1
|
Ranjan S, Leung D, Ghiaseddin AP, Taylor JW, Lobbous M, Dhawan A, Budhu JA, Coffee E, Melnick K, Chowdhary SA, Lu-Emerson C, Kurz SC, Burke JE, Lam K, Patel MP, Dunbar EM, Mohile NA, Peters KB. Practical guidance for direct oral anticoagulant use in the treatment of venous thromboembolism in primary and metastatic brain tumor patients. Cancer 2024; 130:1577-1589. [PMID: 38288941 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors (BT) is challenging because of the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). There are no prospective clinical trials evaluating safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), specifically in patients with BT, but they are widely used for VTE in this population. A group of neuro-oncology experts convened to provide practical clinical guidance for the off-label use of DOACs in treating VTE in patients with BT. We searched PubMed for the following terms: BTs, glioma, glioblastoma (GBM), brain metastasis, VTE, heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH), DOACs, and ICH. Although prospective clinical trials are needed, the recommendations presented aim to assist clinicians in making informed decisions regarding DOACs for VTE in patients with BT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surabhi Ranjan
- Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - Denise Leung
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ashley P Ghiaseddin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Jennie W Taylor
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mina Lobbous
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Andrew Dhawan
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Joshua A Budhu
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elizabeth Coffee
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Sajeel A Chowdhary
- Tampa General Hospital Cancer Institute, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Christine Lu-Emerson
- Department of Neurology, Maine Medical Center and Maine Health Cancer Care, Portland, Maine, USA
| | - Sylvia C Kurz
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Joy E Burke
- Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Keng Lam
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mallika P Patel
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Nimish A Mohile
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Katherine B Peters
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Michel M, Peart R, Yan SC, Still MEH, Melnick K, San A, Gonzalez B, Hodges TR, Newman WC, Mbabuike N, Ashley WW, Chowdhury MAB, Rahman M. Academic accomplishments of Black neurosurgeons in the United States. J Neurosurg 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38427994 DOI: 10.3171/2023.12.jns231451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Neurosurgery has remained relatively homogeneous in terms of racial and gender diversity, trailing behind national demographics. Less than 5% of practicing neurosurgeons in the United States identify as Black/African American (AA). Research and academic productivity are highly emphasized within the field and are crucial for career advancement at academic institutions. They also serve as important avenues for mentorship and recruitment of diverse trainees and medical students. This study aimed to summarize the academic accomplishments of AA neurosurgeons by assessing publication quantity, h-index, and federal grant funding. METHODS One hundred thirteen neurosurgery residency training programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education in 2022 were included in this study. The American Society of Black Neurosurgeons registry was reviewed to analyze the academic metrics of self-identified Black or AA academic neurosurgeons. Data on the academic rank, leadership position, publication quantity, h-index, and race of neurosurgical faculty in the US were obtained from publicly available information and program websites. RESULTS Fifty-five AA and 1393 non-AA neurosurgeons were identified. Sixty percent of AA neurosurgeons were fewer than 10 years out from residency training, compared to 37.4% of non-AA neurosurgeons (p = 0.001). AA neurosurgeons had a median 32 (IQR 9, 85) publications compared to 52 (IQR 22, 122) for non-AA neurosurgeons (p = 0.019). AA neurosurgeons had a median h-index of 12 (IQR 5, 24) compared to 16 (IQR 9, 31) for non-AA colleagues (p = 0.02). Following stratification by academic rank, these trends did not persist. No statistically significant differences in the median amounts of awarded National Institutes of Health funding (p = 0.194) or level of professorship attained (p = 0.07) were observed between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Racial disparities between AA and non-AA neurosurgeons exist in publication quantity and h-index overall but not when these groups are stratified by academic rank. Given that AA neurosurgeons comprise more junior faculty, it is expected that their academic accomplishments will increase as more enter academic practice and current neurosurgeons advance into more senior positions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rodeania Peart
- 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Sandra C Yan
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Megan E H Still
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ali San
- 3Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Brandon Gonzalez
- 4Tilman J. Fertitta Family College of Medicine, University of Houston, Texas
| | - Tiffany R Hodges
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - William C Newman
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nnenna Mbabuike
- 7Department of Neurological Surgery, Ascension St. Mary's Hospital, Saginaw, Michigan; and
| | - William W Ashley
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sinai Hospital and LifeBridge Health System, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Maryam Rahman
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peters KB, Templer J, Gerstner ER, Wychowski T, Storstein AM, Dixit K, Walbert T, Melnick K, Hrachova M, Partap S, Ullrich NJ, Ghiaseddin AP, Mrgula M. Discontinuation of Antiseizure Medications in Patients With Brain Tumors. Neurology 2024; 102:e209163. [PMID: 38290092 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000209163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Patients with brain tumors will experience seizures during their disease course. While providers can use antiseizure medications to control these events, patients with brain tumors can experience side effects, ranging from mild to severe, from these medications. Providers in subspecialties such as neurology, neuro-oncology, neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology often work with patients with brain tumor to balance seizure control and the adverse toxicity of antiseizure medications. In this study, we sought to explore the problem of brain tumor-related seizures/epilepsy in the context of how and when to consider antiseizure medication discontinuation. Moreover, we thoroughly evaluate the literature on antiseizure medication discontinuation for adult and pediatric patients and highlight recommendations relevant to patients with both brain tumors and seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine B Peters
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology (K.B.P.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (J.T., K.D.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Neurology (E.R.G.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (T. Wychowski), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (A.M.S.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (T. Walbert), Henry Ford Health, Wayne State University and Michigan State University, Detroit; Neurosurgery (K.M., A.P.G.), University of Florida, Gainesville; Neurosurgery (M.H.), Oklahoma University, Oklahoma City; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (S.P.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Neurology (N.J.U.), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; and Neurology (M.M.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Jessica Templer
