Drug dependency in patients with chronic headaches

The prescription opioid and heroin crisis: a public health approach to an epidemic of addiction

Public health authorities have described, with growing alarm, an unprecedented increase in morbidity and mortality associated with use of opioid pain relievers (OPRs). Efforts to address the opioid crisis have focused mainly on reducing nonmedical OPR use. Too often overlooked, however, is the need for preventing and treating opioid addiction, which occurs in both medical and nonmedical OPR users. Overprescribing of OPRs has led to a sharp increase in the prevalence of opioid addiction, which in turn has been associated with a rise in overdose deaths and heroin use. A multifaceted public health approach that utilizes primary, secondary, and tertiary opioid addiction prevention strategies is required to effectively reduce opioid-related morbidity and mortality. We describe the scope of this public health crisis, its historical context, contributing factors, and lines of evidence indicating the role of addiction in exacerbating morbidity and mortality, and we provide a framework for interventions to address the epidemic of opioid addiction.

Dependence and addiction during chronic opioid therapy

The use of opioids for chronic noncancer pain has increased dramatically over the past 25 years in North America and has been accompanied by a major increase in opioid addiction and overdose deaths. The increase in opioid prescribing is multifactorial and partly reflects concerns about the effectiveness and safety of alternative medications, particularly the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, much of the rise in opioid prescribing reflects the assertion, widely communicated to physicians in the 1990s, that the risks of dependence and addiction during chronic opioid therapy were low, predictable, and could be minimized by the use of controlled-release opioid formulations. In this narrative review, we offer a critical appraisal of the publications most frequently cited as evidence that the risk of addiction during chronic opioid therapy is low. We conclude that very few well-designed studies support the notion that opioid addiction is rare during chronic opioid therapy and that none can be readily generalized to present-day practice. Despite serious methodological limitations, these studies have been repeatedly mischaracterized as showing that the risk of addiction during chronic opioid therapy is rare. These studies are countered by a larger, more rigorous and contemporary body of evidence demonstrating that dependence and addiction are relatively common consequences of chronic opioid therapy, occurring in up to one-third of patients in some series.

Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone)

SUMMARY OF CONSENSUS: 1. The use of opioids in cancer pain: The criteria for selecting analgesics for pain treatment in the elderly include, but are not limited to, overall efficacy, overall side-effect profile, onset of action, drug interactions, abuse potential, and practical issues, such as cost and availability of the drug, as well as the severity and type of pain (nociceptive, acute/chronic, etc.). At any given time, the order of choice in the decision-making process can change. This consensus is based on evidence-based literature (extended data are not included and chronic, extended-release opioids are not covered). There are various driving factors relating to prescribing medication, including availability of the compound and cost, which may, at times, be the main driving factor. The transdermal formulation of buprenorphine is available in most European countries, particularly those with high opioid usage, with the exception of France; however, the availability of the sublingual formulation of buprenorphine in Europe is limited, as it is marketed in only a few countries, including Germany and Belgium. The opioid patch is experimental at present in U.S.A. and the sublingual formulation has dispensing restrictions, therefore, its use is limited. It is evident that the population pyramid is upturned. Globally, there is going to be an older population that needs to be cared for in the future. This older population has expectations in life, in that a retiree is no longer an individual who decreases their lifestyle activities. The "baby-boomers" in their 60s and 70s are "baby zoomers"; they want to have a functional active lifestyle. They are willing to make trade-offs regarding treatment choices and understand that they may experience pain, providing that can have increased quality of life and functionality. Therefore, comorbidities--including cancer and noncancer pain, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and postherpetic neuralgia--and patient functional status need to be taken carefully into account when addressing pain in the elderly. World Health Organization step III opioids are the mainstay of pain treatment for cancer patients and morphine has been the most commonly used for decades. In general, high level evidence data (Ib or IIb) exist, although many studies have included only few patients. Based on these studies, all opioids are considered effective in cancer pain management (although parts of cancer pain are not or only partially opioid sensitive), but no well-designed specific studies in the elderly cancer patient are available. Of the 2 opioids that are available in transdermal formulation--fentanyl and buprenorphine--fentanyl is the most investigated, but based on the published data both seem to be effective, with low toxicity and good tolerability profiles, especially at low doses. 2. The use of opioids in noncancer-related pain: Evidence is growing that opioids are efficacious in noncancer pain (treatment data mostly level Ib or IIb), but need individual dose titration and consideration of the respective tolerability profiles. Again no specific studies in the elderly have been performed, but it can be concluded that opioids have shown efficacy in noncancer pain, which is often due to diseases typical for an elderly population. When it is not clear which drugs and which regimes are superior in terms of maintaining analgesic efficacy, the appropriate drug should be chosen based on safety and tolerability considerations. Evidence-based medicine, which has been incorporated into best clinical practice guidelines, should serve as a foundation for the decision-making processes in patient care; however, in practice, the art of medicine is realized when we individualize care to the patient. This strikes a balance between the evidence-based medicine and anecdotal experience. Factual recommendations and expert opinion both have a value when applying guidelines in clinical practice. 3. The use of opioids in neuropathic pain: The role of opioids in neuropathic pain has been under debate in the past but is nowadays more and more accepted; however, higher opioid doses are often needed for neuropathic pain than for nociceptive pain. Most of the treatment data are level II or III, and suggest that incorporation of opioids earlier on might be beneficial. Buprenorphine shows a distinct benefit in improving neuropathic pain symptoms, which is considered a result of its specific pharmacological profile. 4. The use of opioids in elderly patients with impaired hepatic and renal function: Functional impairment of excretory organs is common in the elderly, especially with respect to renal function. For all opioids except buprenorphine, half-life of the active drug and metabolites is increased in the elderly and in patients with renal dysfunction. It is, therefore, recommended that--except for buprenorphine--doses be reduced, a longer time interval be used between doses, and creatinine clearance be monitored. Thus, buprenorphine appears to be the top-line choice for opioid treatment in the elderly. 5. Opioids and respiratory depression: Respiratory depression is a significant threat for opioid-treated patients with underlying pulmonary condition or receiving concomitant central nervous system (CNS) drugs associated with hypoventilation. Not all opioids show equal effects on respiratory depression: buprenorphine is the only opioid demonstrating a ceiling for respiratory depression when used without other CNS depressants. The different features of opioids regarding respiratory effects should be considered when treating patients at risk for respiratory problems, therefore careful dosing must be maintained. 6. Opioids and immunosuppression: Age is related to a gradual decline in the immune system: immunosenescence, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases, and cancer, and decreased efficacy of immunotherapy, such as vaccination. The clinical relevance of the immunosuppressant effects of opioids in the elderly is not fully understood, and pain itself may also cause immunosuppression. Providing adequate analgesia can be achieved without significant adverse events, opioids with minimal immunosuppressive characteristics should be used in the elderly. The immunosuppressive effects of most opioids are poorly described and this is one of the problems in assessing true effect of the opioid spectrum, but there is some indication that higher doses of opioids correlate with increased immunosuppressant effects. Taking into consideration all the very limited available evidence from preclinical and clinical work, buprenorphine can be recommended, while morphine and fentanyl cannot. 7. Safety and tolerability profile of opioids: The adverse event profile varies greatly between opioids. As the consequences of adverse events in the elderly can be serious, agents should be used that have a good tolerability profile (especially regarding CNS and gastrointestinal effects) and that are as safe as possible in overdose especially regarding effects on respiration. Slow dose titration helps to reduce the incidence of typical initial adverse events such as nausea and vomiting. Sustained release preparations, including transdermal formulations, increase patient compliance.

