Is Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Necessary in Routine Management of Breast Cancer? No

Can We Successfully De-Escalate Axillary Surgery in Women Aged ≥ 70 Years with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ or Early-Stage Breast Cancer Undergoing Mastectomy?

BACKGROUND

Omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in older women with clinically node-negative, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early-stage breast cancer undergoing lumpectomy is accepted, given established low rates of regional recurrence. The safety of omitting SLNB in women undergoing mastectomy is unknown and may differ depending on extent of breast disease and variation in radiotherapy use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2006 to 2018, 123 cTis and 328 cT1-2 HR+/HER2- tumors from 410 women aged ≥ 70 years who underwent mastectomy and SLNB were included (41 bilateral cases). The rate of nodal positivity and effect of nodal positivity on adjuvant therapy use were examined.

RESULTS

Median age was 74 years; 21% of patients had positive sentinel lymph nodes, 7% had micrometastases, and 14% had macrometastases. Of cases of cTis tumors, 31% were upstaged to invasive carcinoma; 1% had macrometastases. Fewer cases of cT1 than cT2 tumors had macrometastases [13% (26/200) versus 29% (37/128); p < 0.001]. Eight percent of patients with pT1 tumors (18/228) and 27% of patients with pT2 tumors (30/113) received chemotherapy. Most patients with pT1, pN1 disease (78%; 25/32) did not receive chemotherapy. Rates of locoregional recurrence were similar between patients with cT1 or cT2 tumors with and without nodal metastases (median follow-up, 4.5 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Women aged ≥ 70 years with cTis and cT1N0 HR+/HER2- tumors who underwent mastectomy had low rates of nodal positivity, similar to rates reported for lumpectomy. Given this and the RxPONDER results, omission of SLNB may be considered, as findings are unlikely to alter adjuvant therapy recommendations.

The reliability and accuracy of intraoperative imprint cytology of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a new component of the surgical treatment of breast cancer that accurately predicts axillary status. In this study the authors evaluated the accuracy of intraoperative imprint cytology (IC) in comparison with definitive histologic evaluation of SLN in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

A total 413 women with breast carcinoma and clinically negative axillary nodes underwent breast surgery and SLN biopsy. Mapping of SLN involved injection of (99m)Technecium labelled human albumin nanocolloid particles and Patent Blue dye. At the Department of Pathology, SLNs were bisected along its major axis. Both halves were imprinted 2-4 times on the slides and immediate staining with Hemacolor (Merck Germany) was performed for intraoperative examination. Imprint node negative women underwent no further surgery, while node positive women proceeded to full axillary clearance. Histological analysis of the SLN involved serial sectioning of the whole node with H&E and immunostaining for cytokeratin.

RESULTS

Definitive histology revealed metastases (pN+) in 159/413 patients (38.5%): 69 (16.7%) macro metastases, 57 (13.8%) micro metastases, and 33 (8%) women with only isolated IHC positive cells or positive cell groups smaller than 0.2 mm (pNO sn+). The other 254 women had negative SLN biopsy. Imprint cytology detected 54/69 macro metastases, and 4/57 micro metastases. In the group with negative SLN (254), 2 cases were ''false positives''.

CONCLUSIONS

Imprint of SLN biopsy can identify a negative axilla with high accuracy (specificity 99.2%). Overall sensitivity is only 36.5%, but macrometastases are detected in 77% which is important for performing ALDN in one session with operation of primary tumour.