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology (K.B.P.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (J.T., K.D.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Neurology (E.R.G.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (T. Wychowski), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (A.M.S.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (T. Walbert), Henry Ford Health, Wayne State University and Michigan State University, Detroit; Neurosurgery (K.M., A.P.G.), University of Florida, Gainesville; Neurosurgery (M.H.), Oklahoma University, Oklahoma City; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (S.P.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Neurology (N.J.U.), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; and Neurology (M.M.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Elizabeth R Gerstner
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology (K.B.P.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (J.T., K.D.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Neurology (E.R.G.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (T. Wychowski), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (A.M.S.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (T. Walbert), Henry Ford Health, Wayne State University and Michigan State University, Detroit; Neurosurgery (K.M., A.P.G.), University of Florida, Gainesville; Neurosurgery (M.H.), Oklahoma University, Oklahoma City; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (S.P.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Neurology (N.J.U.), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; and Neurology (M.M.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Thomas Wychowski
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology (K.B.P.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (J.T., K.D.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Neurology (E.R.G.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (T. Wychowski), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (A.M.S.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (T. Walbert), Henry Ford Health, Wayne State University and Michigan State University, Detroit; Neurosurgery (K.M., A.P.G.), University of Florida, Gainesville; Neurosurgery (M.H.), Oklahoma University, Oklahoma City; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (S.P.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Neurology (N.J.U.), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; and Neurology (M.M.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Anette M Storstein
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology (K.B.P.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (J.T., K.D.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Neurology (E.R.G.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (T. Wychowski), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (A.M.S.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (T. Walbert), Henry Ford Health, Wayne State University and Michigan State University, Detroit; Neurosurgery (K.M., A.P.G.), University of Florida, Gainesville; Neurosurgery (M.H.), Oklahoma University, Oklahoma City; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (S.P.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Neurology (N.J.U.), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; and Neurology (M.M.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Karan Dixit
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology (K.B.P.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (J.T., K.D.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Neurology (E.R.G.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (T. Wychowski), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (A.M.S.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (T. Walbert), Henry Ford Health, Wayne State University and Michigan State University, Detroit; Neurosurgery (K.M., A.P.G.), University of Florida, Gainesville; Neurosurgery (M.H.), Oklahoma University, Oklahoma City; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (S.P.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Neurology (N.J.U.), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; and Neurology (M.M.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Tobias Walbert
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology (K.B.P.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (J.T., K.D.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Neurology (E.R.G.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (T. Wychowski), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (A.M.S.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (T. Walbert), Henry Ford Health, Wayne State University and Michigan State University, Detroit; Neurosurgery (K.M., A.P.G.), University of Florida, Gainesville; Neurosurgery (M.H.), Oklahoma University, Oklahoma City; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (S.P.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Neurology (N.J.U.), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; and Neurology (M.M.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology (K.B.P.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (J.T., K.D.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Neurology (E.R.G.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (T. Wychowski), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (A.M.S.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (T. Walbert), Henry Ford Health, Wayne State University and Michigan State University, Detroit; Neurosurgery (K.M., A.P.G.), University of Florida, Gainesville; Neurosurgery (M.H.), Oklahoma University, Oklahoma City; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (S.P.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Neurology (N.J.U.), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; and Neurology (M.M.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Maya Hrachova
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology (K.B.P.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (J.T., K.D.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Neurology (E.R.G.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (T. Wychowski), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (A.M.S.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (T. Walbert), Henry Ford Health, Wayne State University and Michigan State University, Detroit; Neurosurgery (K.M., A.P.G.), University of Florida, Gainesville; Neurosurgery (M.H.), Oklahoma University, Oklahoma City; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (S.P.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Neurology (N.J.U.), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; and Neurology (M.M.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Sonia Partap
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology (K.B.P.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (J.T., K.D.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Neurology (E.R.G.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (T. Wychowski), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (A.M.S.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (T. Walbert), Henry Ford Health, Wayne State University and Michigan State University, Detroit; Neurosurgery (K.M., A.P.G.), University of Florida, Gainesville; Neurosurgery (M.H.), Oklahoma University, Oklahoma City; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (S.P.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Neurology (N.J.U.), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; and Neurology (M.M.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Nicole J Ullrich
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology (K.B.P.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (J.T., K.D.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Neurology (E.R.G.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (T. Wychowski), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (A.M.S.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (T. Walbert), Henry Ford Health, Wayne State University and Michigan State University, Detroit; Neurosurgery (K.M., A.P.G.), University of Florida, Gainesville; Neurosurgery (M.H.), Oklahoma University, Oklahoma City; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (S.P.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Neurology (N.J.U.), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; and Neurology (M.M.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Ashley P Ghiaseddin