Challenges in the development of prescription opioid abuse-deterrent formulations

Opioid analgesics remain the cornerstone of effective management for moderate-to-severe pain. In the face of persistent lack of access to opioids by patients with legitimate pain problems, the rate of prescription opioid abuse in the United States has escalated over the past 15 years. Abuse-deterrent opioid products can play a central role in optimizing the risk-benefit ratio of opioid analgesics--if these products can be developed cost-effectively without compromising efficacy or creating new safety issues for the target treatment population. The development of scientific methods for assessing prescription opioid abuse potential remains a critical and challenging step in determining whether a claim of abuse deterrence for a new opioid product is indeed valid and will thus be accepted by the medical, regulatory, and reimbursement communities. To explore this and other potential impediments to the development of prescription opioid abuse-deterrent formulations, a panel of experts on opioid abuse and diversion from academia, industry, and governmental agencies participated in a Tufts Health Care Institute-supported symposium held on October 27 and 28, 2005, in Boston, MA. This manuscript captures the main consensus opinions of those experts, and also information gleaned from a review of the relevant published literature, to identify major impediments to the development of opioid abuse-deterrent formulations and offer strategies that may accelerate their commercialization.

Incidence and antecedents of nonmedical prescription opioid use in four US communities. The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Nonmedical use of prescription opioids has emerged as a major public health problem during the last decade, but direct measures of incidence and predisposing factors are lacking.

METHODS

We prospectively measured incidence and antecedents of nonmedical prescription opioid use in The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study among 28-40-year-old African- and European-American men and women with no prior history of nonmedical opioid use.

RESULTS

Among 3163 participants, 23 reported new nonmedical prescription opioid use in 2000-2001 (5-year incidence 0.7%; 95%CI: 0.4-1.0%). All 23 had previously reported marijuana use (p<0.001). Five-year incidence was significantly higher among European-American men (OR=3.3; 95%CI: 1.3-8.3), and among participants reporting a history of amphetamine use (OR=24; 95%CI: 6.9-83) or medical opioid use for treatment of pain (OR=8.6; 95%CI: 2.5-30). These associations remained strong when examined among marijuana users and after adjusting for demographics, social factors, and other antecedent substance use. Amphetamine use was the best single predictor of future nonmedical use (sensitivity 87%, specificity 79%).

CONCLUSIONS

Initiation of nonmedical prescription opioid use is generally rare in 28-40-year-old adults, but is observed to be more common with a previous history of substance abuse and legal access to opioids through prescription by a physician.

