Vigabatrin and Epilepsy: Lessons Learned

Interrater and Intrarater Agreement of Epileptic Encephalopathy Among Electroencephalographers for Children with Infantile Spasms Using the Burden of Amplitudes and Epileptiform Discharges (BASED) EEG Grading Scale: Study Design and Statistical Considerations

Background

Infantile spasms are a serious epilepsy syndrome with a poor prognosis. Electroencephalography (EEG) has been a key component in the prognosis and treatment of infantile spasms. This multi-center study protocol is developed to investigate interrater and intrarater agreement of an electroencephalographic grading scale—the Burden of Amplitudes and Epileptiform Discharges (BASED) score among electroencephalographers.

Methods

Thirty children, aged 0–2 years, with infantile spasms who were hospitalized in the Chinese PLA General Hospital will be recruited into this study by stratified sampling. Seven electroencephalographers from different Class A tertiary hospitals will select a 5-min epoch with the most severe epileptiform discharge, score the EEG reports, and provide the basis for the scoring. The 420 (30 × 7 × 2) scoring results provided by electroencephalographers in two rounds can be analyzed statistically using weighted kappa (weighted \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa$$\end{document}κ) statstic, Fless’ kappa (Fless’ \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\kappa$$\end{document}κ) statistic, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to calculate the interrater and intrarater agreement.

Discussion

We will recruit more electroencephalographers than were included in previous studies to assess the interrater and intrarater agreement in the selection of 5-min EEG epochs, the BASED scores, and the basis for scoring. If the BASED score has an adequate interrater and intrarater agreement, the score will have more significance for guiding the clinical management and for predicting the prognosis of patients with infantile spasms.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-022-00382-4.

Focal Epilepsy in Children With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Does Vigabatrin Control Focal Seizures?

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of vigabatrin in focal epilepsy associated with tuberous sclerosis complex by retrospectively reviewing patients with focal epilepsy and tuberous sclerosis complex treated with vigabatrin at a pediatric epilepsy center over an 8-year period. Of 85 patients, 20 (23.5%) were seizure-free for >12 months, 45 (52.9%) were responders (≥50% seizure reduction), and 20 (23.5%) were nonresponders. The median age (in months) at seizure onset in the seizure-free group (median, 15; interquartile range [IQR], 6-23.3) was higher than that of responders (median, 5; IQR, 3-14) and nonresponders (median, 6; IQR, 2-12). Fewer patients in the seizure-free group had calcification in their largest tubers, but the presence of tuber calcification did not differ among groups. Vigabatrin is more likely to result in seizure freedom in children with tuberous sclerosis complex who have later infantile onset of focal seizures and no calcification in their largest tuber.

Vigabatrin-related adverse events for the treatment of epileptic spasms: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: Although vigabatrin (VGB) is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of epileptic spasms, there are safety concerns. The aim of this systematic review and metaanalysis was to assess adverse events of VGB for the treatment of epileptic spasms. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched. The population was infants treated with VGB for epileptic spasms. The outcomes were VGB-related adverse events. Meta-analyses of VGB-related MRI abnormalities, retinal toxicity as measured by electroretinogram (ERG), visual field defect as measured by perimetry, and other adverse events were conducted. Results: Fifty-seven articles were included in the systematic review. The rate of VGB-related MRI abnormalities was 21% (95% CI: 15-29%). Risk factors for MRI abnormalities were age younger than 12 months and higher VGB dose. VGB-related retinal toxicity and visual field defect occurred in 29% (95% CI: 7-69%) and 28% (95% CI: 4-78%) respectively. Other adverse events occurred in 23% (95% CI: 16-34%), consisting predominantly of central nervous system symptoms, and the majority of these did not require therapeutic modification. Conclusion: This study will inform physicians and families on the risk profile of VGB for the treatment of epileptic spasms and will help decisions on treatment options.

Vigabatrin add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in 2008 and updated in 2013. Epilepsy is a common neurological condition which affects up to 1% of the population. Approximately 30% of people with epilepsy do not respond to treatment with currently available drugs. The majority of these people have focal epilepsy. Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic drug licensed for use in drug-resistant epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of vigabatrin as an add-on therapy for people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

SEARCH METHODS

For the latest update of this review, we searched the following databases on 1 November 2018: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), MEDLINE (Ovid 1946 to 31 October 2018), ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) are both included in the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web). We checked reference lists of retrieved studies for additional reports of relevant studies and contacted Hoechst Marion Roussel (manufacturers of vigabatrin) in 2000.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fully published trials of vigabatrin in people of any age with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data using the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary analysis was by intention-to-treat (ITT). We evaluated: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, treatment withdrawal, adverse effects, dose-response analysis, cognitive outcomes and quality of life. We presented results as risk ratios (RR) with 95% or 99% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 11 trials that included 756 participants (age range: 10 to 64 years). The trials tested vigabatrin doses between 1 g/day and 6 g/day. All 11 trials displayed a risk of bias across at least three risk of bias domains. Predominantly, the risk of bias was associated with: allocation concealment (selection bias), blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) and incomplete outcome data (attrition bias). Participants treated with vigabatrin may be two to three times more likely to obtain a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency compared with those treated with placebo (RR 2.60, 95% CI 1.87 to 3.63; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence). Those treated with vigabatrin may also be three times more likely to have treatment withdrawn although we are uncertain (RR 2.86, 95% CI 1.25 to 6.55; 4 studies; very low-certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, participants given vigabatrin were more likely to experience adverse effects: dizziness/light-headedness (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.87; 9 studies; low-certainty evidence), fatigue (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.51; 9 studies; low-certainty evidence), drowsiness (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.44; 8 studies) and depression (RR 3.28, 95% CI 1.30 to 8.27; 6 studies). Although the incidence rates were higher among participants receiving vigabatrin compared to those receiving placebo, the effect was not significant for the following adverse effects: ataxia (RR 2.76, 95% CI 0.96 to 7.94; 7 studies; very low-certainty evidence), nausea (RR 3.57, 95% CI 0.63 to 20.30; 4 studies), abnormal vision (RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.67 to 4.02; 5 studies; very low-certainty evidence), headache (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.92; 9 studies), diplopia (RR 1.76, 99% CI 0.94 to 3.30) and nystagmus (RR 1.53, 99% CI 0.62 to 3.76; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). Vigabatrin had little to no effect on cognitive outcomes or quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Vigabatrin may significantly reduce seizure frequency in people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. The results largely apply to adults and should not be extrapolated to children under 10 years old. Short-term follow-up of participants showed that some adverse effects were associated with its use. Analysis of longer-term observational studies elsewhere, however, has demonstrated that vigabatrin use can lead to the development of visual field defects.

