Lack of interferon-beta bioactivity is associated with the occurrence of relapses in multiple sclerosis

MicroRNA-29b variants and MxA expression change during interferon beta therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by immune-mediated demyelination and axonal injury. Myelin-reactive IFN-γ-producing Th1 cells has been shown to play an important role in the development of MS. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a new class of small non-coding RNA molecules about 22 nucleotides long which regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally by binding to 3' UTR of their mRNA targets, and resulting in degradation or transcriptional repression of the targeted mRNA. Accumulating evidence supports that miRNA dysregulation is linked to the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases that include MS. miR-29b expression has been shown to be upregulated in memory CD4+T cells from relapsing-remitting MS (RR-MS) patients, which may reflect chronic Th1 inflammation. Interferon beta (IFN-β) benefits patients with MS and reduces symptoms of the RR-MS. MxA is induced by type I interferon and predicts IFN-β response in MS patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate miR-29b variants and MxA expression and serum IFN-γ level in responders and non-responders to IFN-β treatment.

METHODS

A total of 70 IFN-β treated RR-MS patients including 35 responders and 35 non-responders were enrolled. We analyzed the expression level of miR-29b variants and MxA using the peripheral blood of MS patients treated with IFN-β for more than one year. Real-time RT-PCR was performed to analyze miR-29b variants and MxA expression one year after initiation of IFN-β therapy. Serum cytokine level was measured by ELISA.

RESULTS

The results indicated that the expression level of miR-29b-3p changed related to IFN-β response. Moreover, miR-29b-5p was downregulated under IFN-β treatment in responders versus non-responders. MxA level was significantly decreased in the responders. There was no change in IFN-γ level following treatment with IFN-β in the MS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results might provide fundamentals for the development of new markers of the biological effects of IFN-β therapy.

Multiple Sclerosis: Immunopathology and Treatment Update

The treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has changed over the last 20 years. All immunotherapeutic drugs target relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) and it still remains a medical challenge in MS to develop a treatment for progressive forms. The most common injectable disease-modifying therapies in RRMS include β-interferons 1a or 1b and glatiramer acetate. However, one of the major challenges of injectable disease-modifying therapies has been poor treatment adherence with approximately 50% of patients discontinuing the therapy within the first year. Herein, we go back to the basics to understand the immunopathophysiology of MS to gain insights in the development of new improved drug treatments. We present current disease-modifying therapies (interferons, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, fingolimod, mitoxantrone), humanized monoclonal antibodies (natalizumab, ofatumumb, ocrelizumab, alentuzumab, daclizumab) and emerging immune modulating approaches (stem cells, DNA vaccines, nanoparticles, altered peptide ligands) for the treatment of MS.

MxA mRNA decrease preceding NAb detection in IFNβ-treated MS patients

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with interferon beta (IFNβ) are at risk of a declining response to treatment because of the production of IFNβ-neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). The expression of Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) mRNA is regarded as a marker of IFNβ bioactivity.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to analyze the kinetics of MxA mRNA expression during long-term IFNβ treatment and assess its relationship to NAb production.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, open-label, non-randomized study was designed in multiple sclerosis patients starting IFNβ treatment. NAbs and MxA mRNA were monitored every six months.

RESULTS

119 patients were consecutively enrolled and 107 were included in the final analysis. Both the presence of NAbs and a decrease in MxA mRNA below the cut off were revealed in 15 patients, however, in six patients (40%) positivity for NAbs was preceded by the decrease in MxA mRNA. In addition, a further six patients showing a decline in MxA mRNA did not have detectable NAbs.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that quantification of MxA mRNA is a more sensitive identifier of loss of IFNβ efficacy than the NAb positivity.

Myxovirus Resistance Protein A mRNA Expression Kinetics in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated with IFNβ

Introduction

Interferon-β (IFNß) is the first-line treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) is a marker of IFNß bioactivity, which may be reduced by neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against IFNß. The aim of the study was to analyze the kinetics of MxA mRNA expression during long-term IFNβ treatment and assess its predictive value.

Methods

A prospective, observational, open-label, non-randomized study was designed in multiple sclerosis patients starting IFNß treatment. MxA mRNA was assessed prior to initiation of IFNß therapy and every three months subsequently. NAbs were assessed every six months. Assessment of relapses was scheduled every three months during 24 months of follow up. The disease activity was correlated to the pretreatment baseline MxA mRNA value. In NAb negative patients, clinical status was correlated to MxA mRNA values.