Addiction to opioids in chronic pain patients: a literature review

Opioids have proven very useful for treatment of acute pain and cancer pain, and in the developed countries opioids are increasingly used for treatment of chronic non-malignant pain patients as well. This literature review aims at giving an overview of definitions, mechanisms, diagnostic criteria, incidence and prevalence of addiction in opioid treated pain patients, screening tools for assessing opioid addiction in chronic pain patients and recommendations regarding addiction problems in national and international guidelines for opioid treatment in cancer patients and chronic non-malignant pain patients. The review indicates that the prevalence of addiction varied from 0% up to 50% in chronic non-malignant pain patients, and from 0% to 7.7% in cancer patients depending of the subpopulation studied and the criteria used. The risk of addiction has to be considered when initiating long-term opioid treatment as addiction may result in poor pain control. Several screening tools were identified, but only a few were thoroughly validated with respect to validity and reliability. Most of the identified guidelines mention addiction as a potential problem. The guidelines in cancer pain management are concerned with the fact that pain may be under treated because of fear of addiction, and the guidelines in management of non-malignant pain patients include warnings of addiction. According to the literature, it seems appropriate and necessary to be aware of the problems associated with addiction during long-term opioid treatment, and specialised treatment facilities for pain management or addiction medicine should be consulted in these cases.

A comparison of the abuse liability of tramadol, NSAIDs, and hydrocodone in patients with chronic pain

Concern about abuse/dependence in chronic pain patients taking opioid analgesics may lead to undertreatment of pain, yet little is known about the prevalence of abuse/dependence in these patients and how it differs among analgesic agents. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of tramadol abuse compared to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and hydrocodone-containing analgesics in patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNP). The study had three arms. The first arm consisted of subjects prescribed tramadol alone; the second of subjects randomized to either NSAIDs or tramadol; and the third of subjects randomized to hydrocodone or tramadol. Each investigator received two boxes of prescriptions randomized so that one in every four prescriptions was for tramadol. Upon deciding on the therapeutically appropriate arm, the physician selected the appropriate box, opened the next envelope and completed the enclosed prescription. After the initial randomization, physicians could prescribe whatever medication was therapeutically appropriate. A total of 11,352 subjects were enrolled. Up to nine interviews using a structured questionnaire were conducted over a 12-month period. An algorithm called the "Abuse Index" was developed to identify subjects who were abusing the drug. The primary components of the index were increasing dose without physician approval, use for purposes other than intended, inability to stop its use, and withdrawal. The percent of subjects who scored positive for abuse at least once during the 12-month follow-up were 2.5% for NSAIDs, 2.7% for tramadol, and 4.9% for hydrocodone. When more than one hit on the algorithm was used as a measure of persistence, abuse rates were 0.5% for NSAIDs, 0.7% for tramadol, and 1.2% for hydrocodone. Thus, the results of this study suggest that the prevalence of abuse/dependence over a 12-month period in a CNP population that was primarily female was equivalent for tramadol and NSAIDs, with both significantly less than the rate for hydrocodone.

Opioid therapy in patients with a history of substance abuse

A range of aberrant drug-taking behaviours can occur in patients who are undergoing treatment for chronic pain, especially if opioid therapy is involved. Assessing and understanding these behaviours, and their relationship to addiction (or substance use disorder), can be difficult but it is necessary for assuring quality pain management. Aberrant drug-taking behaviour may be evident, for example, when a patient with pain is unilaterally escalating doses of opioids or using the medications to treat other symptoms or when prescriptions are being mishandled. In patients with a history of substance abuse, these are often serious developments to which a clinician must know how to react. These complex behaviours may be indicative of addiction or may be simply a reaction to under-medicated pain. The clinician therefore is challenged to understand such behaviours and plan interventions accordingly. Although it is becoming increasingly common to avoid opioid therapy in patients demonstrating such challenging behaviours for fear of regulatory scrutiny, clinical management can be tailored to address the many possibilities that might be giving rise to such behaviours. In addition, control over prescriptions can be accomplished without necessarily terminating the prescribing of controlled substances entirely. Optimal medical management of chronic pain in those patients with addiction problems or engaging in problematic behaviours involves careful, ongoing assessment by the clinician as well as a tailored management approach. This approach should use multiple structures including strict contracts, prudent drug selection and frequent follow-ups to pain and addiction treatments, including the use of urine toxicology screening, to maximise the likelihood of a good outcome.

Chronic pain, substance abuse and addiction

Health care professionals face numerous challenges in assessing and treating chronic pain patients with a substance abuse history. Societal perspectives on morality and criminality, imprecise addiction terminology, litigation fears, and genuine concern for a patient's relapse into or escalation of substance abuse result in unrelieved and under-relieved pain in precisely the population that--as increasing evidence indicates--is generally intolerant of pain. Before adequate pain relief can occur in chronic pain patients with current or past substance abuse issues, it is imperative that the clinician recognize addiction as a disease with known symptoms and treatments. Further, the clinician must realize the difference between true addiction and similar conditions, so the patient's condition can be monitored and regulated properly. Although clinicians are often reluctant to medicate with opioids, it is always best to err on the side of adequate pain relief. Withholding opioids from chronic pain patients in order to avoid the onset or relapse of addiction is contrary to the growing body of evidence and results only in unnecessary pain for the patient. Chronic pain in patients with a history of addictive disease can be treated successfully with opiate analgesia; it just requires caution and careful monitoring of medication use. If addiction is treated as a known risk when providing opioid analgesia to a recovering addict, its development can be minimized while pain relief is provided.

Does chronic daily headache arise de novo in association with regular use of analgesics?

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of chronic daily headache in association with regular use of analgesics is about 2%. Whether regular use of analgesics has a causal or consequential relationship to daily headache has not been established. A causal relationship has been suggested consequent to the observation of improvement or resolution of headache following analgesic withdrawal in patients attending headache clinics, but this observation has not been validated by controlled trials.

