Consequences of antiepileptic drug withdrawal: a randomized, double-blind study (Akershus Study)

Evolution of epilepsy comorbidities in seizure free patients: Is no seizure a synonym of no epilepsy?

Epilepsy is a prevalent neurological disorder, with most patients achieving seizure freedom through antiseizure medications (ASM). However, being seizure-free does not necessarily equate to being free from epilepsy-related comorbidities. This review explores the persistence of psychiatric, cognitive, and social challenges in seizure-free patients and their impact on quality of life (QoL). Seizure-free patients generally report a better QoL than those with active epilepsy, with scores approaching those of the general population. However, detailed analyses reveal impairments in specific subdomains, such as emotional well-being, energy levels, and employment concerns. The most significant determinants of QoL in seizure-free patients include ASM side effects, psychiatric symptoms, and social functioning. Notably, polytherapy is associated with a poorer QoL. After epilepsy surgery, improvements in QoL are well documented, especially in the first two years postoperatively. However, for some patients, achieving seizure freedom does not necessarily result in significant QoL improvements, often due to persistent psychiatric or cognitive impairments. Psychiatric comorbidities, particularly depression and anxiety, remain a significant determinant of QoL in seizure-free patients, sometimes exerting a greater influence than seizure control itself. Depression is significantly more prevalent in patients treated with ASMs, especially those on polytherapy. After surgery, 15-45% of patients achieve remission from psychiatric disorders, particularly those who become seizure-free. Cognitive deficits could persist in seizure-free patients, particularly in those on ASMs. Studies have reported impairments in verbal fluency, memory, and processing speed, especially in patients with magnetic resonance imaging lesions or early epilepsy onset. ASM withdrawal has been associated with improved verbal fluency, psychomotor speed, and attention in some patients, but not necessarily in overall QoL. After epilepsy surgery, cognitive outcomes vary, with verbal memory decline being the most concerning effect, particularly after left-sided resections. However, some patients experience cognitive improvements, particularly in executive functioning and IQ in children. Importantly, QoL improvements post-surgery are generally independent of cognitive changes, as long as seizure control is achieved. Seizure freedom positively impacts employment, with studies reporting that seizure-free patients are significantly more likely to obtain or retain full-time employment. However, barriers remain, including stigma and employer perceptions of epilepsy. Driving ability is crucial to patient independence, with up to 80% of seizure-free patients regaining their license. While most seizure-free patients achieve financial and residential independence, social adaptation can be challenging. Some patients and families struggle with the "burden of normality," which describes difficulties adjusting to life without epilepsy. This can lead to strained family dynamics and, in some cases, divorce. Achieving seizure freedom is a critical goal, but it is not synonymous with complete recovery from epilepsy-related burdens. A comprehensive approach, including psychiatric, cognitive, and social assessments, is essential to optimize the well-being of seizure-free patients.

Seizure recurrence proportion under antiseizure medication in people living with epilepsy and prolonged seizure remission: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

People living with epilepsy (PLWE) may wish to discontinue antiseizure medications (ASMs) after long-term remission. However, fear of relapse may lead to continued ASM use. Previous studies have focused on seizure relapse in PLWE who discontinued ASMs after long-term seizure remission (PLWE off ASM), with limited data on those who continued ASMs (PLWE on ASM).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from five databases. We included studies with adult PLWE on ASM with long-term follow-up, using a common-effect model for analysis.

RESULTS

Seven datasets from six studies were reviewed. Three of the six studies appeared to include some children and adolescents. Significant differences in seizure recurrence proportions (SRP) were found between PLWE whose seizures were controlled on one ASM (PLWE on one ASM) and those whose seizures were controlled on multiple ASMs (PLWE on multiple ASMs) over one to five years of follow-up. After two years, the SRP was 0.1416 for PLWE on one ASM and 0.2479 for PLWE on multiple ASMs. The relative risk (RR) of seizure recurrence for PLWE off ASM compared to PLWE on ASM was 1.9912 after two years, with the RR decreasing over time.

DISCUSSION

Among PLWE on ASM, PLWE on one ASM have a lower chance of seizure recurrence than PLWE on multiple ASMs. PLWE off ASM have twice the risk of recurrence compared to PLWE on ASM after two years. This information aids PLWE in making informed decisions about ASM continuation or discontinuation.

[Discontinuation of antiseizure medication in patients with epilepsy]

BACKGROUND

Approximately two thirds of patients with epilepsy become seizure-free with antiseizure medication (ASM). A central question is whether and when ASM can be discontinued.

OBJECTIVE

To present an overview of the current knowledge about risks and benefits of discontinuation of ASM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Review of the current literature, discussion of data on and recommendations for discontinuation of ASM.

RESULTS

The risk of seizure recurrence after discontinuation of ASM is approximately 40-50% and thus twice as high as continuing with ASM. Guidelines recommend considering discontinuation of ASM at earliest after a seizure-free period of 2 years. Predictive variables for seizure recurrence after stopping ASM include longer duration of epilepsy and higher number of seizures until remission, a shorter seizure-free interval until stopping ASM, older age at epilepsy onset, developmental delay or IQ < 70, febrile seizures in childhood, absence of a self-limiting epilepsy syndrome, and evidence of epileptiform activity in the electroencephalograph (EEG). The individual risk of seizure recurrence after stopping ASM can be estimated using an online prediction tool.

CONCLUSION

Discontinuation of ASM should be discussed with patients at the earliest after 2 years of seizure freedom in a shared decision-making process weighing up the risks and benefits. The risk of a seizure recurrence depends on a number of clinical variables. Psychosocial aspects, such as impact on driving and occupational issues must be taken into consideration as well as individual fears and concerns of patients about seizure recurrence or the long-term use of ASM.

Exit Strategy: Balancing the Risks and Rewards of Antiseizure Medication Withdrawal

The majority of people with epilepsy achieves long-term seizure-freedom and may consider withdrawal of their anti-seizure medications (ASMs). Withdrawal of ASMs can yield substantial benefits but may be associated with potential risks. This review critically examines the existing literature on ASM withdrawal, emphasizing evidence-based recommendations, where available. Our focus encompasses deprescribing strategies for individuals who have attained seizure freedom through medical treatment, those who have undergone successful epilepsy surgery, and individuals initiated on ASMs following acute symptomatic seizures. We explore state-of-the-art prognostic models in these scenarios that could guide the decision-making process. The review underscores the importance of a collaborative shared-decision approach between patients, caregivers, and physicians. We describe the subjective and objective factors influencing these decisions and illustrate how trade-offs may be effectively managed in practice.

Increasing histone acetylation improves sociability and restores learning and memory in KAT6B-haploinsufficient mice

Mutations in genes encoding chromatin modifiers are enriched among mutations causing intellectual disability. The continuing development of the brain postnatally, coupled with the inherent reversibility of chromatin modifications, may afford an opportunity for therapeutic intervention following a genetic diagnosis. Development of treatments requires an understanding of protein function and models of the disease. Here, we provide a mouse model of Say-Barber-Biesecker-Young-Simpson syndrome (SBBYSS) (OMIM 603736) and demonstrate proof-of-principle efficacy of postnatal treatment. SBBYSS results from heterozygous mutations in the KAT6B (MYST4/MORF/QFK) gene and is characterized by intellectual disability and autism-like behaviors. Using human cells carrying SBBYSS-specific KAT6B mutations and Kat6b heterozygous mice (Kat6b+/-), we showed that KAT6B deficiency caused a reduction in histone H3 lysine 9 acetylation. Kat6b+/- mice displayed learning, memory, and social deficits, mirroring SBBYSS individuals. Treatment with a histone deacetylase inhibitor, valproic acid, or an acetyl donor, acetyl-carnitine (ALCAR), elevated histone acetylation levels in the human cells with SBBYSS mutations and in brain and blood cells of Kat6b+/- mice and partially reversed gene expression changes in Kat6b+/- cortical neurons. Both compounds improved sociability in Kat6b+/- mice, and ALCAR treatment restored learning and memory. These data suggest that a subset of SBBYSS individuals may benefit from postnatal therapeutic interventions.