Results

119 patients were consecutively enrolled and 107 were included in the final analysis. There was no correlation of MxA mRNA expression levels between baseline and month three. Using survival analysis, none of the selected baseline MxA mRNA cut off points allowed prediction of time to first relapse on the treatment. In NAb negative patients, mean MxA mRNA levels did not significantly differ in patients irrespective of relapse status.

Conclusion

Baseline MxA mRNA does not predict the response to IFNß treatment or the clinical status of the disease and the level of MxA mRNA does not correlate with disease activity in NAb negative patients.

Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis

Due to the heterogeneous nature of the disease, it is a challenge to capture disease activity of multiple sclerosis (MS) in a reliable and valid way. Therefore, it can be difficult to assess the true efficacy of interventions in clinical trials. In phase III trials in MS, the traditionally used primary clinical outcome measures are the Expanded Disability Status Scale and the relapse rate. Secondary outcome measures in these trials are the number or volume of T2 hyperintense lesions and gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. These secondary outcome measures are often primary outcome measures in phase II trials in MS. Despite several limitations, the traditional clinical measures are still the mainstay for assessing treatment efficacy. Newer and potentially valuable outcome measures increasingly used or explored in MS trials are, clinically, the MS Functional Composite and patient-reported outcome measures, and on MRI, brain atrophy and the formation of persisting black holes. Several limitations of these measures have been addressed and further improvements will probably be proposed. Major improvements are the coverage of additional functional domains such as cognitive functioning and assessment of the ability to carry out activities of daily living. The development of multidimensional measures is promising because these measures have the potential to cover the full extent of MS activity and progression. In this review, we provide an overview of the historical background and recent developments of outcome measures in MS trials. We discuss the advantages and limitations of various measures, including newer assessments such as optical coherence tomography, biomarkers in body fluids and the concept of 'no evidence of disease activity'.

Transcriptional response to interferon beta-1a treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Background

Interferon (IFN) beta-1a is an approved treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and has been examined for use in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). However, no information regarding blood transcriptional changes induced by IFN treatment in SPMS patients is available. Our aim was to identify a subgroup of SPMS patients presenting a gene expression signature similar to that of RRMS patients who are clinical responders to IFN treatment.

Methods

SPMS patients (n = 50, 20 IFN treated and 30 untreated) were classified using unsupervised hierarchical clustering according to IFN inducible gene expression profile identified in RRMS clinical responders to treatment. IFN inducible gene expression profile was determined by finding differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between IFN treated (n = 10) and untreated (n = 25) RRMS patients. Validation was performed on an additional independent group of 27 SPMS IFN treated patients by qRT-PCR.

Results

One hundred and four DEGs, enriched by IFN signaling pathway (p = 7.4E-08), were identified in IFN treated RRMS patients. Classification of SPMS patients based on these DEGs yielded two patient groups: (1) IFN transcriptional responders (n = 12, 60 % of SPMS treated patients) showing gene-expression profile similar to IFN treated RRMS patients; (2) IFN transcriptional non-responders (n = 8) showing expression profile similar to untreated patients. IFN transcriptional responders were characterized by a more active disease, as defined by higher EDSS progression and annual relapse rate.

Conclusion

Within the IFN treated SPMS population, 60 % of patients have a transcriptional response to IFN which is similar to that of RRMS patients who are IFN responders to treatment.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-015-0495-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Detection of anti-cytokine antibodies and their clinical relevance

Cytokines regulate many aspects of cell growth and differentiation and play pivotal roles in the orchestration of immune defence against invading pathogens. Though 'self' proteins, they are potentially immunogenic and can give rise to anti-cytokine autoantibodies (aCA). The main foci of the article are a critical summary of the various methodologies applied for detecting and measuring aCA and a broad review of studies of the occurrence, characterization and clinical relevance of aCA in normal healthy individuals, patients with autoimmune diseases or microbial infections and aCA in patients whose disease is treated with recombinant cytokine products. The need for technical and methodological improvement of assays, including validation and standardization, together with approaches to harmonize calculation and reporting of results is also discussed.