PURPOSE

The aim of our investigation was to determine whether regular use of analgesics is associated with the development of chronic daily headache de novo and to characterize the clinical phenotype of those headaches by carefully studying chronic daily headache in patients with regular use of analgesics for a nonheadache indication.

METHODS

Patients attending a rheumatology-monitoring clinic of second-line agents were interviewed by a training neurologist with regard to their analgesic and headache history. Headache classification was according to the criteria of the International Headache Society. Daily headache characteristics were surveyed via a standardized questionnaire, and headache features were further explored by a trained medical interviewer.

RESULTS

Of 110 patients presenting to a rheumatology-monitoring clinic, 73% had a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, 23% had seronegative arthritis, and 4% comprised a miscellaneous group. One hundred three were using one or more analgesics regularly for their arthritis. Of this group, 8 (7.6%) reported a history of chronic daily headache, each of whom reported a history of migraine. The onset of migraine occurred before the onset of chronic daily headache in 7 patients and at about the same time as the chronic daily headache in 1 patient. In those with onset of migraine prior to chronic daily headache, the mean interval before the onset of headache was 30 years (range, 10 to 50 years). Regular use of analgesics preceded the onset of daily headache in 5 patients by a mean of 5.4 years (range, 2 to 10 years). In 1 patient, analgesic use and the development of daily headache occurred at about the same time. In 1 patient, the onset of daily headache preceded regular use of analgesics by almost 30 years. Five of those with regular use of analgesics had been taking an opiate-based preparation in combination with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent in 4. Two had been on a combination of acetaminophen (paracetamol) and a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. The minimum number of tablets per week was 7, and the mean was 48 (range, 7 to 87). Of those patients who did not have daily headache, 41% had a history of migraine and 27% reported a history of tension-type headache.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that individuals with primary headache, specifically migraine, are predisposed to developing chronic daily headache in association with regular use of analgesics.

Pain management in a pediatric rehabilitation setting

This article reviews the current understanding of pain evaluation as applied to children who have chronic illness and disabilities. Utilizing a collaborative medical approach, psychiatric principles of management are discussed. Case scenarios are presented to outline application of general strategies of clinical management.

Do butalbital-containing products have a role in the management of migraine?

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of butalbital-containing products in the management of migraine.

METHODS

Qualitative systematic search using MEDLINE (January 1966-November 2001), review of the United States Headache Consortium's evidence-based guidelines for migraine treatment, and review of other pertinent literature.

RESULTS

Over 28 million people suffer with migraine, yet this illness is less than optimally diagnosed and managed. Between 14% and 36% of diagnosed migraineurs are prescribed butalbital-containing products, often as initial therapy. However, the only identified controlled trial of these drugs for migraine treatment showed that butalbital-containing products were inferior to butorphanol. The consortium's guidelines specifically discourage administration of butalbital-containing products for migraine. In addition, other published literature highlights the frequent adverse consequences of butalbital-containing products for migraineurs, such as poor migraine control, disability, drug-induced headaches, and withdrawal symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Although butalbital-containing products commonly are prescribed for migraine, no evidence in the literature demonstrates their benefit over other agents or placebo. Drugs with proven migraine efficacy, as listed in the consortium's evidence-based guidelines, should be prescribed instead.

Opioids in non-cancer pain: a life-time sentence?

There is continuing reluctance to prescribe strong opioids for the management of chronic non-cancer pain due to concerns about side-effects, physical tolerance, withdrawal and addiction. Randomized controlled trials have now provided evidence for the efficacy of opioids against both nociceptive and neuropathic pain. However, there is considerable variability in response rates, possibly depending on the type of pain, the type of opioid and its route of administration, the time to follow-up, compliance and the development of tolerance. Five patients were selected with nociceptive or neuropathic pain in whom other pharmacological or physical therapies had failed to provide satisfactory pain relief. They received transdermal fentanyl (starting dose 25 microg/h) for at least 6 weeks. Transdermal fentanyl dosage was titrated upwards as required. Transdermal fentanyl provided adequate pain relief in patients with nociceptive pain (diabetic ulcer, osteoporotic vertebral fracture, ankylosing spondylitis) or neuropathic pain with a nociceptive component (radicular pain due to disc protrusion, herpetic neuralgia). The duration of treatment ranged from 6 weeks to 6 months for four cases. In the case of ankylosing spondylitis, treatment was carried out for 2 years, stopped and then restarted successfully. There were no withdrawal effects or addictive behaviour on treatment cessation, regardless of duration of the treatment. In conclusion, strong opioids may provide prolonged effective pain relief in selected patients with nociceptive and neuropathic non-cancer pain. Transdermal fentanyl treatment can often be temporary and can easily be stopped following adequate pain relief without withdrawal effects or any evidence of addictive behaviour.

Treatment of chronic pain in osteoarthritis: do opioids have a clinical role?

Pain is the most prominent symptom and clinical finding in osteoarthritis (OA). Acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy are the mainstays of OA analgesia, but other drug and non-drug therapy, joint injections, and surgery may be needed to provide reasonable quality of life. Regularly scheduled, low-dose opioids can produce good relief of chronic nonmalignant pain including pain caused by OA. This paper reviews the potential risks and benefits of opioids, the evidence supporting their use in OA pain, and guidelines for their use in OA pain.