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology (K.B.P.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (J.T., K.D.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Neurology (E.R.G.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (T. Wychowski), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (A.M.S.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (T. Walbert), Henry Ford Health, Wayne State University and Michigan State University, Detroit; Neurosurgery (K.M., A.P.G.), University of Florida, Gainesville; Neurosurgery (M.H.), Oklahoma University, Oklahoma City; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (S.P.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Neurology (N.J.U.), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; and Neurology (M.M.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Maciej Mrgula
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology (K.B.P.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (J.T., K.D.), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Neurology (E.R.G.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (T. Wychowski), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (A.M.S.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (T. Walbert), Henry Ford Health, Wayne State University and Michigan State University, Detroit; Neurosurgery (K.M., A.P.G.), University of Florida, Gainesville; Neurosurgery (M.H.), Oklahoma University, Oklahoma City; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics (S.P.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Neurology (N.J.U.), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; and Neurology (M.M.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Porche K, Mohan A, Dow J, Melnick K, Laurent D, Hoh B, Murad G. Automated and Optimized Neurosurgery Scheduling System Improves Resident Satisfaction. Neurosurgery 2024:00006123-990000000-01013. [PMID: 38189465 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Neurosurgery residency involves a complex structure with multiple hospitals, services, and clinic days, leading to challenges in creating equitable call schedules. Manually prepared scheduling systems are prone to biases, error, and perceived unfairness. To address these issues, we developed an automated scheduling system (Automated Optimization of Neurosurgery Scheduling System [AONSS]) to reduce biases, accommodate resident requests, and optimize call variation, ultimately enhancing the educational experience by promoting diverse junior-senior-attending relationships. METHODS AONSS was developed and tailored to the University of Florida program, with inaugural use in 2021-2022 and mandatory implementation in the 2022-2023 academic year. 2019-2021 academic years were used as control. Residents were surveyed using Google Forms before and after implementation to assess its impact. Outcome measures included call and pairing variations, duty hours, as well as subjective factors such as satisfaction, fairness, and perceived biases. RESULTS Twenty-six residents (28%-39% female/year) were included in the study. AONSS was used for 6/13 blocks during the 2021-2022 academic year and 13/13 blocks for the 2022-2023 academic year. Overall call variation reduced by 70%. All other objective secondary measures have improved with AONSS. Weekly and monthly duty hours were reduced and less varied. Satisfaction scores improved from 21% reporting being somewhat satisfied or very satisfied to 90%. Fairness scores improved from 43% reporting being somewhat fair or very fair to 95%. Perception of gender bias decreased from 29% to 0%. No resident felt there was racial bias in either system. CONCLUSION Our newly developed automated scheduling system effectively reduces variation among calls in a complex neurosurgery residency, which, in return, was found to increase residents' satisfaction with their schedule, improve their perception of fairness with the schedule, and has completely removed the perception of sexual bias in a program that has a large percentage of females. In addition, it was found to be associated with decreased duty hours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Porche
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Arvind Mohan
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Jamie Dow
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Dimitri Laurent
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Brian Hoh
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Gregory Murad
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mehkri Y, Windermere SA, Still MEH, Yan SC, Goutnik M, Melnick K, Doonan B, Ghiaseddin AP, Rahman M. The Safety and Efficacy of Concurrent Immune Checkpoint Blockade and Stereotactic Radiosurgery Therapy with Practitioner and Researcher Recommendations. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:e133-e153. [PMID: 37739175 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown growing promise in the treatment of brain metastases, especially combined with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The combination of ICIs with SRS has been studied for efficacy as well as increasing radiation necrosis risks. In this review, we compare clinical outcomes of radiation necrosis, intracranial control, and overall survival between patients with brain metastases treated with either SRS alone or SRS-ICI combination therapy. METHODS A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane was performed in May 2023 for articles comparing the safety and efficacy of SRS/ICI versus SRS-alone for treating brain metastases. RESULTS The search criteria identified 1961 articles, of which 48 met inclusion criteria. Combination therapy with SRS and ICI does not lead to significant increases in incidence of radiation necrosis either radiographically or symptomatically. Overall, no difference was found in intracranial control between SRS-alone and SRS-ICI combination therapy. Combination therapy is associated with increased median overall survival. Notably, some comparative studies observed decreased neurologic deaths, challenging presumptions that improved survival is due to greater systemic control. The literature supports SRS-ICI administration within 4 weeks of another for survival but remains inconclusive, requiring further study for other outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS Combination SRS-ICI therapy is associated with significant overall survival benefit for patients with brain metastases without significantly increasing radiation necrosis risks compared to SRS alone. Although intracranial control rates appear to be similar between the 2 groups, timing of treatment delivery may improve control rates and demands further study attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuf Mehkri
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Megan E H Still
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Sandra C Yan
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Goutnik
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Bently Doonan
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ashley P Ghiaseddin
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Maryam Rahman
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goutnik M, Iakovidis A, Still MEH, Moor RSF, Melnick K, Yan S, Abbas M, Huang J, Ghiaseddin AP. Advancements in chimeric antigen receptor-expressing T-cell therapy for glioblastoma multiforme: Literature review and future directions. Neurooncol Adv 2024; 6:vdae025. [PMID: 38486856 PMCID: PMC10939440 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive cancer that has been difficult to treat and often requires multimodal therapy consisting of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Chimeric antigen receptor-expressing (CAR-T) cells have been efficacious in treating hematological malignancies, resulting in several FDA-approved therapies. CAR-T cells have been more recently studied for the treatment of GBM, with some promising preclinical and clinical results. The purpose of this literature review is to highlight the commonly targeted antigens, results of clinical trials, novel modifications, and potential solutions for challenges that exist for CAR-T cells to become more widely implemented and effective in eradicating GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Goutnik
