Seizure frequency in pregnant women treated with lamotrigine monotherapy

UGT polymorphisms and epileptic seizure control in pregnant women treated with Lamotrigine

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether polymorphisms of selected uridine-diphospho-glucuronosyl-tranferases (UGT) involved in Lamotrigine (LTG) metabolism are associated with seizure control during pregnancy and post-partum in women with epilepsy treated with LTG.

METHODS

Single nucleotide polymorphisms for UGT1A4 * 2 (P24T, c.70 C>A), UGT1A4 * 3 (L48V c.142 T > G) and UGT2B7 * 2 (H268Y, c.802 C>T), were determined in 47 pregnancies in 40 non-smoking women with LTG-treated epilepsy. Retrospectively collected data included seizure type and frequency, LTG dosage and LTG plasma level changes during pregnancy and PP. We evaluated the effect of UGT genotype on seizure control throughout pregnancy and post-partum (T1-PP).

RESULTS

In 47 pregnancies, seizure control was achieved in 60 % in T1-PP. Occurrence of seizures T1-PP was not directly associated with UGT genotype, but with having pre-pregnant seizures within the past 6 months (OR 8.33 (95 % CI 1.53-45.41, p = 0.01) and 12 months (OR 5.25, 95 % CI 1.47-18.77, p = 0.02) preceding pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

We did not observe any proximate effect of UGT genotypes on seizure control during pregnancy and post-partum in women treated with LTG, but seizures within the year preceding pregnancy had a significant impact.

Step Climb Dosing Guidance From Simulation Studies on Lamotrigine Concentration Changes During Pregnancy

Empiric Dosing Strategies to Predict Lamotrigine Concentrations During Pregnancy Barry JM, French JA, Pennell PB, Karanam A, Harden CL, Birnbaum AK. Pharmacotherapy . 2023;43(10):998-1006. doi:10.1002/phar.2856 . PMID: 37475496 Introduction: Maintaining seizure control with lamotrigine is complicated by altered pharmacokinetics and existence of subpopulations in whom clearance increases or remains constant during pregnancy. Objective: Our objective was to characterize the potential for particular dosing scenarios to lead to increased seizure risk or toxicity. Methods: Lamotrigine pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from our previous study were applied to a one-compartment model structure with subpopulations (75:25%) exhibiting different clearance changes. A single-patient simulation was conducted with typical pharmacokinetic parameter values from each subpopulation. Population-level simulations (N = 48,000) included six dosing scenarios and considered four preconception doses using the R package mrgsolve (Metrum Research Group). Thresholds for efficacy and toxicity were selected as drug concentration that are 65% lower than preconception concentrations and doubling of preconception concentrations, respectively. Results: Individual simulation results demonstrated that without dose increases, concentrations fell below 0.65 at 6-8 weeks in the high clearance change (HC) subpopulation, depending on preconception clearance. While no simulated dosing regimen allowed all women in both subpopulations to maintain preconception concentrations, some regimens provided a more balanced risk profile than others. Predicted concentrations suggested potential increased seizure risk for 7%-100% of women in the HC group depending on preconception dose and subpopulation. Additionally, in 63% of dosing scenarios for women with low clearance change (LC), there was an increased risk of toxicity (34%-100% of women). Significance: A substantial percentage of simulated individuals had concentrations low enough to potentially increase seizure risk or high enough to create toxicity. Early clearance changes indicate possible subpopulation categorization if therapeutic drug monitoring is conducted in the first trimester. An arbitrary “one-size-fits-all” philosophy may not work well for lamotrigine dosing adjustments during pregnancy and reinforces the need for therapeutic drug monitoring until a patient is determined to be in the LC or HC group.