Anesthesia and pain management

Acute orofacial pain is usually managed by the administration of local anesthetics, systemic analgesics, or a combination of the two methods. In an emergency, intraoral maxillary nerve blockade is helpful for controlling pain in the midface, although infiltrations may be more suitable for discomfort originating from individual teeth or portions of the alveolar process. Mandibular anesthesia can be achieved by open or closed-mouth techniques for inferioral alveolar-lingual nerve blockade. Systemic pain relief is optimized by using full analgesic doses of NSAIDs, with opioids serving to increase the degree of analgesia if required, or to be used, often with acetaminophen, in patients intolerant to NSAIDs.

A pilot survey of aberrant drug-taking attitudes and behaviors in samples of cancer and AIDS patients

The clinical assessment of drug-taking behaviors in medically ill patients with pain is complex and may be hindered by the lack of empirically derived information about such behaviors in particularly medically ill populations. To investigate issues surrounding the assessment of these behaviors, we piloted a questionnaire based on the observations of specialists in pain management and substance abuse. This preliminary questionnaire evaluated medication use, present and past drug abuse, patients' beliefs about the risk of addiction in the context of pain treatment, and aberrant drug-taking attitudes and behaviors. This instrument was piloted in a mixed group of cancer patients (N = 52) and a group of women with HIV/AIDS (N = 111). Reports of past drug use and abuse were more frequent than present reports in both groups. Current aberrant drug-related behaviors were seldom reported, but attitude items revealed that patients would consider engaging in aberrant behaviors, or would possibly excuse them in others, if pain or symptom management were inadequate. Aberrant behaviors and attitudes were endorsed more frequently by the women with HIV/AIDS than by the cancer patients. Patients greatly overestimated the risk of addiction in pain treatment. We discuss the significance of these findings and the need for cautious interpretation given the limitations of the methodology. This early experience suggests that both cancer and HIV/AIDS patients appear to respond in a forthcoming fashion to drug-taking behavior questions and describe attitudes and behaviors that may be highly relevant to the diagnosis and understanding management of substance use among patients with medical illness.

Assessment of physiatrists' knowledge and perspectives on the use of opioids: review of basic concepts for managing chronic pain

Previous studies of physicians have elucidated knowledge gaps and misconceptions about the use of opioids for the treatment of chronic pain. The recent approval of a pain management subspecialty certification for physiatrists will create higher expectations of the field regarding the treatment of chronic pain. Five hundred randomly chosen physiatrists were surveyed with a 50.6% response rate. Ninety-eight percent of respondents treat patients with chronic noncancer pain diagnoses, and 37% occasionally treat patients with cancer-related pain. Seventy percent of respondents underestimated the percentage of patients with cancer-related pain that could experience relief with oral analgesics. Only 17% underestimated the percentage of advanced cancer patients that experience significant pain. Eight percent of respondents incorrectly answered that a patient, regardless of diagnosis, would become addicted to opioids by taking an opioid daily. Only 25% identified the correct definition of addiction. Questions regarding side effects revealed that 10% of respondents incorrectly believed that opioid-induced respiratory depression is common in patients whose oral morphine dose exceeds 100 mg per day. Eighty percent of respondents preferred long-acting preparations, and 92% preferred set dosing schedules for the treatment of chronic pain. Rapidly evolving concepts regarding the implementation of pharmacologic regimens for chronic pain diagnoses require health care professionals who are trained to administer these treatments. Overall, the survey results are encouraging regarding physiatrists' knowledge about the use of opioids to treat patients with chronic pain.

Barriers to better pain control in hospitalized patients

Pain is often inadequately treated. To evaluate a common method of assessing pain and to identify some barriers to improving pain control, 50 hospitalized patients in pain, their nurses, and their physicians were interviewed about the pain experienced by the patients. The patients' "pain behavior" was assessed and literatures was reviewed to identify the risk for developing iatrogenic drug addiction in patients with no prior history of drug abuse. Doctors and nurses tended to assess pain intensity as less than the patients' assessments. The doctor's and nurse's assessment of the same patient correlated poorly (r = 0.21). Pain behavior correlated weakly (rs = 0.36) with patients' pain scores. Twenty-one patients wanted more pain medicine but often staff would not give more. A common reason was fear of addiction, notwithstanding a literature that iatrogenic addiction hardly ever occurs in usual hospitalized patients. Barriers to better pain control in acutely hospitalized patients include: (1) exaggerated fear of iatrogenic addiction, (2) an attitude among staff that patients exaggerate the intensity of their pain, (3) poor correlation between pain behavior and pain intensity that can mislead staff who rely on pain behavior to assess pain intensity, and (4) a lack of agreement between doctor and nurse in estimating the intensity of a patient's pain. A new way of thinking about patients in pain, assessing pain as either present or absent, is proposed for evaluation. If pain is present, one should attempt to ameliorate it in a manner consistent with the desire of the patient and the acceptability of adverse effects.

Approaches to treatment decisions for psychiatric comorbidity in the management of the chronic pain patient

A number of different types of comorbidities have been described within psychiatric patients. These comorbidity types are reviewed and their application to the chronic pain population is discussed. These various types of comorbidities are then utilized to generate an approach for treatment decisions in the management of the chronic pain patient.