Preventive Antiepileptic Treatment in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: A Long-Term, Prospective Trial

BACKGROUD

Drug-resistant epilepsy is the main risk factor for future intellectual disability in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Clinical epileptic seizures are often preceded by electroencephalographic changes, which provide an opportunity for preventive treatment. We evaluated the neuropsychologic and epilepsy outcomes at school age in children with tuberous sclerosis complex who received preventive antiepileptic treatment in infancy.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial with 14 infants diagnosed with tuberous sclerosis complex in whom serial electroencephalographic recordings were performed and preventive treatment with vigabatrin initiated when active epileptic discharges were detected. An age-matched control group consisted of 31 infants with tuberous sclerosis complex in whom treatment with vigabatrin was given only after onset of clinical seizures. Results of clinical assessment of epilepsy and cognitive outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients in the preventive group (n = 14) and 25 of 31 patients in the standard treatment group were followed through minimum age five years, median 8.8 and 8.0 years in the preventive and standard groups, respectively. The median intelligence quotient was 94 for the preventive group when compared with 46 for the standard group (P < 0.03). Seven of 14 patients (50%) in the preventive group never had a clinical seizure when compared with one of 25 patients (5%) in the standard treatment group (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that preventive antiepileptic treatment in infants with tuberous sclerosis complex improves long-term epilepsy control and cognitive outcome at school age.

Vigabatrin versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2012 (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 1).The efficacy and safety of vigabatrin (VGB) as an add-on therapy for refractory epilepsy have been well established. However, this information needs to be weighed against the risk of development of visual field defects. Whether VGB monotherapy is an effective and safe treatment compared with the standard antiepileptic drug carbamazepine (CBZ) as monotherapy for epilepsy has not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of VGB versus CBZ monotherapy for epilepsy in children and adults.

SEARCH METHODS

For the latest update, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015, Issue 3 of 4), MEDLINE (1948 to July 2015), EMBASE (1974 to July 2015) and the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1979 to July 2015). We searched trial registers and contacted the manufacturer of VGB and authors of included studies for additional information. We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing VGB versus CBZ monotherapy for epilepsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The primary outcome was time to treatment withdrawal. Secondary outcomes were time to achieve six-month and 12-month remission after randomisation, time to first seizure after randomisation and adverse events. We presented results as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) (time to event data) or as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs (adverse events).

MAIN RESULTS

Five studies involving a total of 734 participants were eligible for inclusion. We assessed only one study as good quality and the other four as poor quality. However, it was difficult to perform a meta-analysis by extracting aggregate data to synthesise the results as originally planned, mainly because not all studies reported the same outcomes as those chosen for this review. No significant differences favoured VGB or CBZ in terms of time to treatment withdrawal and time to achieve six-month remission after dose stabilisation from randomisation, but results did show a disadvantage for VGB on time to first seizure after randomisation. Compared with CBZ, VGB was associated with more occurrences of weight gain and fewer occurrences of skin rash and drowsiness. No differences in visual field defects and visual disturbances were noted.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Data are currently insufficient to address the risk-benefit balance of VGB versus CBZ monotherapy for epilepsy. Given the high prevalence of visual field defects reported in an existing systematic review of observational studies (Maguire 2010), VGB monotherapy should be prescribed with caution for epilepsy and should not be considered a first-line choice. If necessary, the visual field should be frequently assessed. Future research should focus on investigating the reasons for visual field defects and exploring potential prevention strategies. Moreover, future monotherapy studies of epilepsy should report results according to the recommendations of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Commission, and methodological quality should be improved.

The GABA transaminase, ABAT, is essential for mitochondrial nucleoside metabolism

ABAT is a key enzyme responsible for catabolism of principal inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). We report an essential role for ABAT in a seemingly unrelated pathway, mitochondrial nucleoside salvage, and demonstrate that mutations in this enzyme cause an autosomal recessive neurometabolic disorder and mtDNA depletion syndrome (MDS). We describe a family with encephalomyopathic MDS caused by a homozygous missense mutation in ABAT that results in elevated GABA in subjects' brains as well as decreased mtDNA levels in subjects' fibroblasts. Nucleoside rescue and co-IP experiments pinpoint that ABAT functions in the mitochondrial nucleoside salvage pathway to facilitate conversion of dNDPs to dNTPs. Pharmacological inhibition of ABAT through the irreversible inhibitor Vigabatrin caused depletion of mtDNA in photoreceptor cells that was prevented through addition of dNTPs in cell culture media. This work reveals ABAT as a connection between GABA metabolism and nucleoside metabolism and defines a neurometabolic disorder that includes MDS.

Does the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) accurately map visual field loss attributed to vigabatrin?

Background

Vigabatrin (VGB) is an anti-epileptic medication which has been linked to peripheral constriction of the visual field. Documenting the natural history associated with continued VGB exposure is important when making decisions about the risk and benefits associated with the treatment. Due to its speed the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) has become the algorithm of choice when carrying out Full Threshold automated static perimetry. SITA uses prior distributions of normal and glaucomatous visual field behaviour to estimate threshold sensitivity. As the abnormal model is based on glaucomatous behaviour this algorithm has not been validated for VGB recipients. We aim to assess the clinical utility of the SITA algorithm for accurately mapping VGB attributed field loss.

Methods

The sample comprised one randomly selected eye of 16 patients diagnosed with epilepsy, exposed to VGB therapy. A clinical diagnosis of VGB attributed visual field loss was documented in 44% of the group. The mean age was 39.3 years ± 14.5 years and the mean deviation was -4.76 dB ±4.34 dB. Each patient was examined with the Full Threshold, SITA Standard and SITA Fast algorithm.

Results

SITA Standard was on average approximately twice as fast (7.6 minutes) and SITA Fast approximately 3 times as fast (4.7 minutes) as examinations completed using the Full Threshold algorithm (15.8 minutes). In the clinical environment, the visual field outcome with both SITA algorithms was equivalent to visual field examination using the Full Threshold algorithm in terms of visual inspection of the grey scale plots , defect area and defect severity.

Conclusions

Our research shows that both SITA algorithms are able to accurately map visual field loss attributed to VGB. As patients diagnosed with epilepsy are often vulnerable to fatigue, the time saving offered by SITA Fast means that this algorithm has a significant advantage for use with VGB recipients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2415-14-166) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Vigabatrin retinal toxicity in children with infantile spasms: An observational cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To determine time to vigabatrin (VGB, Sabril; Lundbeck, Deerfield, IL) induced retinal damage in children with infantile spasms (IS) and to identify risk factors for VGB-induced retinal damage (VGB-RD).

METHODS

Observational cohort study including 146 participants (68 female, 81 male) with IS, an age-specific epilepsy syndrome of early infancy, treated with VGB. Participants ranged from 3 to 34.9 months of age (median 7.6 months). The median duration of VGB treatment was 16 months (range 4.6-78.5 months). Electroretinograms (ERGs) were performed according to the Standards of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. Inclusion required baseline (pre-VGB or within 4 weeks of starting VGB treatment) and at least 2 follow-up ERGs. Significant reduction from baseline of the 30-Hz ERG flicker amplitude on 2 consecutive visits identified VGB-RD. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses depicted the effect of duration of VGB on VGB-RD.