Dose Monitoring of Lamotrigine Monotherapy in Pregnancy: Are Pregnant Women with Epilepsy Currently Optimally Managed? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Lamotrigine monotherapy is the first-line treatment for epilepsy in pregnant women. However, altered pharmacokinetics during pregnancy can lead to suboptimal drug levels and increased seizure risk. This systematic review aimed to evaluate current therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) strategies for lamotrigine monotherapy in pregnant women with epilepsy and provide guidance for monitoring and dose adjustments.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using the Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, and Ovid-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Studies were included if data on lamotrigine dosing, concentration, TDM strategies, efficacy, or safety were available.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were analyzed, revealing heterogeneity in outcomes with selective reporting of TDM strategies; however, clear similarities were observed. Blood samples were collected every 1-3 months during pregnancy to maintain prepregnancy baseline drug levels. Lamotrigine's apparent and relative clearance increased across trimesters, particularly in the second and third trimesters, coinciding with a period of increased seizure frequency and required dose adjustments. Details on dose adjustments were limited. Some studies have proposed using the threshold of the ratio to the target concentration to predict increased seizure risk. No distinct association was observed between adverse newborn outcomes and lamotrigine dose or serum concentration. Few maternal adverse effects have been reported after delivery, confirming the necessity of empirical postpartum tapering.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are required to establish evidence-based standardized protocols encompassing all aspects of TDM. Early interventions, such as empirical dose increases during pregnancy and postpartum tapering, and routine monitoring from preconception to the postpartum period may enhance seizure control, reducing the risk of breakthrough seizures for the mother and unborn child.

Anti-Seizure Monotherapy and Early Abortion Under Real-World Conditions

Background

Most pregnant epilepsy patients need to continue using anti-seizure medications (ASMs) to control epileptic seizures.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of early abortion in pregnant epilepsy patients exposed to anti-seizure monotherapy.

Methods and Material

We prospectively followed up pregnant epilepsy patients treated with anti-seizure monotherapy in our epilepsy center between January 2010 and January 2020 under real-world conditions. Early abortion (spontaneous abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy) was the endpoint.

Results

Of 211 pregnancies exposed to monotherapy, including 40% (n = 85) to lamotrigine (LTG), 28% (n = 58) to oxcarbazepine (OXC), 15% (n = 32) to sodium valproate (VPA), 9% (n = 19) to levetiracetam, and 8% (n = 17) to carbamazepine, six ended in early abortion. The overall risk of early abortion in pregnant patients exposed to ASM monotherapy was 2.8% (n = 6) [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.013-0.073]. The risk of early abortion was 2.4% (n = 2) (95% CI = 0.003-0.082) in women treated with LTG, 3.5% (n = 2) (95% CI = 0.004-0.115) in women treated with OXC, and 6.3% (n = 2) (95% CI = 0.008-0.208) in women treated with VPA. The relative risk of early abortion in the LTG, OXC, and VPA groups did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions

Although the sample size of our study was small, these results indicate that the use of anti-seizure monotherapy in pregnant epilepsy patients may not increase the risk of early miscarriage. Larger prospective studies are needed for sufficient statistical analysis.

Changes in seizure frequency and anti-seizure medication therapy during pregnancy and one year postpregnancy

Seizure control in women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy is a vital concern. The aim of this study was to compare changes in seizure frequency and anti-seizure medication (ASM ) therapy in WWE in a real-world setting over three epochs (prepregnancy, pregnancy, and postpregnancy). We screened WWE who were pregnant between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020 from the epilepsy follow-up registry database of a tertiary hospital in China. We reviewed and collected follow-up data for the following time periods: 12 months before pregnancy (epoch 1), throughout pregnancy and the first 6 weeks postpartum (epoch 2), and from 6 weeks to 12 months postpartum (epoch 3). Seizures were classified into two categories: tonic‒clonic/focal to bilateral tonic‒clonic seizures and non-tonic‒clonic seizures. The main indicator was the seizure-free rate over the three epochs. Using epoch 1 as a reference, we also compared the percentage of women with an increased seizure frequency, as well as changes in ASM treatment, in epochs 2 and 3. Ultimately, 271 eligible pregnancies in 249 women were included. The seizure-free rates in epoch 1, epoch 2, and epoch 3 were 38.4%, 34.7%, and 43.9%, respectively (P = 0.09). The top three ASMs used in the three epochs were lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and oxcarbazepine. Using epoch 1 as a reference, the percentages of women with increased frequencies of tonic‒clonic/focal to bilateral tonic‒clonic seizures in epoch 2 and epoch 3 were 17.0% and 14.8%, respectively, while the percentages of women with an increased frequency of non-tonic‒clonic seizures in epoch 2 and epoch 3 were 31.0% and 21.8% (P = 0.02). The percentage of women whose ASM dosages were increased in epoch 2 was higher than that in epoch 3 (35.8% vs. 27.3%, P = 0.03). The seizure frequency during pregnancy may not differ significantly from that during prepregnancy and postpregnancy if WWE are treated according to the guidelines.

