Tailored prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A: interim results from the first 5 years of the Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis Study

Impact of Replacement Therapy on Pregnancy Outcomes in Hemophilia Carriers: A Historical Cohort Study in Saudi Arabia

This retrospective cohort study evaluates the safety and efficacy of replacement therapy with regard to pregnancy outcomes in hemophilia carriers. Hemophilia carriers face elevated bleeding risks during pregnancy, necessitating meticulous management, including replacement therapy with clotting factors. This research examines the records of 64 pregnant hemophilia carriers at King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, from January 2010 to December 2023, analyzing their demographic details, hemophilia type and severity, replacement therapy specifics, and pregnancy outcomes. The study found that 62.5% of the participants had hemophilia A, with 43.8% categorized as severe. Most subjects (87.5%) received recombinant factor VIII at a median dosage of 30 IU/kg weekly. Adverse pregnancy outcomes included gestational hypertension (15.6%), preterm labor (18.8%), and postpartum hemorrhage (12.5%). The cesarean section rate was 28.1%. Neonatal outcomes were generally favorable, with median birth weights at 3100 g and mean Apgar scores of 8.2 and 9.1 at 1 and 5 min, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed no significant association between adverse events and therapy type or dosage, though a trend towards significance was noted with once-weekly administration (p = 0.082). The study concludes that replacement therapy is a viable method for managing hemophilia in pregnant carriers, leading to generally favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, it underscores the importance of individualized treatment plans and close monitoring to effectively manage the risks associated with hemophilia during pregnancy.

Clot formation and fibrinolysis assays reveal functional differences among hemostatic agents in hemophilia A plasma

Background

Measuring the activity of hemostatic agents used to treat hemophilia A often requires drug-specific assays. In vitro assays show hemophilic clots have abnormal characteristics, including prolonged clotting time and decreased resistance to fibrinolysis. The ability of certain agents to correct these parameters in vitro is associated with hemostatic efficacy in vivo.

Objectives

To compare effects of established and emerging hemostatic agents on clot formation and fibrinolysis in hemophilia A plasma.

Methods

Pooled and individual hemophilia A platelet-poor plasmas were spiked with replacement (recombinant factor VIII [rFVIII], PEGylated rFVIII, polysialylated rFVIII, and porcine rFVIII) or bypassing (emicizumab, rFVIIa, and activated prothrombin complex concentrate) products. Effects on tissue factor-initiated clot formation and fibrinolysis were measured by turbidity.

Results

Compared to normal pooled plasma, hemophilia-pooled plasma showed reduced clot formation and increased fibrinolysis, and all replacement agents improved these characteristics. rFVIII and PEGylated rFVIII produced similar effects at similar concentrations, whereas polysialylated rFVIII produced slightly higher and porcine rFVIII slightly lower effects at these concentrations. Bypassing agents enhanced clot formation and stability, but patterns differed from replacement agents. The clotting rate showed a concentration-response relationship for all agents. High concentrations of all products produced effects that exceeded the normal range in at least some parameters. Responses of individual donors varied, but all agents improved clot formation and stability in all donors tested.

Conclusion

Clotting and fibrinolysis assays reveal hemostatic effects of replacement and bypassing therapies at clinically relevant concentrations. These assays may help characterize hemostatic agents and optimize dosing.

Machine learning model for predicting physical activity related bleeding risk in Chinese boys with haemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Physical activity is a crucial part of an active lifestyle for haemophiliac children. However, the fear of bleeds has been identified as barriers to participating physical activity for haemophiliac children even with prophylaxis. Lack of evidence and metrics driven by data is key problem.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to develop machine learning models based on clinical data with multiple potential factors considered to predict risk of physical activity bleeding for haemophilia children with prophylaxis.

METHODS

From this cohort study, we collected information on 98 haemophiliac children with adequate prophylaxis (trough FVIII:C level > 1 %). The involved potential predictor variables include demographic information, treatment information, physical activity, joint evaluation, and pharmacokinetic parameters, etc. We applied CoxPH, Random Survival Forests (RSF) and DeepSurv to construct prediction models for the risk of bleeding during physical activities. All three survival analysis models were internally and externally validated.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients were enrolled in this study. Their median age was 7.9 (5.5, 10.2) years. The CoxPH, RSF and DeepSurv models' discriminative and calibration abilities were all high, and the RSF model had the best performance (Internal validation: C-index, 0.7648 ± 0.0139; Brier Score, 0.1098 ± 0.0015; External validation: C-index, 0.7260 ± 0.0154; Brier Score, 0.0930 ± 0.0018). The prediction curves demonstrated that the developed RSF model can distinguish the risks well between bleeding and non-bleeding patients, as well as patients with different levels of physical activity. Meanwhile, the feature importance analysis confirmed that physical activity bleeding was deduced by comprehensive effects of various factors, and the importance of different factors on bleeding outcome is discrepant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed from the mechanism that it is necessary to incorporate multiple factors to accurately predict physical activity related bleeding risk. In clinical practice, the designed machine learning models can provide guidance for children with haemophilia A to positively participate in physical activity.

Primary prophylaxis in children with severe haemophilia A and B-Implementation over the last 20 years as illustrated in real-world data in the PedNet cohorts

INTRODUCTION

The prophylactic regimen in children with severe haemophilia is suggested in various publications and guidelines. Few data exist on its implementation in clinical practice.

AIM

To investigate the implementation of primary prophylaxis based on real-life data from PedNet during the last 20 years.

METHODS

All children from the PedNet cohort (n = 1260) with severe haemophilia A (SHA) or severe haemophilia B (SHB), FVIII/IX < .01 IU/mL, born between 2000 and 2009 (Cohort I; SHA n = 662; SHB n = 88) and 2010-2019 (Cohort II; SHA n = 598; SHB n = 94) were included.

RESULTS

In SHA, the median age at start of prophylaxis was 17.3 months (IQR; 12.5-26.1) in Cohort I which decreased to 13.1 months (IQR; 10.4-19.1) in Cohort II (p < .000). "Once-a-week" prophylaxis at start increased from 49% to 68% (SHA) and 38% to 70% (SHB). FVIII doses were reduced from median 43.5 (IQR; 34.6-49.0) to 30.9 IU/kg (IQR; 26.3-46.3), while dosing with FIX did not change. After 2010 approximately 60% of the patients with SHA and SHB started prophylaxis before any joint bleed. The number of CVADs needed in both cohorts was around 30%. Incidences of inhibitors were unchanged: SHA (∼31%) and SHB (∼10%). Sporadic cases were diagnosed significantly later (median 8.3 months; IQR; 3.7-11.9) and they had more joint bleeds before start of prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Primary prophylaxis nowadays starts at an earlier age: before any joint bleed (60% of patients with SHA and SHB). Approximately 70% started on a once-weekly schedule with significantly reduced doses in SHA but unchanged in SHB.

