year prior to ADRS identification (Y_-1) and the 2 following years (Y₀; Y₁). Incidences between the 2 groups (ADRS/non-ADRS) were compared using age-standardized incidence ratios (SIR).

RESULTS

The studied population included 87,816 individuals. HbA1c determination was less frequent in ADRS group, no matter the study period and the minimal annual threshold used. Respectively, 82.6% and 88.5% of ADRS and non-ADRS group had at least 1 HbA_1c testing during Y_-1 [SIR = 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-0.95], 73.4% and 89.0% during Y₀ (SIR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.82-0.84), and 75.4% and 89.3% during Y₁ (SIR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.83‒0.86). Subjects with ADRS were also consistently more hospitalized than non-ADRS peers. The gap was maximal in the year following the diagnosis, as observed for hospitalizations for any cause related to diabetes (SIR Y_-1: 2.04, Y₀: 3.14, Y₁: 1.67), diabetes mellitus with coma (SIR Y_-1: 3.84, Y₀: 9.30, Y₁: 3.06), and hypoglycemia (SIR Y_-1: 4.20, Y₀: 5.25, Y₁: 2.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Incident ADRS is associated with a less frequent diabetes monitoring and an increased risk of diabetes complications compared with older people without ADRS. Our study questions healthcare quality offered to participants with ADRS in comorbidity control. Further investigations are required to explain the mechanisms underlying our results and to propose actions to improve care of patients with ADRS.

Comorbidity and dementia: a mixed-method study on improving health care for people with dementia (CoDem)

Background

Among people living with dementia (PLWD) there is a high prevalence of comorbid medical conditions but little is known about the effects of comorbidity on processes and quality of care and patient needs or how services are adapting to address the particular needs of this population.

Objectives

To explore the impact of dementia on access to non-dementia services and identify ways of improving the integration of services for this population.

Design

We undertook a scoping review, cross-sectional analysis of a population cohort database, interviews with PLWD and comorbidity and their family carers and focus groups or interviews with health-care professionals (HCPs). We focused specifically on three conditions: diabetes, stroke and vision impairment (VI). The analysis was informed by theories of continuity of care and access to care.

Participants

The study included 28 community-dwelling PLWD with one of our target comorbidities, 33 family carers and 56 HCPs specialising in diabetes, stroke, VI or primary care.

Results

The scoping review (n = 76 studies or reports) found a lack of continuity in health-care systems for PLWD and comorbidity, with little integration or communication between different teams and specialities. PLWD had poorer access to services than those without dementia. Analysis of a population cohort database found that 17% of PLWD had diabetes, 18% had had a stroke and 17% had some form of VI. There has been an increase in the use of unpaid care for PLWD and comorbidity over the last decade. Our qualitative data supported the findings of the scoping review: communication was often poor, with an absence of a standardised approach to sharing information about a person’s dementia and how it might affect the management of other conditions. Although HCPs acknowledged the vital role that family carers play in managing health-care conditions of PLWD and facilitating continuity and access to care, this recognition did not translate into their routine involvement in appointments or decision-making about their family member. Although we found examples of good practice, these tended to be about the behaviour of individual practitioners rather than system-based approaches; current systems may unintentionally block access to care for PLWD. Pathways and guidelines for our three target conditions do not address the possibility of a dementia diagnosis or provide decision-making support for practitioners trying to weigh up the risks and benefits of treatment for PLWD.

Conclusions

Significant numbers of PLWD have comorbid conditions such as stroke, diabetes and VI. The presence of dementia complicates the delivery of health and social care and magnifies the difficulties that people with long-term conditions experience. Key elements of good care for PLWD and comorbidity include having the PLWD and family carer at the centre, flexibility around processes and good communication which ensures that all services are aware when someone has a diagnosis of dementia. The impact of a diagnosis of dementia on pre-existing conditions should be incorporated into guidelines and care planning. Future work needs to focus on the development and evaluation of interventions to improve continuity of care and access to services for PLWD with comorbidity.

