Physical Examination of Arteriovenous Fistulae by a Renal Fellow: Does It Compare Favorably to an Experienced Interventionalist?

Color Doppler ultrasound evaluation of arteriovenous grafts for hemodialysis

Although arteriovenous fistula (AVF) continues to be the vascular access of choice for the hemodialysis, arteriovenous graft (AVG) can be the best choice in certain categories of patients and could have several advantages over AVF in a "patient centered approach" to vascular access. In the clinical management of prosthetic fistulas, color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) is the imaging method of choice for identifying stenosis and other AVG complications. In this review, besides highlighting the pivotal role of CDU in the diagnosis of AVG complications, we will underline the key role that ultrasound can play in identifying those stenosis most likely to cause AVG thrombosis. Furthermore, we will emphasize the support that CDU can play in distinguishing the different types of grafts and prosthetic devices such as stent-grafts, in identifying AVG with lower survival, CDU utilities and limitations in the evaluation of freshly-implanted grafts, the different sites available for AVG volume flow measurement and their use based on the configuration of the prosthesis, the time interval elapsed from the surgical intervention and the integrity of the prosthetic walls.

Comparison of clinical examination, doppler and fistulogram for arterio-venous fistula surveillance in detecting secondary failure

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) surveillance is required to detect early dysfunction (thrombosis, stenosis) and its timely correction prolongs access-patency. Clinical examination (CE) and doppler have been used as screening/surveillance of AVF, for early detection of AVF dysfunction. Since there was inadequate evidence for KDOQI to make recommendations on AVF surveillance and on secondary failure rate. We compared CE, doppler and fistulogram as surveillance modalities in detecting a secondary failure in matured AVF.

METHODOLOGY

This prospective-observational, single-center study, was done between December 2019-April 2021. CKD stage 5 patients on dialysis/Not-on-dialysis with matured AVF were included at third month. CE, doppler (blood flow, vein diameter, depth), and fistulogram were done at third and sixth month. Secondary failure was assessed at sixth month classifying AVF to patent/functional and failed group. Diagnostic tests were performed by comparing three methods considering fistulogram as gold-standard. Residual urine output is also monitored to look for any contrast induced residual renal function loss.

RESULTS

Of total 407 created AVF, 98 (24%) had primary failure. Twenty-five (6%) had surgical complications including unsuccessful AVF and aneurysm/rupture, 156 lost follow-up at third month, 104 consented patients were enrolled, 16 lost to follow-up subsequently, and 88 patients' data were analyzed at the end. At the sixth month, 76(86.4%) had patent AVF, 8 (9.1%) had secondary failure (Thrombosis-4, Central Venous Stenosis-4), and 4 (4.1%) patients expired. Considering fistulogram as a diagnostic standard, CE showed 87.5% sensitivity, and 93.4% specificity (cohen's kappa value of 0.66). Doppler had sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 96% respectively (cohen's kappa value of 0.75), Combination of clinical examination with doppler showed sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 89% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although the secondary AVF failure rate is less than the primary, CE is an important and valuable tool in the diagnosis and surveillance of AVF in detecting its dysfunction. Moreover, CE with doppler can be used as a surveillance protocol that can detect early AVF dysfunction at par with Fistulogram.

A review of the current recommendations and practices for hemodialysis access monitoring and maintenance procedures

The growing number of prevalent arteriovenous (AV) accesses has been associated with an increase in the incidence of procedures being performed to maintain patency. To reduce the rate of unnecessary procedures, the 2019 Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines addended the AV access surveillance recommendations, which includes clinical monitoring and assessment of dialysis adequacy alone. Abnormal clinical findings would necessitate follow-up angiography with or without confirmatory duplex ultrasound. Due to poor patency, increased surveillance schedules have been proposed to identify stenosis early and potentially prevent acute thrombotic events and AV access failure. In this review, we outlined current AV access monitoring and maintenance procedure recommendations, as described by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and 2019 Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines. In addition, we highlight the findings of recently published randomized controlled trials that have examined increased surveillance schedules.

Association of risk stratification score with dialysis vascular access stenosis

BACKGROUNDS

Clinical monitoring is the recommended standard for identifying dialysis access dysfunction; however, clinical monitoring requires skill and training, which is challenging for understaffed clinics and overburdened healthcare personnel. A vascular access risk stratification score was recently proposed to assist in detecting dialysis access dysfunction.

PURPOSE

Our objective was to evaluate the utility of using vascular access risk scores to assess venous stenosis in hemodialysis vascular accesses.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled adult patients who were receiving hemodialysis through an arteriovenous access and who had a risk score ⩽3 (low-risk) or ⩾8 (high-risk). We compared the occurrence of access stenosis (>50% on ultrasonography or angiography) between low-risk and high-risk groups and assessed clinical monitoring results for each group.

