Bromocriptine in the treatment of alcohol dependence

Efficacy of pharmacotherapeutics for patients comorbid with alcohol use disorders and depressive symptoms-A bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

We aimed to compare and rank the efficacy of different pharmacotherapeutics for patients comorbid with alcohol use disorders and depressive symptoms.

Method

Bayesian network meta‐analysis was performed for three different outcome parameters: alcohol use disorders (AUD) remission rate, percent abstinent days, and scores of depression scales. The surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) was used for ranking the efficacy of interventions. Sensitivity analysis and direct pairwise analysis were conducted to validate the main results.

Results

A total of 68 RCTs consisting of 5890 patients were included. Disulfiram could significantly increase the AUD remission rates (OR 5.02, 1.97‐12.95) and the percent abstinent days (MD 17.08, 3.48‐30.93). Disulfiram was associated with the best efficacy in achieving remission (SUCRA 95.1%) and increasing abstinent days (SUCRA 87.6%). Noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor was significantly more efficacious than controls (SMD −2.44, −3.53 to −1.36) and have the first rank (SUCRA 99.0%) in reducing the scores of depression scales. Antiepileptics have relatively higher ranks in efficacy for both AUD and depressive symptoms.

Conclusions

Disulfiram was associated with the best efficacy in achieving abstinence for comorbidity patients. Noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor was demonstrated to be associated with the best efficacy in reducing scores of depression scales. Antiepileptics might be beneficial to both alcohol‐related and depressive symptoms.

Advancing Pharmacotherapy Development from Preclinical Animal Studies

Animal models provide rapid, inexpensive assessments of an investigational drug's therapeutic potential. Ideally, they support the plausibility of therapeutic efficacy and provide a rationale for further investigation. Here, I discuss how the absence of clear effective-ineffective categories for alcohol use disorder (AUD) medications and biases in the clinical and preclinical literature affect the development of predictive preclinical alcohol dependence (AD) models. Invoking the analogical argument concept from the philosophy of science field, I discuss how models of excessive alcohol drinking support the plausibility of clinical pharmacotherapy effects. Even though these models are not likely be completely discriminative, they are sensitive to clinically effective medications and have revealed dozens of novel medication targets. In that context, I discuss recent preclinical work on GLP-1 receptor agonists, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, glucocorticoid receptor antagonists, nociception agonists and antagonists, and CRF1 antagonists. Clinically approved medications are available for each of these drug classes. I conclude by advocating a translational approach in which drugs are evaluated highly congruent preclinical models and human laboratory studies. Once translation is established, I suggest the burden is to develop hypothesis-based therapeutic interventions maximizing the impact of the confirmed pharmacotherapeutic effects in the context of additional variables falling outside the model.

Aripiprazole in the treatment of patients with alcohol dependence: a double-blind, comparison trial vs. naltrexone

Substantial evidence suggests that both partial dopamine agents and mixed 5-HT1A/2A receptor drugs independently show significant efficacy in reducing alcohol use in both animals and humans. Aripiprazole, which acts as a dopamine/5-HT system stabilizer, approaches the optimal characteristics sought in medication to be considered for testing in the treatment of alcohol dependence. In this randomised, double-blind, confrontation trial with naltrexone, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of aripiprazole on alcohol-drinking indices. Craving and psychiatric symptom improvements were the secondary end points. Seventy-five alcohol dependent subjects were detoxified and were subsequently randomised into two groups, receiving 50 mg of naltrexone and 5-15 mg of aripiprazole, respectively. Craving (Visual Analogue Scale; Obsessive and Compulsive Drinking Scale) and withdrawal (Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment) rating scales were applied; psychiatric symptoms were evaluated through the Symptom Check List 90-Revised. The number of subjects remained alcohol free for the entire study period (16 weeks) and the number of subjects relapsed were not significantly different in the two groups. The survival function showed that patients treated with aripiprazole remained abstinent from any alcohol amount for a longer time with respect to those treated with naltrexone. As for craving scores, patients treated with naltrexone showed a better outcome. Results from this study globally place aripiprazole at the same range of efficacy of naltrexone, one of the approved drugs used in alcohol relapse prevention. If it could be demonstrated in placebo-controlled trials that aripiprazole is efficacious in decreasing alcohol use, lessening craving, and attenuating psychopathological symptom severity, we will have gained a powerful agent for the treatment of alcohol-dependent subjects.

Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in alcohol dependence

Dopaminergic agonists and antagonists have both been examined for the treatment of substance abuse with contrasting results. To the best of our knowledge dopamine receptor partial agonists have not been investigated in alcohol use disorders. Thirteen detoxified alcohol-dependent subjects were treated with flexible doses of aripiprazole for 16 weeks. Six patients maintained an alcohol free condition for all the study period. All the subjects experienced a reduction of craving in both OCDS (p < .05) and VAS (p < .05), and a decrease of the SCL-90 General Severity Index (GSI) (p < .05). The data of this pilot clinical study, suggest a possible role for this drug in the treatment of individuals with alcohol problems.

Update on neuropharmacological treatments for alcoholism: scientific basis and clinical findings

The past decade has seen an expansion of research and knowledge on pharmacotherapy for the treatment of alcohol dependence. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications naltrexone and acamprosate have shown mixed results in clinical trials. Oral naltrexone and naltrexone depot formulations have generally demonstrated efficacy at treating alcohol dependence, but their treatment effect size is small, and more research is needed to compare the effects of different doses on drinking outcome. Acamprosate has demonstrated efficacy for treating alcohol dependence in European trials, but with a small effect size. In U.S. trials, acamprosate has not proved to be efficacious. Research continues to explore which types of alcohol-dependent individual would benefit the most from treatment with naltrexone or acamprosate. The combination of the two medications demonstrated efficacy for treating alcohol dependence in one European study but not in a multi-site U.S. study. Another FDA-approved medication, disulfiram, is an aversive agent that does not diminish craving for alcohol. Disulfiram is most effective when given to those who are highly compliant or who are receiving their medication under supervision. Of the non-approved medications, topiramate is among the most promising, with a medium effect size in clinical trials. Another promising medication, baclofen, has shown efficacy in small trials. Serotonergic agents such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the serotonin-3 receptor antagonist, ondansetron, appear to be efficacious only among certain genetic subtypes of alcoholic. As neuroscientific research progresses, other promising medications, as well as medication combinations, for treating alcohol dependence continue to be explored.

Dopamine and alcoholism: neurobiological basis of ethanol abuse

The role of the dopamine (DA) system in brain reward mechanisms and the development of substance abuse has been well established. We review earlier animal and human studies on DA and alcoholism with some relevant issues relating to those studies. The present animal and human data suggest several alterations in the DA system in the context of alcoholism. Receptor studies imply that DA D(2) receptor density and function are lower at least among type 1 alcoholics, which suggests that they could benefit from drugs that enhance DAergic activity, such as partial DA agonists. These drugs could help to restore suboptimal levels of DAergic activity by reducing both the craving for alcohol in abstinence and the euphoria subsequent to alcohol's release of DA in the nucleus accumbens (NAC), thus providing negative reinforcement for relapse.

Alcoholism and the dopaminergic system: a review

Alcohol as well as other substances of abuse are reinforcing substances which manifest their effects through activation of the mesolimbic dopaminergic reward pathways of the brain. In animal genetic models of alcoholism, reduced dopamine levels and D2 dopamine receptor (DRD2) numbers have been found in the brains of alcohol-preferring animals. Dopamine receptor agonists reduce alcohol consumption, whereas antagonists, in general, show the opposite effect. Moreover, quantitative trait loci studies in animals suggest the DRD2 gene and the region proximate to this locus is a chromosomal "hot spot" for alcohol-related behaviors. Human studies provide additional support for connection between alcohol dependence and CNS dopaminergic function. In endocrinological studies, using dopamine receptor agonists, reduced dopaminergic activity has been found in more severe and more genetic types of alcoholics. Brain imaging studies are similarly revealing a diminished dopaminergic tone in alcoholics. Treatment of alcoholics with dopamine receptor agonists shows reduced alcohol consumption and improvements in other outcome measures. Molecular genetic studies in humans have identified an association of the Al allele of the DRD2 gene with alcoholism. Moreover, a diminished central dopaminergic function has been found in DRD2 A1 allele subjects using pharmacological, electrophysiological and neuropsychological studies. Further, treatment of alcoholics with a dopamine receptor agonist showed more salutary effects on alcoholics who carry than those who do not carry the DRD2 A1 allele. The A1 allele has also been associated with substance use disorders other than alcoholism, including and cocaine and nicotine dependence and polysubstance abuse. The emerging evidence suggests that the DRD2 is a reinforcement or reward gene. It could represent one of the most prominent single-gene determinants of susceptibility to severe substance abuse. However, the environment and other genes, when combined, still play the larger role.