RESULTS

These data represent the largest survival analysis of children treated with VGB who did not succumb to retinal toxicity during the study. Thirty of the 146 participants (21%) showed VGB-RD. The ERG amplitude reduced with duration of VGB treatment (p = 0.0004) with no recovery after VGB cessation. With 6 and 12 months of VGB treatment, 5.3% and 13.3%, respectively, developed VGB-RD. There was neither effect of age of initiation of VGB treatment nor sex of the child on survival statistics and no significant effect of cumulative dosage on the occurrence of VGB-RD.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimizing VGB treatment to 6 months will reduce the prevalence of VGB-RD in patients with IS.

Adjunctive zonisamide therapy in the long-term treatment of children with partial epilepsy: results of an open-label extension study of a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety/tolerability and efficacy of long-term adjunctive zonisamide and its impact on growth and development in children (6-18 years) with partial epilepsy.

METHODS

Open-label extension of a phase III, placebo-controlled trial. Started with double-blind transition period (2-11 weeks), during which patients on zonisamide continued at the same dose and those on placebo switched to zonisamide 1 mg/kg/day, up-titrated to 8 mg/kg/day (maximum 500 mg/day). During the subsequent open-label period (45-57 weeks), zonisamide dosing could be adjusted according to tolerability/response. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), clinical laboratory parameters, and vital signs. Efficacy assessments included responder rate (primary assessment) and seizure freedom rate during the open-label period. Growth and development assessments comprised Tanner stages, hand x-rays, Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL 6/18), School Performance questionnaire, Physician and Parent/Guardian Global Impression of Change, and Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT).

RESULTS

One hundred forty-four children entered the study; 99 (68.8%) of 144 children completed it, and 108 (75.0%) of 144 received zonisamide for ≥1 year. TEAEs occurred in 39 (27.1%) of 144 patients. There were low incidences of serious TEAEs (2.1%) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation (2.8%). Bicarbonate level decreases >3.5 mm occurred in 64 patients (44.4%), and 24 patients (16.7%) had a weight decrease of ≥10% from baseline. During the open-label period, 81 (56.3%) of 144 patients were responders and 16 (11.1%) of 144 achieved seizure freedom. Tanner staging and skeletal development were as expected for the study population. Changes were minimal for CBCL 6/18 and School Performance scores. Most patients were "much improved"/"very much improved" on Physician (73.8%) and Parent/Guardian (75.4%) Global Impressions of Change. Median changes in COWAT Category and Letter Fluency scores were 2.0 and 0.5, respectively.

SIGNIFICANCE

Adjunctive zonisamide was well tolerated and efficacious over a period of at least 1 year in children with partial epilepsy, with no unexpected safety concerns and no consistent detrimental effects on growth and development. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section here.

Molecular mechanisms of antiseizure drug activity at GABAA receptors

The GABAA receptor (GABAAR) is a major target of antiseizure drugs (ASDs). A variety of agents that act at GABAARs s are used to terminate or prevent seizures. Many act at distinct receptor sites determined by the subunit composition of the holoreceptor. For the benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and loreclezole, actions at the GABAAR are the primary or only known mechanism of antiseizure action. For topiramate, felbamate, retigabine, losigamone and stiripentol, GABAAR modulation is one of several possible antiseizure mechanisms. Allopregnanolone, a progesterone metabolite that enhances GABAAR function, led to the development of ganaxolone. Other agents modulate GABAergic "tone" by regulating the synthesis, transport or breakdown of GABA. GABAAR efficacy is also affected by the transmembrane chloride gradient, which changes during development and in chronic epilepsy. This may provide an additional target for "GABAergic" ASDs. GABAAR subunit changes occur both acutely during status epilepticus and in chronic epilepsy, which alter both intrinsic GABAAR function and the response to GABAAR-acting ASDs. Manipulation of subunit expression patterns or novel ASDs targeting the altered receptors may provide a novel approach for seizure prevention.

Vigabatrin for refractory partial epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a common neurological condition which affects between 0.5% and 1% of the population. Approximately 30% of people with epilepsy do not respond to treatment with currently available drugs. The majority of these people have partial epilepsy. Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic drug licensed for use in the treatment of refractory epilepsy. No major side effects associated with the use of vigabatrin were detected by initial randomised controlled trials of the drug. However, longer-term observational studies have subsequently identified that its use is associated with asymptomatic visual field constriction.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to synthesise evidence from short-term, randomised, placebo-controlled trials of vigabatrin. We summarised the effects of vigabatrin on seizures and short-term side effects when used as an add-on treatment for people with drug-resistant partial epilepsy. A review of longer-term observational studies and estimates of proportions of patients developing visual field constrictions is currently being undertaken and results will be cited in this review in due course.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialised Register (12 October 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 9), MEDLINE (1946 to October week 1, 2012) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted the manufacturers of vigabatrin (Hoechst Marion Roussel).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fully published trials of vigabatrin in people with drug-resistant partial epilepsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data. Primary analysis was by intention-to-treat (ITT). Outcomes evaluated included 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, treatment withdrawal and side effects observable in the short term. Results are presented on the risk ratio (RR) scale with 95% or 99% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven suitable trials that tested vigabatrin doses between 1000 mg and 6000 mg were identified and included in the analysis. There were 982 observations on 747 patients in the primary ITT analysis of treatment efficacy. Patients treated with vigabatrin were significantly more likely to obtain a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency compared with those treated with placebo (RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.87 to 3.57). Those treated with vigabatrin were also significantly more likely to have treatment withdrawn (RR 2.49, 95% CI 1.05 to 5.88), and were more likely to experience a number of side effects, significantly so for fatigue or drowsiness. There was some evidence of small study effect bias, with smaller studies tending to report greater estimates of RR than larger studies. It is possible, therefore, that the actual RR of obtaining 50% reduction in seizure frequency is less than that obtained by a meta-analysis of fully published studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review of randomised controlled trials showed that vigabatrin can reduce seizure frequency in people with drug-resistant partial epilepsy. Short-term follow-up of patients showed that some side effects were associated with its use. Further analysis of longer-term observational studies is required to evaluate how likely patients are to develop visual field defects and whether such side effects are associated with dose and duration of drug use.

Adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs

More than 150 years after bromide was introduced as the first antiepileptic drug, adverse effects remain a leading cause of treatment failure and a major determinant of impaired health-related quality of life in people with epilepsy. Adverse effects can develop acutely or many years after starting treatment and can affect any organ or structure. In the past two decades, many efforts have been made to reduce the burden of antiepileptic drug toxicity. Several methods to screen and quantify adverse effects have been developed. Patient profiles associated with increased risk of specific adverse effects have been uncovered through advances in the areas of epidemiology and pharmacogenomics. Several new-generation antiepileptic drugs with improved tolerability profiles and reduced potential for drug interaction have been added to the therapeutic armamentarium. Overall, these advances have expanded the opportunities to tailor treatment with antiepileptic drugs, to enhance effectiveness and minimise the risk of toxic effects.

