Infection Rate of Spinal Cord Stimulators After a Screening Trial Period. A 53-Month Third Party Follow-up

ASRA Pain Medicine consensus practice infection control guidelines for regional anesthesia and pain medicine

BACKGROUND

To provide recommendations on risk mitigation, diagnosis and treatment of infectious complications associated with the practice of regional anesthesia, acute and chronic pain management.

METHODS

Following board approval, in 2020 the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA Pain Medicine) commissioned evidence-based guidelines for best practices for infection control. More than 80 research questions were developed and literature searches undertaken by assigned working groups comprising four to five members. Modified US Preventive Services Task Force criteria were used to determine levels of evidence and certainty. Using a modified Delphi method, >50% agreement was needed to accept a recommendation for author review, and >75% agreement for a recommendation to be accepted. The ASRA Pain Medicine Board of Directors reviewed and approved the final guidelines.

RESULTS

After documenting the incidence and infectious complications associated with regional anesthesia and interventional pain procedures including implanted devices, we made recommendations regarding the role of the anesthesiologist and pain physician in infection control, preoperative patient risk factors and management, sterile technique, equipment use and maintenance, healthcare setting (office, hospital, operating room), surgical technique, postoperative risk reduction, and infection symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment. Consensus recommendations were based on risks associated with different settings and procedures, and keeping in mind each patient's unique characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommendations are intended to be multidisciplinary guidelines for clinical care and clinical decision-making in the regional anesthesia and chronic interventional pain practice. The issues addressed are constantly evolving, therefore, consistent updating will be required.

The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)®: Recommendations for the Mitigation of Complications of Neurostimulation

INTRODUCTION

The International Neuromodulation Society convened a multispecialty group of physicians based on expertise and international representation to establish evidence-based guidance on the mitigation of neuromodulation complications. This Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)® project intends to update evidence-based guidance and offer expert opinion that will improve efficacy and safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Authors were chosen on the basis of their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches of MEDLINE, BioMed Central, Current Contents Connect, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed from 2017 (when NACC last published guidelines) to October 2023. Identified studies were graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations are based on the strength of evidence or consensus when evidence was scant.

RESULTS

The NACC examined the published literature and established evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to guide best practices. Additional guidance will occur as new evidence is developed in future iterations of this process.

CONCLUSIONS

The NACC recommends best practices regarding the mitigation of complications associated with neurostimulation to improve safety and efficacy. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations should be used as a guide to assist decision-making when clinically appropriate.

Sonication in Patients With Spinal Cord Stimulation: A New Approach for Infection Diagnostics

INTRODUCTION

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) offers improvement in pain and function for several chronic pain conditions. There are concerns regarding bacterial colonization of the temporary lead extensions and subsequent infection risk in a two-session implantation procedure. Although there is no standardized evaluation of SCS lead contamination, this study evaluates the infection rate and microbial colonization of SCS lead extensions with sonication, a method that is established in implant-related infection diagnostics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective observational study comprised 32 patients with a two-stage SCS implantation procedure. Microbial colonization of the lead extensions was assessed with sonication. The presence of organisms in the subcutaneous tissue was evaluated separately. Surgical-site infections were recorded. Patient demographics and risk factors including diabetes, tobacco use, obesity, trial length, and infection parameters in serum were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 55 years. On average, the trial length was 13 days. In seven cases (21.9%), a microbial lead colonization was found with sonication. In contrast, there was one positive culture (3.1%) from the subcutaneous tissue samples. The C-reactive protein and leukocyte count remained at the preoperative level. One early surgical-site infection (3.1%) occurred. No other late infections occurred six months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a discrepancy between the presence of microbial colonization and the occurrence of clinically relevant infections. Although the rate of microbial colonization of the lead extensions is high (21.9%), the surgical-site infection rate remained low (3.1%). Therefore, we can conclude that the two-session procedure is a safe approach that is not associated with a higher incidence of infection. Although the sonication method cannot be used as the sole tool for detecting infections in patients with SCS, it can provide additional value in microbial diagnostics in combination with clinical and laboratory parameters and conventional microbiological methods.