Haemophilia A: A Review of Clinical Manifestations, Treatment, Mutations, and the Development of Inhibitors

The purpose of this narrative review was to provide an overview that allows readers to improve their understanding of hemophilia A, which is considered a genetic disease with a high impact on the quality of life of people who suffer from it is considered one of the diseases with the highest cost for health systems (In Colombia it is part of the five diseases with the greatest economic impact). After this exhaustive review, we can see that the treatment of hemophilia is on the way to precision medicine, which involves genetic variables specific to each race and ethnicity, pharmacokinetics (PK), as well as environmental factors and lifestyle. Knowing the impact of each of these variables and their relationship with the efficacy of treatment (prophylaxis: regular infusion of the missing clotting factor VIII in order to prevent spontaneous bleeding) will allow for individualizing the medical behavior in a cost-effective way. For this is required to build more strong scientific evidence with statistical power that allows us to infer.

A Novel Deletion Mutation of the F8 Gene for Hemophilia A

Background: Hemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked recessive blood coagulation disorder caused by a variety of abnormalities in F8 gene, resulting in the absence of impaired molecule production of factor VIII (FVIII) in the plasma. The genetic testing of the F8 gene encoding FVIII is used for confirmation of HA diagnosis, which significantly reduced serious complications of this disease and, ultimately, increased life expectancy. Methods: Sanger sequencing was performed in F8 gene exons of the suspected patients with blood coagulation-related indicators. Results: A novel F8 indel variant c.6343delC, p.Leu2115SerfsTer28 in exon 22 of the F8 gene was identified in the suspected families. The infant with this novel variant appeared the symptom of minor bleeding and oral cavity bleeding, and decreased activity of FVIII, which is consistent with that of F8 deleterious variants. The 3'D protein structural analysis of the novel variant shows a change in FVIII protein stability, which may be responsible for the pathogenesis of HA. Conclusions: A novel deleterious variant was identified in our case, which expands the F8 variants spectrum. Our result is helpful for HA diagnosis and benefits carrier detection and prenatal diagnosis. Our study also reveals that mutation screening of the F8 gene should be necessary for HA suspected patients.

Individualised prophylaxis based on personalised target trough FVIII level optimised clinical outcomes in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

As standard care of severe haemophilia A (SHA), prophylaxis should be individualised.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of this new-proposed individualised prophylaxis protocol.

METHODS

Boys with SHA were enrolled and followed a PK-guided, trough-level escalating protocol of prophylaxis after a six-month observational period. In the next 2 years, clinical assessments including joint bleeds, ultrasound (US) scores and Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) in both sides of ankles, knees and elbows were conducted every 6 months as a scoring system, which determined whether the trough level's escalation. Adjustment of dosing regimen was based on WAPPS-Hemo.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight SHA boys were finally analysed. Their age and bodyweight were 5.3(2.8,6.9) years and 21.5(16,25) kg. During the study, 47 escalations were conducted. At study exit, the patient number and proportion of different trough level groups were: < 1 IU/dl, 17.2% (10/58); 1-3 IU/dl, 53.5% (31/58); 3-5 IU/dl, 15.5% (9/58); > 5 IU/dl, 13.8% (8/58). Significantly reduced annualised bleeding rate [4(0,8) to 0(0,2), p < .0001] and annualised joint bleeding rate [2(0,4) to 0(0,.25), p < .0001] was observed at study exit as well as the continuous trend of increased zero bleeding proportion (ZBP) (27.6%-69.0%) and zero joint bleeding proportion (46.5%-81.3%). Besides, 85% (6/7) of the target joints vanished. Statistical improvements of US scores (p = .04) and HJHS (p = .02) were also reported at study exit.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed the effectiveness of our protocol based on individualised target trough level and emphasise the importance of personalised prophylaxis.

The Limitations and Unmet Needs of the Five Cornerstones to Guarantee Lifelong Optimization of Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Patients

Prophylaxis to prevent bleeding is highly recommended for hemophilia patients. The development of new drugs and tools for modeling personalized prophylaxis provides the means for people with hemophilia to lead active lives with a quality of life comparable to that of nonhemophilic individuals. The choice of regimens must be made on a highly individual basis. Unfortunately, reference guides neither always concur in their recommendations nor provide directions to cover all possible scenarios. In this review, a group of experts identify the significant limitations and unmet needs of prophylaxis, taking advantage of their clinical experience in the disease, and supported by a rigorous literature update. To perform a more systematic and comprehensive search for gaps, the main cornerstones that influence decisions regarding prophylactic patterns were first identified.

Bleeding phenotype, joint status, physical activity, pharmacokinetics/medication properties, and adherence to treatment were considered as the primary mainstays that should allow physicians guiding prophylaxis to secure the best outcomes. Several challenges identified within each of these topics require urgent attention and agreement. The scores to assess severity of bleeding are not reliable, and lead to no consensus definition of severe bleeding phenotype. The joint status is to be redefined in light of new, more efficient treatments with an agreement to establish one scale as the unique reference for joint health. Further discussion is needed to establish the appropriateness of high-intensity physical activities according to patient profiles, especially because sustaining trough factor levels within the safe range is not always warranted for long periods. Importantly, many physicians do not benefit from the advantages provided by the programs based on population pharmacokinetic models to guide individualized prophylaxis through more efficient and cost-saving strategies. Finally, ensuring correct adherence to long-term treatments may be time-consuming for practitioners, who often have to encourage patients and review complex questionnaires.

In summary, we identify five cornerstones that influence prophylaxis and discuss the main conflicting concerns that challenge the proper long-term management of hemophilia. A consensus exercise is warranted to provide reliable guidelines and maximize benefit from recently developed tools that should notably improve patients' quality of life.

AOZORA: long-term safety and joint health in paediatric persons with haemophilia A without factor VIII inhibitors receiving emicizumab - protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase IV clinical study

INTRODUCTION

Persons with haemophilia A (PwHA) commonly experience regular bleeding into joints, which may result in joint damage and complications such as degenerative arthritis. Emicizumab has previously demonstrated efficacy in reducing the occurrence of joint bleeds and target joints, along with having a favourable safety profile; however, data on the long-term effects on joint health are lacking. The AOZORA study will evaluate the long-term safety and joint health of paediatric PwHA without factor (F)VIII inhibitors taking emicizumab; here, we report the details of the study protocol and baseline data.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

AOZORA is a multicentre, open-label, phase IV clinical study in Japan that aims to enrol approximately 30 PwHA aged <12 years without FVIII inhibitors. The primary endpoints include a long-term safety evaluation of adverse events, laboratory test abnormalities and FVIII inhibitor development; and a long-term joint health assessment using MRI and the Hemophilia Joint Health Score. Exploratory endpoints include characterising participants' physical activities and the number of activity-related bleeds requiring coagulation factor treatment. Currently, 30 participants have been enrolled, including 20 emicizumab-naïve participants and 10 who transferred from HOHOEMI, a previous study in paediatric PwHA.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The AOZORA study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Nara Medical University and the St Marianna University Group. The study will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the standards stipulated in paragraph 3 of Article 14 and Article 80-2 of the Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices and Other Therapeutic Products Act, the Ministerial Ordinance on Good Clinical Practice and the Ministerial Ordinance on Good Post-marketing Study Practice. Data will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at Global congresses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

JapicCTI-194701.