Managing reproductive problems in women with epilepsy of childbearing age

Girls and women constitute nearly 50% of all epilepsy cases. Apart from the disease symptoms, epilepsy and antiseizure medications (ASMs) may also affect the reproductive function, pregnancy and even the health of their offspring. Therefore, it is very important to identify and summarize the problems and risks for women with epilepsy (WWE) of childbearing age, and offer internationally recognized methods through multidisciplinary collaboration. In this review, we summarize the reproduction-related problems with WWE and propose multidisciplinary management by epileptologists, gynecologists and obstetricians, as well as other experts, from preconception to delivery. Large, multicenter registries are needed to advance our knowledge on new ASMs and their effects on WWE and their offspring.

Levetiracetam, lamotrigine and carbamazepine: which monotherapy during pregnancy?

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy treatment during pregnancy is still challenging. The study is aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG) and levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapies during pregnancy in women with focal (FE) or generalized (GE) epilepsy.

METHODS

A multicentre retrospective study was conducted to evaluate seizures frequency and seizure freedom (SF) rate during 3 months before pregnancy, each trimester of gestation and post-partum period in women on monotherapy with CBZ, LTG and LEV.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven pregnancies (45 FE, 12 GE) on monotherapy (29 CBZ, 11 LTG, 17 LEV) were included. A significant reduction of seizure frequency was found in the first trimester of pregnancy as compared with that one before pregnancy (p = 0.004), more evident in GE (p = 0.003) and in LEV group (p = 0.004). The SF rate significantly increased in the first trimester in comparison to that one before pregnancy and persisted in the post-partum period in the whole sample (p < 0.001) and in women on LEV (p = 0.004). Besides, 88.57% of SF women before pregnancy remained unchanged during gestation and the post-partum period. One major heart malformation in CBZ and no major malformations in LTG and LEV groups were found.

CONCLUSIONS

A better clinical outcome during pregnancy emerged since the first trimester in comparison to the before-pregnancy period, mostly evident in women with GE and LEV therapy, reinforcing the hypothesis of a protective role of pregnancy versus seizures. SF before pregnancy represents a significant predictive factor of good clinical outcome during gestation and the post-partum period. Compared to CBZ, LTG and LEV showed a better safety profile.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs in Women with Epilepsy Before, During, and After Pregnancy

During pregnancy, the pharmacokinetics of an antiepileptic drug is altered because of changes in the clearance capacity and volume of distribution. These changes may have consequences for the frequency of seizures during pregnancy and fetal exposure to antiepileptic drugs. In 2009, a review was published providing guidance for the dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy. Since that review, new drugs have been licensed and new information about existing drugs has been published. With this review, we aim to provide an updated narrative overview of changes in the pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs in women during pregnancy. In addition, we aim to formulate advice for dose modification and therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs. We searched PubMed and the available literature on the pharmacokinetic changes of antiepileptic drugs and seizure frequency during pregnancy published between January 2007 and September 2018. During pregnancy, an increase in clearance and a decrease in the concentrations of lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine's active metabolite licarbazepine, topiramate, and zonisamide were observed. Carbamazepine clearance remains unchanged during pregnancy. There is inadequate or no evidence for changes in the clearance or concentrations of clobazam and its active metabolite N-desmethylclobazam, gabapentin, lacosamide, perampanel, and valproate. Postpartum elimination rates of lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and licarbazepine resumed to pre-pregnancy values within the first few weeks after pregnancy. We advise monitoring of antiepileptic drug trough concentrations twice before pregnancy. This is the reference concentration. We also advise to consider dose adjustments guided by therapeutic drug monitoring during pregnancy if the antiepileptic drug concentration decreases 15-25% from the pre-pregnancy reference concentration, in the presence of risk factors for convulsions. If the antiepileptic drug concentration changes more than 25% compared with the reference concentration, dose adjustment is advised. Monitoring of levetiracetam, licarbazepine, lamotrigine, and topiramate is recommended during and after pregnancy. Monitoring of clobazam, N-desmethylclobazam, gabapentin, lacosamide, perampanel, and zonisamide during and after pregnancy should be considered. Because of the risk of teratogenic effects, valproate should be avoided during pregnancy. If that is impossible, monitoring of both total and unbound valproate is recommended. More research is needed on the large number of unclear pregnancy-related effects on the pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs.