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Alexandria Iakovidis
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Megan E H Still
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Rachel S F Moor
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Sandra Yan
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Muhammad Abbas
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Jianping Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ashley P Ghiaseddin
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yan S, Melnick K, He X, Lyu T, Moor RSF, Still MEH, Mitchell DA, Shenkman EA, Wang H, Guo Y, Bian J, Ghiaseddin AP. Developing a computable phenotype for glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2023:noad249. [PMID: 38141226 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor, and thus it is important to be able to identify patients with this diagnosis for population studies. However, this can be challenging as diagnostic codes are non-specific. The aim of this study was to create a computable phenotype (CP) for GBM from structured and unstructured data to identify patients with this condition in a large electronic health record (EHR). METHODS We used the UF Health Integrated Data Repository, a centralized clinical data warehouse that stores clinical and research data from various sources within the UF Health system, including the EHR system. We performed multiple iterations to refine the GBM-relevant diagnosis codes, procedure codes, medication codes, and keywords through manual chart review of patient data. We then evaluated the performances of various possible proposed CPs constructed from the relevant codes and keywords. RESULTS We underwent six rounds of manual chart reviews to refine the CP elements. The final CP algorithm for identifying GBM patients was selected based on the best F1-score. Overall, the CP rule "if the patient had at least 1 relevant diagnosis code and at least 1 relevant keyword" demonstrated the highest F1-score using both structured and unstructured data. Thus, it was selected as the best-performing CP rule. CONCLUSIONS We developed a CP algorithm for identifying patients with GBM using both structured and unstructured EHR data from a large tertiary care center. The final algorithm achieved an F1-score of 0.817, indicating a high performance which minimizes possible biases from misclassification errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Yan
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, FL, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, FL, USA
| | - Xing He
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, FL, USA
- Cancer Informatics Shared Resource, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, FL, USA
| | - Tianchen Lyu
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, FL, USA
- Cancer Informatics Shared Resource, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, FL, USA
| | - Rachel S F Moor
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, FL, USA
| | - Megan E H Still
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, FL, USA
| | - Duane A Mitchell
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, FL, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Shenkman
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, FL, USA
- Cancer Informatics Shared Resource, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, FL, USA
| | - Han Wang
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, FL, USA
| | - Yi Guo
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, FL, USA
- Cancer Informatics Shared Resource, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, FL, USA
| | - Jiang Bian
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, FL, USA
- Cancer Informatics Shared Resource, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, FL, USA
| | - Ashley P Ghiaseddin
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Melnick K, Porche K, Sriram S, Goutnik M, Cuneo M, Murad G, Chalouhi N, Polifka A, Hoh DJ, Decker M. Evaluation of patients referred to the spine clinic via telemedicine and the impact on diagnosis and surgical decision-making. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 39:600-606. [PMID: 37410606 DOI: 10.3171/2023.5.spine23182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Telemedicine encounters are expanding in utility for outpatient care and evaluation, partially as a necessity during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unclear if telemedicine evaluation is comparable to in-person assessment of patients with spinal pathology undergoing surgical consultation. The objective of this study was to determine if treatment plans change for spine patients evaluated in person following an initial telemedicine consultation. METHODS Patients referred to the authors' comprehensive spine center were evaluated first via telemedicine and then in clinic. Telemedicine evaluations were conducted via video evaluation with an attending surgeon. Demographic data including age, gender, and distance traveled from the clinic were retrospectively recorded. A chart review retrieved symptoms, radiographic details, and past medical history. The primary outcome was if the treatment plan changed (plan change [PC]) after seeing the patient in the clinic. Chi-square tests and binary logistical regression produced uni- and multivariate analyses. RESULTS There were 152 new patients seen via telemedicine and in person. Pathology was present in the cervical (28.3%), thoracic (9.9%), and lumbar (61.8%) spine. The most common symptom was pain (72.4%), followed by radiculopathy (66.4%), weakness (26.3%), myelopathy (15.1%), and claudication (12.5%). There were 37 patients (24.3%) for whom there was a PC after clinic evaluation, and of those, only 5 (3.3%) were due to physical examination (PCPE) findings. On univariate analysis, a longer duration between telemedicine and clinic visit (odds ratio [OR] 1.094 per 7 days, p = 0.003), having pathology in the thoracic spine (OR 3.963, p = 0.018) and lack of sufficient imaging (OR 25.455, p < 0.0001) were predictive of a PC. Having pathology in the cervical spine (OR 9.538, p = 0.047) and adjacent-segment disease (OR 11.471, p = 0.010) were predictive of a PCPE. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that telemedicine may be an effective modality for the initial evaluation of spine surgical patients, without compromising decision-making in the absence of an in-person physical examination.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ernster AE, Body A, Deleyrolle P, St Clair J, Sampson D, Bacharz K, Yan SC, Melnick K, Allen A, Rahman M, Tran DD, Mitchell DA, Pereira DB, Ghiaseddin AP. Patterns and predictors of anxiety and depression symptom trajectories in patients diagnosed with primary brain tumors. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:701-710. [PMID: 37804375 PMCID: PMC10695656 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04469-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with primary brain tumors (pPBTs) often exhibit heightened distress. This study assesses how symptoms of anxiety and depression change over time in pPBTs and identifies factors that may predict patients' symptom trajectories. METHODS Ninety-nine adult pPBTs completed psychosocial assessments at neuro-oncology appointments over 6-18 months. Quality of life was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain; symptoms of anxiety and depression were assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System short forms. The prevalence of patients with clinically elevated symptoms and those who experienced clinically meaningful changes in symptoms throughout follow-up were examined. Linear mixed-effects models evaluated changes in symptoms over time at the group level, and latent class growth analysis (LCGA) evaluated changes in symptoms over time at the individual level. RESULTS At enrollment, 51.5% and 32.3% of patients exhibited clinically elevated levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. Of patients with follow-up data (n = 74), 54.1% and 50% experienced clinically meaningful increases in anxiety and depression scores, respectively. There were no significant changes in anxiety or depression scores over time, but better physical, functional, and brain-cancer well-being predicted lower levels of anxiety and depression (p < 0.001). Five sub-groups of patients with distinct symptom trajectories emerged via LCGA. CONCLUSIONS pPBTs commonly experience elevated symptoms of anxiety and depression that may fluctuate in clinically meaningful manners throughout the disease. Routine screening for elevated symptoms is needed to capture clinically meaningful changes and identify factors affecting symptoms to intervene on.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alayna E Ernster