Risk factors for bleeding in people living with hemophilia A and B treated with regular prophylaxis: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Knowledge about the risk for bleeding in patients with hemophilia (PWH) would be relevant for patients, stakeholders, and policy makers.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review of the literature on risk assessment models (RAMs) and risk factors for bleeding in PWH on regular prophylaxis.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception through August 2019. In duplicate, reviewers screened the articles for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk for bias using the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool. A qualitative synthesis of the results was not performed due to high heterogeneity in risk factors, outcomes definition and measurement, and statistical analysis of the results.

RESULTS

From 1843 search results, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. No RAM for the risk for bleeding in PWH was found. Most studies included only PWH A or both PWH A and B and were conducted in North America or Europe. Only one study had a low risk for bias in all the domains. Eight categories of risk factors were identified. The risk for bleeding was increased when factor levels were lower and in people with a significant history of bleeding or who engaged in physical activities involving contact.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that plasma factor levels, history of bleeds, and physical activity should be considered for the derivation analysis when building a RAM for bleeding in PWH, and the role of other risk factors, including antithrombotic treatment and obesity, should be explored.

Low dose prophylaxis and antifibrinolytics: Options to consider with proven benefits for persons with haemophilia

INTRODUCTION

Prophylaxis has become standard of care for persons with severe phenotype haemophilia (PWsH). However, 'standard prophylaxis' with either factor or non-factor therapies (emicizumab) is prohibitively expensive for much of the world. We sought to evaluate whether haemophilia care can be provided at a lower cost yet achieve good results using Lower dose/Lower frequency prophylaxis (LDP) and with increasing use of antifibrinolytics (Tranexamic acid and Epsilon amino caproic acid).

METHODS

We identified 12 studies that collectively included 335 PWsH using LDP. Additionally, we undertook a literature search regarding the benefits of antifibrinolytics in haemophilia care.

RESULTS

Identified studies show that LDP is far superior to no prophylaxis (On demand [OD] therapy) resulting in significant patient benefits. Patients on LDP showed (in comparison to patients OD) on average: 72% less total bleeds; 75% less joint bleeds; 91% less days lost from school; 77% less hospital admission days; and improved quality of life measures. These benefits come at similar or only slightly higher (< 2-fold greater) costs than OD therapy. Antifibrinolytics are effective adjunctive agents in managing bleeds (oral, nasal, intracranial, possibly other) and providing haemostasis for surgeries (particularly oral surgeries). Antifibrinolytics can substitute for more expensive factor concentrates or can reduce the use of such concentrates. There is evidence to show that antifibrinolytics may be used in conjunction with factor concentrates/emicizumab for more effective/less costly prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LDP along with appropriate and increased use of antifibrinolytics offers less resourced countries good options for managing patients with haemophilia.

Low-dose prophylaxis and its impact on the health of haemophilia patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is convincing evidence to show that low-dose prophylaxis (LDP) results in reduction in annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and better health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with on-demand or episodic treatment (ET) in haemophilia patients. The aim is to review various LDP protocols practised for the treatment of haemophilia, specifically in resource-limited countries.

METHODS

A literature survey was made of articles published in English language in PubMed and EMBASE without any time limit using keywords 'low dose', 'prophylaxis' and 'haemophilia' in different combinations.

RESULTS

A total of 19 reports involving LDP in patients with haemophilia were included in this review. Almost all studies reported reduction in ABR, improvement in joint function, pain and HRQoL compared with ET, but this did not fully translate into significant improvement in structural arthropathy already caused by earlier bleeds, suggesting that LDP may be less or ineffective in either stopping or reversing the damage. Individualized dose escalation protocols based on pharmacokinetic (PK) or clinical parameters were found to be superior to fixed LDP protocols and cost-effective compared with standard dose protocols.

CONCLUSION

The developing countries can initiate LDP as the first step of prophylaxis, but certainly this should not be the final goal of the health care system in any country. Due to the complex pathophysiological mechanisms underlying haemophilic arthropathy, long-term data on LDP in haemophilia patients are warranted.

Magnetic resonance imaging in boys with severe hemophilia A: Serial and end-of-study findings from the Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis Study

BACKGROUND

This study examined the structural outcomes for joints of boys with severe hemophilia A receiving frequency/dose-escalated primary prophylaxis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the importance of interval MRI changes.

METHODS

Forty-six subjects (27 with interval studies) were evaluated by radiographs (X-rays) and mid- and end-of-study MRIs (using the International Prophylaxis Study Group scale), as part of the Canadian Hemophilia Prophylaxis Study. The primary outcome was the presence of MRI osteochondral findings.

RESULTS

The median (range) time on study at the end-of-study MRI examination was 9.6 (4.8-16.0) years, during which 18 of 46 subjects (39%) had osteochondral changes in at least one joint. An interval change in MRI score of at least 1 point was observed in 44% of joints (43 ankles, 21 elbows, 4 knees); at least one joint showed this change in all 27 subjects. Self-reported interval hemarthrosis was associated with a higher likelihood of interval osteochondral change (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-2.06). Presence of synovial hypertrophy or hemosiderin on interval MRIs was associated with an OR of 4.71 (95% CI, 1.92-11.57) and 5.25 (95% CI, 2.05-13.40) of later osteochondral changes on MRI.

DISCUSSION

MRI changes were seen in 39% of subjects. Interval index joint bleeding was associated with an increased risk of later MRI changes, and earlier soft-tissue changes were associated with subsequent osteochondral changes.

Clotting factor concentrates for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in previously treated individuals with haemophilia A or B