Balancing clinical benefits of vigabatrin with its associated risk of vision loss

Vigabatrin is an effective and well-tolerated antiepileptic drug (AED) for the treatment of refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS) and infantile spasms (IS), but its benefits must be evaluated in conjunction with its risk of retinopathy with the development of peripheral visual field defects (pVFDs). Vigabatrin should be considered for rCPS if a patient has failed appropriate trials of other AEDs or is not a suitable candidate for other AEDs, is not an optimal surgical candidate, and continues to experience debilitating effects from seizures. Vigabatrin is indicated as monotherapy for pediatric patients with IS. Its efficacy in achieving improved seizure control should be apparent within 12 weeks in patients with rCPS and within 2-4 weeks after attaining appropriate dosage for patients with IS. Because 12 weeks is well less than the known time of onset of visual defects, the risk of developing pVFDs may be minimized by discontinuing vigabatrin early during the course of therapy for patients with inadequate response. Appropriate vision screening is recommended at baseline, every 3 months during continued vigabatrin treatment, and at 3-6 months after discontinuation (if therapy has spanned more than a few months). If a pVFD is detected at any point and the decision is made to discontinue therapy, the pVFD is not likely to progress after discontinuation of vigabatrin. Although some patients will be at risk of retinopathy, vigabatrin is an appropriate treatment option for patients who achieve substantial clinical benefit, especially given the severe consequences of rCPS and uncontrolled IS. While retinopathy with the development of pVFDs is a serious adverse event, it is not life-threatening and its risk can be effectively managed.

Retinal and cochlear toxicity of drugs: new insights into mechanisms and detection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Various medications can modify the physiology of retinal and cochlear neurons and lead to major, sometime permanent, sensory loss. A better knowledge of pathogenic mechanisms and the establishment of relevant monitoring protocols are necessary to prevent permanent sensory impairment. In this article, we review main systemic medications associated with direct neuronal toxicity on the retina and cochlea, their putative pathogenic mechanisms, when identified, as well as current recommendations, when available, for monitoring protocols.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pathogenic mechanisms and cellular target of retinotoxic drugs are often not well characterized but a better knowledge of the course of visual defect has recently helped in defining more relevant monitoring protocols especially for antimalarials and vigabatrin. Mechanisms of ototoxicity have recently been better defined, from inner ear entry with the use of fluorescent tracers to evidence for the role of oxidative stress and program cell death pathways.

SUMMARY

Experimental and clinical studies have elucidated some of the pathogenic mechanisms, courses and risk factors of retinal toxicity and ototoxicity, which have led to establishment of relevant monitoring protocols. Further studies are, however, warranted to better understand cellular pathways leading to degeneration. These would help to build more efficient preventive intervention and may also contribute to understanding of other degenerative processes such as genetic disorders.

Vigabatrin versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of vigabatrin (VGB) as an add-on therapy for refractory epilepsy has been well established. However, this needs to be weighed against the risk of the development of visual field defects. Whether VGB monotherapy is an effective and safe treatment compared with the standard antiepileptic drug carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy for epilepsy has not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of VGB versus CBZ monotherapy for epilepsy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (10 October 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL Issue 4 of 4, The Cochrane Library 2011) and MEDLINE (1948 to week 4, September 2011), EMBASE (1974 to January 2011) and the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1979 to January 2011). We searched trials registers and contacted the manufacturer of VGB and authors of included studies for additional information. There were no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing VGB with CBZ monotherapy for epilepsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The primary outcome was time to treatment withdrawal. The secondary outcomes were time to achieve six- and 12-month remission after randomisation, time to first seizure after randomisation and adverse events. Results were presented as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) (time to event data) or risk ratio (RR) with 95%CI (adverse events).

MAIN RESULTS

Five studies involving a total of 734 participants were eligible for inclusion. We assessed only one study as having good quality while the other four were of poor quality. However, it was difficult to perform a meta-analysis by extracting aggregate data to synthesise the results as originally planned, mainly because not all the studies reported the same outcomes as those chosen for this review. There was no significant difference favouring either VGB or CBZ in terms of time to treatment withdrawal and time to achieve six-month remission after dose stabilisation from randomisation, but results did show a disadvantage for VGB on time to first seizure after randomisation. Compared with CBZ, taking VGB was associated with more occurrences of weight gain and less occurrences of skin rash and drowsiness. There were no differences in visual field defects and visual disturbances.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently insufficient data to address the risk-benefit balance of using VGB versus CBZ monotherapy for epilepsy. Considering the high prevalence of visual field defects, reported in an existing systematic review of observational studies (Maguire 2010), the prescribing of VGB monotherapy for epilepsy should be used with caution and not considered as a first-line choice. If necessary, a frequent assessment of visual field is needed. Future research should focus on investigating the reasons for visual field defects and exploring the potential prevention strategies. Moreover, future monotherapy studies of epilepsy should report results according to the recommendation of International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Commission, and methodological quality should be improved.

Understanding and interpreting vision safety issues with vigabatrin therapy

Vigabatrin is an irreversible inhibitor of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transaminase. It is effective as adjunctive therapy for adult patients with refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS) who have inadequately responded to several alternative treatments and as monotherapy for children aged 1 month to 2 years with infantile spasms. The well-documented safety profile of vigabatrin includes risk of retinopathy characterized by irreversible, bilateral, concentric peripheral visual field constriction. Thus, monitoring of visual function to understand the occurrence and manage the potential consequences of peripheral visual field defects (pVFDs) is now required for all patients who receive vigabatrin. However, screening for pVFDs for patients with epilepsy was conducted only after the association between vigabatrin and pVFDs was established. We examined the potential association between pVFDs and epilepsy in vigabatrin-naïve patients and attempted to identify confounding factors (e.g., concomitant medications, method of vision assessment) to more accurately delineate the prevalence of pVFDs directly associated with vigabatrin. Results of a prospective cohort study as well as several case series and case reports suggest that bilateral visual field constriction is not restricted to patients exposed to vigabatrin but has also been detected, although much less frequently, in vigabatrin-naïve patients with epilepsy, including those who received treatment with other GABAergic antiepileptic therapy. We also reviewed published data suggesting an association between vigabatrin-associated retinal toxicity and taurine deficiency, as well as the potential role of taurine in the prevention of this retinopathy.

Electrophysiological evaluation of retinal function in children receiving vigabatrin medication

PURPOSE

To evaluate retinal function in children taking vigabatrin and to explore the influence of age and dose parameters on the results of full-field electroretinography (ff-ERG).

METHODS

The ff-ERGs from 14 children receiving vigabatrin were compared with ff-ERGs from healthy controls. Treated children were further grouped according to age (pre-school = 12-71 months; older = 72-228 months). Parameters of drug dosage were compared.

