Chronic Paroxysmal Hemicrania in a Patient with a Macroprolactinoma

Prolactin and oxytocin: potential targets for migraine treatment

Migraine is a severe neurovascular disorder of which the pathophysiology is not yet fully understood. Besides the role of inflammatory mediators that interact with the trigeminovascular system, cyclic fluctuations in sex steroid hormones are involved in the sex dimorphism of migraine attacks. In addition, the pituitary-derived hormone prolactin and the hypothalamic neuropeptide oxytocin have been reported to play a modulating role in migraine and contribute to its sex-dependent differences. The current narrative review explores the relationship between these two hormones and the pathophysiology of migraine. We describe the physiological role of prolactin and oxytocin, its relationship to migraine and pain, and potential therapies targeting these hormones or their receptors.In summary, oxytocin and prolactin are involved in nociception in opposite ways. Both operate at peripheral and central levels, however, prolactin has a pronociceptive effect, while oxytocin appears to have an antinociceptive effect. Therefore, migraine treatment targeting prolactin should aim to block its effects using prolactin receptor antagonists or monoclonal antibodies specifically acting at migraine-pain related structures. This action should be local in order to avoid a decrease in prolactin levels throughout the body and associated adverse effects. In contrast, treatment targeting oxytocin should enhance its signalling and antinociceptive effects, for example using intranasal administration of oxytocin, or possibly other oxytocin receptor agonists. Interestingly, the prolactin receptor and oxytocin receptor are co-localized with estrogen receptors as well as calcitonin gene-related peptide and its receptor, providing a positive perspective on the possibilities for an adequate pharmacological treatment of these nociceptive pathways. Nevertheless, many questions remain to be answered. More particularly, there is insufficient data on the role of sex hormones in men and the correct dosing according to sex differences, hormonal changes and comorbidities. The above remains a major challenge for future development.

A link between migraine and prolactin: the way forward

Migraine is an incapacitating neurological disorder that predominantly affects women. Sex and other hormones (e.g., oxytocin, and prolactin) may play a role in sexual dimorphic features of migraine. Initially, prolactin was recognized for its modulatory action in milk production and secretion; later, its roles in the regulation of the endocrine, immune and nervous systems were discovered. Higher prolactin levels in individuals with migraine were found in earlier studies, with a female sex-dominant trend. Studies that are more recent have identified that the expression of prolactin receptor in response to neuronal excitability and stress depends on sex with a dominant role in females. These findings have opened up potentials for explanation of sex-related pathophysiology of migraine, but have left some unanswered questions. This focused review examines the past and present of the link between prolactin and migraine, and presents open questions and directions for future experimental and clinical efforts.

Sex hormones (e.g., estrogen and progesterone) have been investigated to explain the sex-related manifestation of migraine, which is predominant in females. Prolactin is known for promoting lactation, but accumulating evidence supports that it can promote pain in females. An increasing number of studies have shown that the expression of a prolactin receptor in female nociceptors and their responses to external stimuli such as stress are different, which can help explain the female sex-dominant feature of migraine. In this focused review, the current knowledge is presented and the directions where prolactin research in migraine may evolve are proposed. The ultimate goal is to shape an overview toward considering sex-based treatments for migraine with highlighting the role of prolactin.

A prospective study of headache and neuropeptides in patients with pituitary adenomas

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical criteria for headache associated with pituitary adenoma (HaPA) in the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) 3rd edition version criteria and further determine whether elevations of plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide 1-38 (PACAP1-38) concentration contribute to HaPA.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical features of consecutive patients with pituitary adenoma were recorded. Plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide and PACAP1-38 concentrations in pituitary adenoma patients within 72 h pre- and post-operation were measured. Primary outcome for HaPA patients were 50% reduction of moderate-to-severe headache days at 3 months after discharge.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients with pituitary adenoma were recruited, 33 (52.4%) of whom had headache. The patients who had HaPA presented with migraine-like (32.9%), tension-type-like (12.1%), and stabbing headache (9.1%). Non-functional adenoma was present in the majority of cases (82.5%). Surgical resection improved headache in 83.3% of cases at 3 month follow-up. Pre- and post-operative calcitonin gene-related peptide and PACAP1-38 levels were significantly higher in patients with headache than in those without headache (p < 0.05). Plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide and PACAP1-38 levels at 72 h post-operation were lower at 72 h after operation in patients who had greater improvement in headache compared with those who had little improvement, while plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide and PACAP1-38 levels were similar between these two groups preoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Most pituitary adenoma patients have non-functional adenoma, and half of this group have HaPA, indicating that the ICHD-3 criteria for HaPA with the emphasis on secretion status need further modifications. Lower plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide and PACAP1-38 concentrations at 72 h after operation may predict a better outcome in patients with HaPA.