BACKGROUND

The hallmark of severe hemophilia (A or B) is recurrent bleeding into joints and soft tissues with progressive joint damage, despite on-demand treatment. Prophylaxis has long been used, but not universally adopted, because of medical, psychosocial, and cost controversies.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of clotting factor concentrate prophylaxis in managing previously-treated individuals with hemophilia A or B.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. In addition, we searched MEDLINE and Embase and online trial registries. Most recent search of Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register: 24 February 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating people with hemophilia A or hemophilia B, who were previously treated with clotting factor concentrates to manage their hemophilia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently reviewed trials for eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. The authors used the GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials (including 608 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Eight of the trials (477 participants) had arms comparing two or more prophylactic regimens to one another and four of the trials (n = 258) compared prophylaxis to on-demand treatment (two trials had multiple arms and were included in both comparisons). Comparison of two or more prophylactic regimens For trials comparing one prophylaxis regimen to another, given the heterogeneity of the data, none of the data were pooled for this comparison. Considering the individual trials, three trials reported the primary outcome of joint bleeding, and none showed a dfference between dosing regimens (low-certainty evidence). For the secondary outcome of total bleeding events, prophylaxis with a twice-weekly regimen of FIX likely results in reduced total bleeds compared to a once-a-week regimen of the same dose, mean difference (MD) 11.2 (5.81 to 16.59) (one trial, 10 participants, low-certainty evidence). Transient low-titer anti-FVIII inhibitors were reported in one of the trials. Blood-transmitted infections were not identified. Other adverse events reported include hypersensitivity, oedema, and weight gain. These were, however, rare and unrelated to study drugs (very low-certainty evidence). Comparison of prophylactic and on-demand regimens Four of the trials (258 participants) had arms that compared prophylaxis to on-demand treatment. Prophylaxis may result in a large decrease in the number of joint bleeds compared to on-demand treatment, MD -30.34 (95% CI -46.95 to -13.73) (two trials, 164 participants, low-certainty evidence). One of these trials (84 participants) also reported the long-term effects of prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy showing improved joint function, quality of life, and pain; but no differences between groups in joint structure when assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In one trial (84 participants) validated measures for joint health and pain assessment showed that prophylaxis likely improves joint health compared to an on-demand regimen with an estimated change difference of 0.94 points (95% CI 0.23 to 1.65) and improves total pain scores, MD -17.20 (95% CI -27.48 to -6.92 (moderate-certainty evidence). Two trials (131 participants) reported that prophylaxis likely results in a slight increase in adverse events, risk ratio 1.71 (1.24 to 2.37) (moderate-certainty evidence). No inhibitor development and blood-transmitted infections were identified. Overall, the certainty of the body of evidence was judged to be low because of different types of bias that could have altered the effect.   AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence from RCTs that prophylaxis, as compared to on-demand treatment, may reduce bleeding frequency in previously-treated people with hemophilia. Prophylaxis may also improve joint function, pain and quality of life, even though this does not translate into a detectable improvement of articular damage when assessed by MRI.  When comparing two different prophylaxis regimens, no significant differences in terms of protection from bleeding were found. Dose optimization could, however, result in improved efficacy. Given the heterogeneity of the data, pooled estimates were not obtained for most comparisons.  Well-designed RCTs and prospective observational controlled studies with standardised definitions and measurements are needed to establish the optimal and most cost-effective treatment regimens.

Tailored prophylaxis in children with severe hemophilia: A four-year Iranian study

BACKGROUND

Prophylaxis the current standard care for patients with severe hemophilia should be planned to optimize the replacement therapy and minimize bleeding. We report our single-center experience of tailored prophylaxis in children affected by hemophilia A (HA) and hemophilia B (HB).

METHODS

This study was conducted on 55 patients, under 15 years, with HA (PWHA, n: 46) and HB (PWHB, n: 9) between 2015 and 2019. According to the phenotype, three prophylaxis regimens: 25-50 unit/kg once, twice, or three-times a week for PWHA, and two: 30-50 unit/kg once or twice a week for PWHB were administered. Following the occurrence of > 3 joint bleeding, or > 4 soft tissue bleeding, or one spontaneous major bleeding in the last 3 months, the prophylaxis regimen is changed. Annualized bleeding rate (ABR), annualized joint bleeding rate (AJBR), target joints development, inhibitor development, and hemophilia joint health score (HJHS) also were assessed.

RESULTS

A mean ± SD of 2520 ± 1045 IU/kg/yr coagulation factor (F) VIII was used to reduce ABR and AJBR from 1.02 ± 1.11 and 0.8 ± 1.3 (in the first year of the study) to 0.27 ± 0.44 (P < 0.001) and 0.19 ± 0.38 (P = 0.004) (at the end of the study) in PWHA, respectively. Furthermore, in PWHB, in the first year of the study, with using 2168 ± 1216 IU/kg coagulation FIX, ABR and AJBR were 0.19 ± 0.39 and 0.06 ± 0.1. At the end of the study, ABR and AJBR were 0.02 ± 0.05 (p = 0.156) and 0.01 ± 0.03 (p = 0.361), respectively. During the study period, the mean number of the target joints and mean HJHS were 0.25 ± 0.57 and 7.6 ± 2.1 for PWHA and 0 and 6.3 ± 1.8 for PWHB, respectively. Finally, 5 PWHA (11 %) did not need dose-escalation in their prophylaxis regimen, whereas 31 (67 %) and 10 (21 %) PWHA needed two and three infusions a week, respectively. In PWHB, 7 (78 %) and 2 (22 %) were adjusted to receive a once and twice weekly regimen, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that tailored prophylaxis is an effective strategy to reduce the rate of bleeding and optimize the replacement therapy in children with hemophilia.

Pharmacokinetics and complementary evaluation system-based guidance on prophylaxis of paediatric patients with haemophilia A in China with Kovaltry: protocol of the LEAP study

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia A is a rare inherited bleeding disease caused by the deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The main treatment protocol is to administer regular exogenous FVIII concentrate infusions. With the discovery of variability in individualised pharmacokinetics (PK) and bleeding phenotype, the previous weight-based approach needs to be replaced by more advanced PK-tailored prophylaxis with an accurate evaluation system. In this study, we combine individualised PK profiles and a complementary evaluation system to guide prophylaxis in paediatric patients with haemophilia A.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a single-centre, prospective single-arm study. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a new strategy combining PK and a complementary evaluation system to treat haemophilia A in Chinese paediatric patients. Sixty paediatric patients with haemophilia will be recruited. After PK testing, they will receive a PK-guided stepup prophylaxis in the next 2 years. The dosing regimen will be determined according to individualised PK profiles and complementary evaluation findings. Related indicators at the end of the study will be compared with the values at treatment initiation to examine the effectiveness of this new strategy. The demographic data of the investigated patients will be summarised by descriptive statistics. Quantitative data will be described by summary statistics, including arithmetic median, range, mean and arithmetic SD. Analyses will use t-test to compare indicators such as bleeding rate and imaging score at both ends of the study as well as during follow-up.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Children's Hospital (Number 2020-Z-095). The findings will be presented at international meetings such as World Federation of Hemophilia World Congress. Related manuscripts will be submitted to peer-review journals such as Blood and Hemophilia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2000037821; Pre-results.

Patterns of joint damage in severe haemophilia A treated with prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to assess whether there are different patterns (classes) of joint health in young boys with severe haemophilia A (SHA) prescribed primary tailored prophylaxis. We also assessed whether age at first index joint bleed, blood group, FVIII gene abnormality variant, factor VIII trough level, first-year bleeding rate and adherence to the prescribed prophylaxis regimen significantly predicted joint damage trajectory, and thus class membership.

METHODS

Using data collected prospectively as part of the Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis Study (CHPS), we implemented a latent class growth mixture model technique to determine how many joint damage classes existed within the cohort. We used a multinomial logistic regression to predict the odds of class membership based on the above predictors. We fitted a survival model to assess whether there were differences in the rate of dose escalation across the groups.

RESULTS

We identified three distinct classes of trajectory: persistently low, moderately increasing and rapidly increasing joint scores. By multinomial regression, we found that only age at first index joint bleed predicted rapidly increasing joint scores. The rapidly increasing joint score class group moved through dose escalation significantly faster than the other two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Using tailored prophylaxis, boys with SHA follow one of three joint health trajectories. By using knowledge of disease trajectories, clinicians may be able to adjust treatment according to a subject's predicted long-term joint health and institute cost-effective programmes of prophylaxis targeted at the individual subject level.