Fluvoxamine Ameliorates the Damage to the Neuro-Behavioral Status of Rats Caused by the Administration of Valproic Acid by Preventing Cognitive Memory Deficits and Decreased Hippocampal Cellular Proliferation

Fluvoxamine is a major antidepressant of the selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor class, previously studied as a drug that improves cognitive memory by enhancing hippocampal cell division and proliferation. Valproic acid (VPA) is a commonly used antiepileptic drug and mood stabilizer that has negative effects on cognitive memory as it inhibits cellular division and proliferation in the hippocampus. This study assessed the protective effects of fluvoxamine treatment versus the memory impairment, decreased hippocampal cellular proliferation, and weight loss produced by VPA treatment. The cognitive memory of 40 male Sprague-Dawley rats was assessed by the novel object location (NOL) test. Immunostaining by Ki67 and glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX-1) was performed to quantify the number of dividing cells in the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the dentate gyrus and to assess the antioxidant activity of different treatments, respectively. Results showed that the VPA group had fewer Ki67-positive cells than the control group (p < 0.001), indicating reduced hippocampal proliferation. In contrast, the VPA and fluvoxamine combination group showed increased proliferation (p < 0.001) compared to VPA alone. Notably, fluvoxamine treatment significantly differed in cell counts compared to other groups (p < 0.001). Fluvoxamine also attenuated the weight loss caused by VPA (p < 0.0001). Our data suggested that fluvoxamine therapy attenuated the VPA-induced decrease in SGZ cellular proliferation, memory, and weight in rats.

Non-discontinuation of antiseizure medication in seizure-free epilepsy patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In patients with epilepsy and sustained seizure freedom, guidelines recommend considering discontinuation of antiseizure medication (ASM) based on shared decision-making. This study aims to identify factors associated with non-discontinuation of ASM in seizure-free patients.

METHODS

Retrospective data from three sites of an academic outpatient clinic were analyzed. Adult patients with epilepsy who have been seizure-free for ≥24 months on ASM monotherapy were included. The primary end-point was non-discontinuation of ASM, defined as no discontinuation or no dose reduction of ≥25% at the last outpatient clinic visit in the ultimate seizure-free interval. Secondary end-points included frequency of discussion on discontinuation attempts between patients and physicians, adherence to ASM discontinuation decisions, and post-discontinuation seizure outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of 338 included patients, 81.7% did not discontinue ASM and did not reduce its dose, 11.5% discontinued ASM and 6.8% had a significant dose reduction. Factors independently associated with non-discontinuation of ASM were history of focal to bilateral or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (odds ratio [OR] 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-5.06), history of breakthrough seizures (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.10-10.04), history of failed attempts to discontinue or reduce the ASM dose (OR 4.67, 95% CI 1.03-21.11) and higher ASM load at the index visit (OR 6.10, 95% CI 2.09-17.78). Discontinuation attempts were made during the entire period of seizure freedom and were most commonly undertaken ≥10 years after the last seizure.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insights into factors associated with the shared decision-making process regarding ASM discontinuation in seizure-free patients and highlights the importance of considering individual patient characteristics and seizure history.

Discontinuation of Antiseizure Medications in Patients With Brain Tumors

Patients with brain tumors will experience seizures during their disease course. While providers can use antiseizure medications to control these events, patients with brain tumors can experience side effects, ranging from mild to severe, from these medications. Providers in subspecialties such as neurology, neuro-oncology, neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology often work with patients with brain tumor to balance seizure control and the adverse toxicity of antiseizure medications. In this study, we sought to explore the problem of brain tumor-related seizures/epilepsy in the context of how and when to consider antiseizure medication discontinuation. Moreover, we thoroughly evaluate the literature on antiseizure medication discontinuation for adult and pediatric patients and highlight recommendations relevant to patients with both brain tumors and seizures.

Variation in seizure risk increases from antiseizure medication withdrawal among patients with well-controlled epilepsy: A pooled analysis

OBJECTIVE

Guidelines suggest considering antiseizure medication (ASM) discontinuation in seizure-free patients with epilepsy. Past work has poorly explored how discontinuation effects vary between patients. We evaluated (1) what factors modify the influence of discontinuation on seizure risk; and (2) the range of seizure risk increase due to discontinuation across low- versus high-risk patients.

METHODS

We pooled three datasets including seizure-free patients who did and did not discontinue ASMs. We conducted time-to-first-seizure analyses. First, we evaluated what individual patient factors modified the relative effect of ASM discontinuation on seizure risk via interaction terms. Then, we assessed the distribution of 2-year risk increase as predicted by our adjusted logistic regressions.

RESULTS

We included 1626 patients, of whom 678 (42%) planned to discontinue all ASMs. The mean predicted 2-year seizure risk was 43% [95% confidence interval (CI) 39%-46%] for discontinuation versus 21% (95% CI 19%-24%) for continuation. The mean 2-year absolute seizure risk increase was 21% (95% CI 18%-26%). No individual interaction term was significant after correcting for multiple comparisons. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] risk increase across patients was 19% (IQR 14%-24%; range 7%-37%). Results were unchanged when restricting analyses to only the two RCTs.

SIGNIFICANCE

No single patient factor significantly modified the influence of discontinuation on seizure risk, although we captured how absolute risk increases change for patients that are at low versus high risk. Patients should likely continue ASMs if even a 7% 2-year increase in the chance of any more seizures would be too much and should likely discontinue ASMs if even a 37% risk increase would be too little. In between these extremes, individualized risk calculation and a careful understanding of patient preferences are critical. Future work will further develop a two-armed individualized seizure risk calculator and contextualize seizure risk thresholds below which to consider discontinuation.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Understanding how much antiseizure medications (ASMs) decrease seizure risk is an important part of determining which patients with epilepsy should be treated, especially for patients who have not had a seizure in a while. We found that there was a wide range in the amount that ASM discontinuation increases seizure risk-between 7% and 37%. We found that no single patient factor modified that amount. Understanding what a patient's seizure risk might be if they discontinued versus continued ASM treatment is critical to making informed decisions about whether the benefit of treatment outweighs the downsides.

Seizure outcome in medically treated patients with adult-onset epilepsy and cerebral cavernous malformation

PURPOSE

We evaluated long-term seizure outcomes of antiseizure medications (ASMs) and risk factors for drug resistance in patients with adult-onset epilepsy associated with cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study included patients newly diagnosed with adult-onset focal epilepsy associated with CCM. Patients received individualized treatments with ASMs. All patients were followed-up for at least 2 years. The main outcome measure was terminal 2 year seizure freedom (2-YSF).

RESULTS

Forty eight subjects (28 men and 20 women) were included. Thirty-one (64.6%) subjects achieved a terminal 2-YSF (range 2.0-17.0 years). After treatment with the first drug regimen, 31 (64.6%) subjects achieved 2-YSF, with 23 remaining seizure-free until final follow-up visit. Of the 23 subjects treated with the second drug regimen and the six treated with the third drug regimen, ten (43.5%) and one (16.7%), respectively, achieved a terminal 2-YSF. Stepwise logistic regression analyses showed that terminal 2-YSF was negatively associated with epileptiform discharge on EEG at the time of diagnosis (odds ratio = 0.214, p = 0.047) and tended to be associated with age ≥ 45 years at seizure onset (odds ratio = 4.260, p = 0.056).

CONCLUSION

The present study found that 64.6% of CCM patients with adult-onset epilepsy achieved terminal 2-YSF after ASM initiation. Interictal epileptiform discharge on EEG at the time of diagnosis was associated with poor prognosis. Failure to achieve sustained seizure freedom after two ASMs may indicate the need for surgical treatment.

Should antiseizure medications be withdrawn after an extended period of seizure freedom in individuals with adult-onset epilepsy?

Unlike several epilepsies with onset in pediatric age, adult-onset epilepsies do not typically have a time course that is predictably self-remitting in the large majority of people. Still, about one-half of individuals with adult-onset epilepsy who have been seizure-free for an extended period (two years or longer) on antiseizure medications (ASMs) will remain in remission when their drug therapy is discontinued. Although a number of predictors of outcome have been identified (including specific adult-onset syndromes associated with a low probability of spontaneous remission), in most cases, the only way to establish whether the epilepsy has remitted in a given individual is to gradually withdraw ASMs. ASM withdrawal can be beneficial, particularly when the currently used treatment is not well tolerated, or could lead to adverse outcomes in the future (i.e., teratogenic effects should pregnancy occur in a female of childbearing potential). However, the risks associated with ASM withdrawal are significant. Relapse of seizures can have major adverse psychosocial consequences and also may carry a risk of morbidity and mortality. Most importantly, evidence suggests that in about 20% of individuals whose seizure relapsed following ASM withdrawal, re-institution of pharmacological therapy may not readily restore seizure control. Ultimately, management decisions should prioritize the preference of the well-informed person with epilepsy. Particularly, when adverse drug effects are a concern, options to be discussed should include not only withdrawal or continuation of the current treatment but also dose reduction or substitution with a different ASM.