Epidural spread of surgical site infection from spinal cord stimulation trial

We present a case of deep surgical site infection (SSI) at a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial implantation site, resulting from an allergic reaction to an unknown agent. A 38-year-old female with complex regional pain syndrome began an SCS trial, noting 100% pain relief for 5 days. Fluid drainage from the surgical site was reported on POD6 and trial leads were removed the following day. The patient was hospitalized with sepsis. Blood cultures revealed Staphylococcus aureus. MRIs showed skin breakdown and cellulitis of the paraspinal musculature extending into the epidural space. The patient was maintained with antibiotics and rigorous wound care for 9 days and the surgical site infection resolved. The patient proceeded to SCS implantation, and reported good pain relief with the implanted device.

Role of patient selection and trial stimulation for spinal cord stimulation therapy for chronic non-cancer pain: a comprehensive narrative review

Background/importance

Patient selection for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy is crucial and is traditionally performed with clinical selection followed by a screening trial. The factors influencing patient selection and the importance of trialing have not been systematically evaluated.

Objective

We report a narrative review conducted to synthesize evidence regarding patient selection and the role of SCS trials.

Evidence review

Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for reports (any design) of SCS in adult patients, from their inception until March 30, 2022. Study selection and data extraction were carried out using DistillerSR. Data were organized into tables and narrative summaries, categorized by study design. Importance of patient variables and trialing was considered by looking at their influence on the long-term therapy success.

Findings

Among 7321 citations, 201 reports consisting of 60 systematic reviews, 36 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 41 observational studies (OSs), 51 registry-based reports, and 13 case reports on complications during trialing were included. Based on RCTs and OSs, the median trial success rate was 72% and 82%, and therapy success was 65% and 61% at 12 months, respectively. Although several psychological and non-psychological determinants have been investigated, studies do not report a consistent approach to patient selection. Among psychological factors, untreated depression was associated with poor long-term outcomes, but the effect of others was inconsistent. Most RCTs except for chronic angina involved trialing and only one RCT compared patient selection with or without trial. The median (range) trial duration was 10 (0–30) and 7 (0–56) days among RCTs and OSs, respectively.

Conclusions

Due to lack of a consistent approach to identify responders for SCS therapy, trialing complements patient selection to exclude patients who do not find the therapy helpful and/or intolerant of the SCS system. However, more rigorous and large studies are necessary to better evaluate its role.

Cervical spinal cord stimulator trial complicated by epidural abscess

Back ground

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a growing interventional treatment modality in patients experiencing intractable pain refractory to conservative treatments. Many patients with chronic low back and leg pain that persists after surgery have found pain relief, and more evidence is suggesting that chronic upper limb and neck pain may respond just as well to this therapy. However, the placement of foreign body, for instance SCS leads, in the epidural space can become the source for deep intra-spinal infection.

Case report

We present a 49-year-old robust male who underwent a temporary cervical SCS trial and was diagnosed with epidural abscess on the day 9 when the leads were pulled. The trial phase was complicated by immediate and prolonged post procedure pain. The diagnosis of epidural abscess was made soon after clinical presentation with no neurological deficits or escalation in pain but new onset fever. He made a complete recovery after extensive laminectomy and antibiotic treatment.

Conclusion

The decision to extend the SCS trial length poses a question of risk versus benefit in regards to potential infectious complications versus pain relief. Continuing antibiotic therapy during a SCS trial phase is a possible strategy but of uncertain benefit.

Categories

Anesthesiology, Pain Management.

Factfinders for patient safety: Antibiotics for disc access and spinal cord stimulation trials

This series of FactFinders presents a brief summary of the evidence and outlines recommendations regarding the use of antibiotics for disc access and spinal cord stimulation trials. The evidence in support of the following facts is presented: (1) There is a low but nonzero risk of discitis due to percutaneous intervertebral disc access. Strategies to mitigate this risk include use of strict aseptic technique, use of a needle stylet, and prophylactic intravenous or intra-discal antibiotics. (2) In low-risk patients, it may not be necessary to continue antibiotics throughout the percutaneous or staged trial period; however, in high-risk patients, or in trials lasting more than five days, antibiotics should be considered on a case-by-case basis.

A Comprehensive Review of Spinal Cord Stimulator Infections

Spinal cord stimulator (SCS) is approved to treat various pain conditions and is commonly seen in the chronic pain patient population. Due to the nature of the device and its location, infections associated with SCS have a particularly high morbidity. According to post-market data and medical device reports, 87% of patients receiving SCS implants were given perioperative antibiotics as the implantable neurostimulator or receiver pocket serve as the most common sites of infection. The most common antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis given are first-generation cephalosporins (cefalexin, cefazolin) at the time of implantation. If deep infection is suspected, imaging in the form of CT scan should be obtained as physical exam is not always sufficient. For infections involving the epidural space, vertebra, or intervertebral discs, MRI is the preferred imaging modality. If meningitis is suspected, a lumbar puncture is recommended. Positive cultures can help guide antibiotic therapy.