Changes in Seizure Frequency and Antiepileptic Therapy during Pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Among women with epilepsy, studies regarding changes in seizure frequency during pregnancy have been limited by the lack of an appropriate nonpregnant comparator group to provide data on the natural course of seizure frequency in both groups.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study, we compared the frequency of seizures during pregnancy through the peripartum period (the first 6 weeks after birth) (epoch 1) with the frequency during the postpartum period (the following 7.5 months after pregnancy) (epoch 2). Nonpregnant women with epilepsy were enrolled as controls and had similar follow-up during an 18-month period. The primary outcome was the percentage of women who had a higher frequency of seizures that impaired awareness during epoch 1 than during epoch 2. We also compared changes in the doses of antiepileptic drugs that were administered in the two groups during the first 9 months of epoch 1.

RESULTS

We enrolled 351 pregnant women and 109 controls with epilepsy. Among the 299 pregnant women and 93 controls who had a history of seizures that impaired awareness and who had available data for the two epochs, seizure frequency was higher during epoch 1 than during epoch 2 in 70 pregnant women (23%) and in 23 controls (25%) (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 1.60). During pregnancy, the dose of an antiepileptic drug was changed at least once in 74% of pregnant women and in 31% of controls (odds ratio, 6.36; 95% CI, 3.82 to 10.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Among women with epilepsy, the percentage who had a higher incidence of seizures during pregnancy than during the postpartum period was similar to that in women who were not pregnant during the corresponding epochs. Changes in doses of antiepileptic drugs occurred more frequently in pregnant women than in nonpregnant women during similar time periods. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; MONEAD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01730170.).

Comparative study of antiepileptic drug use during pregnancy over a period of 12 years in Spain. Efficacy of the newer antiepileptic drugs lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and oxcarbazepine

INTRODUCTION

The prescription pattern of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during pregnancy is changing but to what extent this is occurring in Spain remains unknown. The efficacy of newer drugs for controlling seizures is a key issue and may have changed over the years as doctors gained familiarity with these drugs during pregnancy. To assess these 2 topics, we report the results from the Spanish EURAP register gathered over a 12-year period.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After signing informed consent forms, patients were included in the register and evaluated at onset of pregnancy, at the end of the second and third trimesters, after delivery, and one year after delivery. For the purposes of this study, we analysed AEDs, type of epilepsy, seizure frequency per trimester and throughout pregnancy, percentage of seizure-free pregnancies, and frequency of congenital malformations. We then compared data from 2 periods (June 2001-October 2007) and (January 2008-May 2015) RESULTS: We compared 304 monotherapies from the older period to 127 from the more recent one. There was a clear increase in the use of levetiracetam (LEV) with declining use of carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin, and phenobarbital; a slight decline in use of valproate (VPA), and a slight increase in the use of lamotrigine (LTG) and oxcarbazepine (OXC). Epilepsy types treated with CBZ and VPA remained unchanged, whereas fewer cases of generalised epilepsy were treated with LTG in the new period. This trend was not associated with significant changes in seizure frequency, but rather linked to better control over de novo seizures in the third trimester. LEV was similar to CBZ and VPA with regard to levels of seizure control, and more effective than LTG. Generalised epilepsy accounted for 64% of the cases treated with LEV.

CONCLUSIONS

The prescription pattern of AEDs during pregnancy has changed in Spain, with diminishing use of CBZ, phenytoin, and phenobarbital. Changes also reflect the type of epilepsy, since there is less use of LTG for generalised epilepsy. LEV provides similar seizure control to that of the older AEDs, and it is more effective and better than LTG.

Does pregnancy per se make epilepsy worse?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether being pregnant in its own right alters epileptic seizure control.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Study of 148 pregnancies in women who took no antiepileptic drugs before pregnancy and in at least the earlier half of pregnancy, 69 taking none throughout pregnancy.

RESULTS

More women (P < 0.01) had seizures of any type during pregnancy (45.9%) than in the prepregnancy year (34.5%), and also convulsive seizures (30.4% vs 12.3%). After excluding potential confounding factors, viz. late prepregnancy drug withdrawal, treatment resumption in pregnancy possibly preventing seizure recurrence, the figures became seizures of any type 56.6% during and 35.5% before pregnancy and convulsive seizures 39.4% during and 18.2% before pregnancy (both P < 0.01). There was a non-statistically significant greater tendency for seizure control to be lost during pregnancy in genetic generalized than in focal epilepsies (54.2% vs 35.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of its effects on antiepileptic drug disposition, being pregnant per se seems to impair epileptic seizure control.