RESULTS

Of the 38 patients analyzed (18 low-risk; 20 high-risk), 16 (42%) had significant stenosis. Clinical monitoring results were positive in 39% of the low-risk and 60% of the high-risk group (p = 0.19). The high-risk group had significantly higher occurrence of stenosis than the low-risk group (65% vs 17%; p = 0.003). Sensitivity and specificity of a high score for identifying stenosis were 81% and 68%, respectively. The positive predictive value of a high-risk score was 65%, and the negative predictive value was 80%. Only 11 (58%) of 19 subjects with positive clinical monitoring had significant stenosis. In a multivariable model, the high-risk group had seven-fold higher odds of stenosis than the low-risk group (aOR = 7.38; 95% CI, 1.44-37.82; p = 0.02). Positive clinical monitoring results and previous stenotic history were not associated with stenosis. Every unit increase in the score was associated with 34% higher odds of stenosis (aOR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.05-1.70; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

A calculated risk score may help predict the development of hemodialysis vascular access stenosis and may provide a simple and reliable objective measure for risk stratification.

Elevated plasma leptin levels are associated with vascular access dysfunction in patients on maintenance hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Inflammation has been associated with vascular access (VA) dysfunction. The adipocytokine leptin can directly induce pro-inflammatory T helper 1 immune responses and the pathogenesis of chronic inflammation. We explored the association between plasma leptin and VA dysfunction in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HEMO).

METHODS

A total of 344 consecutive patients who received anastomosis for VA at a single HEMO center between June 1, 2010 and December 31, 2021 were screened. Of these patients, 267 met the inclusion criteria and were included. ELISA was used to measure circulating levels of leptin.

RESULTS

The VA dysfunction group had a higher leptin level than the patent VA group. A higher concentration of leptin was independently and significantly associated with an elevated risk of VA dysfunction. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that leptin, female sex, and hypertension were independently associated with VA dysfunction, even after adjusting for known biomarkers. We then evaluated the ability of leptin, female sex, and hypertension to predict the risk of VA dysfunction, and the area under the curve (AUC) for leptin was 0.626 (p = 0.0001). When leptin, female sex, and hypertension were added to this multivariate model, the AUC increased to 0.679 (p = 0.001) for leptin and hypertension, and 0.690 for leptin, hypertension, and female sex (p = 0.004). In addition, plasma leptin levels were associated with sex, body mass index, and hemoglobin.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the association between leptin and VA dysfunction, hypertension and female sex independently predicted VA dysfunction in patients with HEMO.

Snuff-Box Versus Wrist Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistulas for Hemodialysis: Maturation Tend and its Affecting Factors

BACKGROUND

Thanks to its well proved long-term patency rates, native radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula remains the most commonly used vascular access type. Many articles had approached the criteria leading to a mature fistula. The aims of this work are to evaluate variables that may affect the maturation of distal fistulas and to determine if wrist fistulas have less risk of maturation failure than the snuff-box fistulas.

METHODS

We recorded all distal radiocephalic fistulas that had been created from January 2018 to February 2021. Epidemiological and clinical profile of patients, characteristics of performed fistulas and per and post-operative data were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

From January 2018 to February 2021, 165 upper limb vascular accesses for hemodialysis had been created including 47 (28.5%) distal radiocephalic fistulas. Among the latter, 39 (83%) fistulas were performed at the wrist and 8 (17%) at snuff-box area. There were 34 men (72.3%). Mean age was 67 years (37-87). Both types of fistulas had approximately an identic frequency of primary maturation failure (50% for radiocephalic versus 47.2% for snuff-box fistulas). Secondary maturation had been achieved in 9 fistulas. Patients with medical history of dyslipidemia, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), central catheter placement, and bad quality of vessels tend to develop an immature fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in maturation tend between snuff-box and wrist fistulas had been demonstrated. Thus, it seems reasonable to privilege the creation of the most distal fistulas allowing preservation of wrist fistulas as a second option in case of snuff-box fistulas maturation failure. However, selection of the most suitable cases for snuff-box fistulas creation, based on clinical and duplex ultrasound data, remains primordial.

Clinical Aspects of Dialysis Interventions: Physical and Sonographic Findings

Physical examination (PE) of arteriovenous access remains of high clinical value and continues to be recommended by leading societies and guidelines. PE is easy to learn and perform. Once learned, examiners can provide a comprehensive arteriovenous (AV) access examination in 20 to 30 seconds. Therefore, we continue to advocate that AV access PE should be part of the training for all dialysis care providers. Similarly, ultrasound can provide important AV access evaluation and provide key information. It is relatively cheap and can be readily available at the bed side. Additionally, it is well accepted by patients, as it is not expected to be associated with pain or discomfort during the examination. We present in this review the key components of PE, signs and symptoms of AV access dysfunction, and the role of ultrasound in AV access evaluation as a complementary tool to PE.