Antibiotics for Spinal Cord Stimulation Trials and Implants: A Survey Analysis of Practice Patterns

Background

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment modality for neuropathic pain. Published guidelines exist to aid physicians in proper antibiotic use during and after spinal cord stimulation trials and implants. In this brief review, we present and analyze the current antibiotic practice patterns of clinicians.

Methods

The study protocol was reviewed and granted an exemption by an Institutional Review Board. The survey queried practice parameters in regards to spinal cord stimulation therapy. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) and Society of Interventional Spine (SIS) distributed the survey to their active members by emails with a web link to the survey.

Results

Our results indicate that 82% and 69% of physicians do not utilize nasal swabs for methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), respectively, prior to SCS trial and implantation. During trials, 47% providers administer a single dose of antibiotics, 35% administer antibiotics for the duration of the trial, and 17% do not administer antibiotics. During implantation, 44% of physicians administer a single dose during the procedure, 11% administer antibiotics up to 24 hours, 24% administer antibiotics between 3-5 days, 14% administer antibiotics for more than 5 days, and 4% do not administer antibiotics.

Conclusions

Our study suggests a portion of pain physicians do not adhere to the Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) guidelines in regards to antibiotic administration for SCS trial and implantation. Further analysis and surveys would allow insight into common practices. More information and education would be beneficial to optimize peri-procedure antibiotic use to reduce infection risk and decrease antimicrobial resistance.

Machine Learning Algorithms Provide Greater Prediction of Response to SCS Than Lead Screening Trial: A Predictive AI-Based Multicenter Study

Persistent pain after spinal surgery can be successfully addressed by spinal cord stimulation (SCS). International guidelines strongly recommend that a lead trial be performed before any permanent implantation. Recent clinical data highlight some major limitations of this approach. First, it appears that patient outco mes, with or without lead trial, are similar. In contrast, during trialing, infection rate drops drastically within time and can compromise the therapy. Using composite pain assessment experience and previous research, we hypothesized that machine learning models could be robust screening tools and reliable predictors of long-term SCS efficacy. We developed several algorithms including logistic regression, regularized logistic regression (RLR), naive Bayes classifier, artificial neural networks, random forest and gradient-boosted trees to test this hypothesis and to perform internal and external validations, the objective being to confront model predictions with lead trial results using a 1-year composite outcome from 103 patients. While almost all models have demonstrated superiority on lead trialing, the RLR model appears to represent the best compromise between complexity and interpretability in the prediction of SCS efficacy. These results underscore the need to use AI-based predictive medicine, as a synergistic mathematical approach, aimed at helping implanters to optimize their clinical choices on daily practice.

Spinal Cord Stimulation via Percutaneous and Open Implantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Examining Complication Rates

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has become a successful therapeutic option for combating chronic pain and can be implanted via percutaneous or open (laminotomy/laminectomy) techniques. This study aimed to systematically review the complications that occur after SCS placement via percutaneous and open (laminotomy/laminectomy) in failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), and chronic back (lumbosacral)/leg pain.

METHODS

The PubMed and Embase databases were searched from inception to June 2020; prospective studies using SCS in patients with FBSS, CRPS, and chronic low back pain that reported both complications and the implantation method used were included. Effects and results from each study were combined using a random-effects model and were structured for subgroup analysis between open implantation and percutaneous implantation. Meta-regression was performed by calculating a mean difference and weighted by inverse variance and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Using several different patient- and event-based metrics, our meta-analysis revealed an overall average complication rate of 21.1% (95% CI, 14.9-27.2). Equipment, technical, and medical complications occurred at rates of 12.1%, 1.1%, and 6.3%, respectively. Lead migration and infection rates were 5.6% and 3.8%, respectively. When comparing the 2 implant techniques, medical-related surgical reinterventions and explants due to infection were more common in open compared with percutaneous SCS procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Equipment-related complications accounted for the majority of SCS complications. Percutaneous SCS resulted in less reintervention and fewer explants caused by medical-related complications and infection, respectively. These conclusions may provide a general understanding of the SCS complications profile for physicians who care for SCS patients.