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David D Tran
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Ashley P Ghiaseddin
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Clinical Translational and Research Building, 2004 Mowry Road, PO Box 100219, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peart R, Melnick K, Cibula J, Walbert T, Gerstner ER, Rahman M, Peters KB, Mrugala M, Ghiaseddin A. Clinical management of seizures in patients with meningiomas: Efficacy of surgical resection for seizure control and patient-tailored postoperative anti-epileptic drug management. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:i58-i66. [PMID: 37287578 PMCID: PMC10243854 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumor. They are slow growing and often incidentally found tumors that arise from the arachnoid villi. As they grow, they have a greater likelihood of becoming symptomatic with seizures being one of the most clinically significant symptoms. Seizures are more likely to present as a symptom of larger meningiomas and meningiomas that compress cortical areas particularly those in non-skull base locations. These seizures are often managed medically, utilizing the same anti-seizure medications that are used to treat other causes of epilepsy. We discuss common anti-seizure medications used including valproate, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, phenytoin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam and topiramate and their common adverse effects. The goal of pharmacotherapy for seizure control is to maximize seizure control while minimizing the adverse effects of the medication. The decision to provide medical management is dependent on individual seizure history and plans for surgical treatment. Patients who did not require seizure prophylaxis before surgery are commonly prescribed seizure prophylaxis postoperatively. Symptomatic meningiomas not controlled by medical management alone are commonly evaluated for surgical resection. The efficacy of surgical resection in providing seizure freedom is dependent on several features of the tumor including tumor size, the extent of the peritumoral edema, the number of tumors, sinus infiltration and the degree of resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodeania Peart
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- Kaitlyn Melnick, MD, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, PO Box 100265, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA ()
| | - Jean Cibula
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Tobias Walbert
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health and Department of Neurology Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Elizabeth R Gerstner
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Maryam Rahman
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Katherine B Peters
- Department of Neurology, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Maciej Mrugala
- Department of Neurology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Ashley Ghiaseddin
- Corresponding Authors: Ashley Ghiaseddin, MD, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, PO Box 100265, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA ()
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Porche K, Yan SC, Mehkri Y, Sriram S, MacNeil A, Melnick K, Garvan C, Vaziri S, Seubert C, Murad G, Decker M, Polifka A, Hoh DJ, Mohamed B. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for posterior cervical surgery: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study. J Neurosurg Spine 2023:1-12. [PMID: 37119104 PMCID: PMC10193465 DOI: 10.3171/2023.2.spine221174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is a comprehensive, multifaceted approach aimed at improving postoperative outcomes. It incorporates a range of strategies to promote early and more effective recovery, including reducing pain, complications, and length of stay, without increasing readmission rate. To date, ERAS for spine surgery patients has been primarily limited to lumbar surgery and anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). ERAS has not been previously studied for posterior cervical surgery, which may present a greater opportunity for improvement in patient outcomes with ERAS than ACDF. This single-institution, multi-surgeon study assessed the impact of an ERAS protocol in patients undergoing posterior cervical decompression surgery. METHODS This study included a retrospective consecutive patient cohort with controls that were propensity matched for age, body mass index, sex, home opioid use, surgical levels, Nurick grade, and smoking status. In addition, consecutive patients who underwent posterior cervical decompression surgery for degenerative disease from December 2014 to December 2021 were included. ERAS was implemented in December 2018. Demographic, perioperative, clinical, and radiographic information was gathered. Regression models were created to evaluate length of stay, physiological function, pain levels, and opioid use. The primary focus was length of stay, with secondary outcomes including timing of ambulation, bowel movement, and voiding; daily pain scores; opioid consumption; discharge status; 30-day readmission rates; and reoperation rates. RESULTS There were 366 patients included in the study, all of whom were included in multivariate models, and 254 (127 in each cohort) were included on the basis of matching. After propensity matching, patient characteristics, operative procedures, and operative duration were similar between groups. The ERAS cohort had a significantly improved length of stay (3.2 vs 4.7 days, p < 0.0001) and home discharge rate (80% vs 50%, p < 0.001) without an increase in readmission rate. The ERAS cohort had an earlier day of the first ambulation (p = 0.003), bowel movement (p = 0.014), and voiding (p = 0.001). ERAS demonstrated a significantly lower composite complication rate (1.1 vs 1.8, p < 0.0001). ERAS resulted in better maximum pain scores (p = 0.043) and trended toward improved mean pain scores (p = 0.072), although total opioid use was similar. CONCLUSIONS Implementing a novel ERAS protocol significantly improved length of stay, return of physiological function, home discharge, complications, and maximum pain score after posterior cervical surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Porche
- 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
- 2Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville; and
| | - Sandra C Yan
- 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
- 2Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville; and
| | - Yusuf Mehkri
- 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Sai Sriram
- 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Andrew MacNeil
- 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
- 2Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville; and
| | - Cynthia Garvan
- 3Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Sasha Vaziri
- 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
- 2Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville; and
| | - Christoph Seubert
- 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