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model Predicting Arteriovenous Fistula Failure in a Large Network of Dialysis Clinics

Background: Vascular access surveillance of dialysis patients is a challenging task for clinicians. We derived and validated an arteriovenous fistula failure model (AVF-FM) based on machine learning. Methods: The AVF-FM is an XG-Boost algorithm aimed at predicting AVF failure within three months among in-centre dialysis patients. The model was trained in the derivation set (70% of initial cohort) by exploiting the information routinely collected in the Nephrocare European Clinical Database (EuCliD^®). Model performance was tested by concordance statistic and calibration charts in the remaining 30% of records. Features importance was computed using the SHAP method. Results: We included 13,369 patients, overall. The Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC-ROC) of AVF-FM was 0.80 (95% CI 0.79–0.81). Model calibration showed excellent representation of observed failure risk. Variables associated with the greatest impact on risk estimates were previous history of AVF complications, followed by access recirculation and other functional parameters including metrics describing temporal pattern of dialysis dose, blood flow, dynamic venous and arterial pressures. Conclusions: The AVF-FM achieved good discrimination and calibration properties by combining routinely collected clinical and sensor data that require no additional effort by healthcare staff. Therefore, it can potentially enable risk-based personalization of AVF surveillance strategies.

Monitoring the Patient Following Radio-Cephalic Arteriovenous Fistula Creation: Current Perspectives

Autogenous radial–cephalic direct wrist arteriovenous fistula (RC-AVF) in the non-dominant arm is the gold standard for dialysis vascular access. However, the RC-AVF non-maturation rate is significant (≃ 40%) due to an increasingly elderly and comorbid population incidence. A detailed identification of the biological cascade underlying arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation could be the key to clinical research aimed at identify the group of patients at risk of primary AVF failure. Currently, careful post-operative monitoring remains the most crucial aspect to overcome the problem of impaired maturation. Up to 80% of patients with immature RC-AVF have problems potentially solvable with early endovascular or surgical correction. Physical examination by experienced practitioners in conjunction with duplex ultrasound examination (DUS) can identify physical signs of non-maturation, understand the underlying cause, and drive for a tailored early planning to treat the complication. New approaches for the early assessment of AVF maturation are under study. Techniques to promote RC-AVF maturation performed through the administration of pre-or peri-operative drugs have missed up to now to prove an efficacy in improving fistula success. The new techniques tested after surgery appear to hold future promise for improving fistula maturation.

Vascular sound visualization system is useful for monitoring and surveillance of vascular access

BACKGROUNDS

Vascular access (VA) is a lifeline for maintenance hemodialysis patients. Monitoring and surveillance of VA, therefore, play an important role for maintaining VA patency. Surveillance needs special apparatus to estimate the VA function, while, monitoring including physical examination does not usually need such devices but highly skill-dependent and qualitative.

PURPOSE

We report the clinical utility in monitoring and surveillance of VA using a newly developed electronic stethoscope and vascular sound visualization application.

METHODS

One hundred eight patients participated in the study. The vascular sounds were collected using the electronic stethoscope, converted into digital data, sent wirelessly to a personal computer, and then calculated. The units for the calculated intensity of the vascular sound were decibel [dB]. The intensity, however, was normalized as INDEX values ranging from 0 to 99 for practical use. Correlation between INDEX and the mean flow volume (mFV) and resistance index (RI) of brachial artery measured by Doppler ultrasound sonography were examined for VA surveillance. INDEX was continually measured at each dialysis session in ten patients who underwent the angioplasty for VA monitoring.

RESULTS

INDEX significantly correlated with the mFV (coefficient of correlation value = 0.68, p < 0.001) and RI (coefficient of correlation value = -0.51, p < 0.001) of brachial artery. Using the calculated cut-off values, the accuracy of INDEX for the diagnosis of AVF dysfunction ranged from 66% to 82%. INDEX attained the peak just after the angioplasty of culprit lesions and gradually decreased from one patient to another.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that vascular sound visualization system can be useful in VA monitoring and surveillance for detecting and predicting the access stenosis.

A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodialysis Access Blood Flow Surveillance Compared to Standard of Care: The Hemodialysis Access Surveillance Evaluation (HASE) Study

Introduction

Arteriovenous (AV) access thrombosis remains 1 of the most troubling AV access–related complications affecting hemodialysis patients. It necessitates an urgent and occasionally complicated thrombectomy procedure and increases the risk of AV access loss. AV access stenosis is found in the majority of thrombosed AV accesses. The routine use of AV access surveillance for the early detection and management of stenosis to reduce the thrombosis rate remains controversial.

Methods

We have conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the standard of care coupled with ultrasound dilution technique (UDT) flow measurement monthly surveillance with the standard of care alone.