Spinal Cord Stimulator Infection: Approach to Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the most utilized invasive electrical neuromodulation treatment for the management of refractory chronic pain syndromes. Infection is one of the most dreaded complications related to SCS implantation and may prevent patients from receiving adequate pain treatment, adding to the initial cost and disability. Most SCS infections present as generator pocket infection. However, delay in diagnosis may lead to complications such as meningitis, epidural abscess, and/or vertebral osteomyelitis. Early recognition of SCS-related infections and associated complications is based on clinical suspicion, laboratory testing, and appropriate diagnostic imaging. While superficial surgical site infection following SCS implant may be treated with antibiotic therapy alone, deep infection involving implant warrants device removal to achieve cure. Duration of antimicrobial therapy depends on severity of clinical presentation and presence or absence of associated complications. Several preventive strategies can be incorporated in surgical practice to reduce the risk of SCS infection.

Postoperative Infections Associated With Prolonged Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial Duration (PROMISE RCT)

Introduction

In the PROMISE study, a multinational randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with multicolumn surgical leads as a treatment of low back pain, clinicians followed their usual practice. An early, unplanned safety analysis revealed that the infection rate in Belgium (5/23), where trial duration was a median 21.5 days, was significantly higher than the 1/64 rate observed in the other study countries (median 5.8 days, p < 0.01). This report reviews infections observed in the PROMISE study after study completion.

Materials and Methods

For all infections related to SCS, we used descriptive statistics and tests of independent variables to analyze potentially contributing factors (age, sex, coexisting medical conditions, tobacco use, lead type, and trial duration) between subjects with infections versus those without. Cumulative incidence curves were created using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between the two strata using a log‐rank test.

Results

Among nine (5.2%) infections in 174 subjects trialed, the only significant contributing factor to infection was trial duration: median 21 days (range 3–56) for those with infection vs. six days (1–41) for those without (p = 0.001; Wilcoxon rank‐sum test). The cumulative incidence of infection for subjects trialed >10 days was 24.1% vs. 1.4% for subjects trialed ≤10 days (p < 0.001). After the protocol was amended to limit trial duration to 10 days, 14 infection‐free trials were performed in Belgium.

Conclusions

Although not part of the preplanned analysis, our observation supports the hypothesis of a cause‐effect relationship between trial duration and the risk of infection and the conclusion that prolonged SCS trials should be avoided.

Root cause analysis of epidural spinal cord stimulator implant infections with resolution after implementation of an improved protocol for surgical placement

Background

Placing a spinal stimulator for the purpose of restoring paralysed function is a novel procedure; however, paralysis predisposes people to infection. Preventing surgical site infections is critical to benefit this population.

Objective

The objective of this study was to review the root cause analysis of postoperative wound infections by a hospital epidemiology team following implantation of epidural spinal cord neurostimulators in patients with chronic spinal cord injury.

Methods

A team was assembled to review the case of every individual who had been enrolled to receive a neurostimulator at the facility. A root cause analysis was performed evaluating five categories: the patient; equipment; facility/environment; procedure; and personnel.

Findings

The root cause analysis included 11 patients. Two patients became infected. Three others dehisced their wound without becoming infected. All patients were given preoperative antibiotics on time. A mean of 17 personnel were in the operating room during surgery. Vancomycin powder was used in the patients who either dehisced their wound or became infected.

Conclusions

The root cause analysis provides guidance for other institutions performing the same novel procedure. This analysis did not reveal a direct association, but did generate several areas for improvement including increasing pre-surgical screening, cleaning transient equipment (e.g., computer screens), limiting traffic in the operating room, using new sterile instruments for each stage of the procedure, not reopening the back incision, not applying vancomycin powder, and using an antimicrobial envelope for the stimulator.

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain: Current Trends and Future Applications

The origin and the neural pathways involved in chronic neuropathic pain are still not extensively understood. For this reason, despite the wide variety of pain medications available on the market, neuropathic pain is challenging to treat. The present therapeutic alternative considered as the gold standard for many kinds of chronic neuropathic pain is epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Despite its proved efficacy, the favourable cost-effectiveness when compared to the long-term use of poorly effective drugs and the expanding array of indications and technical improvements, SCS is still worldwide largely neglected by general practitioners, neurologists, neurosurgeons and pain therapists, often bringing to a large delay in considering as a therapeutic option for patients affected by neuropathic chronic pain. The present state of the art of SCS in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain is here overviewed and speculations on whether to use a trial period or direct implant, to choose between percutaneous leads or paddle electrodes and on the pros and cons of the different patterns of stimulation presently available on the market (tonic stim, high-frequency stim and burst stim) are described.