RESULTS

Treated children showed rod and cone dysfunction reflected by reduced b-wave amplitudes for the isolated rod response, the combined rod-cone response, and the 30-Hz flicker response. The a-wave amplitude and implicit time for the combined rod-cone response, reflecting photoreceptor function, were also altered. Further evaluation of age groups revealed similar findings in the pre-school group but not in the older group. Alterations in ff-ERG were seen in 57% of the treated children. Pre-school children had received significantly higher daily drug doses with start of medication at younger age. No differences were found concerning cumulative doses or duration of medication.

CONCLUSION

Alterations in ff-ERG are as frequent in children as in adults and the results indicate that exposure to high daily doses of vigabatrin may be associated with increased risk of retinal dysfunction, including photoreceptor damage, not previously shown in children. Thus, recommendations of careful follow-up for children receiving vigabatrin are supported.

Modelling the topography of absolute defects in patients exposed to the anti-epileptic drug vigabatrin and in normal subjects using automated static suprathreshold perimetry of the entire 80° visual field

AIM

(i) To map the spatial distribution of absolute visual field loss (AL) in patients exposed to vigabatrin and to compare the findings with AL in normal individuals, and (ii) to describe the relationship between the major risk factors for absolute loss (gender, age, cumulative dose), and the severity of field loss, expressed as the number of locations with AL per eye.

METHODS

Visual field plots were retrospectively reviewed from 428 individuals. Perimetry was done with the Tübingen Automated Perimeter (using a threshold-oriented, marginally supraliminal strategy, 80° eccentricity, 99 test locations). Three hundred and sixty-one individuals were ophthalmologically normal, and 67 were patients exposed to vigabatrin who had performed reliably during perimetry prior to neurosurgery for epilepsy. Two hundred and sixty-six of the 361 normals were included on the empirical basis that they manifested AL at no more than 19 stimulus locations per eye (the 74th percentile). The frequency per eye of AL at each of 99 stimulus locations was determined for the normals and patients. The effects of age, gender and cumulative dose of vigabatrin on the number of ALs per individual was assessed by an analysis of covariance. A stochastic model was developed to determine the 50% probability of AL at each location.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine of the 67 vigabatrin patients exhibited at least 20 locations with AL. The number of ALs was independent of age (p  =  0.7603). The frequency of AL was 14.8% in the peripheral field and 1.0% in the central field (odds ratio 16.7; 95% CI 15.0-18.6%; p  <  0.0001). Those exposed to vigabatrin exhibited a frequency of 17.1% ALs, compared to 5.2% for the normal individuals (odds ratio 3.77, 95% CI 3.6-4.0%; p  <  0.0001). According to the modelled data, males exhibited 20.9% (95% CI 1.3-44%; p  =  0.0360) more absolute losses than did females. The number of absolute losses per person doubled with an increase in cumulative dose of vigabatrin of 936 g (95% CI 775-1181 g).

CONCLUSIONS

According to this retrospective study, the spatial configuration of absolute defects attributable to vigabatrin indicates sparing of the temporal field up to approximately 60° eccentricity. Such a finding is likely to explain, at least in part, the initially asymptomatic nature of the defect. This study reconfirms a (cumulative) dose effect of vigabatrin on the extent of absolute field loss, with a greater risk for male gender.

Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in vigabatrin-exposed patients

OBJECTIVE

Vigabatrin-associated visual field loss (VAVFL) occurs in 25 to 50% of exposed patients and is routinely monitored using perimetry, which has inherent limitations. Using optical coherence tomography (OCT), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning has been described in a small number of vigabatrin-exposed patients. We explored the relationship between RNFL thickness and visual field size, to determine whether OCT is a suitable tool to use in patients exposed to vigabatrin.

METHODS

Two hundred one vigabatrin-exposed subjects with epilepsy, divided into 2 groups, and 90 healthy controls participated. Visual fields were obtained using Goldmann kinetic perimetry and quantified using mean radial degrees (MRD). RNFL imaging was performed using either spectral-domain (Group 1) or time-domain (Group 2) OCT.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine of 201 (19.4%) patients were unable to perform perimetry. Thirteen (6.5%) patients were unable to perform OCT. A total of 51.6% of patients showed VAVFL. Average RNFL thickness was significantly thinner in patients (77.9 μm) compared to healthy controls (93.6 μm) (p < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between MRD and average RNFL thickness for Group 1 (r = 0.768, p < 0.001) and Group 2 (r = 0.814, p < 0.001). OCT RNFL imaging showed high repeatability.

INTERPRETATION

OCT provides a useful tool to assess people exposed to vigabatrin, and can provide an accurate estimate of the extent of visual field loss in the absence of a reliable direct measure of the visual field. The strong linear relationship found between RNFL thickness and visual field size provides some evidence that irreversible VAVFL may be related to loss of retinal ganglion cell axons.

[Characteristics of tuberous sclerosis in children]

Tuberous sclerosis complex is a genetic multisystem disease characterized by hamartic development of many organs, most notably the brain, heart, kidneys, lungs, and skin. This autosomic dominant disorder results from mutations in one of two genes, TSC1 and TSC2, coding for hamartin and tuberin, respectively. The hamartin-tuberin complex inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, which controls cell growth and proliferation. The clinical presentation is highly variable and most features of tuberous sclerosis become evident only in childhood after the child is several years of age, limiting their usefulness for early diagnosis. The aim of this article is to define the pediatric clinical manifestations of tuberous sclerosis in correlation with patient age. Sometimes, a prenatal diagnosis can be made based on fetal ultrasound and MRI, which show cardiac and brain lesions. However, newborns are most often asymptomatic. In the 1st year, seizures are the most common symptoms, with a high incidence of infantile spasms. In children between 2 and 10 years of age, neurological symptoms are the most frequent with epilepsy, mental retardation, and autism, but extraneurological manifestations can be diagnosed. In adolescents, most features of tuberous sclerosis become evident and renal and pulmonary manifestations must be sought. The knowledge of age-dependent clinical features of tuberous sclerosis can provide an earlier diagnosis and improve the management of these patients with a special role for multidisciplinary consultation.

Vigabatrin's complicated journey--to be or not to be?