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

Managing diabetes in people with dementia: protocol for a realist review

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, the prevalences of diabetes and dementia are both increasing, particularly in older people. Rates of diabetes in people with dementia are between 13 and 20 %. Diabetes management and diabetic self-care may be adversely affected by the presence of dementia. There is a need to know what interventions work best in the management of diabetes in people living with dementia (PLWD) in different settings and at different stages of the dementia trajectory. The overall aim is to develop an explanatory account or programme theory about 'what works' in the management of diabetes in people in what context and to identify promising interventions that merit further evaluation.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study uses a realist approach including studies on the management of diabetes in older people, medication management, diabetes-related self-care, workforce issues and assessment and treatment. We will use an iterative, stakeholder driven, four-stage approach. Phase 1: development of initial programme theory/ies through a first scoping of the literature and consultation with key stakeholder groups (user/patient representatives, dementia-care providers, clinicians, diabetes and dementia researchers and diabetes specialists). Phase 2: systematic searches of the evidence to test and develop the theories identified in phase 1. Phase 3: validation of programme theory/ies with a purposive sample of participants from phase 1. Phase 4: actionable recommendations for the management of diabetes in PLWD.

DISCUSSION

A realist synthesis of the evidence will provide a theoretical framework (i.e. an explanation of how interventions work, for whom, in what context and why) for practice and future research work that articulates the barriers and facilitators to effective management of diabetes in people with dementia. By providing possible explanations for the way in which interventions are thought to work and how change is achieved, it will demonstrate how to tailor an intervention to the setting and patient group. The propositions arising from the review will also inform the design of future intervention studies.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number CRD42015020625.

Utilisation of general practitioner services and achievement of guideline targets by people with diabetes who joined a peer-support program in Victoria, Australia

This paper describes the use of general practitioner (GP) services and achievement of guideline targets by 285 adults with type 2 diabetes in urban and regional areas of Victoria, Australia. Anthropometric and biomedical measures and responses to a self-administered questionnaire were collected. Findings indicate that almost all participants had visited a GP and had had their hypoglycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) measured in the past 6 months; less than one-third had visited a practice nurse. Fifty per cent achieved a HbA1c target of 7.0%; 40%, a total cholesterol ≤ 4.00 mmol/L; 39%, BP Systolic ≤ 130 mmHg; 51%, BP Diastolic ≤ 80 mmHg; 15%, body mass index ≤ 25 kg/m2; and 34% reported a moderately intense level of physical activity, that is, ≥ 30 min, 5 days a week. However, 39% of individuals achieved at least two targets and 18% achieved at least three of these guideline targets. Regional participants were more likely to report having a management plan and having visited a practice nurse, but they were less likely to have visited other health professionals. Therefore, a more sustained effort that also includes collaborative care approaches is required to improve the management of diabetes in Australia.

Comorbidity and dementia: a scoping review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that amongst people with dementia there is a high prevalence of comorbid medical conditions and related complaints. The presence of dementia may complicate clinical care for other conditions and undermine a patient's ability to manage a chronic condition. The aim of this study was to scope the extent, range and nature of research activity around dementia and comorbidity.

METHODS

We undertook a scoping review including all types of research relating to the prevalence of comorbidities in people with dementia; current systems, structures and other issues relating to service organisation and delivery; patient and carer experiences; and the experiences and attitudes of service providers. We searched AMED, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed, NHS Evidence, Scopus, Google Scholar (searched 2012, Pubmed updated 2013), checked reference lists and performed citation searches on PubMed and Google Scholar (ongoing to February 2014).