- 3Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Gregory Murad
- 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
- 2Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville; and
| | - Matthew Decker
- 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
- 2Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville; and
| | - Adam Polifka
- 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
- 2Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville; and
| | - Daniel J Hoh
- 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
- 2Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville; and
| | - Basma Mohamed
- 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville
- 3Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Melnick K, Yan S, Ghiaseddin A, Rahman M. In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding "Histologic Findings at the Time of Repeat Resection Predicts Survival in Patients with Glioblastoma". World Neurosurg 2023; 170:258. [PMID: 36782416 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.12.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn Melnick
- Neurological Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
| | - Sandra Yan
- Neurological Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ashley Ghiaseddin
- Neurological Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Maryam Rahman
- Neurological Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rahman M, Eisenschenk S, Melnick K, Wang Y, Heaton S, Ghiaseddin A, Hodik M, McGrew N, Smith J, Murad G, Roper S, Cibula J. Duration of Prophylactic Levetiracetam After Surgery for Brain Tumor: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Neurosurgery 2023; 92:68-74. [PMID: 36156532 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Levetiracetam is commonly used as a prophylactic antiseizure medication in patients undergoing surgical resection of brain tumors. OBJECTIVE To quantitate side effects experienced in patients treated with 1 week vs 6 weeks of prophylactic levetiracetam using validated measures for neurotoxicity and depression. METHODS Patients undergoing surgical resection of a supratentorial tumor with no seizure history were randomized within 48 hours of surgery to receive prophylactic levetiracetam for the duration of either 1 or 6 weeks. Patients were given oral levetiracetam extended release 1000 mg during the first part of this study. Owing to drug backorder, patients enrolled later in this study received levetiracetam 500 mg BID. The primary outcome was the change in the neurotoxicity score 6 weeks after drug initiation. The secondary outcome was seizure incidence. RESULTS A total of 81 patients were enrolled and randomized to 1 week (40 patients) or 6 weeks (41 patients) of prophylactic levetiracetam treatment. The neurotoxicity score slightly improved in the overall cohort between baseline and reassessment. There was no significant difference between groups in neurotoxicity or depression scores. Seizure incidence was low in the entire cohort of patients with 1 patient in each arm experiencing a seizure during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION The use of prophylactic levetiracetam did not result in significant neurotoxicity or depression when given for either 1 week or 6 weeks. The incidence of seizure after craniotomy for tumor resection is low regardless of duration of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Rahman
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Yu Wang
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, UF Health Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Shelley Heaton
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ashley Ghiaseddin
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Marcia Hodik
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Nina McGrew
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Jessica Smith
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Greg Murad
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Steven Roper
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Jean Cibula
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Porche K, Yan S, Mohamed B, Garvan C, Samra R, Melnick K, Vaziri S, Seubert C, Decker M, Polifka A, Hoh DJ. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) improves return of physiological function in frail patients undergoing one- to two-level TLIFs: an observational retrospective cohort study. Spine J 2022; 22:1513-1522. [PMID: 35447326 PMCID: PMC9534035 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a multimodal approach which has been shown to facilitate recovery of physiological function, and reduce early post-operative pain, complications, and length of stay (LOS) in open one- to two-level TLIF. The benefit of ERAS in specifically frail patients undergoing TLIF has not been demonstrated. Frailty is clinically defined as a syndrome of physiological decline that can predispose patients undergoing surgery to poor outcomes. PURPOSE This study primarily evaluated the benefit of an ERAS protocol in frail patients undergoing one- or two-level open TLIF compared to frail patients without ERAS. Secondarily, we assessed whether outcomes in frail patients with ERAS approximated those seen in nonfrail patients with ERAS. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective consecutive patient cohort with controls propensity-matched for age, body mass index, sex, and smoking status. PATIENT SAMPLE Consecutive patients that underwent one- or two-level open TLIF for degenerative disease from August, 2015 to July, 2021 by a single surgeon. ERAS was implemented in December 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measure was return of postoperative physiological function defined as the summation of first day to ambulate, first day to bowel movement, and first day to void. Additional outcome measures included LOS, daily average pain scores, opioid use, discharge disposition, 30-day readmission rate, and reoperation. METHODS A retrospective analysis of frail patients > 65 years of age undergoing one- to two-level open TLIF post-ERAS were compared to propensity matched frail pre-ERAS patients. Frailty was assessed using the Fried phenotype classification (score >1). Patient demographics, LOS, first-day-to-ambulate (A1), first-day-to-bowel movement (B1), first-day-to-void (V1) were collected. Return of physiological function was defined as A1+B1+V1. Primary analysis was a comparison of frail patients pre-ERAS versus post-ERAS to determine effect of ERAS on return of physiologic function with frailty. Secondary analysis was a comparison of post-ERAS frail versus post-ERAS nonfrail patients to determine if return of physiologic function in frail patients with ERAS approximates that of nonfrail patients. RESULTS In the primary analysis, 32 frail patients were included with mean age ± standard deviation of 72.8±4.4 years, mean BMI 28.8±5.5, 65.6% were male, 15 pre-ERAS and 17 post-ERAS. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. After ERAS implementation, return of physiological function improved by a mean 3.2 days overall (post-ERAS 3.4 vs. pre-ERAS 6.7 days) (p<.0001), indicating a positive effect of ERAS in frail patients. Additionally, length of stay improved by 1 day (4.8±1.6 vs. 3.8±1.9 days, p<.0001). Total daily intravenous morphine milligram equivalent (MME) as well as average daily pain scores were similar between groups. Secondarily, 26 nonfrail patients post ERAS were used as a comparison group with the 17 post-ERAS frail cohort. Mean age of this cohort was 73.4±4.6 years, mean BMI 27.4±4.9, and 61.9% were male. Return of physiologic function was similar between cohorts (post-ERAS nonfrail 3.5 vs. post-ERAS frail 3.4 days) (p=.938), indicating the benefit with ERAS in frail patients approximates that of nonfrail patients. CONCLUSIONS ERAS significantly improves return of physiologic function and length of stay in patients with frailty after one- to two-level TLIF, and approximates improved outcomes seen in non-frail patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Porche
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608; 1505 SW Archer Rd, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA.