Clinicopathologic analysis of sentinel lymph node mapping in early breast cancer

Axillary nodal status is the most significant prognosticator for predicting survival and guiding adjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) represents a minimally invasive procedure with low morbidity for staging axillary nodal status. In this article we review and report our experiences in patients with early breast cancer who underwent SLNB at the Revlon/UCLA Breast Center. Between September 1998 and May 2000, a total 83 SLNBs were performed in 81 patients with proven breast cancer and negative axillary examination who elected to have SLNB as the first step of nodal staging. Two patients had bilateral breast cancer. SLNB was localized by using both 99Tc sulfur colloid (83 cases) and isosulfan blue dye (75 cases). Data of these patients were prospectively collected and analyzed. The clinical and pathologic characteristics of women with positive and negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were compared to identify features predictive of SLN metastasis. Of the 83 cases, the SLN was successfully localized in 82 (98.8%). Sixty-three percent of patients had SLNs found in level I only, 18.3% in both level I and II, and 4.9% in level II alone. The vast majority (84.3%) of these cases had T1 breast cancer with an average size of 1.55 cm for the entire series. Twenty-three patients (28%) had positive SLNs, with an average of 1.5 positive SLNs per patient. Fifteen had metastases detected by hematoxylin and eosin staining and 8 had micrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using anticytokeratin antibodies. Ten of the former group agreed to and 2 of the latter group opted for full axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). An average of 17.5 lymph nodes were removed from each ALND procedure. Additional metastases or micrometastases were found in seven patients (in a total of 28 lymph nodes). Three patients with completely negative SLNs experienced additional axillary lymph node removal due to their election of free flap reconstruction. None had metastases detected in these lymph nodes. The absence of estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR) by IHC (p = 0.036) and the presence of lymphatic/vascular invasion (LVI) (p = 0.002) predicted positive SLNs in patients with early breast cancer in a univariate analysis; in a multivariate analysis only LVI was predictive (p = 0.0125). Histologic type, nuclear grade, tumor differentiation, HER-2/neu and p53 status, S-phase fraction, and DNA ploidy did not predict SLN status. Immediate postoperative complications were uncommon and delayed complications completely absent. Because of the high detection rate, accurate staging, and minimal morbidity, SLNB should be offered as a choice to women with small breast cancers and clinically negative nodes. Because positive LVI and negative ER/PR status are highly predictive of pathologically positive SLNs in small breast cancers, women whose cancers meet these criteria should be advised preoperatively about their risk of having a positive SLN and may benefit from intraoperative assessment (frozen section and/or touch preparation) of their SLNs.

Is axillary lymph node dissection necessary in elderly patients with breast carcinoma who have a clinically uninvolved axilla?

BACKGROUND

Axillary dissection in elderly patients with early-stage breast carcinoma who do not have palpable axillary lymph nodes is controversial because of the associated morbidity of the surgery, reduced life expectancy of the patients, and efficacy of hormone therapy in preventing recurrences and axillary events.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 671 consecutive patients with breast carcinoma who were age >or= 70 years and who underwent conservative breast surgery with axillary dissection (172 patients) or without axillary dissection (499 patients). Tamoxifen always was given. The effects of axillary dissection compared with no axillary dissection on breast carcinoma mortality and distant metastasis were analyzed using multiple proportional-hazards regression models. Because the assignment to axillary treatment was nonrandom, covariate adjustments were made for baseline variables that influenced the decision to perform axillary dissection and for prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The crude cumulative incidence curves for breast carcinoma mortality and distant metastasis did not appear to differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.530 and P = 0.840, respectively). The crude cumulative incidences of axillary lymph node occurrence at 5 years and 10 years were 4.4% and 5.9%, respectively (3.1% and 4.1%, respectively, for patients with pT1 tumors).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with breast carcinoma who have no evidence of axillary lymph node involvement may be treated effectively with conservative surgery and tamoxifen. Immediate axillary dissection is not necessary but should be performed in the small percentage of patients who later develop overt axillary lymph node involvement.

Five-node biopsy of the axilla: an alternative to axillary dissection of levels I-II in operable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Axillary clearance of patients with early breast cancer is accompanied by a high risk of arm morbidity. Less invasive ways to establish the axillary nodal status are therefore of interest, especially in women with low risk of nodal metastases.

METHODS

Four hundred and fifteen breast cancer patients (clinical stage T(0-3) N(0-1) M(0)) were operated in the axilla with a five-node biopsy followed in the same operation by a further dissection of levels I-II of the axilla in order to evaluate the accuracy of the five-node node biopsy compared with level I-II dissection.

RESULTS

In all patients the sensitivity of the five-node biopsy was 97.3% with a negative predictive value of 98.5% and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.027. Among cases detected by screening (n=204) and those clinically detected (n=197) the sensitivity of the five-node biopsy was 95.8% and 97.9% respectively, with negative predictive values of 98.7% and 98.0% and negative likelihood ratios of 0.042 and 0.021 respectively.

CONCLUSION

Five-node biopsy of the axilla has good accuracy for correctly staging the axilla in both clinically and screening-detected cases. Five-node biopsy is an alternative to axillary clearance and sentinel node biopsy in patients with operable breast cancer.

Treatment implications of a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping and biopsy is emerging as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in determining the lymph node status of patients with early-stage breast carcinoma. The hypothesis of the technique is that the SLN is the first lymph node in the regional lymphatic basin that drains the primary tumor. Non-SLN (NSLN) metastasis in the axilla is unlikely if the axillary SLN shows no tumor involvement, and, thus, further axillary interference may be avoided. However, the optimal treatment of the axilla in which an SLN metastasis is found requires ongoing evaluation. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the predictors for NSLN metastasis in the presence of a tumor-involved axillary SLN and to examine the treatment implications for patients with early-stage breast carcinoma.