Results

We prospectively randomized 436 patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG) using cluster (shift) randomization to surveillance and control groups. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographic data between the 2 groups, except for ethnicity (P = 0.017). Patients were followed on average for 15.2 months. There were significantly less per-patient thrombotic events (Poisson rate) in the surveillance group (0.12/patient) compared with the control group (0.23/patient) (P = 0.012). There was no statistically significant difference in the total number of procedures between the 2 groups, irrespective of whether thrombectomy procedures were included or excluded, and no statistically significant differences in the rate of or time to the first thrombotic event or the number of catheters placed due to thrombosis.

Conclusion

The use of UDT flow measurement monthly AV access surveillance in this multicenter randomized controlled trial reduced the per-patient thrombotic events without significantly increasing the total number of angiographic procedures. Even though there is a trend, surveillance did not reduce the first thrombotic event rate.

Construction and validation of a scale for assessing arteriovenous fistulas

Aim:

This methodological study was conducted to develop a reliable instrument for the assessment of the arteriovenous fistula in patients under hemodialysis therapy. The purpose of the scale is to evaluate risk of developing arteriovenous fistula complications in patients receiving hemodialysis treatment.

Methods:

An item pool was created in accordance with data obtained from our literature review and expert opinions. Validity of the scale was evaluated using construct and content validity analyses. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, test–retest, and split-half reliability were used to assess reliability.

Results:

The final 3-point Likert-type Arteriovenous Fistula Assessment Scale developed in this study consists of 18 items in three subdimensions: arteriovenous fistula flow, stenosis and ischemia, and needle entry site. The scale-level Content Validity Ratio was 0.90. Explanatory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure with factor loadings of 0.622–0.800, 0.361–0.891, and 0.431–0.954, respectively, explaining 55.51% of the total variance. The Cronbach’s alpha values for the subdimensions were 0.72, 0.71, and 0.83, respectively, and 0.82 for the scale overall.

Conclusion:

The Arteriovenous Fistula Assessment Scale is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to monitor arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients.

KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update

The National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) has provided evidence-based guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access since 1996. Since the last update in 2006, there has been a great accumulation of new evidence and sophistication in the guidelines process. The 2019 update to the KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access is a comprehensive document intended to assist multidisciplinary practitioners care for chronic kidney disease patients and their vascular access. New topics include the end-stage kidney disease "Life-Plan" and related concepts, guidance on vascular access choice, new targets for arteriovenous access (fistulas and grafts) and central venous catheters, management of specific complications, and renewed approaches to some older topics. Appraisal of the quality of the evidence was independently conducted by using a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and interpretation and application followed the GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks. As applicable, each guideline statement is accompanied by rationale/background information, a detailed justification, monitoring and evaluation guidance, implementation considerations, special discussions, and recommendations for future research.

Influence of intraoperative findings on immediate flow through radial-cephalic arteriovenous wrist fistulas for hemodialysis access

Background

Adequate flow through a newly created arteriovenous fistula depends on multiple characteristics of the vessels and patient comorbidities. Several studies have related preoperative findings to failure, but few have analyzed the influence of intraoperative findings.

Objectives

To evaluate the predictive value of intraoperative findings on the immediate outcome of radial-cephalic arteriovenous wrist fistulas (RCAVF) by collecting data that are easily measured intraoperatively.

Methods

We designed a cross-sectional study, in which a single surgeon performed 101 RCAVF in 100 patients at a single center. We analyzed the immediate postoperative flow, assessed by thrill intensity immediately after fistula creation, against patient demographics and intraoperative data. The following variables were analyzed: age, sex, comorbidities, length of vein visible at preoperative examination, macroscopic arterial calcification, maximum vein diameter, and length of stenosis-free vein, measured by cannulation with a urethral catheter during the procedure. The chi-square test was used both to eliminate possible bias introduced by side of venous access (left or right), and to determine predictive values of immediate thrill.

Results

Side of access was not associated with any significant differences in variables. Absence of macroscopic arterial calcification, successful venous catheterization using a 6 French catheter or larger, and ability to advance it more than 10 centimeters along the lumen of the proximal vein were correlated with adequate immediate postoperative thrill (p = 0.004, p < 0.001, and p = 0.005, respectively).

Conclusions

In this series of 101 RCAVF, both the diameter of the catheter and its progress through the proximal vein and also absence of arterial calcification had positive predictive value for achieving adequate immediate thrill after vascular access construction.

