HISTAMINIC CEPHALGIA LINKED WITH UPPER RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS

Age of onset of episodic and chronic cluster headache - a review of a large case series from a single headache centre

Background

In the largest case series of cluster headache (CH) published in the literature, age of onset varies between 29.6 and 31.6 years. Differences in onset age based on gender and subtype diagnosis are reported, while there are only few data on patients with childhood and elderly onset. We therefore deemed it useful to review our own large case series of CH patients.

Methods

The age of onset of cluster headache was investigated in a consecutive case series of 808 patients (585 men and 223 women), including 686 (503 men and 183 women) with episodic cluster headache (ECH), 103 (66 men and 37 women) with chronic cluster headache (CCH), and 19 with an indeterminate form of CH (16 men and three women).

Results

The mean age of onset was 30.2 ± 13.8 years (30.1 ± 13.0 in men and 30.4 ± 15.7 in women). The women with primary CCH had a mean onset age of 42.8 ± 21.7 years, while the women with secondary CCH did not differ much from those with ECH. Distribution of the study subjects by decades of onset age showed a peak in the third decade both in men and in women, but when only CCH patients were considered it displayed a more marked bimodal pattern in women (with peaks in the second and the sixth decade) than men (with peaks in the third and the fifth decade). The clear male predominance in cases with onset in the central age groups became attenuated in the extreme age groups. In patients with onset between ≤ 15 years and ≥ 50 years, the traditional male-to-female ratio was actually inverted in CCH.

Conclusions

Based on these epidemiological findings, it would be important to investigate the possible role, causative or protective, played by hormonal factors in CH pathogenesis.

Paroxysmal neuralgic upper cervical pain attacks: the lower syndrome of cluster headache

We present a group of seven patients with a lower syndrome (LS) of cluster headache (CH). Seventy-three newly diagnosed patients with CH were subjected to a 9 years follow-up study; 66 patients were classified as upper syndrome (US) and only seven patients (9.5%) as LS. We focus on the characteristics of this group of seven patients with LS and compare them with existing literature. The seven cases with LS illustrate the wider spectrum of clinical manifestations that can occur in CH, namely infraortibal symptoms or these outside the territory of the trigeminal branches such as the upper cervical region or the craniocervical margin. The duration of the attacks can last more than 180 min. The attacks show a circadian/circannual regularity and a stereotypic pattern of symptoms in most of the patients. The severity and duration of the attacks may increase over the years. The neck pain can overshadow all the other symptoms of CH. Because of the regularity of the attacks at particular times of day or night in some patients, even abortive therapy can be used as prevention when taken some hours before the suspected attack. We hypothesize that some patients with LS may represent an anatomical-functional variant of a primary chronic neurovascular pain disorder originating from the central nervous system, with possible involvement of the hypothalamus and the trigeminovascular (TV) system, with inputs from the cervical roots C(0)-C(2). Clinicians should consider CH when pain attacks are located outside the orbitotemporal regions, but fulfil the other diagnostic criteria for CH and should try ergotamine, oxygen, sumatriptan, verapamil, steroids or even combinations in these patients.

Wilfred Harris' early description of cluster headache

Wilfred Harris was a London neurologist with a significant interest in the treatment of neuralgia. Harris' descriptions of what he called migrainous neuralgia were the first recorded of cluster headache in the English medical literature. He was probably one of the first to describe the cluster phenomenon itself and the effectiveness of ergotamine in treating acute attacks of cluster headache. His seminal contributions to the clinical and therapeutic spectrum of cluster headache are reviewed.

Possible predictive factors in the evolution of episodic to chronic cluster headache

The purpose of our study was to identify general factors and distinctive clinical features differentiating patients with chronic cluster headache (CH) evolved from episodic CH and patients with episodic CH. Our study sample included 28 patients suffering from chronic CH evolved from episodic CH and 258 patients with episodic CH; all were referred to the Headache Center of Parma between December 1975 and June 1998. Patients with episodic CH were selected from all episodic CH referrals (n = 485) and selection was based on the duration of the disorder, which was to exceed the average period needed for an episodic form to turn into a chronic form (4.5 years for females and 7.0 years for males). At CH onset, the mean age for patients with chronic CH evolved from episodic CH was older than for those with episodic CH. Among patients with chronic CH, more were smokers or heavy drinkers, and had suffered a head injury. Clinically, episodic CH evolving into chronic CH was characterized by a high frequency of cluster periods, a larger proportion of patients with attacks not occurring strictly within cluster periods, and remission periods lasting less than 6 months. Possible predictive factors in the development of chronic CH appear to be CH onset from the third decade of life onward, the occurrence of more than one cluster period a year, and the short-lived duration of remission periods. The role played by head injury and cigarette smoking in the evolution of the disorder still cannot be established with certainty.

Primary and secondary chronic cluster headache: two separate entities?

The International Headache Society (IHS) classification divides chronic cluster headache (CH) into two subtypes: chronic CH unremitting from onset (CCHU) and chronic CH evolved from episodic (CCHE). The purpose of our study was to point out any similarities and differences between the two chronic CH subtypes and to determine whether or not they can be considered as two separate clinical entities. We reviewed data about 31 CCHE patients and 38 CCHU patients referred to the Parma Headache Centre between 1975 and 1999. Clinically, CCHE patients exhibited statistically significant differences from CCHU patients, i.e. earlier CH onset and duration of attacks varying more frequently between 120 and 180 min. From the point of view of lifestyle, heavy alcohol and coffee drinkers prevailed among CCHU patients, while CCHE patients were more frequently heavy smokers. Based on clinical features, it seems reasonable to suppose that chronic CH may occur as two distinct entities.

Cluster headache is not associated with signs of a systemic inflammation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether there is clinical or biochemical evidence for a transient systemic inflammation during active periods of cluster headache.

METHODS

Twenty-seven male and female consecutively selected patients with episodic cluster headache filled in questionnaires aiming at detecting any concurrent systemic vasculitic or rheumatoid disease. They were physically examined by both a neurologist and a rheumatologist independent of each other. Blood and urine samples were taken one to three times during an active cluster period and once in remission. The following analyses were performed: hemoglobin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, complete blood counts including differential counts, creatinine, albumin, creatine kinase, electrophoreses of serum (with haptoglobin, orosomucoid, IgG, IgM), von Willebrand's factor, antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies, perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies, and routine urinary tests. An age- and sex-matched control group of 99 consecutive patients attending the Outpatient Department of Neurology for symptoms/diseases other than severe headache completed the same questionnaire as the patient group.

RESULTS

Only one patient with cluster headache showed clinical signs (livedo reticularis) that could have been due to an ongoing systemic vasculitis. Most symptoms were equally or even more prevalent in the control group than among the patients with cluster headache. However, cold feet were about twice as prevalent among female patients with cluster headache than in the control group. This was considered due to their smoking habits. Laboratory tests showed no statistically significant differences between the active cluster periods and remission. There were some slightly abnormal values in single laboratory tests, some of which were probably due to concurrent upper respiratory infections. The findings of laboratory tests for one patient could have been due to nephritis. All patients were negative for cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies and perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

These results were taken as evidence that no systemic inflammation is present during the active cluster headache period. However, whether a local retro-orbital inflammation underlies the pathophysiology of cluster headache remains obscure.