BAb and MxA as functional biomarkers in routine clinical laboratories for the determination of anti-IFN-beta antibodies and their bioactivity levels in multiple sclerosis patients

In MS patients under IFNβ treatment to seek alternative treatments timely is important that anti-IFNβ antibodies and/or in vivo biologic activity loss detection in these. The most common diagnostic markers used for this purpose are BAb, Nab, and MxA. In this article, we aimed to establish the availability and feasibility of the correlation between BAb and MxA gene expression (mRNA) levels using evaluation of responses to IFNβ treatment for MS patients with a routine laboratory follow-up strategy in a major Turkish MS center. Bab seropositivity was determined in blood samples of 218 MS patients treated with different IFNβ preparations and MxA mRNA levels were measured in 128 patients among the total population. BAb seropositivity ratios to im INF-β 1a, scINF-β 1a, and sc INF-β 1b were 21.4%, 28.6%, and 70.4%, respectively (total 40%), and total loss of bioactivity (MxA mRNA) were 9.3%, 9.5%, and 11.6%, respectively (total 10.2%). The correlation between high BAb titers and low MxA mRNA levels was highly significant (P = 0.00003). Our data indicate that there is a good correlation between especially high BAbs levels and diminished MxA mRNA levels.

Biomarkers of treatment response in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered a heterogeneous disease with respect to disease progression and treatment response, which have both remained highly unpredictable. With an increasing number of available disease modifying therapies, strategies for treatment allocation in the individual patient or subgroup of patients has become more important. Therefore biomarkers, which will identify subgroups of MS patients and predict treatment response early in the course of the disease, are urgently needed. Here we review current and emerging biomarkers, as well as study concepts for identification of new biomarkers in MS.

Review of the pharmacoeconomics of early treatment of multiple sclerosis using interferon beta

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common neurological disease with increasing incidence and prevalence. Onset of disease is most frequently in young adulthood when productivity is usually highest; it is of chronic nature and, in the majority of patients, it will result in accumulation of disability. Due to loss of productivity in patients and caregivers as well as high expenses for medical treatment, MS is considered a disease with high economic burden for patients and society. Several drugs have been approved for treatment of MS. While treatment ameliorates the course of the disease, it is very costly; therefore, pharmacoeconomics, evaluating costs and effects of disease-modifying treatment in MS, has become an important issue. Here, we review the economic impact and treatment strategies of MS and discuss recent studies on pharmacoeconomics of early treatment with interferon beta.

An assessment of biological potency and molecular characteristics of different innovator and noninnovator interferon-beta products

Approved innovator products and their noninnovator "copy" versions are likely to vary in their quality, eg, physicochemical characteristics and biological activity, with important implications for clinical efficacy and safety. Therefore, it is important to study and thoroughly evaluate the noninnovator products in comparison with approved products at the preclinical and clinical stages. We have obtained 4 noninnovator interferon (IFN)-β-1a products currently marketed in Latin America and Iran and compared these with approved IFN-β-1a products (Avonex and Rebif) obtained from the same geographical regions with respect to biological potency, estimated by in vitro bioassays, and molecular characteristics, assessed by immunoblotting and high-performance liquid chromatography. In this article, we present our data showing that the noninnovator IFN-β-1a products can vary considerably in their biological potency. In addition, we showed that all IFN-β-1a products formulated with human serum albumin contained variable amounts of higher-molecular-weight aggregates of IFN-β-1a and adducts with human serum albumin, these being more prevalent in 2 noninnovator IFN-β-1a products where biological potency was reduced compared with approved IFN-β-1a products. Additionally, significant lot-to-lot variability was observed for one of the noninnovator products. Taken together, the results of this study highlight the need for not only thorough in vitro characterization, but also preclinical and clinical assessment to ensure patient safety and efficacy.

Recommendations for clinical use of data on neutralising antibodies to interferon-beta therapy in multiple sclerosis

The identification of factors that can affect the efficacy of immunomodulatory drugs in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) is important. For the available interferon-beta products, neutralising antibodies (NAb) have been shown to affect treatment efficacy. In June, 2009, a panel of experts in MS and NAbs to interferon-beta therapy convened in Amsterdam, Netherlands, under the auspices of the Neutralizing Antibodies on Interferon beta in Multiple Sclerosis consortium, a European-based project of the 6th Framework Programme of the European Commission, to review and discuss data on NAbs and their practical consequences for the treatment of patients with MS on interferon beta. The panel believed that information about NAbs and other markers of biological activity of interferons (ie, myxovirus resistance protein A [MxA]) can be integrated with clinical and imaging indicators to guide individual treatment decisions. In cases of sustained high-titre NAb positivity and/or lack of MxA bioactivity, a switch to a non-interferon-beta therapy should be considered. In patients who are doing poorly clinically, therapy should be switched irrespective of NAb or MxA bioactivity.