Placement of tunneled cuffed catheter for hemodialysis: Micropuncture kit versus Angiocath IV catheter

INTRODUCTION

Tunneled cuffed catheters provide stable, instantaneous, long-term intravenous access for hemodialysis. Because catheterization is often performed in emergency situations, speed and accuracy are emphasized.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared the Micropuncture kit with the standard 18-gauge Angiocath IV catheter for tunneled cuffed catheter insertion in the right jugular vein. From June 2016 to May 2017, 31 tunneled cuffed catheters were successfully inserted via the Micropuncture kit and another 31 via the Angiocath IV catheter. All patients underwent the same ultrasound-guided procedure performed by a single experienced interventionalist. Procedure time was the time from draping of the patient to the completion of povidone dressing after the catheterization. In our center, the Angio Lab nurse maintains records, including procedure time and method for every procedure. All patient records were retrospectively tracked through electronic medical record review. The primary outcome was procedure time and the secondary outcomes were complications and cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the patients' demographic data between the two groups. However, procedure time was significantly shorter in the Angiocath group than in the Micropuncture group (12.4 ± 3.5 vs 17.6 ± 6.9 min, p = 0.001); there were no serious complications, such as hemorrhage, pneumothorax, or hematoma, in both groups. Moreover, cost-effectiveness was better in the Angiocath group than in the Micropuncture group (0.34 vs 52 US$, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the Angiocath IV catheter can reduce procedure time and cost with no severe complications. Moreover, experienced practitioners can reduce the risk of complications when using Angiocath. There are several limitations to this study. First, it was retrospective; second, it was not randomized; and finally, it was conducted by only one experienced interventionalist.

Physical examination of the hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula to detect early dysfunction

The maintenance of vascular access patency for end-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis is necessary for survival. Many nephrologists, nurse practitioners, and nurses have limited experience with the physical examination of the arteriovenous fistula. In this review, we define key terms used in the assessment of an arteriovenous fistula. We discuss the arteriovenous fistula physical exam, including details of inspection, palpation, and auscultation. Using these concepts, we review the abnormal findings that can assist practitioners in determining the location of a stenosis. We review the existing literature that validates physical exam findings with gold standard tests such as ultrasound and angiography. Finally, we review data supporting the value of training physicians and nurses in arteriovenous fistula physical examination.

Structured physical assessment of arteriovenous fistulae in haemodialysis access surveillance: A missed opportunity?

Introduction:

Arteriovenous fistulae remain the gold standard of vascular access in haemodialysis. There is currently no consensus on standardised methods of monitoring arteriovenous fistulae. Assessment techniques and practice remain widely variable. The purpose of this study is to determine whether existing evidence supports physical assessment as an effective tool and a good predictor of arteriovenous fistulae dysfunction to allow for timely intervention and improve outcomes.

Methods:

A literature search was performed using CINAHL, PubMed, Medline and BNI databases and relevant search terms. Studies included were peer-reviewed, published after 2008, in English and related to arteriovenous fistulae only. Six key papers were identified and critically analysed for validity and relevance, in relation to outcomes, assessor experience, training duration and nurses’ ability to perform physical assessment.

Results:

Physical assessment has been shown to be effective in detecting arteriovenous fistulae dysfunction and comparable to technology-based surveillance. Physical assessment techniques generally adopt a ‘look, listen and feel’ approach to identify arteriovenous fistulae dysfunction that includes stenosis, thrombosis, ischaemia and infections. Physical assessment is a skill that can be taught with studies showing that skill-specific training is more effective than experience alone. Cost-effectiveness analysis is lacking.

Conclusion:

The analysis of evidence demonstrates that physical assessment of arteriovenous fistulae is an effective method of detecting arteriovenous fistulae dysfunction and is a skill that can be taught. A structured physical assessment and its implementation may be significant in routine care, but research into the most effective physical assessment techniques and its impact on clinical practice in haemodialysis is required.

Arteriovenous Access Failure, Stenosis, and Thrombosis

Vascular access–related complications can lead to patient morbidity and reduced patient quality of life. Some of the common arteriovenous access complications include failure to mature, stenosis formation, and thrombosis.

Use of a proactive duplex ultrasound protocol for hemodialysis access

OBJECTIVE

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation is the preferred approach for hemodialysis access; however, the maturation of AVFs is known to be poor. We established a proactive early duplex ultrasound (DUS) surveillance protocol for evaluating AVFs before attempted access. This study determined the effect of this protocol related to improving AVF maturation.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2013, 153 patients received new upper extremity AVFs and an early DUS surveillance protocol at a single academic institution. The protocol involved an early DUS evaluation before hemodialysis cannulation of the AVF at 4 to 8 weeks after AVF creation. A positive DUS result was identified as a peak systolic velocity of >375 cm/s or a >50% stenosis on gray scale imaging, along with decreased velocity in the outflow vein. Patients with positive DUS findings underwent prophylactic endovascular or open intervention to assist with AVF maturation. Nature of secondary interventions, as well as AVF patency and maturation, were assessed. Overall clinical outcomes and fistula patency were investigated.