Visual Fields at School-Age in Children Treated with Vigabatrin in Infancy. Gaily E, Jonsson H, Lappi M. Epilepsia 2009;50(2):206–216. PURPOSE: The use of vigabatrin (VGB) as an antiepileptic drug (AED) has been limited by evidence showing that it causes vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss (VAVFL) in at least 20–40% of patients exposed at school age or later. VGB is an effective drug for infantile spasms, but there are no reports on later visual field testing after such treatment. Our aim was to investigate the risk of VAVFL in school-age children who had received VGB in infancy. METHODS: Visual fields of 16 children treated with VGB for infantile spasms were examined by Goldmann kinetic perimetry at age 6–12 years. Normal fields were defined as the temporal meridian extending to more than 70°, and mild VAVFL between 50 and 70°. Abnormal findings were always confirmed by repeating the test. Exposure data were collected from hospital charts. RESULTS: Vigabatrin was started at a mean age of 7.6 (range, 3.2–20.3) months. The mean duration of therapy was 21.0 (9.3–29.8) months and cumulative dose 655 g (209–1,109 g). Eight children were never treated with other AEDs, five received only adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) in addition to VGB, and three children had been treated with other AEDs. Fifteen children had normal visual fields. Mild VAVFL was observed in one child (6%) who had been treated with VGB for 19 months and who received a cumulative dose of 572 g. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of VAVFL may be lower in children who are treated with VGB in infancy compared to patients who receive VGB at a later age.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Abnormalities Associated with Vigabatrin in Patients with Epilepsy. Wheless JW, Carmant L, Bebin M, Conry JA, Chiron C, Elterman RD, Frost M, Paolicchi JM, Donald Shields W, Thiele EA, Zupanc ML, Collins SD. Epilepsia 2009;50(2):195–205. PURPOSE: Vigabatrin used to treat infantile spasms (IS) has been associated with transient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities. We carried out a retrospective review to better characterize the frequency of those abnormalities in IS and in children and adults treated with vigabatrin for refractory complex partial seizures (CPS). METHODS: Medical records and 332 cranial MRIs from 205 infants (aged ≤24 months) with IS treated at 10 sites in the United States and Canada were collected. Similarly, 2,074 images from 668 children (aged 2–16 years) and adults (aged >16 years) with CPS were re-reviewed. Prespecified MRI abnormalities were defined as any hyperintensity on T2-weighted or fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) sequences with or without diffusion restriction not readily explained by a radiographically well-characterized pathology. MRIs were read by two neuroradiologists blinded to treatment group. The incidence and prevalence of MRI abnormalities associated with vigabatrin were estimated. RESULTS: Among infants with IS, the prevalence of prespecified MRI abnormalities was significantly higher among vigabatrin-treated versus vigabatrin-naive subjects (22% vs. 4%; p < 0.001). Of nine subjects in the prevalence population with at least one subsequent determinate MRI, resolution of MRI abnormalities occurred in six (66.7%)—vigabatrin was discontinued in four. Among adults and children treated with vigabatrin for CPS, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence or prevalence of prespecified MRI abnormalities between vigabatrin-exposed and vigabatrin-naive subjects. DISCUSSION: Vigabatrin is associated with transient, asymptomatic MRI abnormalities in infants treated for IS. The majority of these MRI abnormalities resolved, even in subjects who remained on vigabatrin therapy.

The safety and tolerability of newer antiepileptic drugs in children and adolescents

The newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) provide more therapeutic options and overall improved safety and tolerability for patients. To provide the best care, physicians must be familiar with the latest tolerability and safety data. This is particularly true in children, given there are relatively fewer studies examining the effects of AEDs in children compared with adults. Since we now have significant paediatric literature on each of these agents, we provide a comprehensive and current literature review of the newer AEDs, focusing on safety and tolerability data in children and adolescents. Because the safety profiles in children differ from those in adults, familiarity with this literature is important for child neurologists and other paediatric caregivers. We have organized the data by organ system for each AED for easier reference.

Anti-epileptic drugs: a guide for the non-neurologist

Epilepsy is the most common serious chronic neurological disorder affecting between 0.5% and 1% of Western populations. Most patients take anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) for years if not decades, and are commonly admitted to hospital with seizures. Many have symptomatic epilepsy, arising as a consequence of another disorder, for example a brain tumour. General practitioners, emergency physicians and most hospital teams (especially general medicine) commonly encounter difficulties surrounding AEDs yet often require assistance from neurology services. This can be difficult when neurology services are not on-site or easily available. This article gives a practical overview of difficulties relating to AEDs and their management, with the focus on problems commonly encountered by non-neurologists. These include the patient who is acutely unwell, pregnant or elderly; AED side effects and drug interactions; status epilepticus and AED blood levels.

Favourable prognostic factors with infantile spasms

The following aspects are reviewed: Does the aetiology influence the outcome of infantile spasms? Does the treatment influence the outcome? Can the outcome be predicted? Can we improve the prognosis? Favourable factors are the following: cryptogenic aetiology, age at onset > or =4 months, absence of atypical spasms and partial seizures, and absence of asymmetrical EEG abnormalities, short treatment lag, and an early and sustained response to treatment. Not only patients with a cryptogenic aetiology have a favourable outcome. We can already at the first clinical evaluation tell the parents if the prognosis looks favourable. The final goal of the treatment is improved mental outcome. Steroids and vigabatrin are the first-line drugs for infantile spasms in Europe. In a prospective study from the United Kingdom short-term outcome was better with hormonal than with vigabatrin therapy (tuberous sclerosis excluded). However, the numbers of patients who were seizure-free at 3-4 months in different studies have been very similar. Moreover, an early response to treatment seems to be of predictive value for the cognitive outcome in children with cryptogenic spasms. The long-term outcome is known only after hormonal therapy. The side effects of steroids are usually treatable and reversible. In Finland ACTH therapy is given at the minimum effective dose and for the minimum effective time with minimal side effects. The risks of VGB are irreversible visual field defects. As of yet there is no method to examine the visual fields in patients with infantile spasms. Early treatment of infantile spasms seems to be important. Prevention of infantile spasms with some aetiological groups might be possible.

Definition of drug resistant epilepsy: consensus proposal by the ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies

To improve patient care and facilitate clinical research, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) appointed a Task Force to formulate a consensus definition of drug resistant epilepsy. The overall framework of the definition has two "hierarchical" levels: Level 1 provides a general scheme to categorize response to each therapeutic intervention, including a minimum dataset of knowledge about the intervention that would be needed; Level 2 provides a core definition of drug resistant epilepsy using a set of essential criteria based on the categorization of response (from Level 1) to trials of antiepileptic drugs. It is proposed as a testable hypothesis that drug resistant epilepsy is defined as failure of adequate trials of two tolerated, appropriately chosen and used antiepileptic drug schedules (whether as monotherapies or in combination) to achieve sustained seizure freedom. This definition can be further refined when new evidence emerges. The rationale behind the definition and the principles governing its proper use are discussed, and examples to illustrate its application in clinical practice are provided.

Visual field loss in patients with refractory partial epilepsy treated with vigabatrin: final results from an open-label, observational, multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Use of the antiepileptic drug vigabatrin is associated with an elevated risk of visual field loss.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of, and risk factors for, vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss (VAVFL) in the setting of a large-scale, multinational, prospective, observational study.

STUDY DESIGN

A comparative, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study.

SETTING

Hospital outpatient clinics at 46 centres in five countries.

PATIENTS

734 patients with refractory partial epilepsy, divided into three groups and stratified by age (8-12 years; >12 years) and exposure to vigabatrin. Group I comprised patients treated with vigabatrin for > or =6 months. Group II comprised patients previously treated with vigabatrin for > or =6 months who had withdrawn from the drug for > or =6 months. Group III comprised patients never treated with vigabatrin. Patients underwent perimetry at either 4- or 6-month intervals, for up to 36 months. Visual field outcome was evaluated masked to drug exposure.