RESULTS

We included 54 primary studies, eight reviews and three guidelines. Much of the available literature relates to the prevalence of comorbidities in people with dementia or issues around quality of care. Less is known about service organisation and delivery or the views and experiences of people with dementia and their family carers. There is some evidence that people with dementia did not have the same access to treatment and monitoring for conditions such as visual impairment and diabetes as those with similar comorbidities but without dementia.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of comorbid conditions in people with dementia is high. Whilst current evidence suggests that people with dementia may have poorer access to services the reasons for this are not clear. There is a need for more research looking at the ways in which having dementia impacts on clinical care for other conditions and how the process of care and different services are adapting to the needs of people with dementia and comorbidity. People with dementia should be included in the debate about the management of comorbidities in older populations and there needs to be greater consideration given to including them in studies that focus on age-related healthcare issues.

Multidisciplinary collaboration in primary care: through the eyes of patients

Managing chronic illness is highly complex and the pathways to access health care for the patient are unpredictable and often unknown. While multidisciplinary care (MDC) arrangements are promoted in the Australian primary health care system, there is a paucity of research on multidisciplinary collaboration from patients' perspectives. This exploratory study is the first to gain an understanding of the experiences, perceptions, attitudes and potential role of people with chronic illness (asthma) on the delivery of MDC in the Australian primary health care setting. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with asthma patients from Sydney, Australia. Qualitative analysis of data indicates that patients are significant players in MDC and their perceptions of their chronic condition, perceived roles of health care professionals, and expectations of health care delivery, influence their participation and attitudes towards multidisciplinary services. Our research shows the challenges presented by patients in the delivery and establishment of multidisciplinary health care teams, and highlights the need to consider patients' perspectives in the development of MDC models in primary care.

Ageing well: improving the management of patients with multiple chronic health problems

AIM

To identify and evaluate the management and care of older people with multiple chronic health problems (MCHP).

METHODS

Administrative health data from the Department of Veterans' Affairs and bio-social data from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing are used to determine prevalence of MCHP, treatment patterns and patient outcomes. Focus groups and semistructured interviews are used to gain patient and health practitioner perspectives.

RESULTS

The prevalence of MCHP in older people is high (65%) and is associated with increased use of health services, mortality and poorer self-rated health. Australian disease-specific guidelines fail to address MCHP, and treatment conflicts with the potential to cause harm, were common.

CONCLUSION

Improvements in the care and management of older people with MCHP requires: a multifaceted approach, across the health-care system; better coordination of holistic, patient-centred multidisciplinary care; and effective communication and education of all stakeholders. The Health reform agenda in Australia provides an opportunity for change.

The association between co-morbidity and the use of antidiabetics or adjunctive cardiovascular medicines in Australian veterans with diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between co-morbidities and the use of antidiabetic medications or adjunctive cardiovascular medicines among Australian veterans with diabetes.

METHODS

data were sourced from the Australian Department of Veterans' Affairs Health Claims database. All veterans aged 65 years and over who were dispensed medicines for diabetes from July to December 2006 were included. Dispensings of antidiabetic and adjunctive cardiovascular medicines over the first six months of 2007 were examined. Log binominal regression models were used to calculate the relative risks of the dispensing of medications for various co-morbidities, taking into account potential confounders.

RESULTS

among the 14,802 veterans who were dispensed medicines for diabetes, 70% had five or more co-morbidities. Patients who had diabetes-related co-morbidities had significantly less dispensing of metformin monotherapy and more dispensing of insulin than those without these conditions. Patients who had cardiovascular disease were more likely to have three or more oral antidiabetics dispensed (RR=1.16, 95% CI: 1.04-1.30), particularly those who had heart failure (RR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.05-1.47). Patients with renal disease were more likely to have glitazones dispensed (RR=1.46, 95% CI: 1.24-1.72). Adjunctive cardiovascular medicines were significantly less likely to be dispensed to those with established heart conditions and non-related co-morbidities, particularly dementia.

CONCLUSIONS

consistent with guideline recommendations, in this cohort more intensive antidiabetic and cardiovascular therapy is used in those with more severe disease as measured by related co-morbidities. Cardiovascular medicines however may be underutilised in those with un-related co-morbidities.