Cytokine profiles in acute liver failure treated with albumin dialysis

Pediatric acute liver failure: Current perspective in etiology and management

Pediatric acute liver failure (PALF) is a catastrophic clinical condition with very high morbidity and mortality without early detection and intervention. It is characterized by the acute onset of massive hepatocellular injury that releases circulating inflammatory mediators, resulting in metabolic disturbances, coagulopathy, hepatic encephalopathy and multi-organ failure. The etiological spectrum is dominated by hepatotropic viruses, drug-induced liver injury, metabolic and genetic disorders and immune-mediated diseases. Unlike adults, indeterminate causes for acute liver failure constitute a considerable proportion of cases of acute liver failure in children in the west. The heterogeneity of age and etiology in PALF has led to difficulties in developing prognostic scoring. The recent guidelines emphasize prompt identification of PALF, age-appropriate evaluation for hepatic encephalopathy and laboratory evaluation with careful monitoring. Current therapy focuses on supporting the failing liver and other organs, pending either spontaneous recovery or liver transplantation. Targeted therapy is available for a select group of etiologies. Liver transplantation can be lifesaving and a plan for the same should be organized, whenever indicated. The aim of this review is to define PALF, understand its etiopathogenesis, address the challenges encountered during the management and update the latest advances in liver transplantation and non-transplant treatment options in PALF.

Artificial liver support in patients with liver failure: a modified DELPHI consensus of international experts

The present narrative review on albumin dialysis provides evidence-based and expert opinion guidelines for clinicians caring for adult patients with different types of liver failure. The review was prepared by an expert panel of 13 members with liver and ntensive care expertise in extracorporeal liver support therapies for the management of patients with liver failure. The coordinating committee developed the questions according to their importance in the management of patients with liver failure. For each indication, experts conducted a comprehensive review of the literature aiming to identify the best available evidence and assessed the quality of evidence based on the literature and their experience. Summary statements and expert's recommendations covered all indications of albumin dialysis therapy in patients with liver failure, timing and intensity of treatment, efficacy, technical issues related to the device and safety. The panel supports the data from the literature that albumin dialysis showed a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy, refractory pruritus, renal function, reduction of cholestasis and jaundice. However, the trials lacked to show a clear beneficial effect on overall survival. A short-term survival benefit at 15 and 21 days respectively in acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure has been reported in recent studies. The technique should be limited to patients with a transplant project, to centers experienced in the management of advanced liver disease. The use of extracorporeal albumin dialysis could be beneficial in selected patients with advanced liver diseases listed for transplant or with a transplant project. Waiting future large randomized controlled trials, this panel experts' statements may help careful patient selection and better treatment modalities.

Similarities, Differences, and Potential Synergies in the Mechanism of Action of Albumin Dialysis Using the MARS Albumin Dialysis Device and the CytoSorb Hemoperfusion Device in the Treatment of Liver Failure

INTRODUCTION

Liver failure is characterized by compromised hepatic detoxification, protein synthesis, and metabolic derangements leading to an accumulation of a broad spectrum of water-soluble and lipophilic toxins as well as immune system mediators. Exploring complex detoxification mechanisms to therapeutically target those components, this article will focus on similarities, differences, and potential synergies in the mechanism of albumin dialysis and hemoperfusion.

METHODS

An in vitro two-compartment model for the comparison of liver support techniques was used to compare MARS albumin dialysis modified with novel charcoal adsorbents to CytoSorb hemoperfusion with added hemodialysis for effects on marker molecule removal.

RESULTS

MARS and CytoSorb performed similar in the removal of water-soluble toxins. Ammonia removal was increased using CytoSorb. CytoSorb lead to a statistically significant reduction of albumin-bound toxins, total bilirubin and subfractions. Bile acid removal was comparable. MARS demonstrated no removal of cytokines interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), whereas CytoSorb allowed for near complete removal. Notably, CytoSorb displayed 50% of lipophilic substance and cytokine removal during the first hour of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Compared to MARS, CytoSorb hemoperfusion leads to an initially fast removal of cytokines, TNF-α and IL-6, as well as reduction of albumin-bound toxins such as indirect bilirubin and bile acids in our model. The initial removal is also associated with removal of albumin.

Artificial liver support systems: what is new over the last decade?

The liver is a complex organ that performs vital functions of synthesis, heat production, detoxification and regulation; its failure carries a highly critical risk. At the end of the last century, some artificial liver devices began to develop with the aim of being used as supportive therapy until liver transplantation (bridge-to-transplant) or liver regeneration (bridge-to-recovery). The well-recognized devices are the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System™ (MARS™), the Single-Pass Albumin Dialysis system and the Fractionated Plasma Separation and Adsorption system (Prometheus™). In the following years, experimental works and early clinical applications were reported, and to date, many thousands of patients have already been treated with these devices. The ability of artificial liver support systems to replace the liver detoxification function, at least partially, has been proven, and the correction of various biochemical parameters has been demonstrated. However, the complex tasks of regulation and synthesis must be addressed through the use of bioartificial systems, which still face several developmental problems and very high production costs. Moreover, clinical data on improved survival are conflicting. This paper reviews the progress achieved and new data published on artificial liver support systems over the past decade and the prospects for these devices.

Molecular adsorbent recirculating system and single-pass albumin dialysis in liver failure--a prospective, randomised crossover study

Background

The aim of extracorporeal albumin dialysis (ECAD) is to reduce endogenous toxins accumulating in liver failure. To date, ECAD is conducted mainly with the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS). However, single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD) has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the two devices with a prospective, single-centre, non-inferiority crossover study design with particular focus on reduction of bilirubin levels (primary endpoint) and influence on paraclinical and clinical parameters (secondary endpoints) associated with liver failure.

Methods

Patients presenting with liver failure were screened for eligibility and after inclusion were randomly assigned to be started on either conventional MARS or SPAD (with 4 % albumin and a dialysis flow rate of 700 ml/h). Statistical analyses were based on a linear mixed-effects model.

Results

Sixty-nine crossover cycles of ECAD in 32 patients were completed. Both systems significantly reduced plasma bilirubin levels to a similar extent (MARS: median −68 μmol/L, interquartile range [IQR] −107.5 to −33.5, p = 0.001; SPAD: −59 μmol/L, −84.5 to +36.5, p = 0.001). However, bile acids (MARS: −39 μmol/L, −105.6 to −8.3, p < 0.001; SPAD: −9 μmol/L, −36.9 to +11.4, p = 0.131), creatinine (MARS: −24 μmol/L, −46.5 to −8.0, p < 0.001; SPAD: −2 μmol/L, −9.0 to +7.0/L, p = 0.314) and urea (MARS: −0.9 mmol/L, −1.93 to −0.10, p = 0.024; SPAD: −0.1 mmol/L, −1.0 to +0.68, p = 0.523) were reduced and albumin-binding capacity was increased (MARS: +10 %, −0.8 to +20.9 %, p < 0.001; SPAD: +7 %, −7.5 to +15.5 %, p = 0.137) only by MARS. Cytokine levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 and hepatic encephalopathy were altered by neither MARS nor SPAD.

Conclusions

Both procedures were safe for temporary extracorporeal liver support. While in clinical practice routinely assessed plasma bilirubin levels were reduced by both systems, only MARS affected other paraclinical parameters (i.e., serum bile acids, albumin-binding capacity, and creatinine and urea levels). Caution should be taken with regard to metabolic derangements and electrolyte disturbances, particularly in SPAD using regional citrate anti-coagulation.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trials Register (www.drks.de) DRKS00000371. Registered 8 April 2010.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-1159-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.