INTERVENTION

Perimetry.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The visual field outcome at each of four analysis points: (i) at enrolment (i.e. baseline, all patients); (ii) for patients exhibiting a conclusive outcome at the initial visual field examination; (iii) for patients exhibiting at least one conclusive outcome to the visual field examinations; and (iv) at the last conclusive outcome to the visual field examinations.

RESULTS

Of the 734 patients, 524 yielded one or more conclusive visual field examinations. For Group I, the frequency of VAVFL at the last conclusive examination was 10/38 (26.3%) for those aged 8-12 years and 65/150 (43.3%) for those aged >12 years. For Group II, the respective frequencies were 7/47 (14.9%) and 37/151 (24.5%). One case resembling VAVFL was present amongst the 186 patients in Group III at the last conclusive examination. The frequency of VAVFL in Groups I and II combined was 20.0% for those aged 8-12 years and 33.9% for those aged >12 years. VAVFL was associated with duration of vigabatrin therapy (odds ratio [OR] up to 15.2; 95% CI 4.4, 51.7), mean daily dose of vigabatrin (OR up to 26.4; 95% CI 2.4, 291.7) and male gender (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.5, 4.1). VAVFL was more frequently detected with static than with kinetic perimetry (OR up to 0.43; 95% CI 0.24, 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Since the probability of VAVFL is positively associated with treatment duration, careful assessment of the risk-benefit ratio of continuing treatment with vigabatrin is recommended in patients currently receiving this drug. All patients continuing to receive vigabatrin should undergo visual field examination at least every 6 months for the duration of treatment. We recommend two-level (three-zone), gradient-adapted, suprathreshold static perimetry of the peripheral field together with threshold perimetry of the central field out to 30 degrees from fixation. The frequency of ophthalmological and perimetric examinations should be increased in the presence of VAVFL.

Binasal visual field defects are not specific to vigabatrin

This study investigated the visual defects associated with the antiepileptic drug vigabatrin (VGB). Two hundred four people with epilepsy were grouped on the basis of antiepileptic drug therapy (current, previous, or no exposure to VGB). Groups were matched with respect to age, gender, and seizure frequency. All patients underwent objective assessment of electrophysiological function (wide-field multifocal electroretinography) and conventional visual field testing (static perimetry). Bilateral visual field constriction was observed in 59% of patients currently taking VGB, 43% of patients who previously took VGB, and 24% of patients with no exposure to VGB. Assessment of retinal function revealed abnormal responses in 48% of current VGB users and 22% of prior VGB users, but in none of the patients without previous exposure to VGB. Bilateral visual field abnormalities are common in the treated epilepsy population, irrespective of drug history. Assessment by conventional static perimetry may neither be sufficiently sensitive nor specific to reliably identify retinal toxicity associated with VGB.

Epilepsy pharmacogenetics

Large interindividual variation in efficacy and adverse effects of anti-epileptic therapy presents opportunities and challenges in pharmacogenomics. Although the first true association of genetic polymorphism in drug-metabolizing enzymes with anti-epileptic drug dose was reported 10 years ago, most of the findings have had little impact on clinical practice so far. Most studies performed to date examined candidate genes and were focused on candidate gene selection. Genome-wide association and whole-genome sequencing technologies empower hypothesis-free comprehensive screening of genetic variation across the genome and now the main challenge remaining is to select and study clinically relevant phenotypes suitable for genetic studies. Here we review the current state of epilepsy pharmacogenetics focusing on phenotyping questions and discuss what characteristics we need to study to get answers.

Utilization and costs of antiepileptic drugs in the elderly: still an unsolved issue

The aging of the general population in industrialized countries has brought to public attention the increasing incidence of age- and aging-related clinical conditions. Management of multiple and chronic disorders has become a more important issue for healthcare authorities because of increasing requests for medical assistance, the greater numbers of drugs required and drug interactions reported, and the increase in treatment-related costs. Epilepsy is a chronic clinical condition affecting both sexes and all ages with a worldwide distribution. The incidence of epilepsy, after childhood, increases with age and the cumulative risk of epilepsy by 80 years of age ranges from 1.3% to 4% in different study populations. Although the issues for people with epilepsy are similar for older and younger adults, the elderly may require more attention with regard to selection of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) than younger patients. Elderly patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy are more likely to remain seizure-free on AED therapy than younger populations; however, the toxicity of AEDs in elderly patients is ill-defined because seizures may be difficult to recognize in this group and the symptoms and signs of toxicity can be attributed to other causes. Moreover, elderly people have chronic clinical conditions and are more likely to be taking medications that could possibly interfere with AEDs.Some older AEDs such as phenobarbital and phenytoin should not be used in the elderly because of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. There is no evidence that new AEDs, despite their better tolerability profiles, are advantageous in terms of attaining freedom from seizures compared with older agents.Older AEDs are much less expensive than the new compounds and, with some exceptions, appear to be more cost effective. New AEDs may be cost effective only in patients who are not able to tolerate or who are resistant to older compounds or when the use of an older drug is contraindicated. However, there are no cost-effectiveness studies in the elderly and further evidence is needed to confirm these assumptions.

Transient brain magnetic resonance imaging hyperintensity in basal ganglia and brain stem of epileptic infants treated with vigabatrin

Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic drug that produces intramyelinic edema in several animal models. This study investigates the effect of vigabatrin on the developing human brain. The authors retrospectively blindly review 34 brain magnetic resonance imaging of 22 epileptic infants (age: 9 +/- 1 months) that received vigabatrin, focusing on the presence of hyperintensity on T2- and diffusion-weighted images. Patients treated with vigabatrin displayed significant magnetic resonance imaging hyperintensity of basal ganglia and brain stem (P < .001, Wilcoxon test). This hyperintensity was transient and maximal 3 to 6 months after the beginning of vigabatrin. Hyperintensity was independent from duration and type of epilepsy, and from the presence or absence of seizures. The authors conclude that vigabatrin treatment is associated with transient hypersignal of the basal ganglia and brain stem in epileptic infants. Such transient hyperintensity is likely to be age-dependent and time-dependent because it has never been observed in adult patients.

Cholecystokinin-8 sulfate modulates the anticonvulsant efficacy of vigabatrin in an experimental model of partial complex epilepsy in the rat

PURPOSE

We evaluated the possible additive effect induced by the administration of the anticonvulsant vigabatrin (VGB) and cholecystokinin-8 sulfate (CCK-8S) on an experimental model of partial complex seizures (maximal dentate gyrus activation, MDA). Moreover, the functional involvement of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmission was tested by iontophoretically administering bicuculline (GABA receptor antagonist) in the dentate gyrus.

METHODS

Urethane anesthetized rats were pretreated with VGB (50, 100 or 200 mg/kg, i.p.) or CCK-8S (8 nmol/kg, i.p.) alone or coadministered with VGB (50 mg/kg, i.p.). Dentate gyrus epileptic activity was obtained through the repetitive electrical stimulation of the angular bundle. MDA latency, duration, and poststimulus afterdischarge (AD) duration were evaluated. The extracellular activity of some dentate neurons was recorded before and during bicuculline iontophoresis.