The potential of dopamine agonists in drug addiction

The use of dopamine agonists in alcohol, stimulant and nicotine dependence has been examined. The direct agonists, such as bromocriptine and pergolide, have not shown utility in alcohol or cocaine abuse and dependence in larger controlled trials. Indirect agents, such as selegiline, may be helpful in cocaine or nicotine abuse and larger clinical trials are underway. Disulfiram may also raise dopamine levels and has shown promise for cocaine dependence. Other indirect agents, such as mazindol and methylphenidate, have not proven effective for cocaine addiction but have not been tested in alcohol or nicotine abuse. Agents for subtypes of dopamine receptors, such as D3, and the use of partial agonists may be useful future treatment approaches. Animal studies also suggest that tailoring treatment to subgroups of patients based on genotype may improve responses.

Lisuride, a dopamine D2 receptor agonist, and anticraving drug expectancy as modifiers of relapse in alcohol dependence

Due to a central role of dopamine in mediating ethanol intake and dependence, the authors tested lisuride, a dopamine D2 receptor agonist, for relapse prevention in alcoholics. Psychological and neuroendocrine determinants of outcome were also assessed within the study. This double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study comprised 120 alcoholics who were subjected to an intend-to-treat analysis (ITT). After hospital detoxification, patients received an outpatient rehabilitation program and either the study medication or placebo for 6 months and follow-up for another 6 months without medication. Pharmacological and psychological effects on relapse and times to first drink were assessed using survival analysis and multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA). Neuroendocrine assessments were made using growth hormone (GH) response to stimulation with dopamine D2 receptor agonist apomorphine. In contrast to our hypothesis, the pharmacological effects of lisuride shortened (effect size: 0.51) and the expectation of receiving the drug (while being on medication) prolonged the latency of relapse (effect size: 0.47) in weaned alcoholics. Lisuride was associated with side effects like dizziness and hypotension. Dopaminergic responsivity to apomorphine stimulation was reduced under lisuride. This study supports the view that alcoholics may relapse due to decreased dopamine function, resulting from intake of dopamine D2 receptor agonists. In particular, our data do not support the use of lisuride for relapse prevention in alcoholics. The favorable impact of anticraving drug expectancy on outcome was unrelated to this effect.

The role of biomarkers in alcoholism medication trials

BACKGROUND

Increasingly, biomarkers are being incorporated into the research design of clinical trials on medications to reduce drinking in alcoholics. To date, however, there has been little analysis of the unique roles that biomarkers can play in such investigations or of the practical and conceptual considerations that surround their best use in this context.

METHODS

Clinical trials of alcoholism medications published between 1985 and the present were abstracted to determine how biomarkers were used and how changes in them related to self-report measures of drinking.

RESULTS

Six uses of biomarkers were identified: determination of subjects to be included or excluded in the trial; description of baseline sample characteristics; primary and secondary outcome assessment; corroboration of self-reports of drinking status; specification of patients likely to respond to the medication; and evaluation of drug safety.

CONCLUSION

Use of biomarkers in such studies appears warranted, particularly as an objective source of information on treatment efficacy that can be considered with patient self-report measures of drinking status. Biomarkers related to liver functioning also can assist in determination of drug safety for medications metabolized by the liver.

Diagnosis, self-help, and maintenance care as key constructs in treatment research for "alcohol use disorders" (AUD)

OBJECTIVE

This study examines a sample of alcohol user treatment outcome studies to determine the amount of attention given to three areas of concern and cost-effectiveness in treatment research: patient diagnosis, use of self-help groups (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous [AA]), and use of maintenance care services (also known as a "aftercare").

METHOD

A preliminary sample of 40 studies was coded for the degree of specific information provided to each of the three areas of interest.

RESULTS

Eight studies in the sample did not mention the diagnostic criteria used to determine patient addiction, 18 did not mention use, referral, or recommendation of AA, and 20 did not mention use, referral, or recommendation of maintenance care services.

CONCLUSIONS

As cost-effective additions to primary treatment, AA and maintenance care services deserve greater attention in the treatment of "substance abuse disorders." Researchers should also pay greater attention to patient diagnosis as an integral part of patient care. Finally, journal editors should institute minimum requirements for published reports ensuring that sufficient information on patient care is provided.