| | - Sandra Yan
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1505 SW Archer Rd, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Basma Mohamed
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1600 SW Archer Road, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608
| | - Cynthia Garvan
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1600 SW Archer Road, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608
| | - Ronny Samra
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1505 SW Archer Rd, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Sasha Vaziri
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1505 SW Archer Rd, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Christoph Seubert
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1600 SW Archer Road, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608
| | - Matthew Decker
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1505 SW Archer Rd, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Adam Polifka
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1505 SW Archer Rd, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Daniel J. Hoh
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1505 SW Archer Rd, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Porche K, Samra R, Melnick K, Brennan M, Vaziri S, Seubert C, Polifka A, Hoh DJ, Mohamed B. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study. Spine J 2022; 22:399-410. [PMID: 34687905 PMCID: PMC9595392 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a multidisciplinary, multimodal approach which has been shown to facilitate recovery of physiological function, and reduce postoperative pain, complication rates, and length of stay without adversely affecting readmission rates. Design and implementation of ERAS protocols in the recent spine surgery literature has primarily focused on patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar surgery. However, conventional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) remains a common procedure and to date there are no studies assessing an ERAS protocol in this patient population. PURPOSE This study presents a single surgeon experience implementing an ERAS protocol in patients undergoing 1- or 2-level open TLIF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective consecutive patient cohort with controls propensity-matched for age, body mass index, sex, and smoking status. PATIENT SAMPLE Consecutive patients that underwent 1- or 2-level open TLIF for degenerative disease from 12/2018 - 02/2021 and controls from 12/2011-12/2017 by a single surgeon. ERAS was implemented in December 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES Primary: length of stay; Secondary: first day to ambulate, first day to bowel movement, first day to void, daily average and maximum pain scores, opioid use, discharge disposition, 30-day readmission rate, and re-operations. METHODS Demographic, perioperative, clinical, radiographic data were collected. Multivariate mixed-linear regression models were developed for length of stay, physiological function, pain scales, and opiate use. RESULTS There were 114 patients included with 57 in each cohort. After propensity matching, patient characteristics were similar between groups. Operative time decreased significantly after institution of ERAS (170±44 vs. 141±37 minutes, p <.0001) as did length of stay (4.6±1.7 vs. 3.6±1.6 days, p<.0001). First day of ambulation, bowel movement, and bladder voiding improved by 0.8 (p<.0001), 0.7 (p=.008), and 0.8 (p<.0001) days, respectively, in the ERAS cohort. Total daily intravenous morphine milligram equivalent (MME) (8±9 vs. 36±38, p<0.0001) and total 72-hour MME consumption (53±33 vs. 68±48, p<.0001) was significantly lower in the ERAS cohort; however, 72-hour MME consumption was not found to be significantly different in a sensitivity analysis controlling for preoperative MME. Average daily pain scores were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS Consistent with other studies demonstrating benefit of an ERAS protocol for minimally invasive spine procedures, ERAS was associated with decreased operative time, reduced length of stay, decrease in IV opioid consumption, and improved physiological outcomes for open 1- and 2-level TLIF. ERAS can be a potentially effective strategy for improving patient outcome and efficiency of healthcare resources for common conventional spinal surgeries such as open TLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Porche
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Ronny Samra
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Meghan Brennan
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Sasha Vaziri
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Christoph Seubert
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Adam Polifka
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Daniel J Hoh
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Basma Mohamed
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Grady C, Melnick K, Porche K, Dastmalchi F, Hoh DJ, Rahman M, Ghiaseddin A. Glioma Immunotherapy: Advances and Challenges for Spinal Cord Gliomas. Neurospine 2022; 19:13-29. [PMID: 35130421 PMCID: PMC8987559 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2143210.605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord gliomas are rare entities that often have limited surgical options. Immunotherapy has shown promise in intracranial gliomas with some research suggesting benefit for spinal cord gliomas. A focused review of immunotherapies that have been investigated in spinal cord gliomas was performed. The primary methods of immunotherapy investigated in spinal cord gliomas include immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive T-cell therapies, and vaccine strategies. There are innumerable challenges that must be overcome to effectively apply immunotherapeutic strategies to the spinal cord gliomas including low incidence, few antigenic targets, the blood spinal cord barrier, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and neurotoxic treatment effects. Nonetheless, research has suggested ways to overcome these challenges and treatments have been effective in case reports for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, midline glioma and glioblastoma. Current therapies for spinal cord gliomas are markedly limited. Further research is needed to determine if the success of immunotherapy for intracranial gliomas can be effectively applied to these unique tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Grady
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA,Corresponding Author Kaitlyn Melnick https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2657-2176 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Box 100265, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ken Porche