Pharmacokinetic study of Kovaltry in thirty-five pediatric patients aged <12 years with severe hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Kovaltry (BAY81-8973) is an unmodified full-length factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate that enhances the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles as compared to some other standard half-life time FVIII concentrates. However, the PK of Kovaltry in haemophiliac patients aged <12 years has not been reported previously.

AIM

To investigate the pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes of Kovaltry in 35 paediatric patients aged <12 years.

METHODS

A total of 35 boys with severe haemophilia A were enrolled from August 2019 to May 2020 in Beijing Children's Hospital. After 72-hour washout, PK tests were performed post-infusion of 50 IU/kg Kovaltry in a five-timepoint assay. WinNonlin software was used to generate individual PK parameters. The dose, frequency and bleeding details were collected within the first 6 months after switching to Kovaltry from other FVIII concentrates.

RESULTS

Compared to the blood group O, patients with blood group non-O showed longer mean half-life (t_1/2 ) (p < .01), lower mean clearance (CL) (p = .01) and similar in vivo recovery (IVR) (p = .51). Higher von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) level was correlated to longer t_1/2 (p < .0001) and lower CL (p < .01). IVR was correlated to body mass index (BMI) (p < .0001). Patients with trough level >3 IU/dL demonstrated lower annual bleeding rate (ABR) (p < .01), annual joint bleeding rate (AJBR) (p < .01) and annual spontaneous bleeding rate (ASBR) (p < .01).

CONCLUSION

This study firstly reported the PK profiles of Kovaltry in 35 paediatric patients <12 years old. The great inter-individual variability of PK parameters was also confirmed in these patients. VWF:Ag and blood group were major influencing factors of t_1/2 and CL of Kovaltry, while BMI was a vital predictor for IVR. Patients with high trough FVIII level in routine prophylaxis had reduced bleeding rates.

Evolution of clotting factor concentrates prescriptions and impact of recommendations of prophylaxis in children with haemophilia

Prophylaxis treatment is considered as the reference approach for children with severe haemophilia A or B. However, no consensus about the best prophylaxis protocol has yet been identified in term of dosage and timing of infusions. Guidelines were drawn up in France in the early 2000s by an expert group. The objective of this 16-year study (2001 to 2016) was to describe the clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) use in haemophiac outpatients. This is a retrospective monocentric study. Pharmaceutical and clinical data were captured using medical records. Main outcome measures are CFCs use and clinical data in paediatrics. Eighty haemophiliacs A or B under 12 years old with a factor level less than 2% were included (74% of HA), from pharmaceutical outpatient data. Global use of CFCs followed the evolution of the patients' number and regimen type introduced: increase of prophylaxis and decrease of on demand regimen. The average age at the prophylaxis introduction is significantly different according to the birth year. Prophylaxis introduction was made earlier with an increase of prophylactic regimen joined to an increase of CFCs use. The significant reduction of haemarthrosis in our cohort can be linked to a first infusion age and a prophylaxis introduction much earlier.

Critical appraisal of the International Prophylaxis Study Group magnetic resonance image scale for evaluating haemophilic arthropathy

A goal of the International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) is to provide an accurate instrument to measure MRI-based disease severity of haemophilic arthropathy at various time points, so that longitudinal changes in disease severity can be identified to support decisions on treatment management. We review and discuss in this paper the evaluative purpose of the IPSG MRI scale in relation to its development and validation processes so far. We also critically appraise the validity, reliability and responsiveness of using the IPSG MRI scale in different clinical and research settings, and whenever applicable, compare these clinimetric properties of the IPSG MRI scale with those of its precursors, the compatible additive and progressive MRI scales.

Hemophilia prophylaxis adherence and bleeding using a tailored, frequency-escalated approach: The Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis Study

BACKGROUND

Standard of care for persons with severe hemophilia A includes regular replacement of factor VIII (FVIII). Prophylaxis regimens using standard half-life (SHL) FVIII concentrates, while effective, are costly and require frequent intravenous infusions.

AIM

This study evaluated the adherence of 56 boys with severe hemophilia A to tailored, frequency-escalated prophylaxis with an SHL recombinant FVIII concentrate.

METHODS

We reviewed the factor infusion and bleeding logs of study subjects. Adherence to the prescribed regimen was calculated on a weekly basis, and bleeding rates were determined from self/proxy-reported bleeding logs. The primary outcome was adherence to the prescribed prophylaxis regimen.

RESULTS

The median (range of values [ROV]) weekly adherence to prophylaxis was 85.7% (37.4%-99.8%). The median (ROV) adherent weeks on steps 1 (weekly), 2 (twice weekly), and 3 (alternate-day) were 92.9% (50%-100%), 80.3 (32%-96%), and 72.6% (14%-98%); relative to step 1, subjects were less likely to be adherent on steps 2 and 3 (P < 0.00). On step 1, our cohort had higher adherence than previously reported rates. The median (ROV) adherence to the breakthrough bleeding protocol was 47.1% (0%-100%). At any given time, bleeding risk was reduced by 15% for each 10% increase in adherence during the preceding 12 weeks (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.90).

CONCLUSION

This cohort had high rates of adherence to the prescribed prophylaxis regimen. Initiating prophylaxis with once-weekly infusions facilitated adherence to the prophylaxis regimen in this cohort of boys with severe hemophilia A started on primary prophylaxis at a very young age.

Clinical application of Web Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service-Hemophilia (WAPPS-Hemo): Patterns of blood sampling and patient characteristics among clinician users

BACKGROUND

Use of population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) to facilitate PK-informed prophylaxis in clinical practice has gained momentum among haemophilia providers due to the accessibility of tools such as the Web Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service-Hemophilia (WAPPS-Hemo) and availability of extended half-life (EHL) factor concentrates. It is unknown how clinicians implement PopPK.

AIM

To investigate the evolution of PopPK use in clinical practice by comparing blood sampling strategies, patient features, and factor group between initial and recent periods of WAPPS-Hemo availability.

METHODS

PK data for haemophilia A and haemophilia B patients from two time periods were extracted from the WAPPS-Hemo database: early availability (10/2015-09/2016) and recent use (10/2017-09/2018). We compared patient characteristics (age, body weight, haemophilia type), product type and dose, and blood sampling times between the time frames.

RESULTS

Over 1900 eligible infusions were submitted to WAPPS-Hemo during the periods studied, with 85% representing FVIII concentrates. In the recent cohort, PK profiles were requested for younger patients (median age 18 vs 26 years), with increased proportional EHL FVIII use (29% vs 14% of infusions). High-use centres generally submitted fewer blood samples per infusion than non-high-use centres, although the number of samples collected by non-high-use centres decreased significantly over time. During both periods, blood sample timing was generally consistent with ISTH recommended windows.

CONCLUSION

The use of WAPPS-Hemo by haemophilia providers grew by over threefold between the time periods investigated. While sampling times have included key time points proposed first by Björkman since early WAPPS-Hemo usage, a trend towards minimizing sampling was observed.

BAY 94-9027 prophylaxis is efficacious and well tolerated for up to >5 years with extended dosing intervals: PROTECT VIII extension interim results

Introduction

BAY 94‐9027 is an extended‒half‐life, site‐specifically PEGylated, B‐domain‒deleted recombinant factor VIII (FVIII). The PROTECT VIII main study demonstrated efficacy of bleed control using extended‐interval prophylaxis with BAY 94‐9027 for 36 weeks.