Dopamine and alcohol relapse: D1 and D2 antagonists increase relapse rates in animal studies and in clinical trials

A considerable number of animal studies on the effects of dopaminergic agents on alcohol intake behavior have been performed. Acute alcohol administration in rats induces dopamine release in the caudate nucleus and in the nucleus accumbens, an effect related among others to reinforcement. It has been repeatedly suggested that D1 and D2 receptor activation mediates reward. As alcohol consumption and dopaminergic transmission seem to have a close relationship, all kinds of dopaminergic agents may be regarded as putative therapeutics for preventing relapse. In a prospective European double-blind multicenter clinical trial, comparing the D1, D2, D3 antagonist flupenthixol and placebo in 281 chronic alcohol-dependent patients (27.4% women), the application of the Lesch typology made an outcome differentiation possible. It could be shown in which patients flupenthixol administration was followed by a significantly higher relapse rate and in which patient groups no differences were found when compared to placebo.

Pharmacological treatment of alcoholism

1. Pharmacological treatments are effective as part of a treatment plan that includes substantial education, psychological therapy and social support. This paper reviews recent literature on animal models of and treatment for alcohol abuse under seven categories: agents to block craving or reduce alcohol intake, agents to induce aversion to alcohol, agents to treat acute alcohol withdrawal, agents to treat protracted alcohol withdrawal, agents to diminish drinking by treating associated psychiatric pathology, agents to decrease drinking by treating associated drug abuse, and agents to induce sobriety in intoxicated individuals. 2. The benzodiazepines provide safe and effective treatment for detoxification, although current research focuses on finding drugs with a smaller likelihood of dependence. As yet, there are no drugs that effectively reverse the intoxicating effects of alcohol. 3. Currently, only two major groups of drugs that are relatively safe have shown any effect at reducing alcohol consumption: aversives such as disulfiram, and opioid antagonists such as naltrexone. 4. Finally, it is important to customize therapy for each patient rather than putting everyone through a standard treatment plan, especially in regards to the use of antidepressant or antipsychotic medications. Tailoring the program to the patient's needs dramatically improves the outcome of therapy and reduces the risk of adverse effects.

Efficacy of buspirone in alcohol dependence: a review

The five published controlled studies on the effects of buspirone in alcoholism treatment are reviewed. They have been conducted mostly in alcoholics with comorbid anxiety. Significant differences in favor of the medication were observed in several psychopathological measures (anxiety, depression, hostility, interpersonal sensitivity, and global psychopathology). In only two studies were alcohol craving and consumption found influenced. Metaanalysis showed positive effects of buspirone on treatment retention, as well as on anxiety. It can be concluded that the main effect of buspirone in the treatment of alcoholism is not on ethanol consumption per se, but on associated psychopathological symptoms. A favorable safety profile and a lack of interaction with alcohol make buspirone a useful pharmacological adjunct in the treatment of alcoholism.

Pharmacotherapies for alcohol problems: a review of research with focus on developments since 1991

Research on medications to treat alcohol problems has flourished in the last 5 years. Whereas before this time most projects focused on withdrawal agents, at least equal interest has now extended to drugs that may directly reduce urge to drink. The most promising medications in this regard are the opiate antagonists and acamprosate. Considerable attention has also been devoted to serotonergic agents. As aids to detoxification, pharmacologic agents that affect the multiple neural systems disrupted by acute alcohol withdrawal remain under active investigation. Significant progress is also being made in identifying medications to assist alcoholics suffering collateral psychopathology, especially depression and anxiety based disorders. Unfortunately, fewer gains have been realized in the development of medications to assist patients simultaneously dependent on both alcohol and illicit drugs. Also, research to develop amethystic agents remains in its very early stages.

Buspirone in the treatment of alcohol dependence: a placebo-controlled trial

A double-blind controlled study of the effects of buspirone on alcohol dependence and associated symptoms in ambulatory alcoholics showed a marked improvement in both treatment and control groups. However, significant differences in favor of the medication were observed in several psychopathological measures, but not in measures of alcohol consumption. Contrary to a majority of prior controlled trials of buspirone in alcoholics, subjects were not selected on the basis of comorbid generalized anxiety; rather, the study tested the hypothesis of a direct effect on craving and consumption, independent from an anxiolytic effect. This hypothesis was not confirmed.