RESULTS

During the study period, 183 upper extremity AVFs were created in 153 patients, including 82 radiocephalic, 63 brachiocephalic, and 38 brachiobasilic AVFs. A mortality rate of 43% (n = 66) was observed in a median follow-up period of 34.5 months (interquartile range, 19.6-46.9). A total of 164 early DUS were performed at a median of 6 weeks (interquartile range, 3.4-9.6 weeks) after the initial creation. Early DUS showed nine AVFs were occluded and were excluded from further analysis. Hemodynamically significant lesions were found in 62 AVFs (40%); however, only 17 (11%) were associated with an abnormal physical examination. Positive DUS finding prompted a secondary intervention in 81% of the patients. Among those with positive early DUS findings, AVF maturation was 70% in those undergoing a secondary intervention compared with 25% in those not undergoing a prophylactic intervention (P = .011). Primary-assisted patency for AVFs with early positive and negative DUS findings were 83% and 96% at 6 months, 64% and 89% at 1 year, and 52% and 82% at 2 years, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early DUS surveillance of AVFs before initial access is reasonable to identify problematic AVFs that may not be reliably detected on clinical examination. Although DUS criteria for AVFs have yet to be universally accepted, proactive early postoperative DUS interrogation assists in the early detection of dysfunctional AVFs and improvement of fistula maturation. Despite improved patency in those with positive DUS findings who undergo prophylactic secondary intervention, overall patency remains inferior to those without an abnormality detected on early DUS imaging.

Performance of physical examination versus ultrasonography to detect stenosis in haemodialysis arteriovenous fistula

Purpose

The overall purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of physical examination (PE) versus ultrasonography (US) in people with arteriovenous fistula (AVF).

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study with a total of 99 patients attended by the vascular radiology unit for AVF evaluation during January - March 2015. PE and ultrasonography were blinded performed by different radiologists. For complete and individual signs of PE, sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive (PPV) and negative (PNV) value, likelihood ratios (LR) and Cohen's κ value were measured.

Results

According to ultrasonography, the presence of stenosis was identified in 57 (58%) patients, and 61 (62%) by PE. The accuracy of PE for the diagnosis of AVF was sensitivity 82%, specificity 67%, PPV 77%, NPV 74%, LR 2.74 and 0.26. There was a moderate agreement beyond chance between PE and ultrasonography (κ = 0.5).

Conclusions

PE has shown a moderate accuracy to detect stenosis. With non-ultrasonography availability Haemodialysis Units can get benefit to optimize VA survival and professionals should improve its basic skills.

Monitoring and Surveillance of Hemodialysis Vascular Access Using StenTec and Physical Exam

Hemodialysis vascular access surveillance for hemodynamically significant stenosis can be a challenge because no universal gold standard exists. The StenTec Gauge measures static intra-access peak pressure and graphically displays the ratio of this pressure to systemic systolic (peak) arterial pressure (PIA ratio). In combination with careful physical exam (PE), the StenTec Gauge is an acceptable and cost-effective way of detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis in arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) or grafts (AVG). In a selected population of 21 hemodialysis patients with mature arteriovenous access, a StenTec reading and physical examination was measured on a weekly basis. Interventional procedures for suspected access dysfunction were performed if there was a greater than 25% increase of the PIA ratio from baseline in two consecutive readings, along with correlating clinical suspicion from physical examination findings. StenTec independently had a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of 99% in detecting clinically significant stenosis. PE alone had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 100%. StenTec combined with PE had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99% for predicting hemodynamically significant stenosis. StenTec detected 4 of 10 patients who had a PIA ratio value of ≥0.5, which correlates with current National Kidney Foundation Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) criteria for mean intra-access pressure ratios indicating a clinically significant outflow stenosis. PE predicted 9 of 10 patients with stenosis, and the combination of StenTec and PE predicted all 10 patients with clinically significant stenosis using the KDOQI criteria for PIA ratio. Hemodynamically significant access stenosis can be detected with excellent accuracy using both StenTec and PE measurements combined for monitoring and surveillance methods.

The rise and fall of access blood flow surveillance in arteriovenous fistulas

Vascular access blood flow (Qa) surveillance has been described as a typical false paradigm, an example of how new tests are sometimes adopted even without good-quality evidence of their benefits. This may be true for grafts, but not necessarily for arteriovenous fistulas. We reviewed the literature on Qa surveillance in fistulas to see whether it complies with the World Health Organization's criteria for screening tests. Measuring Qa has a fairly good reproducibility. Qa shows an excellent-to-good accuracy for stenosis being the only bedside screening test that achieves a very high sensitivity while retaining a fair-to-good positive predictive value for Qa thresholds of 600 ml/minute or higher associated with a >25% drop in Qa, or findings suggesting stenosis on physical examination. The accuracy of Qa in predicting thrombosis is hard to establish because of the heterogeneity of published studies, though a Qa of 300 ml/minute seems the most reliable cutoff. Qa surveillance affords a significant 2- to 3-fold reduction in the risk of thrombosis by comparison with clinical monitoring alone when Qa criteria highly sensitive to stenosis are considered, regardless of the study design (randomized controlled trials, cohort studies with concurrent or historic controls). Using highly sensitive Qa screening criteria also halves the risk of access loss, although this effect is not statistically significant. Our analysis strongly suggests that Qa surveillance is an effective method for screening mature fistulas, though further, appropriately designed studies are needed to fully elucidate its benefits and cost effectiveness.