Aim

To report long‐term efficacy and safety of prophylaxis with BAY 94‐9027 in a descriptive analysis of the ongoing PROTECT VIII extension with a total treatment time of up to >5 years.

Methods

Previously treated males aged 12‐65 years with severe haemophilia A who completed the PROTECT VIII main study were eligible for the open‐label extension. Patients received on‐demand treatment or prophylaxis (30‒40 IU/kg twice weekly, 45‒60 IU/kg every 5 days, or 60 IU/kg every 7 days) and could switch regimens as needed.

Results

Patients (N = 121; on demand, n = 14; prophylaxis, n = 107) accumulated a median (range) of 3.9 years (297‒1965 days) and 223 (23‒563) total exposure days by 31 January 2018. During the extension, median (quartile [Q]1; Q3) annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) for total bleeds were 1.6 (0.3; 4.6) for patients receiving prophylaxis and 34.1 (20.3; 36.6) for patients receiving on‐demand treatment. ABRs for twice‐weekly (n = 23), every‐5‐days (n = 33), every‐7‐days (n = 23) and variable frequency (n = 28) treatments were 1.7, 1.2, 0.7 and 3.1, respectively. Of prophylaxis patients, 20.6% were bleed‐free throughout the extension (median time, 3.2 years), and 51.0% were bleed‐free during the last 6 months. No patients developed FVIII inhibitors.

Conclusions

BAY 94‐9027 prophylaxis was efficacious and well tolerated with dosing intervals up to every 7 days for a median (range) of 3.9 years (0.8‐5.4 years).

Protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a musculoskeletal exercise intervention versus usual care for children with haemophilia

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia is a rare, inherited disorder in which blood does not clot normally, resulting in bleeding into joints and muscles. Long-term consequence is disabling joint pain, stiffness, muscle weakness, atrophy and reduced mobility. The purpose of this proposed feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to test the feasibility of an age-appropriate physiotherapy intervention designed to improve muscle strength, posture and the way boys use their joints during walking and everyday activities.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A small-scale two-centre RCT of a 12-week muscle strengthening exercise intervention versus usual care for young children with haemophilia will be conducted. Primary outcomes will be safety and adherence to the exercise intervention. Secondary outcomes will include recruitment, retention and adverse event rates, clinical data, muscle strength, joint biomechanics and foot loading patterns during walking, 6 min timed walk, timed-up-and-down-stairs, EQ-5D-Y, participants' perceptions of the study, training requirements and relevant costs. Recruitment, follow-up, safety and adherence rates will be described as percentages. Participant diary and interview data will be analysed using a framework analysis. Demographic and disease variable distributions will be analysed for descriptive purposes and covariant analysis. Estimates of differences between treatment arms (adjusted for baseline) and 75% and 95% CIs will be calculated.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has ethical approval from the London-Fulham Research Ethics Committee (17/LO/2043) as well as Health Research Authority approval. As well as informing the design of the definitive trial, results of this study will be presented at local, national and international physiotherapy and haemophilia meetings as well as manuscripts submitted to peer-reviewed journals. We will also share the main findings of the study to all participants and the Haemophilia Society.

Low Dose Prophylaxis in Hemophilia Care

Hemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder which causes impaired blood clotting. The severity of disease depends on the type of Hemophilia, level of clotting factor concentrate (CFC), phenotypic heterogeneity and the development of inhibitors. The currently accepted standard of care of this disease is prophylaxis therapy (PT) with CFC. Prophylaxis therapy for Hemophilia is given in developed countries for the last few decades. On the contrary, episodic therapy (ET) is still the mode of treatment in middle and low income countries. ET is documented to have several potential risks such as increased bleeding rate, disability due to haemarthrosis, poor quality of life and increased chances of mortality. Several studies conducted in developed countries have confirmed the clinical efficacy of PT in Hemophilia treatment. Currently, there exist several challenges for implementation of this effective treatment in resource poor nations. Low dose prophylaxis (LDP) has been developed as a solution to minimize these challenges and to provide better care for subjects with Hemophilia from low resource countries. The impact of LDP was evaluated by several recent studies and the reported clinical outcomes seem to suggest an optimistic future for this line of therapy. Several themes related to Hemophilia care like inhibitor development, tolerance, pharmacokinetics of CFCs and cost-benefit analysis of different prophylaxis regimens are currently understood poorly. These distinct elements are highly relevant to assess the actual benefits of LDP regimen in a global scale.

From the voices of people with haemophilia A and their caregivers: Challenges with current treatment, their impact on quality of life and desired improvements in future therapies

Introduction

Haemophilia A is a chronic disease requiring frequent intravenous infusions of recombinant factor VIII. Previous studies have shown that challenges associated with current treatments may have significant impacts on quality of life (QoL) that are as important as the health outcomes conferred by the therapy. Emerging therapeutic innovations offer the potential to mitigate treatment‐related challenges, and it is therefore important to develop a better understanding of patient and caregiver experiences with existing haemophilia A treatments in order to characterize the full value of new treatments.

Aim

To gather firsthand perspectives from people with haemophilia A (PWHA) and caregivers on the challenges with current treatment, their impact on QoL and desired improvements in future therapies.

Methods

Qualitative insights were gathered from 20 non‐inhibitor PWHA or caregivers of PWHA across Canada through one‐on‐one interviews; insights were further explored through focus group sessions to uncover overarching themes and prioritize issues with current treatments.

Results

PWHA and caregivers identified several challenges, including administration of intravenous infusions, coordination of treatment schedules and ensuring adequate medication and supplies. Participants described how these challenges impact psychosocial well‐being, physical health, personal/social life and work. Alternate modes of administration and longer‐lasting treatment effects were identified as desired improvements over current treatments.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the impact that existing haemophilia A treatments have on psychological well‐being, employment opportunities and adherence to treatment regimens. These considerations may help to inform decision‐making for policymakers and health systems around the true value of new therapies entering the haemophilia market.

Measurement of joint health in persons with haemophilia: A systematic review of the measurement properties of haemophilia-specific instruments

INTRODUCTION

Accurate assessment of joint health in persons with haemophilia is crucial. Several haemophilia-specific measurement tools are available, but an overview of the measurement properties is lacking.

AIM

To provide an overview of the measurement properties of haemophilia-specific measurement tools to assess clinical joint health.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for reports on reliability, validity or responsiveness of the World Federation of Haemophilia Orthopedic Joint Score (WFH), Colorado Physical Examination Score (CPE), joint examination score by Petrini (PJS) and Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS). Methodological quality of the studies was assessed using an adapted COSMIN checklist.

RESULTS

The search yielded 2905 unique hits, and 98 papers were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was limited. The HJHS was studied most extensively, which yielded limited evidence for good internal consistency and structural validity, moderate evidence for hypothesis testing in adults and conflicting evidence for hypothesis testing in children. Reliability, measurement error and responsiveness were rated unknown due to low COSMIN scores. For the CPE and PJS, we found limited to moderate evidence for good responsiveness and conflicting evidence for hypothesis testing.