Opioids for managing patients with chronic pain: community pharmacists' perspectives and concerns

Previous studies of pharmacists have suggested poor availability of opioids and apprehension about dispensing these drugs. This pilot study surveyed 52 randomly selected New Jersey community pharmacists (response rate = 69%). Reluctance to stock opioids was attributed to concerns about robbery by 14% and to concerns about federal or state investigation by 17%. No correlation was found between respondents who had a high degree of concern about robbery and those who had incurred previous robbery. Of the 20% of respondents who had incurred a prior federal or state investigation, none expressed more than minimal concern about opioid regulatory issues. Pharmacist confidence in the acceptability of opioids for chronic pain was 75% for malignant pain in patients with no history of opioid abuse and declined to 3% for nonmalignant pain in patients with a history of opioid abuse.

Screening for addiction in patients with chronic pain and "problematic" substance use: evaluation of a pilot assessment tool

Assessing for the presence of addiction in the chronic pain patient receiving chronic opioid analgesia is a challenging clinical task. This paper presents a recently developed screening tool for addictive disease in chronic pain patients, and pilot efficacy data describing its ability to do so. In a small sample of patients (n = 52) referred from a multidisciplinary pain center for "problematic" medication use, responses to the screening questionnaire were compared between patients who met combined diagnostic criteria for a substance use disorder and those who did not, as assessed by a trained addiction medicine specialist. Responses of addicted patients significantly differed from those of nonaddicted patients on multiple screening items, with the two groups easily differentiated by total questionnaire score. Further, three key screening indicators were identified as excellent predictors for the presence of addictive disease in this sample of chronic pain patients.

Prolonged treatment with transdermal fentanyl in neuropathic pain

Forty-eight patients with noncancer neuropathic pain who had participated in a randomized controlled trial with intravenous fentanyl (FENiv) infusions received prolonged transdermal fentanyl (FENtd) in an open prospective study. Pain relief, side effects, tolerance, psychological dependence, mood changes, and quality of life were evaluated. The value of clinical baseline characteristics and the response to FENiv also was evaluated in terms of the outcome with long-term FENtd. Eighteen patients stopped prematurely because of insufficient pain relief, side effects, or both. Among the remaining 30 patients completing the 12-week dose titration protocol, pain relief was substantial in 13 and moderate in five. Quality of life improved (23%, P < 0.01). Psychological dependence or the induction of depression was not observed. In only one patient did tolerance emerge. There was a significant positive correlation between the pain relief obtained with FENiv and that with prolonged FENtd (r = 0.59, P < 0.0001). We conclude that (1) long-term transdermal fentanyl may be effective in noncancer neuropathic pain without clinically significant management problems and (2) A FENiv-test may assist in selecting neuropathic pain patients who might benefit from prolonged treatment with FENtd.

The effects of a cold-water immersion stressor on the reinforcing and subjective effects of fentanyl in healthy volunteers

The reinforcing and subjective effects of fentanyl, an opioid analgesic, were tested in ten healthy volunteers without histories of drug abuse, as a function of the temperature of a water bath in which the volunteers' forearms were immersed. The temperatures were body-temperature (37 degrees C), moderately cold (10 degrees C), and very cold (2 degrees C). A discrete-trial choice procedure was used in which, in each session, volunteers sampled 50 micrograms of fentanyl (delivered as a bolus via an infusion pump) and saline, and then on three successive trials, chose between the two. Volunteers then had to immerse their non-dominant forearm in the water bath 5 min after a drug delivery. Fentanyl was chosen on 77% of choice occasions in the 10 degrees C and 2 degrees C water conditions, which was significantly different from chance levels, and on 60% of choice occasions in the 37 degrees C water condition, which did not differ from chance levels. Several subjective effects of fentanyl were also modulated by the temperature of the water bath. We conclude that in the context of a painful stimulus, 50 micrograms of fentanyl functions as a reinforcer in non-drug abusers.

Diagnosing addictive disease in chronic pain patients

As opiate therapy is increasingly accepted for the management of chronic pain, the consultation-liaison psychiatrist is often challenged to diagnose and provide treatment recommendations for addictive disease in chronic pain patients. Reviewed are the defining characteristics of addiction within the context of chronic pain, and the interesting commonalities between addictive disease and chronic pain. Guidelines for assessment of addiction in patients with chronic pain are presented, as are suggestions for the management of these concurrent disorders. Underlying this review is a belief that opiates should not be withheld from persons with chronic pain, even in the presence of addictive disease.

Opioid therapy for chronic nonmalignant pain: a review of the critical issues

The controversy surrounding the long-term use of opioid drugs in patients with nonmalignant pain has intensified in recent years. This debate is driven by a new willingness to consider the potential benefits of an approach that has been traditionally rejected as invariably ineffective and unsafe. The published literature continues to be very limited, but a growing clinical experience, combined with a critical reevaluation of issues related to efficacy, safety, and addiction or abuse, suggests that there is a subpopulation of patients with chronic pain that can achieve sustained partial analgesia from opioid therapy without the occurrence of intolerable side effects or the development of aberrant drug-related behaviors. Future research must confirm this impression through controlled clinical trials and clarify those factors that may predict therapeutic success or failure. For the present, the clinician who contemplates this approach must have a clear grasp of the relevant issues and an understanding of the guidelines for treatment and monitoring that have proved useful in practice.