Evaluation of Event-Related Potentials in Assessing Cognitive Functions of Adult Patients with Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology

Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) is an important consequence of epilepsy. The aim of the study was to assess cognitive performance in patients with epilepsy, using neuropsychological tests (NT) and event-related potentials (ERPs), with regard to demographic and clinical data. Methods: The study comprised 50 patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology and 46 healthy controls. Based on the NT results, the patients were divided into subgroups with/without CI. Parameters of P300 potential were compared between the patients and controls. P300 parameters and NT results were referred to demographics and clinical characteristics of epilepsy. Results: Based on the NT, 66% of patients were assigned as cognitively impaired. Median P300 latency was significantly (p < 0.0002) prolonged in the study group. Subgroups of patients with and without CI significantly (p < 0.034) differed in education level and vocational activity, duration of epilepsy, age at its onset and frequency of polytherapy. P300 parameters showed significant (p < 0.03) relationships with duration of epilepsy, type and frequency of seizures and polytherapy. Conclusions: Cognitive impairment and ERPs abnormalities occur in a majority of patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology. Characteristics of epilepsy and socioeconomic status are related to cognitive performance. ERPs may complement neuropsychological methods in the assessment of cognition in patients with epilepsy.

Withdrawal of antiseizure medications - for whom, when, and how?

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy is a chronic disorder of the brain characterized by an enduring predisposition to generate epileptic seizures. Most patients can achieve complete seizure control (seizure freedom) with antiseizure medications (ASMs). In some of them, the withdrawal of ASMs can be considered. Guidance is required to identify patients in whom drug discontinuation can be safely attempted and to inform when and how ASM withdrawal can be done.

AREAS COVERED

In this perspective, the authors discuss the evidence on ASM withdrawal in epilepsy patients who are seizure-free and provide some suggestions on how to do it effectively in clinical practice, minimizing the risk of seizure recurrence.

EXPERT OPINION

The decision of discontinuing ASMs in epilepsy patients should rely on an accurate estimate of seizure recurrence risk. Whenever possible, such a risk should be assessed on an individual basis. The decision should also consider the psychosocial and personal consequences of seizure relapse. No robust evidence is available on the safest tapering regimen.

The sense of stopping migraine prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Migraine prophylactic therapy has changed over recent years with the development and approval of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway. As new therapies emerged, leading headache societies have been providing guidelines on the initiation and escalation of such therapies. However, there is a lack of robust evidence looking at the duration of successful prophylaxis and the effects of therapy discontinuation. In this narrative review we explore both the biological and clinical rationale for prophylactic therapy discontinuation to provide a basis for clinical decision-making.

METHODS

Three different literature search strategies were conducted for this narrative review. These include i) stopping rules in comorbidities of migraine in which overlapping preventives are prescribed, notably depression and epilepsy; ii) stopping rules of oral treatment and botox; iii) stopping rules of antibodies targeting the CGRP (receptor). Keywords were utilized in the following databases: Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core collection, Cochran Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar.

DISCUSSION

Reasons to guide decision-making in stopping prophylactic migraine therapies include adverse events, efficacy failure, drug holiday following long-term administration, and patient-specific reasons. Certain guidelines contain both positive and negative stopping rules. Following withdrawal of migraine prophylaxis, migraine burden may return to pre-treatment level, remain unchanged, or lie somewhere in-between. The current suggestion to discontinue CGRP(-receptor) targeted mAbs after 6 to 12 months is based on expert opinion, as opposed to robust scientific evidence. Current guidelines advise the clinician to assess the success of CGRP(-receptor) targeted mAbs after three months. Based on excellent tolerability data and the absence of scientific data, we propose if no other reasons apply, to stop the use of mAbs when the number of migraine days decreases to four or fewer migraine days per month. There is a higher likelihood of developing side effects with oral migraine preventatives, and so we suggest stopping these drugs according to the national guidelines if they are well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Translational and basic studies are warranted to investigate the long-term effects of a preventive drug after its discontinuation, starting from what is known about the biology of migraine. In addition, observational studies and, eventually, clinical trials focusing on the effect of discontinuation of migraine prophylactic therapies, are essential to substantiate evidence-based recommendations on stopping rules for both oral preventives and CGRP(-receptor) targeted therapies in migraine.

Frequency of and factors associated with antiseizure medication discontinuation discussions and decisions in patients with epilepsy: A multicenter retrospective chart review

OBJECTIVE

Guidelines suggest considering antiseizure medication (ASM) discontinuation in patients with epilepsy who become seizure-free. Little is known about how discontinuation decisions are being made in practice. We measured the frequency of, and factors associated with, discussions and decisions surrounding ASM discontinuation.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study at the University of Michigan (UM) and two Dutch centers: Wilhelmina Children's Hospital (WCH) and Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN). We screened all children and adults with outpatient epilepsy visits in January 2015 and included those with at least one visit during the subsequent 2 years where they were seizure-free for at least one year. We recorded whether charts documented (1) a discussion with the patient about possible ASM discontinuation and (2) any planned attempt to discontinue at least one ASM. We conducted multilevel logistic regressions to determine factors associated with each outcome.

RESULTS

We included 1058 visits from 463 patients. Of all patients who were seizure-free at least one year, 248/463 (53%) had documentation of any discussion and 98/463 (21%) planned to discontinue at least one ASM. Corresponding frequencies for patients who were seizure-free at least 2 years were 184/285 (65%) and 74/285 (26%). The probability of discussing or discontinuing increased with longer duration of seizure freedom. Still, even for patients who were 10 years seizure-free, our models predicated that in only 49% of visits was a discontinuation discussion documented, and in only 16% of visits was it decided to discontinue all ASMs. Provider-to-provider variation explained 18% of variation in whether patients discontinued any ASM.

SIGNIFICANCE

Only approximately half of patients with prolonged seizure freedom had a documented discussion about ASM discontinuation. Discontinuation was fairly rare even among low-risk patients. Future work should further explore barriers to and facilitators of counseling and discontinuation attempts.

Rapid versus slow withdrawal of antiepileptic monotherapy in two-year seizure-free adults patients with epilepsy (RASLOW) study: A pragmatic multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled study

PURPOSE

To establish whether a slow or a rapid withdrawal of antiepileptic monotherapy influences relapse rate in seizure-free adults with epilepsy and calculates compliance and differences in the severity of relapses, based on the occurrence of status epilepticus, seizure-related injuries, and death.

METHODS

This is a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open label, non-inferiority trial in people aged 16 + years who were seizure-free for more than 2 years. Patients were randomized to slow withdrawal (160 days) or rapid withdrawal (60 days) and were followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was the probability of a first seizure relapse within the 12-months follow-up. The secondary outcomes included the cumulative probability of relapse at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. A non-inferiority analysis was performed with non-inferiority margin of - 0.15 for the difference between the probabilities of seizure recurrence in slow versus rapid withdrawal.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 48 patients, 25 randomized to slow withdrawal and 23 to rapid withdrawal. Median follow-up was 11.9 months. In the intention-to-treat population, 3 patients in the slow-withdrawal group and 1 in the rapid withdrawal group experienced seizure relapses. The corresponding probabilities of seizure recurrence were 0.12 for slow withdrawal and 0.04 for rapid withdrawal, giving a difference of 0.08 (95% CI - 0.12; 0.27), which is entirely above the non-inferiority margin. No patients developed status epilepticus and seizure-related injuries or died. Risks were similar in the Per-Protocol population.

CONCLUSIONS

Seizure-relapse rate after drug discontinuation is lower than in other reports, without complications and unrelated to the duration of tapering.

Risk factors and consequences of self-discontinuation of treatment by patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Patients with epilepsy not uncommonly self-discontinue treatment with antiseizure medications (ASM). The rate, reasons for this, and consequences have not been well studied.

METHODS

We analyzed self-discontinuation of ASM treatment in patients with recently diagnosed epilepsy via review of clinic letters and hospital correspondence in a prospective cohort of first seizure patients.