CONCLUSION

Only patchy evidence is available on the quality of measurement properties of all haemophilia-specific joint health scores. Although significant gaps in the evidence for all instruments remain, measurement properties of the HJHS were most extensively studied and show no drawbacks for use in clinical practice. This review forms the basis for further research aimed at the assessment of measurement properties of measurement tools to assess joint health.

Attempting to remedy sub-optimal medication adherence in haemophilia: The rationale for repeated ultrasound visualisations of the patient's joint status

Haemophilia is marked by joint bleeding (haemarthrosis) leading to cartilage damage (arthropathy). Lifelong prophylaxis-initiated after the first bleeding episode-leads to a dramatic decrease in arthropathy in haemophilia patients. However, adherence to continuous intravenous administrations of factor VIII (FVIII) or FIX products is challenging, and patients potentially suffer from breakthrough bleedings while on prophylaxis. Newer FVIII/FIX products with enhanced convenience attributes and/or easier infusion procedures are intended to improve adherence. However, pharmacokinetic data should be harmonised with information from individual attitudes and treatment needs, to tailor intravenous dosing and scheduling in patients who receive extended half-life products. Nor is there sound evidence as to how subcutaneous non-FVIII/FIX replacement approaches (concizumab; emicizumab; fitusiran) or single intravenous injections of adeno-associated viral vectors (when employing gene therapy) will revolutionize adherence in haemophilia. In rheumatoid arthritis, repeated ultrasound examination of a patient's major joints is a valuable tool to educate patients and parents to understand the disease and provide an objective framework for clinicians to acknowledge patient's adherence. Joint ultrasound examination in haemophilia significantly correlates with cartilage damage, effusion, and synovial hypertrophy evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, in patients with haemophilia undergoing prophylaxis with an extended half-life product for a ≈ 2.8 year period, a significant continued improvement in joint health is detected at the physical examination. This provides the rationale for studies on repeated ultrasound examinations of joint status to attempt to remedy sub-optimal medication adherence and help identify which approach is most suited on which occasion and for which patient.

Common themes and challenges in hemophilia care: a multinational perspective

OBJECTIVE

To identify ways that provision of hemophilia care can be maximized at the local level, irrespective of available resources or cultural or geographic challenges.

METHODS

The SHIELD group used its multinational experience to share examples of local initiatives that have been employed to deliver optimal hemophilia care.

RESULTS

The examples were reviewed and categorized into four key themes: guidelines and algorithms for delivery of care; collaboration with patients and allied groups for care and education; registries for the monitoring of treatment and outcomes and health care planning and delivery; and opportunities for personalization of care. These themes were then incorporated into a road map for collaborative care in hemophilia that reflected the contribution of best practice.

DISCUSSION

Differing healthcare reimbursement systems, budgetary constraints, and geographical and cultural factors make it difficult for any country to fully deliver ideal care for people with hemophilia. The SHIELD approach for collaborative care provides illustrative examples of how four key themes can be used to optimize hemophilia care in any setting.

ABBREVIATIONS

AHCDC: Association of Hemophilia Clinic Directors of Canada; AICE: Italian Association of Hemophilia Centres; ATHN: American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network; EAHAD: European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders; EHC: European Hemophilia Consortium; FIX: Coagulation Factor IX; FVIII: Coagulation Factor VIII; HAL: Haemophilia Activity List; HJHS: Haemophilia Joint Health Score; HTC: Hemophilia Treatment Centre; HTCCNC: Hemophilia Treatment Centre Collaborative Network of China; MASAC: Medical and Scientific Advisory Council; MDT: Multidisciplinary team; NHD: National Haemophilia Database; NHF: National Hemophilia Foundation; PK: Pharmacokinetics; POCUS: Point of care ultrasound; PWH: People with haemophilia; SHIELD: Supporting Hemophilia through International Education, Learning and Development; WFH: World Federation of Hemophilia.

Prophylactic versus on-demand treatments for hemophilia: advantages and drawbacks

INTRODUCTION

Early long-term prophylaxis is the standard of care to prevent joint bleeding and chronic arthropathy in patients with severe hemophilia. Areas covered: Despite the obvious prophylaxis advantages upon the clinical outcomes, there are still several drawbacks to be addressed for the optimal patients' compliance. Frequency of treatment due to short half-life of conventional FVIII and FIX concentrates, difficult venous access, adherence to the prescribed therapy and costs may represent significant critical issues. The development of inhibitors also makes replacement therapy ineffective, preventing patients from receiving long-term prophylaxis. This paper will review these drawbacks and the tools to overcome these limitations, mainly thanks to the use of extended half-life products and the development of novel non-conventional therapeutic approaches. Expert commentary: The use of extended half-life products may help in reducing the burden of the frequent intravenous administration and in better tailoring an individualized prophylaxis. The development of novel therapeutic approaches, like the bi-specific antibody mimicking the coagulation function of FVIII or inhibition of anticoagulant proteins may facilitate prophylaxis treatment not only in patients with inhibitors, but also in severe hemophilia patients without inhibitors. Exciting opportunities are emerging for improving prophylaxis in hemophilia.

Tailored frequency-escalated primary prophylaxis for severe haemophilia A: results of the 16-year Canadian Hemophilia Prophylaxis Study longitudinal cohort

BACKGROUND

Severe haemophilia A has high morbidity, and treatment, while effective, is very expensive. We report the 16-year follow-up of the Canadian Hemophilia Prophylaxis Study, which examined the effectiveness of tailored frequency-escalated primary prophylaxis with a focus on health outcomes within the domains of body structures and functions, and activities and participation (according to the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health [WHO-ICF] framework) and a view to reducing consumption of costly clotting factor, which accounts for more than 90% of the cost of care of severe haemophilia.

METHODS

In this longitudinal study, boys with severe haemophilia A from 12 Canadian centres were enrolled at age 1·0-2·5 years. They were treated with standard half-life recombinant factor VIII (SHL-rFVIII), beginning as once-weekly prophylaxis with 50 IU/kg and escalating in frequency (with accompanying dose adjustments) in response to breakthrough bleeding as determined by the protocol. The primary endpoint for this analysis was joint health, as measured by the modified Colorado Child Physical Examination Scores (CCPES) at study end. All analyses were done by intention to treat. The trial is complete, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01085344.

FINDINGS

Between June 26, 1997, and Jan 30, 2007, 56 boys were enrolled. They were followed for a median of 10·2 years (to a maximum of 16·1 years). Median rFVIII usage was about 3600 IU/kg per year. The median end-of-study CCPES physical examination score was 1 (IQR 1-3; range 0-12) for the left ankle and 1 (1-2; 0-12) for the right ankle, with all other joints having a median score of 0. No treatment-related safety events occurred over the duration of the study, including central venous catheter infections. The median annualised index joint bleeding rate was 0·95 per year (IQR 0·44-1·35; range 0·00-13·43), but 17 (30%) patients had protocol-defined unacceptable breakthrough bleeding at some point during the study.