Pituitary Hormones and Orofacial Pain

Clinical and basic research on regulation of pituitary hormones, extra-pituitary release of these hormones, distribution of their receptors and cell signaling pathways recruited upon receptor binding suggests that pituitary hormones can regulate mechanisms of nociceptive transmission in multiple orofacial pain conditions. Moreover, many pituitary hormones either regulate glands that produce gonadal hormones (GnH) or are regulated by GnH. This implies that pituitary hormones may be involved in sex-dependent mechanisms of orofacial pain and could help explain why certain orofacial pain conditions are more prevalent in women than men. Overall, regulation of nociception by pituitary hormones is a relatively new and emerging area of pain research. The aims of this review article are to: (1) present an overview of clinical conditions leading to orofacial pain that are associated with alterations of serum pituitary hormone levels; (2) discuss proposed mechanisms of how pituitary hormones could regulate nociceptive transmission; and (3) outline how pituitary hormones could regulate nociception in a sex-specific fashion. Pituitary hormones are routinely used for hormonal replacement therapy, while both receptor antagonists and agonists are used to manage certain pathological conditions related to hormonal imbalance. Administration of these hormones may also have a place in the treatment of pain, including orofacial pain. Hence, understanding the involvement of pituitary hormones in orofacial pain, especially sex-dependent aspects of such pain, is essential to both optimize current therapies as well as provide novel and sex-specific pharmacology for a diversity of associated conditions.

Clinical Presentation and Management of Headache in Pituitary Tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides an overview of headache in the setting of pituitary adenoma. The purpose of this article is to educate providers on the association, possible pathophysiology, and the clinical presentation of headache in pituitary tumor.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent prospective evaluations indicate that risk factors for development of headache in the setting of pituitary adenoma include highly proliferative tumors, cavernous sinus invasion, and personal or family history of headache. Migraine-like headaches are the predominant presentation. Unilateral headaches are often ipsilateral to the side of cavernous sinus invasion. In summary, this paper describes how the size and type of pituitary tumors play an important role in causation of headaches. Pituitary adenoma-associated headache can also mimic primary headache disorders making recognition of a secondary process difficult. Therefore, this paper highlights the association of between trigeminal autonomic cephalgias and pituitary adenomas and urges practitioners to maintain a high index of suspicion when evaluating patients with these uncommon headache presentations. However, on balance, given the prevalence of both primary headache disorders and pituitary adenomas, determining causality can be challenging. A thoughtful and multidisciplinary approach is often the best management strategy, and treatment may require the expertise of multiple specialties including neurology, neurosurgery, and endocrinology.

Management of Skull Base Tumor-Associated Facial Pain

Cancer-associated facial pain can be caused by a variety of pathologic conditions. Here the authors describe the symptoms and incidence of facial pain secondary to three separate anatomic subcategories of cancer. The authors subsequently discuss the effectiveness and drawbacks of the most common methods of treatment.

Prolactinoma-associated headache and dopamine agonist treatment

AIM

The aim of this article is to investigate the phenotype and etiology of prolactinoma-associated headache as well as present and discuss the plausible pain-relieving effect of dopamine agonist treatment.

METHODS

In this case-based audit we included 11 patients with prolactinomas and one patient with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia presenting with headache that subsequently improved or resolved after dopamine agonist treatment.

RESULTS

A significant ipsilateral location of tumor mass and reported headache symptoms was observed (p = 0.018). After dopamine agonist treatment seven out of 12 patients became pain free within 2.5 months; after one year of treatment 11 out of 12 reported headache improvement or resolution. Average tumor volume reduction after treatment was 47 ± 22% during 9.5 ± 8.4 months of follow-up. There was no significant association between headache relief and tumor shrinkage (p = 0.43) or normalization of serum prolactin (p = 1.00), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

1) The significant association between lateralization of tumor and headache suggests a mechanical origin of the headache, 2) headache responded to dopamine agonist treatment in most patients, and 3) our observations encourage future prospective controlled trials to investigate the role of hyperprolactinemia in the pathogenesis of headache as well as the therapeutic effects of dopamine agonists.

Treatment of severe trigeminal headache in patients with pituitary adenomas

BACKGROUND

The incidence of headache in patients with pituitary adenomas is high, and the underlying pathological mechanisms are not completely understood.

OBJECTIVE

We tested the efficacy of percutaneous ganglion block and trigeminal rhizotomy in the treatment of severe trigeminal/autonomic headache associated with pituitary tumors.

METHODS

Eleven patients treated surgically for pituitary adenomas in whom intractable trigeminal headaches developed were enrolled in the study and underwent ictal cerebral single-photon emission computed tomography before starting treatment. Initially, all patients underwent a 6-month medical treatment trial. Patients who did not experience improvement in headache severity, addressed by the Headache Impact Test-6 scale, underwent trigeminal percutaneous ganglion blockade. Two patients subsequently underwent trigeminal balloon rhizotomy.