RESULTS

We studied 489 patients with newly diagnosed and treated epilepsy (median age 41, range 14-88, 62% male), followed up for a median duration of 3.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.2-6.0). Seventy eight (16.0%) self-discontinued ASM therapy after a median treatment duration of 1.4 years (IQR: 0.4-2.9), and after a median duration of seizure freedom of 11.8 months (IQR: 4.6-31.8). Patients commonly self-discontinued treatment due to adverse effects (41%), perception that treatment was no longer required (35%), and planned or current pregnancy (12%). Patients who self-discontinued were less likely to have epileptogenic lesions on neuroimaging (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.83), presentation with seizure clusters (HR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.14-0.69) and presentation with tonic-clonic seizures (HR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.19-0.70). Patients with shorter interval since the last seizure (HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66-0.86) were more likely to self-discontinue treatment. Sleep deprivation prior to seizures before diagnosis (HR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.05-3.09) and significant alcohol or illicit drug use (HR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.20-4.59) were also associated with higher rates of discontinuation. After discontinuation, 51 patients (65%) experienced seizure recurrence, and 43 (84%) restarted treatment. Twenty two patients (28%) experienced a seizure-related injury after treatment discontinuation.

SIGNIFICANCE

Self-initiated discontinuation of ASM treatment was not uncommon in patients with newly treated epilepsy. Reasons for discontinuation highlight areas for improved discussion with patients, including the chronicity of epilepsy and management strategies for current or potential adverse effects.

Reappraisal of the Medical Research Council Antiepileptic Drug Withdrawal Study: contamination‐adjusted and dose‐response re‐analysis

Objective

The 1991 Medical Research Council (MRC) Study compared seizure relapse for seizure‐free patients randomized to withdraw vs continue of antiseizure medications (ASMs). We re‐analyzed this trial to account for crossover between arms using contamination‐adjusted intention to treat (CA ITT) methods, to explore dose‐response curves, and to validate predictions against external data. ITT assesses the effect of being randomized to withdraw, as‐treated analysis assesses the confounded effect of withdrawing, but CA ITT assesses the unconfounded effect of actually withdrawing.

Methods

CA ITT involves two stages. First, we used randomized arm to predict whether patients withdrew their ASM (logistic) or total daily ASM dose (linear). Second, we used those values to predict seizure occurrence (logistic).

Results

The trial randomized 503 patients to withdraw and 501 patients to continue ASMs. We found that 316 of 376 patients (88%) who were randomized to withdraw decreased their dose at every pre‐seizure visit, compared with 35 of 424 (8%) who were randomized to continue (p < .01). Adjusted odds ratios of a 2‐year seizure for those who withdrew vs those who did not was 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9–1.9) in the as‐treated analysis, 2.5 (95% CI 1.9–3.4) comparing those randomized to withdraw vs continue for ITT, and 3.1 (95% CI 2.1–4.5) for CA ITT. Probabilities (withdrawal vs continue) were 28% vs 24% (as‐treated), 40% vs 22% (ITT), and 43% vs 21% (CA ITT). Differences between ITT and CA ITT were greater when varying the predictor (reaching zero ASMs) or outcome (1‐year seizures). As‐treated dose‐response curves demonstrated little to no effects, but larger effects in CA ITT analysis. MRC data overpredicted risk in Lossius data, with moderate discrimination (areas under the curve ~0.70).

Significance

CA ITT results (the effect of actually withdrawing ASMs on seizures) were slightly greater than ITT effects (the effect of recommend withdrawing ASMs on seizures). How these findings affect clinical practice must be individualized.

Prediction of seizure recurrence using electroencephalogram analysis with multiscale deep neural networks before withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs

BACKGROUND

The decision to continue or discontinue antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment in patients who are seizure free for a prolonged time is critical. Studies have used certain risk factors or electroencephalogram (EEG) findings to predict seizure recurrence after the withdrawal of AEDs. However, applicable biomarkers to guide the withdrawal of AEDs are lacking.

METHODS

In this study, we used EEG analysis based on multiscale deep neural networks (MSDNN) to establish a method for predicting seizure recurrence after the withdrawal of AEDs. A total of 60 patients with epilepsy were divided into two groups (30 in the recurrence group and 30 in the non-recurrence group). All patients were seizure free for at least 2 years. Before AED withdrawal, an EEG was performed for each patient, which showed no epileptiform discharges. These EEG recordings were classified using MSDNN.

RESULTS

We found that the performance indices of classification between recurrence and non-recurrence groups had a mean sensitivity, mean specificity, mean accuracy, and mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 74.23%, 75.83%, 74.66%, and 82.66%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our proposed method is a promising tool to help physicians to predict seizure recurrence after AED withdrawal among seizure-free patients.

Prognostic implications of persistent interictal epileptiform discharges on antiseizure medication withdrawal in patients with epilepsy in five-year remission

PURPOSE

Whether patients with epilepsy in long-term remission and interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) can stop antiseizure medication (ASM) remains a challenging topic even though multiple studies have investigated ASM withdrawal. This study aimed to estimate seizure relapse and its risk factors in patients with epilepsy in five-year remission and persistent IEDs.

METHODS

Patients with epilepsy and persistent IEDs were prospectively recruited from the Affiliated Nanjing Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from Dec.1, 2010 to Dec.30, 2019. All enrolled patients achieved seizure remission for over five years and were divided into the ASM withdrawal and continuous treatment groups according to their personal preference. Seizure outcomes and 24 h video electroencephalogram findings were obtained through clinical visits or telephone interviews every three months until March 31, 2021. The cumulative recurrence rate and its diversity between the ASM withdrawal and continuous treatment groups were tested using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to explore the independent predictors for seizure recurrence. Relapsed patients were further monitored for their seizure control and prognosis.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients with epilepsy in five-year remission and persistent IEDs were enrolled in this study, including 41 (49.4%) in the ASM withdrawal group and 42 (50.6%) in the continuous ASM treatment group. During the follow-up with a median time of 36.8 months (range from 18.7 to 104.6 months), the seizure relapse in off-medication patients (43.9%, 18/41) was higher than that in on-medication patients (21.4%, 9/42; P = 0.031). In the multivariate analysis model, independent predictors for seizure recurrence were structural-metabolic epilepsy or unknown cause (HR = 6.185, 95% CI 1.166-32.805) and multiple seizure types (HR = 2.807, 95% CI 1.051-7.502). ASM withdrawal was not found to be an independent risk factor for seizure recurrence. Of 27 patients with seizure recurrence, 25 were given reinstitution or continuous ASM therapy, whereas two chose sustained observation without medication. At the end of the follow-up, 70.4% (19/27) of recurrence patients were completely free from seizures for at least one year again, and only one patient developed refractory epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

For patients with epilepsy in five-year remission and persistent IEDs, drug withdrawal may be a rational choice after the individualized assessment of benefits and risks. Furthermore, the independent risk factors for the seizure relapse were structural-metabolic epilepsy or an unknown cause, and multiple seizure types. Finally, patients with epilepsy relapsing after ASM withdrawal could achieve seizure remission again after ASM retreatment.

Antiseizure Medication Withdrawal in Seizure-Free Patients: Practice Advisory Update Summary: Report of the AAN Guideline Subcommittee

OBJECTIVE

To update a 1996 American Academy of Neurology practice parameter.

METHODS

The authors systematically reviewed literature published from January 1991 to March 2020.

RESULTS

The long-term (24-60 months) risk of seizure recurrence is possibly higher among adults who have been seizure-free for 2 years and taper antiseizure medications (ASMs) vs those who do not taper ASMs (15% vs 7% per the 1 Class I article addressing this issue). In pediatric patients, there is probably no significant difference in seizure recurrence between those who begin tapering ASMs after 2 years vs 4 years of seizure freedom, and there is insufficient evidence of significant difference in risk of seizure recurrence between those who taper ASMs after 18 months of seizure freedom and those tapering after 24 months. There is insufficient evidence that the rate of seizure recurrence with ASM withdrawal following epilepsy surgery after 1 year of seizure freedom vs after 4 years is not significantly different than maintaining patients on ASMs. An epileptiform EEG in pediatric patients increases the risk of seizure recurrence. ASM withdrawal possibly does not increase the risk of status epilepticus in adults. In seizure-free adults, ASM weaning possibly does not change quality of life. Withdrawal of ASMs at 25% every 10 days to 2 weeks is probably not significantly different from withdrawal at 25% every 2 months in children who are seizure-free in more than 4 years of follow-up.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Fourteen recommendations were developed.