The treatment of alcoholism in France

Despite a recent decline in per capita alcohol consumption, alcoholism remains a serious public health problem in France. Pharmacotherapy is used to make withdrawal from alcohol easier and to help maintain abstinence. The recent development of effective pharmacologic treatments for alcoholism has increased interest in this approach to therapy. To determine the most appropriate form of pharmacotherapy for treating alcohol dependence, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies published between 1960 and 1993 was performed. We found that several pharmacotherapeutic agents had demonstrated safety and efficacy on different periods of follow-up, including acamprosate (long term), naltrexone (intermediate term), fluoxetine and citalopram (short term). Studies of zimeldine, nialamide, L-dopa, viloxazine, and tetrabamate failed to demonstrate efficacy for these agents in the treatment of alcoholism. Results were ambiguous or mixed for lithium, phenytoin, bromocriptine, apomorphine, and buspirone. Continued research is needed to identify the most appropriate patients to receive treatment with specific forms of pharmacotherapy.

Effects of cerebral electrical stimulation on alcoholism: a pilot study

Cerebral electrical stimulation (CES), born from research on electroanesthesia in the seventies, consists of the application of a pulsating current of small intensity (usually less than 1 mA, and below the threshold of perception) through the skull, e.g., in daily 30-min sessions. Claims of biological effectiveness (neurochemical, hormonal and EEG changes, naloxone-reversible analgesia in rats, etc.) and of clinical effectiveness (anxiety, depression, cognitive functions in alcoholics) have often relied on poorly controlled data. A recent controlled study in the treatment of opiate withdrawal has been positive. The present double-blind controlled study compares active CES with sham stimulation in 64 alcohol-dependent males. Over 4 weeks, both treatment groups improved significantly in most aspects. In the active treatment group additional significant improvement was observed in week-end alcohol consumption, and in two psychological measures: depression and stress symptoms index, but not in general drinking behavior.

Bromocriptine in the treatment of alcoholics with the D2 dopamine receptor A1 allele

Various types of alcoholics have been described and heredity has been shown to be involved in some of these types. An important role of the mesolimbic dopamine system has been suggested in the reinforcing effects of alcohol and recent molecular genetic studies are implicating the gene for the D2 dopamine receptor (DRD2) in alcoholism. In a double-blind study, bromocriptine, a DRD2 agonist, or placebo was administered to alcoholics with either the A1 (A1/A1 and A1/A2 genotypes) or only the A2 (A2/A2 genotype) allele of the DRD2 gene. The greatest improvement in craving and anxiety occurred in the bromocriptine-treated A1 alcoholics and attrition was highest in the placebo-treated A1 alcoholics. The feasibility of a pharmacogenetic approach in treating certain types of alcoholics is suggested.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of nortriptyline and bromocriptine in male alcoholics subtyped by comorbid psychiatric disorders

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-month follow-up treatment study investigated the efficacy of bromocriptine and nortriptyline in attenuating drinking behavior and psychiatric symptoms in 216 male alcoholic patients subtyped by comorbid psychiatric disorder(s). Three well-defined subtypes were examined: alcoholism only, alcoholism + affective/anxiety disorder, and alcoholism + antisocial personality disorder. It was hypothesized that both medications would relieve negative affective symptoms associated with alcohol use and would be particularly effective for the affective/anxiety subgroup. Contrary to our predictions, the only significant effects found were with the antisocial personality disorder patients who were receiving nortriptyline. One interpretation of the results was that nortriptyline may have reduced impulsive drinking in the antisocial personality disorder subgroup by actions on serotonergic neurotransmission.

Effects of the dopamine-related drug bromocriptine on event-related potentials and its relation to the law of initial value

Effects of the dopamine-related drug bromocriptine (BCT) on event-related potentials (ERP) were investigated in 18 healthy volunteers. Bromocriptine 2.5 mg or an inactive placebo was administered according to a completely randomized double-blind, cross-over design. The ERP were recorded 3 h after medication was given. Although BCT prolonged the P300 latency, it had no effect on the amplitudes of the ERP components as a whole. Bromocriptine increased the latencies of N100, P200 and P300 in the respective short-latency subject group, and decreased the latency of N200 in the long-latency subject group. It increased the amplitude of N200 in the low-amplitude subject group. It was concluded that the prolongation of P300 latency as a whole and the different responses that take place are dependent on the initial values and were recognized in the effect of a single administration of BCT 2.5 mg. The results of this study are discussed in relation to the law of initial value.

Reducing the desire to drink. Pharmacology and neurobiology

The past decade has witnessed major advances in understanding of neural functioning and neurobiological bases of alcohol consumption. Concurrent with this, a range of exciting investigations have been conducted on pharmacologic agents that may curb drinking behavior. Research is reviewed on several promising medications influencing neurotransmitter and endocrine systems with particular attention to the serotonergic and opioid systems. Following this overview, recommendations are offered regarding research methodology to support future pharmacotherapy trials.