METHODS

Between June 1998 and May 2000, 167 patients participated in the pilot study of SLN mapping and biopsy at Westmead Hospital. SLNs were identified successfully and biopsied in 140 axillae. All study patients also underwent ALND. The incidence of NSLN metastasis in the 51 patients with a SLN metastasis was correlated with clinical and pathologic characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 51 patients with a positive SLN, 24 patients (47%) had NSLN metastases. The primary tumor size was the only significant predictor for NSLN involvement. NSLN metastasis occurred in 25% of patients (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 10-47%) with a primary tumor size </= 20 mm and in 67% of patients (95%CI, 46-83%) with a primary tumor size > 20 mm (P = 0.005). The size of the SLN metastasis was not associated significantly with NSLN involvement. Three of 7 patients (43%) with an SLN micrometastasis (< 1 mm) had NSLN involvement compared with 38 of 44 patients (48%) with an SLN macrometastasis (> or = 1 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study did not identify a subgroup of SLN positive patients in whom the incidence of NSLN involvement was low enough to warrant no further axillary interference. At present, a full axillary dissection should be performed in patients with a positive SLN.

Follow-up of sentinel node negative breast cancer patients without axillary lymph node dissection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients at our institution and to report the follow-up status of node-negative patients with removal of only the sentinel node.

METHODS

A total of 247 breast cancer patients underwent sentinel node (SN) mapping between June of 1996 and September of 2000. The SN was identified by using a combination of vital blue dye and a radiolabeled colloid.

RESULTS

A SN was identified in 227 of 247 patients (91.9%). One hundred forty-five were SN negative, 82 were SN positive. All SN-positive patients underwent axillary dissection of level I and II, whereas 83 patients with a negative SN had SN biopsy only. Median follow-up of these patients at 22 months revealed no axillary recurrence; the morbidity resulting from SN biopsy was negligible.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the follow-up is very short, SN biopsy only in node-negative breast cancer patients had no negative impact on the axillary failure rate and resulted in negligible morbidity.

Morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection for patients with breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Axillary lymph node dissection for staging the axilla in breast carcinoma patients is associated with considerable morbidity, such as edema of the arm, pain, sensory disturbances, impairment of arm mobility, and shoulder stiffness. Sentinel lymph node biopsy electively removes the first lymph node, which gets the drainage from the tumor and should therefore be associated with nearly zero morbidity.

METHODS

Postoperative morbidity (increase in arm circumference, subjective lymphedema, pain, numbness, effect on arm strength and mobility, and stiffness) of the operated arm was prospectively compared in 35 breast carcinoma patients after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) of Level I and II and 35 patients following sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Postoperative follow-up was 15.4 months (range, 4-28 months) in the SN group and 17.0 months (range, 4-28 months) in the ALND group. Following axillary dissection, patients showed a significant increase in upper and forearm circumference of the operated arm compared with the SN patients, as well as a significantly higher rate of subjective lymphedema, pain, numbness, and motion restriction. No difference between the two groups was found regarding arm stiffness or arm strength, nor did the type of surgery affect daily living.

CONCLUSIONS

SN biopsy is associated with negligible morbidity compared with complete axillary lymph node dissection.

Six-year follow-up of patients with microinvasive, T1a, and T1b breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Management of patients with breast cancers < or = 1 cm remains controversial. Reports of infrequent nodal metastases in tumors < or = 5 mm has led to suggestions that axillary dissection should be selective, and that tumor characteristics should guide adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 290 patients with breast cancer 1 cm in size or smaller from 1989 to 1991 was done. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

There were 95 T1a (< or = 5 mm) and 196 T1b (6-10 mm) cancers. Nodal metastases were found in 8 T1a and 26 T1b tumors. Larger size, poorer differentiation, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were associated with more nodal metastases, but none of these trends reached statistical significance. The 6-year DDFS was 93% for node-negative and 87% for node-positive patients (P = .02). Overall, breast cancers with poorer differentiation and LVI trended toward a poorer outcome. For patients with node-negative tumors, LVI was associated with a poorer outcome (P = .03). The size of the primary tumor was not predictive of outcome. There were no nodal metastases or recurrences in the 18 patients with microinvasive breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node status is the major determinant of outcome in breast cancers 1 cm in size or smaller. Accurate axillary assessment remains crucial in management of small breast cancer.

Subareolar versus peritumoral injection for location of the sentinel lymph node

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is fast becoming the standard for testing lymph node involvement in many institutions. However, questions remain as to the best method of injection. The authors hypothesized that a subareolar injection of material would drain to the same lymph node as a peritumoral injection, regardless of the location of the tumor.