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Farhad Dastmalchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Daniel J. Hoh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Maryam Rahman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ashley Ghiaseddin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Melnick K, Grady C, Cuneo M, Rahman M. In Reply to the to Letter to the Editor Regarding "Academic Accomplishments of Female Neurosurgeons Currently in Practice in the United States". World Neurosurg 2021; 154:198. [PMID: 34583491 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn Melnick
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
| | - Clare Grady
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Micaela Cuneo
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Maryam Rahman
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Melnick K, Grady C, Cuneo M, Brennan M, Rahman M. Academic Accomplishments of Female Neurosurgeons Currently in Practice in the United States. World Neurosurg 2021; 150:20-25. [PMID: 33722726 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women have now surpassed men in the number of medical students currently enrolled in the United States. However, in surgical subspecialties including neurosurgery, women continue to be significantly underrepresented. The objective of this study was to investigate the academic accomplishments of women in academic neurosurgery as measured by academic title, publications, and grant funding. METHODS A list of ACGME (Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education) accredited neurosurgery departments was utilized and department websites were reviewed to collect data regarding female and male faculty. Scopus and National Institutes of Health (NIH) RePORTER websites were used to collect other variables. RESULTS Women comprise 11.0% of all academic neurosurgeons. Of the 116 neurosurgery residency programs in the United States, 77% have at least 1 female faculty member. There are 172 academic female neurosurgeons in practice in the United States currently. Of academic female neurosurgeons, 61% are assistant professors, 21% are associate professors, and 18% are professors. Only 20 women hold leadership positions in their departments. Women have an average of 39.7 49.6 publications. The average h-index of academic female neurosurgeons is 12.0 11.1. Twenty-two women have or have had NIH funding with an average cumulative total grant value of $3,409,919. Having NIH funding and more publications is associated with higher academic rank and holding a leadership position. Women have significantly less funding and publications than men. CONCLUSIONS Women represent younger faculty with expected publication and grant funding productivity. As women continue to advance into more senior positions, the trends for number of publications and grant funding is expected to increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn Melnick
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
| | - Clare Grady
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Micaela Cuneo
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Meghan Brennan
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Maryam Rahman
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
McKay RR, Zukotynski KA, Werner L, Voznesensky O, Wu JS, Smith SE, Jiang Z, Melnick K, Yuan X, Kantoff PW, Montgomery B, Balk SP, Taplin ME. Imaging, procedural and clinical variables associated with tumor yield on bone biopsy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2014; 17:325-31. [PMID: 25091040 DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2014.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2014] [Revised: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 06/16/2014] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the mechanisms driving disease progression is fundamental to identifying new therapeutic targets for the treatment of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Owing to the prevalence of bone metastases in mCRPC, obtaining sufficient tumor tissue for analysis has historically been a challenge. In this exploratory analysis, we evaluated imaging, procedural and clinical variables associated with tumor yield on image-guided bone biopsy in men with mCRPC. METHODS Clinical data were collected prospectively from men with mCRPC enrolled on a phase II trial with serial metastasis biopsies performed according to standard clinical protocol. Imaging was retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the percent positive biopsy cores (PPC), calculated as the number of positive cores divided by the total number of cores collected per biopsy. RESULTS Twenty-nine men had 39 bone biopsies. Seventy-seven percent of bone biopsies had at least one positive biopsy core. We determined that lesion size and distance from the skin to the lesion edge correlated with tumor yield on biopsy (median PPC 75% versus 42% for lesions >8.8 cm(3) versus ⩽ 8.8 cm(3), respectively, P=0.05; median PPC 33% versus 71% for distance ⩾ 6.1 versus <6.1 cm, respectively, P = 0.02). There was a trend towards increased tumor yield in patients with increased uptake on radionuclide bone scan, higher calcium levels and shorter duration of osteoclast-targeting therapy, although this was not statistically significant. Ten men had 14 soft tissue biopsies. All soft tissue biopsies had at least one positive biopsy core. CONCLUSIONS This exploratory analysis suggests that there are imaging, procedural and clinical variables that have an impact on image-guided bone biopsy yield. In order to maximize harvest of prostate cancer tissue, we have incorporated a prospective analysis of the metrics described here as part of a multi-institutional project aiming to use the molecular characterization of mCRPC tumors to direct individual therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R R McKay
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - K A Zukotynski
- 1] Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada [2] Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - L Werner
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - O Voznesensky
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - J S Wu
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - S E Smith
- 1] Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA [2] Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Z Jiang
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - K Melnick
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - X Yuan
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - P W Kantoff
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - B Montgomery
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - S P Balk
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M-E Taplin
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Melnick K. A day in the life of a VIP II coordinator. Del Med J 2001; 73:459-60. [PMID: 11776960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
|
21
|
|