Epilepsy surgery for low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumor of temporal lobe: a single-institution experience of 61 patients

Background

Low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumor (LEAT) is highly responsive to surgery in general. The appropriate surgical strategy remains controversial in temporal LEAT. The aim of this study is to analyze the surgical seizure outcome of temporal LEAT, focusing on the aspects of surgical strategy.

Methods

Sixty-one patients from a single epilepsy center with temporal LEAT underwent surgery. The surgical strategy was according to the multidisciplinary presurgical evaluation. Electrocorticogram (ECoG)-assisted resection was utilized. Surgical extent including lesionectomy and extended resection was described in detail. Seizure outcome was classified as satisfactory (Engel class I) and unsatisfactory (Engel classes II–IV).

Results

After a median follow-up of 36.0 (30.0) months, 83.6% of patients achieved satisfactory outcome, including 72.1% with Engel class Ia. There was 39.3% (24/61) of patients with antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal. Use of ECoG (χ2 = 0.000, P > 0.1), preresection spike (χ2 = 0.000, P = 0.763), or spike residue (P = 0.545) was not correlated with the seizure outcome. For lateral temporal LEAT, outcome from lesionectomy was comparable to extended resection (χ2 = 0.499, P > 0.1). For mesial temporal LEAT, 94.7% (18/19) of patients who underwent additional hippocampectomy were satisfactory, whereas only 25% (1/4) of patients who underwent lesionectomy were satisfactory (P = 0.009).

Conclusion

Surgical treatment was highly effective for temporal LEAT. ECoG may not influence the seizure outcome. For lateral temporal LEAT, lesionectomy with or without cortectomy was sufficient in most patients. For mesial temporal LEAT, extended resection was recommended.

Seizure recurrence after prolonged seizure control: Patterns and risk factors

OBJECTIVE

To identify the patterns and possible predictors of seizure recurrence after durable seizure freedom during maintenance of anti-seizure medication (ASM) treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study that identified all adult individuals with epilepsy (IWE) at the George Washington University outpatient epilepsy clinic between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2016 who had been seizure free for at least 2 years. We followed up the patients until 5/30/2020 for seizure recurrence. The data were analyzed using survival analysis, univariate analysis, and multivariate regression with Cox proportional hazard model. Outcomes were dichotomized into seizure relapse and seizure freedom. The total number of relapses and triggers of the initial relapse for individual patient were also analyzed.

RESULTS

This single-center cohort consisted of 220 IWE (age 21-80) of whom 99 patients had been seizure free for 2-3 years and 121 patients had been seizure free for more than 3 years. In this cohort, 48 patients (22%) experienced at least one seizure relapse during the span of the study. Of the relapsing patients, 25 (52%) had a single seizure relapse, and 8 (15%) had frequent seizure relapses (n ≥ 5) and developed pharmacoresistance. Half of the initial seizure relapses occurred without a trigger. Among those with at least one year of follow-up after relapsing (n = 33), 29 (86%) regained seizure freedom for at least 1 year. Among 26 patients with at least 2 years of follow-up, only 14 (55%) regained at least 2 years of seizure freedom. Previous longer duration of seizure freedom and ASM monotherapy predicted less chances of seizure relapse and fewer seizure numbers after relapse. No difference in prognosis was noted among relapsing patients between those with or without triggers.

SIGNIFICANCE

Patients with well-controlled epilepsy may have seizure relapses with or without identifiable triggers. Most patients regained at least 1-year seizure freedom after the initial relapse, whereas about half patients reachieved 2-year seizure remission. About 15% of the relapsing patients may subsequently develop pharmacoresistance. Prognostic factors of seizure recurrences include duration of initial seizure remission and the number of ASMs used during remission. The presence of identifiable triggers for the initial seizure relapse does not predict future outcome.

Prediction of seizure recurrence risk following discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs

OBJECTIVE

Discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in seizure-free patients is an important goal because of possible long-term side effects and the social stigma burden of epilepsy. The purpose of this work was to assess seizure recurrence risk after suspension of AEDs, to evaluate predictors for recurrence, and to investigate the recovery of seizure control after relapse. In addition, the accuracy of a previously published prediction model of seizure recurrence risk was estimated.

METHODS

Seizure-free patients with epilepsy who had discontinued AEDs were retrospectively enrolled. The frequency of seizure relapses after AED withdrawal as well as prognosis after recurrence were assessed and the predictive role of baseline clinical-demographic variables was evaluated. The aforementioned prediction model was also validated and its accuracy assessed at different seizure-relapse probability levels.

RESULTS

The enrolled patients (n = 133) had been followed for a median of 3 years (range 0.8-33 years) after AED discontinuation; 60 (45%) of them relapsed. Previous febrile seizures in childhood (hazard ratio [HR] 3.927; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.403-10.988), a seizure-free period on therapy of less than 2 years (HR 2.313; 95% CI 1.193-4.486), and persistent motor deficits (HR 4.568; 95% CI 1.412-14.772) were the clinical features associated with relapse risk in univariate analysis. Among these variables, only a seizure-free period on therapy of less than 2 years was associated with seizure recurrence in multivariate analysis (HR 2.365; 95% CI 1.178-4.7444). Pharmacological control of epilepsy was restored in 82.4% of the patients who relapsed. In this population, the aforementioned prediction model showed an unsatisfactory accuracy.

SIGNIFICANCE

A period of freedom from seizure on therapy of less than 2 years was the main predictor of seizure recurrence. The accuracy of the previously described prediction tool was low in this cohort, thus suggesting its cautious use in real-world clinical practice.

Long-term seizure and psychosocial outcome in childhood epilepsy of unknown cause

OBJECTIVE

The purpose was to investigate long-term prognosis of epilepsy of unknown cause with onset between ages 2 and 16 in children without any major disability, by evaluation of a previously described prognostic model and long-term follow-up of a study on the impact of duration of initial antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment.

METHODS

Patients included in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of either one or three years of ASM therapy prior to withdrawal (if seizure-free for at least 6 months) were contacted after 29-35 years and asked to complete a survey. Potential prognostic factors were evaluated: duration of initial ASM treatment, seizure type, seizure frequency, and score in a prognostic model developed in the initial publication.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-nine subjects answered the questionnaire (response rate 65%). Seizure freedom without treatment was found in 110 responders (77%, 95%CI: 73-81). There was no significant difference in score in the prognostic model between responders with and without epilepsy at follow-up. Those with active epilepsy were unemployed significantly more often and perceived their mental health significantly more affected than those seizure-free without treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Duration of initial ASM treatment was not associated with any difference in subsequent epilepsy risk. This indicates that the timing of withdrawal attempts is unlikely to alter the long-term prognosis of uncomplicated childhood epilepsy. The failure of the prognostic model from the initial study to predict long-term outcome argues that although prediction of relapse risk in the shorter term may be possible, the bearing of such models on long-term epilepsy risk is more questionable.

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Monotherapy and Polytherapy in Seizure-Free Patients With Epilepsy Following Antiseizure Medication Withdrawal

Objective: The objectives of this study were to compare the risk and timing of seizure relapse in seizure-free patients with epilepsy following the withdrawal of monotherapy or polytherapy and to identify relevant influencing factors.

Methods: Patients who had achieved at least a 2-year seizure remission and started the withdrawal of antiseizure medication (ASM) were enrolled in this study. All patients were followed for at least 3 years or until seizure relapse. According to the number of ASMs at the time of withdrawalwas about twice than that, patients were divided into two groups: monotherapy group and polytherapy group. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the recurrence risk of the two groups. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis were used to analyze potential confounding variables between patients treated with monotherapy and polytherapy.

Results: A total of 188 patients (119 males and 69 females) were included. The average prescribed daily dose of most ASMs at the time of withdrawal was moderate or low (30–50% defined daily dose). The recurrence of most patients (89.2%) occurred within the first 3 years after withdrawal. The recurrence risk in patients treated with polytherapy at the time of withdrawal was about twice than that of the monotherapy group [p = 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.152, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.350–3.428]. Multivariate analysis showed that patients treated with polytherapy were significantly older at seizure onset [p = 0.024, odd ratio (OR) = 1.027, 95% CI = 1.004–1.052] and had a significantly longer duration of epilepsy before treatment (p = 0.004, OR = 1.009, 95% CI = 1.003–1.015) compared to patients in the monotherapy group. In addition, a history of perinatal injury was found to be an independent risk factor of seizure relapse in patients with ASM withdrawal.

Conclusion: The average prescribed daily dose of most ASMs at the time of withdrawal was moderate or low. Patients who received polytherapy at the time of withdrawal, particularly those with later seizure onset age and longer epilepsy duration before treatment, had a higher recurrence risk after ASMs withdrawal compared to patients treated with monotherapy.