METHODS

To test this theory, 68 patients with 69 operable invasive breast carcinomas and clinically node-negative disease were enrolled in this single-institution Institutional Review Board-approved trial. Patients were injected with 1.0 mCi of technetium-99 sulfur colloid (unfiltered) in the subareolar area of the tumor-bearing breast. Each patient received an injection of 2 to 5 cc of isosulfan blue around the tumor. Radioactive SLNs were identified using a hand-held gamma detector probe.

RESULTS

The average age of patients entered into this trial was 55.2 +/- 13.4 years. The average size of the tumors was 1.48 +/- 1.0 cm. Thirty-two percent of the patients had undergone previous excisional breast biopsies. Of the 69 lesions, 62 (89.9%) had SLNs located with the blue dye and 65 (94.2%) with the technetium. In four patients, the SLN was not located with either method. All blue SLNs were also radioactive. All located SLNs were in the axilla. Of the 62 patients in which the SLNs were located with both methods, an average of 1.5 +/- 0.7 SLNs were found per patient, of which 23.2% had metastatic disease. All four patients in which no SLN was located with either method had undergone prior excisional biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that subareolar injection of technetium is as accurate as peritumoral injection of blue dye. Central injection is easy and avoids the necessity for image-guided injection of nonpalpable breast lesions. Finally, subareolar injection of technetium avoids the problem of overlap of the radioactive zone of diffusion of the injection site with the radioactive sentinel lymph node, particularly in medial and upper outer quadrant lesions.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Determination of axillary nodal status is essential for the staging of breast cancer since nodal status is one of the most important predictors of survival. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the histology of the first draining lymph node (LN) accurately predicts the histology of the rest of the axillary LNs.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with operable invasive breast carcinoma and clinically negative axillary lymph nodes were studied. Patients were injected with Technetium-99 (99Tc) sulfur colloid around the primary tumor. A hand-held gamma detector probe was used to identify the sentinel LN (SLN). After the SLN was identified and removed, a level I and II lymphadenectomy was performed.

RESULTS

The SLN was identified in 53 (96.3%) of the 55 patients entered into the trial. The sensitivity was 88.2% and the specificity was 100%. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 94.6%. The accuracy of the study was 96.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The SLN biopsy for breast cancer staging is highly accurate in our hands and has the potential to decrease the morbidity and cost of managing patients with breast cancer without compromise of staging.

Use of touch preps for intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative touch prep (TP) is highly accurate for determining positive breast cancer margins and thereby reducing the need for second surgeries. It also may be useful in determining the status of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) during the initial surgical resection. The objective of this study was to test the ability of intraoperative TP to predict metastatic disease and, thus, the necessity for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) at the time of SLN biopsy.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with invasive breast cancer were entered in the SLN biopsy protocol. The SLN was identified by gamma probe, dissected, and sent to pathology for TP and permanent sections. Level I and II ALND was then performed. Any radiolabeled LN in the lymphadenectomy specimen also was sent for TP and permanent sections.

RESULTS

A total of 124 radiolabeled lymph nodes (LNs) were submitted for TP; of these, 93 (75%) were SLNs. Pathologic diagnosis by TP was correct compared with permanent sections for 99.2% of the nodes. There were no false positives. There was one (0.8%) false negative. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 99%. Sensitivity was 95.7% and specificity was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

TP is a simple, quick, and accurate method for detecting metastatic disease in the SLN and, when used intraoperatively, enables the surgeon to determine whether or not an ALND is necessary at the time of the initial surgery.

Sentinel node biopsy in the staging of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer is currently being reevaluated. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) holds promise for replacing full dissection in a large number of patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS

We evaluated SNB utilizing an intraoperative gamma probe localization technique following injection of technetium sulfur colloid in 80 patients with primary breast cancer and clinically negative axillae. Forty-eight patients were evaluated at Baptist Medical Center, Montgomery, Alabama, and 32 at Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois.

RESULTS

At least one sentinel node was found in 70 of the 80 patients (88%). One patient had a sentinel node in both the axilla and internal mammary chain. The remainder had axillary sentinel nodes only. The sentinel nodes accurately predicted the status of the axilla in 69 of the 70 patients (99%). One of 14 node-positive patients would have been missed with sentinel node biopsy alone, for a false negative rate of 7%. Four node-positive patients would have been missed with routine ALND without serial sectioning (SS) and immunohistochemical staining (IH) of the sentinel node.

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel node biopsy with SS and IH more precisely predicted the status of the axilla than routine ALND in this group of patients. SNB will likely replace full axillary dissection in the majority of patients with breast cancer.