INTERPRETATION

Tailored frequency-escalated prophylaxis leads to very little arthropathy and very good health outcomes within the WHO-ICF domains, and only uses a moderate amount of expensive clotting factor as compared with standard prophylaxis protocols. Some sequelae of bleeding were observed in our cohort, and future studies should consider a more stringent protocol of escalation.

FUNDING

This study was initially funded by grants from the Medical Research Council of Canada/Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of Canada Partnership Fund and the Bayer/Canadian Blood Services/Hema-Quebec Partnership Fund. Subsequent renewals were funded by Bayer.

Practical considerations in choosing a factor VIII prophylaxis regimen: Role of clinical phenotype and trough levels

Current therapy for haemophilia A is guided by severity of the disease, which in turn is best reflected in patients' endogenous factor VIII activity levels. For patients with severe haemophilia (particularly children), prophylaxis with continuous routine factor replacement has become standard of care in developed countries and is gradually becoming the standard of care in developing countries. The question arises then: what is an appropriate prophylaxis regimen to prevent bleeding events and arthropathy, while also maximizing patient quality of life and taking into consideration the costs of prophylaxis? Should all patients be treated with one standard, fixed prophylaxis regimen, or should prophylaxis be individualised for each patient? If so, what factors need to be considered in choosing the appropriate dose and frequency of factor administration? If prophylaxis is tailored to the individual patient, then patient-related factors (bleeding phenotype, activity profiles, age, joint status) and product-specific factors (half-life of the replacement factor in the individual patient) will determine the choice of regimen, whether it be a fixed-regimen prophylaxis or prophylaxis that is tailored to patient activity and bleeding risk. Regardless of the choice of prophylaxis regimen, for any regimen to be effective, adherence to therapy is key to optimising outcomes.

Break-through bleeding in relation to pharmacokinetics of Factor VIII in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

As the pharmacokinetics (PK) of factor VIII (FVIII) is individualized in children with haemophilia A (HA), PK parameters may be indicators of patients' bleeding phenotype and instruction for their personalized replacement program.

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible relationship between PK/FVIII level and bleeding frequency in Chinese paediatric patients with severe (HA).

METHODS

A total of 24 patients were enrolled in Beijing Children's Hospital from February to October 2015, all of whom were given 50 IU/kg of FVIII concentrates after a 72-hours washout period. Samples' activities (FVIII:C) were tested at 5 time points, using WinNonlin software for PK testing, and then the individual half-life(t_1/2 ) and the time (h) of FVIII concentrations <1 IU/dL within a week during prophylaxis were calculated. Baseline and the annual bleeding rate (ABR), annual joint bleeding rate (AJBR) were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean t_1/2 of FVIII was 10.20 ± 2.72 hours and the mean time of FVIII <1 IU/dL in 1 week was 44.7 hours (-38.56 to 102.33 hours). A significant relationship between t_1/2 of FVIII and ABR₀ /AJBR₀ (baseline bleeding) was found (R²  = 0.75 and 0.62, P < .001). Besides, baseline and the annual bleeding rate during prophylactic treatment of haemophilia had a positive correlation with the time (hours) of FVIII <1 IU/dL in 1 week (R²  = 0.67 and 0.52, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

t_1/2 was an important indicator to prevent bleeding in severe HA; the frequency of bleeding will be reduced with the increased of t_1/2 of FVIII. The data also demonstrates that increasing the time with a FVIII<1 IU/dL is associated with an increased rate of bleeding during prophylaxis.

Two global haemostatic assays as additional tools to monitor treatment in cases of haemophilia A

Haemophilia A patients with similar levels of factor VIII (FVIII) may have different bleeding phenotypes and responses to treatment with FVIII concentrate. Therefore, a test which determines overall haemostasis may be appropriate for treatment monitoring in some patients. We studied two global haemostatic methods: endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and overall haemostatic potential (OHP) before and after injection of FVIII concentrate in patients with haemophilia A treated prophylactically and on-demand. A significant correlation between FVIII and both ETP and OHP was observed, while ETP and OHP differed between patients with severe and mild clinical phenotypes. Both ETP and OHP differed significantly between severe, moderate and mild haemophilia A and controls. ETP and OHP increased after intravenous injection of FVIII concentrate in both groups of patients, but in spite of higher pre-treatment values of both ETP and OHP in patients treated prophylactically, and much higher post-treatment FVIII levels in comparison with the values in patients treated on-demand, no difference after treatment was observed for either ETP or OHP. ETP and OHP may be additional alternatives for monitoring (and even for individual tailoring) treatment in patients with haemophilia A.

Progress in the contemporary management of hemophilia: The new issue of patient aging

The management of inherited coagulation disorders such as hemophilia A and B has witnessed dramatic progresses since the last few decades of the last century. Accordingly, persons with hemophilia (PWH) now enjoy a life expectancy at birth not different from that of males in the general population, at least in high income countries. Nowadays, a substantial proportion of PWH are aging, like their peers in the general population. This outstanding progress is accompanied by problems that are in part similar to those of any old person (multiple concomitant diseases and the resulting intake of multiple drugs other than those specific for hemophilia treatment). In addition, older PWH suffer from the consequences of the comorbidities that developed when their treatment was at the same time poorly available and unsafe. Typical hemophilia comorbidities affect the musculoskeletal system following joint and muscle bleeds, but also the liver and kidney are often impaired due to previous bloodborne infections such as viral hepatitis and HIV. Thus, the comorbidities of hemophilia superimposed on the multimorbidity and polypharmacy associated with aging create peculiar problems in the current management of these patients, that demand the coordinated holistic intervention of internists, geriatricians and clinical pharmacologists in addition to the care traditionally provided by pediatricians and hematologists.

Surgery and survival in birth cohorts with severe haemophilia and differences in access to replacement therapy: The Malmö experience

BACKGROUND

Persons with severe haemophilia require lifelong replacement therapy, prophylaxis, to prevent bleeding. Data describing long-term outcomes of prophylactic treatment are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate joint surgery and survival among persons with severe haemophilia with special attention to access to prophylaxis in the early years of life.

METHODS

Eligible participants had severe haemophilia A or B and were treated at the Malmö centre from the 1960s onward. Time from birth until joint surgery was analysed for participants negative for factor inhibitor and alive in 2000. We compared survival among the entire cohort with severe haemophilia treated at the Malmö centre with the general male population of Sweden and a sample of persons with severe haemophilia from the United Kingdom (UK).

RESULTS

Overall, 167 participants were included, 106 (63.5%) of whom had complete data on joint surgery. Among those born before 1970, 1970-1979 and ≥1980 approximately 37%, 21% and 0% had their first joint surgery by age 30, respectively. There were no second joint surgeries reported in cohorts born ≥1970. Persons with severe haemophilia and negative for HIV treated in Malmö have attained approximately similar survival to that of the general male population in Sweden and live slightly longer than persons with severe haemophilia from the UK.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Prophylaxis in Sweden, although costly, has markedly improved survival and joint outcomes for persons with severe haemophilia. This study highlights the importance of early start of replacement therapy to prevent or postpone serious joint damage.