Demyelinating prenatal and infantile developmental neuropathies

Differential Diagnosis of Acquired and Hereditary Neuropathies in Children and Adolescents-Consensus-Based Practice Guidelines

Disorders of the peripheral nerves can be caused by a broad spectrum of acquired or hereditary aetiologies. The objective of these practice guidelines is to provide the reader with information about the differential diagnostic workup for a target-oriented diagnosis. Following an initiative of the German-speaking Society of Neuropaediatrics, delegates from 10 German societies dedicated to neuroscience worked in close co-operation to write this guideline. Applying the Delphi methodology, the authors carried out a formal consensus process to develop practice recommendations. These covered the important diagnostic steps both for acquired neuropathies (traumatic, infectious, inflammatory) and the spectrum of hereditary Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) diseases. Some of our most important recommendations are that: (i) The indication for further diagnostics must be based on the patient's history and clinical findings; (ii) Potential toxic neuropathy also has to be considered; (iii) For focal and regional neuropathies of unknown aetiology, nerve sonography and MRI should be performed; and (iv) For demyelinated hereditary neuropathy, genetic diagnostics should first address PMP22 gene deletion: once that has been excluded, massive parallel sequencing including an analysis of relevant CMT-genes should be performed. This article contains a short version of the guidelines. The full-length text (in German) can be found at the Website of the "Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e.V. (AWMF), Germany.

Infantile-Onset Myelin Protein Zero-Related Demyelinating Neuropathy Presenting as an Upper Extremity Monoplegia

We describe an infant with an early-onset demyelinating neuropathy who presented with an upper extremity monoplegia and progressive asymmetric weakness. Neurophysiologic testing revealed a generalized severe neuropathy with marked slowing of nerve conduction. The disproportionate severity and asymmetry of upper extremity involvement at presentation was atypical of inherited neuropathies, and an initial diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy was considered. Nerve biopsy showed severe depletion of large myelinated fibers without inflammatory cells, and focally folded myelin sheaths were seen on electron microscopy. Genetic testing revealed a de novo heterozygous mutation in the myelin protein zero gene.

Dejerine-Sottas disease in childhood-Genetic and sonographic heterogeneity

INTRODUCTION

The nerve sonographic features of Dejerine-Sottas disease (DSD) have not previously been described.

METHODS

This exploratory cross-sectional, matched, case-control study investigated differences in nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) in children with DSD compared to healthy controls and children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A). CSA of the median, ulnar, tibial, and sural nerves was measured by peripheral nerve ultrasound. The mean difference in CSA between children with DSD, controls, and CMT1A was determined individually and within each group.

RESULTS

Five children with DSD and five age- and sex-matched controls were enrolled. Data from five age-matched children with CMT1A was also included. Group comparison showed no mean difference in nerve CSA between children with DSD and controls. Individual analysis of each DSD patient with their matched control indicated an increase in nerve CSA in three of the five children. The largest increase was observed in a child with a heterozygous PMP22 point mutation (nerve CSA fivefold larger than a control and twofold larger than a child with CMT1A). Nerve CSA was moderately increased in two children-one with a heterozygous mutation in MPZ and the other of unknown genetic etiology.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in nerve CSA on ultrasonography in children with DSD differ according to the underlying genetic etiology, confirming the variation in underlying pathobiologic processes and downstream morphological abnormalities of DSD subtypes. Nerve ultrasound may assist in the clinical phenotyping of DSD and act as an adjunct to known distinctive clinical and neurophysiologic findings of DSD subtypes. Larger studies in DSD cohorts are required to confirm these findings.

[Guillain-Barré syndrome in infancy: The importance of electroneuromyography]

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is rare in infancy, and the diagnosis of atypical forms is difficult in this age range. The main differential diagnoses include congenital neuropathy. Biological and electrophysiological investigations remain important to confirm diagnosis and start treatment quickly. We report the case of an 8-month-old boy who presented with acquired hypotonia due to progressive descending limb paralysis, predominant in the upper limbs, associated with unexplained severe neutropenia. GBS was diagnosed thanks to the association of albuminocytologic dissociation on cerebrospinal fluid and demyelinating sensomotor polyradiculoneuropathy on electroneuromyography. Only one cycle of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins was sufficient to achieve complete recovery after 1 year. Physicians should know that atypical forms of GBS exist in infants, in order to recognize the syndrome, rule out differential diagnoses, and start treatment as soon as possible. Medical follow-up remains important before and after remission, especially in infants, to identify relapses, which might be the symptom of a genetic neuropathy or a chronic inflammatory disease.

Etiologic spectrum of biopsy-proven peripheral neuropathies in childhood from a resource-poor setting

There are only a few studies describing the etiologic spectrum of biopsy-proven peripheral neuropathies in children. This study reviewed the clinical, electrophysiological, and pathologic profile of 239 children (≤18 years of age) who have undergone nerve biopsy in a tertiary care centre for neurologic disorders and analyzed the etiologic spectrum and utility of nerve biopsy. The clinical profile, neuropathologic findings, and other investigations were combined to infer the final diagnosis. Neuropathy was detected in 199 biopsies; axonal pathology in 43%; demyelination in 41%; mixed pattern in 8%; and nonspecific findings in 8%. The major diagnostic categories included hereditary neuropathies (48%), heredodegenerative and metabolic disorders (27%), and inflammatory neuropathies (12%). Nerve biopsy proved most helpful in diagnosis of demyelinating and inflammatory neuropathies, reiterating its usefulness in specific situations.

Diagnosis and management of pediatric peripheral neuropathies in resource-poor settings

The diagnosis of a peripheral neuropathy in a child who resides in the majority of resource-poor settings is based on the history taken and the clinical examination. The majority of children, unless they demonstrate additional clinical markers, will lack a more definitive diagnosis beyond the label ‘peripheral neuropathy’. The treatable, typically acquired conditions, which are prevalent in these settings, are the priority to identify. This would include neuroinfections, neuroinflammation, toxins and vitamin deficiencies. The management of children with peripheral neuropathies in resource-poor settings must be approached in a different manner to that of more ‘resource-equipped’ settings. Secondary or tertiary centers are scarce, often significant distances away from the patient, and this leads to long delays before access is possible. Most children present to primary healthcare settings and are seen by practitioners with little training in the features suggestive of a peripheral neuropathy. As such, basic aids to assist the healthcare worker in the early recognition and interventions of a child with a peripheral neuropathy are important. In addition, there must be recognition of the child with a rapidly progressive neuropathy where a life-threatening condition is present, and urgent referral to a tertiary setting made wherever possible.