Monitoring Dialysis Arteriovenous Fistulae: It's in our Hands

Vascular access problems are a daily occurrence in hemodialysis units. Loss of patency of the vascular access limits hemodialysis delivery and may result in underdialysis that leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Despite the known superiority of autogenous fistulae over grafts, autogenous fistulae also suffer from frequent development of stenosis and subsequent thrombosis. International guidelines recommend programmes for detection of stenosis and consequent correction in an attempt to reduce the rate of thrombosis. Physical examination of autogenous fistulae has recently been revisited as an important element in the assessment of stenotic lesions. Prospective observational studies have consistently demonstrated that physical examination performed by trained physicians is an accurate method for the diagnosis of fistula stenosis and, therefore, should be part of all surveillance protocols of the vascular access. However, to optimize hemodialysis access surveillance, hemodialysis practitioners may need to improve their skills in performing physical examination. The purpose of this article is to review the basics and drawbacks of physical examination for dialysis arteriovenous fistulae and to provide the reader with its diagnostic accuracy in the detection of arteriovenous fistula dysfunction, based on current published literature.

Education in vascular access

The successful creation and use of an arteriovenous vascular access (VA) requires a coordinated, educated multidisciplinary team to ensure an optimal VA for each patient. Patient education programs on VA are associated with increased arteriovenous VA use at dialysis initiation. Education should be tailored to patient goals and preferences with the understanding that experiential education from patient to patient is far more influential than that provided by the healthcare professional. VA education for the nephrologist should focus on addressing the systematic and patient-level barriers in achieving a functional VA, with specific components relating to VA creation, maturation, and cannulation that consider patient goals and preferences. A deficit in nursing skills in the area of assessment and cannulation can have devastating consequences for hemodialysis patients. Delivery of an integrated education program increases nurses' knowledge of VA and development of simulation programs or constructs to assist in cannulation of the VA will greatly facilitate the much needed skill transfer. Adequate VA surgical training and experience are critical to the creation and outcomes of VA. Simulations can benefit nephrologists, dialysis nurses surgeons, and interventionalists though aiding in surgical creation, understanding of the physiology and anatomy of a dysfunctional VA, and practicing cannulation techniques. All future educational initiatives must emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary care to attain successful VA outcomes.

Diagnosis of arteriovenous fistula dysfunction

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dysfunction remains a major contributor to the morbidity and mortality of hemodialysis patients. The failure of a newly created AVF to mature and development of stenosis in an established AVF are two common clinical predicaments. The goal is to identify a dysfunctional AVF early enough to intervene in a timely manner to either assist with the maturation process or to prevent thrombosis. The currently available tools in our armamentarium include clinical evaluation, physical examination of the AVF, and surveillance tests. Physical examination has been recognized as a simple and cost-effective tool, but is often not implemented either because of lack of training or time constraints. Surveillance tests include measurement of access flow or pressure as a surrogate marker of AVF dysfunction. Surveillance tests often require expensive equipment, additional personnel, and are controversial. Currently, there are guidelines and recommendations to include all of these measures while evaluating an AVF. Implementing judicious use of these tools in clinical practice can facilitate early diagnosis for timely intervention in the appropriate population. Furthermore, this strategy may avoid unnecessary interventions and assist with healthcare cost containment.

Improved cumulative survival in fistulas requiring surgical interventions to promote fistula maturation compared with endovascular interventions

Due to high nonmaturation rates, arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) frequently require intervention(s) to promote maturation. Endovascular or surgical interventions are often undertaken to salvage nonmaturing AVFs. The objective of this study was to compare the impact of surgical versus endovascular interventions to promote AVF maturation on cumulative AVF survival. We evaluated 89 patients with new AVF placement from a Veterans Affairs population over a 5-year period. Of these, 46 (52%) required intervention(s) to achieve successful maturation for dialysis: 31 patients had surgical revisions and 15 patients had endovascular repairs. We compared cumulative survival between AVFs requiring no intervention, surgical revision, and endovascular intervention to promote AVF maturation. Cumulative survival was longer in AVFs receiving surgical intervention compared with angioplasty to promote AVF maturation (p = 0.05). One-year cumulative survival was 86% vs. 83% vs. 40% for no intervention vs. surgery vs. angioplasty, respectively. In AVFs that required interventions to promote maturation, AVFs with surgical intervention had longer cumulative survival compared with those AVFs with endovascular intervention. AVFs with surgical intervention to promote maturation had similar 1-year cumulative survival to those AVFs that did not require intervention to promote maturation.