Limited care offered to people with epilepsy in Mwanza, Tanzania: need for intervention

Introduction

epilepsy is a very common neurological disorder which is associated with high socioeconomic burden. While up to 90% of people with epilepsy (PWE) in developing countries do not get appropriate treatment, there is limited information about care offered to PWE in Tanzania. This study aimed to describe available care offered to PWE in Mwanza.

Methods

a cross-sectional study involving health care workers (HCWs) and PWE attending five selected hospitals outpatient clinics of Mwanza region was done. HCWs completed self-administered questionnaires while PWE or caretakers were interviewed using structured questionnaires. Coded data were analyzed using SPSS.

Results

a total of 18 HCWs and 218 PWE (or their care takers) participated in this study. Health care workers rarely used investigations to confirm epilepsy diagnosis or explore its causes. 10/18 (55.6%) of HCWs reported that counseling was given to patients but counseling information was largely inadequate regarding the use of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). The AEDs prescriptions were dictated by drug availability and affordability to patients. Among 197 PWE, whose AEDs doses were revealed, 136 (69.0%) were under-medicated. No follow-up investigation was done to all PWE who were interviewed. There was discrepancy between hospitals and practitioners regarding withdrawal of AEDs.

Conclusion

people with epilepsy in Mwanza received limited care. Patients were not thoroughly investigated, counseled and followed-up, and had limited choice and accessibility to AEDs. Some patients particularly in district hospitals were under-medicated despite of seizure recurrence. We recommend short-course training about epilepsy management to the HCWs who diagnose and treat PWE regularly.

Seizures and Epilepsy After Stroke: Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Management

Stroke is the leading cause of seizures and epilepsy in older adults. Patients who have larger and more severe strokes involving the cortex, are younger, and have acute symptomatic seizures and intracerebral haemorrhage are at highest risk of developing post-stroke epilepsy. Prognostic models, including the SeLECT and CAVE scores, help gauge the risk of epileptogenesis. Early electroencephalogram and blood-based biomarkers can provide information additional to the clinical risk factors of post-stroke epilepsy. The management of acute versus remote symptomatic seizures after stroke is markedly different. The choice of an ideal antiseizure medication should not only rely on efficacy but also consider adverse effects, altered pharmacodynamics in older adults, and the influence on the underlying vascular co-morbidity. Drug-drug interactions, particularly those between antiseizure medications and anticoagulants or antiplatelets, also influence treatment decisions. In this review, we describe the epidemiology, risk factors, biomarkers, and management of seizures after an ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke. We discuss the special considerations required for the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy due to the age, co-morbidities, co-medication, and vulnerability of stroke survivors.

Seizures and epilepsy after intracerebral hemorrhage: an update

Seizures are common after intracerebral hemorrhage, occurring in 6-15% of the patients, mostly in the first 72 h. Their incidence reaches 30% when subclinical or non-convulsive seizures are diagnosed by continuous electroencephalogram. Several risk factors for seizures have been described including cortical location of intracerebral hemorrhage, presence of intraventricular hemorrhage, total hemorrhage volume, and history of alcohol abuse. Seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage may theoretically be harmful as they can lead to sudden blood pressure fluctuations, increased intracranial pressure, and neuronal injury due to increased metabolic demand. Some recent studies suggest that acute symptomatic seizures (occurring within 7 days of stroke) are associated with worse functional outcome and increased risk of death despite accounting for other known prognostic factors such as age and baseline hemorrhage volume. However, the impact of seizures on prognosis is still debated and it remains unclear if treating or preventing seizures might lead to improved clinical outcome. Thus, the currently available scientific evidence does not support the routine use of antiseizure medication as primary prevention among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Only prospective adequately powered randomized-controlled trials will be able to answer whether seizure prophylaxis in the acute or longer term settings is beneficial or not in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

The management of epilepsy in clinical practice: Do the timing and severity of the disease influence the priorities of patients and the caring physicians? Data from the EPINEEDS study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the priorities of patients with epilepsy and their caring physicians with reference to the timing and severity of the disease.

METHODS

This is a national survey in which patients with epilepsy followed in 21 Italian epilepsy centers, and their caring physicians were asked to fill anonymous questionnaires to collect data on different aspects of the disease and their needs and priorities in its management. The collected information included demographics, clinical profile and diagnosis, treatment and outcome of epilepsy. The questions were designed to understand the expectations of the patients and their caring physicians and verify the degree of concordance between patient and doctor. The study population was divided in six prognostic categories: (1) Newly diagnosed epilepsy; (2) Absence of seizures for at least 2 years; (3) Absence of seizures for at least 1 year or occasional seizures; (4) Nondrug-resistant recurrent seizures; (5) drug-resistant seizures; (6) surgical candidate.

RESULTS

Of the 787 patients enrolled, 432 were women and 355 men aged 15 to 88 years (median 41 years). Disease duration ranged from 6 months to 75 years. The sample included 53 patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy, 283 without seizures for at least 2 years, 162 seizure-free for at least 1 year or with occasional seizures, 123 with nondrug-resistant recurrent seizures, 128 with drug-resistant seizures, and 38 surgical candidates. Significant differences were found between patients and physicians in terms of priorities and needs with reference to the management of the disease. While physicians tend to prioritize the information on the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy depending on timing and severity, patients focus on the search of the cause, the side effects of drugs, and the effects of any new treatment on the control of seizures regardless of the prognostic category. In addition, physicians tend to undervalue the communication of specific information, like the risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) or the existence of lay associations, which might be of special interest for selected categories of patients.

SIGNIFICANCE

Differences between patients with epilepsy and their caring physicians in terms of needs and priorities and suboptimal communication call for the implementation of programs aimed at addressing the factors deemed most relevant by patients and caregivers for the management of the disease.

Determination of Antiepileptic Drugs Withdrawal Through EEG Hjorth Parameter Analysis

The decision to continue or to stop antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment in patients with prolonged seizure remission is a critical issue. Previous studies have used certain risk factors or electroencephalogram (EEG) findings to predict seizure recurrence after the withdrawal of AEDs. However, validated biomarkers to guide the withdrawal of AEDs are lacking. In this study, we used quantitative EEG analysis to establish a method for predicting seizure recurrence after the withdrawal of AEDs. A total of 34 patients with epilepsy were divided into two groups, 17 patients in the recurrence group and the other 17 patients in the nonrecurrence group. All patients were seizure free for at least two years. Before AED withdrawal, an EEG was performed for each patient that showed no epileptiform discharges. These EEG recordings were classified using Hjorth parameter-based EEG features. We found that the Hjorth complexity values were higher in patients in the recurrence group than in the nonrecurrence group. The extreme gradient boosting classification method achieved the highest performance in terms of accuracy, area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity (84.76%, 88.77%, 89.67%, and 80.47%, respectively). Our proposed method is a promising tool to help physicians determine AED withdrawal for seizure-free patients.

How often do doctors discuss drug withdrawal with their seizure-free patients with epilepsy?

Among patients with epilepsy, almost 70% become seizure-free with the current antiseizure drugs (ASDs) within 20 years following seizure onset. Of those who have been seizure-free for many years, around 70% remain seizure-free after withdrawal of ASDs. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which seizure-free patients with epilepsy in Norway discuss drug discontinuation with their physician. An online questionnaire was used; among the respondents were 186 adult patients who had been seizure-free for at least five years and were still using ASDs. Of these, 60 patients (32%) reported that they had discussed the question of drug withdrawal with their treating physician. Those patients who reported being involved in treatment decisions were more likely to have discussed ASD withdrawal. In conclusion, it is our opinion that discontinuation of drug treatment in patients with long-term seizure freedom is discussed far too seldom and that many patients may be living with an unnecessary drug burden.

Withdrawal seizures: possible risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Most of the patients usually achieve seizure freedom under treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs). Drug withdrawal in seizure-free patients is still one of the most challenging issues in the management of epilepsy. The decision-making process of whether the treatment should be discontinued must be based on the evaluation of possible long-term side effects of chronic treatment and, on the other hand, the risk of seizure relapse.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to describe and discuss possible predictors and risk factors for seizure relapse during and after discontinuation, according to the available literature evidence. The most important risk factors for withdrawal failure are the etiology of the epilepsy syndrome and epilepsy-related factors, worsening or persistence of epileptiform abnormalities on EEG recordings at the time of discontinuation or during drug tapering, and brain MRI abnormalities. Each single risk factor should be considered together with possible other concurrent predictors.