Randomised trial of oral morphine for chronic non-cancer pain

BACKGROUND

The use of opioid analgesics for chronic non-cancer pain is controversial. Some surveys report good pain relief and improvement in performance while others suggest a poor outcome with a propensity to psychological dependence or addiction.

METHODS

We undertook a randomised double-blind crossover study to test the hypothesis that oral morphine relieves pain and improves the quality of life in patients with chronic regional pain of soft tissue or musculoskeletal origin who have not responded to codeine, anti-inflammatory agents, and antidepressants. Morphine was administered as a sustained-release preparation in doses up to 60 mg twice daily and compared with benztropine (active placebo) in doses up to 1 mg twice daily over three-week titration, six-week evaluation, and two-week washout phases. Pain intensity, pain relief, and drug liking were rated weekly and psychological features, functional status, and cognition were assessed at baseline and at the end of each evaluation phase.

FINDINGS

After dose titration in the 46 patients who completed the study, the mean daily doses of drugs were morphine 83.5 mg and benztropine 1.7 mg. On visual analogue scales, the morphine group showed a reduction in pain intensity relative to placebo in period I (p = 0.01) and this group also fared better in a crossover analysis of the sum of pain intensity differences from baseline (p = 0.02). No other significant differences were detected.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with treatment-resistant chronic regional pain of soft-tissue or musculoskeletal origin, nine weeks of oral morphine in doses up to 120 mg daily may confer analgesic benefit with a low risk of addiction but is unlikely to yield psychological or functional improvement.

Opioid therapy for chronic nonmalignant pain: clinician's perspective

During the past decade, debate has intensified about the role of long-term opioid therapy in the management of chronic nonmalignant pain. Specialists in pain management have discussed the issues extensively and now generally agree that a selected population of patients with chronic pain can attain sustained analgesia without significant adverse consequences. This perspective, however, is not uniformly accepted by pain specialists and has not been widely disseminated to other disciplines or the public. Rather, the more traditional perspective, which ascribes both transitory benefit and substantial cumulative risk to long-term opioid therapy, continues to predominate. According to this perspective, the inevitability of tolerance limits the possibility of sustained efficacy, and other pharmacological properties increase the likelihood of adverse outcomes, including persistent side-effects, impairment in physical and psychosocial functioning, and addiction. If accurate, these outcomes would indeed justify the withholding of opioid therapy for all but the most extreme cases of chronic nonmalignant pain.

A personal view of the classification and definition of drug dependence headache

A review of the literature indicates that drug-induced headache exists. The criteria of the International Headache Society proposed for the diagnosis of "headache induced by chronic substance use or exposure", however, need to be modified in order to identify all patients with this headache form.

Legal aspects of the management of chronic pain

OBJECTIVE

To review the legal provisions which control the prescription of opioid analgesics in Australia, and to summarise the areas in which practitioners who treat patients with chronic pain may expect to become involved with the legal system.

DATA SOURCES

The relevant legislation was reviewed, and a selective review was undertaken of literature dealing with the legal aspects of pain and suffering which may form a basis for personal injury claims. Case law which deals with issues of consent to treatment was also examined.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Statutory requirements which control the prescription of opioids were summarised. Leading cases on patient consent were discussed to clarify for the practitioner the principles which the Courts use in the assessment of the validity of the consent given by patients for treatment. The assessment of the pain patient involved in litigation was briefly discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The prescription and administration of opioid analgesics must be in accordance with the legislative provisions. Treatment options must be discussed and explained to patients so that valid consent can be obtained. Patients' questions must be answered in full, and documentation in the clinical record is required.

Chronic use of opioids in intractable facial pain. A case report

The use of opioids in chronic non-malignant pain conditions is largely rejected by the health authorities. Their concern is mostly due to the potential problems of addiction and other adverse effects of opioids. However, in certain pain conditions opioids may be the only effective remedy. This article presents some guidelines for the use of narcotics for non-cancer pain. A case is presented in which methadone in small doses in combination with an antidepressant was the first drug capable of alleviating the patient's suffering. The drug was effective during a period of 9 months.

Drug abuse and headache

Substance abuse has been reported frequently in chronic headache patients. The problem exists in most Western countries. Abuse of various compounds frequently leads to a state of dependency. Prescription as well as over-the-counter agents are often abused. Aspirin, acetaminophen, and caffeine are the most frequently abused compounds. Butalbital, ergot alkaloids, NSAIDS, and narcotic and oral or intranasal sympathomimetics are often abused. Patients with chronic daily headache complain of symptoms that may suggest a mixed-type headache. Features of migraine and muscle contraction headache often coexist in these individuals. It has been suggested that the most frequent cause for the transformation of a periodic headache into a daily headache is substance abuse. Substance abuse and drug dependency have multiple causes, and the etiology will reside with the compounds that are used to excess. The problem may arise as a result of poor instructions from the physician, improper diagnosis with gradual escalation in amounts of drug consumed, or a reinforcement mechanism and a brain stimulation-reward effect. The brain reward system has been studied with narcotics and psychomotor stimulants. It may be activated to a lesser degree with ergotamine, barbiturates, and other abused substances. The long-term effects of substance abuse are contingent on the compounds that are used. They may result in organ damage, medical complications, vascular injury, and a refractory state with chronic headache that eludes successful management of the headache disorder. Patients exhibit a less-than-satisfactory quality of life and are often depressed. Treatment includes outpatient care in cooperative, less dependent patients. Often patients will require inpatient management in order to discontinue use of the abused agents. Pharmacologic agents, behavior modification, psychotherapy, dietary intervention, and acupuncture may be necessary to treat the patient. Each patient must be treated by an interested physician, and the patient will require one or more of the preceding measures for a successful outcome. Often abused compounds must be discontinued in order to obtain a satisfactory response in an individual with chronic headache.