Vascular access surveillance: an ongoing controversy

Hemodialysis vascular access surveillance continues to be widely recommended despite ongoing controversy as to its benefit in prolonging access patency compared with clinical monitoring alone. The most common screening tests are access blood flow and dialysis venous pressure measurements. When surveillance test results cross a predetermined threshold, accesses are referred for intervention with correction of stenosis to reduce future thrombosis and prolong access survival. Current surveillance strategies have four components: (1) underlying condition; (2) screening test; (3) intervention; and (4) outcomes. However, limitations exist within each component that may prevent achieving the desired outcomes. This review discusses these limitations and their consequences. To date, randomized controlled trials have not consistently shown that surveillance improves outcomes in grafts, and there is limited evidence that surveillance reduces thrombosis without prolonging the life of native fistulae. In conclusion, current evidence does not support the concept that all accesses should undergo routine surveillance with intervention.

Surveillance of hemodialysis vascular access

A mature, functional arteriovenous (AV) access is the lifeline for a hemodialysis (HD) patient as it provides sufficient enough blood flow for adequate dialysis. As the chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population is expanding, and because of the well-recognized hazardous complications of dialysis catheters, the projected placement and use of AV accesses for HD is on the rise. Although a superior access than catheters, AV accesses are not without complications. The primary complication that causes AV accesses to fail is stenosis with subsequent thrombosis. Surveying for stenosis can be performed in a variety of ways. Clinical monitoring, measuring flow, determining pressure, and measuring recirculation are all methods that show promise. In addition, stenosis can be directly visualized, through noninvasive techniques such as color duplex imaging, or through minimally invasive venography. Each method of screening has its advantages and disadvantages, and several studies exist which attempt to answer the question of which test is the most useful. Ultimately, to maintain the functionality of the access for the HD patient, a team approach becomes imperative. The collaboration and cooperation of the patient, nephrologist, dialysis nurse and technician, vascular access coordinator, interventionalist, and vascular surgeon is necessary to preserve this lifeline.

In search of an optimal bedside screening program for arteriovenous fistula stenosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Guidelines recommend systematically screening for stenosis using various methods, but no studies so far have compared all of the options. A prospective blinded study was performed to compare the performance of several bedside tests performed during dialysis in diagnosing angiographically proven >50% fistula stenosis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

In an unselected population of 119 hemodialysis patients with mature fistulas, physical examination (PE) was conducted; dynamic and derived static venous pressure (VAPR), blood pump flow/arterial pressure (Qb/AP) ratio, recirculation (R), and access blood flow (Qa) were measured; and angiography was performed.

RESULTS

Angiography identified 59 stenotic fistulas: 43 stenoses were located upstream from the venous needle (inflow stenosis), 12 were located downstream (outflow stenosis), and 4 were located at both sites. The optimal tests for identifying an inflow stenosis were Qa < 650 ml/min and the combination of a positive PE "or" Qa < 650 ml/min (accuracy 80% and 81%, respectively), the latter being preferable because it was more sensitive (85% versus 65%, respectively) for a comparable specificity (79% versus 89%, respectively). The best tests for identifying outflow stenosis were PE and VAPR, with no difference between the two (accuracy 91% and 85%, sensitivity 75% and 81%, specificity 93% and 86%, respectively), the former being preferable because it was more reproducible, easier to perform, and applicable to all fistulas.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that fistula stenosis can be detected and located during dialysis with a moderate-to-excellent accuracy using PE and Qa measurement as screening procedures.

An interesting case: retrograde blood flow from a LIMA sustaining hemodialysis via an AVF

A case is described in which the inflow of a left radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula was being maintained by retrograde flow from a patent left internal mammary artery bypass graft, distal to a severe left subclavian artery stenosis. The clinical manifestations of this phenomenon were angina, lateral chest wall pain during dialysis, and distal hypoperfusion of the left hand. After stenting of the subclavian lesion, all symptoms resolved.

Autologous arteriovenous fistula creation by nephrologists

In 1966, physicians from the Bronx Veterans Administration Hospital, New York City described the surgical creation of a distal radial artery to cephalic vein AV fistula. This novel configuration, for the first time, allowed effective and reproducible cannulation for hemodialysis access and has remained the gold standard for hemodialysis access since. More than 40 years later, vascular access remains the Achilles' heel of hemodialysis therapy. In this article, we will review the outcomes and techniques of the pre-eminent nephrologist-surgeons from around the world in an attempt to define those elements that are necessary for successful autologous fistula creation. The hope is that these elements may be employed by others in an effort to increase the numbers and durability of autologous fistulae in incident and prevalent hemodialysis patients, particularly in the United States.