MODEL-BASED LAMOTRIGINE CLEARANCE CHANGES DURING PREGNANCY: CLINICAL IMPLICATION

Objective

The objective of the study was to characterize changes in the oral clearance (CL/F) of lamotrigine (LTG) over the course of pregnancy and the postpartum period through a model-based approach incorporating clinical characteristics that may influence CL/F, in support of developing clinical management guidelines.

Methods

Women receiving LTG therapy who were pregnant or planning pregnancy were enrolled. Maternal blood samples were collected at each visit. A pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a population-based, nonlinear, mixed-effects model.

Results

A total of 600 LTG concentrations from 60 women (64 pregnancies) were included. The baseline LTG CL/F was 2.16 L/h with a between-subject variability of 40.6%. The influence of pregnancy on CL/F was described by gestational week. Two subpopulations of women emerged based on the rate of increase in LTG CL/F during pregnancy. The gestational age-associated increase in CL/F displayed a 10-fold higher rate in 77% of the women (0.118 L/h per week) compared to 23% (0.0115 L/h per week). The between-subject variability in these slopes was 43.0%. The increased CL/F at delivery declined to baseline values with a half-life of 0.55 weeks.

Interpretation

The majority of women had a substantial increase in CL/F from 2.16 to 6.88 L/h by the end of pregnancy, whereas 23% of women had a minimal increase. An increase in CL/F may correspond to decreases in LTG blood concentrations necessitating the need for more frequent dosage adjustments and closer monitoring in some pregnant women with epilepsy. Postpartum doses should be tapered to preconception dose ranges within 3 weeks of delivery.

Seizure control and treatment changes in pregnancy: observations from the EURAP epilepsy pregnancy registry

PURPOSE

To analyze seizure control, dose adjustments, and other changes of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment during pregnancy in a large cohort of women with epilepsy entering pregnancy on monotherapy with carbamazepine, lamotrigine, phenobarbital, or valproate.

METHODS

Seizure control and AED treatment were recorded prospectively in 3,806 pregnancies of 3,451 women with epilepsy taking part in European and International Registry of Antiepileptic Drugs and Pregnancy (EURAP), an international AED and pregnancy registry.

KEY FINDINGS

Of all cases, 66.6% remained seizure-free throughout pregnancy. Generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) occurred in 15.2% of the pregnancies. Women with idiopathic generalized epilepsies were more likely to remain seizure-free (73.6%) than women with localization-related epilepsy (59.5%; p < 0.0001). Worsening in seizure control from the first to second or third trimesters occurred in 15.8% of pregnancies. The AED dose was increased during pregnancy in 26.0% and a second AED added to the initial monotherapy in 2.6% of all pregnancies. Seizures were more likely to occur in the first trimester in pregnancies with an increased drug load (35%; increased dose and/or addition of another AED) than in pregnancies without an increased drug load (15.3%) (p < 0.0001). Compared with other monotherapies, pregnancies exposed to lamotrigine were less likely to be seizure-free, 58.2% (p < 0.0001); had more GTCS, 21.1% (p < 0.0001); had a greater likelihood of deterioration in seizure control from first to second or third trimesters, 19.9% (p < 0.01), and were more likely to require an increase in drug load, 47.7% (p < 0.0001). The mean dose increases from the first to third trimesters were 26% for lamotrigine, 5% for carbamazepine, 11% for phenobarbital, and 6% for valproate. There were 21 cases of status epilepticus (10 convulsive): none with maternal mortality and only one with a subsequent stillbirth.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although the majority of women remain seizure-free throughout pregnancy, our data suggest that a more proactive approach to adjusting the dose of all AEDs in pregnancy should be considered, in particular for those pregnancies with seizures occurring in the first trimester and those exposed to lamotrigine, to reduce the risk of deterioration in seizure control.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in pregnancy

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is commonly recommended to optimize drug dosing regimens of various medications. It has been proposed to guide therapy in pregnant women, in whom physiological changes may lead to altered pharmacokinetics resulting in difficulty in predicting the appropriate drug dosage. Ideally, TDM may play a role in enhancing the effectiveness of treatment while minimizing toxicity of both the mother and fetus. Monitoring of drug levels may also be helpful in assessing adherence to prescribed therapy in selected cases. Limitations exist as therapeutic ranges have only been defined for a limited number of drugs and are based on data obtained in nonpregnant patients. TDM has been suggested for anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and antiretroviral drugs, based on pharmacokinetic studies that have shown reduced drug concentrations. However, there is only relatively limited (and sometimes inconsistent) information regarding the clinical impact of these pharmacokinetic changes during pregnancy and the effect of subsequent dose adjustments. Further studies are required to determine whether implementation of TDM during pregnancy improves outcome and is associated with any benefit beyond that achieved by clinical judgment alone. The cost effectiveness of TDM programs during pregnancy also remains to be examined.