Spinal Cord Stimulation, MILD Procedure, and Regenerative Medicine, Novel Interventional Nonopioid Therapies in Chronic Pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic pain is a highly prevalent condition affecting millions of individuals.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, newer treatments have emerged that are changing the way clinicians treat pain pathogenesis, including novel nonopioid strategies. In this regard, spinal cord stimulation, the MILD procedure, and regenerative medicine have shown promise. This review summarizes recent literature on these three emerging treatment strategies. The results of this review suggest that under certain conditions, spinal cord stimulation, the MILD procedure, and regenerative medicine can be effective treatment modalities.

Biplanar Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Lead Implantation for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Technical Note

INTRODUCTION

The correct positioning of spinal cord stimulator leads is assessed radiographically during their percutaneous implantation for trial stimulation. Usually the C-arm is repositioned several times to allow imaging in different planes, which may extend the total duration of surgery. The study aimed to evaluate whether the concurrent intraoperative use of 2 C-arms could safely reduce the duration of surgery.

MATERIALS

This retrospective study included cases of percutaneous implantation of a spinal cord stimulation (SCS) lead for trial neurostimulation between 2006 and 2011. The duration of the surgical intervention was recorded, along with the duration of the preparation stage in the operating room. In addition, total radiation exposure time per case was recorded.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients underwent percutaneous implantation of an SCS lead (72 thoracolumbar, 22 cervical). In 73 cases 2 C-arms were used, with 21 cases performed with a single C-arm. In both the cervical and thoracolumbar groups, a biplanar configuration was associated with significant reduction in the mean length of the surgical phase, by 29 minutes (P = 0.017) and 14 minutes, respectively (P = 0.016), albeit while increasing the duration of the preoperative preparation stage. There was no significant difference in the total duration in the operating room or in the total radiation exposure time between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Here we present a technical note on the use of a biplanar fluoroscopy configuration for percutaneous implantation of SCS leads. This arrangement correlated with a reduction in surgery duration without increasing total radiation exposure, representing a practical and safe adjustment to current practice.

The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) Recommendations for Infection Prevention and Management

INTRODUCTION

The use of neurostimulation for pain has been an established therapy for many decades and is a major tool in the arsenal to treat neuropathic pain syndromes. Level I evidence has recently been presented to substantiate the therapy, but this is balanced against the risk of complications of an interventional technique.

METHODS

The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) of the International Neuromodulation Society convened an international panel of well published and diverse physicians to examine the best practices for infection mitigation and management in patients undergoing neurostimulation. The NACC recommendations are based on evidence scoring and peer-reviewed literature. Where evidence is lacking the panel added expert opinion to establish recommendations.

RESULTS

The NACC has made recommendations to improve care by reducing infection and managing this complication when it occurs. These evidence-based recommendations should be considered best practices in the clinical implantation of neurostimulation devices.

CONCLUSION

Adhering to established standards can improve patient care and reduce the morbidity and mortality of infectious complications in patients receiving neurostimulation.

Microbiological Evaluation of the Extension Wire and Percutaneous Epidural Lead Anchor Site Following a "2-Stage Cut-Down" Spinal Cord Stimulator Procedure

OBJECTIVES

There are concerns regarding bacterial colonization of the temporary extension leads and subsequent infection risk using the 2-stage cut-down approach in spinal cord stimulation (SCS). We sought to quantify the extent of bacterial colonization of the temporary extension wire and percutaneous epidural lead anchor site.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional observational study recruiting a pragmatic sample of 25 consecutive patients listed for a cut-down trial of SCS. We excluded patients undergoing revision procedures and those who had previously received a spinal cord stimulator. The primary outcome measure was the rate and type of colonization of the extension wires and lead anchor site.

RESULTS

No surgical site infections were recorded in any of the patients and no late infections subsequent to insertion of the implantable pulse generator. Overall, 24% of patients grew organisms from the temporary extension wire. Five patients grew coagulase-negative Staphylococcus aureus, and 1 patient grew Enterococcus faecalis. There were no positive wound cultures from the anchor site of the epidural lead.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high colonization rate of the temporary extension wire, there were no surgical site infections. We conclude that provided appropriate strategies for the management of surgical site infections are implemented, the 2-stage cut-down procedure is a safe approach that is not associated with a higher incidence of infection.