EXPERT OPINION

The decision to withdrawal antiseizure medication in seizure-free patients should be carefully planned and based on the evaluation of predictors. A discontinuation program should include tailored discussion with patients and family members and individualized decision, the taper schedule, and plans for monitoring during and after drug tapering.

Patients' attitude toward AED withdrawal: A survey among individuals who had been seizure-free for over 2 years

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate the attitudes of seizure-free patients toward the antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal and to highlight the factors that affect their perspectives.

METHODS

The study participants were recruited among the individuals attending the epilepsy outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Skopje between January 2018 and April 2019. Patients with epilepsy who had been seizure-free for at least 2 years on stable monotherapy were included.

RESULTS

Among the 90 participants, 43 were female, and the mean age was 36.3 years. The mean duration of active epilepsy before remission was 7.9 years, and the length of the seizure-free period at the time of evaluation was 2-20 years. Forty-four percent of participants aimed to taper their antiseizure medications because of concerns about the potential long-term side effects and teratogenicity, the burden of taking medication daily, stigma, as well as the impression of no longer having a chronic disease after withdrawal. The majority of them preferred slow versus rapid withdrawal. On the other side, 55% of patients choose to continue AED treatment, mainly feeling well-adjusted to it and being concern about possible seizure recurrence after withdrawal and subsequent loss of driving license or even their jobs. Previous unsuccessful attempts to discontinue AED together with previously uncontrolled seizures were additional motives against withdrawal. The patients' views toward stopping or withholding AED were significantly associated with their gender and marital status (male patients as well as single ones favored medication withdrawal). Patients' age to some extent, though not significantly, affected their viewpoints (younger participants tended to question the further necessity of AEDs and were more concerned about the potential adverse consequences). No other demographic or epilepsy-related data considerably predisposed the decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of the patients with epilepsy preferred to continue their AED after 2 years of seizure freedom. Male gender, being single, and somewhat younger age were associated preferences to withdraw AED.

Risk factors for recurrence after drug withdrawal in childhood epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Several studies have been conducted to determine the risk of recurrence after withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in recent years. There is no consensus concerning the circumstances affecting discontinuation of AEDs. This study was designed to determine the recurrence rate of epilepsy after withdrawal of AEDs and the risk factors related with recurrence.

METHODS

Children with epilepsy onset between 1 month and 16 years of age who were followed up at least 3 years after AED treatment withdrawal were enrolled. Patients were classified into groups according to defined risk factors for recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 284 patients, 137 (48.2%) girls and 147 (51.8%) boys were included, and seizures recurred after withdrawal in 51 patients (18%). Thirty-three (64.7%) patients had recurrence in the first year after withdrawal. The recurrence risk was calculated based on the electro-clinical syndromes classification; the recurrence risk was the highest in the juvenile myoclonic/absence group and lowest in the benign infantile seizure group. No recurrence was observed in the infantile spasm group. Data evaluated by multivariable analysis showed that having the structural-metabolic and unknown epilepsy and <3 years seizure free period before withdrawal of AEDs were the main risk factors for recurrence after AED withdrawal in our study.

CONCLUSION

We suggest a seizure-free period of at least 3 years under AED medication and we must be cautious in patients with structural-metabolic and unknown epilepsy before AED withdrawal.

Comparison of the relapse rates in seizure-free patients in whom antiepileptic therapy was discontinued and those in whom the therapy was continued: A meta-analysis

About 70% of patients with epilepsy can be seizure-free with an appropriate treatment. When the seizures are under control, discontinuation of the antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can help avoid their side effects; however, it may increase the risk of relapse. Some studies have compared the relapse rates between patients in whom AEDs have been continued and those in whom AEDs have been discontinued. However, it is not clear whether AED discontinuation causes a higher seizure recurrence rate. This meta-analysis aimed mainly to determine whether the seizure recurrence rate was different between seizure-free patients in whom AEDs were continued and those in whom AEDs were discontinued. The I² value was used for assessing the heterogeneity; the Mantel-Haenszel test was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Seven cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. The study quality evaluation was performed respectively using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Jadad scale. A total of 1253 patients were included. The relapse rate was higher in patients in whom AEDs were discontinued than in those in whom the AED treatment was continued. Furthermore, we also compared the epilepsy recurrence rates after AED discontinuation between seizure-free patients who were on monotherapy with different AEDs (carbamazepine, phenytoin, sodium valproate, and phenobarbitone/primidone). Four studies and 625 patients were included in this analysis. The epilepsy recurrence rates did not significantly differ between the patients on different AED treatment.

Relative Seizure Relapse Risks Associated with Antiepileptic Drug Withdrawal After Different Seizure-Free Periods in Adults with Focal Epilepsy: A Prospective, Controlled Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND

Approximately two-thirds of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy become seizure-free after antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment. A crucial issue for these patients and their families, especially after a long period of seizure freedom, is when to stop their medications.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the optimal timing of AED withdrawal in adults with focal epilepsy who had been seizure-free for ≥ 2 years.

METHODS

Adults with focal epilepsy who had been seizure-free for ≥ 2 years were recruited. Based on their decision to discontinue (withdrawal) or continue (non-withdrawal) AED treatment, patients were assigned to withdrawal or non-withdrawal subgroups according to the length of remission (2 to < 3 years, 3 to < 4 years, 4 to < 5 years and ≥ 5 years). The relapse risks of the withdrawal and corresponding non-withdrawal subgroups were compared, and the relative relapse risks were assessed in a Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 213 eligible patients began to withdraw from AED treatment; 70 had been seizure-free for 2 to < 3 years, 62 had been seizure-free for 3 to < 4 years, 37 had been seizure-free for 4 to < 5 years and 44 had been seizure-free for ≥ 5 years. The figures for the corresponding non-withdrawal subgroups were 463, 334, 251 and 182, respectively. There was a significantly higher risk of seizure relapse in patients withdrawing from AEDs after 2 to < 5 years of seizure freedom than in the corresponding non-withdrawal controls, and the relative relapse risk was 3.052 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.126-4.381; p < 0.001) for the seizure-free period of 2 to < 3 years, 3.617 (95% CI 2.384-5.488; p < 0.001) for 3 to < 4 years and 2.644 (95% CI 1.456-4.799; p = 0.001) for 4 to < 5 years. However, for patients who were seizure-free for ≥ 5 years, AED withdrawal did not significantly increase the risk of seizure relapse compared with that of patients continuing treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 1.362, 95% CI 0.634-2.926, p = 0.428). Compared with a seizure-free period of 2 to < 3 years, the relative relapse risk after AED withdrawal was significantly reduced only after being seizure-free for ≥ 5 years (HR 0.441, 95% CI 0.233-0.834; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Overall, for adults with focal epilepsy, withdrawal from AEDs significantly increased the risk of seizure relapse after being seizure-free for 2 to < 5 years, but might not increase the risk if the seizure-free period was ≥ 5 years.

Valproic acid withdrawal ameliorates impairments of hippocampal-spatial working memory and neurogenesis

Valproic acid (VPA), an agent that is used to treat epileptic seizures, can cause spatial memory impairment in adults and children. This effect is thought to be due to the ability of VPA to inhibit neurogenesis in the hippocampus, which is required for learning. We have previously used an animal model to show that VPA significantly impairs hippocampal-spatial working memory and inhibits neuronal generation in the sub-granular zone of the dentate gyrus. As there are patient reports of improvements in memory after discontinuing VPA treatment, the present study investigated the recovery of both spatial memory and hippocampal neurogenesis at two time points after withdrawal of VPA. Male Wistar rats were given intraperitoneal injections of 0.9% normal saline or VPA (300 mg/kg) twice a day for 10 d. At 1, 30, or 45 d after the drug treatment, the novel object location (NOL) test was used to examine spatial memory; hippocampal cell division was counted using Ki67 immunohistochemistry, and levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and Notch1 were measured using western immunoblotting. Spatial working memory was impaired 1 and 30 d after the final administration, but was restored to control levels by 45 d. Cell proliferation had increased to control levels at 30 and 45 d. Both markers of neurogenesis (BDNF and Notch1 levels) had returned to control levels at 45 d. These results demonstrate that memory recovery occurs over a period of six weeks after discontinuing VPA treatment and is preceded by a return of hippocampal neurogenesis to control levels.