Analgesic-induced chronic headache: long-term results of withdrawal therapy

Headache characteristics are described in 139 patients with chronic daily or almost daily headaches due to regular intake of analgesics and the short- and long-term results of drug withdrawal. Drug-induced headache was described as dull, diffuse, and band-like, and usually started in the early morning. The mean duration of the original headache (migraine or tension headache) was 25 years; regular intake of drugs and chronic daily headache had started 10 and 6 years prior to withdrawal therapy, respectively. Patients took an average of 34.6 tablets or analgesic suppositories or antimigraine drugs per week containing 5.8 different substances. The drugs most often used were caffeine (95%), ergotalkaloids (89%), barbiturates (64%), and spasmolytics, paracetamol, and pyrazolone derivates (45%-46%). A total of 103 patients (68 migraine, 35 tension or combination headache) were available for interviews at a mean time interval of 2.9 years after an inpatient drug withdrawal programme. Chronic headache had disappeared or was reduced by more than 50% in two-thirds of the patients. Positive predictors for successful treatment were migraine as primary headache, chronic headache lasting less than 10 years, and regular intake of ergotamine. Drug intake was significantly reduced and patients used single substances more often. Patients who originally suffered from migraine, superimposed on the daily headache, also experienced a significant improvement in the frequency of the migraines and their intensity. Migraine prophylaxis through beta-blocking agents and calcium channel antagonists was more efficient after drug-withdrawal therapy.

Chronic use of opioid analgesics in non-malignant pain: report of 38 cases

Thirty-eight patients maintained on opioid analgesics for non-malignant pain were retrospectively evaluated to determine the indications, course, safety and efficacy of this therapy. Oxycodone was used by 12 patients, methadone by 7, and levorphanol by 5; others were treated with propoxyphene, meperidine, codeine, pentazocine, or some combination of these drugs. Nineteen patients were treated for four or more years at the time of evaluation, while 6 were maintained for more than 7 years. Two-thirds required less than 20 morphine equivalent mg/day and only 4 took more than 40 mg/day. Patients occasionally required escalation of dose and/or hospitalization for exacerbation of pain; doses usually returned to a stable baseline afterward. Twenty-four patients described partial but acceptable or fully adequate relief of pain, while 14 reported inadequate relief. No patient underwent a surgical procedure for pain management while receiving therapy. Few substantial gains in employment or social function could be attributed to the institution of opioid therapy. No toxicity was reported and management became a problem in only 2 patients, both with a history of prior drug abuse. A critical review of patient characteristics, including data from the 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire in 24 patients, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory in 23, and detailed psychiatric evaluation in 6, failed to disclose psychological or social variables capable of explaining the success of long-term management. We conclude that opioid maintenance therapy can be a safe, salutary and more humane alternative to the options of surgery or no treatment in those patients with intractable non-malignant pain and no history of drug abuse.

Mediating factors in non-medical treatment for migraine headache: toward an interactional model

The inadequacy of traditional (i.e. pharmacological) treatment for migraine headache has led to the development of numerous non-medical interventions (e.g. biofeedback, relaxation, cognitive-behavioral programs). All of these non-medical interventions have produced at least some success in reducing migraine headache parameters. However the mechanism of treatment efficacy is unclear, with a number of not mutually exclusive relationships proposed. Purported mediators of successful outcome in these treatments include specific control of vascular activity, general reduction of autonomic arousal, biochemical changes, cognitive, affective, and behavioral change, therapist contact and support, and credibility and placebo expectancy. The present paper attempts to discuss and evaluate the mechanisms of change that have been proposed as mediators of successful treatment of migraine headache. An interactional model of adaptive change as a function of treatment is presented. The implications of the model for assessment and treatment are discussed. It is suggested that the interactional model may be applicable to the treatment of a range of chronic pain problems.

Drug abuse in migraine patients

Records of all patients discharged with a diagnosis of migraine from 2 Danish neurological departments were examined to determine the incidence of drug abuse. These departments had fixed uptake areas with a population of approximately 500,000 during the 5 year study period (1-1-1976--31-12-1980). Patients were selected for detailed analysis if (1) they used morphinomimetic drugs once a month or more, (2) took 7 or more tablets of weak analgesics a day or (3) consumed more than 60 mg ergotamine a month. A total of 92 patients fulfilled these criteria, 27 only because of ergotamine overuse. Injections of morphinomimetic drugs were given once a week or more frequently to 32 patients. These patients also usually had an escalating consumption and were usually regarded as abusers by their doctors. During admission morphinomimetics were discontinued. None deteriorated, 1/3 remained unchanged whereas 2/3 improved. Thus 32 patients can be regarded as abusers of morphinomimetics which represents an annual incidence of 13 per million inhabitants. We caution against the use of morphinomimetics in migraine.