Spinal cord stimulation: a review of the safety literature and proposal for perioperative evaluation and management

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There is currently no consensus on appropriate perioperative management of patients with spinal cord stimulator implants. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered safe under strict labeling conditions. Electrocautery is generally not recommended in these patients but sometimes used despite known risks.

PURPOSE

The aim was to discuss the perioperative evaluation and management of patients with spinal cord stimulator implants.

STUDY DESIGN

A literature review, summary of device labeling, and editorial were performed, regarding the safety of spinal cord stimulator devices in the perioperative setting.

METHODS

A literature review was performed, and the labeling of each Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved spinal cord stimulation system was reviewed. The literature review was performed using PubMed and the FDA website (www.fda.gov).

RESULTS

Magnetic resonance imaging safety recommendations vary between the models. Certain systems allow for MRI of the brain to be performed, and only one system allows for MRI of the body to be performed, both under strict labeling conditions. Before an MRI is performed, it is imperative to ascertain that the system is intact, without any lead breaks or low impedances, as these can result in heating of the spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and injury to the patient. Monopolar electrocautery is generally not recommended for patients with SCS; however, in some circumstances, it is used when deemed required by the surgeon. When cautery is necessary, bipolar electrocautery is recommended. Modern electrocautery units are to be used with caution as there remains a risk of thermal injury to the tissue in contact with the SCS. As with MRI, electrocautery usage in patients with SCS systems with suspected breaks or abnormal impedances is unsafe and may cause injury to the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal cord stimulation is increasingly used in patients with pain of spinal origin, particularly to manage postlaminectomy syndrome. Knowledge of the safety concerns of SCS and appropriate perioperative evaluation and management of the SCS system can reduce risks and improve surgical planning.

The appropriate use of neurostimulation: avoidance and treatment of complications of neurostimulation therapies for the treatment of chronic pain. Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee

INTRODUCTION

The International Neuromodulation Society (INS) has determined that there is a need for guidance regarding safety and risk reduction for implantable neurostimulation devices. The INS convened an international committee of experts in the field to explore the evidence and clinical experience regarding safety, risks, and steps to risk reduction to improve outcomes.

METHODS

The Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) reviewed the world literature in English by searching MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar to evaluate the evidence for ways to reduce risks of neurostimulation therapies. This evidence, obtained from the relevant literature, and clinical experience obtained from the convened consensus panel were used to make final recommendations on improving safety and reducing risks.

RESULTS

The NACC determined that the ability to reduce risk associated with the use of neurostimulation devices is a valuable goal and possible with best practice. The NACC has recommended several practice modifications that will lead to improved care. The NACC also sets out the minimum training standards necessary to become an implanting physician.

CONCLUSIONS

The NACC has identified the possibility of improving patient care and safety through practice modification. We recommend that all implanting physicians review this guidance and consider adapting their practice accordingly.

Effect of a novel fixation method for spinal cord stimulators

INTRODUCTION

Spinal cord stimulation is a well-established treatment for recalcitrant pain syndromes such as failed back surgery syndrome. Techniques minimizing surgical time and incision size and increasing lead stability are of great value to both the patient and implanting physician. We present a consecutive case series review of ten permanent percutaneous spinal cord implants utilizing a novel lead fixation device. The purpose of this case series review is to present initial findings of the minimized incision size and thoughts surrounding the new device and technique.

CASE SERIES REPORT

Ten cases were performed utilizing the new device (fiXate) and technique. Incision size was dictated by adequate visualization of the fascial stratum as well as technical working space required for lead fixation and redirection to the generator pocket. Each spinal cord stimulator lead was affixed to the thoracodorsal fascia utilizing the novel device.

DISCUSSION

In this consecutive series, the average midline incision size was 2.2 cm (range = 1.9-2.6 cm) which is greatly minimized through the use of the device. Not only may fiXate directly affect incision size, operating room and anesthesia time may also be lessened due to the semiautomated nature of the device. Of the cases performed, there were no complications or adverse events. Of note, there have been no reports of lead migrations during this case series, the average follow-up time being 18 weeks (range 11-26 weeks).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest a new method of fixation can be utilized for percutaneous spinal cord stimulation that allows a reduction in incision size. Intuitively, reduction in incision size is relevant with regard to tissue morbidity and may also have implications with regard to infection. Use of the device may also reduce operating room and anesthesia time as well as provide greater stability than standard suture.