"Chance Takers Are Accident Makers": Are Patients With Epilepsy Really Taking a Chance When They Drive?

This review compiles scientific data about the real dangers faced by people with epilepsy (PWE) who drive. Those include risks of motor vehicle accidents (MVA) in PWE as compared with controls (individuals without epilepsy) and as compared with persons with other medical conditions that impact fitness to drive. Data regarding Accident rates as related to seizure free intervals (SFI), single vs. multiple seizure events, and/or antiseizure drug (ASD) taper and reintroduction are discussed. Variation in state, national, and international laws and guidance for non-commercial and commercial drivers is highlighted, along with some related reasons for driving restrictions. The review concludes by emphasizing the importance of physicians educating patients about local driving laws and about risks of ASD non-adherence. The need for a broader, multi-stakeholder re-examination of driving regulations for PWE is noted.

Weaning from antiseizure drugs after new onset status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

In patients with status epilepticus (SE) without prior epilepsy, there are limited data on the safety of discontinuing antiseizure drugs (ASDs) after seizure control. We aimed to describe seizure recurrence when weaning from ASDs following new onset SE (NOSE).

METHODS

Retrospective review of adult patients with NOSE admitted to Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2015 was performed. Weaning was defined as a discontinuation of ASDs following discharge. Patient demographics, SE characteristics, timing of ASD withdrawal, and seizure recurrence were collected.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-seven patients with mean age 63 ± 18 years were identified; 96 (54.2%) patients had refractory SE (RSE), and 81 (45.8%) had nonrefractory SE. Mean follow-up was 3.8 ± 3.2 years for those successfully weaned off ASDs. One hundred thirty (73.4%) with outpatient follow-up were included in the analysis; 128 (98.5%) patients were discharged on an ASD; 44 of 128 (34.4%) patients underwent weaning from at least 1 ASD following discharge, including 27 of 128 (21.1%) who were completely weaned off of all ASDs. Younger patients (P = 0.009) and those with RSE (P = 0.048, odds ratio = 2.12, 95% confidence interval = 1.00-4.48) tended to undergo weaning. Six of 44 (13.6%) patients had seizure recurrence when weaned off of any ASD, and two of 27 (7.4%) patients completely weaned off all ASDs had seizure recurrence. Two of seven (28.6%) patients who underwent attempted barbiturate weaning experienced seizure recurrence.

SIGNIFICANCE

We found a rate of 13.6% for late seizure recurrence after weaning from at least one ASD in patients with NOSE; seizure recurrence was more likely in patients with RSE treated with barbiturates. Systematic collection of longitudinal data in patients requiring multiple ASDs for NOSE control will provide more conclusive guidance on weaning from ASDs.

Determining when to stop antiepileptic drug treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the number of patients diagnosed with epilepsy continues to rise and the pharmacological and device-based treatment options for epilepsy increase, determining when to stop antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment continues to be an important issue for patient management and counseling.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review focuses on outcomes following AED withdrawal in seizure-free adults with epilepsy. Practical considerations are also discussed because, despite the importance of this topic, relatively little progress has been made in the past year regarding the identification of patients whose risk for recurrent seizures after AED withdrawal is no higher than that of the general population.

SUMMARY

Although articles in the past year have updated the debates about whether and when to discontinue AEDs in seizure-free adults and have suggested potential utility for electroencephalograms as a prognostic tool for AED reduction as well as for an AED withdrawal risk calculator, decisions about AED withdrawal should still be based on the known risks and consequences of seizure recurrence and be made following well documented discussions between doctor and patient/carer.

Withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in patients with low grade and anaplastic glioma after long-term seizure freedom: a prospective observational study

Background

When glioma patients experience long-term seizure freedom the question arises whether antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should be continued. As no prospective studies exist on seizure recurrence in glioma patients after AED withdrawal, we evaluated the decision-making process to withdraw AEDs in glioma patients, and seizure outcome after withdrawal.

Methods

Patients with a histologically confirmed low grade or anaplastic glioma were included. Eligible patients were seizure free ≥ 1 year from the date of last antitumor treatment, or ≥ 2 years since the last seizure when seizures occurred after the end of the last antitumor treatment. Patients and neuro-oncologists made a shared decision on the preferred AED treatment (i.e. AED withdrawal or continuation). Primary outcomes were: (1) outcome of the shared decision-making process and (2) rate of seizure recurrence.

Results

Eighty-three patients fulfilled all eligibility criteria. However, in 12/83 (14%) patients, the neuro-oncologist had serious objections to AED withdrawal. Therefore, 71/83 (86%) patients were analyzed; In 46/71 (65%) patients it was decided to withdraw AED treatment. In the withdrawal group, 26% (12/46) had seizure recurrence during follow-up. Seven of these 12 patients (58%) had tumor progression, of which three within 3 months after seizure recurrence. In the AED continuation group, 8% (2/25) of patients had seizure recurrence of which one had tumor progression.

Conclusion

In 65% of patients a shared decision was made to withdraw AEDs, of which 26% had seizure recurrence. AED withdrawal should only be considered in carefully selected patients with a presumed low risk of tumor progression.

Seizure outcome and epilepsy patterns in patients with cerebral palsy

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate epilepsy patterns and outcomes in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) and identify the variables that determine remission.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. We followed 107 CP patients aged 1-16 years with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The patients were categorized according to their remission outcome, uninterrupted freedom of seizure for 2 years or longer, and 4 epilepsy patterns: A) sustained freedom from seizures before 6 months of treatment; B) delayed but sustained seizure freedom; C) relapsing-remitting course; and D) seizure freedom never attained. The variables were analysed for their prognostic relevance to the outcomes RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included; their mean age at epilepsy diagnosis was 4.2 years (SD 2.5). By the end of the 8-year follow up, 19.6% 26.1%, 31.7%, and 22.4% were in sustained remission, terminal remission, relapse, and no remission respectively. Pattern A was identified in 6.5% of the patients, pattern B in 27.1%, pattern C in 43.9%, and pattern Din 22.4%. Univariate analysis revealed that the type of CP, mobility, and number of seizure types, are among the other factors that significantly affected remission.

CONCLUSION

A total of 45% of patients with CP and epilepsy achieved remission (with and without antiepileptics) but after a relatively long treatment duration. Remission was affected by patient- and epilepsy-related factors. More studies are required to further evaluate these factors.

Antiepileptic drug withdrawal in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

Withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has been discouraged in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, impulsivity as a consequence of executive dysfunction in JME may influence treatment adherence. The aim of the present study was to assess how common withdrawal of AEDs is in a large and representative JME group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE) were identified through a retrospective search of medical records at Drammen Hospital, Norway, and invited to a clinical interview. Information related to AED withdrawal was analyzed in those classified as JME.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients with GGE were interviewed (87 JME). Thirty-five patients with JME (40%) discontinued AEDs, of which 74% did so without consulting a doctor. The rate of self-withdrawal was significantly higher in JME than in other types of GGE. Having a parent with psychosocial difficulties was significantly over-represented in the JME self-withdrawal group. Twelve of those who discontinued AEDs (34%) were free from generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) and without antiepileptic drugs >1 year. All but one of them withdrew AEDs without consulting a doctor. Age at first motor seizure was significantly higher in those with a favorable outcome of AED withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-withdrawal of AEDs is common in JME, especially in those with troublesome conditions at home. However, about 1/3 may remain free from GTCS without AEDs. The findings indicate a need for a stronger follow-up with appropriate information about the prognosis of the disorder.

[Epileptic seizures and epilepsy after a stroke : Incidence, prevention and treatment]

Following stroke, 3-6% of patients develop acute symptomatic seizures within the first 7 days. The rate is higher after cerebral haemorrhage compared to ischaemia. In 10-12% of patients, after more than 7 days unprovoked seizures occur. Due to these low incidence rates, primary prophylaxis with antiepileptic drugs is generally not necessary. Following one acute symptomatic seizure, recurrence risk within the first 7 days post-stroke is 10-20%, generally arguing against secondary prophylaxis with an antiepileptic drug. In clinical practice however, antiepileptic drug treatment in this constellation is often initiated. If this is done, the antiepileptic drug should be withdrawn soon after the acute phase, as the long-term risk for manifestation of an unprovoked seizure is approximately 30%. Following one post-stroke unprovoked seizure, recurrence risk within the next 10 years is more than 70%, this defines epilepsy. In this case, antiepileptic drug treatment is regularly recommended.