RESULTS

Only the higher dose of VGB reduced the mean duration of dentate MDA and AD. CCK-8S significantly decreased the number of animals exhibiting MDA responses, characterized by increased latency and shorter duration. The coadministration of CCK-8S and VGB (50 mg/kg) significantly increased the anticonvulsant effects, either reducing the number of responding animals or decreasing both MDA and AD durations. During bicuculline iontophoresis, all the modifications induced on the MDA-related activity of dentate neurons by the pretreatments (VGB and/or CCK-8S) were abolished.

DISCUSSION

The results indicate that CCK-8S significantly enhances the VGB-induced anticonvulsant effect in the MDA model of partial epilepsy, probably through an increase of GABA cerebral levels. Such increased anticonvulsant effect becomes evident by using VGB at a lower dose.

Nasal retinal nerve fiber layer attenuation: a biomarker for vigabatrin toxicity

PURPOSE

To investigate whether nasal peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) attenuation is associated with visual field loss attributed to the anti-epileptic drug vigabatrin.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-seven individuals with focal-onset epilepsy exposed to vigabatrin and 13 individuals with focal-onset epilepsy exposed to non-GABAergic anti-epileptic drug monotherapy.

METHODS

At one visit, suprathreshold perimetry of the central and peripheral field (3-zone, age-corrected Full Field 135 Screening Test) and threshold perimetry of the central field (Program 30-2 and the FASTPAC strategy) were undertaken using the Humphrey Field Analyzer (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Dublin, CA). At a second visit, ocular coherence tomography was undertaken for the right eye using the 3.4 RNFL thickness protocol of the StratusOCT (Carl Zeiss Meditech).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The magnitude, for each individual, of the RNFL thickness, averaged across the 4 oblique quadrants, and for each separate quadrant.

RESULTS

Of the 27 individuals exposed to vigabatrin, 11 (group I) exhibited vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss, 15 exhibited a normal field, and 1 exhibited a homonymous quadrantanopia (group II). All 13 individuals exposed to non-GABAergic therapy had normal fields (group III). All individuals in group I exhibited abnormal average and nasal quadrant RNFL thicknesses in the presence of a normal temporal quadrant thickness. Most also exhibited additional RNFL attenuation in either the superior or inferior quadrant, or both. Four individuals in group II exhibited an identical pattern of RNFL attenuation suggesting that nasal RNFL thinning is a more sensitive marker for vigabatrin toxicity than visual field loss. None of the 13 individuals in group III exhibited nasal quadrant RNFL attenuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss is associated with a characteristic pattern of RNFL attenuation: nasal quadrant thinning and normal temporal quadrant thickness with, or without, superior or inferior quadrant involvement. Nasal attenuation may precede visual field loss. Ocular coherence tomography of the peripapillary RNFL should be considered in patients previously exposed to vigabatrin. It should also be considered at baseline and follow-up in those commencing vigabatrin for treatment of epilepsy or in trials for anti-addiction therapy. The pattern of RNFL thinning seems to be a useful biomarker to identify vigabatrin toxicity.

Treatment of refractory complex partial seizures: role of vigabatrin

Vigabatrin (VGB) is an antiepileptic drug that was designed to inhibit GABA-transaminase, and increase levels of gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA), a major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain. VGB has demonstrated efficacy as an adjunctive antiepileptic drug for refractory complex partial seizures (CPS) and for infantile spasms (IS). This review focuses on its use for complex partial seizures. Although VGB is well tolerated, there have been significant safety concerns about intramyelinic edema and visual field defects. VGB is associated with a risk of developing bilateral concentric visual field defects. Therefore, the use of VGB for complex partial seizures should be limited to those patients with seizures refractory to other treatments. Patients must have baseline and follow-up monitoring of visual fields, early assessment of its efficacy, and ongoing evaluation of the benefits and risks of VGB therapy.

Vigabatrin for refractory partial epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a common neurological condition which affects between 0.5% and 1% of the population. Approximately 30% of people with epilepsy do not respond to treatment with currently available drugs, and the majority of these people have partial epilepsy. Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic drug licensed for use in the treatment of refractory epilepsy. No major side effects associated with the use of vigabatrin were detected by initial randomised controlled trials of the drug. However, longer term observational studies have subsequently identified that its use is associated with asymptomatic visual field constriction.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to synthesise evidence from short-term, randomised, placebo-controlled trials of vigabatrin. We summarise the effects of vigabatrin on seizures and short-term side effects when used as an add-on treatment for people with drug-resistant partial epilepsy. A review of longer term observational studies and estimates of proportions of patients developing visual field constrictions is currently being undertaken and results will be cited here in due course.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2008), MEDLINE (1950-March 2008), and reference lists of articles. We also contacted the manufacturers of vigabatrin (Hoechst Marion Roussel).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fully published trials of vigabatrin, in people with drug-resistant partial epilepsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data. Primary analysis was by intention-to-treat (ITT). Outcomes evaluated included 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, treatment withdrawal and side effects observable in the short term. Results are presented on the relative risk (RR) scale with 95 or 99% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven suitable trials, testing doses between 1000 mg and 6000 mg, were identified and included in the analysis. There were 982 observations on 747 patients in the primary ITT analysis of treatment efficacy. Patients treated with vigabatrin were significantly more likely to obtain a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency compared with those treated with placebo (RR 2.58 (95% CI 1.87 to 3.57)). Those treated with vigabatrin were also significantly more likely to have treatment withdrawn (RR 2.49 (95% CI 1.05 to 5.88)), and more likely to experience a number of side effects, significantly so for fatigue or drowsiness. There was some evidence of small study effect bias, with smaller studies tending to report greater estimates of RR than larger studies. It is possible that the actual relative risk of obtaining 50% reduction in seizure frequency may therefore be less than that obtained by a meta-analysis of fully published studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review of randomised controlled trials shows that vigabatrin can reduce seizure frequency in people with drug-resistant partial epilepsy. Short-term follow up of patients shows some side effects are associated with its use. Further analysis of longer term observational studies is required to evaluate how likely patients are to develop visual field defects, and whether such side effects are associated with dose and duration of drug use.

In utero exposure to vigabatrin: no indication of visual field loss

The purpose of the study was to determine whether in utero exposure to vigabatrin caused visual field loss. Three mothers with four children who had been exposed to vigabatrin in utero and who were subsequently formula fed were identified. All seven individuals underwent perimetry and imaging of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL). All individuals yielded reliable outcomes to perimetry and RNFL images of acceptable quality. Two of the three mothers exhibited vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss and an abnormally attenuated RNFL. The third exhibited an upper left quadrantanopia, consistent with previous temporal lobe surgery, and a normal RNFL. All four children yielded normal visual fields and RNFL thicknesses. The presence of the normal findings for the children is reassuring and, if representative, suggests a lack of vigabatrin visual toxicity and therefore obviates the need for ophthalmological examination of those exposed to vigabatrin prenatally.