Algorithm for lamotrigine dose adjustment before, during, and after pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Treatment with lamotrigine (LTG) during pregnancy is associated with a pronounced risk of seizure deterioration, because pregnancy accelerates LTG elimination. The extent to which pregnancy affects LTG pharmacokinetics is unpredictable and varies considerably among patients.

AIM

We propose an algorithm for systematic LTG plasma concentration monitoring and dose adjustment to guide the clinician between the risk of seizure deterioration and LTG toxicity by maintaining a stable LTG concentration, using the optimal prepregnancy target concentration as a reference.

METHODS

The reference LTG plasma concentration (RC) should be determined before pregnancy or as early in pregnancy as possible. After conception, plasma concentration of LTG should be measured every 4 weeks throughout pregnancy. When the LTG plasma concentration falls below the RC, the dose of LTG should be increased by 20-25%. Post-partum, the plasma concentration of LTG should be measured within the first or second week, and if the LTG plasma concentration is higher than the RC, the LTG dose should be reduced by 20-25% and the procedure repeated until RC is re-established.

CONCLUSIONS

Seizure deterioration during pregnancy may be prevented or reduced by closely and systematically following our proposed algorithm.

Antiepileptic drugs in women with epilepsy during pregnancy

Prescribing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in pregnancy is a challenge to the clinician. A multitude of questions arise that must be addressed even prior to conception. In women with proven epilepsy, it may be dangerous to stop or even change the AED regimen during pregnancy. Changes could lead to injury or death in both the mother and the fetus. In the rare cases when discontinuing an AED is plausible, it should be done methodically in consultation with the physician prior to conception. Most women with epilepsy are consigned to continue their AEDs before, during and after pregnancy. The metabolism of AEDs may change drastically during pregnancy. These changes must be addressed by the clinician. Drug levels should be monitored consistently during pregnancy. The risks to the fetus must be delineated in terms of side effects from specific drugs as well as risks from the seizure disorder itself. Many AEDs have well known teratogenic effects, and these must be elucidated to the mother. There are risks (theoretical and evidence based) for obstetrical complications, poor neonatal outcomes, congenital malformations and even cognitive effects on the child later in life. These risks are addressed in this article with respect to individual AEDs. Recommendations include but are not limited to preconception counseling, taking folate pre and post conception, prescribing the most effective AED while minimizing risks, and avoiding polytherapy and valproate if possible.

Do lamotrigine and levetiracetam solve the problem of using sodium valproate in women with epilepsy?

Women with epilepsy, especially those of child-bearing age, are faced with difficult choices when it comes to choosing the most suitable antiepileptic drug (AED). This is particularly so for those with idiopathic generalized epilepsies, or those for whom seizure syndrome is not immediately apparent, where sodium valproate is still considered the drug of choice. While with treatment most might expect to become seizure free, without any adverse effects, other considerations for women mean that valproate is usually initially avoided, with other AEDs such as lamotrigine or levetiracetam being chosen in preference. Based on current information, this article attempts to provide an overview on whether or not the availability of these and other broad-spectrum AEDs have solved the difficulties of using valproate in women of child-bearing age.

Efficacy, safety, and potential of extended-release lamotrigine in the treatment of epileptic patients

Epilepsy is a frequent, chronic disease demanding long-term medication with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). When slow release formulations of AEDs are used the chance of compliance and control of seizures is increased. Lamotrigine (LTG) is a broad spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED), effective against both generalized and partial seizures. Its immediate-release formulation (LTG-IR) requires twice-daily dosing. In contrast, an extended-release formulation (LTG-XR) may be given once daily, providing a flatter dose-concentration curve with apparently lower maximum serum levels. Simplified dosing positively affects compliance and LTG-XR has a similar profile of efficacy and tolerability to LTG-IR. Rashes, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, are the most serious adverse effect impacting 0.8% of pediatric patients. Thus, LTG-XR should be discontinued upon the appearance of rash.