RESULTS

Among the 11 patients, 6 did not have improved Headache Impact Test-6 scale scores after 6 months of treatment with medications and underwent trigeminal ganglion blockade. Significant improvement in headache severity was noted in 3 of them. Long-term response was obtained in 1 patient, and the other 2, in whom the response was transient, were then successfully treated with trigeminal rhizotomy. Cerebral single-photon emission computed tomography showed increased uptake in the thalamus/hypothalamus region in patients who responded well to manipulation of the trigeminal-hypothalamic system.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous ganglion blockade and trigeminal rhizotomy may be promising alternative options for the treatment of severe headache in selected patients with pituitary adenomas.

Resolution of paroxysmal hemicrania after resection of intracranial meningioma

Paroxysmal hemicrania is a trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia first described in 1976, characterized by episodic attacks of excruciating unilateral periorbital and temporal stabbing, pulsatile, craw-like, or boring headaches lasting 2 - 30 minutes, accompanied by autonomic features, and alleviated by indomethacin. Paroxysmal hemicrania is divided into an episodic or chronic form, depending on the duration and frequency of the attacks. We describe a case of paroxysmal hemicrania in a patient with a contralateral anterior clinoid meningioma, which resolved after tumor resection. Most cases of autonomic cephalgias are primary headaches and not caused by underlying intracranial structural lesions. Based on our patient and a literature review of secondary causes of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, we recommend that all patients with trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias including paroxysmal hemicrania undergo neuroimaging studies. The preferred neuro-radiologic procedure should be a cranial MRI to exclude underlying structural intracranial lesions, particularly in the sellar and parasellar regions.

Headache attributed to non-vascular intracranial disorder

This chapter deals with non-vascular intracranial disorders resulting in headache. Headache attributed to high or low cerebrospinal fluid pressure is separated into headache attributed to idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), headache attributed to intracranial hypertension secondary to metabolic, toxic, or hormonal causes, headache attributed to intracranial hypertension secondary to hydrocephalus, post-dural puncture headache, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula headache, headache attributed to spontaneous (or idiopathic) low CSF pressure. Headache attributed to non-infectious inflammatory disease can be caused by neurosarcoidosis, aseptic (non-infectious) meningitis or lymphocytic hypophysitis. Headache attributed to intracranial neoplasm can be caused by increased intracranial pressure or hydrocephalus caused by neoplasm or attributed directly to neoplasm or carcinomatous meningitis. Other causes of headache include hypothalamic or pituitary hyper- or hyposecretion and intrathecal injection. Headache attributed to epileptic seizure is separated into hemicrania epileptica and post-seizure headache. Finally headache attributed to Chiari malformation type I (CM1) and the syndrome of transient headache and neurological deficits with cerebrospinal fluid lymphocytosis (HaNDL) are described.

Chronic headache and pituitary tumors

Pituitary tumors come to clinical attention due to endocrine dysfunction, distortion of local structures surrounding the pituitary fossa, or as an incidental finding during neuroimaging for headache. Explanations for pituitary tumor-associated headache include stretching of the dura mater and invasion of pain-producing structures within the cavernous sinus. However, small functional pituitary lesions may present with severe headache without cavernous sinus invasion or suprasellar extension. Prolactinomas and growth hormone-secreting tumors have a high prevalence of rare headache phenotypes with or without autonomic features, suggesting that biochemical abnormalities within the hypothalamo-pituitary axis may play a role in headache. Somatostatin analogues may be highly effective at aborting headache associated with functionally active pituitary lesions, particularly in the case of acromegaly. A proposed mechanism for this is inhibition of nociceptive peptides. This article summarizes the clinical features, pathophysiology, and potential treatment approaches to pituitary tumor-associated headache.

Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. Part 2: Paroxysmal hemicrania

Paroxysmal hemicrania (PH) is characterized by severe, strictly unilateral pain attacks lasting 2 to 30 minutes localized to orbital, supraorbital, and temporal areas accompanied by ipsilateral autonomic features. It represents 1 of 3 primary headaches classified as trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. Although PH is rare, patients may present to dental offices seeking relief for their pain. It is important for oral health care providers to recognize PH and render an accurate diagnosis. This will avoid the pitfall of implementing unnecessary and inappropriate traditional dental treatments in hopes of alleviating this neurovascular pain. This is part 2 of a review on trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias and focuses on PH. Aspects of PH including epidemiology, genetics, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, classification and variants, diagnosis, medical management, and dental considerations are discussed.

Headache and brain tumors

We review the current state of knowledge regarding headache and brain tumors. The epidemiology of this clinically relevant area is highlighted along with general clinical features of headache disorders seen in brain tumor patients. Some rarer clinical presentations are noted, particularly in relationship to the newly described trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, as well as the relationships of headache to pituitary tumors and paroxysmal and positional headaches. Headaches as a result of brain tumor therapy are noted, as is the important area of treatment of headaches in patients with central nervous system neoplasms of a primary or secondary nature.